Full text of "Bulletin"

See other formats

RAVAAyy

\ ‘ ~
\ ANS
SS
\N

Lizz

ty Z ty

SENNA SS ANAS ATE TSS SESS ESAS SPS rn Rn Nan ee ae ge nies NE SNES RN gE

bi8 oh
i Fas

mo eo

-_
ratare Cnn
i

;

»
Ted

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
BULLETIN 73

EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK
INDIANS AND THEIR
NEIGHBORS

JOHN R. SWANTON

gulan Mist;
= ww? te
71> @

WASHINGTON
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
1922

CONTENTS

Page.

PEER ULOM ees te ee hee ne Cee Se, Se ee Se avant Beespost eae 9
iasitication of the Southeastern tribes. ...2......-6..--i..-.0----2c-eesee- es 11
Dogs YEE ovok: 2s ais eee Rie a Riate aps a, baie rar La fa a ee ee ae 31
vee ee eee eS) RE OY ao SAL ore cs ous meee aie Cee epee 31
Ethnological information regarding the Cusabo..........---------------- 72
pac Guale indians and the Yamiasee.... 222. .¢:.. 2.2 S02... 22 ee tn eee 80
RRMA Se rc ee eek Pe oe oe AS EE Soke oie fas See 109
SMRRE IDR RCRREC INE cS nt Rae ks ee We ge ee Riu ok 2 US od 129
BERETS RCMPLT UK NTP ny RN nr AR Re Oe ce ee ey IN UE AT eS 134
Demo wase sen dea wo lett ses se Pre enn ey PE SL Rope UR De, 0 ee 137
The Sawokli ...... Prat ne Ws Sanat NES cn NS: ee ee Ta ed 141
STORE EBC Cl sory teteer ee ee Ree Ar yt - Ry gk SA TaL anl 8 TO ce a 143
snesMiopileanrd NObOM Onset e625 A oe ae ne cle cee ce Te ee os se Bee 150
TEE Oot it 2 es See Tae oe tee, oes me ee a 165
TPE ee oe BO eres ee en I ee te ae ee ee A ee eS pot 167
SPROMEN TCA Stee tee A, Aas ae me A Me tl Ge he ee en ee oe e72
Sipe I NED ae RS ace 8 BOM re Ae ee ls Sains MOMS. Magee ee 178
UNSERE (OVC OT SSIS Se rete, oer ayes ee Sen ee oe TOE 179
SPSETeMMIER ERSTE EPeee ta fee Yon te eee eee Se ee ete DA Rs tee Roe ke Le 181
SRC UMT ATAU lacy Mee Pees Bee ROE yee on! ee | eh Son eee 184
TN EBay o AVIS ONE g a te Se, te Se Aenea ae gh eR 191
BRE em esstsck eee ee Pee ee ee a ee ek oe ae eo 201
STURM cleaver ete soe np ct ag rat ee eek eS he ate he ee 207
CD ATEUS io Sah Sele eS OF AR tie a et ee eee ne a a 207
Tennessee River tribes of uncertain relationship. ...............-.-..----+-.-- 211
IRIE ete ee ot. ee ee Set. Mas Nis aoe c Ns 5s Hoa e Cet aes 215
SIRS Lite eee, ie See SO my ees eee le YE Se Ee 216
“TNO CONS] CUS sR lee a BS cele SF Re pane re ay net AR 2a eee 225
sbexGoosa and their descendants... +0: 42) 222.2 ose e eee tees ee 230
DarecA hikes Se Se ey eke eS ay fee Sar be he Bed 251
erento n alien: 62a ss Sen eee ed ee SO OT et ee 254
MU Cor RT Ty Lae Sees. per nel ee gts oe toh ae Be SD ae 258

AM Dre TS COUPE Wi as Ss ence aie Uieat y ax ‘Set a ay Et ak eee SE eran oe eR 260
SUIEVESAN VEU Ken eae Sh Peep eee nee CCE ERS Lig Be Ee ie 263
TUNG MIGHT SS haat ie llr FSS Rae a Cae ey abe al, eS er aR a 265
MT OBIVOLONI TEM -ee et s ee aes Vth es eee crib eee Eo te a 267
een Ae NOC ee ae je eS Es et Sa Be Soe eee eink cu Pee 269
EMG ere See Se 2 Sele ee ote ie a he ae ek 269
Sea hve O lowe ee oe pe ee ee a 2 ok oa see aan 270
ODES SES gi Se Ae eR TP ES te ean nas oS a 271
ANNE TPG Da 2 lel eae ae ee Ta Oe eS ae eee Be hl See es SE 272
“TREE COMETS See apt eR ea SE Os See Se Gaal ee feats tr age ip SS Oe eee 274
Biticmiticnn anenees eee ates eee es See PE gt nN DR
Oiber Munkopee towns and’ villages..-.-......-...2i<::.0:.--.-5e2cseei-: 282

6 CONTENTS

Page.

Ther Yueh 3 26 .a.6ee Se oes ees so ak ee ee eee 286
Mhe Natchez Ss <2. se yo ak ied Fee aa se ee oe ee eee 312
MING SHAWN ss. nee sore Lac Siw sande aye Sree ah ee = Ore ae 317
Therancient inhabitants of Florida: 22...2.22 e+... - Ne Rt ee ee aoc 320
PIS tOE Ys an se seca olersia las babs Dio Stata whe Dae Oe ane Sh ee 320
Bthnology st 2.233 ein [ae 2s Pee 2s SR ee oe 345
Pe Semin Ole! oF ts Sia aes ec = ee See Seen we ea ee Ce 398
ner Chickasaw 0s ocasee roe s a ere ee ee ee eee eee 414
NoYes O} nore a fae eaten Sores Scarier pee ee I Bee SENT Ae 420
Population of the Southeastem ‘tribes. los ee eo vee ee ee eee 421
Bublnogtap hye ae c5o6 cans Se 2 ate od ater oom eee ake er eee es ie 457
VM OR 5325S zticrere dh heer etsisvene Steel os ee arm See eye ola a RE So ee ee tare oer 463

ILLUSTRATIONS

(IN POCKET OF BACK COVER)

Indian tribes of the southeastern United States.

. Territory of the States of Georgia and Alabama illustrating the geographical

distribution and movements of the tribes and towns of the Creek Con-
federacy.

. The distribution of Indian tribes in the Southeast about the year 1715.

From a MS. map of the period.

. The southeastern part of the present United States. From the Popple

map of 1733.

. The territory between the Chattahoochee and Mississippi Rivers. From

the De Crenay map of 1733.

. The southeastern part of the present United States. From the Mitchell

map of 1755.

. Part of the Purcell map. Prepared not later than 1770 in the interest of

British Indian trade.

. Part of the Melish map of 1814, covering the seat of war between the Creek

Indians and the Americans in 1813-14.

. Towns of the Creek Confederacy as shown on the Early map of Georgia, 1818.
. The Chickasaw country in 1796-1800, according to G. H. V. Collot.

Z 7

EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS AND
THEIR NEIGHBORS

By Joun R. SwanTon

INTRODUCTION

The present paper originated in an attempt to prepare a report on
the Indians of the Creek Confederacy similar to that made in Bulletin
43 for those along the lower course of the Mississippi River.’ In this
study, however, it is still possible to add information obtained from
living Indians, about 9,000 of whom were enumerated in 1910.2 But
when material from all sources had been tentatively brought together
the amount was found to be so great that it was thought advisable to
divide the work into two or three different sections for separate pub-
lication. As our account of the distribution, interrelationship, and
history of these people is to be gathered rather from documentary
sources than from field investigations it is naturally the first to be
ready for presentation. Since it has been compiled primarily for
ethnological purposes, no attempt has been made to give a complete
account of the later fortunes of the tribes under consideration, such
important chapters in their career as the Creek and Seminole wars
and the westward emigration belonging within the province of the
historian strictly so considered. The writer’s main endeavor has
been to trace their movements from earliest times until they are
caught up into the broad stream of later history in which conceal-
ment is practically impossible. Although not pretending that this
work is as yet by any means complete, he has aimed to furnish some-
thing in the nature of an encyclopedia of information regarding the
history of the southeastern Indians for the period covered, and hence
has usually included direct quotations instead of attempting to
recast the material in his own words.

It was found that a satisfactory study of the Creek Indians would
make it necessary to extend the scope of this work so as to consider all
of the eastern tribes of the Muskhogean stock as well as the Indians
of Florida. The Yuchi, on the ethnological side, have been made a

1 Swanton, Indian Tribes of the Lower Mississippi Valley, Bull. 43, Bur. Amer. Ethn., 1911,
2 This includes the Creek and Seminole Indians of Oklahoma, the Seminole of Florida, and the Alabama
and Koasatiof Texas and Louisiana. (Ind, Pop.inthe U.S. and Alaska, 1910, Wash., 1915.)

10 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bunn. 73

special subject of inquiry by Dr. Frank G. Speck,' but so many
new facts have presented themselves in the course of this investiga-
tion regarding the early history of these Indians that they have been
treated at length. Some new information is also given regarding
the Natchez and those Shawnee who were for a long period incor-
porated with the Creeks. The Siouan tribes of the east have been
made the subject of a special study by Mr. James Mooney,? and all
that we know regarding two other southern Siouan tribes, the Biloxi
and Ofo, has been given by the writer in another publication.’ The
ramifications of the Creek Confederacy extended so far that even the
Chickasaw are found to be involved, and they have in consequence

been considered in this paper. The Choctaw, however, forma distinct:

problem and the principal attention paid them has been to incor-
porate a statement regarding their population so that it may be
compared with that of the other Muskhogean tribes.

Sections have been included on the ethnology of the Cusabo
Indians and the Florida tribes, for which we are dependent entirely on
documentary sources.

To illustrate this work several of the more significant of the older
maps have been reproduced, and two from data compiled by the
author. It must be understood that the main object has been to
trace historical movements and give the relative positions of the
various tribes and bands, so that few of the locations may be con-
sidered final. It is hoped that eventually intensive work in the
Southeast, and in other parts of the country as well, will take form
in a series of large-scale maps in which the historical as well as the
prehistoric village sites of our Indians will be recorded with a high
degree of accuracy. So far as the Southeast is concerned, an excel-
‘lent beginning has been made by the Alabama Anthropological
Society. The handbook of this society for 1920, which comes to
hand as the present work is going through the press, contains a
catalogue of ‘‘Aboriginal Towns in Alabama”’ (pp. 42-54), which
marks an advance over anything which has so far appeared and
should be consulted by the student desirous of more precise informa-
tion regarding the locations of many of the towns dealt with in this
volume. In two points only I venture a criticism of this catalogue.
First, I am entirely unable to embrace that interpretation of De
Soto’s route which would bring him to the headwaters of Coosa
River below the northern boundary of Georgia; and secondly, it
seems to me a little risky to attempt an exact identification of the
towns at which that explorer stopped in the neighborhood of the
upper Alabama. At the same time I grant that such identifications
are highly desirable and have no personal theories in conflict with
the ones attempted.

1 Ethnology of the Yuchi Indians, Anthrop. Pubs. Univ. Mus., Univ. Pa., 1, No. 1, 1909,

2 Siouan Tribes of the East, Bull. 22, Bur. Amer, Ethn., 1894.

3 Dorsey and Swanton, Dictionary of the Biloxiand Ofo Languages, Bull. 47, Bur. Amer. Ethn., 1912.
Introduction.

‘1

— P
ee ran ae ee ee ee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 17
CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTHEASTERN TRIBES

Below is a classification of the linguistic groups in the southeastern
part of the United States considered in whole or in part in this bulletin:

Muskhogean stock—Continued.
Muskhogean branch—Continued.
Southern division—Continued.

Muskhogean stock.
Muskhogean branch.
Southern division.

Apalachee. Guale Indians and Yamasee.
Hitchiti group. Cusabo.
Hitchiti. Chatot.
Apalachicola. Osochi.
Sawokli. Northern division.
Okmulgee. Muskogee branch.
Oconee. Kasihta.
Tamali.' Coweta.
Chiaha. Coosa.
Mikasuki. Abihka.
Alabama group. Holiwahali.?
Alabama. Eufaula.
Koasati. Hilibi.
Tawasa. Wakokai.
Pawokti. Tukabahchee.
Muklasa. Okchai.
Choctaw group. Pakana.
Choctaw. Seminole.
Chickasaw. Natchez branch.
Chakchiuma. Natchez.
Houma. Taensa.
Mobile. Avoyel.
Tohome. Uchean stock.
Pensacola. Yuchi.
Taposa. Timuquanan stock.
Ibitoupa. Timucua.
Quinipissa or Mugulasha. South Florida Indians.
Bayogoula. Calusa.
Acolapissa. Tekesta.
Tangipahoa. Ais.
Okelusa. Jeaga.
Nabochi or Napissa. Tamahita.
Tuskegee.

As above intimated, some consideration has also been given to a
part of the Shawnee Indians of the Algonquian stock, who were for
a time incorporated into the Creek Confederacy.

Of course no claim of infallibility is made for this classification.
The connection of some of the tribes thus brought together is well
known, while others are placed with them on rather slender circum-
stantial evidence. The strength of the argument for each I will
now consider.

1 Here and throughout the present work the Polish crossed } stands for a surd 1 common to nearly all of
the southeastern languages and sometimes represented in English, though inadequately, by thl or hl.

12 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

In the first place it may be stated that sufficient linguistic material
is preserved from the Apalachee,! Hitchiti, Mikasuki, Alabama,
Koasati, Choctaw, Chickasaw, the leading tribes of the Muskogee
branch, Natchez, Yuchi, and Timucua, to establish their positions
beyond question. The connection of all of the other tribes of the
Choctaw group except Pensacola, that of the Chatot, and the tribes of
the Natchez branch has been examined by the author in his Indian
Tribes of the Lower Mississippi Valley, to which the reader is referred.?

That Hitchiti with but slight variations was spoken by the Apala-
chicola, Sawokli, and Okmulgee is known to all well-informed Creek
Indians to-day, and some of the people of those tribes can use it or
know some words of it. The town names themselves are in Hitchiti.

Oconee is placed by Bartram among those towns speaking the
“Stinkard”’ language,* and all of the other towns so denominated,
so far as we have positive information, spoke Muskhogean dialects
belonging to either the Hitchiti or Alabama groups. Oconee, being
a lower Creek town, would naturally belong to the first. Further
evidence is furnished by the later associations of the Oconee people
with the Mikasuki.*

The Tamali, so far as our knowledge of them extends, lived in
southern Georgia near towns known to have belonged to the Hitchiti
group, and they were among the first to move to Florida and lay
the foundations of the Seminole Nation. In Spanish documents a
tribe called Tama is mentioned which is almost certainly identical
_ with this,> and it may be inferred that the last syllable represents
the Hitchiti plural -al. These facts all point to a Hitchiti connec-
tion for the tribe.

Bartram tells us that in his time the language of the Chiaha was
entirely different from that of the Kasihta, which we know to have
been Muskogee, and in his list of Creek towns he includes it among
those speaking Stinkard.? As explained above, this latter fact
suggests that Chiaha was a Muskhogean dialect, although not Mus-
kogee. By some of the best-informed Creeks in Oklahoma I was
told it was a dialect of Hitchiti, and that on account of the common
language the Chiaha would not play against the Hitchiti in the
tribal ball games, although they belonged to different fire clans,
which ordinarily opposed each other at such times. The chief of the
Mikasuki told me that Chiaha was the ‘‘foundation”’ of the towns
called Osochi, Mikasuki, and Hotalgihuyana, and that anciently all
spoke the same language.

Buckingham Smith, in 1860.

2 Bulletin 43, Bur. Amer. Ethn. The Washa and Chawasha have, however, since been identified as
Chitimachan. (See Amer. Jour. Ling., 1, no. 1, p. 49.)

3 Bartram, Travels in North America, p. 462.

4 See p. 401.
5 See p. 181 et seq.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 18

The Tawasa Indians ultimately united with the Alabama, and
the living Alabama Indians recall no differences between the lan-
guages of the two peoples. Moreover, Stiggins, writing early in
the eighteenth century, gives certain episodes in the history of the
Tawasa as if he were speaking of the whole of the Alabama.’ Still
more ancient evidence is furnished by Lamhatty, a Tawasa, who
was taken captive by the Creeks and made his way into the Vir-
ginia settlements in 1707. There the historian Robert Beverly met
him and obtained from him an account of his travels and a rude map
of the region which he had crossed in order to reach Virginia.? While
the ending of most river names, —oubab, is identical with that which
appears in Apalachee, the name of the Gulf of Mexico, Ouquodky, is
plainly the Oki hatki, “white water,” of the Hitchiti, and is the name
still applied by them to the ocean. Since the present Alabama
term is Oki hatkad we may perhaps infer that Tawasa speech was
anciently closer to Hitchiti than to Alabama. Later, however,
it was entirely assimilated by Alabama, and therefore it is more
convenient and less hazardous to place it in the Alabama group.
In either case the Muskhogean connection of the language is assured.

It is probable that the ‘‘Pothka’”’ of Lamhatty* were the Pawokti
later found living with the Alabama, and if so it is a fair assumption
that their history was the same as that of the Tawasa.

Muklasa is set down by Bartram as a Stinkard town.‘ It was
located in the upper Creek country, near the Alabama and Koasati
towns, and it has a name taken from either the Alabama or the
Koasati language. Gatschet states with positiveness® that the
Muklasa people were Alabama, and he may have learned that such
was the case from some well-informed Indian now dead, for to-day
the Creeks have well-nigh forgotten even the name.

The Pensacola disappear from history shortly after their appear-
ance in it, and nothing of their language has been preserved. Their
name, however, is plainly Choctaw and signifies ‘‘hair people.’ It
may have been given to them because they wore their hair in a manner
different from that of most of their neighbors, and Cabeza de Vaca
mentions as a curious fact that several chiefs in a party of Indians
he and his companions encountered near Pensacola Bay wore their
hair long. When we recall Adair’s statement to the effect that the
Choctaw were called Pa®sfalaya, “long hair,’’’ because of this very
peculiarity a connection is at once suggested between the two peoples.

1 See p. 140.

?D.1. Bushnell, Jr., in Amer, Anthrop., n. s. vol. x, no. 4, pp. 568-574.

3 Tbid., map.

4 Bartram, Travels in North America, p. 461.

5 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 138.

6 Bandelier, Journey of Alvar Nufiez Cabeza de Vaca, p. 48; also present work, p. 145.
7 Adair, Hist. Am, Inds., p. 192. He spells the word Pas’ Pharéah.

14 : BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The Tuskegee have spoken Muskogee for more than a hundred

years, but from Taitt (1772) and Hawkins (1799) it appears that
they once had a language of their own.1. This statement, was con-
firmed to me by some of the old people and they furnished several
words which they affirmed belonged to it.? Perhaps these are
nothing more than archaic Creek, but in any case the long associa-
tion of the tribe with the Creeks, Hitchiti, and Alabama points to a
Muskhogean connection as the most probable.*

The Muskhogean affinities of Yamasee have long been assumed
by ethnologists, largely on the authority of Dr. Gatschet, but it can
not be said that the evidence which he gives is satisfying. One of
the words cited by him as proving this, Olataraca, is Timucua;
another, yatiqui, is both Creek and Timucua; and most of the others
are not certainly from Yamasee. The traditions of the Creeks are
divided, some holding that the Yamasee language was related to
theirs, others that it was entirely distinct. This last contention
need not have much weight with us, however, because to a Creek
Hitchiti is an ‘‘altogether different” language. From the state-
ments of Spanish writers it is certain that the language spoken
in their territories and those of the adjoining coast tribes,
northward of Cumberland Island, was distinct from the Timu-
cua of Cumberland Island and more southern regions. One prov-
ince is called the ‘‘lengua de Guale,” the other the ‘‘lengua de
Timucua.”’’ More specific evidence as to the nature of that former
language is not wanting. In 1604 Pedro de Ibarra, governor of
Florida, journeyed from St. Augustine northward along the coast as
far as St. Catherines Island, stopping at the important mission sta-
tions and posts, and holding councils with the Indians at each place.*
Until he left San Pedro (Cumberland) Island he employed as inter-
preter a single Indian named Juan de Junco, but as soon as he passed
northward of that point another interpreter named Santiago was
added. Moreover, the chiefs met previously were all called ‘‘cacique,”’
but afterwards the name ‘‘mico”’ is often appended, the chief of the very
first town encountered being called the ‘‘cacique and mico mayor don
Domingo.”’ It appearsin letters written both before and after the one
quoted above, as in three by Governor de Canco in 1597, 1598, and
1603, and the report of a pastoral visit to the Florida missions by the
Bishop of Cubain 1606. The earliest of all is in the narrative of an ex-
pedition sent from Havana in search of Ribault’s Port Royal Colony.

1 Mereness, Trav. in Amer. Col., p. 541; Hawkins, Sketch of the Creek Country, Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls.,
In, p. 39.

2 See p. 208.

3 See also the Alabama tradition (p. 192) in which Tuskegee, under the name Hatcafaski, seems to be
enumerated among the Alabama towns.

4 Gatschet, op. cit., pp. 62-63.

5 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 171, 177.

6 Ibid., pp. 169-193.

Se ee

———

Iw ee Te.

‘

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 15

The captain of the vessel ‘‘landed near the town of Guale and went
there, where was the lord micoo (el senor micoo).” A little later
‘‘the micoo of a town called Yanahume’’ came to see him. This
word is nothing other than the Creek term for chief.

In 1598 the confessions of Guale Indians, whose testimony was
being taken with reference to the revolt of 1597, were communicated
by them to a Timucua who understood the language of Guale, and
by him to another Timucua who could speak Spanish. In a letter
describing his missionary work Fray Baltazar Lopez, who was sta-
tioned at San Pedro, states that, while he is himself familiar with the
language of his own Indians, he employs interpreters in speaking to
the Guale people passing back and forth between their own country
and St. Augustine.!

Some supplementary evidence is furnished also by the place and
personal names recorded from the Indians in this area, which
will be found in the section on the Guale Indians and the Yamasee.
The difference between these and Timucua names is apparent when
they are compared with the list of names on pages 323-330. The
phonetic 7 does not appear, except in one case where it is plainly
not an original sound, while f and /, which are foreign to the eastern
Siouan dialects, are much in evidence. So far as Yuchi is concerned
the history of that tribe, as will be seen later, tends to discount the
idea of any connection there. Besides, m appears to occur in the
Guale language at least—Tumaque, Altamahaw, Tolomato, Tamufa,
Ymunapa—while it is wanting in Yuchi. To these arguments may be
added the positive resemblances to Muskhogean forms in such names
as Talaxe (pronounced Talashe), Hinafasque, Ytohulo, Fuloplata,
Tapala, Capala (Sapala), Culupala, Otapalas, Pocotalligo, Dawfuskee.

Finally, the relationship is indicated by the speeches of various
Creek chiefs at the time of their historic conference with Governor
Oglethorpe in 1733.2, Tomochichi, chief of the Yamacraw, a small
band of Indians living near Savannah at that time, says ‘‘I was a
banished man; I came here poor and helpless to look for good land
near the tombs of my ancestors.”” The Oconee chief declares that
he is related to Tomochichi, and on behalf of the Creek Nation
claims all of the lands southward of the river Savannah. Finally the
mico of Coweta thus expresses himself:

I rejoice that I have lived to see this day, and to see our friends that have long been
gone from among us. Our nation was once strong, and had ten towns, but we are
now weak and have but eight towns. You [Oglethorpe] have comforted the banished,
and have gathered them that were scattered like little birds before the eagle. We

desire, therefore, to be reconciled to our brethren who are here amongst you, and we
give leave to Tomo-chi-chi, Stimoiche, and Illispelle to call their kindred that love

1 Lowery, MSS.
2 A True and Hist. Narr. of the Colony of Ga, in Am., &c., Charles Town, S. C., 1741, pp. 31-39.

16 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

them out of each of the Creek towns that they may come together and make one town.
We must pray you to recall the Yamasees that they may be buried in peace amongst
their ancestors, and that they may see their graves before they die; and their own
nation shall be restored again to its ten towns.

Here the Yamacraw and the Yamasee seem to be treated as former
members of the Creek Confederacy. Unless the Yamasee and the
Guale Indians had been so considered the Creeks at this council
would not have claimed all of the land on the Georgia coast south of
the Savannah River and at the same time have asked that the
Yamasee be recalled to inhabit it. It is as guardians of these tribes
that they ceded to Oglethorpe the coast between Savannah River
and St. Simons Island, with the exception of the islands of Ossabaw,
Sapello, and St. Catherines, and a small strip of land near Savannah
city.

The particular Muskhogean dialect which these Indians spoke is,
however, more difficult to ascertain. Ranjel indicates a connection
between the Yamasee and Hitchiti,’ and this impression appears to
have been shared generally by the Muskogee Indians of later times.
On the other hand, the word for chief among the Guale Indians was,
as we have seen, miko,’ the form which it has in Muskogee, whereas
the proper Hitchiti term is miki. This means either that Muskogee
was already the lingua franca upon the coast of Georgia or else that
the languages of the Guale Indians and the Yamasee belonged to
distinct groups. According to several traditions the Muskogee at one
time lived upon this very coast, and I am inclined to accept the second
explanation, but it is not put forward with overmuch confidence.

The name of the Cusabo first appears in the form ‘‘Co¢apoy” in a
letter of Governor Pedro Menendez Marques dated January 3, 1580.
It is there given as the name of a big town occupied by hostile Indians
and strongly placed in a swamp, about 15 leagues from the Spanish
fort at Santa Elena.’ The tribe appears later as one of those accused
of fomenting an uprising against the Guale missionaries in 1597, and
afterwards among those appealed to for help in putting it down.*
There is every reason to believe that its appellation was connected
in some way with that of the Coosa Indians of South Carolina, but
how is not certain. ;

By the English the name is sometimes used to designate all of the
coast tribes of South Carolina from Savannah River to Charleston
and two on the lower course of the Santee. On the other hand, not
only are the latter sometimes excluded, but at least one of the tribes
of the neighborhood of Charleston Inlet. Mooney suggests a still
more restricted use of the word.® In its most extended application

1 See p. 95.

2 Or mico; ¢ indicates precisely the same as k.

3 Lowery, MSS.

4 See p. 60.

5 Siouan Tribes of the East, Bull. 22, Bur. Amer. Ethn., p. 86.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 17

it included the Santee, Sewee, Etiwaw, Wando, Stono, Kiawa, Edisto,
Ashepoo, Combahee, Indians of St. Helena, Wimbee, Witcheau,
and Coosa. However, there is good reason to reject the Santee
and Sewee from this association and to place them with the Siouan
tribes of the east, to which the Catawba and other tribes of north-
eastern South Carolina and eastern North Carolina belonged. This
is the conclusion of Mooney, and it is confirmed by the following
arguments.

On his second expedition toward the north, in 1609, Francisco
Fernandez de [Ecija had as interpreter, ‘‘for all that coast,’’ Maria
de Miranda, « woman from the neighborhood of Santa Elena, named
presumably from the former governor of Santa Elena, Gutierrez de
Miranda. In Cayagua entranee (Charleston Harbor) he met a
Christian Indian, Alonso, with whom he had previously had dealings
and who is spoken of as ‘‘interpreter (lengua) of the River Jordan,”
the Santee, upon which stream his own town was located. Ecija
states that Alonso and Maria de Miranda understood one another
and even goes so far as to state that ‘‘ they spoke the same language.”
From what follows, however, it is evident that we are to understand
only that they understood and could use the same languages, for
just below Ecija says of another Indian whom he calls “mandador
of the River Jordan” that he spoke through the said Maria de Mir-
anda, ‘‘ because the said Indian understood something of the language
of Escamaqu.”’ This indicates that the language of the Santee
River people was distinct from that of ‘‘Escamaqu”’ or Santa Elena.
While he was on the Santee, Ecija secured the surrender of a French-
man living among the “‘Sati’’ (Santee) Indians. This man declared
that he had obtained news of the English colony to the northward
from three Indians, and when the explorers were in Charleston
Harbor on their return an Indian came down the river who he said
was one of those who hadinformed him. Ecija questioned this Indian,
but “understanding that he (the Indian) understood the language
of Santa Elena, the said captain (Ecija) commanded that the said Maria
de Miranda should speak with him. Then he asked him through
her the same questions that the Frenchman had asked him in the
language of Sati.”’' These facts show plainly that the language
spoken on Santee River and that of Santa Elena were not mutually
intelligible.

In 1700-1701 John Lawson traveled northeastward from Charles-
ton to the Tuscarora country, thus passing through the very heart
of the eastern Siouan territory. He visited and described both the
Santee and Sewee and hence must have had opportunities to hear their
speech. It is significant, therefore, that he states of the l:. :uages

1 Lowery, MSS.
148061 °—22—_2

18 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 73

of all the people through whose territories he had passed that none
of them had the sounds f or /.!. This is true of Catawba, the sole
representative of the Siouan languages of the east from which we
have much material. It is therefore probable that Lawson was
correct for the other languages to which he refers.? Santee and
Sewee would thus share this dialectic peculiarity and be associated
by it with the other eastern Siouan tribes. On the other hand,
several town or tribal and personal names from the Cusabo country
contain 7 and one an f.* It is perhaps significant that in forming
companies of his Indian allies before marching against the Tuscarora,
Capt. Barnwell placed the ‘‘Corsaboy” in one company with the
Yamasee, Yuchi, and Apalachee, while the ‘‘Congerees and Sattees,”’
the last of whom must be the Santee, were with the ‘‘ Watterees,
Sagarees, Catabas, Suterees, and Waxaws.” The composition of
his other companies shows clearly that neighboring and related
tribes were purposely placed together. On the other hand, there are
certain linguistic considerations which seem to indicate an alliance
between the Cusabo tribes proper and the Indians of the Muskhogean
stock. It is to be noted that the French Huguenots established
among the Cusabo in 1562 visited the Guale chief to obtain corn,
accompanied by Cusabo guides, and had no difficulty in commu-
nicating with him.® When Spanish missionaries were sent to the
Province of Guale, south of the Savannah, they composed a grammar
in the language of the people among whom they lived, and this
grammar subsequently fell into the hands of missionaries among
the Cusabo.® It would naturally be supposed that if any radical
difference existed between the languages of the two provinces some
comment would have been made, but neither the missionaries at
this time nor the Spanish explorers then or later so much as hint
that any such difference existed, though they do indeed recognize
the country north of the Savannah River as constituting a distinct
province from that to the southward.

In 1600, when testimony was taken from a number of Guale
chiefs, it is stated in a letter detailing the proceedings that “the
notary who had been eight years in the Province of Santa Elena,
although he did not speak the language, understood much of the
languages of those provinces, and attested that the Guale Indians

1 Lawson, Hist. Carolina, p. 378.

2Tn his vocabulary of Woccon, another Siouan dialect, there is no f and but one /, in the word for ‘‘duck.”

3 See pp. 20-24.

4 South Carolina Hist. and Genealogical Mag., ix, pp. 30-31.

5 Since their guides belonged to the Maccou or Escamacu tribe, which there is some reason to think may
have been identical with that later known as Yamacraw, this fact might not in itself be conclusive, but
these Maccou were found to be associating intimately with the other Cusabo tribes in their neighborhood
without any suggestion of a difference in language, and a little later the Spaniards applied their name to
the entire district or ‘‘provinee’’ otherwise designated Orista or Santa Elena, the southern part of the
Cusabo territory (see p. 60).

6 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, p. 307; Barcia, La Florida, pp. 138-139.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 19

spoke the truth.’”’! Somewhat more equivocal is a reference to an
interpreter named Diego de Cardenas, who is said to have “under-
stood the language of Santa Elena and also that of the Province of
Guale.”” He himself testifies, in 1601, that he “has been many
times in the lengua de Guale and is lengua of that (province) and of
Escamacu.’"' Most important of all is, of course, the flat statement
by Gov. Pedro Menendez Marques, when, in writing in 1580 of the
Indians of Santa Elena, among whom he then was, he says ‘“‘ they
speak the Guale language.”’ A more nearly literal translation of the
words he uses would perhaps be, “It (Santa Elena) pertains to the
linguistic Province of Guale (viene 4 la lengua de Guale).’’?

In his expedition north on the Atlantic coast, to which reference
has already been made,’ Governor Ibarra went no farther than Guale
(St. Catherines Island), but one of the chiefs who came to see him
at this place was named Oya, in all probability the same as the Oya
or Hoya mentioned by French and Spaniards as living near the pres-
ent Beaufort, S.C.4. While Ibarra was at St. Catherines we also learn
that “the chief of Aluete said that the chief of Talapo and the chief
of Ufalague and the chief of Orista, his nephew and heirs, were his
vassals and had left him and gone to live with the mico of Asao”’
(St. Simons Island); and when the governor came to Asao on his

return he met them there and had a conference with them.® Orista

was certainly a Cusabo chief, and there is every reason to suppose
that the others mentioned with him were also Cusabo. As we have
already stated, in his dealings with the Indians north of Cumber-
land Island, Governor Ibarra employed two interpreters, Juan de
Junco and Santiago. There is no hint that any change was made
after that time, and not the slightest indication that the Cusabo
employed a language different from that of the Guale Indians, among
whom Ibarra met them. The chief of Oya is referred to as a ‘‘mico’”’
along with the chief of Guale, while the chiefs Talapo, Ufalague, and
Orista seemed to have moved down the coast to Asao as the result
of some slight disagreement with their neighbors and to have settled
there as if they were perfectly at home.

Again, as has already been remarked, while f and / are absent from
the Siouan dialects to the north, r is a conspicuous sound, appearing
in such names as Congaree, Sugeree, Wateree, Shakori, etc. It also
appears in one form of the name Santee given by Lawson—Seretee.
On the other hand, it is wanting in all Cusabo names that have come
down to us—with one or two exceptions which need cause no disturb-
ance. Thus, the name Orista, given above, appears persistently in

1 Lowery, MSS. 4 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 188.
2 Lowery and Brooks, MSS. 5 Ibid., p. 191.
3 See p. 14.

90 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Spanish documents, butit is evidently the Edisto of the English and the
Audusta of the French. The Edisto are in one place called Edistare,
but it is probable that this form was after the analogy of the Siouan
names, and it may, in fact, have been obtained through a Siouan
interpreter. Moreover, Laudonniére, on inquiring of the Cusabo
Indians about the great chief Chicora, of whom he had learned
through Spanish writings, was told instead of a chief Chiquola living
toward the north. The J, it is to be seen, is substituted for r.

Spanish attempts to record the Cusabo language were cut short by
the unfriendliness of the natives and the abandonment of the mis-
sions. Linguistic material may yet be discovered, however, among
the unpublished documents of Spain. At all events the Spaniards
had a very much better excuse than our own South Carolina colonists
for their almost complete failure to make any permanent record of
the language of the people among whom their first settlements were
made. A few detached phrases and the following place, personal, and
other names are practically all that is left of Cusabo:

ABLANDOLES. Mentioned together with the ‘‘Chiluques”’ asa tribe of Santa Elena.
As the latter probably refers to a non-Cusabo tribe, the Cherokee, the former may
not be a Cusabo tribe either.”

Anoyast, Aosi (?). A small town near Ahoya, or Hoya.

Auusn. A chief of Edisto.*

AuustE, ALugsTE, ALIESTE, ALUETE. A chief and village probably located near
Beaufort, South Carolina. This may be only a form of Edisto (see p. 60).

ApPpEE-BEE. The Indian name of Foster Creek, 8. C.5

AsHEPoo, AsHtpoo, ASSHEPOO, ASHA-PO, IsHpow. A tribe and a river named
from it still so called; in one place this is made a synonym for Edisto.

AWENDAW, OWENDAW, AU-EN-DAU-BOO-E. An old town, perhaps Sewee.® The
name is preserved to the present day.

Basicxock. A creek flowing into Edisto River, near its mouth.

Bacxsooxks, BackHooks. Coast people at war with the Santee; they may have
been Siouan instead of Cusabo.?

Barcuo Amini. An Indian of Santa Elena of the town of Cambe, perhaps a Spanish
name.?

Buuacacay. <A Santa Elena Indian.”

Boutcxetr. An Indian village near Rockville, S. C.; a creek and a modern place are
still so called.

Boo-sHoo-EE, Boo-cHaw-EE. A name for the land about the peninsula between
Dorchester Creek and Ashley River. There are a number of variants of this name.®

CaLLAwassi£. An island on one side of Colleton River.'°

CamBe. A town in the province of Santa Elena.?

Caruco. Name given in one place to the fort at Santa Elena. It seems to be an
Indian word."!

1 Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, pp. 29-31. 7 Tbid., p. 45.

2 Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. 8S. Car. Hist. Soe. Colls., V, pp. 63, 334.

3S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, pp. 20, 170. 9§. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., VI, p. 63 et seq.
4 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 187-188. 10 Modern name.

5S. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., VI, p. 64. ll Brooks, MSS.

6 Lawson, Hist. Carolina, p. 24.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 21
CHATUACHE, SATUACHE, SaToacHE. A town and mission station 6 to 10 leagues
north of the Spanish fort of Santa Elena.!
CueHAw. A river; the name probably refers to the Chiaha tribe, to be discussed

later.?

CHICHESSEE, CHECHESSA. A river flowing into Port Royal Sound, and also a creek,
otherwise known as Deer Creek.?

Crowrer. Head warrior of the ‘‘Ittuans.’’ It appears from certain writers that
he took his name from a white family of the name Crowder, therefore it is not really
an Indian name.’

COMBAHEE, COMBOHE, COMBEHE, COMBEE, COMBAHE. A tribe on a river which
still bears their name; they were bounded by the Coosa, who were said to live north-
east of Combahee River.

Coosa, Kusso, Causa, CussoEs, Kussores, Kusso, Coosor, Cussor, Coosaw,
Kustan, Cussau, Kissan, Casor, Cocaoyo, Cocao, Cozao. <A tribe sometimes
reckoned among the Cusabo and sometimes excluded from them. They lived on the
upper reaches of the rivers from the Ashley to the Coosawhatchie.*

CusABO, CUSABES, CORSABOY, CUSABEES, CUSABOE, COOSABOYS, KoRSABOI,
Cussopos, Cogapoy, COSAHUE, COsAPUE, CossaPpuE. Collective name for the tribes,
or part of the tribes, now under discussion.’ Originally it seems to have been applied
to a town (see p. 58).

CorrBas. A place.®

Darna, DarHaw. An island on the coast. This is south of Port Royal Sound;
and although it is in South Carolina it may have been in the Yamasee territory. It
is also given as the name of a chief.’

Dawno. A modern river name.

Episto, Epistan, Epista, Epistor, Episron, Epistow, Episton, EpistTarg,
OpisTAsH, Orista, OristanuM (Latinized), Aupusta, Apusra, Usra. One of the
Cusabo tribes.§ ;

Escamacu, ErscamMaau, Escamaau, Escamaquu, Escamatu, Uscamacu, CAMACU,
CamMAQqu, Maccovu. One of the most important of the tribes near Port Royal in Spanish
times; it frequently gave its name to the province (see p. 60).

Ettwaw, Erewavus, Ettwans, Irrawans, Iruan, Irwan, Itravans, Errrwan,
Irawans, Erwans, Irawans, Inwans, Evuraw (?). A tribe on Wando River,
sometimes included with the Cusabo and sometimes excluded from them.?

GuaALDAPE. Name of the region where Ayllén made his last settlement, in 1526
(see pp. 38-41).

Hemato. A Cusabo chief who visited Madrid and was killed by a Spanish captain
in 1576.

Hoscaw Point. The extreme south termination of land lying between the Wacca-
maw River and the sea; also a point on the south bank of Wando River where it de-
bouches into Cooper River, now Remley’s Point. The name Hobcaw Neck was
applied anciently to all land between Shem-ee Creek and Wando River.!°

1 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 132; Lowery, MSS.

2 Modern name.

? South Carolina Pub. Does., MS.

‘ The name occurs in numerous places. See p. 68 et seq.

6 Occurs in numerous places. See pp. 31-80 following; also Mooney, Bull. 22, Bur. Amer. Ethn.,
pp. 82, 86.

6S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 332.

7 See p. 42.

8 Modern geographical name.

9 See pp. 24-25.

10S. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., xIv, p. 61.

29 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [puLn. 73

Hooks. Given with the Backbooks as a tribe at war with the Santee; they may
have been Siouan instead of Cusabo ! (see p. 20).

Hoya, Anoya, Oya. A town mentioned by both Frenchmen and Spaniards, on
or near Broad River.

IcKABEE, IcKERBY, ACCABEE. Peronneau’s Point on Ashley River.’

Icosans. According to Bartram, a tribe near South Carolina hostile to the colonists
and driven away by the Creeks; probably the Coosa.*

Inna. A Santa Elena Indian.*

Jonassa. An island.§

Krawa, Cayaaua, Cayaana, CayEcua, Kiwana, Kywana, Kywaws, CayAwAnH,
CayawasH, Kyawaw, Krawnuas, Kreywaw, Keyawau, Kayawan, Kaaway,
Krawan, Keywananu, Kiaway, Krawaws, Kiawas, Keawaw, Kayawaeu, KYE-
waw, CHyawHaw. A Cusabo tribe living on Ashley River.®

Mayon. A town, apparently on Broad River, in 1562 (see pp. 49, 50).

PALAWANA, Ponawak (?). An island near St. Helena Island, which was granted
to the remnant of the Cusabo in 1712.7

Patrica. Given by Bartram as a tribe formerly living near South Carolina and
driven off by the Creeks; they were probably one of the Yamasee bands.*

OKETEE, OKEETEE, OKATIE, OKETEET. A river flowing into Colleton River, near
Port Royal.°

Onrse-cavu. Indian name of Bull’s Island, perhaps Siouan.

Santruracuo Huanucase. An Indian of Santa Elena.*

SuHapoo, SHEEDOu. A chief of Edisto.®

Suem-cE. A creek near Charleston now called Shem.'°

Srono, Sronan, STronoEe, SToANOES, STonoH, SToNOES, OsTANO, OsTANUM
(Latinized), SraramE(?). One of the Cusabo tribes, on Stono Inlet.®

SuFALATE. Probably Cusabo because associated with Ufalague (see p. 82).

TaLapo, TaLapuz, YraLapo. A chief and town probably near Beaufort, 8. ©.”

Tipwen. A plantation.”

Trprcop Haw, Trepycuttaw, Tippycop Law, TipBEKupDLAW. Indian name of a
hill in Wadboo barony.'*

Toupra, Toupa. A town and chief, located apparently on Broad River in 1562
(see p. 49).

Uratacue, Uratecue. A chief, probably from the neighborhood of Beaufort, S.C.“

Wapsoo, Warsoo, Warroo. A creek flowing into Cooper River; a Wadboo Bridge
appears later.'®

Wampaw. A creek and swamp, perhaps in the Siouan territory instead of in that
of the Cusabo.!®

1 Lawson, Hist. Carolina, p. 45.

2§. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 396.

3 Bartram, Travels, p. 54.

4 Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib.

5 Modern geographical name.

6 Modern geographical name; also see pp. 24-25, 61.

7 Thomas in 18th Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pt. 2, p. 633.
8 Bartram, op. cit., p. 54.

9§. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., V, pp. 19, 20, 23, 64-65, 68, 70

10 §. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., VI, p. 64.

ll Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 188; also see p. 82.

12 §, Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 175.

13 §. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., XI, p. 171; XU, pp. 47-48.

4 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 188, 190.

1 §. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., V, p. 332; S. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag. V, pp. 32, 119,
16 Modern name.

af 45 2k A

ee ee ee ee ee ee Te

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 23

Wampr, Wamper. The name of a plant which grows in the lowlands of South
Carolina; also called pickerel weed (Pontederia cordata).!

Wanpo, Wannoe. A tribe on Cooper River usually included with the Cusabo;
Wando River is named for them but the name has been transferred from the stream
to which it properly belongs.”

Wanrtoor. A plantation in the low country of South Carolina.*

WAPENSAW. Lands near Charleston, S. C.4

Warretaw Bripee. A place name.

Warpoo, Wappo, Waroo. A creek on the landward side of Edisto Island; also given
by Bartram as the name of a tribe formerly living near South Carolina, which the
Creeks had driven away.5

WasuisHor. A plantation.®

Wasuua. An island.’

Westo, Westor, Weston, Westa, WEstRAS. A name which appears to have been
given to the Yuchi by the Cusabo and is evidently in the Cusabo language.’

Westospoo, WESTOEBOU, WESTOE BOU, WESTOE Boo, WESTOE Bou. The name of
the Savannah River in the Cusabo language, said to mean ‘“ River of the Westo”’ and
in one place interpreted as ‘“‘the Enemies’ River.’’ °

Wisee, WIMBEHE, GuUIOMAEZ (?). A Cusabo tribe which seems to have been
located between the Combahee and Broad Rivers.'

Wrva. Mentioned as an Indian met near Port Royal in 1681 along with another
named Antonio. It may be merely the Spanish Juan.

Wiskinsoo. A swamp in Berkeley County, between Cooper and Santee Rivers.'!

Wrireneau, Wicucaun, WatcHetsau (?). A Cusabo tribe mentioned only two or
three times; location unknown.!?

Wommony. The son of a chief of St. Helena.'’

YesHor. The name of certain lands in South Carolina near Charleston.

YaNAHUME. A town on the south side of ‘the river of Santa Elena,’’ reported by
a Spanish expedition of 1564.'°

Following are the few words and phrases to be found in early works
dealing with this region:

Appapa. The[{Sewee?] Indians called out this word to the English and it is probably
corrupt Spanish.'®

HippeskeEHu. This is said to mean ‘“‘sickly.’’!’

Hippie pop. Described as ‘‘a word of great kindness among them”’; the Indians
who used this, however, also referred to the English as ‘‘comraro,’’ evidently an
attempt at the Spanish camarada, so we can not feel sure that hiddie dod is not a
corrupt Spanish expression as well.'*

Hippy poppy Comorapo ANGLES WESTOE SxKorryYE, ‘‘English very good friends,
Westoes are nought.’’'* The words here are under the same suspicion as the one just
mentioned and must therefore be handled carefully; moreover, Indian words con-
tained in old documents are so often transcribed wrongly that we can never be certain
of the exact form where we have but one example to which to refer.

1 Modern name. 10 Tbid., pp. 65, 334; also see p. 55.

2 See p. 61. 11S. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., xml, p. 12.
8S. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., mI, p. 192. 12 See p. 70.

4 Tbid., vi, p. 64. 13 §, Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, pp. 21, 75.

6 Bartram, Travels, p. 54. 4S. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., VI, p. 64.
6S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., V, p. 175. 1s Lowery, MSS.

7 A modern place name. 16S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v ,p. 166.

8 See pp. 288-291. 17 Tbid., p. 201.

9S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., V, 76-77, 166, 378, 18 Tbid , p. 199.

386-387, 428, 459-460. 19 Thid., p. 459.

24 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

One among the above names, Ufalague, has an f and an J; six
others an /, Aluete, Alush, Callawassie, Palawana, Stalame, Talapo;
and seven an m, Combahee, Shemee, Stalame, Wambaw, Wampi,
Wimbee, Wommony. As in the case of the Guale and Yamasee
languages (see p. 15), these argue a Muskhogean connection.

The only other fact that seems to promise assistance is the trans-
lation of the word Westoboo as ‘‘river of the Westo,’’ from which it
would seem that boo signifies “‘river.’’ So far as I have been able to
find, nothing like this occurs in either Yuchi or Catawba, the closest
resemblance being with the Choctaw bok,? with which perhaps the
Alabama pa‘ni, the Timucua 7bi(ne), and the Apalachee wbab are con-
nected. The little evidence this one word gives us, therefore, points
toward Muskhogean relationship. It is possible that the same word
occurs in certain of the names given above, such as Ashepoo, Bohicket,
Boo-shoo-ee, Backbooks, Cusabo, Wadboo, Wappoo, Wiskinboo, and
perhaps also in Combahee (also spelled Combohe). If this expla-
nation holds good for Cusabo the term would probably mean ‘‘Coosa
River people,”’ though it is difficult to see how such a name came to
be applied generally, in some cases to the exclusion of the Coosa
Indians themselves. We must suppose it to have been adopted
as the name of a town near the mouth of the Coosawhatchie, or some
other river on which Coosa lived, and the usage to have extended
from that place along the coast. It should be noted as a rather
remarkable fact, and one probably based on some feature of the
Cusabo tongue, that of the place and personal names given above,
16, or more than one-fourth, begin with w. This is a common initial
in stream names from the Creek language, owing to the fact that
many of them begin with wi, which is almost the same as 02, an abbre-
viation of oiwa, water; but in the names under consideration wa
initial is more common than wi and we together.

The evidence so far adduced applies particularly to that group
of Cusabo tribes living near Beaufort, to which the term is sometimes
confined. There was a second group, farther to the north, about
Charleston Harbor, consisting of the Kiawa, Etiwaw, Wando, and
perhaps the Stono. In both the English and Spanish narratives
the chief of Kiawa appears on intimate terms with those of Edisto and
St. Helena, and their solidarity is emphasized on more than one
occasion by the early writers, they being classed as coast Indians, and
contrasted with the Westo inland upon the Savannah River and
the tribes living in the ‘‘sickly”’ country northward of them.’ In
later times the Etiwaw assisted the English in destroying the Siouan
Santee and Congaree.*. Henry Woodward, upon whom the English

1§. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 167.

2 It should be noted that final-k in many Choctaw words is barely distinguishable as pronounced.
3 See p. 67; also Lowery, MSS.

48. Car. Pub. Docs., MS.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 95

settlers of South Carolina relied in all of their communications with
the natives, calls the Kiawa ‘‘Chyawhaw,”’’ and although he is unsup-
ported in this, his information should have been the most reliable.
If he is correct, the Kiawa were probably a branch of those Chiaha
Indians noted elsewhere, some of whom are known to have lived near
the Yamasee at an early period. It is also to be observed that the
chief of Kiawa accompanied Woodward on his expedition to visit the
chief of ‘‘Chufytachyque”’ and acted as his interpreter.? If the latter
were the Kasihta Creeks, as I shall try to show,’ this fact would
indicate some similarity between the languages of the two peoples.
The following statement of the explorer Sanford may be added:

All along I observed a kinde of Emulacon amongst the three principall Indians of
this Country (viz') Those of Keywaha, Eddistowe and Port Royall concerning us
and our Friendshipp, contending to assure it to themselves and jealous of the other
though all be allyed and this Notw‘"standing that they knewe wee were in actuall
warre with the Natives att Clarendon and had killed and sent away many of them,
ffor they frequently discoursed with us concerning the warre, told us that the Natives
were noughts they land Sandy and barren, their Country sickly, but if wee would
come amongst them Wee whould finde the Contrary to all their Evills, and never any
occasion of dischargeing our Gunns but in merryment and for pastime.‘

Clarendon County was in the North Carolina settlement between
Cape Fear and Pamlico Sound, mainly in Siouan territory. In 1727
the Kiawa chief was given a grant of land south of the Combahee
River, which probably means that his people removed about that
time to the south to be near the other Cusabo Indians.°®

Besides these two coastal groups of Cusabo the Coosa tribe is to
be distinguished in some degree from the rest because, instead of
occupying a section of coast, 1t was in the hinterland of South Caro-
lina along the upper courses of the Ashley, Edisto, Ashepoo, Combahee,
and Coosawhatchie Rivers. From this difference in position and on
the strength of the name I suggest that it may possibly have been a
branch of the Coosa of Coosa River, Alabama, and hence may have
belonged to the true Muskogee group. On the basis of our present
information this can not be definitely affirmed or denied.

By nearly all of the living Creeks the Osochi are supposed to be
a Muskogee tribe of long standing, and Bartram classifies them
with those who in his time spoke the Muskogee tongue.* Neverthe-
less Adair gives them as one of the ‘“‘nations’’ which had settled
among the Lower Creeks.? In very early times they came to be
associated very closely with the Chiaha and when they gave up
their own square ground the two combined. An old Osochi whom

1 §. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 186.

2 Ibid, p. 191.

3 See pp. 216-218.

4S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, pp. 79-80.

6S. Car. Does. (Pub. Records of S. Car., X, p. 24.)
6 Bartram, Travels, p. 462.

7 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257.

26 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 73

I met in Oklahoma stated that his mother knew how to speak
Hitchiti and he believed that many more of his people had known
how to speak that language in earlier times. This would naturally
be the case if, as seems to be indicated, the Chiaha were a Hitchiti
speaking people, but of course it is possible that the Osochi anciently
belonged to the Hitchiti group also. However, whether they ever
spoke Hitchiti as a tribe or not, I am strongly of the opinion that
they are the descendants of the people known to De Soto and his
companions as the Ugachile,! Uzachil,? Veachile,? or Ossachile.‘
Veachile is probably a misprint for Ugachile. If this identification
is correct the Osochi were evidently a Timucua tribe, which gradually
migrated north until absorbed by the Lower Creeks. Confirmatory
evidence appears to be furnished by a Spanish official map of the
eighteenth century® on which at the junction of the Chattahoochee
and Flint Rivers a tribe or post is located with the legend, ‘‘Apalache
6 Sachile.” Apparently the compiler of the map supposed that the
6 in this name was the Spanish conjunction instead of an integral .
part of the word. The position assigned to them by him agrees
exactly with that of the Apalachicola Indians at that period, and if
“6 Sachile”’ really refers to the Osochi we must suppose either that
they had united with some of the Apalachicola or that they were
classified with and considered a branch of them. Since the word
Timucua often appears as Tomoco or Tomoka in English writings
this hypothesis would also explain the Tomoédka town westward of
the Apalachicola on the map of Lamhatty*® and the Tommahees
referred to by Coxe in the same region.?’ These particular Timucua
would be none other than the Osochi.

The Kasihta, Coweta, Coosa, Abihka, Holiwahali, Eufaula, Hilibi,
and Wakokai, with their branches, have always, so far as our infor-
mation goes, been considered genuine Muskogee people. The only
suspicion to the contrary is in the case of the Coosa, whose name
looks very much like a common corruption of the Choctaw word
konshak, meaning ‘‘cane.’’ By this name the Muskogee were known
to the Mobile Indians. Jn Padilla’s history of the De Luna expedi-
tion we read that, when the Spaniards accompanied the Coosa in
an attack upon their western neighbors, they came to a wide
river known as “Oke chiton,” or ‘great river.” Jf this name was in
the Coosa language it would prove that at that time they spoke
Choctaw, but more likely it was in the language of their enemies.

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 73.

2 Ibid. 1, p. 41.

3 Ibid, U, p. 6.

4 Garcilasso de La Vega, in Shipp, Hist. of De Soto and Florida, p. 330.

& Reproduced in Hamilton, Colonial Mobile, p. 210.

6 Amer, Anthrop., n.s. vol. X, p. 569

7 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1850, p. 234. On his map he has ‘“‘ Tomachees”’ (Deser. Prov. Car., 1741).

Peon Boe TS

a = ‘TT?!

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS oy

About one-sixth of all Creeks are probably of Coosa descent, and it is
unlikely that a tribe of such size should have given up its language
while much smaller bodies retained theirs almost or quite down to
the present time.

The Tukabahchee are considered by most Creek Indians at the
present day as the leaders of the nation. Nevertheless Milfort,!
and also Adair,’ on the authority of a Tukabahchee chief of his time,
declare that they had formerly been a distinct people. This ques-
tion will be considered again when we come to take up Tukabahchee
history, but it may be said that, even though the tribe were once
distinct, it would not necessarily follow that its language was also
different. There is, at all events, little reason to suppose it was
anything other than some Muskhogean dialect. A foreign origin
is also attributed to the Okchai Indians by the same writers.
Some of the hying Okchai appear to remember a tradition to this
effect, but while it is probably correct there is no further proof, and

there is no likelihood that their ancient speech was anything other

than Muskogee.?

Still another people, the Pakana, who now speak pure Muskogee,
are reported to have been at one time distinct, both by Adair‘ and
by Stiggins.6 Since they settled near Fort Toulouse, they have
sometimes been spoken of as if they were a branch of the Alabama, but
this is probably due merely to association. just as the Okchai have
occasionally been classed with the Alabama because an Alabama
town was known as Little Okchai. In the absence of more assured
information it will be best to class them with the Muskogee.

Northern Florida was occupied by the Timucua Indians, but
south of them were several tribes, which were reckoned as distinct
by the Spaniards, though next to nothing has been preserved of their
languages and very few hints regarding their affinities are to be
found.

The Calusa of the western side of the peninsula were the most
important South Florida people, and they were the last to disappear,
some of them remaining in their old seats until the close of the last
Seminole war. The chief centers of their population were Charlotte
Harbor and the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, and this is of
importance in connection with the following facts. In a letter writ-
ten by Capt. John H. Bell, agent for the Indians in Florida, addressed

1 Milfort, Mémoire, pp. 265-266.

2 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 179.

8 Milfort and Adair, Ibid. There is one direct statement to the effect that Okchai was a distinct lan-
guage (Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., Ist ser., 1, p. 48), but the language of the Little Okchai (Alabama) may
be meant (see next paragraph).

4 Adair, ibid., p. 257.

6 See p. 272.

28 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

to a committee of Congress, February, 1821, a list of Seminole towns
is given.!| The names of the first 22 are ‘extracted from a talk held
by Gen. Jackson, with three chiefs of the Florida Indians, at Pensa-
cola, September 19, 1821,” and to them,Captain Bell adds 13 towns
on his own authority. The particular tribe of Seminole represented
in each town is not always given, but it is appended in italics to the
names of the last five. Thus there is a town of the Mikasuki, a town
of the Coweta, a town of the Chiaha, a town of the Yuchi, and last of
all we read ‘‘35. South of Tampa, near Charlotte’s Bay, Choctaws.”
Later still, in a census of the Florida Indians taken in 1847, there
were 120 warriors reported, among whom were 70 Seminole, 30
Mikasuki, 12 Creeks, 4 Yuchi, and 4 Choctaw.? The only Mississippi
Choctaw actually known to have been brought into Florida were
taken there along with some Delaware Indians as scouts for the
American Army, and at a much later date than the letter of Captain
Bell. Moreover, from both Bell’s account and the census of 1847
the Choctaw enumerated would appear to have formed a considerable
band, and it may well be asked why it is, if the scouts were brought
in in such quantities, we do not hear of a Delaware band as well?
These references therefore introduce the question of a possible con-
nection between the Calusa and Choctaw.

All that is now known of the Calusa language is a considerable
number of place names, for a few of which translations are given,
and a single expression, also translated. Practically all of these come
from the Memoir of Hernando de Escalante Fontaneda, a Spaniard
held captive among the Calusa Indians for 17 years, somewhere
between 1550 and 1570.% Attempts to find equivalents in known
Indian tongues have been made by Buckingham Smith (1854) and
A. S. Gatschet (1884). Although better equipped for this task, the
latter was handicapped, as always, by a lack of critical acumen in
the treatment of etymologies, and unfortunately he chose for com-
parison Spanish, Timucua, and Creek, the two last because they
were the Indian languages of the region with which he was most
familiar. Smith, on the other hand, without a tithe of Gatschet’s
philological ability, was favored by fortune in happening to depend
for his interpretations on several Choctaw Indians, including the
famous chief, Peter Pichlynn. Smith seems not to have had any
true appreciation of the differences between Indian languages and
to have assumed that the authority of an. Indian of almost any
southeastern tribe was equally good. By mere luck, however, he

1 Morse, Rep. to Sec. of War., pp. 306, 308, 311; also see pp. 406-407.

2 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, I, p. 522.

3 Col. Doc. Ined., v, pp. 532-546; Smith, Letter of Hernando de Soto and Memoir of Hernando de Esca-
lante Fontaneda. The translation in French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, pp. 235-265, is badly disarranged.

4 Smith, op. cit.; Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg.,1, p. 14.

ee oe eee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 29

chose a representative of that tribe with which we have since dis-
covered grounds for believing the Calusa stood in a particularly close
relation. But even so, he was unable to obtain interpretations for
most of Fontaneda’s Calusa names, and most of the remaining ety-
mologies suggested to him must be rejected as improbable. Yet it
is interesting to note that the impression made upon his informants
by these names was similar to that certain to be impressed upon
anyone familiar with the Muskhogean tongues. He says: ‘‘My
monitors say that all these words are eminently Chahta in their
sounds, but that sometimes they are too imperfectly preserved to
be understood, or that their sense can be detected only in part.”
Of the translations obtained by Smith of names not furnished with
interpretations by Fontaneda only that of Calaobe (from kali hofobi,
“deep spring’’) and perhaps that of Soco (from su’ko, “‘muscadine”’)
seem to have some probability in their favor. Translations are,
however, furnished for a few by Fontaneda himself, and while the
literal correctness of these must not be assumed, they present a
somewhat more promising field of investigation. These words are
Guaragunve, a town on the Florida keys, the name of which is said
to mean in Spanish Pueblo de Llanto, i. e., “the town of weeping;”
Cuchiyaga, a second town on these islands, the name signifying
“the place where there has been suffering;’’ Calos or Calusa, “in
the language of which the word signifies a fierce people, as they are
called for being brave and skilled in war;’’ the Lake of Mayaimi,
so called ‘‘ because it is very large;’’ Zertepe, ‘‘chief and great lord”’
(though possibly this is a specific title); Guasaca-esgui, a name of
the Suwanee, “the river of canes; No or Non, ‘town beloved;”’
Cafogacola, or Cafiegacola, “a crafty people, skillful with the bow;”
se-le-te-ga, ‘‘run to the lookout, see if there be any people coming!”

The first of the above is almost the only one in which an r appears—
though Carlos is used for Calos occasionally—and it is possible that
this town may be one which Fontaneda informs us to have
been occupied by Cuban Arawaks. In English the name would
be pronounced nearly as Waragunwe, and if we assume the r
has been substituted for an original 7, we might find a cognate
for the first part of it in Choctaw wilanli, to weep, while
the second part might be compared with Choctaw kowi or ko™wi,
woods, a desert, but I do not feel sure that this order is per-
missible, and little confidence can be placed in the rendering.
For Cuchiyaga Smith’s informants suggested ku-chi (cha) ya-ya,

“going out to wail,’ though he remarks that the interpreta-

tions of the names of this town and the preceding may have
become transposed. Calos was explained to Smith as an abbrevia-
tion of the Choctaw words ka-la and lu-sa, “strong (and) black,”

30 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

but the form without a terminal a seems to be nearer the original,
and I would suggest kallo, strong, powerful, or violent, followed by
an article pronoun such as ash, the aforesaid, or osh. In case the
final a were original the second word in the compound might be
a"sha, to sit, to be. Mayaimi recalls Choctaw maiha, wide, and
mith, it is so, it is like that, although mih is usually initial in position.
I can do nothing with Zertepe, but, as suggested, this may not be
a generic word. Guasaca-esgui should probably be pronounced
Wasaka-esgi, and both parts bear a strong resemblance to the Choc-
taw uski or oski, cane, though of course, in any case, only one would
represent that word; the Choctaw word for river is hacha. In expla-
nation of No, Gatschet cites Creek anokitcha, “lover,” anukidshis,
“T love,” the Choctaw equivalent of which is anushkunna, no or nu
being assumed as the radix, but anoa, “famous,” ‘noted,’ ‘‘illus-
trious,’”’” may also be mentioned in this connection. Perhaps the
most suggestive of all of these words is Cafiogacola, because the
ending looks suspiciously ike Choctaw okla, people, which we often
find written by early travelers ogala or okala. The first part might
be explained by Alabama kafigo, not good, bad, or as a shortened
form of Choctaw ikana keyu, unfriendly. Finally, se-le-te-ga may
contain cheli, you fly, you go rapidly, followed by -t, used in con-
necting several verbs, and possibly haiaka, to appear, to peep,
though I am not certain that this particular combination is admissible.

Romans is the only writer to attempt an interpretation of names
along the southeastern Florida coast. He gives the name of Indian
River as Aisa hatcha and interprets this as meaning ‘‘ Deer River.”’ !
The word hatcha, however, was probably given by himself or else
obtained from the Seminole Indians and there is no proof that it
belonged to the ancient language of Ais, while the first was probably
translated arbitrarily in terms of the Choctaw language with which
Romans was to some extent familiar.

Upon the whole more resemblances between these words and
Choctaw seem to occur than would be expected if the languages
had nothing in common, and those which we find in Guasaca-esgui
and Cafiogacola are almost too striking to be merely accidental.
In connection with the first of these reference should be made to
the name of a province mentioned only once by Fontaneda and
seemingly located near Tampa Bay. This is Osiquevede, in which
it is possible we again have oski. The latter part of the word might
be interpreted by means of Choctaw jitiha, to whirl or veer about.

Putting all of the above evidence together, we may fairly conclude
that a connection with Choctaw, or at all events some Muskhogean
dialect, is indicated, but we must equally admit that it is not proved.

1 Romans, Concise Nat. Hist. of E, and W. Fla., p. 273.

:
~y
;

i ee eel

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 31

In the interior of the country, about Lake Okeechobee, were many
towns said to be allied with the Calusa chief, and from the names of
these towns given us by Fontaneda they would appear to have been
allied in language also.*

On the east coast of Florida were a number of small tribes settled
in the various inlets. From south to north the most important were
the Tekesta, Jeaga, and Ais. The name Tekesta resembles those of
the Calusa towns in appearance, and so do the names of several
smaller places in the same locality, one town, Janar, even having a
designation absolutely identical with that of a Calusa settlement?

We know little more of the Jeaga* and Ais. They had many
cultural features in common with the Calusa—including a uniform
hostility to Christian missions—and their languages were at least
markedly different from Timucua. In 1605 the governor of Florida,
in commenting on the visit of some Ais Indians to St. Augustine,
says that the language spoken in that province was “‘very different
from this”? (i. e., Timucua). He conversed with them by means of
Juan de Junco, an Indian of the Timucua mission of Nombre de Dios,
who spoke to the interpreter of the Surruque, a tribe living about
Cape Canaveral. We might assume from this that the Surruque
spoke the same language as the people of Ais, but many of them
were familiar with Ais on account of the proximity of the two peoples,
and I am inclined to regard the Surruque as the southernmost band
of Timuqua upon the Atlantic coast.

The linguistic position of the Tamahita Indians is uncertain, but
there is some reason to think that their name will prove to be another
synonym for Yuchi. This possibility will be discussed at length
when we come to consider the history of that tribe.

THE CUSABO
History

Little as we know about these people, it is a curious fact that their
territory was one of the first in North America on which European
settlements were attempted, and these were of historical importance
and even celebrity. They were made, moreover, by three different
nations, the Spaniards, French, and English.

The first visitors were the Spaniards, who made a landing here in
1521, only eight years after Ponce de Leon’s assumed? discovery of
Florida. Accounts of this voyage, more or less complete, have

1 Fontaneda in Col. Doc. Ined., v., p. 539; see pp. 331-333.
2 See p. 333.
‘The Spanish orthography of this word is retained; it was pronounced something like Heaga.

oe BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

been given by Peter Marytr,! Gomara,? Oviedo,’® and Herrera,‘ and
in more recent times by Navarrete,> Henry Harrisse,° John Gilmary
Shea,’ and Woodbury Lowery. That of Shea is based largely on
original manuscripts, and, as it contains all of the essential facts, I
will quote it in full.

In 1520 Lucas Vasquez de Ayllon, one of the auditors of the Island of St. Domingo,
though possessed of wealth, honors, and domestic felicity, aspired to the glory of
discovering some new land, and making it the seat of a prosperous colony. Having
secured the necessary license, he despatched a caravel under the command of Fran-
cisco Gordillo, with directions to sail northward through the Bahamas, and thence
strike the shore of the continent. Gordillo set out on his exploration, and near the
Island of Lucayoneque, one of the Lucayuelos, descried another caravel. His pilot,
Alonzo Fernandez Sotil, proceeded toward it in a boat, and soon recognized it as a
caravel commanded by a kinsman of his, Pedro de Quexos, fitted out in part, though
not avowedly, by Juan Ortiz de Matienzo, an auditor associated with Ayllon in the
judiciary. This caravel wasreturning from an unsuccessful cruise among the Bahamas
for Caribs—the object of the expedition being to capture Indians in order to sell them
as slaves. On ascertaining the object of Gordillo’s voyage, Quexos proposed that
they should continue the exploration together. After a sail of eight or nine days, in
which they ran little more than a hundred leagues, they reached the coast of the
continent at the mouth of a considerable river, to which they gave the name of St.
John the Baptist, from the fact that they touched the coast on the day set apart to
honor the Precursor of Christ. The year was 1521, and the point reached was, accord-
ing to the estimate of the explorers, in latitude 33° 30’.

Boats put off from the caravels and landed some twenty men on the shore; and
while the ships endeavored to enter the river, these men were surrounded by Indians,
whose good-will they gained by presents.

Some days later, Gordillo formally took possession of the country in the name of
Ayllon, and of his associate Diego Caballero, and of the King, as Quexos did also in
the name of his employers on Sunday, June 30, 1521. Crosses were cut on the trunks
of trees to mark the Spanish occupancy.

Although Ayllon had charged Gordillo to cultivate friendly relations with the
Indians of any new land he might discover, Gordillo joined with Quexos in seizing
some seventy of the natives, with whom they sailed away, without any attempt to
make an exploration of the coast.

On the return of the vessel to Santo Domingo, Ayllon condemned his captain’s
act; and the matter was brought before a commission, presided over by Diego Colum-
bus, for the consideration of some important affairs. The Indians were declared free,
and it was ordered that they should be restored to their native land at the earliest
possible moment. Meanwhile they were to remain in the hands of Ayllon and Ma-
tienzo.?

Another account of this expedition is given by Peter Martyr,!
from whom Gomara and nearly all subsequent writers copied it.

1 Peter Martyr, De Orbe Novo,n, pp. 255-271.

2 Gomara, Hist. de las Indias, p. 32

3 Oviedo, Hist. Gen., m1, pp. 624-€33.

4 Herrera, Hist. Gen.,1, pp. 259-261.

5 Navarrete, Col., m, pp. 69-74.

6 Harrisse, Disc. of N. Amer., pp. 198-213

7Im Winsor, Narr. and Crit. Hist. Amer., 11, pp. 238-241.
8 Lowery, Span. Sett]., 1513-1561, pp. 153-157, 160-168.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 33

While it is not fortified with official documents like that of Shea it
comes from a contemporary and one intimately acquainted with all
of the principals and therefore deserves to be placed beside the other
as an original source of information.

Some Spaniards, anxious as hunters pursuing wild beasts through the mountains
and swamps to capture the Indians of that archipelago [the Bahamas], embarked on
two ships built at the cost of seven of them. They sailed from Puerto de Plata situated
on the north coast of Hispaniola, and laid their course towards the Lucayas. Three
years have passed since then, and it is only now, in obedience to Camillo Gallino, who
wishes me to acquaint Your Excellency with some still unknown particulars concerning
these discoveries, that I speak of this expedition. These Spaniards visited all the
Lucayas but without finding the plunder, for their neighbors had already explored
the archipelago and systematically depopulated it. Not wishing to expose them-
selves to ridicule by returning to Hispaniola empty-handed, they continued their
course towards the north. Many people said they lied when they declared they had
purposely chosen that direction.

They were driven by a sudden tempest which lasted two days, to within sight of a
lofty promontory which we will later describe. When they landed on this coast, the
natives, amazed at the unexpected sight, regarded it as a miracle, for they had never
seen ships. At first they rushed in crowds to the beach, eager to see; but when the
Spaniards took to their shallops, the natives fled with the swiftness of the wind, leaving
the coast deserted. Our compatriots pursued them and some of the more agile and
swift-footed young men got ahead and captured a man and a woman, whose flight had
been less rapid. They took them on board their ships and after giving them clothing,
released them. Touched by this generosity, serried masses of natives again appeared
on the beach.

When their sovereign heard of this generosity, and beheld for the first time these
unknown and precious garments—for they only wear the skins of lions and other wild
beasts—he sent fifty of his servants to the Spaniards, carrying such provisions as they
eat. When the Spaniards landed, he received them respectfully and cordially, and
when they exhibited a wish to visit the neighborhood, he provided them with guide
and an escort. Wherever they showed themselves the natives, full of admiration,
advanced to meet them with presents, as though they were divinities to be worshipped.
What impressed them most was the sight of the beards and the woolen and silk clothing.

But what then! The Spaniards ended by violating this hospitality. For when
they had finished their explorations, they enticed numerous natives by lies and tricks
to visit their ships, and when the vessels were quickly crowded with men and women
they raised anchor, set sail, and carried these despairing unfortunates into slavery.
By such means they sowed hatred and warfare throughout that peaceful and friendly
region, separating children from their parents and wives from their husbands. Nor
is this all. Only one of the two ships returned, and of the other there has been no
news. As the vessel was old, it is probable that she went down with all on board,
innocent and guilty. This spoliation occasioned the Royal council at Hispaniola
much vexation, but it remained unpunished. It was first thought to send the
prisoners back, but nothing was done, because the plan would have been difficult to
realise, and besides one of the ships was lost.

These details were furnished me bya virtuous priest, learned in law, called the bache-
lor Alvares de Castro. His learning and his virtues caused him to be named Dean of
the Cathedral of Concepcion, in Hispaniola, and simultaneously vicar and inquisitor.

148061 °—22——3

34 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Thus his testimony may be confidently accepted. .. . It is from Castro’s report and
after several enquiries into this seizure that we have learned that the women brought from
that region wear lions’ skins and the men wear skins of all other wild beasts. He says
these people are white and larger than the generality of men. When they were landed
some of them searched among the rubbish heaps along the town ditches for decaying
bodies of dogs and asses with which to satisfy their hunger. Most of them died of
misery, while those who survived were divided among the colonists of Hispaniola,
_ who disposed of them as they pleased, either in their houses, the gold-mines, or their
fields.

Farther on Peter Martyr gives Ayllon, ‘‘one of those at whose
expense the two ships had been equipped,” and his Indian servant,
Francisco of Chicora, as additional informants, and states that he
had sometimes invited them to his table.

In 1523 Ayllon obtained a royal cédula securing to him exclusive
right of settlement within the limits of a strip of coast on either side
of the place where his subordinate had come to land. In 1525, being
unable to visit the new land himself, in order to secure his rights he
sent two caravels to explore his territory under Pedro de Quexos.
‘‘They regained the good will of the natives,” says Shea, ‘‘and explored
the coast for 250 leagues, setting up stone crosses with the name of
Charles V and the date of the act of taking possession. They
returned to Santo Domingo in July, 1525, bringing one or two Indians
from each province, who might be trained to act as interpreters.” 1
After considerable delay Ayllon himself sailed for his new government
early in June, 1526, with three large vessels, 600 persons of both
sexes, including priests and physicians, and 100 horses. They
reached the North American coast at the mouth of a river calcu-
lated by them to be in north latitude 33° 40’, and they called it the
Jordan—from the name of one of Ayllon’s captains, it is said. Here,
however, Ayllon lost one of his vessels, and his interpreters, including
Francisco of Chicora, deserted him. Dissatisfied with the region in
which he had landed and obtaining news of one better from a party
he had sent along the shore, Ayllon determined to remove, and he
seems to have followed the coast. The explorers are said to have
continued for 40 or 45 leagues until they came to a river called
Gualdape, where they began a settlement, which was called San
Miguel deGualdape. The land hereabout was flat and full of marshes.
The river was large and well stocked with fish, but the entrance was
shallow and passable only at high tide. The colony did not prosper,
the weather became severe, many sickened and died, and on October
18, 1526, Ayllon died also. Trouble soon broke out among the sur-
viving colonists and finally, in the middle of a severe winter, those
that were left sailed back to Hispaniola.’

Shea, op. cit., p. 240. 2Tbid., p. 241.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 35

Such are the principal facts concerning the first Spanish explora-
tions and attempts at colonization upon the coast of the Carolinas.
Before giving the information obtained through them regarding the
aborigines of the country and their customs it will be necessary to
determine as nearly as possible the location of the three rivers men-
tioned in the relations, the River of St. John the Baptist, the River
Jordan, and the River Gualdape, an undertaking which has been
attempted already in the most painstaking manner, by the historians
Harrisse, Shea, and Lowery.'

So far as the River Jordan is concerned, there is scarcely the
shadow of a doubt that it was the Santee. The identification is
indicated by evidence drawn from a great many early writers, and
practically demonstrated by the statements of two or three of the
more careful navigators. Ecija, for instance, places its mouth in
N. lat. 33° 11’, which is almost exactly correct.?, A very careful
pilot’s description appended to the account of his second voyage
puts it only a little higher. Furthermore, tribes that can be iden-
tified readily as the Sewee and Santee are mentioned by him and
they are on this river in the positions they later occupied. He
states also, on the authority of the Indians, that a trail led from the
mouth of it to a town near the mountains called Xoada, which is
readily recognizable as the Siouan Cheraw tribe.2, Now, as Mr.
Mooney has shown,’ and as all evidence indicates, the Cheraw were
at this time at the head of Broad River. The Pedee or the Cape
Fear would have carried travelers to the Cheraw miles out of their
way. Finally it must be remembered that the name Jordan was
applied to a certain river during the entire Spanish period in the
Southeast. It had a definite meaning, and when the English settled
the country Spanish cartographers were at no loss to identify their
Jordan under its new English name, so that Navarrete says that
‘‘on some ancient maps there is a river at thirty-three degrees North,
which they name Jordan or Santée.”’ * One of the reasons for uncer-
tainty regarding it is the fact that the ancient Cape San Roman,
from which the Jordan is frequently located, is not the present Cape
Romain, but apparently Cape Fear, and is thus universally repre-
sented as north of the Jordan instead of south of it. The argument
could be elaborated at-length, but it is unnecessary. The burden of
proof is rather on him who would deny the identification.

With regard to the other two rivers we have no such certain evi-
dence, and their exact positions will probably always remain in doubt.

1 Op. cit. 3 Bull. 22, Bur. Amer. Ethn., p. 57.
2 Lowery, MSS., Lib. Cong. 4 Navarrete, Col., m1, p. 70.

36 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The cédula issued to Ayllon places the newly discovered land in
which was the River of St. John the Baptist in N. lat. 35°-37°,! but
for anything like an exact statement we must depend entirely on the
testimony of the pilot Quexos, who estimated that it lay considerably
farther south, in N. lat. 33° 30’.2. It would therefore be somewhere
in the immediate neighborhood of the Jordan, possibly that very
stream. However, immediately after the statement of Navarrete
quoted above, he adds, ‘‘to the northeast of that which they name
Santee, at a distance of 48 miles, there is another river, which they
eall Chico.”* This would at once suggest an identification of that
stream with the Pedee, or with Winyah Bay, though of course where
they enter the ocean the Santee and Pedee are much nearer together
than 48 miles. JI am, however, inclined to suspect that “‘the river
Chico”’ represented simply some cartographer’s guess as to the loca-
tion of Chicora, and was not, as Navarrete seems to assume farther
on, itself the original of the term Chicora.

The general position is, however, indicated by another line of
evidence. It will be remembered that among the Indians carried.
off by Gordillo and Quexos from the River of St. John the Baptist
in 1521 was one who received the name Francisco of Chicora, who
related such wonderful tales of the new country that many Spaniards,
including the historian Oviedo, believed that no confidence could
be reposed in him.‘ His remarkable story of tailed men, however,
Mr. Mooney and the writer have been able to establish as an element
in the mythology of the southern Indians, and enough of the ‘“ prov-
inces”’ which he mentioned are identifiable to show that the names
are not the pure fabrication which Oviedo supposed.

So far as I am aware there are but three original sources for the
complete list of provinces—two in the Documentos Ineditos* and
the third in Oviedo.* An equally ancient authority for part of them,
however, is Peter Martyr.’ I give these in the following compara-
tive table, and in addition the lists from Navarrete,’ and Barcia,?
who had access to the original documents.

JNavarrete, Col., 01, p. 153; Doc. Ined., xxm, p. 79.
‘Shea in Winsor, Narr. and Crit. Hist., 1, p. 239.
‘Navarrete, Col., m1, p. 70.

4Oviedo, Hist. Gen., p. 628.

6 Vols. XIV, p, 506, and xxW, p. 82.

6 Hist. Gen., MI,.628.

7 Peter Martyr, De Orbe Novo, U1, pp. 259-261.

8 Navarrete, Col., ut, p. 154.
» Barcia, La Florida, pp. 4-5.

oY. 's

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 87
No.| Doe. Ined. xIv|| ee Oviedo. Peter Martyr. Navarrete. sarcia.
i | Duaché ........| Duache.....-. PUBNG ss ee Duhare or Du- | Suache......... Duaarhe.
| harhe.
Awenicorass. 3 | Clricora. ‘53. @hicorsis:2.2.- Chicora .| Chicora. .......| Chicora.
4152): | ADIT S S.8- o..4|| MADINA = = 5 - apinay.. 52 =-- 2 Xapira.
RE ae aie ee Pita fm AR Ts Se El NE I cee ey ame) (PS eer Sei Ae
ace 5 re RS Mibdhe sot ee eee ae Mipha-s. 25. Ytha.
Tatancal ...... | Be EE ne 5 | ES hy SORE Ee Hee ES y Tatancal..... | date. 5 Sere Re Lys
Th Se Se ee Daucal 2.2... RANCHO T. 2 re ge oe oh oo ak wate [BB Beeerecre sacar
(Oe oe it ED eee Anan a ees is | eee eee |(---b2-----22--0-
Anicatiya...... Subig (Cntr cated | PAR ale Ee aed Re a ee sic a et ee eET ES Ee
vO |g. TES | ee eee || eee eee Wihes: tee. 2 || Tihie,
Oo SASS EE Ae oe eee Tivecocayo eee ASC denne eon secre Bereoenace
S| Cocayo...-.... =... GAVOs Stee Io as ios oeee Wise seen samcaente COPRBVOs cee oe an |Eaaae ce aelenieemeceis
Jit leg cee bee aol Beda) ESE Bee aie eee Onotaihess.- -pyesas sete soko. Cohoth.
10 | Guacaya....... Quacaya...... Guacaya...... Guacaia....... Guacaya......- Xuacaya.
AS <r by ee 2 ese MORI se | A ee D4i3.c Rae otae pee 3 oo ee
PAROS ce ck. so <3" ] ome : SOMAS <2 cose eee sya semigeee see SONS assoeeciessc| eae t estas te aes
13 | Pasqui......... Wee ee thai Bi aaee CAPE eek Leesett PASQUictee tetee| Soceet scene ee ee
14 | Arambe........ Arambe......- ATranuls... 432% Arambe-....-- Arambe......-- Arambe.
15 | Xamunambe...| Xaminambe. .| Xamunanuc Xamunambe..| Xamunambe..-| Numunaunbe.
16 | Chuaque......- INUAO).,. -=220.2 MIAME ss oe < 2 skie aso = sere one < ELUAC scone | Rae a eee
Wi>|" Danzaca...2_.< .|Tancaea:<....: Tanaca Tanzacca Tanzaca Tamceca
18 | Yenyochol..... Mmros. vies: MeriyOhol ess sa 5 a. settee Ven VOU 3; 258 |e eee see
IGM Pag er. 322.5 Holpaos....... pahoe. ws. = Pahorsseee.nee i 24:70) ena Se ee rae Paor
20 | Amiscaron. .-.. Aunicoon..... WEMNISCAL OM 6 21 sas aise cts os,< a MAMISCALON! - <= |e= 3452 cee eee
A OUR seks. S Oia. 2s: F522 OTe See ee eee |e me Pee MI OCe Yee were
8 at an | See EEE age es SH eo eee Se err esa ae ee ee CoriXayn=Siis wastes ese
guanin.
ACUI Sr et | PAE Fe Pee OOP
PNET PSS ocene 5 Ynsiquanin . . A Imisipnanin. ==) Inzignanin’---|).o222 022202 ce - Ynsignavin.
Graninet 345i 3 iessordlas Pacis ys3sp ee [2 eats pe saad og aa eek lesa 04 | aeee }
23 | Anoxa AMOS. Ade +. Pea Cc >. <2 ae [ee os ee SO ee ANOKA 2b) $4 | ate Coe ee

The variants of these names enable us, by comparing them with

one another, to determine the originals with considerable certainty
in most cases, though some still remain in question.
structed, the list would be something like this: Duhare or Duache,
Chicora, Xapira or Xapida, Yta or Hitha, Tancal or Tancac, Anica,
Tiye or Tihe, Cocayo, Quohathe, Guacaya, Xoxi, Sona, Pasqui,

Arambe,

Xamunambe, Huaque,

Tanzaca,

Yenyohol,

As recon-

Pahoc or

Paor, Yamiscaron, Orixa, Insiguanin or Inziguanin, Anoxa.

Yamiscaron without doubt refers to the Yamasee Indians, the

ending probably being a Siouan suffix, and the whole possibly the
original of the name Yamacraw applied at a much later date to a
body of Indians at the mouth of the Savannah. There can be
little question also that Orixa is the later Spanish Orista, and English
Edisto, Cogayo the Coosa Indians of the upper courses of the rivers

of lower South Carolina, or perhaps the town of

1See p. 58.

‘““Cogapoy

38 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 73

and Xapira, or rather Xapida, Sampit. Pasqui is evidently
the Pasque of Ecija, which seems to have been imland near the
Waxaw Indians. The remaining names can not be identified
with such probability, but plausible suggestions may be made
regarding some of them. Thus Yta is perhaps the later Etiwaw
or Itwan, Sona may be Stono, which sometimes appears in the form
“Stonah,” and Guacaya is perhaps Waccamaw, gua in Spanish
being frequently employed for the English syllable wa. If Pahoc
is the correct form of the name of province 19 it may contain an
explanation of the ‘“‘ Backbooks”’ mentioned by Lawson,’ supposing
the form of the latter which Rivers gives, ‘‘Back Hooks,” is the
correct one.’

Two facts regarding this list have particular importance for us in
this investigation, first, the appearance of the phonetic 7 (in Duhare,
Chicora, Xapira, Arambe, Yamiscaron, Orixa), and, second, that all
of the provinces identified, all in fact for which an identification is
even suggested, are in the Cusabo country or the regions in close
contact with it. The first of these points indicates that Francisco
came from one of the eastern Siouan tribes, while the second would
show that he had considerable knowledge of the tribes south of them,
and thus points to some Siouan area not far removed. Since this
was also on the coast, the mouths of the Santee and Pedee are the
nearest points satisfying the requirements. It is true that there is
no lin Catawba, while two words ending in /—Tancal and Yenyohol—
occur in the list; but these may have been taken over intact from
Cusabo, or they may have been incorrectly copied, since Oviedo has
Tancac for the first of them. Winyah Bay or the Pedee River would
be indicated more definitely if Daxe, a town which the Indians told
Ecija was four days journey north, or rather northeast, of the Santee,
were identical with the Duache of the Ayllon colonists. But, how-
ever interesting it might be to establish the location of the river of
John the Baptist with precision, it makes no practical difference
in the present investigation whether it was the Santee or one of those
streams flowing into Winyah Bay. That it was one of them can
hardly be doubted.

The third river to be identified, Gualdape, is the most difficult of
all. This is due in the first place to an uncertainty as to which way
the settlers moved when they left the River Jordan. Oviedo, who
is our only authority on this point, says: ‘‘Despues que estovieron
alli algunos dias, descontentos de la tierra é ydas las lenguas 6 guias
que llevaron, acordaron de yrse 4 poblar la costa adelante hacia la
costa occidental, é fueron 4 un grand rio (quarenta 6 quarenta 6

cinco leguas de alli, pocas més 6 menos) que se dice Gualdape; é alli

1 Lawson, Hist. Carolina, p. 45. 2 Rivers, Hist. S. Car, p. 35.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 89

assentaron su campo 6 real en la costa dél.”’? (“After they had been
there for some days, being dissatisfied with the country and the
interpreters or guides having left them, they decided to go and settle
on the coast beyond, in the direction of the west coast; artd they went
to a large river, 40 or 45 leagues from that place, more or less, called
Gualdape; and there they established their camp or settlement on the
coast.’’)' Navarrete interprets this to mean that they traveled
north,? and he has been followed by both Harrisse* and Shea.* The
last is confirmed in his opinion by the narrative of Ecija, which
states that ‘““Guandape’’ was near where the English had estab-
lished their settlement;*® consequently he carries Ayllon from the
River Jordan all the way to Jamestown, in Virginia. It seems to
the writer, however, that the ‘‘English settlement”? to which Ecija
refers and which he places on an island must have been the Roanoke
colony, although in Ecija’s time it had been abandoned 20 years. But
in either case the distance from the mouth of the Pedee or Santee
was too great to be described as ‘‘40 or 45 leagues. ”’

On the other hand, there are good reasons for believing that Ayllon
did not move north after abandoning the River Jordan, but southwest.
It is unfortunate that Oviedo’s words are not clearer, but it seems to
the writer that the most natural interpretation of them is that the
settlers followed the coast westward, which would actually be in this
case toward the southwest. Lowery also comes to this conclusion,
but since he starts them from a different point—the mouth of the
Cape Fear River—he brings them no farther than the Pedee, our
starting point. To what Oviedo tells us of this movement Nava-
rrete adds the information, that the women and the sick were trans-
ported thither in boats while the remainder of the company made
their way by land.’ Lowery accepts this statement without ques-
tion,’ but Navarrete is not an absolutely reliable authority. His
information on this point can only have been drawn from unpub-
lished manuscripts, and unless we have some means of substantiating
it, it seems unsafe to assume a march of so many leagues when no
reason is presented why the Spaniards should not have taken to their
vessels. My belief is that they did so. But how much of the coast
is embraced in these 40 or 45 leagues it is impossible to say, for
often the ‘‘leagues’’ of these old relations are equivalent only to the
same number of miles. Thus Gualdape might be anywhere from 40
to 135 miles away, somewhere between Charleston Harbor and the
mouth of Savannah River.

Charleston Harbor itself seems to be excluded by the description
of the bar at the mouth of the river of Gualdape which the vessels

! Oviedo, Hist. Gen., M1, p. 628. 6 Tbid., p. 285.

? Navarrete, Col., M1, p. 723. 6 Lowery, Span. Settl., 1, pp. 165-166.
3 Harrisse, Disc. of N. Amer., p. 213. 7 Navarrete, Col., 01, p. 72.

* Shea in Winsor, Narr. and Crit. Hist. Amer., 0, p. 240. 8 Lowery, op. cit.

40 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

could cross only at high tide—‘‘la tierra toda muy Ilana é de muchas
ciénegas, pero el rio muy poderoso é de muchos é buenos pescados; é
A la entrada dél era baxo,si con la cresciente no entraban los navios.”’
(“The land very flat and with many swamps, but the river very pow-
erful and with many good fish, and at its entrance was a bar,so that
the vessels could enter only at flood tide.’”’)!' If Navarrete is right in
stating that the able-bodied men reached Gualdape by land I think
we must make a very conservative interpretation of the 40 or 45
leagues and assume miles rather than leagues. This would not
bring us farther than the neighborhood of Charleston Harbor. If,
however, we take the distance given by Oviedo at its face value it
carries us to the mouth of the Savannah. As a matter of fact we
can not know absolutely where this river lay. It might have been the
Stono, the North or South Edisto, the Coosawhatchie, the Broad, or
some less conspicuous stream. All of these have offshore bars, and
the channels into most are so narrow that they might not have been
discovered by the explorers, who therefore supposed that the Gual-
dape River could be entered only at high tide. But taking Oviedo’s
two statements, regarding the distance covered and the size of the
river, which was apparently of fresh water, I am inclined to believe
the Savannah to have been the river in question, because there are
two independent facts which tend to bear out this theory. In the
first place the companions of De Soto when at Cofitachequi dis-
covered glass beads, rosaries, and Biscayan axes, “from which they
recognized that they were in the government or territory where the
lawyer Lucas Vazquez de Ayllon came to his ruin.” So Ranjel.?
Biedma says in substance the same,? but what the Fidalgo of Elvas
tells us is more to the point: “In the town were found a dirk and
beads that had belonged to Christians, who, the Indians said, had
many years before been in the port, distant two day’s journey.’’*
Now Cofitachequi has usually been placed upon the Savannah
River, and ‘the port’? might naturally refer to that at its mouth.
At all events two days’ journey would not take the traveler very
far to the north or south of that river, nor is it likely that these
European articles had gotten many miles from the place where they
had been obtained. They might indeed have been secured from
the navigators who conducted the first or the second expedition or
from Ayllon when he was at “the River Jordan,” but on the first
voyage the dealings with the natives were very brief, and no rela-
tions with them seem to have been entered into while Ayllon and
his companions were at the Jordan on their last voyage. It is also
rather unlikely that so many Spanish articles should have reached
the Savannah from the mouth of the Pedee. In fact this is pre-

1 Oviedo, Hist. Gen., Mm, p. 628. 3 Ibid., p. 14.
2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 100. 4 Ibid., I, p. 67.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 41

cluded if the statement of the Indians quoted by Elvas is to be
relied upon. The second expedition was a mere reconnoissance and
the explorers do not seem to have stopped long in any one place.
The most natural conclusion is that Cofitachequi was not far from
the point where Ayllon had made his final and disastrous attempt
at colonization, and, as I have said, Cofitachequi is not usually
placed by modern students eastward of the Savannah. Secondly,
the name Gualdape, containing as it does the phonetic 1, would
seem not to have been in Siouan territory, but instead suggests a
name or set of names very common in Spanish accounts of the
Georgia coast. Thus Jekyl Island was known as Gualdaquini, and
St. Catherines Island was called Guale, a name adopted by the
Spaniards to designate the entire province. True, Oviedo seems
to place Gualdape in N. lat. 33° or even higher,! but this was
evidently an inference from the latitude given for the first landfall
at the River Jordan and his supposition that the coast ran east and
west. All things considered, it would seem most likely that the at-
tempted settlement of San Miguel de Gualdape was at or near the
mouth of Savannah River.

To sum up, then, if my identification of these places is absolutely,
or only approximately, correct the River of St. John the Baptist and
the River Jordan would be near the mouths of the Pedee and Santee,
and any ethnological information reported by the Spaniards from
this neighborhood would concern principally the eastern Siouan
tribes, while Gualdape would be near the mouth of the Savannah,
and any ethnological information from that neighborhood would
apply either to the Guale Indians or to the Cusabo.

Regarding the Indians of Chicora and Duhare a very interesting
and important account is preserved by Peter Martyr, who obtained
a large part of it directly from Francisco of Chicora himself and the
rest from Ayllon and his companions. This account has received
less credence than it deserves because the original has seldom been
- consulted, but instead Gomara’s narrative, an abridged and to some
extent distorted copy of that of Peter Martyr, and still worse repro-
ductions by later writers.2,_ Thus in the French translation of Gomara
we read that the priests of Chicora abstained from eating human
flesh (‘Ils ne mangent point de la chair humaine comme les autres’’),
while the original simply says “they do not eat flesh (no comen
earne).’’* The translation also informs us that the Chicoranos
made cheese from the milk of their women (“Ils font du fromage
du laict de leurs femmes’’), while the original states that they made

1 Oviedo, Hist. Gen., M1, p. 628. 3 Hist. Gen.. Paris, 1606, p. 53.
2 Gomara, Hist. de las Indias, chap. xLin, pp. 32-33. 4 Gomara, op. cit., p. 32.

49 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 73

it from the milk of does.’ But even in his original narrative

Gomara has “improved upon’’ Peter Martyr, since he tells us that
deer were kept in inclosures and sent out with shepherds, while
Peter Martyr merely states that the young were kept in the houses
and their mothers allowed to go out to pasture, coming back at
night to their fawns (see below). Out of a not altogether impossible
fact. we thus have a quite improbable story and utterly impossible
accessories developed. Although, as I have endeavored to show, these
people were probably Siouan, they were so near the Cusabo that
influences could readily pass from one to the other, and for that
reason and because the material has hitherto escaped ethnological
investigators I will append it.

Leaving the coast of Chicorana on one hand, the Spaniards landed in another country
called ‘‘ Duharhe.’’? Ayllon says the natives are white men,’ and his testimony is
confirmed by Francisco Chicorana. Their hair is brown and hangs to their heels.
They are governed by a king of gigantic size, called Datha, whose wife is as large as
himself. They have five children. In place of horses the king is carried on the
shoulders of strong young men, who run with him to the different places he wishes
to visit. At this point I must confess that the different accounts cause me to hesitate.
The Dean and Ayllon do not agree; for what one asserts concerning these young men
acting as horses, the other denies. The Dean said: ‘I have never spoken to anybody
who has seen these horses,’’ to which Ayllon answered, “I have heard it told by
many people,’ while Francisco Chicorana, although he was present, was unable to
settle this dispute. Could I act as arbitrator I would say that, according to the inves-
tigations I have made, these people were too barbarous and uncivilized to have horses.*
Another country near Duhare is called Xapida. Pearls are found there, and also a
kind of stone resembling pearls which is much prized by the Indians.

In all these regions they visited the Spaniards noticed herds of deer similar to our
herds of cattle. These deer bring forth and nourish their young in the houses of the
natives. During the daytime they wander freely through the woods in search of
their food, and in the evening they come back to their little ones, who have been —
cared for, allowing themselves to be shut up in the courtyards and even to be milked,
when they have suckled their fawns. The only milk the natives know is that of the
does, from which they make cheese. They also keep a great variety of chickens,
ducks, geese, and other similar fowls. They eat maize bread, similar to that of the
islanders, but they do not know the yucca root, from which cassabi, the food of the
nobles, is made. The maize grains are very like our Genoese millet, and in size are
as large as our peas. The natives cultivate another cereal called xathi. This is
believed to be millet but it is not certain, for very few Castilians know millet, as it is
nowhere grown in Castile. This country produces various kinds of potatoes, but
of small varieties.

The Spaniards speak of still other regions—Hitha, Xamunambe, and Tihe—all of
which are believed to be governed by the same king. In the last named the inhabit-

1 Gomara, op. cit., p. 33; Fr. trans., p. 53.

2? The reader will observe in this narrative that the many wonderful things widely reported of Chi-
cora really apply to Duhare.

3 Evidently Indians of lighter color.

‘ Peter Martyr makes the simple difficult. The custom was universal among southern tribes of carrying
chiefs and leading personages about in litters borne on the shoulders of several men.

° Of course these statements are erroneous, but there may have been individual cases of domestication
which furnished some foundation for such reports.

SWANTON] ~ EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 43

ants wear a distinctive priestly costume, and they are regarded as priests and vener-
ated as such by their neighbors. They cut their hair, leaving only two locks growing
on their temples, which are bound under the chin. When the natives make war
against their neighbors, according to the regrettable custom of mankind, these priests
are invited by both sides to be present, not as actors, but as witnesses of the conflict.
When the battle is about to open, they circulate among the warriors who are seated or
lying on the ground, and sprinkle them with the juice of certain herbs they have
chewed with their teeth; just as our priests at the beginning of the Mass sprinkle the
worshippers with a branch dipped in holy water. When this ceremony is finished, the
opposing sides fall upon one another. While the battle rages, the priests are left in
charge of the camp, and when it is finished they look after the wounded, making no
distinction between friends and enemies, and busy themselves in burying the dead.!
The inhabitants of this country do not eat human flesh; the prisoners of war are
enslaved by the victors.

The Spaniards have visited several regions of that vast country; they are called
Arambe, Guacaia, Quohathe, Tanzacca, and Pahor. The color of the inhabitants is
dark brown. None of them have any system of writing, but they preserve traditions
of great antiquity in rhymes and chants. Dancing and physical exercises are held in
honor, and they are passionately fond of ball games, in which they exhibit the greatest
skill. The women know how to spin and sew. Although they are partially clothed
with skins of wild beasts, they use cotton such as the Milanese call bombasio,? and
they make nets of the fiber of certain tough grasses, just as hemp and flax are used for
the same purposes in Europe.

There is another country called Inzignanin, whose inhabitants declare that, accord-
ing to the tradition of their ancestors, there once arrived amongst them men with tails
a meter long and as thick asaman’sarm. This tail was not movable like those of the
quadrupeds, but formed one mass as we see is the case with fish and crocodiles, and
was as hard asa bone. When these men wished to sit down, they had consequently
to have a seat with an open bottom; and if there was none, they had to dig a hole more
than a cubit deep to hold their tails and allow them to rest. Their fingers were as
long as they were broad, and their skin was rough, almost scaly. They ate nothing
but raw fish, and when the fish gave out they all perished, leaving no descendants.*
These fables and other similar nonsense have been handed down to the natives by
their parents. Let us now notice their rites and ceremonies.

The natives have no temples, but use the dwellings of their sovereigns as such. As
a proof of this we have said that a gigantic sovereign called Datha ruled in the prov-
ince of Duhare, whose palace was built of stone, while all the other houses were
built of lumber covered with thatch or grasses. In the courtyard of this palace, the
Spaniards found two idols as large as a three-year-old child, one male and one female.
These idols are both called Inamahari, and had their residence in the palace. Twice
each year they are exhibited, the first time at the sowing season, when they are
invoked to obtain successful result for their labors. We will later speak of the har-
vest. Thanksgivings are offered to them if the crops are good; in the contrary case
they are implored to show themselves more favorable the following year.

The idols are carried in procession amidst pomp, accompanied by the entire people.
It will not be useless to describe this ceremony. On the eve of the festival the king
has his bed made in the room where the idols stand, and sleeps in their presence. At
daybreak the people assemble, and the king himself carries these idols, hugging them

! There is some confusion here. Evidently the reference is toa class of doctors or shamans who performed
such offices, not to an entire tribe.

2 Probably this is a reference to the use of mulberry bark common among all southern tribes.

’ This is a native myth which Mr. Mooney has collected from the Cherokee, and I from the Alabama.
Possibly it is a myth regarding the alligator from people who had only heard of that reptile.

44 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY : [BULL. 73

to his breast, to the top of his palace, where he exhibits them to the people. He and
they are saluted with respect and fear by the people, who fall upon their knees or
throw themselves on the ground with loud shouts. The king then descends and
hangs the idols, draped in artistically worked cotton stuffs, upon the breasts of two
venerable men of authority. They are, moreover, adorned with feather mantles of
various colors, and are thus carried escorted with hymns and songs into the country,
while the girls and young men dance and leap. Anyone who stopped in his house
or absented himself during the procession would be suspected of heresy; and not only
the absent, but likewise any who took part in the ceremony carelessly and without
observing the ritual. The men escort the idols during the day, while during the
night the women watch over them, lavishing upon them demonstrations of joy and
respect. The next day they were carried back to the palace with the same ceremonies
with which they were taken out. If the sacrifice is accomplished with devotion and
in conformity with the ritual, the Indians believe they will obtain rich crops, bodily
health, peace, or if they are about to fight, victory, from these idols. Thick cakes,
similar to those the ancients made from flour, are offered to them. The natives are
convinced that their prayers for harvests will be heard, especially if the cakes are
mixed with tears.!

Another feast is celebrated every year when a roughly carved wooden statue is car-
ried into the country and fixed upon a high pole planted in the ground. This first
pole is surrounded by similar ones, upon which people hang gifts for the gods, each
one according to hismeans. At nightfall the principal citizens divide these offerings
among themselves, just as the priests do with the cakes and other offerings given them
by the women. Whoever offers the divinity the most valuable presents is the most
honored. Witnesses are present when the gifts are offered, who announce after the
ceremony what every one has given, just as notaries might doin Europe. Each one is
thus stimulated by a spirit of rivalry to outdo his neighbor. From sunrise till evening
the people dance round this statue, clapping their hands, and when nightfall has
barely set in, the image and the pole on which it was fixed are carried away and
thrown into the sea, if the country is on the coast, or into the river, if it is along a river’s
bank. Nothing more is seen of it, and each year a new statue is made.

The natives celebrate a third festival, during which, after exhuming a long-buried
skeleton, they erect a black tent out in the country, leaving one end open so that the
sky is visible; upon a blanket placed in the center of the tent they then spread out
the bones. Only women surround the tent, all of them weeping, and each of them
offers such gifts as she can afford. The following day the bones are carried to the tomb
and are henceforth considered sacred. As soon as they are buried, or everything is
ready for their burial, the chief priest addresses the surrounding people from the
summit of a mound, upon which he fulfills the functions of orator. Ordinarily he
pronounces a eulogy on the deceased, or on the immortality of the soul, or the future
life. He says that souls originally came from the icy regions of the north, where per-
petual snow prevails. They therefore expiate their sins under the master of that
region who is called Mateczungua, but they return to the southern regions, where
another great sovereign, Quexuga, governs. Quexuga is lame and is of a sweet and
generous disposition. He surrounds the newly arrived souls with numberless atten-
tions, and with him they enjoy a thousand delights; young girls sing and dance,
parents are reunited to children, and everything one formerly loved is enjoyed. The
old grow young and everybody is of the same age, occupied only in giving himself up
to joy and pleasure.?

1 This ceremony seems to correspond in intention to the Creek busk, but the form of it is quite different.
2 Compare with this the Chickasaw belief in a western quarter peopled by malevolent beings through
which the soul passes to the world of the sky deity above.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 45

Such are the verbal traditions handed down to them from their ancestors. They are
regarded as sacred and considered authentic. Whoever dared to believe differently
would be ostracised. These natives also believe that we live under the vault of
heaven; they do not suspect the existence of the antipodes. They think the sea has
its gods, and believe quite as many foolish things about them as Greece, the friend of
lies, talked about Nereids and othet marine gods—Glaucus, Phorcus, and the rest
of them.

When the priest has finshed his speech he inhales the smoke of certain herbs,
puffing it in and out, pretending to thus purge and absolve the people from their
sins. After this ceremony the natives return home, convinced that the inventions
of this impostor not only soothe the spirits, but contribute to the health of their bodies.
' Another fraud of the priests is as follows: When the chief is at death’s door and
about to give up his soul they send away all witnesses, and then surrounding his bed
they perform some secret jugglery which makes him appear to vomit sparks and
ashes. It looks like sparks jumping from a bright fire, or those sulphured papers,
which people throw into the air to amuse themselves. These sparks, rushing through
the air and quickly disappearing, look like those shooting stars which people call
leaping wild goats. The moment the dying man expires a cloud of those sparks
shoots up 3 cubits high with a noise and quickly vanishes. They hail this flame as
the dead man’s soul, bidding it a last farewell and accompanying its flight with their
wailings, tears, and funereal cries, absolutely convinced that it has taken its flight
to heaven. Lamenting and weeping they escort the body to the tomb.

Widows are forbidden to marry again if the husband has died a natural death;}!
but if he has been executed they may remarry. The natives like their women to be
chaste. They detest immodesty and are careful to put aside suspicious women.
The lords have the right to have two women, but the common people have only one.
The men engage in mechanical occupations, especially carpenter work and tanning
skins of wild beasts, while the women busy themselves with distaff, spindle, and
needle.

Their year is divided into 12 moons. Justice is administered by magistrates,
criminals and the guilty being severely punished, especially thieves. Their kings
are of gigantic size, as we have already mentioned. All the provinces we have named
pay them tributes and these tributes are paid in kind; for they are free from the pest
of money, and trade is carried on by exchanging goods. They love games, especially
tennis;? they also like metal circles turned with movable rings, which they spin on
a table, and they shoot arrows at a mark. They use torches and oil made from dif-
ferent fruits for illumination at night. They likewise have olive-trees.2 They
invite one another to dinner. Their longevity is great and their old age is robust.

They easily cure fevers with the juice of plants, as they also do their wounds, unless
the latter are mortal. They employ simples, of which they are acquainted with a
great many. When any of them suffers from a bilious stomach he drinks a draught
composed of a common plant called Guahi,* or eats the herb itself; after which he
immediately vomits his bile and feels better. This is the only medicament they
use, and they never consult doctors except experienced old women, or priests ac-
quainted with the secret virtues of herbs. They have none of our delicacies, and as
they have neither the perfumes of Araby nor fumigations nor foreign spices at their
disposition, they content themselves with what their country produces and live
happily in better health to a more robust old age. Various dishes and different foods
are not required to satisfy their appetites, for they are contented with little.

1 Probably with a time limitation like the Muskhogeans.

2 This, of course, refers to the great southern ball game.

3 Oil was extracted from acorns and several kinds of nuts. One of these is evidently intended.
4 Perhaps the Jler vomitoria from which the ‘‘black drink’’ was brewed.

46 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

It is quite laughable to hear how the people salute the lords and how the king
responds, especially to his nobles. As a sign of respect the one who salutes puts
his hands to his nostrils and gives a bellow like a bull, after which he extends his
hands toward the forehead and in front of the face. The king does not bother to
return the salutes of his people, and responds to the nobles by half bending his head
toward the left shoulder without saying anything.

I now come to a fact which will appear incredible to your excellency. You
already know that the ruler of this region is a tyrant of gigantic size. How does it
happen that only he and his wife have attained this extraordinary size? No one of
their subjects has explained this to me, but I have questioned the above-mentioned
licenciate Ayllon, a serious and responsible man, who had his information from those
who had shared with him the cost of the expedition. I likewise questioned the
servant Francisco, to whom the neighbors had spoken. Neither nature nor birth
has given these princes the advantage of size as an hereditary gift; they have acquired
it by artifice. While they are still in their cradles and in charge of their nurses,
experts in the matter are called, who by the application of certain herbs, soften their
young bones. During a period of several days they rub the limbs of the child with
these herbs, until the bones become as soft as wax. They then rapidly bend them
in such wise that the infant is almost killed. Afterwards they feed the nurse on
foods of a special virtue. The child is wrapped in warm covers, the nurse gives it
her breast and revives it with her milk, thus gifted with strengthening properties.
After some days of rest the lamentable task of stretching the bones is begun anew.
Such is the explanation given by the servant, Francisco Chicorana.

The Dean of La Concepcion, whom | have mentioned, received from the Indians
stolen on the vessel that was saved explanations differmg from those furnished to
Ayllon and his associates. These explanations dealt with medicaments and other
means used for increasing the size. There was no torturing of the bones, but a very
stimulating diet composed of crushed herbs was used. This diet was given princi-
pally at the age of puberty, when it is nature’s tendency to develop, and sustenance
is converted into flesh and bones. Certainly it is an extraordinary fact, but we must
remember what is told about these herbs, and if their hidden virtues could be learned
I would willingly believe in their efficacy. We understand that only the kings are
allowed to use them, for if anyone else dared to taste them, or to obtain the recipe of
this diet, he would be guilty of treason, for he would appear to equal the king. It is
considered, after a fashion, that the king should not be the size of everybody else,
for he should look down upon and dominate those who approach him. Such is the
story told to me, and I repeat it for what it is worth. Your excellency may believe
it or not.

I have already sufficiently described the ceremonies and customs of these natives.
Let us now turn our attention to the study of nature. Bread and meat have been
considered; let us devote our attention to trees.

There are in this country virgin forests of oak, pine, cypress, nut and almond trees,
amongst the branches of which riot wild vines, whose white and black grapes are
not used for wine-making, for the people manufacture their drinks from other fruits.
There are likewise fig-trees and other kinds of spice-plants. ‘The trees are improved
by grafting, just as with us; though without cultivation they would continue in a
wild state. The natives cultivate gardens in which grows an abundance of vegeta-
bles, and they take an interest in growing their orchards. They even have trees in
their gardens. One of these trees is called the corito, of which the fruit resembles a
small melon in size and flavor. Another called guacomine bears fruit a little larger

than a quince of a delicate and remarkable odor, and which is very wholesome. They
plant and cultivate many other trees and plants, of which I shall not speak further,
lest by telling everything at one breath | become monotonous. !

1 Peter Martyr, De Orbe Novo, Il, pp. 259-269. .

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS AT

In this narrative there appears to be very little not based on fact.
The sharp-tailed people are, as noted, still believed in by the southern
Indians, from which we may infer that the story regarding them was
known throughout the South. As to the receipts for making giants
they are such as any Indian might believe efficacious and where great
stature happened to follow assume that his treatment had been the
efficient cause, and when it did not that the fault did not lie with
the medicines. The notion that deer were herded and milked might
very well have originated in the fact that the Spaniards encountered
pet animals in certain of the villages they visited. The ceremonials
described are the reverse of improbable. The reverence for a male
and a female deity connected with sowing and harvesting would
seem to be the result of a natural association of sexual processes with
germination in the vegetable world; and the ceremonies over the
bones of the dead recall what Lawson tells us of the separation of the
flesh from the bones among the Santee and interment in mounds. It
is a curious and interesting fact that, although the name Chicora
appears most prominently in subsequent histories and charts, so as to
give its name to a large part of the Carolinas, Peter Martyr, the
original authority for most that has been said about that country,
assigns it a very subordinate position. As already noted, the greater
part of what he has to tell applies to Duhare, the second province
visited by the Spaniards, and he seems to say that all of the provinces
which he mentions! were subject to the king of Duhare and paid
him tribute. At least he says as much for Hitha, Xamunambe,
and Tihe. Of course no reliance can be placed upon tales of sub-
jection and the exaction of tribute, but at least Duhare was plainly a
very important country at that time, distinctly overshadowing Chi-
cora. Whatissaid about the people of Tihe being, as it were, a race
of priests is interesting, and may mean that they were of a differ-
ent stock. It is probable that Inzignanin (or rather Inziguanin),
the inhabitants of which told about the race of sharp-tails, was a
province farther south than the others, perhaps in the Cusabo or
Guale country, but so far it has been impossible to identify it.
Chicora and Duhare were evidently upon the coast, but how far apart
we donot know. Unfortunately Peter Martyr does not tell us whether
the Spaniards turned north or south from Chicora in going to the
latter province. We may feel pretty certain that both were in
Siouan territory, but more than that we can not say with any degree
of assurance.

For information regarding the people of Gualdape we must consult
Oviedo. While, as we have said, the quotations made from Peter
Martyr evidently apply to some of the eastern Siouan tribes, we now

1 See p: 43.

48 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

come to Indians almost certainly of Muskhogean stock. The follow-
ing is Oviedo’s description:

The country of Gualdape, as well as from the river of Santa Elena toward the west,
is all level. The Spaniards who came with the licentiate Ayllon did not see the vil-
lages; they only met with a few isolated houses or cabins forming little hamlets, at
great distances one from the other. Onsome of the small islands on the coast there are
certain mosques or temples of those idolatrous people and many remains [bones] of
their dead, those of the elders apart from those of the young people or children. They
look like the ossuaries or burying places of the common people; the bodies of their
principal people are in temples by themselves or in little chapels in another community
and also on little islands. And those houses or temples have walls of stone and mortar
(which mortar they make of oyster shells) and they are about one estado and a half in
height,! the rest of the building above this wall being made of wood (pine). There
are many pines there. There are several principal? houses all along the coast and
each one of them must be considered by those people to be a village, for they are very
big and they are constructed of very tall and beautiful pines, leaving the crown of
leaves at the top. After having set up one row of trees to form one wall, they set up
the opposite side, leaving a space between the two sides of from 15 to 30 feet, the
length of the walls being 300 or more feet. As they intertwine the branches at the
top and so in this manner there is no need for a tiled roof or other covering, they
cover it all with matting interwoven between the logs where there may be hollows
or open places. Furthermore they can cross those beams with other [pines] placed
lengthwise on the inside, thus increasing the thickness of their walls. In this way the
wall is thick and strong, because the beams are very close together. In each one of
those houses there is easily room enough for 200 men and in Indian fashion they can
live in them, placing the opening for the door where it is most convenient.’

Lower down Oviedo mentions ‘‘blackberries, which, being dried,
the Indians keep to eat in the winter.’’* This is practically all the
ethnological information which the historians of the Ayllon expedi-
tions furnish. It is interesting to find the mat communal house,
which does not appear to have been used by the Creeks, in existence
so far south, but Oviedo is probably in error in representing the walls
as constructed of living trees. The ossuaries described show that
the custom of erecting them, so common along the lower Mississippi,
extended eastward as far as the Atlantic.

Our next information regarding the Cusabo and their neighbors
comes from the chroniclers of the French Huguenot expeditions to
Carolina and Florida. The first of these left France February 18,
1562, under Jean Ribault, and after a voyage of two months made
land at about 30° N. lat., in what is now the State of Florida. The
explorers then turned north and after having some intercourse with
the Indians at the mouth of the present St. Johns River, which they
named the River May from the month in which it had been discovered,
resumed their voyage northward along the coast. They observed
the mouths of eight rivers, which they named in succession the Seine,
Somme, Loire, Charente, Garonne, Gironde, Belle, and Grande, and

1 An estado is 1.85 yards. 3 Oviedo, Hist. Gen., M1, pp. 630-631.
2 In this case ‘‘ principal”? means great or large. 4 Ibid., p. 631.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 49

finally they entered the mouth of a broad river which ‘‘by reason of
its beauty and grandeur’’ they called Port Royal. This was the
inlet in South Carolina which still bears the name of Port Royal
Sound, and here, before he returned to France, Ribault left a colony
of 28 men, constructing for them a small fort near the modern Port
Royal, South Carolina. Ribault himself then continued northeast
along the coast for a short distance, but becoming alarmed at the
numerous bars and shallows which he encountered and believing
he had accomplished sufficient for one voyage, he returned to France.
Meanwhile the settlers whom he had left finished their fort and then
set out to explore the country. Very fortunately they placed them-
selves on the best of terms with their Indian neighbors, from whom
they obtained provisions sufficient for their sustenance, giving the
Indians in exchange articles of iron and other sorts of merchandise.
The building in which most of their provisions were kept was, how-
ever, destroyed by fire, troubles broke out among them, and finally
the survivors built a small vessel and left the country. On the
voyage they ran short of provisions and some of them starved to
death, but the survivors were at length rescued by an English vessel,
and part of them ultimately reached France. \

From the story of these sur vayare recorded by Laudonniére' and
the data on Le Moyne’s map? we are enabled to get an inter-
esting glimpse of the number, names, and disposition of the tribes
of this section in the year 1562, as also some important information
regarding their ceremonies. From these sources it appears that on
the west side of Broad River, opposite Port Royal Island, were
four small tribes. The first encountered in going up is called by
the French Audusta* or Adusta‘, the second Touppa*® or Toupa.*‘
Beyond this Le Moyne places Mayon,‘ omitting Hoya,’ the fourth,
from his map entirely. From the order in which Laudonniére
enumerates the tribes, however, it would seem probable that Hoya
lay between Touppa and Mayon; at any rate it was in the immediate
neighborhood. Farther toward the north, apparently on the chan-
nel between Port Royal Island and the mainland, was Stalame.‘
These five, according to the chief, Audusta, were in alliance, or
rather on terms of friendship, with each other.’ Farther along in
the narrative we learn of a chief called Maccou living on the channels
southwest of Port Royal Sound.* It should be noted that, following
the feudal custom then prevalent in Europe, the chiefs in this narra-
tive are given the names of their tribes. Yet more toward the
south, beyond Maccou, lived two chiefs, said to be brothers. The

1 Hist. Not. de la Floride, pp. 15-59. 4 Le Moyne, op. cit.
3 Narr. of Le Moyne, map. 6 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 41.
3 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 42. 6 Ibid., p. 47,

148061 ° —22——_-4

50 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

nearer was named Ouadé, the more distant Couexis (Covexis).!
According to the narrative of Laudonniére they found Ouadé on the
river they had named “ Belle,’’ and, since messengers sent by Ouadé
to Couexis for a quantity of provisions, returned with it very early
the next day, it is evident that Couexis was only a short distance
beyond.?, From what has already been said and from other parts
of Laudonniére’s narrative it is evident that all these tribes except
the two last mentioned were close friends, and we may suspect that
they were related. Ouadé and Couexis, though not hostile to the
others, seem to have stood apart from them, but there is no internal
evidence that the languages of any of them differed in the slightest
degree. Of the first group there seems little doubt that Audusta or
Adusta was the tribe afterwards known as Edisto, although they
were some distance from the river which now bears their name, the
shores of which were apparently occupied by them at a later period.

The name Hoya does not occur in Carolina documents, but it is
given by Ibarra, Vandera, and the missionary Juan Rogel in the
forms Oya, Hoya, or Ahoya.* Vandera mentions another place
near Ahoya called Ahoyabe, “a little town subject to Ahoya.’’®
Maccou is the tribe which appears in these Spanish accounts as
Escamacu or Uscamacu, ‘‘an island surrounded by rivers.’”’"* Touppa
and Mayon can not be found in Spanish narratives, nor are we able
to identify them with any names in the documents of South Caro-
lina. Even in Laudonniére’s history they seem to occupy a sub-
ordinate position, and it is probable that in Pardo’s time they had
become united with the Orista, Escamacu, or Hoya. Very likely
one of them is the Ahoyabe above noted. The failure of the Span-
iards to mention Stalame may have a different meaning. This
tribe lay somewhat apart from the others; away from the trail
followed by Pardo in his various expeditions into the interior. Since
we find in later times that the Audusta or Orista had affixed their
name to Edisto River farther east it is possible that the Stalame had
then moved still farther east, and I venture a guess, followig a con-
jecture of Mooney, that they are the Stono of later colonial history.
Of the two tribes lymg southward a complete continuity of infor-
mation shows that Ouadé was the Guale of the Spaniards and the
Wallie of the English, and therefore that their home was near and
gave its name to St. Catherines Island on the Georgia coast. Couexis
would then apply to one of the Guale tribes or towns unless we are
to discern in it an ancient form of the name Coosa.

1 Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, p. 47.

2 Thid., pp. 48, 51-52.

3 See p. 18.

4 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 188; Ruidiaz, La Florida, 11, pp. 304, 481.

5 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, p. 481.

6 Ibid., pp.304, 481. Also spelled Escamaqu, Eescamaqu, Escamaquu, Escamatu, Camacu, and Camaqu
(see p. 21).

fad

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS ok

This identification of Ouadé is important because it enables us to
fix with something approaching certainty the location of the rivers
and islands named by Ribault. Researches among documents from
Spanish sources have enabled the writer to determine with even
greater accuracy the equivalent names applied by the Spaniards,
and as this information will be of some value both to future ethnolo-
gists and future historians, as well as of immediate utility in the
present bulletin, it is mcorporated in the subjomed table. The
names in this table run from south to north, beginning with the coast
north of St. Augustine, Fla. The French ‘‘rivers’”’ are practically
identical with the bays, sounds, and entrances of Spanish, English,
and American writers, although, indeed, one or more rivers falls into

each of these.

GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES FROM St. AUGUSTINE TO CAPE FEAR

FRENCH.

R. de Sarauahi (or Serranay),
called R. Halimacani and (mis-
takenly?) R. Somme in the
Gourgues narrative.

Tle de May.

Riviére Seine.

Le de la Seine.

Riviére Somme (called Aine by
Le Moyne).

Tle de la Somme.

Riviére Loire.

lle de la Loire.
Riviére Charente.
Le de la Charente.
Riviére Garonne.
Ile de la Garonne.
Riviére Gironde.
Tle de la Gironde.
Riviére Belle.

Ile de la Riviére Belle.
Riviére Grande.
Tle dela Riviére Grande.

(See Ile de la Riviére Grande
above.)

Riviére de Port Royal.

lle de Port Royal.

Riviére de Belle Voir (?).

Ile de Belle Voir (?).

Cap Roman.

SPANISH.

Isla de Santa Cruz.

Rio de San Mateo.

Isla de San Juan.

Bahia de Sant Maria (or B. de
Sarauahi).

Isla de Santa Maria.

Bahia de San Pedro (or Tacata-
curu).

Isla de San Pedro (or Tacatacuru).

Bahia de Ballenas (“Bay of
whales’’).

Isla de Gualequini (or Obalda-
quini).

Bahia de Gualequini.

Isla de Asao (or Talaxe).

Bahia de Asao (or Talaxe).

Bahia de Espogue.

Isla de Sapala.

Bahia de Sapala.

Isla de Santa Catarina (or Guale).

Bahia de Santa Catarina (or Cofo-
nufo).

Isla de Asopo.

Bahia de Asopo.

Bahia de la Cruz (or de las Cruces).

Rio Dulee.

Bahia de los Baxos (‘Bay of
shoals’’).

Isla de los Osos (‘‘Island of bears’’).

Bahia de Santa Elena.

Isla de Santa Elena.

Bahia de Orista.

Bahia de Ostano.

Bahia de Cayagua.

Rio Jordan.

Rio de San Lorenzo (also Rio de
Chico, perhaps also Rio de San
Juan Bautista).!

Cabo Romano.

ENGLISH.

Coast land north of St. Augustine.
River St. Johns.

Talbot Island.

Nassau Sound,

Amelia Island.
St. Marys River.

Cumberland Island.
St. Andrews Sound.

Jekyl Island.

St. Simon Sound.

St. Simon Island. ’
Altamaha Sound.
Wolf Island.

Doboy Sound.

Sapelo Island.

Sapelo River.

St. Catherines Island.
St. Catherines Sound,

Ossabaw Island.

Ossabaw Sound.

Great Wassaw Island (or Hilton
Head Island).

Wassaw Sound.

Savannah River.

Tybee Roads.

Hilton Head Island.

Port Royal Sound.

St. Helena Island.

St. Helena Sound.

Edisto Island.

North Edisto River.

Charleston Harbor.

Santee River.

Winyaw Bay (and Pedee River).

Cape Fear.

1 See pp. 35-36,

52 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The French names of the coast islands are for the most part
inferred from a statement by Ribault to the effect that the island
(or the land assumed by him to be an island) was given the same
name as the river immediately south of it.'. Not having access to
his chart, I have been unable to check up the identification of these
islands. In his narrative, or the translations of it available, the
Garonne is omitted from the list of rivers,’ but I am inclined to
believe this is accidental. Le Moyne makes another innovation by
substitutimg the name Aine [Aisne] for Somme.? The writer would
have attributed this to a mere blunder were it not that in the narra-
tive of the Gourgues expedition the name Somme is applied to a
stream between the ‘‘Seine”’ (St. Marys) and the ‘‘May” (St. Johns),
probably the Sarauahi of other French writers, the present Nassau.’
Therefore it is possible that some change in nomenclature was made
by certain of the French explorers.

Just north of the River Grande Ribault and his companions encoun-
tered bad weather which made it necessary for them to put out to sea.
When they cameshoreward again the vessel in which Laudonniére sailed
discovered another river, which they named Belle & Veoir, or Belle
Voir. Le Moyne gives this as a river encountered south of Port
Royal, but his text is based on Laudonniére and on a misunder-
standing of that, so that it may be discarded as authority. For
instance, where Laudonniére says that from the River Grande they
explored northward toward the River Jordan, Le Moyne has it that
they reached that river, and he places it between the Grande and
“Belle Voir.” * On his map, however, the Belle Voir does not appear,
the Grande being next to Port Royal, and the Jordan is correctly
located north of the latter place. The fact of the matter appears to be
this. After leaving Ossabaw Sound and having been forced to sea by
stormy weather, Ribault’s vessel passed northward of Broad River,
discovered one of the rivers flowing into St. Helena Sound and
named it Belle Voir. But in the meantime one of his other ships had
gotten into Broad River, and when it rejoined the rest informed
Ribault of the great advantages of that inlet, with the result that they
turned back and made their settlement there. Therefore in Ribault’s
narrative the River Belle Voir is placed north of Port Royal. Later,
when the colonists sent men to Ouadé asking for food, they came
upon a river of fresh water 10 leagues from their fort. This is the

1 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, 2d ser., m, p. 183.

2 Le Moyne, Narr., descr. of illus., p. 2.

3 Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, p. 211; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, 2d ser., 1, pp. 350-351;
Thid., 1875, 2d ser., 1, p. 279. The Gourgues narratives give the native name of this stream as Halimacani,
after a Timucua chief whose town was near the mouth of the St. Johns on the north side, while St. George
Inlet, or a stream flowing into it, is called Sarabay, the Sarrauahi of earlier French writers. As indicated
above, I believe the last-mentioned name was originally applied to Nassau Inlet.

4 Narr. of Le Moyne, desc, of illus., p. 2.

6
SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 53

River Dulce of Le Moyne—on his map erroneously inserted between
the Rivers Grande and Belle—and in all probability is identical
with Savannah River.

The only remaining tribal name mentioned by Laudonniére is
Chiquola,' but the circumstances under which it was obtained render
its ethnographical value very slight. Being familiar with some of
the narratives of the Ayllon expedition in which Chicora is given con-
siderable prominence, Laudonniére inquired of the Indians whom
he met regarding it. He was entirely unacquainted with their
language but understood that they were trying to tell him that Chi-
quola was the greatest lord of all that country, that he surpassed
themselves in height by a foot and a half, and that he lived to the
north in a large palisaded town. Later he tells us that the fact of
the existence of such a chief and his great power were confirmed by
those who were left to form a settlement. If there is any truth in
this story and the Indians were not simply telling what they thought
the explorers would like to hear, the great town was probably that of
the Kasihta.’

In 1564 a Spanish vessel was sent from Habana to find the French
and root them out, and the narrative of this expedition states
that there were said to be 17 towns around the Bay of Santa Elena. A
town called Usta is mentioned, evidently identical with Audusta, and
another town, not elsewhere recorded, called Yanahume.? In the
former was a Frenchman who had remained in the country rather
than take chances in the small vessel in which his companions had
ventured forth.

The same year Laudonniére again sailed for America, but this time
the Frenchmen decided to settle upon St. Johns River, Florida, and
they did not return to Port Royal. The year following their new
settlement was destroyed by the Spaniards under Menéndez, and
French attempts to colonize the Carolinas and Florida came to an end.

In a letter written shortly after his conquest, Menéndez states that
he had heard that the elder brother of Ribault with the survivors
from the French garrison “had gone 25 leagues away, toward the
north, to a very good port called Guale, because the Indians of that
place were his friends, and that there were within 3 or 4 leagues
40 villages of Indians belonging to two brothers, one of whom was:
named Cansim and the other Guale.’’* In Cansin and Guale we of
course recognize, in spite of changes and corruptions in orthography,
Couexis and Ouadé. In the spring of 1566 Menéndez sailed north-
ward himself and reached Guale, where he was informed by a French
refugee that Guale and Orista were at war with each other and that

‘ Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, pp. 29-31. 3 Lowery, MSS. in Lib. Cong.
*See p. 219. 4 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, p. 145.

54 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the people of Guale had captured two men belonging to those of
Orista. Menéndez prevailed upon the Guale chief to make peace
with his northern neighbor, who is said to have been the more power-
ful of the two—the advantage which had been gained over him having
been due to the French refugees at Guale. Then, taking the two
Orista captives with him, and leaving two Spaniards as hostages,
Menéndez kept on toward the north and finally entered Broad
River. There he found that the town of Orista, which is of course
identical with the French Audusta, had been burned and the inhabit-
ants were starting to rebuild it. The Indians met him at first in no
friendly spirit, but through the mediation of his two captives he soon
placed himself upon good terms with them, and they sent to all the
surrounding villages to summon the chiefs and people to come to see
him. ‘They lighted great fires, brought many shellfish, and a great
multitude of Indians came that night, and three chiefs who were
subject to Orista; they counselled him that he should go to another
village a league from Orista, where many other chiefs would come to
see him.” The next day Orista himself and two more chiefs came,
along with other Indians. ‘‘Many Indians came laden with corn,
cooked and roasted fish, oysters, and many acorns,” and the Spanish
leader on his side brought out biscuits, wine, and honey. After the
feast ‘‘they placed the Adelantado in the seat of the chief, and Orista
approached him with various ceremonies, and took his hands; after-
wards the other chiefs and Indians did the same thing—the mother
and relatives of the two slaves whom they had brought from Guale
wept for joy. Afterwards they began to sing and dance, the chiefs
and some of the principal Indians remaining with the Adelantado;
and the celebration and rejoicing lasted until midnight, when they
retired.’’ Later the Spaniards returned to the village of Orista
itself, where they were again hospitably entertained. “In the morn-
ing the chief took the Adelantado to a very large house, and placed
him in his seat, gomg over with him the same ceremony that had
been performed in the first village.’”’ The Spaniards were presented
with well-tanned deerskins and some pearls, although these were of
little value, because they had been burned. At Menéndez’s request
the chief showed him a site suitable for a fort, which was begun forth-
with and received the name of San Felipe. On his way back Menén-
dez was able to make such an impression on the Indians of Guale,
who believed that the cross he had set up in their town had been
instrumental in breaking a long drought, that they desired to have
Christians left with them and inside of the islands along the Georgia
coast many Indians came down to the shore to beg for crosses.
Barcia states that a bolt of lightning having fallen on a tree near the
cross which had been set up at Guale ‘‘ the Indians, men and women,
all ran to the place and picked up the splinters in order to keep

SWANTON J EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS aD

them in their houses as relics.’”’' The island of Guale, as already
stated, was St. Catherines Island. It is described in the narrative
which we have just quoted as ‘‘about 4 or 5 leagues in diameter.”’
In August Menéndez again visited Fort San Felipe and Guale, but his
stay was short. Finding the garrison at the former place in serious
straits for food, he directed Juan Pardo to take 150 soldiers inland
‘and quarter them at intervals upon the natives. While there are
several accounts of this and subsequent expeditions undertaken by
Pardo into the interior, the only one that concerns us here is a Rela-
tion by Juan de la Vandera, in command of the post at San Felipe,
which sets forth ‘‘the places and what sort of land is to be found at
each place among the provinces of Florida, through which Captain
Juan Pardo, at the command of Pero Menéndez de Avilés, entered
to discover a road to New Spain, from the point of Santa Elena of the
said provinces, during the years 1566 and 1567.’ The first part of
this is of considerable importance for our study of the Cusabo tribe.
It runs as follows:

He started from Santa Elena with his company in obedience to orders received
and on that day they went to sleep at a place called Uscamacu, which is an island
surrounded by rivers. Its soil is sandy and makes very good clay for pottery, tiles,
and other necessary things of the kind; there is good ground here for planting maize
and grapevines, of which there is an abundance.

From Uscamacu he went straight to another place called Ahoya, where they stopped
and spent the night. This Ahoya is an island; some parts of it are surrounded by
rivers, others look like mainland. It is good or at least reasonably good soil where
maize grows and also big vine stocks with runners.

From Ahoya he went to Ahoyabe, a small village, subject to Ahoya and in about
the same kind of country.

From Ahoyabe he went to another place, which is calléd Cozao, which belongs to a
rather great cacique and has a lot of good land like the others, and many strips of
stony ground, and where maize, wheat, oats, grapevines, all kinds of fruit and vege-
tables, can be grown, because it has rivers and brooks of sweet water and reason-
ably good soil for all.

From Cozao he went to another small place which belongs to a chieftain (cacique)
of the same Cozao; the land of this place is good, but there is little of it.

From here he went to Enfrenado,’ which is a miserable place, although it has many
corners of rich soil like the others.

From Enfrenado he went to Guiomaez from where to the cape of Santa Elena there
are forty leagues. The road by which he went is somewhat difficult, but the land or
soil is good and everything that is grown in Cozao can be cultivated here and even more
and better; there are great swamps, which are deep, caused by the great flatness of
the country.*

Uscamacu, where Pardo spent the first night, is certainly identical
with the Maccou of the French, and would thus be somewhere to
the southwest of Broad River. Pardo and his company were prob-
ably set across to the neighborhood of this place in boats from Fort

! Barcia, La Florida, pp. 104-110.

2 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, pp. 451-486.

3 This word would mean ‘‘bridled” in Spanish. It may be a native term but does not look like one.
4 Translation by Mrs. F. Bandelier.

56 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [RULL. 73

San Felipe, unless the site ordinarily assigned to the fort is errone-
ous.'. From Uscamacu they marched northwest along Broad River
and then up the Coosawhatchie. The first stopping place after
leaving Uscamacu was Ahoya, the Hoya of the French, one of those
tribes or villages allied with Audusta. Ahoyabe would probably
be an out settlement from Ahoya and hence belong to the same
group. In the name of the next place, Cozao, we have the second
historical mention ? of the Coosa tribe of South Carolina, which occu-
pied the upper reaches of the Coosawhatchie, Combahee, Ashepoo,
Edisto, and Ashley Rivers, the first notice having been in the list
of provinces given by Francisco of Chicora. The greater power
ascribed to this chief agrees with our later information regarding
the prominence of his people. From the narrative it is evident
that the next place where the Spaniards stopped was also a Coosa
village. The last two places may have been Coosa towns also, but
there is no means of knowing. It has been suggested that Guiomaez
was perhaps the later Wimbee, but, if so, the tribe must have moved
nearer the coast before the period of English colonization, when
they were between Combahee and Broad Rivers. The next place,
Canos, 10 leagues from Guiomaez, was identical with the Cofitachequi
of De Soto and probably with the later Kasihta town among the
Creeks.®

Barcia mentions as one result of the Florida settlements the dis-
covery of an herb of wonderful medicinal qualities, which was in all
probability the nut grass (Cyperus rotundus). He says:

The Spaniards discovered in this land some long roots, marked like strings of beads,
so that each portion cut off remains rounded; outside they are black and within
white and dry, hard like bones; the bark is so hard that one can scarcely remove it.
The taste is aromatic, so that it appears to be a specific; the galanga is like it. The
plant which produces it throws out short shoots, and spreads its branches along the
ground; its leaves are very broad, and very green; it is warm (or heated) at the limit
of the second degree, dries at the beginning of the first; it grows in moist situations:
The Indians use the plant, crushed between two stones, to rub over their entire bodies,
when they bathe themselves, because they say that it tightens and strengthens the
flesh, with the good odor, which it has, and that they feel much improved on account
of it. They also use it in the form of a powder, for pains in the stomach.

The Spaniards learned of this from the Indians, and they used it for the same pur-
poses, and afterwards they discovered that it was an admirable specific for colic (or
pain in the side), and urinary trouble, since it causes the stones to be driven out,
even though they are very large. Other virtues were discovered, its estimation
growing so much among the soldiers, that they all carried rosaries of these beads,
which they called ‘‘of Santa Elena” on account of the great abundance of these

which there are in the marshy places at the Cape of Santa Elena and province of Orista
and the neighboring parts.*

1 Lowery, Span. Settl., 0, pp. 438-440.

°If Couexis be excepted.

®See pp. 216-218.

‘Barcia, La Florida, p. 133. See Lowery, Span. Settl., 1, p. 381.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS |

In 1569 the Jesuit missionary Juan Rogel arrived at Santa Elena,
and at the same time Antonio Sedefio and Father Baez proceeded
to Guale. In a letter written by Rogel to Menéndez, December 9,
1570, he relates the fortunes, or rather misfortunes, of his work
among the people of the province of Orista.

In the beginning of my relations with those Indians [he says], they grew very
much in my eyes, for seeing them in their customs and order of life far superior
to those of Carlos, I lauded God, seeing each Indian married to only one woman,
take care of and cultivate his land, maintain his house and educate his children
with great care, seeing that they were not contaminated by the most abominable
of sins, not incestuous, not cruel, nor thieves, seeing them speak the truth with
each other, and enjoy much peace and righteousness. Thus it seemed to me we
were quite sure of them and that probably I would take a longer time in learning
their language in order to explain to them the mysteries of our Holy Faith than
they would need to accept them and become Christians. Therefore I myself and
three more of the fathers of our company studied with great diligence and haste to
learn it and within six months I spoke to them and preached in their tongue.

But after two and a half months the time for gathering acorns ar-
rived, and all left him and ‘‘scattered through those forests, each one
to his own place, and came together only at certain feasts, which
they held every two months, and this was not always in one _ place,
but at one time here and at another in another place, etc.’’ In fact
they lived scattered in this manner for nine months out of the year.

And there are two reasons for this [he says]: First because they have been accus-
tomed to live in this manner for many thousands of years, and to try to get them away
from it looks to them equal to death; the second, that even if they wished to live thus
the land itself does not allow it—for being so very poor and miserable and its strength
very soon sapped out—and therefore they themselves state that this is the reason why
they are living so disseminated and changing their abode so often.

Rogel endeavored to continue his work, attending the infrequent
gatherings mentioned above whenever he was able. At one time he
spoke to the greater part of ‘‘the vassals of Orista”? who had come
together at the Rio Dulce, presumably the Savannah, and in the
spring he proposed that they plant enough ground so that they could
remain in one place, where he could approach them more easily.
This was done, but all except two families soon left, and later Vandera,
commander of the fort of San Felipe, was compelled to exact several
canoe loads of corn from the Indians and to quarter some of his
troops among them. This, as Rogel anticipated and as the event
proved, incensed the Indians so much that further missionary efforts
on his part were out of the question, and on July 13, 1570, he left
them to return to San Felipe, which he soon afterwards abandoned
for Habana. One main cause of Rogel’s failure to impress these
people was evidently a misapprehension on his part, for he says that
when he began to preach against the devil they were highly offended,
declaring that he was good, and afterwards they all left him. Pre-

58 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

sumably they understood that an attack had been made on one of
their own deities, and very likely Rogel was perfectly willing on his
side to identify the prince of evil with any or all of them. Among
the chiefs upon whom Vandera levied the above-mentioned tribute of
corn Rogel mentions Escamacu, Orista, and Hoya, the first of whom
is of course the Uscamacu of Vandera and Pardo.1

In 1576 the Indian policy which had caused Rogel’s withdrawal
brought on a rebellion. Most narratives attribute this to an attempt
to levy a contribution of provisions on Indians near Fort San Felipe,
but from one very trustworthy document it appears that it was at
least brought to a head by the arbitrary conduct of a Capt. Solis, left
temporarily in charge of the above-mentioned post by Hernando de
Miranda. This man killed two Indians, seemingly without suffi-
cient cause, one a chief named Hemalo, who had been in Madrid. In
July of that year, the garrison of Fort San Felipe being short of pro-
visions, and the Indians having refused to give them any, the Alférez
Moyano was sent at the head of 22 men to take some by force. The
Indians, however, persuaded Moyano to have his men extinguish the
matches with which their guns were fired, on the ground that their
women and children were afraid they were going to be killed, and as
soon as they had done so the Indians fell upon them and killed all .
except a soldier named Andrés Calderén. This took place July 22.
Testimony taken in St. Augustine in 1600 gives the name of the tribe
concerned as Camacu (i. e., Escamacu)? but contemporary letters,
which are probably correct, call it ““Oristau”’ or ‘Oristan.”” Calde-
ron reached the fort in three days and gave the alarm. Meanwhile
“the Provinces of Guale, Uscamacu, and Oristau’’ had risen in
revolt. News reached Hernando de Miranda and he returned at
once to Santa Elena. Capt. Solis was then dispatched against the
Indians, but he was ambushed and killed along with eight soldiers.
The Indians to the number, according to one Spanish narrative, of
2,000 then besieged the fort, and they killed several Spaniards besides,
including an interpreter named Aguilar. One account says that
32 men were slain, but it does not appear whether this included
Moyano’s force or not. Among those lost were the factor, auditor
(contador), and treasurer. Finally the Spaniards were withdrawn
to St. Augustine and the Indians entered the fort and burned it. It
was restored shortly under the name of Fort San Marcos, and in 1579
Governor Pedro Menéndez Marqués visited the place to pay the
troops and incidentally to take revenge on the neighboring hostiles.
He attacked a fortified town named Co¢gapoy, 20 leagues from Fort
San Marcos, strongly placed in a swamp and occupied by Indians
said never to have been willing to make peace with the Spaniards.
The town was severely handled, a number of Indians, including a

1 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 1, pp. 301-308. 2 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 147.

SWANTON | EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 59
sister of the chief, his mother, a° son, and the son’s wife, were
captured, and 40 Indians were burned in their houses. Menéndez
liberated most of his male captives and exchanged the women for
some Frenchmen, who were largely blamed for the uprising, and
most of whom were subsequently executed.

In 1580 a new uprising occurred, again attributed to the French.
In fact, shortly before, a French vessel was captured near the
mouth of the St. Johns and two others belonging to the same fleet were
known to have entered the bay of Gualequini and to have opened com-
munication with the natives. Indian witnesses also testified that they
had been promised assistance from a new French armada shortly to
appear. Fort San Marcos was evidently abandoned, or captured by
the Indians, at this time and was not reestablished until late in 1582
or early in 1583. A letter dated July 19, 1582, says that the Indians
of the Province of Santa Elena had rebelled and ‘‘there was no rem-
edy for it.”’ In 1583, however, Governor Menéndez writes that all
of the Indians—both inland and on the coast—had come to see him
and to yield obedience and that the chief of Santa Elena ‘‘has done
a great deal, as he was the first to embrace the faith.’’ Fort San
Marcos may have received still another name, for a document of the
period refers to it as ‘‘Fort Catuco.”’ In 1586 Gutiérrez de Miranda,
who was prominent in a war against the Potano Indians of Florida,
was in command of the Santa Elena fort. Late in 1587, however, or
very early in 1588, it was finally abandoned and the garrison with-
drawn.'

In a letter written to the king, February 23, 1598, Gongalo Mendez
de Can¢co, Governor of Florida, states that the chief of Kiawa had
accompanied the chief of Escamacu to war against the Indians of
Guale and they had taken seven scalps.? In another, written the
day following, he mentions, among the chiefs who had come to St.
Augustine “to give their submission”’ to him, ‘‘the chief of Aluste”’
and ‘“‘the chief of Aobi.”’*? I have not found a later mention of
Aobi, but the name Aluste occurs several times in Spanish docu-
ments, spelled Alieste, Alueste, and Aluete. That it was to the
north is shown by a statement to the effect that in the massacre of
monks, which had taken place the preceding year, all of those between
Aluste and Asao had been killed.t| More specific information is
contained in the relation of a visit which Governor Pedro de Ibarra
made to the Indians along the Georgia coast in November and Decem-
ber, 1604. The northernmost point reached by him was Guale (St.
Catherines Island), where, besides calling together the Guale chiefs,

! The information contained in this paragraph, except as otherwise noted, is principally from the Lowery,
Brooks, and Wright manuscripts in the Library of Congress.
2 Lowery and Brooks, MSS., Lib. Cong.

‘Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 135.
4 Ibid., p. 186.

60 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

“he commanded that within ‘two days should assemble all the micos
of Oya and Alueste and other chiefs from the country around.”’!
In Oya we recognize the Cusabo town already mentioned, and we
learn just below that Alueste was in the same province; for, when
Ibarra inquired of the assembled chiefs if any of them had any
complaints to make, “the chief of Aluete said that the chief of
Talapo and the chief of Ufalague and the chief of Orista, his nephew
and heirs, were his vassals and had risen and gone to live with the
mico of Asao.’’?

When Ibarra returned to Asao he interviewed these chiefs, and
he states that they admitted the truth of what Alueste had said,
adding that they had done so ‘‘because he was a bad Indian and
had a bad heart, and he gave them many bad words, and for that
reason they had withdrawn and were obeying the chief of Orista,
who was the heir of the said Alueste, and was a good Indian and
treated them well, and gave them good words.’ The governor,
however, exacted a promise from them that they would “return to
their obedience,”’ to which they agreed. It is sufficiently evident
from this that all of the tribes mentioned were Cusabo, whether
Alueste and Orista are or are not variants of the later Edisto. Re-
sponsibility for the murder of the missionaries in 1597 was laid by
one of the captured Indians on the Indians of Cosahue (Cosapue),
the Salchiches (an unidentified tribe living inland), the Indians of
Tulufina (a Guale town), and those of Santa Elena. The chiefs of
Ufalague and Sufalete are said to have killed Fray Pedro de Corpa,
and the Ufalague and Alueste assisted in disposing of Fray Blas, but,
on the other hand, the chief of Talapo saved the life of Fray Davila,
the only missionary to escape. At a later date, by a comfortable
volte-face not unusual with Indians, those of Cosapue and Ufalague,
together with those of Talapo, helped punish the murderers.*

From about the time of this massacre we begin to find the name
Escamacu used for the Indians of Santa Elena in preference to
Orista. In the report of his expedition of 1605, Ecija speaks of the
chief of Escamacu as ‘‘the principal of that land”’ (i. e., the land of
Santa Elena), and he places “the bar of Orista” 6 leagues north of
that of Santa Elena, where is the River Edisto. Nevertheless the
name had become fixed upon it at a much earlier period for in a
letter of Bartélome de Arguelles, of date 1586, the bay of Orista is
said to be beyond that of Santa Elena to the north, 5 leagues.* It
is evident, therefore, that whatever temporary changes had taken
place in the residence of portions of the Edisto tribe, changes such
as are indicated in Ibarra’s letter, a part of them, probably the main

1 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 186. 3 Ibid., p. 191.
2Ibid., pp. 188-189. 4 Lowery and Brooks, MSS., Lib. Cong.

' swanTon] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 61

body, had become settled upon the stream which still bears their
name by the date last given.

The first clear notice of the Stono seems to be in the narrative of
Ecija’s second voyage, 1609. When he was in the port of Cayagua
(Charleston Harbor) on his return he encountered a canoe, in which
were the chiefs of Cayagua, Escamacu, and “Ostano.” In the pilot’s
description at the end of this narrative we read, ‘From the bar of
Orista to that of Ostano are 4 leagues.’”’ The opening was narrow
and the distance to the bar of Cayagua 8 leagues.1_ From the figures
it seems clear that this was not the present Stono Inlet, but North
Edisto River. The possibility that this tribe was the Stalame of
Laudonniére and that it moved eastward in later times has already
been indicated.

A letter written June 17, 1617, by the Florida friars, complaining
of conditions, mentions Santa Elena among those provinces where
there were then no missions.'. In another from the governor of
Florida, dated November 15, 1633, we learn that the chief of Satua-
che, ‘‘more than 70 leagues” from St. Augustine, had brought to the
capital three Englishmen who had been shipwrecked on his coast.
This place lay from 6 to 10 leagues north of Santa Elena and seems
from the context to have been newly missionized.? The position
given would place it near the mouth of Edisto River. From a letter
written in 1647 it appears that the Indians of “Satoache”’ had
entirely abandoned their town,! yet they are mentioned, under the
name Chatuache, in a list of missions dated 1655, in which San
Felipe also appears. However, the fort seems never to have been
rebuilt, and the missions were nothing more than outstations served
at long intervals.

In 1670, when the English colony of South Carolina was estab-
lished, there was no Spanish post east of the Savannah and no mission
station nearer than St. Catherines Island, although traces of former
Spanish occupancy were evident at Port Royal (Santa Elena). The
Edisto were still on Edisto River and the Stono near the place occu-
pied by them at the beginning of the century. The term “Indians
of St. Helens” probably includes the Escamacu and related tribes.
The Coosa were on the upper courses of the Cusabo rivers, where
they seem to have lived throughout the Spanish period. The Kiawa
of Ashley River are of course the ‘“‘Cayagua”’ of the Spaniards, and
are in precisely the same location; the neighboring Wando on Cooper
River and Etiwaw or Itwan on Wando River—particularly about
Daniels Island*—are perhaps referred to in one or two Spanish docu-

1 Lowery and Brooks, MSS., Lib. Cong. 8 P. 322; Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 132.
2 Lowery, MSS., Lib. Cong. 4S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 386.

62 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

ments, but this is doubtful. As already suggested, the Wimbee,
between Broad and Combahee Rivers, may be the Guiomaez or
Guiomae of Pardo. The Combahee and Ashepoo on the rivers
bearing those names, and the Witcheau or Wichcauh, mentioned in a
sale of land, are entirely new to us.

Again we are dependent for specific information regarding these
peoples on the narratives of voyages. The first which yields any-
thing of value is ‘“‘A True Relation of a Voyage upon discovery of
part of the Coast of Florida, from Lat. of 31 Deg. to 33 Deg. 45 m.
North Lat. in the ship Adventure, William Hilton Commander,” etc.!
The Adventure sailed from Spikes Bay, Barbados, August 10, 1663,
and on September 3 entered St. Helena Sound.

On Saturday the fifth of September [runs the narrative], two Indians came on
Board us, and said they were of St. Ellens; being very bold and familiar; speaking
many Spanish words, as Cappitan, Commarado, and Adeus. They know the use of
Guns and are as little startled at the fireing of a Piece of Ordnance, as he that hath
been used to them many years: They told us the nearest Spaniards were at St. Augus-
tins, and several of them had been there, which as they said was but ten days’ journey
and that the Spaniards used to come to them at Saint Hllens sometimes in Conoas
within Land, at other times in Small Vessels by Sea, which the Indians describe to
have but two Masts.

At the invitation of the Indians the longboat with 12 hands was
sent to St. Helena but the actions of the Indians appeared to its
occupants so threatening that they returned without remaining
overnight.

That which we noted there [the narrative says] was a fair house builded in the shape
of a dovehouse, round, two hundred foot at least, compleatly covered with Palmeta-
leaves, the wal-plate being twelve foot high, or thereabouts, within lodging rooms and
forms; two pillars at the entrance of a high Seat above all the rest; Also another house
like a Sentinel-house, floored ten foot high with planks, fastened with Spikes and
Nayls, standing upon Substantial Posts, with several other small houses round about.
Also we saw many planks, to the quantity of three thousand foot or thereabouts, with
other Timber squared, and a Cross before the great house. Likewise we saw the
Ruines of an old Fort, compassing more than half an acre of land within the Trenches,
which we supposed to be Charls’s Fort, built, and so called by the French in 1562, &c.

In the meantime the vessel was visited by the chief of Edisto
from the other side of the sound, who invited Hilton to come to his
town and told him of some English castaways upon that coast, some
of whom were in his custody and some at St. Helena. He informed
them that three had been killed by the Stono. Those English who
were with the Edisto were released, and the explorers then started
to make their way to St. Helena through the inside channels in order
to recover the rest. On the way ‘‘came many canoes about us with
corn, pompions, and venison, deerskins, and a sort of sweet wood.”’
Ultimately after exchanging letters with a Spanish captain who had

1S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, pp. 18-26.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 63

been sent to St. Helena from St. Augustine to recover the English
castaways, Hilton gave up his attempt, and having explored the
entrance to Port Royal and ranged the coast to the northward
almost to Cape Hatteras he got back to Barbados on January 6,
1664. In their general description of the land between Port Royal
and Edisto River the explorers say:

The Indians plant in the worst Land because they cannot cut down the Timber in the
best, and yet have plenty of Corn, Pompions, Water-Mellons, Musk-mellons: although
the Land be over grown with weeds through their lasinesse, yet they have two or three
crops of Corn a year, as the Indians themselves inform us. The Country abounds with
Grapes, large Figs, and Peaches; the Woods with Deer, Conies, Turkeys, Quails,
Curlues, Plovers, Teile, Herons; and as the Indians say, in Winter with Swans, Geese,
Cranes, Duck and Mallard, and innumerable of other water-Fowls, whose names we
know not, which lie in the Rivers, Marshes, and on the Sands: Oysters in abundance,
with great store of Muscles: a sort of fair Crabs, and a round Shel-fish called Horse-feet;
The Rivers stored plentifully with Fish that we saw play and leap. There are great
Marshes, but most as far as we saw little worth, except for a Root that grows in them
the Indians make good Bread of . . . The Natives are very healthful; we saw many
very Aged amongst them.!

The next voyage that concerns us is entitled: ‘‘The Port Royall
Discovery. Being the Relation of a voyage on the Coast of the
Province of Carolina formerly called Florida in the Continent of the
Northerne America from Charles River neere Cape Feare in the County
of Clarendon and the Lat: of 34: deg: to Port Royall in the North
Lat: of 32 d. begun 14th June 1666. Performed by Robert Sand-
ford Esqr Secretary and Cheife Register for the Right Hon?'® the
Lords Proprietors of their County of Clarendon in the Province
aforesaid.”’?

On the date mentioned Sandford sailed with a vessel of ‘‘scarce 17
tons’? and a shallop ‘fof some 3 tons.”’ On the night of the 19th the
larger vessel became separated from the shallop, and on the 22d the
former sighted and entered what is now called North Edisto River.
Sandford explored this for some distance and found many Indian
cornfields and houses scattered among them, besides numerous
heaps of oyster shells. From the Indians he learned that the chief
town of the Edisto tribe was some distance inland, on what is now
Edisto Island, at a place which Langdon Cheves, the editor of
“The Shaftsbury Papers,’”’ suggests was ‘“‘probably near cross roads,
by Eding’s ‘Spanish mount’ place.”’ Having gone beyond the
nearest landing place for this village he stopped there on his return
to accommodate the Indians who were desirous to trade with him.

When we were here [he says] a Cap‘ of the Nation named Shadoo (one of them w*
Hilton had carryed to Barbados) was very earnest with some of our Company to goe
with him and lye a night att their Towne w*" hee told us was but a smale distance

thence I being equally desirous to knowe the forme manner and populousnesse of the
place asalsoe what state the Casique held (fame in all theire things preferring this place

1S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 24. *Tbid., pp. 57-82.

64 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

to all the rest of the Coast, and foure of my Company (vizt.) Lt.: Harvey, Lt: Woory,
Mt Thomas Giles and mt Henry Woodward forwardly offring themselves to the service
haveing alsoe some Indians aboard mee who constantly resided there night & day J
permitted them to goe with Shadoo they retorned to mee the next morning w'" great
Comendacons of their entertainment but especially of the goodness of the land they
marcht through and the delightfull situation of the Towne. Telling mee withall that
the Cassique himselfe appeared not (pretending some indisposition, but that his state
was supplyed by a Female who received them with gladness and Courtesy placeing
my Lt: Harvey on the seat by her their relation gave myselfe a Curiosity (they alsoe
assureing mee that it was not above foure Miles off) to goe and see that Towne and
takeing with mee Capt. George Cary and a file of men I marched thitherward followed
by a long traine of Indians of whome some or other always presented yimselfe to carry
mee on his shoulders over any the branches of Creekes or plashy corners of Marshes in
our Way. This walke though it tend to the Southward of the West and consequently
leads neere alongst the Sea Coast Yett it opened to our Viewe soe excellent a Country
both for Wood land and Meadowes as gave singular satisfaction to all my Company.
We crossed one Meadowe of not lesse than a thousand Acres all firme good land and as
rich a Soyle as any clothed w'" a ffine grasse not passing knee deepe, but very thick
sett & fully adorned with yeallow flowers. A pasture not inferiour to any I have
seene in England the wood land were all of the same sort both for timber and mould
with the best of those wee had ranged otherwhere and w“out alteration or abatement
from their goodnes all the way of our March. Being entered the Towne wee were con-
ducted into a large house of a Circular forme (their generall house of State) right
against the entrance way a high seate of sufficient breadth for half a dozen persons on
which sate the Cassique himselfe (vouchsafeing mee that favour) w'* his wife on his
right hand (shee who had received those whome I had sent the evening before) hee was
an old man of a large stature and bone. Round the house from each side the throne
quite to the Entrance were lower benches filled with the whole rabble of men Women
and children in the center of this house is kept a constant fire mounted on a great heape
of Ashes and surrounded with little lowe foormes Capt: Cary and my selfe were placed
on the higher seate on each side of the Cassique and presented with skinns accompanied
with their Ceremonyes of Welcome and freindshipp (by stroaking our shoulders with
their palmesand sucking in theire breath the whilst) The Towne is scituate on the side
or rather in the skirts of a faire forrest in w°" at severall distances are diverse feilds of
Maiz with many little houses straglingly amongst them for the habitations of the par-
ticular families. On the East side and part of the South It hath a large prospect over
meadows very spatious and delightfull, before the Doore of their Statehouse is a spa-
tious walke rowed w'" trees on both sides tall & full branched, not much unlike to
Elms w°" serves for the Exercise and recreation of the men who by Couples runn after
a marble bowle troled out alternately by themselves with six foote staves in their
hands w°" they tosse after the bowle in their race and according to the laying of their
staves wine or loose the beeds they contend for an Exercise approveable enough in the
winter but some what too violent (mee thought) for that season and noone time of the
day from this walke is another lesse aside from the round house for the children to sport
in. After afewe houres stay I retorned to my Vessell w*” a greate troope of Indians att
my heeles. The old Cassique himselfe in the number, who lay aboard mee that night
without the society of any of his people, some scores of w*" lay in boothes of their own
immediate ereccon on the beach.

After this Sandford passed around through Dawho River and out
by the South Edisto. Soon after he fell in with the shallop from
which he had been separated and then made south to the entrance

of Port Royal, where he anchored in front of the principal Indian
town.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS > 65

I had not ridd long [he says] ere the Cassique himselfe came aboard mee w'" a Canoa
full of Indians presenting mee with skinns and bidding mee welcome after their manner,
I went a shoare with him to see their Towne w™ stood in sight of our Vessell, Found as to
the forme of building in every respect like that of Eddistowe with a plaine place before
the great round house for their bowling recreation att th’end of w* stood a faire wooden
Crosse of the Spaniards ereccon. But I could not observe that the Indians performed any
adoracon beforeitt. Allround the Towne for a great space are severall feilds of Maiz ofa
very large growth The soyle nothing inferior to the best wee had seene att Eddistowe ap-
parently more loose and light and the trees in the woods much larger and rangd att a
greater distance all the ground under them burthened exceedingly and amongst it a
great variety of choice pasturage I sawe here besides the great number of peaches w*"
the more Northerly places doe alsoe abound in some store of figge trees very large and
faire both fruite and plants and diverse grape vines w*" though growing without Cul-
ture in the very throng of weedes and bushes were yett filled with bunches of grapes
to admiracon. . . . The Towne is scited on an Island made by a branch w* cometh
out of Brayne Sound and falleth into Port Royall about a mile above where wee landed
a cituacon not extraordinary here.

Here the shallop rejoined him after sailing through from St. Helena
Sound by the inside channel. Wommony, son of the chief of Port
Royal, and one of those whom Hilton had carried to Barbados, acted
as its guide. Before his departure from this place Sandford left a
surgeon named Henry Woodward to learn the language and in
exchange took an Indian of the town with him. He says:

I called the Cassique & another old man (His second in Authority) and their wives
And in sight and heareing of the whole Towne, delivered Woodward into their charge
telling them that when I retorned I would require him att their hands, They received
him with such high Testimonys of Joy and thankfullnes as hughely confirmed to mee
their great desire of our friendshipp & society, The Cassique placed Woodward by him
uppon the Throne and after lead him forth and shewed him a large feild of Maiz w°"
hee told him should bee his, then hee brought him the Sister of the Indian that I had
with mee telling him that shee should tend him & dresse his victualls and be careful of
him that soe her Brother might be the better used amongst us.

An Indian of Edisto also desired to accompany him, and thinking that soe hee should
be the more acceptable hee caused himselfe to be shoaren on the Crowne after ye
manner of the Port Royall Indians, a fashion w*" I guesse they have taken from the
Spanish Fryers. Thereby to ingratiate themselves w that Nation and indeed all
along I observed a kinde of Emulacon amongst the three principall Indians of this
Country (viz') Those of Keywaha Edistowe and Port Royall concerning us and our
Freindshipp, Each contending to assure it to themselves and jealous of the other
though all be allyed and this Notw' standing that they knewe wee were in actuall
warre with the Natives att Clarendon and had killled and sent away many of them,
ffor they frequently discoursed with us concerning the warre, told us that the Natives
were noughts they land Sandy and barren, their Country sickly, but if wee would
come amongst them Wee should finde the Contrary to all their Evills, and never any
occasion of dischargeing our Gunns but in merryment and for pastime.

Sandford now returned toward the north and, having failed to
make Kiawa (Charleston Harbor), landed at Charles Town on the
Cape Fear River, July 12, 1666.

The expedition that was to result in the permanent settlement of the
colony of South Carolina made a landfall at Sewee (now Bull’s) Bay

148061°—22_5

66 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

on the 15th or 16th of March, 1670, and anchored at the south end of
Oni-see-cau (now Bull’s) Island. The longboat was sent ashore.

Vpon its approach to ye Land few were ye natiues who vpon ye Strand made fires
& came towards vs whooping in theire own tone & manner making signes also where
we should best Land & when we came a shoare they stroked vs on ye shoulders with
their hands saying Bony Conraro Angles. knowing us to be English by our Collours (as
wee supposed) we then gave them Brass rings & tobacco at which they seemed well
pleased, & into ye boats after halfe an howre spent with ye Indians we betooke our
selues, they liked our Company soe well that they would haue come a board with us.
we found a pretty handsome channell about 3 fathoms & a halfe from ye place we
Landed to ye Shippe, through which the next day we brought ye shipp to Anchor
feareing a contrary winde & to gett in for some fresh watter. A day or two after ye
Gouerno™ whom we tooke in at Bermuda with seuerall others went a shoare to view ye
Land here. Some 3 Leagues distant from the shipp, carrying along with us one of ye
Eldest Indians who accosted us ye other day, & as we drew to ye shore A good number
of Indians appeared clad with deare skins hauing with them their bows & Arrows, but
our Indian calling out Appada they withdrew & lodged theire bows & returning ran
up to ye middle in mire & watter to carry us a shoare where when we came they gaue
us ye stroaking Complimt of ye country and brought deare skins some raw some drest
to trade with us for which we gaue them kniues beads & tobacco and glad they were
of ye Market. by & by came theire women clad in their Mosse roabs bringing their
potts to boyle a kinde of thickening which they pound & make food of, & as they
order it being dryed makes a pretty sort of bread, they brought also plenty of Hickery
nutts, a wall nut in shape, & taste onely differing in ye thicknees of the shell & small-
ness of ye kernell. the Gouerno™ & seu’all others walking a little distance from ye
water side came to ye Hutt Pallace of his Maty of ye place, who meeteing vs tooke ye
Gouernot on his shoulders & carryed him into ye house in token of his chearfull Enter-
tainement. here we had nutts & root cakes such as their women useily make as before
& watter to drink for they use no other lickquor as I can Learne in this Countrey,
while we were here his Ma's three daughters entred the Pallace all in new roabs of
new mosse which they are neuer beholding to ye Taylor to trim up, with plenty of
beads of diuers Collours about their necks: I could not imagine that ye sauages would
so well deport themselues who coming in according to their age & all to sallute the
strangers, stroaking of them. these Indians understanding our business to S* Hellena
told us that ye Westoes a rangeing sort of people reputed to be the Man eaters had
ruinated y* place killed seu’all of those Indians destroyed & burnt their Habitations
& that they had come as far as Kayawah doeing the like there, ye Casseeka of which
place was within one sleep of us (which is 24 howrs for they reckon after that rate)
with most of his people whome in two days after came aboard of us.'

These people were probably of Siouan stock, but they bordered
directly upon the Cusabo tribes and this account of them will give
us a slight opportunity to compare the two peoples. This and the
short notice that appears in Lawson embrace practically all of the
information we have regarding the Sewee Indians, if such indeed
they were.

Taking the chief of Kayawah, ‘‘a uery Ingenious Indian & a great
Linguist in this Maine,” with them the prospective settlers now
sailed to Port Royal, where they anchored, but it was two days
before they could speak with an Indian, when what had been told

1S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls. v, pp. 165-166.

oS Se >

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 67

them at Sewee regarding the irruption of the Westo was con-
firmed. Weighing anchor from Port Royal River they then

ran in between S' Hellena & Combohe where we lay at Anchorall ye time we staide
neare ye Place where ye distressed Indian soiourned, who were glad & crying Hiddy
doddy Comorado Angles Westoe Skorrye (which is as much as to say) English uery
good friends Westoes are nought, they hoped by our Arriuall to be protected from ye
Westoes, often making signes they would ingage them with their bowes & arrows, &
wee should with our guns they often brought vs veneson & some deare skins w*" wee
bought of them for beads. many of us went ashore at S* Hellena & brought back
word that ye Land was good Land supplyed with many Peach trees, & a Competence
of timber a few figg trees & some Cedar here & theire & that there was a mile & a half
of Cleare Land fitt & ready to Plante. Oysters in great plenty all ye Islands being
rounded w'" bankes of ye kinde, in shape longer & scarcely see any one round, yet
good fish though not altogether of soe pleasant taste as yo’ wall fleet oysters. here is
also wilde turke which ye Indian brought but is not soe pleasant to eate of as ye tame
but uery fleshy & farr bigger.

A sloop which had been sent to Kiawa to examine that place now
returned with a favorable report and the colonists sailed thither
and made the first permanent settlement in South Carolina.t At
this time we learn that that section of the province watered by the
Stono River was full of Indian settlements.?

In May of the same year a sloop called The Three Brothers an-
chored off Edisto Island—‘‘Odistash”’ as they call it—and two
chiefs, named Sheedou and Alush, who had been taken to Bar-
bados by Hilton, came out to them and directed them to Kiawa.?

In a letter written to Lord Ashley from this colony by William
Owen on September 15, 1670, he says, referring to the coast Indians:

We haue them in a pound, for to ye Southward they will not goe fearing the Yamases
Spanish Comeraro as ye Indians termes it. ye Westoes are behind them a mortall
enemie of theires whom they say are ye man eaters of them they are more afraid then
ye little children are of ye Bull beggers in England. to ye Northward they will
not goe for their they cry yt is Hiddeskeh, y‘ is to say sickly, soe y* they reckon them-
selves safe when they haue vs amongst them, from them there cann be noe danger
ap™hended, they haue exprest vs vnexpected kindness for when ye ship went to and
dureing her stay att Virginia provision was att the scarcest with us yet they daylie
supplied vs y* we were better stored att her return than when she went haueing 25
days provision in stoe beside 3 tunn of corne more w* they promised to procuer when
we pleased to com for it att Seweh.*

In a letter written to Lord Ashley on August 30, 1671, Maurice
Mathews says: .

The Indians all About vs are our friends; all y' we haue knowledge of by theyre
Appearance and traid with vs are as followeth:

St Helena ye Southermost; Ishpow, Wimbee, Edista, Stono, Keyawah, where we
now liue, Kussoo to ye westward of vs, Sampa, wando Ituan, Gt Pa;> Sewee, Santee,

1S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, pp, 166-168.

2 Carroll, Hist. Colls. 8. Car., 11, p. 452.

3 Tbid., p. 170.

4Tbid., pp. 200-201.

5 In a note the editor of the Shaftesbury Papers gives an alternative rendering St Pa, and queries whether
this vribe is the Sampa or Sampit repeated. There does not seem to be sufficient data for determining this
point.

68 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY . [ BULL. 73

Wanniah, Elasie, Isaw, Cotachicach, some of these haue 4 or 5 Cassikaes more, or
Less Truly to define the power of these Cassukaes I must say thus; it is noe more
(scarce as much) as we owne to ye Topakin in England, or A grauer person then our
selues; I finde noe tributaries among them, butt intermariages & pouerty causeth
them to visitt one Another; neuer quarrelling who is ye better man; they are generally
poore & Spanish; Affraid of ye very foot step of a Westoe; A sort of people y’ liue vp
to the westward [which these say eat people and are great warriors].!

Elsewhere in the same letter Mathews mentions an expedition
inland in which ‘‘ About 30 miles or more vpwards wee came Among
the Cussoo Indians our friends; with whome I had been twice before.’
This was on Ashley River.

In September, 1671, a war broke out with the Coosa Indians.
The occasion of this is given in the Council Journal under date of
September 27 as follows:

At a meeting of the Goverrour and Councill September 27th sitting and present
(the same [as given above]). The Governour and Councill taking into their serious
consideration the languishing condition that this Collony is brought into by reason
of the great quantity of corne from time to time taken out of the plantations by the
Kussoe and other Southward Indians and for as much as the said Indians will not
comply with any faire entreaties to live peaceably and quietly but instead thereof
upon every light occasion have and doe threaten the lives of all or any of our people
whom they will sufore (?) to them and doe dayly persist and increase in their insolen-
cyes soe as to disturb and invade some of our plantation in the night time but that
the evill of their intentions have hitherto been prevented by diligent watchings.
And for as much as the said Indians have given out that they intend for and with the
Spaniards to cutt off the English people in this place &c Ordered ordeyned by the
said Governuor &c Councill (nemine contra dicente) that an open Warr shall be
forthwith prosecuted against the said Kussoe Indians and their co-adjutors & for the
better effecting thereof that Commissions be granted to Capt. John Godfrey and Capt.
Thomas Gray to prosecute the same effectually. And that Mr. Stephen Bull doe
take into his custody two Kussoe Indians now in Towne and them to keepe with
the best security he may till he receive firther orders from this Board.?

As, in a letter written to Lord Ashley by Joseph West on Sep-
tember 3 preceding, the murder of an Indian by an Irish colonist is
referred to,? probably the provocation was not all on one side. This
war seems to have been pushed with exceeding vigor, since in the
Council Journal for October 2 we read:

Upon consideration had of the disposing of the Indian prisoners now brought in
for their better security and maintenance. It is resolved and ordered by the Grand
Councill that every Company which went out upon that expedition shall secure and
maintaine the Indians they have taken till they can transport the said Indians, but
if the remaining Kussoe Indians doe in the meanetime come in and make peace and
desire the Indians now prisoners then the said Indians shall be sett at Liberty having
first paid such a ransom as shall be thought reasonable by the Grand Council to be
shared equally among the Company of men that tooke the Indians aforesaid.*

1S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 334. The editor of the Shaftesbury Papers gives two other lists of these
Cusabo tribes. The first is dated in 1695-6 and mentions ‘“‘the natives of Sainte Helena, Causa, Wimbehe,
Combehe, Edistoe, Stonoe, Kiaway, Itwan, Seewee, Santee, Cussoes.’’ Causa does not appear again; Causa
and Cussoe may refer to two sections of the Coosa. The second list is dated in 1707 and refers to ‘those
called Cusabes, viz: Santees, Ittavans, Seawees, Stoanoes, Kiawaws, Kussoes, St. Helena &c. and Bohi-
cotts.’’ :

2S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., V, pp. 341-242.

3 Ibid., p. 338.

4 Ibid., v, pp. 344-345. See also Rivers, Hist. S. Car., pp. 105-106.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 69

The transporting of the Indians meant transport to the West
Indies as slaves, that being one of the amiable ways of civilizing
redskins to which our ancestors were addicted. The fate of these un-
fortunate Coosa is uncertain, but evidently the war came to an end
after the aforesaid expedition. From a note based on information
obtained from Governor West we learn that the—

Cossoes [were] to pay a dear skin monthly as an acknowledgm* or else to loose our
amitie.!

This must have been one of the agreements when peace was made.
In 1674, in some instructions to Henry Woodward, the Earl of
Shaftesbury says: ‘‘ You are to treate with the Indians of Edisto
for the Island and buy if of them and make a Friendship with
them.’’?

Whether the order was carried out at that time does not appear.
Meantime the Coosa Indians were again restless. The Council
Journals for August 3, 1674, contain the following:

And forasmuch as it is credibly informed that the Kussoe Indians have secretly
murdered 3 Englishmen and as these Indians have noe certaine abode Resolved that
Capt. Mau: Mathews, Mt W™ Owen, capt Rich? Conant & M? Ra: Marshall doe inquire
where the s4 Indians may be taken then to raise a party of men as they shall think
convent under command of the s* capt Conant or any other parties under other com-
manders to use all meanes to come up with the st Indians wheresoever to take or de-
atroy all or any of them, the whole matter being left to their advisem'.*

Still earlier the colonists had begun to experience difficulties with the
Stono, as this entry under date of July 25 attests:

For as &c it is credibly informed that the Indian Stonoe Casseca hath endeavored
to confederate certaine other Indians to murder some of the English nation & to rise
in Rebellion ag* this Settem* Resolved that capt. Mau: Mathews doe require & com-
mand nine men of the Inhabi's of this Settlem* to attend him in this exped® to take
the s* Indian and him cause to be brought to Charlestowne to answer to these things
but if any opposition happen the s4 capt. Mathews is to use his discret” in the managmt
thereof for the security of himself & the s* party of men whether by killing & destroying
the s‘ Indian & his confederates or otherwise.*

According to the Council Journals of January 15, 1675, “‘some
neighbor Indians” had expressed a desire to be settled into a town
near Charleston.‘

To carry out the terms of the constitution drawn up for Carolina
by John Locke a number of ‘‘baronies’’ were created in South Caro-
lina, many of them by purchase of land from the Indian proprietors.
Thus the land constituting Ashley barony on Ashley River was
obtained from the Coosa Indians who surrendered it in the following
terms:

To all menner of People, &c., know ye that wee, the Cassiques naturell Born Hears
& Sole owners & proprietors of great & lesser Cussoe, lying on the river of Kyewah, the

1S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 388. 3 Tbid., p. 451.
2 Ibid., p. 445. 4Ibid., p. 475.

70 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

River of Stonoe, & the freshes of the River of Edistah, doe for us ourselves, our sub-
jects & vassals, grant, &c., whole part & parcell called great & lesser Cussoe unto the
Right Hon®* Anthony Earl of Shaftsbury, Lord Baron Ashly of Wimborne St. Gyles,
Lord Cooper of Pawlet, &c., 10 March, 1675. Marks of The Great Cassiq, &c., an In-
dian Captain, a hill Captain, &c.!

To this are appended the signatures of several witnesses. What
appears to have been a still more sweeping cession was made to
Maurice Mathews in 1682 by the ‘‘chief of Stonah, chieftainess of
Edisloh, chief of Asshepoo, chieftainess of St. Hellena, chief of Com-
bahe, chief of Cussah, chief of Wichcauh, chief of Wimbee.’? In
1693 there was a short war with the Stono, a tribe which had already
showed itself hostile on more than one occasion.” The same year
we read that the Chihaw King complained of the cruel treatment
he had received from John Palmer, who had barbarously beaten and
cut him with his broadsword. These ‘“‘Chihaw”’ were perhaps in
South Carolina and not representatives of that much better known
band among the Creeks.* A body of Cusabo were in Col. John Barn-
well’s army raised to attack the Tuscarora in 1711-12.° In 1712 was
passed an act for ‘“‘settling the Island called Palawana, upon the
Cusaboe Indians now living in Granville County and upon their Pos-
terity forever.” From the terms of this act it appears that ‘‘most of
the Plantations of the said Cusaboes”’ were already situated upon
that island which is described as ‘‘near the Island of St. Helena,”
but that it had fallen into private hands.

The act reads as follows:

Whereas the Cusaboe Indians of Granville County, are the native and ancient
inhabitants of the Sea Coasts of this Province, and kindly entertained the first English
who arrived in the same, and are useful to the Government for Watching and Discov-
ering Enemies, and finding Shipwreck’d People; And whereas the Island called
Palawana near the Island of St. Helena, upon which most of the Plantations of the said
Cusaboes now are, was formerly by Inadvertancy granted by the Right Honorable the
Lords Proprietors of this Province, to Matthew Smallwood, and by him sold and trans-
ferred to James Cockram, whose Property and Possession it is at present; Be it En-
acted by the most noble Prince Henry Duke of Beauford, Palatine, and the Rest of
the Right Honorable the true and absolute Lords and Proprietors of Carolina, together
with the Advice and Consent of the Members of the General Assembly now met at
Charles-Town for the South West Part of this Province, That from and after the Rati-
fication of this Act, the Island of Palawana, lying nigh the Island of St. Helena, in
Granville County, containing between Four and Five Hundred Acres of Land, be it
more or less, now in the Possession of James Cockram as aforesaid, shall be and is
hereby declared to be invested in the aforesaid Cusaboe Indians, and in their Heirs
forever.®

1S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, pp. 456-457.

2 Rivers, Hist. S. Car., p. 38, 1856; Public Records of §. C., 36, p. 125.

3 Logan, a Hist. of the Upper Country of S. C., pp. 191-192; Carroll, Hist. Colls. S. Car., I, p. 74.
By later writers this disturbance was in some way associated with the Westo war and the Stono and
Westo were coupled together on this acco:mt and because of a superficial resemblance between their
names.

4 Carroll, op. cit., p. 116.

°S. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., 9, pp. 30-31, 1908.

6 Laws of the Province of South Carolina, by Nicholas Trott (1763), No. 338, p. 277, quoted by Thomas
in 18th Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pt. 2, p. 633.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 7]

In 1715 the Yamasee war broke out and it is commonly supposed
to have nearly exterminated the ancient tribes of South Carolina, one
early authority stating that ‘‘some of the Corsaboys”’ along with the
Congarees, Santees, Seawees, Pedees, and Waxaws were “utterly
extirpated,’’! but I quote this statement merely to refute it. As
a matter of fact, remnants of nearly all the ancient tribes persisted for
a considerable period afterwards. In 1716 there was a short war
between the colonists and the Santee and Congaree Indians. The
Etiwaw took part in this contest on the side of the whites. Over
half of the offending tribes were taken prisoners and sent as slaves to
the West Indies.? In the same year we find a note to the effect that
the colony had been presented with six dressed deerskins by the
‘‘Coosoe”’ Indians and twelve dressed and eight raw deerskins by the
‘“Ttawans.’’* In 1717 there is a note of a present made by the
“Kiawah” Indians.‘ In a letter written by Barnwell, April, 1720,
there is mention of the ‘‘Coosaboys:’’*® In 1727 we learn that ‘‘the
King of the Kywaws”’ desired recompense for some service, and, ap-
parently the same year, he was given a grant of land south of the
““Combee”’ River.° About 1743 Adair mentions ‘“‘Coosah’’ as a
dialect spoken in the Catawba nation, but it is not probable
that all of the Coosa removed there.7?. Some time after the founding
of Georgia an old man among the Creek Indians stated that the first
whites were met with at the mouth of the Coosawhatchie,’ and it ap-
pears that this report was current among the Creeks, although some-
times the name of Savannah River is substituted. The tradition is,
of course, correct, and it would seem probable that it was due not
merely to hearsay information but to the actual presence among the
Creeks of families or bands of Indians of Cusabo origin. Apart from
those who joined the Catawba, Creeks, and other tribes, the last glimpse
we have of the coast Indians shows the remnant of the Kiawa and
Cusabo in the neighborhood of Beaufort. We do not know whether
the Etiwaw and Wando were included among the Kiawa, but it is
probable that a part at least of all of these tribes remained near their
ancestral seats and were gradually merged in the surrounding popu-
lation.

The following remarks of Adair may well be inserted as the vale-
dictory of these people, although it applies also to the small Siouan
tribes northward of them and to some others:

\ Rivers, Hist. S. Car., pp. 93-94. ° Pub. Rec. of S. C., MS. vim, p. 4.
2 Pub. Rec. of S. C., MS. 6 Journal of the Council, S. C. docs., x, p. 24.
3 Proc. of Board dealing with Indian trade, MS., p.62. 7 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 225.

4 Thid., p. 186. 8 Carroll, Hist. Colls. S. Car., 1, XXXVII.

12 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

In most of our American colonies, there yet remain a few of the natives, who for-
merly inhabited those extensive countries; and as they were friendly to us, and sery-
iceable to our interests, the wisdom and virtue of our legislature secured them from
being injured by the neighboring nations. The French strictly pursued the same
method, deeming such to be more useful than any others on alarming occasions. We
called them ‘‘ Parched-corn-Indians,’’ because they chiefly use it for bread, are civ-
ilized, and live mostly by planting. As they had no connection with the Indian
nations [i. e., the Catawba, Cherokee, Muskogee, Chickasaw, and Choctaw], and
were desirous of living peaceable under the British protection, none could have any
just plea to kill or inslave them.’’!

ETHNOLOGICAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE CUSABO

Ethnological information regarding the Cusabo is scanty and
unsatisfactory, the interest of the colonists having been quickly
attracted to those great tribes lying inland which they called ‘‘na-
tions.”” Such material as is to be had must be interpreted in the
light of the fuller information to be gathered from larger southern
tribes like the Creeks, Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw. Never-
theless it is of interest to know that certain features of the lives of
these peoples were or were not shared by the ones better known.

The material gathered by the Spaniards as a result of the Ayllon
expedition has been given in connection with the account of that
venture, and will not be considered again. The region to which it
applies is too uncertain to consider it definitely under this head.
From the time of the French settlement in 1562, however, we
have a sufficiently clear localization, from the French, Spanish, and
English narratives successively. The greater part of our informa-
tion comes, however, from the French and English, the Spaniards
not having been interested in the people among whom they came or
not having published those papers which contained accounts of them.

The following general description of the appearance of the natives,
and their mental and moral characteristics, is from Alexander Hewat.
It does not apply to the Cusabo alone, but Hewat was probably better
acquainted with them than with any other Indians.

In stature they are of a middle size, neither so tall nor yet so low as some Europeans.
To appearance they are strong and well made; yet they are totally unqualified for
that heavy burden or tedious labour which the vigorous and firm nerves of Europeans
enable them to undergo. None of them are deformed, deformities of nature being
confined to the ages of art and refinement. Their colour is brown, and their skin
shines, being varnished with bears fat and paint. To appearance the men have no
beards, nor hair on their head, except a round tuft on its crown; but this defect is
not natural, as many people are given to believe, but the effect of art, it being custom-
ary among them to tear out such hair by the root. They go naked, except those
parts which natural decency teaches the most barbarous nations to cover. The huts
in which they live are foul, mean and offensive; and their manner of life is poor,

1 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 343.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 73

nasty, and disgustful. In the hunting season they are eager and indefatigable in
pursuit of their prey; when that is over, they indulge themselves in a kind of brutal
slumber, indolence, and ease. In their distant excursions they can endure hunger
long, and carry little with them for their subsistence; but in days of plenty they are
voracious as vultures. While dining in company with their chieftains we were
astonished at the vast quantity of meat they devoured. Agriculture they leave to
women, and consider it as an employment unworthy of a man: indeed they seem
amazingly dead to tender passions, and treat their women like slaves, or beings of
inferior rank. Scolding, insults, quarrels, and complaints are seldom heard among
them; on solemn occasions they are thoughtful, serious, and grave; yet I have seen
them free, open, and merry at feasts and entertainments. In their common deport-
ment towards each other they are respectful, peaceable, and inoffensive. Sudden
anger is looked upon as ignominious and unbecoming, and, except in liquor, they
seldom differ with their neighbour, or even do him any harm or injury. As for riches
they have none, nor covet any; and while they have plenty of provisions, they allow
none tosuffer through want; if they are successful in hunting, all their unfortunate or
distressed friends share with them the common blessings of life.!

This description has importance, not as a moral evaluation of these
people but as a set of impressions to be interpreted with due regard
to the standards and ideals in the mind of the observer himself.
Another writer says that bear grease was used on the hair to make it
grow and at the same time kill the vermin.? Another says of their
head hair that it was ‘‘tied in various ways, sometimes oyl’d and
painted, stuck through with Feathers for Ornament or Gallantry,”
and he adds that they painted their faces ‘‘ with different Figures of a
red or Sanguine Colour.’’* Their clothing consisted of bear or deer
skins dressed, it is said, ‘‘rather softer, though not so durable as ours
in England.’’* They were sometimes ornamented with black and
red checks.® Locke notes that they ‘dye their deer skins of excel-
lent colours.’’® Pearls were obtained from the rivers, and they
knew how to pierce them, but the process spoiled their value for
European trade. They made little baskets of painted reeds,’ and the
French found the house of Ouadé, which was, it is true, in the Guale ~
country, ‘““hung with feathers (plumasserie) of different colors, to
the height of a pike.”” ‘‘Moreover upon the place where the king
slept were white coverings woven in panels with clever artifice and
edged about with a scarlet fringe.’’?* These must have been either
cane mats or else textiles made of mulberry bark or some similar
material, like those fabricated throughout the south. The ‘‘panels”’
were probably the typical diagonal designs still to be seen on southern
baskets. The French add that Ouadé presented them with six
pieces of his hangings made like little coverings.

! Hewatin Carroll, Hist. Colls. 8. Car.,1, pp. 65-66. 6S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., V, p. 462.

2 Carroll, op. cit., 1, pp. 728. 7 Carroll, op. cit., 1, pp. 80-81.

* Tbid., p. 73. 8 Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, p. 48.
4 Ibid., p. 80. 9 Tbid., p. 49.

6 Tbid., pp. 80-81.

74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

What Oviedo records about the large communal house said to have
been found on this coast by the Spaniards early in the sixteenth cen-
tury has been given already.!| That they could build houses of con-
siderable size without much labor is clearly shown by the experience
of the French at Port Royal. One of their buildings described as “the
large house’ having been destroyed, the Indians of Maccou and
Audusta built another in less than 12 hours ‘‘scarcely smaller than the
one which had been burned.’’? As we have seen, Hewat speaks of
their houses as ‘‘foul, mean, and offensive,’’* but the structures seen
by Hilton and Sandford certainly did not deserve the censure of
meanness. Some of those noted by the former captain as having
been seen at St. Helena were evidently put up by Spaniards, but he
mentions one which was probably of native construction. At least
some of the features connected with it were native. This was ‘‘a
fair house builded in the shape of a Dove-house, round, two hundred
foot at least, compleatly covered with Palmeta-leaves, the wal-plate
being twelve foot high, or thereabouts, & within lodging rooms and
forms; two pillars at the entrance of a high Seat above all the rest.’’ 4
This ‘‘high seat’? was perhaps a chief’s seat such as were seen else-
where on the Cusabo coast. When Capt. Sandford visited the chief
Edisto town in 1666 he was ‘‘conducted into a large house of a Circu-
lar forme (their generall house of State).’’ Over against the en-
trance was ‘‘a high seate of sufficient breadth for half a dozen per-
sons,’ for the chief, his wife, eminent persons, and distinguished
visitors. Lower benches for the common people extended from the
ends of this on each side all the way to the door, and about the fire,
which was in the center of the building, were ‘‘little lowe foormes.”’
The town house of St. Helena is said to have been of the same pattern,
and was probably identical with that described by Hilton, as quoted
above.®

In hunting, their principal weapons were bows and arrows, the
latter made of reeds pointed with sharp stones or fishbones. The
Cusabo country abounded with game, its rivers and inlets with fish;
shellfish were also abundant along the coast. The deer was, as usual,
the chief game animal, the bear being hunted more for its fat than for
its flesh. According to Samuel Wilson, whose account was published
in 1682, deer were so plentiful ‘“‘that an Indian hunter hath killed
Nine fat Deere in a day all shot by himself, and all the considerable
Planters have an Indian Hunter which they hire for less than Twenty
shillings a year, and one hunter will very well find a Family of Thirty
people, with as much venison and foul as they can welleat.”’° What

1 See p. 48. 4 See p. 62.
2 Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, p. 50. 5 See p. 64.
3See p. 72. 6 Carvoli, op. cit., II, p. 28.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 15

the explorers in Hilton’s party have to say regarding native agricul-
ture has been given but may be requoted:

The Jndians plant in the worst Land because they cannot cut down the Timber in
the best, and yet have plenty of Corn, Pompions, Water-Mellons, Musk-mellons:
although the land be overgrown with weeds through their lasinesse, yet they have
two or three crops of Corn a year, as the Indians themselves inform us. !

Their treatment of corn was probably identical with that among
the other southern tribes. Mention is made by one writer of the
‘“‘cold meal’? made by parching ripe corn and pounding it into a
powder and of the convenience of this in traveling.2 Sandford
found extensive cornfields surrounding both Edisto and St. Helena,
but in Laudonniére’s time, at any rate, the Guale country seems
to have been superior agriculturally. Couexis, a Guale chief,
is reported as having ‘‘such a quantity of millet (ml), flour, and
beans that through his assistance alone they [the French] might have
provision for a very long time.’’* If the ‘‘mil”’ and “‘farine”’ are
supposed to refer to two different cereals one may have been wild
rice or something of the sort. Probably, however, both refer to
corn—one to the unground, the other to the ground or pounded corn.
Acorns and nuts were used, especially when other provisions had given
out. From the hickory nut, and probably from acorns also, they
expressed an oil of which it is said the English colonists also availed
themselves.*

It is interesting to observe that in the time of Hilton and Sandford
the Cusabo already had peaches and figs, and we must therefore
assign to these a Spanish origin. Laudonniére also mentions the
use of roots as food,® and the explorers under Hilton speak of a root
which grew in the marshes and of which the Indians made good
bread.® This was perhaps the ‘‘marsh potato,’’ but more likely the
kunti of the Creeks, a kind of smilax, for we know that bread was
made from this throughout the south.

The Cusabo used dugout canoes extensively and were expert
canoe men and good swimmers.’ Regarding their methods of
catching fish no word has been preserved. From the rapidity with
which they supplied the Frenchmen with cords for rigging it may be
inferred that fishing lines and nets were much in use.*

Regarding their government and social organization next to
nothing is known. Hewat says:

Although the Indians lived much dispersed, yet they united under one chief, and
formed towns, all the lands around which they claimed as their property. The bound-

1 See p. 63. 6 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 46.

2 Carroll, op. cit., p. 68. 8 See p. 63.
3 Laudonnieére, op. cit., p. 47. 7 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 27.

4 Carroll, op. cit., p. 64. 8 Thid., p. 53.

716 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

aries of their hunting grounds being carefully fixed, each tribe was tenacious of its
possessions, and fired with resentment at the least encroachment on them. Every
individual looked on himself as a proprietor of all the lands claimed by the whole
tribe, and bound in honor to defend them. !

And farther on:

With respect to internal government, these savages have also several customs and
regulations to which the individuals of the same tribe conform. Personal wisdom
and courage are the chief sources of distinction among them, and individuals obtain
rank and influence in proportion as they excel in these qualifications. Natural
reason suggests, that the man of the greatest abilities ought to be the leader of all
possessed of inferior endowments; in him they place the greatest confidence, and fol-
low him to war without envy or murmur. As this warrior arrives at honour and dis-
tinction by the general consent, so, when chosen, he must be very circumspect in
his conduct, and gentle in the exercise of his power. By the first unlucky or unpopu-
lar step he forfeits the goodwill and confidence of his countrymen, upon which all
his power is founded. Besides the head warrior, they have judges and conjurers,
whom they call Beloved Men, who have great weight among them; none of whom
have indeed any coercive authority, yet all are tolerably well obeyed. In this com-
monwealth every man’s voice is heard, and at their public demonstrations the best
speakers generally prevail. When they consult together about important affairs,
such as war or peace, they are serious and grave, and examine all the advantages and
disadvantages of their situation with great coolness and deliberation, and nothing is
determined but by the general consent.”

From the narratives of Hilton and Sandford we know that they
had town houses, corresponding evidently to the tcokofas of the
Creeks, and that there was an open space next to them in which the
chunky game was played,’ but they do not appear to have had the
outdoor council ground or ‘‘square.”’

The manner in which strangers of distinction were received is well
illustrated by the entertainment accorded Capt. Sandford at Edisto.4
When the chiefs encountered strangers at a distance from their towns
they had arbors constructed in the manner of the Florida Indians
in which the conference could take place and in which the conferees
could be screened from the sun.° When Captain Albert, the French
officer in charge of Charlesfort, visited the chief Stalame the latter
presented him on his arrival with a bow and arrows, “‘which is a sign
and confirmation of alliance among them.’’ He also presented him
with deerskins.*®

Regarding their customs in general and that.relating to war in
particular Hewat says:

Although in some particular customs the separate tribes of Indians differ from
each other, yet in their general principles and mode of government they are
very similar. All have general rules with respect to other independent tribes around
them, which they carefully observe. The great concerns relating to war or peace
are canvassed in assemblies of deputies from all the different towns. When injuries
are committed, and Indians of one tribe happen to be killed by those of another, then

1 Carroll, Hist. Colls. S. Car., 1, pp. 64-65. 4 See p. 64.
2 Tbid., pp. 68-69. ® Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 25.
3 See pp. 62-65. 6 Ibid., p. 43.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 77

such a meeting is commonly called. If no person appears on the side of the aggres-
sors, the injured nation deputes one of their warriors to go to them, and, in [the] name
of the whole tribe, to demand satisfactions. If this is refused, and they think them-
selves able to undertake a war against the aggressors, then a number of warriors,
commonly the relations of the deceased, take the field for revenge, and look upon it
as a point of honor never to leave it till they have killed the same number of the
enemy that had been slain of their kinsmen. Having accomplished this, they return
home with their scalps, and by some token let their enemy know that they are satis-
fied. But when the nation to whom the aggressors belong happen to be disposed to
peace, they search for the murderer, and they are, by the general judgment of the
nation, capitally punished, to prevent involving others in their quarrel, which act of
justice is performed often by the aggressor’s nearest relations. The criminal never
knows of his condemnation until the moment the sentence is put into execution,
which often happens while he is dancing the war dance in the midst of his neighbors,
and bragging of the same exploit for which he is condemned to die. . . .

The American savages almost universally claim the right of private revenge. It is
considered by them as a point of honor to avenge the injuries done to friends, par-
ticularly the death of a relation. Scalp for scalp, blood for blood, and death for
death, can only satisfy the surviving friends of the injured party. ... But should the
wife and aged men of weight and influence among the Indians interpose, on account
of the aggressor, perhaps satisfaction may be made by way of compensation. In this
case some present made to the party aggrieved serves to gratify their passion of revenge,
by the loss the aggressor sustains, and the acquisition of property the injured receives.
Should the injured friends refuse this kind of satisfaction, which they are entirely
at liberty to do, then the murderer, however high his rank may be, must be delivered
up to torture and death, to prevent the quarrel spreading wider through the nation ...
When war is the result of their councils, and the great leader takes the field, any
one may refuse to follow him, or may desert him without incurring any punishment;
but by such ignominious conduct he loses his reputation, and forfeits the hopes of
distinction and preferment. To honor and glory from warlike exploits the views of
every man are directed, and therefore they are extremely cautious and watchful against
doing any action for which they may incur public censure and disgrace. !

Regarding marriage, another writer says:

Polygamy is permitted among them, yet few have more than one wife at a time,
possibly on account of the expense of supporting them, for he is accounted a good
gunsman that provides well for one; besides the Indians are not of an amorous com-
plexion. Itiscommon with them, however, to repudiate their wives, if disobliged by
them or tired of them; the rejected woman, if with child, generally revenges herself
for the affront by taking herbs to procure an abortion—an operation that destroys
many of them, and greatly contributes to depopulate them.?

The Spanish missionary Rogel remarks on the monogamous condi-
tion of the Cusabo of his time as presenting a pleasing contrast to
the state of the Calusa of southern Florida, from whom he had just
come.*

Regarding adultery, Hewat says:

In case of adultery among Indians, the injured husband considers himself as under
an obligation to revenge the crime, and he attempts to cut off the ears of the adulterer,

1Carroll, op. cit., I, pp. 66-68, 69.

3 Tbid., pp. 517-518. Locke notes, however, that they were ‘‘kind to their women.’’—(S. Car. Hist. Soc.
Colls., V, p. 462.)

3See p. 57.

78 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

provided he be able to effect it; if not, he may embrace the first opportunity that
offers of killing him without any danger to his tribe. Then the debt is paid, and the
courage of the husband proved. !

No mention being made of punishment inflicted on the wife, it may
be concluded that the custom of punishing only the male offender
existed as it did among the Siouan tribes to the north.’

The comparative absence of theft among our southeastern Indians
is attested in this section also by the circumstance that when two
Indians whom Ribault had retained on board his vessel by force
escaped they left behind all of the presents the Frenchmen had made
them, although some of these were articles of high value in their eyes.*

A relation published in 1682 says of their religious beliefs:

Their religion chiefly consists in the adoration of the sun and moon. At the appear-
ance of the new moon I have observed them with open extended arms, then folded,
with inclined bodies, to make their adorations with much ardency and passion.*

The personal observation is of some value, but little or none can
be attached to the first statement, which seems to be made by
explorers in all parts of the world for want of any definite information.
Laudonniére notes of the two Cusabo Indians kept overnight on
Ribault’s vessel that they ‘‘made us to understand that before eating
they were accustomed to wash their faces and wait until the sun was
set,’’®> from which it may be inferred that they were fasting. The

fullest account of the religious beliefs of these people is the following

from Hewat:

The Indians, like all ignorant and rude nations, are very superstitious. They believe
that superior beings interfere in, and direct, human affairs, and invoke all spirits,
both good and evil, in hazardous undertakings. Each tribe have their conjurers and
magicians, on whose prophetic declarations they place much confidence, in all matters
relating to health, hunting, and war. They are fond of prying into future events,
and therefore pay particular regard to signs, omens, and dreams. They look upon
fire as sacred, and pay the author of it a kind of worship. At the time of harvest and
at full moon they observe several feasts and ceremonies, which it would seem were
derived from some religious origin. As their success, both in warlike enterprises and
in procuring subsistence depends greatly on fortune, they have a number of ceremo-
nious observances before they enter on them. They offer in sacrifice a part of the first
deer or bear they kill, and from this they flatter themselves with the hopes of future
success. When taken sick they are particularly prone to superstition, and their
physicians administer their simple and secret cures with a variety of strange ceremo-
nies and magic arts, which fill the patients with courage and confidence, and are
sometimes attended with happy effects.®

Among the Carolina notes in the Shaftesbury Papers is this by
Locke: ‘‘ Kill servants to wait on them in the other world.’’’ This
would be interesting if we could feel sure that it applied to the Indians

1 Carroll, op. eit., 1, p. 68. 5 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 28.
2 Lawson, Hist. Carolina, p. 306. 6 Carroll, op. cit., 1, pp. 69-70.
‘Laudonniére , op. cit., p. 31. 78. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 462.

4Carroll, op. cit., 1, pp. 80-81.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 79

of Carolina, and had not been picked up by Locke in the course of his
general reading.
In the matter of medicine another writer says:

In Medicine, or the Nature of Simpies, some have an exquisite knowledge; and in
the cure of Scorbutick, Venereal, and Malignant Distempers are admirable: In all
External Diseases they suck the part affected with many Incantations, Philtres and
Charms: In Amorous Intrigues they are excellent either to procure Love or Hatred;
They are not very forward in Discovery of their secrets, which by long Experience
are religiously transmitted and conveyed in a continued Line from one Generation
to another, for which those skill’d in this Faculty are held in great Veneration and
Esteem. !

Rogel refers to the Cusabo feasts, but only in a general way.’
It appears, however, that they had a festival of the first fruits like
other southern tribes. The only description of one of their ceremo-
nies, of any length, is given by Laudonniére. He calls this ceremony
“the feast of Toya,” and says that they kept it ‘‘as strictly as we do
Sunday.”’? It is probable that this corresponded to the Creek busk,
although agreeing with it in few formal particulars. Laudonniére’s
account runs as follows:

Since the time was near for celebrating their feasts of Toya, ceremonies strange to
recount, he [Audusta] sent ambassadors to the French to beg them on his part to be
present, which they agreed to very willingly, on account of the desire they had of
knowing what these were. They embarked then and proceeded toward the dwelling
of the king, who was already come out on the road before them in order to receive
them kindly, to caress them and conduct them into his house, where he exerted him-
self to treat them in the best manner of which he was capable.

However, the Indians prepared to celebrate the feast the next day, when the
king led them in order to see the place where the feast was to take place, and
there they saw many women about who were laboring with all their might to make
the place pure and clean. This place was a great compass of well leveled land of a
round shape. The next day then, very early in the morning, all those who were
chosen to celebrate the feast, being ornamented with paints and feathers of many
different colors, betook their way, on leaving the house of the king, toward the place
of Toya. Having arrived there they ranged themselves in order and followed three
Indians, who in paintings and manner of dress were different from the others. Each
one of them carried a little drum (tabourasse) on his fist, with which they began to
go into the middle of the round space, dancing and singing mournfully, being fol-
lowed by the others, who responded to them. After they had sung, danced, and
wheeled around three times they began running like unbridled horses through the
midst of the thickest forests. And the Indian women continued all the rest of the
day in tears so sad and lamentable that nothing more was possible, and in such fury
they clutched the arms of the young girls which they cut cruelly with well sharpened
mussel shells, so deep that the blood ran down from them, which they sprinkled in
the air crying‘‘he Toya” about three times. The king Audusta had withdrawn all
of our Frenchmen into his house during the ceremony, and was as grieved as possible
when he saw them laugh. He had done that all the more because the Indians are
very angry when one watches them during their ceremonies. However, one of our
Frenchmen managed so well that by stealth he got out of Audusta’s house and stealth-

! Carroll, op. cit., 1, pp. 80-81. 3 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 29.
4 See p. 57.

80 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

ily went to hide himself behind a thick bush, where at his pleasure he could easily
reconnoiter the ceremonies of the feast. The three who began the feast are called
joanas,! and are like priests or sacrificers according to the Mndian law, to whom they
give faith and credence in part because as a class? they are devoted to the sacrifices
and in part also because everything lost is recovered by their means. And not only
are they revered on account of these things but also because by I do not know what
science and knowledge that they have of herbs they cure sicknesses. Those who
had thus gone away among the woods returned two days later. Then, having arrived,
they began to dance with a courageous gayety in the very middle of the open space,
and to cheer their good Indian fathers, who on account of advanced age, or else their
natural indisposition, had not been called to the feast. All these dances having
been brought to an end they began to eat with an avidity so great that they seemed
rather to devour the food than to eat it. For neither on the feast day nor on the two
following days had they drunk or eaten. Our Frenchmen were not forgotten in this
good cheer, for the Indians went to invite them all, showing themselves very happy
at their presence. Having remained some time with the Indians a Frenchman gained
a young boy by presents and inquired of him what the Indians had done during
their absence in the woods, who gave him to understand by signs that the joanas had
made invocations to Toya, and that by magic characters they had made him come so
that they could speak to him and ask him many strange things, which for fear of
the joanas he did not dare to make known. They have besides many other ceremo-
nies which I will not recount here for fear of wearying the readers over matters of
such small consequence.*

Which shows that matters of small consequence to one generation
may become of great interest to later ones. Although the feast is
represented as of three days’ duration it is evident that this is only
one case of the common substitution by early writers of the European
sacred number 3 for the Indian sacred number 4. In this particular,
therefore, and in the careful clearing of the dance ground before the
ceremony, this feast recalls the Creek busk. The rest of it seems
to be entirely different, though the idea of retiring into the deep
forest to commune with deity is shared by all primitive peoples.

For any suggestions regarding the mortuary customs of the Cusabo
we must go back to the first attempt at settlement by the Span-
iards and Oviedo’s comments upon the country of Gualdape already
eiven.!

THE GUALE INDIANS AND THE YAMASEE

The coast of what is now the State of Georgia, from Savannah
River as far as St. Andrews Sound, was anciently occupied by a tribe
or related tribes which, whatever doubts may remain regarding the
people just considered, undoubtedly belonged to the Muskhogean
stock. This region was known to the Spaniards as “the province of
Guale (pronounced Wallie),’’ but most of the Indians living there
finally became merged with a tribe known as the Yamasee, and it

1 Hakluyt has “Iawas’’; see French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 204. 4 See p. 48.
2 Or perhaps “by birth.” : 5 See pp. 14-16.
3 Laudonniére, op. cit., pp. 43-46.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 81

will be well to consider the two together. From a letter of one of the
Timucua missionaries we learn that the Guale province was called
Ybaha by the Timucua Indians,’ and this is evidently the Yupaha ol
which De Soto was in search when he left the Apalachee. ‘Of the
Indians taken in Napetuca,”’ says Elvas, ‘‘the treasurer, Juan Gaytan,
brought a youth with him, who stated that he did not belong to that
country, but to one afar in the direction of the sun’s rising, from
which he had been a long time absent visiting other lands; that its
name was Yupaha, and was governed by a woman, the town she
lived in being of astonishing size, and many neighboring lords her
tributaries, some of whom gave her clothing, others gold in quan-
tity.”’? As the description of the town and its queen corresponds
somewhat with Cofitachequi, perhaps Ybaha or Yubaha was a general
name for the Muskhogean peoples rather than a specific designation of
Guale.

The towns of Guale lay almost entirely between St. Catherines
and St. Andrews Sounds. An early Spanish document refers to “the
22 chiefs of Guale.’’ Menéndez says there were “40 villages of
Indians” within 3 or 4 leagues. Between St. Catherines Sound and
the Savannah, where the province of Orista or Escamacu, the later
Cusabo, began, there appear to have been few permanent settle-
ments. South of St. Andrews Sound began the Timucua province.
When Governor Pedro de Ibarra visited the tribes of this coast
he made three stops at or near the islands of St. Simons, Sapello,
and St. Catherines, respectively, and at each place the chiefs assem-
bled to hold councils with him. It may reasonably be assumed that
the chiefs mentioned at each of these councils were those living nearer
that particular point than either of the others. In this way we
are able to make a rough division of the towns into three groups—
northern, central, and southern. Other towns are sometimes referred
to with reference to these, so that we may add them to one or
the other.

Thus the following towns appear as belonging to the northern
group, synonymous terms being placed in parentheses: Asopo
(Ahopo); Chatufo, Couexis (Cansin); Culapala (Culopaba); Guale
(Goale, Gale); Otapalas; Otaxe (Otax, Otafe); Posache; Tolomato
Tonomato); Uchilape; Uculegue (Oculeygue, Oculeya); Unallapa
(Unaleapa); Yfusinique; Yoa (Yua).

Asopo, Culupala, Guale, Otapalas, Otaxe, Uculegue, Unallapa, and
Yoa are given by Ibarra. Guale was the name of St. Catherines
Island, but the town was “on an arm of a river which goes out of
another which is on the north bank of the aforesaid port in Santa

1 Lowery, MSS. 2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, pp. 50-51.
148061°—22 6

82 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Elena in 32° N. lat.” Chatufo is mentioned in the narrative of a
visit to the Florida missions by the Bishop of Cuba, Couexis is given in
the French narratives; Menéndez changing it to Cansin.?_ Posache is
located “in the island of Guale.”’ Tolomato is described in one
place as ‘‘2 leagues from Guale,” and in another as on the mainland
near the bar of Capala (Sapello), and it is said to have been a place
from which one could go to the Tama Indians on the Altamaha
River. Uchilape is located “‘near Tolomato.”” Yfusinique was the
name of the town to which the chief Juanillo of Tolomato retired

after the massacre of the friars and where the other Indians be- .
sieged him. Yoa is said to have been 2 leagues by a river behind
an arm of the sea back of the bars of Capala and Cofonufo (Sapello
and St. Catherines Sounds). Large vessels could come within 1
league of it and small vessels could reach the town.’ In the account
of the massacre of the missionaries in 1597 Asopo (or Assopo) is de-
scribed as ‘‘in the island of Guale.’’*

Aluste (Alieste, Alueste, Aluete), Oya, Orista, Talapo (Talapuz or
Ytalapo), Ufalague (also spelled Ufalegue), Aobi, and Sufalate must
be classed as belonging properly to the Cusabo, the first five on the
basis of the information quoted above from Ibarra, and the last from
its association with Ufalague. Aobi may be intended, as already sug-
gested, for Ahoyabi. Although mentioned in connection with the
northern group of towns, they left the Cusabo country and settled
in the southern group, where Talapo and Ufalague are frequently
referred to.

The central towns were Aleguifa; Chucalagaite (Chucaletgate, Chu-
calate, Chucalae) ; Espogache (Aspoache) ; Espogue (Hespogue, Ospo-
gue, Espo, Ospo, Espoque); Fosquiche (Fasque); Sapala (Capala,
Capala); Sotequa; Tapala; Tulufina (Tolufina, Tolofina); Tupiqui
(Topiqui, Tuxiqui, Tupica); Utine (Atinehe).

Chiefs called Fuel, Tafecauca, Tumaque, and Tunague are also
mentioned, the last two distinct persons in spite of the close resem-
blance between their names. All of these towns and chiefs, except
Espogache, Tulufina, Aleguifa, and Chucalagaite, are given by
Ibarra. Fasquiche and Espogache were evidently not far from
Espogue. The last mentioned was on the mainland not more than
6 leagues from Talaxe.® Fasquiche is given in the account of a
visit to the Florida missions by the Bishop of Cuba. ‘Tulufina appears
to have been a place or tribe of importance intimately connected
with the interior Indians; the other two are placed ‘‘near Tulufina.”

1 This is about a third of a degree too far north. From this statement it appears that the town of Guale
was on Ossabaw Island, and this agrees with the position given it on Le Moyne’s map, on anisland between
the mouths of the rivers Grande and Belle.

2 If we follow Le Moyne we must place this on St. Catherines Island. (See preceding note.)

3The material in this paragraph is drawn from the Lowery MSS., except that regarding Couexis, for
which see p. 50.

4 See p. 86.

> See p. 20.

§ See p. 243,

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 83

An inland people known as Salchiches were represented at the
council which Ibarra held in this country. They appear to have
been Muskhogeans and seem to have had numerous relatives in the
province of Guale. In one place mention is made of ‘‘a chief of the
Salchiches in Tulufina.’”” In another we are told that the Timucua
chief of San Pedro laid the blame for the uprising of 1597 on the
people of Tulufina and the Salchiches. An Indian prisoner stated
that ‘‘the Indians of Cosahue (Cusabo) and the Salchiches, and those
of Tulufina and of Santa Elena had said that they would kill them
(the friars) and that each chief should kill his own friar.’ Else-
where the chief of Chucalagaite and the chief of the Salchiches are
mentioned, together with the statement that they were not Chris-
tians. It is said that the heir of Tolomato joined with ‘‘the other
Salchiches” to kill Fray de Corpa. In another place Tulufina and
the Salchiches are both referred to as if they were provinces of Tama.
The Tama were, as we have seen, an inland people who probably
spoke Hitchiti.!

The southern group of towns consisted of Aluque (Alaje); Asao
(Assaho) ; Cascangue (Oscangue, Lascangue) ; Falquiche (Falque) ; Fu-
loplata (possibly a man’s name); Hinafasque; Hocaesle; Talaxe
(Talax, Talaje); Tufulo; Tuque (or Suque); Yfulo (Fulo, Yfielo,
Ofulo).

All of these names except Tuque are from Ibarra’s letter. Cas-
cangue presents a puzzling problem, for it is referred to several times
as a Guale province, but identified by the Franciscan missionaries with
the province of Icafi, which was certainly Timucua. Until further
light is thrown upon the matter I prefer to consider the two as dis-
tinct. The name has a Muskhogean rather than a Timucua aspect.
Tuque is given in an account of a visit which the Bishop of Cuba
made to Florida in 1606 to confirm the Indians.

In addition to the towns which can be classified in this manner,
albeit a rough one, several towns and town chiefs are mentioned
which are known to belong to the Guale province, but can not be
located more accurately. They are the following:

Ahongate, an Indian of Tupiqui. Ahongate ‘‘ count! ’’ might be an appropriate
Creek personal name.

Alpatopo.

Aytochuco, Ytocugo.

Ayula.

Lonoche (or Donoche), an Indian of Ospo. Lonoche, ‘‘ Little Lone,”’ is still used
as a Creek name.

Olatachahane (perhaps a chief’s name).

Olatapotoque, Olata Potoque (given asa town, but perhaps achief’s name). It
was near Aytochuco.

Olataylitaba (or two towns, Olata and Litabi).

1 See p. 12.

84 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 73

Olocalpa.

Sulopacaques.

Tamufa.

Ymunapa.

The chief of each Guale town bore the title of mico, a circumstance
which, as has been shown, has important bearings in classifying the
people in the Muskhogean linguistic group. It appears also that
there was a head mico or ‘‘mico mayor”’ for the whole Guale proy-
ince. In 1596 a chief whom the Spaniards called Don Juan laid
claim to the title of head mico of Guale. There is some confusion
regarding him, for the text seems to identify him with a Timucua
chief. However, this claim elicited from the Spanish Crown a
request for an explanation of the term, to which Governor Mendez
de Can¢o replied:

In regard to your majesty’s instructions to report about the pretension of the cacique
Don Juan to become head mico, and to explain what that title or dignity is, he informs
me himself that the title of head mico means a kind of king of the land, recognized
and respected as such by all the caciques in their towns, and whenever he visits
one of them, they all turn out to receive him and feast him, and every year they pay
him a certain tribute of pearls and other articles made of shells according to the land.

Guale was thus a kind of confederacy with a head chief, more
closely centralized in that particular than the Creek confederacy.
It does not appear from the Spanish records whether the position
of head mico was hereditary or elective, but the latter is indicated.
When the Spaniards first came to Guale the head mico seems to have
lived in Tolomato, and mention is made of one Don Juanillo, ‘‘whose
turn it was to be head mico of that province.”! The friars are said to
have brought on the massacre of 1597 by depriving him of this office,
but they appear to have conferred it upon one of the same town.’
There were, however, three or four chiefs of particular estimation,
which are spoken of sometimes as lords of different parts of the
country, and when the Spaniards organized a native army to punish
those who had killed the friars, it was placed in charge of the chief
of Asao, who was head of the southern group of towns. In the nar-
rative which tells of a visit made to the missions in 1606 by the
Bishop of Cuba, Don Diego, chief of Talaxe and Asao, is represented
as overlord or ‘‘head mico”’ of the entire province.

Gualdape may perhaps be a form of Guale and the imformation
obtained regarding the people there by the Ayllon colonists appli-
cable rather to the Guale Indians than the Cusabo.? In the narra-
tives of the French Huguenot colony of 1562, as we have seen,
Guale appears as Ouadé and a neighboring town or tribe is mentioned
called Couexis.? All that the French have to tell us about these

1 One Spanish document registers the primacy of Tolomatoin these words: ‘‘I-a lengua de Guale de que
es mico y cabeca Tolomato.”’

2 See p. 41.

3 See p. 50.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 85

two I have given and I have recorded Menéndez’s visit to Guale and
the settlement of Jesuit missionaries there and at St. Helena. In
his letter to Menéndez, quoted above, Rogel says:

Brother Domingo Augustin was in Guale more than a year, and he learned that
language so well that he even wrote a grammar, and he died; and Father Sedefio was
there 14 months, and the father vice provincial 6, Brother Francisco 10, and Father
Alamo 4; and all of them have not accomplished anything.!

Had the grammar of Augustin been preserved we would not to-day
consider the labors of these early missionaries by any means fruit-
less; and it may yet come to light.

In 1573 a Spanish officer named Aguilar and fourteen or fifteen
soldiers were killed in the province of Guale. In 1578 Captain
Otalona and other officials were killed in the Guale town of Ospogue or
Espogue.’

After this field had been abandoned by the Society of Jesus it was
entered by the Franciscans. According to Barcia, missions were
opened in Guale by them in 1594, but unpublished documents seem
to set a still earlier date. One of these would place the beginning
of the work as far back as 1587. In 1597 there were five missionaries
in this province and the work seemed to be of the utmost promise,
when a rebellion broke out against the innovators, the mission sta-
tions were burned, and all but one of the friars killed. The follow-
ing account contained in Barcia’s Florida is from clerical sources:

The friars of San Francisco busied themselves for two years in preaching to the
Indians of Florida, separated into various provinces. In the town of Tolemaro or
Tolemato lived the friar Pedro de Corpa, a notable preacher, and deputy of that doc-
trina, against whom rose the elder son and heir of the chief of the island of Guale, who
was exceedingly vexed at the reproaches which Father Corpa made to him, because
although a Christian, he lived worse than a Gentile, and he fled from the town because
he was not able to endure them. He returned to it within a few days, at the end of
September [1597], bringing many Indian warriors, with bows and arrows, their heads
ornamented with great plumes, and entering in the night, in profound silence, they
went to the house where the father lived; they broke down the feeble doors, found
him on his knees, and killed him with an axe. This unheard-of atrocity was pro-
claimed in the town; and although some showed signs of regret, most, who were as
little disturbed, apparently, as the son of the chief, joined him, and he said to them
the day following: ‘‘Although the friar is dead he would not have been if he had not
prevented us from living as before we were Christians: let us return to our ancient
customs, and let us prepare to defend ourselves against the punishment which the
governor of Florida will attempt to inflict upon us, and if this happens it will be as
rigorous for this friar alone as if we had finished all; because he will pursue us in the
same manner on account of the friar whom we have killed as for all.”’

Those who followed him in the newly executed deed approved; and they said that
it could not be doubted that he would want to take vengeance for one as he would take
it for all. Then the barbarian continued: “Since the punishment on account of one
is not going to be greater than for all, let us restore the liberty of which these friars

1 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, p. 307; Barcie, La Florida, pp. 138-139.
2 Lowery, MSS.

86 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

have robbed us, with promises of benefits which we have not seen, in hope of which
they wish that those of us who call ourselves Christians experience at once the losses
and discomforts: they take from us women, leaving us only one and that in perpetuity,
prohibiting us from changing her; they obstruct our dances, banquets, feasts, cele-
brations, fires, and wars, so that by failing to use them we lose the ancient valor and
dexterity inherited from our ancestors; they persecute our old people calling them
witches; even our labor disturbs them, since they want to command us to avoid it on
some days, and be prepared to execute all that they say, although they are not satis-
fied; they always reprimand us, injure us, oppress us, preach to us, call us bad Chris-
tians, and deprive us of all happiness, which our ancestors enjoyed, with the hope
that they will give us heaven. These are deceptions in order to subject us, in holding
us disposed after their manner; already what can we expect, except to be slaves? If
now we kill all of them, we will remove such a heavy yoke immediately, and our
valor will make the governor treat us well, if it happens that he does not come out
badly.’’? The multitude was convinced by his speech; and asa sign of their victory,
they cut off Father Corpa’s head, and they put it in the port! on a lance, as a trophy of
their victory, and the body they threw into a forest, where it was never found.

They passed to the town of Topiqui, where lived Fr. Blas Rodriguez (Torquemada
gives him the appelation of de Montes), they went in suddenly, telling him they came
to killhim, Fr. Blas asked them to let him say mass first, and they suspended their
ferocity for that brief time; but as soon as he had finished saying it, they gave him so
many blows, that they finished him, and they threw his body outside, so that the
birds and beasts might eat it, but none came to it except a dog, which ventured to
touch it, and fell dead. An old Christian Indian took it up and gave it burial in the
woods.

From there they went to the town of Assopo, in the island of Guale, where were
Fr. Miguél de Aufion, and Fr. Antonio Badajoz; they knew beforehand of their
coming, and seeing that flight was impossible, Fr. Miguél began to say mass, and
administered the sacrament to Fr. Antonio, and both began to pray. Four hours
afterward the Indians entered, killed friar Antonio instantly with a club (macana);
and afterward gave friar Miguél two blows with it, and, leaving the bodies in the same
place, some Christain Indians buried them at the foot of a very high cross, which the
same friar Miguél had set up in the country.

The Indians, continuing their cruelty, set out with great speed for the town of
Asao where lived friar Francisco de Velascola, native of Castro-Urdiales, a very poor
and humble monk, but with such forcefulness that he caused the Indians great fear:
he was at that time in the city of St. Agustine. Great was the disappointment of the
Indians, because it appeared to them that they had done nothing if they left the friar
Francisco alive. They learned in the town the day when he would return to it, went
to the place where he was to disembark, and some awaited him hidden in a clump
of rushes, near the bank. Friar Francisco arrived ina canoe, and, dissimulating,
they surrounded him and took him by the shoulders, giving him many blows, with
clubs (macanas) and axes, until his soul was restored to God.

They passed to the town of Ospo, where lived friar Franciso Davila,” who as soon as
he heard the noise at the doors was able under cover of night to go out into the country;
the Indians followed him, and although he had hidden himself in some rushes, by
the light of the moon they pierced his shoulders with three arrows; and wishing to
continue until they had finished him, an Indian interposed, in order to possess him-
self of his poor clothing, which he had to do in order that they might leave him, who
took him bare and well bound, and he was carried to a town of infidel Indians to serve
asaslave. These cruelties did not fail to receive the punishment of God; for many
of those who were concerned in these martyrdoms hung themselves with, their bow-

1 This word, puerto, may be a misprint of puerta, gate.
2 This name is given farther on as de Avila or Avila. See p. 87.

oy
3

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 87

strings, and others died wretchedly; and upon that province God sent a great famine
of which many perished, as will be related.

The good success of these Indians caused others to unite with them, and they
undertook to attack the island of San Pedro with more than 40 canoes, in order to put
an end to the monks who were there, and destroy the chief, who was their enemy.
They embarked, provided with bows, arrows, and clubs; and, considering the victory
theirs, they discovered, near the island, a brigantine, which was in the harbor where
they were to disembark, and they assumed that it had many people and began to
debate about returning. The brigantine had arrived within sight of the island 30
days before with succor of bread and other things, which the monks needed; but
they had not been able to reach the port, although those who came in it tried it many
times, nor to pass beyond, on account of a bar (cao) which formed itself from the
mainland (?) a thing which had never happened before in that sea. It carried only
one soldier, and the other people were sailors, and even less than the number needed
for navigation.

Finding the Indian rebelsin this confusion the chief of the island went out to defend
himself with a great number of canoes.'. He attacked them with great resolution;
and although they tried to defend themselves, their attempt was in vain, they fled,
and those who were unable to jumped ashore; and the chief, collecting some of his
enemies’ canoes, returned triumphantly to his island, and the friars gave him many
presents, with which he remained as satisfied as with his victory.

Of the others who had sprung to land none escaped, because they had no canoes —
in which they might return; some hung themselves with their bowstrings, and others
died of hunger in the woods.

Nor were those exempt who escaped, because the governor of Florida, learning of
the atrocities of the Indians, went forth to punish the evildoers; but he was only able
to burn the cornfields, because the aggressors retired to the marshes, and the high-
lands prevented him from punishing them, except with the famine which followed
immediately the burning of the harvests, of which many Indians died. . . .

The Indians kept the friar Francisco de Avila in strict confinement, ill-treating
him much; afterwards they left him more liberty in order to bring water and wood,
and watch the fields. They turned him over to the boys so that they might shoot
arrows at him; and although the wounds were small, they drained him of blood,
because he was not able tostop the blood; this apostolic man suffering these outrages
with great patience and serenity. P

Wearied of the sufferings of Father Avila the Indians determined to burn him
alive. They tied him to a post, and put much wood under him. When about to
burn him, there came to the chief one of the principal Indian women, whose son the
Spaniards held captive in the city of St. Agustine without her having been able to
find any way to rescue him although she had tried it. This moved her to beg the
chief earnestly that he should give friar Francisco to her to exchange him for her son.
Other Indians, who desired to see him free, begged the same thing; and although it
cost them much urging to appease the hatred of the chief for the father, he granted
what the Indian woman asked, giving him to her so badly treated, that he arrived
at St. Agustine in such a condition that they did not recognize him: he had endured
such great and such continuous labors. He accomplished the exchange, and the
people of the city expressed a great deal of sympathy for friar Francisco.

God wished to give a greater punishment to the Indians of Florida, who killed the
missionaries so unjustly; and, refusing water to the earth, upon the burning of the
crops, there began such a great famine in Florida that the conspirators died mis-
erably themselves, confessing the cause of their misfortune to have been the barbarity,
which they exercised against the Franciscan monks.”

1 It appears from unpublished Spanish décuments that he sent two canoes against two which the enemy
had dispatched in advance.
2 Barcia, La Florida, pp. 170-172.

88 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Davila was liberated in 1599, and Barcia speaks as if the famine
occurred the year following.

A letter containing an account of this uprising and accompanied
by testimony taken from several witnesses is preserved among the
Spanish archives and a copy of this is in the Lowery collection. While
less dramatic, naturally, than the narrative given, it differs in no
essential particulars. The governor’s punitive expedition was in
1597 or very early in 1598. He burned the principal Guale towns,
including their granaries, and quickly reduced the greater part of
the people to submission. In a letter of date 1600 he says:

No harm, not even death, that I have inflicted upon them has had as much weight
in bringing them to obedience as the act of depriving them of their means of sub-
sistence.

In the same letter he has some additional information regarding
the causes of the war which do not appear in the communications of
the missionaries. He states that it was Don Juanillo’s turn to be
head mico of Guale, but—
owing to his being a quarrelsome and warlike young man, he was deprived of that
dignity by the Rev. Friars Pedro de Corpa and Blas Rodriguez, who conferred it upon
Don Francisco, a man of age and of good and humble habits. And this caused the
massacre of the friars, among whom were the two mentioned. Although in the depo-
sitions that I took from several Indians in regard to that massacre they all affirmed
that to have been the direct cause for the commission of that crime, yet I never allowed
it to be written, as I could not consent to have anything derogatory to the priests
made public, and besides I look upon the Indians as being very little truthful and
to cover their treachery would invent many lies.

Yet it is strange that Don Juanillo and Don Francisco were both
leaders of the hostile Indians, and were irreconcilable to the last.

The chief of Espogache was among the first to surrender and he was
quickly followed by others. In a letter written April 24, 1601, Goy.
de Cango states that the chief of Asao and 40 Indians had just
come to tender their submission and that all had given in except
the chief of Tolomato, his nephew, and two other chiefs.? Later the
same year the governor induced the chief of Asao to head an expedi-
tion against this refractory element, he being one of the chiefs of most
consideration in.the province. This mico solicited assistance from
the chiefs of Tulufina, Guale, Espogache, Yoa, Ufalague, Talapo,
Olata Potoque, Ytocug¢o, the chiefs of the Salchiches, the Tama, and
the Cusabo. Don Juanillo and his partisans had established them-
selves in a stockaded town called Yfusinique and met the first attack
of their more numerous foes so valiantly that many of them were
killed. The allied chiefs then decided that a general assault would be
necessary, and this was successful. Don Juanillo and Don F[ran-
cisco were killed and their scalps taken and with them fell great

! The above material is from the Brooks and Lowery MSS. in the Library of Congress,
4 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 161.

“st Rew

SWANTON | EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 89

numbers of their warriors, including 24 principal men. The remain-
der were taken back to Tamufa, from which the expedition had
started."

In a report on his missionary work dated September 15, 1602,
Fray Baltazar Lopez, who was stationed at San Pedro, says that
there were then no missionaries in the province of Guale, but more
than 1,200 Christian Indians.?

In 1604, as we have seen, in November, Gov. Pedro de Ibarra
visited San Simon, Sapelo, and Guale. One of his objects was to
listen to complaints and compose differences, but he represented
as almost equally important his desire to see the province Chris-
tianized. By that time a church had been built at Asao, on or near
San Simon, and another in Guale, while a third was to be constructed
at Kspogache near Sapelo. Ibarra was accompanied on this expe-
dition by Fray Pedro Ruiz, then in charge of the doctrina at San
Pedro, who said mass in each place? When the Bishop of Cuba
visited Florida in 1606 Ruiz was in immediate charge of the doctrina
of Guale, and Fray Diego Delgado was located at the doctrina of
Talaxe, close to Asao, from which he occasionally visited Espogache.
The province of Guale was soon thoroughly missionized and work
there continued until the practical destruction of the province in the
latter part of the century. In a letter of 1608 we find a note to the
effect that five Guale chiefs had rebelled, but nothing more is said
about the disturbance, which must have been of small consequence.
Another letter, dated April 16, 1645, states that the Indians of Guale
were then in insurrection, but could be readily reduced.? The list
of Florida missions, made in 1655, mentions four or five belonging to
the province of Guale, San Buenaventura de Boadalquivi [Guadal-
quini] on Jekyi Island, Santo Domingo de Talaje on or near the
present St. Simons, San Josef de Zapala on or near Sapelo, Santa
Catarina de Guale on St. Catherines Island, and perhaps Santiago de
Ocone, which is said to have been on an island 30 leagues from St.
Augustine, and therefore perhaps near Jekyl Island.t It is evident
that the attacks of the northern Indians, which were soon to put
an end to the missions entirely, had begun at this date, because we
find Santiago, mico of Tolomato, and his people located 3 leagues
from St. Augustine, between two creeks, evidently those called San
Diego Tolomato, or North River, and Guana. This was the mis-
sion station of Nuestra Sefiora de Guadalupe de Tolomato, which
appears again in the list of 1680. In 1661, as we learn by letters
from Goy. D. Alonso de Aranguiz y Cotes to the king, Guale was
invaded by Indians, ‘‘said to be Chichumecos,” but probably, as
we shall see, Yuchi. From the letter of a soldier setting forth his

1 Lowery and Brooks, MSS., Lib. Cong. 8 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 164-193.
2 Lowery, MSS. 4 See p. 322; and Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 182.

90° BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

past services it appears that these strangers sacked the churches and
convents and killed many Christian Indians, but were driven off by
a force sent from St. Augustine."

When South Carolina was settled, in the year 1670, the English
found the post and missions about Port Royal abandoned, but those
in Guale still flourishing. In a letter to Lord Ashley, dated the
same year, William Owen says:

There are only foure [Spanish missionaries] betweene us and St. Augustines. Our
next neighbour is he of Wallie weh ye Spaniard calls St Katarina who hath about 300?
Indians att his devoir. With him joyne ye rest of ye Brotherhood and cann muster
upp from 700 hundred Indians besides those of ye main they vpon any vrgent occa-
sions shall call to their assistance, they by these Indians make warr with any other
people yt disoblige them and yet seem not to be concerned in ye matter.”

In addition to Nuestra Sefiora de Guadalupe de Tolomato, four
Guale missions appear in the mission list of 1680, viz, San Buenaven-
tura de Ovadalquini, Santo Domingo de Assaho, San Joseph de
Capala, and Santa Cathalina de Guale. They were placed in one
province with two Timucua missions, the whole being called the
Provincia de Guale y Mocama.' Mocama means ‘‘on the sea”’ in
Timucua, the Timucua towns in this province being on and near the
Atlantic.

Through a letter written to the court of Spain May 14, 1680, we
learn that the ‘‘Chichumecos, Uchizes, and Chiluques (i. e., the
Yuchi, Creeks, and Cherokee) had made friends with the English
and had jointly attacked two of the Guale missions. The writer
says that (apparently in the year preceding) :

They entered all together, first that on the island of Guadalquini, belonging to said
province [of Guale]. There they caused several deaths, but when the natives ap-
peared led by my lieutenant, to defend themselves, they retired and within a few
days they entered the island of Santa Catalina, capital and frontier post, against
these enemies. They were over three hundred men strong, and killed the guard of
six men, with the exception of one man who escaped and gave the alarm, thus enab-
ling the inhabitants of that village to gather for their defense. They consisted of
about 40 natives and five Spaniards of this garrison, who occupied the convent of the
friar of that doctrina, where a few days previously captain Francisco Fuentes, my
lieutenant of that province had arrived. He planned their defense so well and with
such great courage that he kept it up from dawn until 4 p. m. with sixteen Indians
who had joined him with their firearms (on this occasion I considered it important
that the Indians should carry firearms). As soon as I was advised of what had occur-
red I sent assistance, the first three days ahead. Then I sent a body of about thirty
men and a boat with thirteen people, including the sailors, but when they arrived
the enemy had retreated. I am assured that among them [the enemies] there came
several Englishmen who instructed them, all armed with long shotguns, which caused
much horror to those natives, who abandoned the island of Santa Catalina. I am
told that they might return to live there if the garrison be doubled. As I have heard
that they had eight men there from this garrison, I have resolved to send as many as

1 Lowery, MSS. 1S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 198.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS Q]

twenty, because it is very important to support the province of Guale for the sake of
this garrison, as well for its safety and conservation as for its subsistence and protec-
tion against invasion as it is the provider of this garrison on account of its abundance
and richness compared with this place which is so poor. I am always afraid that they
might penetrate by the sandbar of Zapata [Zapala].'

That the friars were not in all cases protectors of the Indians
appears from a letter written to Governor Cabrera by ‘‘the casique
of the province of Guale,’’ dated May 5, 1681, complaining of their
arbitrary and overbearing attitude. Cabrera was, however, no
lover of friars. Meantime the pressure of the northern Indians
continued. Cabrera, in a letter dated December 8, 1680, speaks of
what appears to have been a second invasion of Guale by the Eng-
lish and ‘‘Chuchumecos,” and in one of June 14, 1681, he states
that some Guale Indians had taken to the woods, while others had
assembled in the Florida towns farther south, the town of Carlos,
‘40 leagues from St. Augustine,’ being particularly mentioned.
Several invasions appear to have taken place at about this time and
a letter, written March 20, 1683, states that Guale had been totally
ruined by them.’

In 1682 the South Carolina Documents refer to ‘‘the nations of
Spanish Indians, which they call Sapalla, Soho [Asaho], and Sapic-
bay,’’ and from the identity of the first two it is probable that all
were Guale tribes.*

We now come to the final abandonment of Guale, both by Span-
iards and Indians; and here our authorities do not agree. Barcia,
presumably relying upon documents to which no one else has had
access, states that the governor of Florida wished to remove the
Indians forcibly to islands nearer St. Augustine, whereupon they
rebelled and took to the woods or passed over to the English. Cer-
tain manuscript authorities, however, represent the removal as
having been at the request of the Indians themselves, and the raid
upon St. Catherines mentioned above doubtless had something to
do with it. Barcia’s account runs thus:

[Don Juan Marquez] had occasioned a rebellion of the Indians of the towns of San
Felipe, San Simon, Santa Catalina, Sapala, Tupichihasao, Obaldaquini, and others,
because he wanted to move them to the islands of Santa Maria, San Juan, and Santa
Cruz, and in order to escape this transplantation many fled to the forests, and others
passed to the province of 8. Jorge, or Carolina, a colony made shortly before by the
English in the country of the Spaniards, upon which Virginia joins, and bordering upon
Apalachicolo, Caveta, and Casica .. . #

The name Tupichihasao seems to combine the names of the towns
Topiqui and Asao (or Hasao), which were probably run together in

2 Lowery, MSS., Lib. Cong. 4 Barcia, La Florida, p. 287.

99 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73 -

merely the Indian name of the St. Simons mission. The San Felipe
mission must have been a comparatively new one; it evidently had
nothing to do with the former Fort Felipe at St. Helena, which had
been long abandoned.

An entirely different view of this Indian movement is given in a
letter from the King of Spain, dated September 9, 1688, from which
it appears that the chiefs and natives of Guale had asked to be
settled where they could enjoy more quiet and had chosen the
islands of San Pedro, Santa Maria, and San Juan. It was, however,
decided to assign them the last two of these, and instead of San
Pedro a third nearer St. Augustine, called Santa Cruz.

An interesting glimpse of these missions is furnished us by the
Quaker Dickenson in 1699, when he and his companions who had
been shipwrecked on the southeast coast of Florida passed north
from St. Augustine on their way to Carolina. He says:

Taking our departure from Augustine [Sept. 29] we had about 2 or 3 leagues to an
Indian town called St. a Cruce, where, being landed. we were directed to the Indian
warehouse [town house]. It was built round, having 16 squares,? and on each square a
cabin * built and painted, which would hold two people, the house being about 50 feet
diameter; and in the middle of the top was a square opening about 15 feet. This house
was very clean; and fires being ready made nigh our cabin, the Spanish captain made
choice of cabins for him and his soldiers and appointed us our cabins. In this town
they have a friar and a large house to worship in, with three bells; and the Indians
go as constantly to their devotions at all times and seasons, as any of the Spaniards.
Night being come and the time of their devotion over, the friar came in, and many of
the Indians, both men and women, and they had a dance according to their way and
custom. We had plenty of Casseena drink, and such victuals as the Indians had pro-
vided for us, some bringing corn boiled, others pease; some one thing, some another;
of all which we made a good supper, and slept till morning.

This morning early [Sept. 30] we left this town, having about 2 leagues to go with the
canoes, and then we were to travel by land; but a cart was provided to carry our provi-
sions and necessaries, in which those that could not travel were carried. We had about
5 leagues to a sentinel’s house, where we lay all night, and next morning travelled
along the sea shore about 4 leagues to an inlet. Here we waited for canoes to come for
us, to carry us about 2 miles to an Indian town called St. Wan’s [San Juan’s], being on
an island. We went through a skirt of wood into the plantations, fora mile. In the
middle of this island is the town, St. Wan’s, a large town and many people; they have
a friar and worship house. The people are very industrious, having plenty of hogs,
fowls, and large crops of corn, as we could tell by their corn houses. The Indians
brought us victuals as at the last town, and we lay in their warehouse, which was
larger than at the other town.

This morning [Oct. 2] the Indians brought us victuals for breakfast, and the friar
gave my wife some loaves of bread made of Indian corn which was somewhat ex-
traordinary; also a parcel of fowls.

About 10 o’clock in the forenoon we left St. Wan’s walking about a mile to the
sound; here were canoes and Indians ready to transport us to the next town. We did

1 Brooks, MSS. Miss Brooks has given the name of this king as Philip IV, but he was long dead and
Charles Il was on the throne. For the location of these islands see p. 51 and plate 1.

2 This term seems to be applied to the spaces between the vertical wall timbers.

3 Old name for a bed raised on posts close to the wall of an Indian house.

PRG EE EL EEION

RIS

ee Mee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 93
believe we might have come all the way along the sound, but the Spaniards were not
willing to discover the place to us.

An hour before sun set we got to the town call’d St. Mary’s. This was a frontier and
garrison town; the inhabitants are Indians with some Spanish soldiers. We were con-
ducted to the ware house, as the custom is, every town having one: we understood
these houses were either for their times of mirth and dancing, or to lodge and entertain
strangers. The house was about 31 feet diameter,! built round, with 32 squares; in
each square a cabin about 8 feet long, of good height, painted and well matted. The
centre of the building is a quadrangle of 20 feet, being open at the top, against which
the house is built. In this quadrangle is the place they dance, having a great fire in
the middle. In one of the squares is the gate way or passage. The women natives of
these towns clothe themselves with the moss of trees, making gowns and petticoats
thereof. which at a distance, or in the night, looks very neat. The Indian boys we
saw were kept to school in the church, the friar being their schoolmaster. This was the
largest town of all, and about a mile from it was another called St. Philip’s. At St.
Mary’s we were to stay till the 5th or 6th inst. Here we were to receive our 60 roves
of corn and 10 of pease. While we staid we had one half of our corn beaten into meal
by the Indians, the other we kept whole, not knowing what weather we should have.
. . . We got of the Indians plenty of garlick and long pepper, to season our corn and
pease, both of which are griping and windy, and we made wooden trays and spoons to
eat with. We got rushes and made a sort of plaited rope thereof; the use we intended
it for, was to be serviceable to help us in building huts or tents with, at such times as
we should meet with hard weather . .

We departed this place [Oct. 6] and put into the town of St. Philip’s, where the
Spanish Captain invited us on shore to drink Casseena, which we did: the Spaniards,
having left something behind, we staid here about an hour, and then set forward.

About 2 or 3 leagues from hence we came in sight of an Indian town called Sap-
pataw.’’?

“‘Sappataw” is probably a misprint for Sappalaw, i. e., Sapelo.
Some, and probably all, of these missions were on the sites of former
missions occupied by Timucua, but most of the latter Indians must
have died out or been removed. Atleast, Dickenson says in two places
that the Indians living there were ‘‘related”’ to the Yamasee then in
Carolina.’

If Barcia may be trusted, a considerable number of Guale Indians
fled to South Carolina at the time when the remainder of the tribe
was removed to Florida. In 1702 a second outbreak occurred, re-
sulting, apparently, in the reunion of all of the Guale natives on
Savannah River, in the edge of the English colony and under the
lead of the Yamasee. These two rebellions are indicated in the legend
on an early Spanish map which states that the Spaniards occupied
San Felipe, Guale, and Sapelo until 1686, when they withdrew to
St. Simons, and that in 1702 St. Simons was also abandoned. It
is clear, however, from Dickenson’s narrative that the Georgia coast
had been practically given up in his time, so that the ‘‘withdrawal”’

1 This figure is too small, perhaps due to a misprint; 32 squares 8 feet long would mean a circumference of
256 feet and a diameter of 70-80 feet. The figure 3in 31is probably a misprint for 8 as suggested by Bushnell
(see below).

2 Dickenson, Narrative, pp. 90-94. See D.I. Bushnell, Jr., in Bull. 69, Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 84-85,
who gives diagrammatic plans of the town houses.

3 Dickenson, Narrative, pp. 94, 96.

94 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

from St. Simons meant in reality the removal of the remaining
Guale Indians from Florida. Probably most of those who fled to the
English at the earlier date were from the northern part of the Georgia
coast, while those who went to Florida were principally from St.
Simons and other southern missions. Even in 1702 a few probably
remained under the Spanish government until their kinsmen shifted
their allegiance once more in 1715. The only specific reference to
this second outbreak that has come to my attention is contained in
a letter written from London, about 1715, by Juan de Ayala, who
Says:

In the year 1702 the native Indians of all the provinces of San Agustin, who since
its discovery had been converted to the Catholic faith, and maintained as subjects of
his Majesty, revolted, and, forsaking that religion, sought the protection of the Eng-
lish of Carolina, with whom they have remained ever since, continually harassing the
Catholic Indians.!

This revolt was due, in part, to compulsion exercised by the English
and their allies, in part it was an unavoidable ‘‘taking to the woods,”
through the failure of the Spaniards to protect their proteges, and
in part it came from the prestige which success brought the vic-
torious English. The underlying cause was the unwillingness on the
part of the Spaniards to allow their Indians the use of firearms and a
niggardly home policy, which left Florida insufficiently defended. It
is doubtful how far the Timucua tribes engaged in this secession.
At any rate they did not go in such numbers as to attract the atten-
tion of the English. The Apalachee and the people of Guale re-
mained distinct. The fortunes of those Guale Indians who remained
in Florida from the time of the rebellion until they were rejoined by
their kinsmen who had gone to Carolina will be considered when
we come to speak of the Timucua, probably constituting the largest
portion of the Indians who were true to Spain.

From this time on the name Guale practically disappears, and the
people who formerly bore it are almost invariably known as Yamasee.
It has been thought by recent investigators that the people of Guale
and the Yamasee were identical, but facts contained in the Spanish
archives show that this is incorrect. They make it plain that the
Yamasee were an independent tribe from very early times, belonging,
as Barcia states, to the province of Guale, or perhaps rather to its
outskirts, but not originally a dominant tribe of the province. It
was only in later years that by taking the lead among the hostile
Indians their name came to supersede that of Guale and of every
band of Guale Indians. They are not mentioned frequently until
late, and it is only by piecing together bits of information from
various quarters that we can get any idea of their history.

1 Brooks, MSS.

re SLE

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS — 95

For our first notice we must go back to the very beginning of
Spanish exploration on the Atlantic coast of North America, to the
list of “provinces” for which Francisco of Chicora was responsible.
In this list, as previously noted,' we find one province called “ Yami-
searon,’’ which there is every reason to believe refers to the tribe we
have under discussion. . The peculiar ending suggests a form which
appears again in Yamacraw and which it is difficult to account for
in a tribe supposed to be Muskhogean and without a true phonetic
rin the language. I can explain it only by supposing that it was

originally taken from the speech of the Siouan neighbors of these
people to the northeast.’

April 4, 1540, De Soto’s army came to a province called by Biedma
“the Province of Altapaha.’’ Elvas gives it as ‘“‘the town of Alta-
maca,”’ but Ranjel has the correct form Altamaha. The last men-
tioned speaks as if the Spaniards did not pass through the main
town, but they received messengers from the chief, who furnished
them with food and had them transported across a river. This
was probably the river which Biedma says encouraged them be-
cause it flowed east instead of south. Ranjel seems to imply
that Altamaha, like a neighboring chief called Gamumo, was the
subject of ‘‘a great chief whose name was Ocute”’ (the Hitchiti).*
The significance in this encounter is due to the fact that Altamaha
afterwards appears as the head town of the Lower Yamasee. From
Ranjel’s statement it would seem that the Yamasee were at this
time connected with the Hitchiti, whereas the paieneee of the Guale
people proper was somewhat different.

The next reference comes in a letter dated November 15, 1633,
and is as follows: “The Amacanos Indians have approached the
Province of Apalache and desire missionaries.’’* August 22, 1639,
Gov. Damian de la Vega Castro y Pardo writes that he has made
peace between the Apalachee on one side and the ‘‘Chacatos [Chatot],
Apalachocolos [Lower Creeks], and Amacanos.’’*® These last refer-
ences indicate that while the Yamasee may have been theoretically
in the Province of Guale, they rather belonged to its hinterland and,
as presently appears, were not missionized or affected much by
European influences. In 1670 William Owen speaks of them as
allies of the Spaniards living south of the Cusabo.° They come to
light next in Spanish documents, this time unequivocally, i in a letter
of Gov. Don Pablo de Hita Salazar, dated March 8, 1680. He says:

It has come to the notice of his honor that some Yamasee Indians, infidels (unos
yndios Yamasis ynfieles), who are in the town which was that of San Antonio de
Anacape, have asked for a minister to teach them our holy Catholic faith.’

1 See p. 37. 5 Tbid.; also Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp.
2 But see p. 108. 198-199.
3 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, p. 56; 1, pp. 10, 5 See p. 67.

89-90. 7 Lowery, MSS.

4 Lowery, MSS.

96 : BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

This mission was 20 leagues from St. Augustine, evidently that
called Antonico in the Fresh Water district, and the governor
entrusted these Yamasee at first to the care of Fray Bartholome
de Quifones, Padre and Doctrinero del Pueblo de Maiaca,
which was 16 leagues beyond. These Yamasee explain why the
station of San Antonio is called a “new conversion”? in the mis-
sion list of 1680, although it existed at a very much earlier period
as a Timucua mission.'. The application of the term ‘‘infidels”’ to
them is significant; had they been from the coast district of Guale
they would in all probability have been Christianized by this time.
The name Nombre de Dios de Amacarisse, which also occurs in the
mission list of 1680, indicates still another body of Yamasee in that
old station.!. Fairbanks calls it Macarisqui and speaks of it as the
principal town.? Barcia * spells it Mascarasi and says it was within
600 yards (varas) of St. Augustine, which would agree with the known
situation of Nombre de Dios. The next we hear of them the Yamasee
have taken the lead among those Indians which sought refuge near
the English colony of Carolina and they became so prominent that
the English do not appear to have been aware that any other In-
cians accompanied them.

In a letter to the Spanish monarch, dated London, October 20,
1734, Fray Joseph Ramos Escudero seems to attribute their primacy
to encouragement given the Yamasee by the English and the sup-
ples of clothing and arms with which they provided them.‘

In the copy of this letter made by Miss Brooks the name of the
tribe is consistently spelled Llamapas, but there can be no question
regarding its identity. The original Y has been transposed into a
double / and the old style ss into p. Escudero explains their removal
from the Spanish colony by saying that these Yamasee ‘‘had a grudge
against a certain governor of Florida on account of having ill treated
their chief by words and deeds, because the latter, owing to the
sickness of his superior, had failed one year to send to the city of
St. Augustine, Florida, a certain number of men for the cultivation
of the lands as he was obliged to do.”

Another account of the rebellion is given by Barcia. Referring to
the colony of South Carolina, he says:

Some Indians fled to this province because the English who occupied it had per-
suaded them to give them obedience, instead of to the king; especially the chief of the
Iamacos, a nation which lived in the province of Guale, becoming offended at the
governor, without being placated by the strong persuasions and repeated kindnesses
which the Franciscan missionaries showed to him in the year 1684, for despising all

1 Lowery, MSS.

2G. R. Fairbanks, Hist. of St. Augustine, p. 125. The name of this town helps explain the later
““Yamacraw.”’ (See p. 108.)

8 Barcia, La Florida, p. 240.

‘ Brooks, MSS.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 97

he withdrew to his country and afterwards gave obedience to the English settled in
Santa Elena and San Jorge, other Indians following him; and not satisfied with this
lapse of faith, he returned the following year to the province of Timuqua or Timagoa
to make war, plundered the Doctrina of Santa Catalina, carried off the furnishings
of the church and convent of San Francisco, burned the town, inflicted grievous
death on many Indians, and carried back other prisoners to Santa Elena, where he
made slaves of them, which invasion was so unexpected that it could not be foreseen
nor prevented .. .!

Early South Carolina documents speak of 10 Yamasee towns
there, 5 upper towns headed by Pocotaligo, and 5 lower towns
headed by Altamahaw or Aratomahaw.? The new settlers were
given astrip of land back of Port Royal on the northeast side of
the Savannah River, which, long after they had vacated it, was
still known as ‘the Indian land.’”’ The following names of chiefs or
“kings’’ are given in the South Carolina documents and these evi-
dently refer to their towns: The Pocotalligo king, the Altamahaw
king, the Yewhaw king, the Huspaw king, the Chasee king, the
Pocolabo king, the Ilcombe king, and the Dawfuskee king,’ though
the identity of this last is a little uncertain. The “ Peterba king”’
mentioned among those killed in the Tuscarora war in 1712 was also
probably a Yamasee, though he may have been an Apalachee. There
were 87 Yamasee among Col. Barnwell’s Indian allies in the Tusca-
rora expedition.

In 1715 the Yamasee war broke out, the most disastrous of all
those which the two Carolina settlements had to face. The
documents of South Carolina show clearly that the immediate cause
of this uprising was the misconduct of some English traders, but it
is evident that the enslavement.of Indians, carried on by Carolina
traders in an ever more open and unscrupulous manner, was bound
to produce such an explosion sooner or later. The best contemporary
narratives of this revolt are to be found in “ An Account of Mission-
aries Sent to South Carolina, the Places to Which They Were Ap-
pointed, Their Labours and Success, etc.,’’ and in ‘‘An Account of
the Breaking Out of the Yamassee War, in South Carolina, extracted
from the Boston News, of the 13th of June, 1715,’ both contained in
Carroll’s Historical Collections of South Carolina.’ The following
is from the first of these documents:

In the year 1715, the Indians adjoining to this colony, all round from the borders of
Fort St. Augistino to Cape Fear, had formed a conspiracy to extirpate the white people.
This war broke out the week before Easter [actually on April 15]. The parish of St.
Helen’s had some apprehensions of a rising among the adjoining Indians, called the
Yammosees. On Wednesday before Easter, Captain Nairn, agent among the Indians,

1 Barcia, La Florida, p. 287.

2 Proc. Board dealing with Indian Trade, MS., pp. 46 and 47.

3 Tbid., pp. 55, 58, 81, 102; Council Records, MS., v1, p. 159; vl, p. 186; x, p. 177.
4S. Car. Hist. and Gen. Mag., 9, pp. 30-31.

* Vol. I, pp. 538-576.

148061 °—22 T

98 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

went, with some others, to them [and it appears by direct commission of Governor
Craven who had rumors of trouble], desiring to know the reason of their uneasiness,
that if any injury had been done them, they might have satisfaction made them. The
Indians pretended to be well content, and not to have any designs against the English.
Mr. Nairn therefore and the other traders continued in the Pocotaligat-Town, one of
the chief of the Yammosee nations. At night they went to sleep in the round-house,,
with the King and chief War-Captains, in seeming perfect friendship; but next morn-
ing, at break of day, they were all killed with a volley of shot, excepting one man
and a boy, who providentially escaped (the man much wounded) to Port-Royal, and
gave notice of the rising of the Indians to the inhabitants of St. Helen’s. Upon this
short warning, a ship happening to be in the river, a great number of the inhabitants,
about 300 souls, made their escape on board her to Charles-Town, and among the rest,
Mr. Guy, the society’s missionary; having abandoned all their effects to the savages:
some few families fell into their hands, who were barbarously tortured and murdered.

The Indians had divided themselves into two parties; one fell upon Port-Royal,
the other upon St. Bartholomew’s parish; about 100 Christians fell into their hands,
the rest fled, among which [was] the Reverend Mr. Osborn, the society’s missionary
there. The womenand children, with some of the best of their effects, were conveyed
to Charles-Town; most of the houses and heavy goods in the parish were burnt or
spoil’d. The Yammosees gave the first stroke in this war, but were presently joined
by the Appellachee Indians.!_ On the north side of the province, the English had at
first, some hopes in the faithfulness of the Calabaws [Catawbas] and Creek Indians, but
they soon after declared for the Yammosees.

Upon news of this rising, the governor (the Honourable Charles Craven, Esq.),
with all expedition, raised the forces in Colleton county, and with what assistance
more could be got presently, put himself at their head, and marched directly to the
Indians, and the week afer Easter came up with them and attacked them at the head
of the river Cambahee; and after a sharp engagement put them to flight, and stopped
all farther incursions on that side. ?

The narrative in the Boston News is as follows:

On Tuesday last arrived here His Majesty’s ship Success, Captain Meade, Com-
mander, about 12 days’ passage from South Carolina, by whom his excellency, our
Governor, had a letter from the Honourable Gov. Craven, of South Carolina, acquaint-
ing him that all their Indians, made up of many various Nations, consisting of between
1000 to 1200 men, (lately paid obedience to that Government) had shaken off their
fidelity, treacherously murdering many of His Majesty’s subjects.

Gov. Craven hearing of this rupture, immediately despatched Captain Nairn and
Mr. John Cockran, gentlemen well acquainted with the Indians, to know the cause
of their discontent, who accordingly on the 15th of April, met the principal part of
them at the Yamassee Town, about 130 miles from Charlestown, and after several
debates, pro and con, the Indians seemed very ready to come to a good agreement and
reconciliation, and having prepared a good supper for our Messengers, all went quietly
torest; but early next morning their lodging was beset with a great number of Indians,
who barbarously murdered Captain Nairn and Messieurs John Wright, and Thomas
Ruffly, Mr. Cockran and his wife they kept prisoners, whom they afterwards slew.
One Seaman Burroughs, a strong robust man, seeing the Indians’ cruel barbarity on
the other gentlemen, made his way good through the middle of the enemy, they
pursuing and firing many shot at him. One took him through the cheek (which is
since cured) and coming to a river, he swam through, and alarmed the plantations;
so that by his escape, and a merchantman that lay in Port Royal River, that fired
some great guns on the Enemy, several Hundreds of English lives were saved.

1 That part of the Apalachee settled near Augusta by Governor Moore ir. 1703. See p. 124.
3 Carroll, op. cit., pp. 548-549,

SWANTON | EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK; INDIANS 99

At the same time that Governour Craven despatched Captain Nairn and Mr. Cockran
to make enquiry of the rupture between us and the Indians, he got himself a party
of horse, and being accompanied with several gentlemen volunteers, intended for
the Yamassee Town, in order to have an impartial account of their complaints and
grievances, to redress the same, and to rectify any misunderstanding or disorders

_that might have happened. And on his journey meeting with certain information
of the above Murder, and the Rebellion of the Enemy, he got as many men ready as
could be got, to the Number of about Two HUNDRED AND Forty, designing to march
to the Enemies’ Head Quarters, and engage them.

At the same time the Governour despatched a Courier to Colonel Mackay, with
orders forthwith to raise what forces he could, to go by water and meet him at Yamas-
see Town. The Governour marched within stxTEEN miles of said town, and en-
camped at night in a large Savanna or Plain, by a Wood-side, and was early next
morning by break of day saluted with a volley of shot from about FIVE HUNDRED of
the enemy; that lay ambuscaded in the Woods, who notwithstanding of the surprise,
soon put his men in order, and engaged them so gallantly three quarters of an hour,
that he soon routed the enemy; killed and wounded several of them; among whom
some of their chief Commanders fell, with the loss on our side of several men wounded,
and only John Snow, sentinel, killed. The Governour seeing the great numbers of tite
enemy, and wanting pilots to guide him over the river, and then having vast woods
and swamps to pass through, thought best to return back.

Captain Mackay, in pursuit of his orders, gathered what force he could, and em-
barked by water, and landing marched to the Indian Yamassee town; and though
he was disappointed in meeting the Governour there, yet he surprised and attacked
the enemy, and routed them out of their town, where he got vast quantities of provi-
sion that they stored up, and what plunder they had taken from the English. Colonel
Mackay kept possession of the Town; and soon after hearing that the enemy had got
into another fort, where were upwards of 200 Men, he detached out of his Camp about
140 Men, to attack it and engaged them. At which time a young Strippling, named
Palmer, with about stxrEEN Men, who had been out upon a Scout, came to Colonel
Mackay’s assistance, who, at once, with his men, scaled their walls, and attacked
them in their trenches, killed several, but meeting with so warm a reception from the
enemy that he was necessitated to make his retreat; yet on a second re-entry with
men, he so manfully engaged the enemy as to make them fly their fort. Colonel
Mackay being without, engaged them on their flight, where he slew many of them.
He has since had many skirmishes with them.

The Governour has placed garrisons in all convenient places that may be, in order
to defend the country from depredations and incursions of the enemy, till better can
be made. We had about a hundred traders among the Indians, whereof we appre-
hend they have murdered and destroyed about NriveTy Men, and about rorry more
Men we have lost in several skirmishes. !

Meanwhile the Indians to the north of the colony had not been
idle, and the missionary account already quoted has the following
regarding their activities:

In the mean time, on the northern side, the savages made an inroad as far as the
plantation of Mr. John Herne, distant 30 miles from Goosecreek; and treacherously
killed that gentleman, after he had (upon their pretending peace) presented them
with provisions. Upon news of this disaster, a worthy gentleman, Captain Thomas
Barker, was sent thither with 90 men on horseback; but by the treachery of an Indian
whom he trusted, fell into an ambuscade, in some thick woods, which they must
necessarily pass. The Indians fired upon them from behind trees and bushes. The

1 Carroll, on. cit., pp. 570-572.

100 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

English dismounted, and attacked the savages, and repulsed them; but having lost
their brave commanding officer, Mr. Barker, and being themselves in some disorder,
made their retreat.

Upon this advantage, the Indians came farther on toward Goosecreek, at news of
which, the whole parish of Goosecreek became deserted, except two fortified planta-
tions: and the Reverend Dr. Le Jeau, the society’s missionary there, fled to Charles-
Town.

These northern Indians, being a body of near 400 men, after attacking a small fort in
vain, made proposals of peace, which the garrison unwarily hearkening to, admitted
several of them into the fort, which they surprised and cut to pieces the garrison,
consisting of 70 white people and 40 blacks; a very few escaped. After this they
advanced farther, but on the 13th of June, Mr. Chicken, the Captain of the Goosecreek
Company, met and attacked them, and after a long action, defeated them, and secured
the province on that side from farther ravages.’

The northern hostiles probably consisted principally of the Indians
of the small Siouan tribes, the Cheraw in particular having been long
at odds with the settlers.

In a letter to the Spanish king, already quoted, the monk Escudero
says regarding this war:

About seventeen or eighteen years ago the said Indians Llamapas [ Yamassas], while
being settled at their towns, living quietly and feared by all around these provinces,
four English Captains with a body of soldiers descended upon the towns of the said
Llamapas, and wanted to count the number of Indians that each town contained.
Which upon being noticed by the said Indians they judged that the object of the
English was to make slaves of them and one night they revolted against the English,
and after having killed them all, captains and soldiers, they went to other English
settlements and killed everyone of them, sparing only the women that could be of
service to them and the negroes to sell to the Spaniards. Their fury and cruelty was
such that they did not even spare the children.”

Escudero then passes over the specific events of the war and refers
to the removal of the Yamasee to Florida and the reception given
them. He is not accurate in all of his statements by any means,
but it is interesting to note that a census of all of the Indian tribes,
including among them the Yamasee, was actually made a few months
before the outbreak. It is to be feared, from the general conduct
of the settlers of our Southern States toward the Indians during that
period, that their inference from this was only too well justified.

This grand conspiracy of Indian tribes has never been given
enough attention by our historians. It was a movement of the same
order as the conspiracies of Opechancanough in Virginia, King
Philip in New England, the Natchez in Louisiana, and, although
on a smaller scale, of Pontiac and Tecumseh, individualism’s tribute
to cooperation in time of adversity, inspired by a broader insight
into the movement of events for the time being, and failing because
the unifying tendency is too late, the individualistic instinct too
normal and too deep-seated. From what we learn of this particular
uprising, from both French and English sources, we know that it

1 Carroll, op. cit., pp. 549-550. 2 Brooks, MSS.

SWANTON] ‘BARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 101

was the result of a conspiracy shared by the Creeks, the Choctaw,
the Catawba and other Siouan tribes, and probably by the Cherokee.
Apparently the only exceptions were the Chickasaw and a few small
bands of Indians within the colony of South Carolina itself. Fortu-
nately the greater tribes were at a distance and rested satisfied when
they had killed the traders among them and plundered their stores.
Fortunately too, the governor of South Carolina and his subordinates
acted with promptness and complete success. The Yamasee were
handled so severely that they left the country and settled for the most
part in Florida, whither their women and children had preceded them.
The Indians attacking from the north, probably small tribes only, were
driven back. This removed the first line of Indian attack on the
colony in short order, and either the more remote hostiles must be
prepared to bear the brunt of the fighting if the original project was
to be carried out or they must get out of danger. It was one thing
to take the part of passive conspirators behind the backs of the Yama-
see, but quite another to be the principal performers, especially after
the impressive and rapid manner in which their allies had been routed.
As a result the more distant tribes immediately quieted down. The
Catawba ever after remained staunch friends of the colonists, and the
Cherokee resumed peaceful relations with them. To secure them-
selves against possible reprisals many of the other tribes moved
farther from the borders of Carolina, the Apalachee, Oconee, Apalach-
icola, and part of the Yuchi and Savannah falling back to the Ocmul-
gee and thence to the Chattahoochee, while the great body of Lower
Creeks, who were then living on the Ocmulgee and its branches, also
fell back to the Chattahoochee, some of them, apparently, removing
as far as the Tallapoosa. Aside from its immediate effects on the
colony of South Carolina the Yamasee war is thus of great importance
in tracing the history of the Indian tribes of the Southeast, marking
as it does a great step in their progressive decline and fall.

From what Escudero says it may be inferred that another cause of
the lukewarmness of the Creeks was jealousy of the Yamasee, and,
as we shall see when we come to consider the part played in this dis-
turbance by the Apalachee, there was an English as well as a Spanish
faction in the Creek Nation. ‘The former apparently obtained control
shortly after the beginning of the war.

The part played by the Spaniards in all this was perhaps nothing
more than that of passive sympathizers. They may or may not have
been aware that a massacre was coming when they received the
women and children of the Yamasee, for it was a natural measure of
precaution preceding the change of allegiance. Some light is thrown
on the events of the time by Juan de Ayala’s letter to the Spanish
ambassador. He says:

The Governor and Captain General of these provinces [of Florida] at that time
reported to H. M. that on the 27th of May of last year [1715?], there had appeared

102 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

before him, four Indian Caciques of the revolted towns [i. e., those which had pre-
viously revolted from the Spaniards], soliciting pardon and permission to return under
the dominion of H. M., and to become his subjects, representing one hundred and
sixty of their towns [!!]. And that the Governor had granted them pardon in the
name of H. M., designating to them the territory they should occupy in order that they
might resume the cultivation of their lands in peace and quietness, as they had lived
before. !

Of their reception in Florida after they had been driven from
Carolina, Escudero says:

They came to the provinces of Florida occupied by us, asking to be admitted into the
service of our King, which was granted them by that Governor, amidst great rejoic-
ing by the people of that city [S¢. Augustine]. They founded their towns at a dis-
tance of ten and twelve leagues from the said city and were maintained by Y. E. that
first year with an abundance of everything, and afterwards by allowing them what-
ever they asked for to the present day [1734].!

Escudero thus sketches the history of these returned Yamasee
during the first few years:

Of these Indians, seven or eight of their caciques, not having sufficient confidence
in the Spaniards, remained in the depopulated province of Apalache, about a hundred
and fifty leagues from St. Augustine, but having heard of the good reception and kind
treatment that their companions had received from the Spaniards, asked the governor
to send to their towns a few missionary fathers, as they desired to become Christians
and subjects of our king.

Missionaries were asked from Spain, ang about thirteen years ago, twelve of them
were sent to that province of Florida. Upon their arrival in St. Augustine, I was
selected, together with ten other clergymen, for that mission. I remained among
them, in those deserts, during three years, at which time they had all become Chris-
tians.

Just then the Vehipes? [Creek] Indians, instigated by the English, came down
upon us, but after the loss of some men, I succeeded with my Indians in withdrawing
from those woods and falling back upon St. Augustine, where we joined the other
Indians of the same nation, so that united we could resist the attacks of the enemy.
We formed our towns in that province of Florida, but about seven or eight years ago
the enemy again hunted us up and killed many Indians.?

A few Yamasee may have gone to live with their northern allies,
since Adair mentions their language as one of those spoken in the
Catawba confederacy in 1743.4. Just after the Yamasee war we also
hear of Yamasee on “‘Sapola River,’® but we do not know whether
this settlement was one of long standing or whether it was a position
occupied by some of these people during their retreat to Florida. At
any rate, all of those who continued in the Spanish interest were
soon united near St. Augustine. Immediately after their removal
the English colonists learned that the Huspaw king, a Yamasee
chief, had been made general in chief by the Spaniards over 500

1 Brooks, MSS.

2 Probably misread from Ochisses.

3 Brooks, MSS. The attack referred to in the last sentence must have been that by Palmer, detailed
farther on.

4 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 225.

5 Pub. Rec. S. C., MS., vi, p. 119.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS LOS

Indians who were to be sent against Carolina.’ In 1719 a captive
taken by the English testified that there were 60 Yamasee near St.
Augustine.? In 1722 it is said that they were expelled from St.
Augustine because they would not work in the way the Spaniards
wished.

From Tobias Fitch’s journal we learn that the head chief of the
Lower Creeks, whom he calls “Olid Brinins,”’ “Old Brunins,”’ or
“Old Brmins,”’ sent an expedition against the Yamasee in Florida
in 1725. While Fitch was stul with him two runners came back
and gave the following account of this expedition:

The Pilot that we had, Carried us to a Fortin a Town Where we thought the Yamases
were, and we fired at the Said Fort, Which alarmed ten Men that was Placed To
Discover us which we past when they were asleep. Our fireing awaked them and
they Ran round us and gave Notice to the Yamasees Who was Removed from this
town Nigher the Sea and had there Build a new fort which we found and Attacked
but with litle Success through it happen’d the Huspaw Kings Family was not all got
in the fort and we took three of them and fired Several Shott at the Huspaw king and
are in hopes have killed him. There Came out a party of the Yamases who fought
us and we took the Capt. We waited three days about there Fort, Expecting to get
ane oppertunity to take Some More but to no purpose. We then Came away and the
Yamases pursued us. We fought them and gained the Batle. We drove the Yamases
unto a pond and was Just Runing in after them where we Should a had a great advan-
tage of them but we discover’d about fourty Spanyards armed on horse Back Who
made Toward us wt a White Cloth before them and as they advanced toward us They
made Signes that we Should fforbear fireing. Some of our head men gave Out orders
not to fire, But Steyamasiechie or Gogel Eys Told them it was spoilt and to fire away.
According we did, and the Spanyards fled. After that the Yamases pursued us [and]
gave us ane other Batle in which they did us the most Damnadge. We have killed
Eight of the Yamases, on of which is the huspaw kings head Warriour and have
Brought off all their Scalps. We have likewise Taken nine of them a Live, Together
with Several Guns, Some Cloth, and Some plunder Out of there Churches, Which
you will See When the Warriours Come in.’

Fitch adds that the Creeks lost on their side five men killed and
six wounded.‘ In the ‘‘Introduction to the Report on General Ogle-
thorpe’s Expedition to St. Augustine,’ we read that in 1727—

A Party of Yamasee Indians, headed by Spaniards from St. Augustine, having
murdered our Out-Scouts, made an incursion into our Settlements, within Ten Miles
of Ponpon, where they cut off one Mr. Micheau, with another White-man on the same
plantation, and carried off a Third Prisoner, with all the Slaves, Horses, &c. But
being briskly pursued by the Neighbours, who had Notice of it, they were overtaken,
routed, and obliged to quit their Booty.

The Government [the narrative goes on to say], judged it Necessary to chastise (at
least) those Indians, commissioned Col. Palmer for that Purpose instantly; who with
about One Hundred Whites, and the like Number of our Indians, landed at St. Juan’s,
and having left a sufficient Number to take care of the Craft, marched undiscovered to
the Yamasee Town, within a Mile of St. Augustine. He attack’d it at once, killed
several of those Indians, took several Prisoners, and drove the Rest into the very Gates

1 Pub. Rec. S. C., MS., vu, p. 186.

2 Thid., vit, p. 7.

3 Mereness, Travels in the American Colonies, pp. 204-205.
4 Ibid., p. 205.

104 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

of St. Augustine Castle; where they were sheltered. And having Destroyed their Town,
he returned. -

In the beginning of 1728, a Party of those Yamasees having landed at Daffuskee
surprised one of our Scout-Boats, and killed every Man but Capt. Gilbert, who com-
manded her. One of the Jndians, seizing him as his Property, saved his Life. In
their Return back to St. Augustine a debate arose that it was necessary to kill him, for
that the Governor would not have them to bring any one Alive. But Capt. Gilbert, plead-
ing with the Jndian that claim’d him was protected by him; and upon coming to St.
Augustine was after some Time released by the Governor.!

In a letter dated Habana, August 27, 1728, Gov. Dionisio de la
Vega gives an account of the decline of the Florida missions from the
time of the first English invasions. He states that before the English
raid under Palmer there were four Indian settlements near St.
Augustine, named Nombre de Dios, Tolemato, Palica [probably
Patica], and Carapuyas, but the occupants of these spoke several
different languages and it is impossible to say which were occupied by
Yamasee. Tolemato was, of course, named from the old Guale town,
but in the changes that had taken place there is no certainty that any
of the original population remained. The Patica are referred to by
Bartram as a former Carolina tribe, but again no certain connection
can be established between the name and the later population. Nom-
bre de Dios, or Chiquito as it is also called, was originally a Timucua
settlement and may have remained such in part; but as we have seen,’
it had now received a new name from the Yamasee who constituted
at least the larger part of the population. De la Vega says of the
above mentioned attack:

A body of two hundred English having penetrated into that town on the aforesaid
day, the 20th of March, (1728), together with as many Indians, they plundered and
pillaged it and set the whole town on fire. They robbed the church and the convent
and profaned the images, killing six and wounding eight Indians, a lieutenant and a
soldier of infantry. They also took several prisoners with them and withdrew with-
out further action. In view of this the governor had the church blown up by means
of powder, withdrawing the Indians who had remained there to the shelter of this
city [St. Augustine], leaving only the town of Pocotabaco under the protection of
the guns of this Fort.

It would appear, then, that after this raid the four towns were
reduced to one close to St. Augustine, and the fact that its name
preserves that of the leading upper Yamasee town shows the primacy
of that tribe among the remnants gathered there. This name should
be Pocotalaco; the 7 has been miscopied b. However, the town
certainly embraced several villages, as appears from a number of docu-
ments. One speaks of a Yamasee village called Tachumite exist-
ing about 1734,? and another gives an enumeration, not only of the vil-
lages but the names and ages of the warriors as well. This latter, a
copy of which is in the Ayer collection, is entitled: ‘‘List of Indians
capable of bearing arms divided according to their towns who are

1 Carroll, 8S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1, pp. 355-356. Dela Vega seems to date this attack a year later
(see below).

2 See p. 96.

3 MS. in Ayer Collection, Newberry Library.

SWANTON ]

EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK

at the service of the Presidio of San Agustin

as follows:
PUEBLO DE POTALACA

Afios.
El Cacique Clospo.... 60
El Cacique Antonio... 20
Juan Sanchez.......... . 30
MranCiscOs. =.= 35 cs. 60
i olicohl s Git nee 60
bs So A ala a 60
Asencio Arapa....-.-- 20
Ch ETE 6 ad er 30 |
Francisco el Largo.... 30
Pedro Tusque......-.. 30
Antonio Rimendo.... 30
Bernardo de la Cruz.. 20
Francisco Sarqueno... 30
Maniielece® 2s seers 2 20
Antonio Yinquichate.. 25
Arian OHISltda.22 2. 5 15
Juan. polang..2.-.>+.-.- 20
Francisco Arlana..... - 19
Juan Ygnacio.......-- 35
uamillosse<' 22ers 2 5. 12
antGhe7Z252" 2 has! Sek 12
Antonio Yuta.......... 25
Antonio Benavides.... 14

PUEBLO DE CHIQUITO?

El Cacique Yuta...---
El Cacique Juan San-

CUES Se oe 30
Wastlasquina....... =... 30
Marcos Rendon......-. 30
Juan Gregorio. ......-- 25
Lorenzo Santiago. ..... 25
PRIAORE 3c. Sci ay - 20
Diego de Asuela.....- 65
Antonio Clara........: 16
Luis Santa Fee-...-- 16
Joseph su cufiado...... 12
(32 Ae eS 19
Juan Pasqua..... 25
Miguel...... 60
MEMIBIAL ict pos oS. 25

PUEBLO DE SAN NICOLAS
El Cacique Manuel.... 60
El Cacique Domingo

SSONOL en ac. 32h cee GO
Juan Joseph.........-. 55
AGEROMEMNO 2 22a. 5s =” 20

PUEBLO DE SAN NICOLAS—

de la Florida.’’!

continued

Afios.

Agustin Nicolas... . -- 30
IMmele SI. ae tsk 14
Bennett... twa clack cis, 14
Joseph Antonio... .... 30
BO OTINAT Op ee ore a eet 20
16 Yeva\ (bie: yates ees eee 15

PUEBLO DE TOLOMATO
El Cacique Bernardo.. 40
Donmineore Pe 5.6.5.5. 245
Luis Gabriel......--.. 45
WorenZ02 222th tee 4 20
1/2 1 9°: poe eae pee ee 30
Antonio Cagelate...... 25
Biacamost. 52h 2 Gettin 16
Mariam: ¢:-.3< 225 3324 16
Diego el Mestiro....... 40
MAS DENTRO DEL LUGAR
El Cacique Fuentes... 60
Juan Sanchez.......--. 30
Tomas 25
Arey eee AO, ee eee LY.
PUEBLO DE LA COSTA

El Cacique Costa... - - - 45

TG WISs ees oe He 20
| Juan Sanchez........ a0
2 ne ee a ree)
iduanrJopephi. ..-..02. 30

Lorenzo Nieto......-.- 25

Romuald geese osteo 25
AGitontosssts 1. hoe. 14
SVicentes 22s. 2s. 20

Antonio Puchero.. ... 20

PALICA
El Cacique Lorenzo... 80
El Cacique Juan
PRIM ONM EZ) 5° Syrne a cit 60

OMT Oe 622 Seed. ee = 0

PION coxa ais esas dnge om 2 80

RTO TCHS year eo ee 45

ian Bawtstaes--oos.- ts

borenzo.seoe ee 20
OMA SA VAN asses oe 25

igi >. 62 =e. 2 ee 20

Maniiele 2-625 255 att 12

INDIANS

105
It is

PALICA—continued

Afios.

Jaan Pure. 2222! 14
AE OMBRS bots.) oer. 522/4- 40
OUR eats ye oar th. 11
| Pedro de la Cruz....-- 35
El Cacique Marcos.... 60
Juan Melchor.......... 11
Juan el Apalachino.... 80
Francisco del Maral... 50

LA PUNTA

El Cacique Juan...... 80
rancisee 3s... 70
Pedro del Sastre... ... 60
Antonio el Mison.... - - 35
Francisco Luis... ..-.-- 35
Crisostomo....--.-- =: . 25
Joseph Atase......-... 20
JOSEPH SII AS Eee ee 20
Juan del Costa...... .. 25
Juan Joseph........... 14
DAN CHEZ 9-56 ht s.< Atel 12
Joseph Satagane....... 30
Joseph el Apalachino.. 19
Antonio Cachimbo.... 19
Apubtane eee eset ass) 25
Aronelles5 = $344. 4 60
Juan Casapueva.....-. 50

PUEBLO DE TIMUCUA
“El Cacique Aluca-

CORA ee aes 80
TRASO ne ee ee ners 60
Crisostomosss= sales: 50
Juan Bautista........- 50
Gas panes Se Le. 25
Santiago Baquero..... 40
Juans Alonsosses.- see 20
IBATLOlO Sees eaten ere
Miguel Mototo......-- 60

| Manuel Mototo...-....- 60
Miguel 12
Benitozees weet se 12
AM ONIOL o Ae oe ot coe 12
Jura Claris oye ee SAS 50
DanbAeN eee eo SS 30
Solanwaxesart ss cle st 20
WED IGIS ees SF 25

Total number, 122.°

1.MS. in Ayer Collection, Newberry Library.
2 Also known as Nombre de Dios.
This should be 123 if there is no error in the lists on which it is based.

106 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

So that the eight towns contain in all a hundred and twenty-two men!’ capable of
bearing arms, having in all of women and children two hundred and ninety-five,
which added to the hundred and twenty-two make four hundred and seventeen, the
remains of about thirty thousand which were formerly at the service of Spain within
the jurisdiction of Florida.

This was written November 27, 1736, at Habana. The ‘‘ Pueblo
de Timucua” probably contained the remnants of the Timucua
people, the rest the descendants of the Yamasee proper and the old
people of Guale. Apalachee do not appear to have settled near St.
Augustine in any number, although two individuals in the above
list bear the name of that tribe.

In a letter written at St. Augustine, August 30, 1738, and preserved
among the Spanish Archives of the Indies,’ is an interesting relation of
the adventures of ‘‘ the Indian Juan Ignacio de los Reyes, of the Yguaja
Nation, one of the villages which compose the town of Pocotalaca, in
the neighborhood of this place.’’ This man, under orders from the
governor of Florida, Don Manuel de Montiano, visited the English
posts on Cumberland Island and in St. Andrews and St. Simons Sounds
during the months of July and August, 1738, and brought back val-
uable information regarding their condition and regarding the English
projects with reference to St. Augustine.

Some Yamasee evidently accompanied the Apalachee to Pensacola
and Mobile. Under date of 1714 Barcia notes that the chief of the
Yamasee and some of his people, along with the chief of the Apalachee,
visited the commandant of Pensacola, and we find the legend ‘‘ Yam-
ase Land,’’ on the northeast shore of Pensacola Bay, in Jefferys’
map of Florida which stands opposite the title page of John Bartram’s
Description of East Florida.* From the parish registers of Mobile we
learn of the baptism in 1728 of a ‘‘ Hiamase”’ Indian, Francois, and a
map of 1744 shows, at the mouth of Deer River, near Mobile, a settle-
ment of ‘‘Yamane,’’ the name evidently intended for this tribe.*

Under date of July, 1754, the Colonial Records of Georgia speak of
the Yamasee as still allied with the Spaniards,°® and about the year
1761 we hear of ‘‘a few Yamasees, about 20 men, near St. Augus-
tine.’’®

Meantime, however, they were being} harrassed continually by the
Creek Indians in alliance with the English, and presently some
Creeks began to move into the peninsula and make permanent homes
there. Bartram, who visited Florida in 1777-78, speaks of the
Yamasee Nation as entirely destroyed as a distinct body, and he

1 This should be 123 if there is no error in the lists on which it is based.
2 Serrano y Sanz, Doc, Hist., pp. 260-264.

3 John Bartram, quoted by Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 65,

4 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 113,

® Col. Rec. Ga.,vn, p. 441,

6 Description of South Carolina, p, 63,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 107

thus describes the site on St. Johns River of what he terms ‘‘the
last decisive battle’’:

In the morning I found I had taken up my lodging on the border of an ancient
burying ground, containing sepulchres or tumuli of the Yamasees, who were here
slain by the Creeks in the last decisive battle, the Creeks having driven them into
the point, between the doubling of the river, where few of them escaped the fury of
the conquerors. These graves occupied the whole grove, consisting of two or three
acres of ground. There were nearly thirty of these cemeteries of the dead, nearly of
an equal size and form, being oblong, twenty feet in length, ten or twelve feet in
width, and three or four feet high, now overgrown with orange trees, live oaks, laurel
magnolias, red bays, and other trees and shrubs, composing dark and solemn shades.!

He saw Yamasee slaves living among the Seminole;? but from
other data it is evident that free bands, in whole or in part Yamasee,
still existed. One of these will be mentioned later. Several writers
on the Seminole state that the Oklawaha band was said to be de-
scended from this tribe,’ and it appears probable since that band
occupied the region in which most maps of the period immediately
preceding place the Yamasee. According to the same writers
their complexion was somewhat darker than that of the other Semi-
nole. The noted leader Jumper is said by some to have been of
Yamasee descent,* but Cohen sets him down as a refugee from the
Creeks.° In the long war with the Americans which followed, what-
ever remained of the tribe became fused with one of the larger
bodies, very likely with the Mikasuki, whose language is supposed
to have been nearest to their own. We do not know whether those
Yamasee who went to Pensacola and Mobile with the Apalachee re-
mained with them or returned to east Florida, but the former sup-
position is the more likely.

Another part of the Yamasee evidently settled among the Creeks,
though for our knowledge of this fact we are almost entirely depend-
ent upon maps. The late Mr. H.S. Halbert was the first to call my
attention to the evidence pointing to such a conclusion. On the
Covens and Mortier map compiled shortly after the Yamasee war
the name appears in the form ‘‘Asassi’”’ among the Upper Creeks.
An anonymous French writer, of the middle of the eighteenth cen-
tury or earlier, adds to his enumeration of the Creek villages this
statement:

There are besides, ten leagues from this last village [a Sawokli town], two villages
of the iamasé nation where there may be a hundred men, but this nation is attached
to the Spaniards of St. Augustine.®

On the Mitchell map of 1755 we find ‘‘Massi,” probably intended
for the same tribe, placed on the southeast bank of the Tallapoosa
River between Tukabahchee and Holiwahali.’? The name appears also

1 Bartram, Travels, p. 137. 5 Cohen, Notices of Florida, p. 237.

2 Tbid., pp. 183-184, 390. 6 MS., Ayer Lib.
3 See Cohen, Notices of Florida, p. 33. 7 See plate 6.

4 Williams, Terr. of Florida, p. 272, 1837.

108 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

on several later maps, such as those of Evans, 1771, and D’Anville,
1790, but it was probably copied into them from Mitchell. Without
giving any authority Gatschet quotes a statement to the effect
“that the Yemasi band of Creeks refused to fight in the British-
American war of 1813.”

There is reason to think that this band subsequently moved down
among the Lower Creeks and thence into Florida. Into his report of
1822 Morse copies a list of ‘“‘Seminole’”’ bands from the manuscript
journal of a certain Captain Young, and among these we find the
‘‘Kmusas,”’ consisting of only 20 men and located 8 miles above
the Florida boundary.?. Their name is probably preserved in that
of Omusee Creek, in Henry and Houston Counties, Alabama. What
is evidently the same band appears again in a list of Seminole towns
made in 1823, where it has the more correct form ‘‘ Yumersee.”’
They had then moved into Florida and were located at the ‘‘head
of the Sumulga Hatchee River, 20 miles north of St. Mark’s.”” The
chief man was ‘‘Alac Hajo,’”’ whose name is Creek, properly Ahalak
hadjo, ‘‘ Potato hadjo.”* It may be surmised that these people
were subsequently absorbed into the Mikasuki band of Seminole.

Connected intimately with the Yamasee were a small tribe found
on the site of what is now Savannah by Governor Oglethorpe in
1733, when he founded the colony of Georgia. They are called
Yamacraw by the historians of the period, and their town was on a
bluff, which still bears their name, in what is now the western suburb
of the city. This name is a puzzle, since no r occurs in the Muskho-
gean tongues. It suggests Yamiscaron, the form in which the
tribal name of the Yamasee first appears in history through Fran-
cisco of Chicora, but as I have shown elsewhere there is every reason
to believe that the ending -ron is Siouan.* Its first definite appearance
is In the later (1680) name of the Florida mission Nombre de Dios
de Amacarisse, also given as Macarisqui or Macarizqui. We may
safely assume that the leaders of the later Georgia Yamacraw came
from this place, but the name itself remains as much of a mystery
as before. They seem to be mentioned in the Public Records of
South Carolina a few years before the Yamasee war as the ‘“Amecario,”
or ‘‘Amercaraio,” ‘‘above Westoe [i. e., Savannah] River.”> From
the conference which Oglethorpe held with these people and the
Creeks and the speeches delivered at that conference we obtain
some further information regarding the history of the town. It
was settled in 1730 by a body of Indians from among the Lower
Creeks, numbering 17 or 18 families and 30 or 40 men, under the

1 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 65. 4 See p. 37 et seq.
2 Morse, Rept. on Indian Affairs, p. 364; see p. 409. 5 Pub. Rec. 8S. C., 0, pp. 8-9, MS.
3 Amer. State Papers, Ind. Affairs, 0, p. 439; see p. 411.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 109

leadership of a chief named Tomochichi. These are said to have
been banished from their own country for some crimes and misde-
meanors. Tomochichi himself had ‘‘tarried for a season with the
Palla-Chucolas”’ before settling there, and it must be remembered
that before the Yamasee war the Apalachicola tribe had been located
upon Savannah River some 50 miles higher up. It is therefore
likely that he belonged to some refugee Yamasee among the Apala-
chicola, and his occasion for settling in this place may have been as
much because it was the land of his ancestors as because he had been
‘outlawed.’ Indeed he says as much in his speech to Oglethorpe.
In 1732 the Yamacraw asked permission of the government of
South Carolina to remain in their new settlement and it was accorded
them. When Oglethorpe arrived they are said to have been the only
tribe for50 miles around. Theyreceived the settlers in afriendly man-
ner and acted as intermediaries between them and the Creeks. From
the negotiations then undertaken it would seem that both the Yama-
craw and the Yamasee were reckoned as former members of the Creek
confederacy. At least the confederacy arrogated to itself at that
time the right to dispose of their lands, all of which, except the site
of Yamacraw, a strip of land between Pipemakers Bluff and Pally-
Chuckola Creek, and the three islands, Ossabaw, Sapello, and St.
Catherines, were ceded to Oglethorpe. Tomochichi, his wife, nephew,
and a few of his warriors went to England in 1734, where they
received much attention. A painting.of Tomochichi and his nephew,
Tonahowi, was made by Verelst, and from this engravings were
afterwards made by Faber and Kleinschmidt.1| Tomochichi died
October 5, 1739,? and the Yamacraw population declined rather
than increased. After a time they moved to another situation later
known as New Yamacraw,’? but ultimately those that were left
probably retired among their kindred in the Creek Nation, and we
may conjecture that they united with the Creek band of Yamasee
mentioned above.

The Yamasee made a considerable impression on Creek imagina-
tion and are still remembered by a few of the older Creek Indians.
According to one of my informants, a Hitchiti, they lived north of
the Creeks, which was in any sense true of them only when they
were located in South Carolina. It was from this tribe, according
to the same informant, that many of the Creek charms known as
sabia came.

THE APALACHEE

The third Muskhogean group to be considered is known to history
under the name Apalachee, a word which in Hitchiti, a related
dialect, seems to signify ‘‘on the other side.’ The Apalachee proper

1 See Jones, Hist. Sketch of Tomo-chi-chi;; Tailfer, A true and hist. narr. of the colony of Georgia.
2 Jones, Ibid., p. 121.
8Tailfer, op. cit., p. 74.

110 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 73

occupied, when first discovered, a portion of what is now western
Florida, between Ocilla River on the east and the Ocklocknee and
its branches on the west. They probably extended into what is now
the. State of Georgia for a short distance, but their center was in
the region indicated, northward of Apalachee Bay. Tallahassee,
the present State capital of Florida, is nearly in the center of their
ancient domain.

A fair idea of the number and names of their towns may be obtained
from the lists of missions made in the years 1655! and 1680.2. The
first of these contains the following Apalachee missions, together
with their distances in leagues from St. Augustine:

San Lorenzo de Apalache.......... 75 | San Pedro y San Pablo de Kpal

San Francisco de Apalache. ........ vi) [Kpal evidently for Apal]......... 87
La Concepcién de Apalache........ 77 | San Cosme y San Damiaén.......... 90
San Josef de Apalache...-........- 84) ‘San ois de Apalaches. 2... secre 88
San Juan de Apalache..........-..- 86 | San Martin de Apalache........... 87

Fortunately the second list gives native names also. In this the
missions are classified by provinces, but no distances appear. The
following are enumerated in the ‘‘Provincia de Apalache,” the order
having been altered to agree as far as possible with that in the first
mission list:

San Lorenco de Ybithachucu.

Nuestra Senora de La Purissima Con¢epgidn de Ajubah.

San Fran¢isco de Oconi.

San Joseph de Ocuia.

San Joan de Ospalaga.

San Pedro y San Pablo de Patali.

San Antonio de Bacuqua.

San Cosme y San Damian de Yecambi.

San Carlos de los Chacatos, conversion nueva.

San Luis de Talimal.

Nuestra Sefora de la Candelaria de la-Tama, conversion nueva.

San Pedro de los Chines, conversion nueva.

San Martin de Tomoli.

Santa Cruz y San Pedro de Alcantara de Ychutafun,

There is little doubt that the missions of this second list correspond-
ing with those of the former are pure Apalachee—1. e., the first six, the
eighth, the tenth, and the thirteenth. The omission of the name Apa-
lachee after San Cosme and San Damian in the first is probably due to
lack of space in the original text. After the preceding name it is abbre-
viated. San Antonio de Bacuqua was also in all probability Apalachee,
a town missionized later than the others. San Carlos de los Chacatos
was of course the mission among the neighboring Chatot Indians, and

1 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 132-133; also Lowery, MSS., Lib. Cong. Reproduced on p. 323.
2 Lowery, MSS. Reproduced on p. 323.

SWANTON ] KARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS Pid

Nuestra Sefiora de la Candelaria de la Tama that among the Tama
or Tamali. The Chines appear to have been another foreign tribe,
though, like the rest, of Muskhogean origin. There are few references
to them. The last mission on the list, Santa Cruz y San Pedro de
Alcantara de Ychutafun, seems from other evidence to have been
located in a true Apalachee town established in later times on the
banks of the Apalachicola River and thus to the westward of the
original Apalachee country. Since tafa was a name for ‘‘town”
peculiar to the Apalachee dialect, of which tafun would be the objec-
tive form, and ichu, itcw, or itco a common Muskhogean word for
‘‘deer,’’ it is probable that the native name signifies ‘‘ Deer town.”’
The settlement may have been made at this place because deer were
plentiful there.

In addition to the above we have notice in two or three places of
a mission called Santa Maria. The Van Loon map of 1705 has a
legend stating that this mission had been destroyed by the Alabama
in the year in which the map was published. About the same time
(1702) we hear of a town called Santa Fe.t. In 1677 there existed a
mission called San Damian de Cupayca. The town is mentioned in
a letter of 1639.2, San Marcos belongs to a later period.

We have, besides, the native names of some towns not identified
with the mission stations. They are Iniahica, Calahuchi, Uzela,
Ochete, Aute, Yapalaga, Bacica, Talpatqui, Capola, and Ilcombe.
The first four appear only in the De Soto narratives. Iniahica is
spelled Iviahica by Ranjel, Iniahico by Biedma, and is given as
Anhayea Apalache by Elvas* It can not be identified in later
documents and the name may bein Timucua. Calahuchi is mentioned
by Ranjel* and Uzela by Elvas.5 Ochete is located by Elvas 8
leagues south of Iniahica.* Aute was a town visited by Narvaez, eight
or nine days journey south, or probably rather southwest, of the main
Apalachee towns.® Garcilasso gives this appellation to the town of
Ochete, but the distance of the latter from the main Apalachee
towns does not at all agree with that given for the Aute of Narvaez.
Yapalaga is entered on most of the more detailed maps of the eight-
eenth century. Bacica, as well as Bacuqua, already given in the
mission lists, seems to have been somewhat removed from the other
Apalachee towns, yet probably belonged to them. Its name is per-
petuated in Wacissa River and town. Talpatqui appears in the
Apalachee letter of 1688.7 Possibly it was identical with Talimal
and therefore with San Luis. Capola and Ilcombe appear as Apa-
lachee towns on the Popple map of 1733 (pl. 4). As the first of

1See p. 120. 5 Tbid., I, p. 47.
2 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 200, 208. 6 Bandelier, Journey of Cabeza de Vaca, p. 29.
3 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 47; 0, pp. 7, 79. 7 Buckingham Smith, Two Docs.

4Ibid., 1, p. 79.

112 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

these resembles Sapello and the second is given in South Carolina
documents as the name of a Yamasee chief, ‘‘the Ilcombe king,’’! it is
probable that they had moved from the Guale coast in later times.
The Apalachee town of Oconi, although missionized as early as 1655,
may also have been an adopted town, part of the Oconee tribe to be
mentioned later. A town called Machaba, which is located on many
maps not far from the Apalachee settlements, was really Timucua.
Although perhaps not as prominent toward the close of Apalachee
history as San Luis de Talimali Ibitachuco, the San Lorengo de
Ybithachucu of the missionaries, has the longest traceable history.
It appears as far back as the De Soto narratives in the forms Ivit-
achuco, Uitachuco, and Vitachuco, although Garcilasso, our authority
for the last form, bestows it upon a Timucua chief instead of an
Apalachee town.?. Ina letter of 1677 it appears as Huistachuco,* in
the mission list above given Ybithachuco, and in the Apalachee letter
written to Charles II in 1688 Ybitachuco.t Finally, Colonel Moore,
who destroyed it, writes the name Ibitachka.® Ajubali is noted more
often under the forms Ayaville or Ayubale.

Very little has been preserved regarding the ethnology of the
Apalachee. Their culture was midway between that of the Florida
tribes and their own Muskhogean relatives to the north. Writing
in 1673 one of the governors of Florida says of their dress:

The men wear only bark and skin clothing and the women small cloaks (goaipiles),
which they make of the roots of trees.

These last must have been similar to, if not identical with, the
mulberry bark garments. From what the De Soto chroniclers say
of the change in domestic architecture which they encountered in
south-central Georgia it is evident that the Apalachee were asso-
ciated in this feature rather with the southern than with the north-
ern tribes.

Fontaneda makes a few brief remarks regarding the customs of the
Apalachee,® but it is secondhand information obtained through the
south Florida Indians and of little value.

The first historical reference to the Apalachee is in Cabeza de
Vaca’s narrative of the Narvaez expedition. On their way north
through the central part of the Florida Peninsula in the spring of
1528 the explorers met some Indians who led them to their village,
and ‘there,’ says Cabeza de Vaca, ““we found many boxes for mer-
chandize from Castilla. In every one of them was a corpse covered
with painted deer hides. The commissary thought this to be some

1 See p. 97.

2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, p. 47; 0, pp. 7, 79; Shipp’s Garcilasso, p. 283.
3 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 207.

4 Buckingham Smith, Two Docs.

> See p. 121.

6 Buckingham Smith, Letter of De Soto and Mem. of Fontaneda, pp. 27-28.

ee ee ee ee ee Ee

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 1138

idolatrous practice, so he burnt the boxes with the corpses. We
also found pieces of linen and cloth, and feather headdresses that
seemed to be from New Spain, and samples of gold.”’

The narrative continues as follows:

We inquired of the Indians (by signs) whence they had obtained these things and
they gave us to understand that very far from there, was a province called Apalachen,
in which there was much gold. They also signified to us that in that province we
would find everything we held in esteem. They said that in Apalachen there was
plenty.!

The form “Apalachen”’ here given seems to contain the Muskho-
gean objective ending —n, which by a stranger would often be taken
over as a necessary part of the word. The people among whom the
Spaniards then were, were Timucua, therefore the mistake was
perhaps on the part of the Indians, but more likely it is the form as
heard by the Spaniards afterwards from the Apalachee themselves.
The Spaniards continued their journey in search of this province and
“came in sight of Apalachen without having been noticed by the
Indians of the land”’ on the day after St. John’s Day?

Cabeza continues thus:

Once in sight of Apalachen, the governor commanded me to enter the village with
nine horsemen and fifty foot. So the inspector and I undertook this. Upon penetrat-
ing into the village we found only women and boys. The men were not there at the
time, but soon, while we were walking about they came and began to fight, shooting
arrows at us. They killed the inspector’s horse, but finally fled and left us. We
found there plenty of ripe maize ready to be gathered and much dry corn already
housed. We also found many deer skins and among them mantles made of thread
and of poor quality, with which the women cover parts of their bodies. They had
many vessels [mortars] for grinding [or rather pounding] maize. The village con-
tained forty small and low houses, reared in sheltered places, out of fear of the great
storms that continuously occur in the country. The buildings are of straw, and they
are surrounded by dense timber, tall trees and numerous water-pools, where there
were so many fallen trees and of such size as to greatly obstruct and impede circulation.’

Below he adds:

In the province of Apalachen the lagunes are much larger than those we found pre-
viously. There is much maize in this province and the houses are scattered all over
the country as much as those of the Gelves.*

Following is the account of the rest of their dealings with the
Apalachee:

Two hours after we arrived at Apalachen the Indians that had fled came back peace-
ably, begging us to give back to them their women and children, which we did. The
governor, however, kept with him one of their caciques, at which they became so
angry as to attack us the following day. They did it so swiftly and with so much
audacity as to set fire to the lodges we occupied, but when we sallied forth they fled to

1 Bandelier, Journey of Cabeza de Vaca, pp. 12-13. 3 Tbid., pp. 25-26.
2 Ibid., p. 24. Ibid., p. 27.

148061 °—22 8

114 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the lagunes nearby, on account of which and of the big corn patches we could not do
them any harm beyond killing one Indian. The day after Indians from a village on
the other side came and attacked us in the same manner, escaping in the same way,
with the loss of a single man.

We remained at this village for 25 days, making three excursions during the time.
We found the country very thinly inhabited and difficult to march through, owing
to bad places, timber, and lagunes. We inquired of the cacique whom we had
retained and of the other Indians with us (who were neighbors and enemies of them)
about the condition and settlements of the land, the quality of its people, about sup-
plies, and everything else. They answered, each one for himself, that Apalachen
was the largest town of all; that further in less people were met with who were very
much poorer than those here, and that the country was thinly settled, the Inhabitants
greatly scattered, and also that further inland big lakes, dense forests, great deserts,
and wastes were met with.

Then we asked about the land to the south, its villages and resources. They said
that in that direction and nine days’ march toward the sea was a village called Aute,
where the Indians had plenty of corn and also beans and melons, and that, being so
near the sea, they obtained fish and that those were their friends. Seeing how poor
the country was, taking into account the unfavorable reports about its population and
everything else, and that the Indians made constant war upon us, wounding men and
horses whenever they went for water (which they could do from the lagunes where
we could not reach them) by shooting arrows at us; that they had killed a chief of Tuz-
cuco called Don Pedro, whom the commissary had taken along with him, we agreed to
depart and go in search of the sea, and of the village of Aute, which they had mentioned.
And so we left, arriving there five days after. The first day we traveled across lagunes
and trails without seeing a single Indian.

On the second day, however, we reached a lake very difficult to cross, the water
reaching to the chest, and there were a great many fallen trees. Once in the middle of
it, a number of Indians assailed us from behind trees that concealed them from our
sight, while others were on fallen trees, and they began to shower arrows upon us, so
that many men and horses were wounded, and before we could get out of the lagune
our guide was captured by them. After we had got out, they pressed us very hard,
intending to cut us off, and it was useless to turn upon them, for they would hide in the
lake and from there wound both men and horses.

So the Governor ordered the horsemen to dismount and attack them on foot. The
purser dismounted also, and our people attacked them. Again they fled to a lagune,
and we succeeded in holding the trail. In this fight some of our people were wounded
in spite of their good armor. There were men that day who swore they had seen two
oak trees, each as thick as the calf of a leg, shot through and through by arrows, which
is not surprising if we consider the force and dexterity with which they shoot. I
myself saw an arrow that had penetrated the base of a poplar tree for half a foot in
length. All the many Indians from Florida we saw were archers, and, being very tall
and naked, at a distance they appeared giants.

Those people are wonderfully built, very gaunt and of great strength and agility.
Their bows are as thick as an arm, from eleven to twelve spans long, shooting an
arrow at 200 paces with unerring aim. From that crossing we went to another similar
one, a league away, but while it was half a league in length it was also much more
difficult. There we crossed without opposition, for the Indians, having spent all
their arrows at the first place, had nothing wherewith they would dare attack us.
The next day, while crossing a similar place, I saw the tracks of people who went
ahead of us, and I notified the Governor, who was in the rear, so that, although the
Indians turned upon us, as we were on our guard, they could do us no harm. Once on
cpen ground they pursued us still. We attacked them twice, killing two, while they
wounded me and two or three other Christians, and entered the forest again, where we
could no longer injure them..

SWANTON } EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 115

In this manner we marched for eight days, without meeting any more natives,
until one league from the site to which I said we were going. There, as we were
marching along, Indians crept up unseen and fell upon our rear. A boy belonging toa
nobleman, called Avellaneda, who was in the rear guard, gave the alarm. Avellaneda
turned back to assist, and the Indians hit him with an arrow on the edge of the cuirass,
piercing his neck nearly through, so that he died on the spot, and we carried him
to Aute. It took us nine days from Apalachen to the place where we stopped. And
then we found that all the people had left and the lodges were burnt. But there was
plenty of maize, squash, and beans, all nearly ripe and ready for harvest. We rested
there for two days.

After this the governor entreated me to go in search of the sea, as the Indians said
it was so near by, and we had, on this march, already suspected its proximity from a
great river to which we had given the name of the Rio de la Magdalena. 1 left on the
following day in search of it, accompanied by the commissary, the captain Castillo,
Andrés Dorantes, 7 horsemen, and 50 foot. We marched until sunset, reaching
an inlet or arm of the sea, where we found plenty of oysters on which the people feasted,
and we gave many thanks to God for bringing us there.

The next day I sent 20 men to reconnoiter the coast and explore it, who returned on
the day following at nightfall, saying that these inlets and bays were very large and
went so far inland as greatly to impede our investigations, and that the coast was still
at a great distance. Hearing this and considering how ill-prepared we were for the
task, I returned to where the governor was. We found him sick, together with many
others. The night before Indians had made an attack, putting them in great stress,
owing to their enfeebled condition. The Indians had also killed one of their horses. !

The next day they left Aute and, with great exertion, reached
the spot where Cabeza de Vaca had come out on the Gulf. It was
determined to build boats and leave the country, but meanwhile, in
order to provide themselves with sufficient provisions, they made
four raids upon Aute ‘‘and they brought as many as 400 fanegas of
maize, although not without armed opposition from the Indians.”’ ?
Our author adds that “during that time some of the party went to
the coves and inlets for sea food, and the Indians surprised them
twice, killing ten of our men in plain view of the camp without our
being able to prevent it. We found them shot through and through
with arrows, for, although several wore good armor, it was not suffi-
cient to protect them, since, as I said before, they shot their arrows
with such force and precision.’’? Near the end of September, 1528,
they embarked in five barges and left the country, coasting along
toward the west, and having nothing further to do with Apalachee
or its inhabitants. The narrative given by Oviedo‘ is practically
the same; that in the ‘“‘Relacion’”’ published in the Documentos Inedi-
tos® is even briefer.

The next we learn of the Province of Apalachee is from the chroni-
clers of the great expedition of De Soto. Ranjel, who is generally
the most reliable, gives the following account:

On Wednesday, the first of October, [1539] the Governor Hernando de Soto, started
from Agile and came with his soldiers to the river or swamp of Ivitachuco, and they

1 Bandelier, op. cit., pp. 28-34. * Bandelier, op. cit., p. 39.
*Ibid., p. 38. A fanega is about equal to a 4 Oviedo, Hist. Gen., Ill, pp. 578-582.
bushel. > Doc. Ined., XIv, pp. 265-279.

116 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

made a bridge; and in the high swamp grass on the other side there was an ambuscade
of Indians, and they shot three Christians with arrows. They finished crossing this
swamp on the Friday following at noon and a horse was drowned there. At nightfall
they reached Ivitachuco and found the village in flames, for the Indians had set fire
toit. Sunday, October 5, they eame to Calahuchi, and two Indians and one Indian
woman were taken and a large amount of dried venison. There the guide whom
they had ran away. The next day they went on, taking for a guide an old Indian who
led them at random, and an Indian woman took them to Iviahica, and they found
all the people gone. And the next day two captains went on further and found all
the people gone.

Johan de Afiasco started out from that village and eight leagues from it he found
the port where Pamphilo de Narvaez had set sail in the vessels which he made.
He recognized it by the headpieces of the horses and the place where the forge was
setup and the mangers and the mortars that they used to grind corn and by the crosses
cut in the trees.

They spent the winter there, and remained until the 4th of March, 1540, in which
time many notable things befell them with the Indians, who are the bravest of men
and whose great courage and boldness the discerning reader may imagine from what
follows. Forexample, two Indians once rushed out against eight men on horseback;
twice they set the village on fire; and with ambuscades they repeatedly killed many
Christians, and although the Spaniards pursued them and burned them they were
never willing to make peace. If their hands and noses were cut off they made no
more account of it than if each one of them had been a Mucius Scaevola of Rome.
Not one of them, for fear of death, denied that he belonged to Apalache; and when
they were taken and were asked from whence they were they replied proudly: ‘‘ From
whence am I? I am an Indian of Apalache.’’? And they gave one to understand
that they would be insulted if they were thought to be of any other tribe than the
Apalaches.}

Farther on we read:

The Province of Apalache is very fertile and abundantly provided with supplies
with much corn, kidney beans, pumpkins, various fruits, much venison, many varie-
ties of birds and excellent fishing near the sea; and it is a pleasant country, though
there are swamps, but these have a hard sandy bottom.’

The account in Elvas is as follows:

The next day, the first of October, the Governor took his departure in the morning,
and ordered a bridge to be made over a river, which he had to cross. The depth
there, for a stone’s throw, was over the head, and afterward the water came to the
waist, for the distance of a crossbow-shot, where was a growth of tall and dense forest,
into which the Indians came, to ascertain if they could assail the men at work and
prevent a passage; but they were dispersed by the arrival of crossbow-men, and some
timbers being thrown in, the men gained the opposite side and secured the way.
On the fourth day of the week, Wednesday of St. Francis, the Governor crossed over
and reached Uitachuco, a town subject to Apalache, where he slept. He found it
burning, the Indians having set it on fire.

Thenceforward the country was well inhabited, producing much corn, the way
leading by many habitations like villages. Sunday, the twenty-fifth of October,
he arrived at the town of Uzela, and on Monday at Anhayca Apalache, where the
lord of all that country and Province resided. The Camp-master, whose duty it is to
divide and lodge the men, quartered them about the town, at the distance of half a

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, u, pp. 78-80. 2 Ibid., p. 82.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS Phy]

league to a league apart. There were other towns which had much maize, pumpkins,
beans, and dried plums of the country, whence were brought together at Anhayca
Apalache what appeared to be sufficient provision for the winter.' These ameixas
[persimmons] are better than those of Spain, and come from trees that grow in the
fields without being planted.

Below we read:

The Governor ordered planks and spikes to be taken to the coast for building a
piragua, into which thirty men entered well armed from the bay, going to and coming
from sea, Waiting the arrival of the brigantines, and sometimes fighting with the natives,
who went up and down the estuary in canoes. On Saturday, the twenty-ninth of No-
vember, in a high wind, an Indian passed through the sentries undiscovered, and set
fire to the town, two portions of which, in consequence, were instantly consumed.

On Sunday, the twenty-eighth of December, Juan de Afiasco arrived; and the
Governor directed Francisco Maldonado, Captain of Infantry, to run the coast to the
westward with fifty men, and look for an entrance; proposing to go himself in that
direction by land on discoveries. The same day, eight men rode two leagues about
the town in pursuit of Indians, who had become so bold that they would venture up
within crosshow-shot of the camp to kill our people. Two were discovered engaged
in picking beans, and might have escaped, but a woman being present, the wife of
one of them, they stood to fight. Before they could be killed, three horses were
wounded, one of which died in a few days.?

The balance of the narrative is practically the same as that of
Ranjel.
The following is from Biedma:

Across this stream [on the confines of Apalache] we made a bridge, by lashing many
pines together, upon which we went over with much danger, as there were Indians on
the opposite side who disputed our passage; when they found, however, that we had
landed, they went to the nearest town, called Ivitachuco, and there remained until
we came in sight, when as we appeared they set all the place on fire and took to flight.

There are many towns in this Province of Apalache, and it is a land abundant in
substance. They call all that other country we were travelling through, the Province
of Yustaga.

We went to another town, called Iniahico.*

In Garcilasso’s Florida we have some additional information re-
garding the Apalachee Indians:

Alonso de Carmona, in his Peregrinacion, remarks in particular upon the fierceness
of the Indians of the Province of Apalache, of whom he writes as follows, his words
being exactly quoted: Those Indians of Apalache are very tall, very valiant and full
of spirit; since, just as they showed themselves and fought with those who were with
Pamphilo de Narvaez, and drove them out of the country in spite of themselves, they
kept flying in our faces every day and we had daily brushes with them; and as they
failed to make any headway with us, because our Governor was very brave, energetic,
and experienced in Indian warfare, they concluded to withdraw to the woods in small
bands, and as the Spaniards were going out for wood and were cutting it in the forest
the Indians would come up at the sound of the axe and would kill the Spaniards and

1A mistake has probably been made here in the division of sentences, which must have read: ‘‘The
Camp-master, whose duty it is to divide and lodge the men, quartered them about the town. At the
distance of half a league to a league apart there were other towns which had much maize,” etc.

2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, pp. 46-49.

3 Tbid., 1, pp. 6-7.

118 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

loose the chains of the Indians whom they brought to carry back the cut wood and
take the Spaniards’ scalps, which was what they most prized, to hang upon the arm of
their bows with which they fought; and at the sound of the voices and of arms we
would immediately repair thither, and we found the consequences of a lack of precau-
tion. In that way they killed for us more than twenty soldiers, and this happened
frequently. And I remember that one day seven horsemen went out from the camp to
forage for food and to kill a little dog to eat; which we were used to do in that land, and
a day that we got something we thought ourselves lucky; and not even pheasants ever
tasted better to us. And going in search of these things they fell in with five Indians
who were waiting for them with bows and arrows, and they drew a line on the ground
and told them not to cross that or they would all die. And the Spaniards who would
not take any fooling, attacked them, and the Indians shot off their bows and killed
two horses and wounded two others, and also a Spaniard severely; and the Spaniards
killed one of the Indians and the rest took to their heels and got away, for they are
truly very nimble and are not impeded by the adornments of clothes, but rather are
much helped by going bare.'

After leaving Iviahica, De Soto came to the River Guacuca and
later reached a province called Capachequi. It is uncertain what
relation this and the subsequent places into which he came bore
to the Apalachee. Probably most of them belonged to the people
we now know as Hitchiti.

Pareja, the well-known missionary to the Timucua Indians, and
another friar, Alonso de Pefiaranda, state in letters, written in 1607,
that the Apalachee had asked for missionaries that same year through
the friars in Potano. Their statement that the Apalachee towns
numbered 107 is, of course, a gross exaggeration.” We read that in
1609 more than 28 Timucua and Apal Sue chiefs were begging for
baptism.? In 1622 an Englishman named Brigstock claims to have
visited the ‘‘ Apalachites”’ and to have discover a near them a colony
of English refugees. He published his narrative in 1644. It has
received some credencefrom as noted a student as D. G. Brinton, but
may now be dismissed as essentially a fabrication.* The need of mis-
sionaries to begin converting the Apalachee is frequently dwelt upon in
documents written between 1607 and 1633, but it was not until the
latter date that work was actually begun. A letter dated November
15, 1633, states that two monks had gone to the Province of Apa-
lachee on October 16. It adds that these people had desired conver-
sion for more than 20 years, that their country was 12 leagues in
extent and contained 15,000 to 16,000 Indians, which last statement
is of course another gross exaggeration, though indeed more moderate
than one of 30,000 made in 1618 and another of 34,000 made in 1635.?
This last placed the number of Christian converts in the province at
5,000, probably more than the total Apalachee population. By a
letter of See = 1638, we eer n that. conversions of Apalachee

1 Trans. by: Bourne, op. cit., 1, pp. 151-152. 3 John Davies, “Hist. peeves Islands, pp. 228-249.
2? Lowery, MSS.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 119

were greatly on the increase, and Gov. Damian de Vega Castro y
Pardo writes, August 22, 1639, that there had been more than a
thousand conversions there, although there were still only two friars.
He also states that he had made peace between the Apalachee and
three tribes called Chacatos, Apalochocolos, and Amacanos, evi-
dently the Chatot, Lower Creeks, and Yamasee.? Barcia informs us
that the Apalachee made war upon the Spaniards in 1638, but were
driven back into their own country, which was in turn invaded.* The
documents of the time make no mention of this struggle and I think
Barcia is in error, or more likely the notice is out of place. In 1647 a
war did break out, however, attributed to the fact that the Spaniards
were not giving the Indians as much as formerly, and also to the
influence of some Chisca (Yuchi) Indians. At that time there were
eight friars in the province and seven churches and convents. Eight
of the chiefs, of whom there were said to be more than 40, had ac-
cepted the new faith. In the revolt three missionaries were killed
and all of the churches and convents, with the sacred objects which
they contained, were destroyed, and among the slain were the lieuten-
ant of the province and his family. Capt. Don Martin de Cuera was
sent against the rebels with a troop of soldiers, but his party was
surrounded by a multitude of Indians and after a battle which lasted
all day he was forced to return to St. Augustine for reinforcements.

And then a strange thing happened, well illustrating the fickleness
of the Indian nature. Francisco Menendez Marques, acting on
advices privately received from the enemy’s country, went there in
person secretly and put down the rebellion with comparative ease,
assisted almost entirely, it would seem, by friendly Apalachee.
Twelve of the ringleaders were killed, and 26 others condemned to labor
on the fortifications of St. Augustine. The rest were pardoned, but
with the understanding that they should send additional men to work
on the fortifications of the capital. After this most of the Apalachee
sought baptism.‘ The obligation to labor in St. Augustine is a con-
stant source of complaint from this time on—sometimes by the
Indians themselves; sometimes by the friars on their behalf. In
1656 there was an uprising among the Timucua Indians, which
spread to the Apalachee, but it seems to have died out there without
necessitating drastic measures, although we learn that a captain
and 12 soldiers were placed in San Luis.!. In a letter written just
after this war we are told that there were then six monks in the
province,” and by the mission list of two years earlier we find that

! Lowery, MSS.

2Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 198; also Lowery, MSS.

*Barcia, La Florida, p. 203.

‘Lowery, MSS.: also see Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 204-205.

120 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

they had nine missions to serve. In the memorial of a missionary
named Fray Alonso de Moral, dated November 5, 1676, it is said that
there had been 16,000 Apalachee Indians in 1638, and that at the
date of writing they were reduced to 5,000,’ but it may be con-
sidered doubtful whether they ever numbered more than the
latter figure. In 1677 a body of Apalachee undertook a successful

expedition against some Chisca (Yuchi) Indians living to the west- -

ward who had committed depredations upon their settlements.
The full account of it is given elsewhere.? In 1681 Gov. Cabrera
notes that he had stopped the ball game among the Apalachee
Indians as a heathenish practice inimical to their well being. Jan-
uary 21, 1688, is noteworthy as the date on which a letter in the
Spanish and Apalachee languages was written for transmission to
King Charles II. This has fortunately been preserved, and it con-
tains practically all of the Apalachee language known to be in exist-
ence.’ The chiefs of the Apalachee express their pleasure at having
missionaries among them and at being relieved from the former
burdensome labors they were compelled to undergo in St. Augustine.
That this relief was only temporary, however, is shown by an appeal,
dated Vitachuco, February 28, 1701, made by ‘‘ Nanhula Chuba,
Don Patricio, chief of the [Apalachee] Indians”? to Gov. Qiroga y
Losada, in the name of all of the Apalachee chiefs, begging to be
relieved from work on the fortifications of St. Augustine. From
an entry in Barcia’s history it would seem that final relief was not
granted before 1703,° and as the Apalachee Nation was nearly de-
stroyed at about the same period, few were benefited by it. The
attacks of northern Indians, instigated by English in Carolina,
were increasing in frequency and violence. March 20, 1702, Gov.
Zuniga writes that infidel Indians had attacked the town of
Santa Fe in the Apalachee province and, though driven off, had
burned the church.‘

The first encounter on a large scale between the English and their
allies on the one hand and the Apalachee and Spaniards took place
in the following manner, as related by an English chronicler:

In 1702, before Queen ANNE’s Declaration of War was known in these Parts, the
Spaniards formed another Design to fall upon our Settlements by Land, at the Head
of Nine Hundred Apalachee Indians from thence. The Creek Indians, in Friendship
with this Province, coming at a Knowledge of it, and sensible of the Dangers approach-
ing, acquainted our Traders, then in the Nation with it, when this Army was actually
on their March coming down that way. The Traders having thereupon encourag’d

the Creeks to get together an Army of Five Hundred Men, headed the same, and went
out to meet the other. Both Armies met in an Evening on the Side of Flint-River, a

1 Lowery, MSS. 4 Brooks, MSS., Lib. Cong.
2 See pp. 299-304. 6 Barcia, La Florida, p. 323.
See p. 12.

f
i
f
f
t
:

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 121
Branch of the Chatabooche [Chattahoochee]. Inthe Morning, just before Break of Day
(when Indians are accustomed to make their Attacks) the Creeks stirring up their
Fires drew back at a Little Distance leaving their Blankets by the Fires in the very
same Order as they had slept. Immediately after the Spaniards and Apalatchees (as
was expected) coming on to attack them, fired and runin upon the Blankets. There-
upon the Creeks rushing forth fell on them, killed and took the greatest Part, and
entirely routed them. To this Stratagem was owing the Defeat of the then intended
Design.

Shortly after this affair, in the winter of 1703-4, occurred the great
Apalachee disaster, the invasion of Apalachia by Col. Moore
with a body of 50 volunteers from South Carolina and 1,000 Creek
auxiliaries, and the almost complete breaking up of the Apalachee
Nation. The best account of this is printed in the second volume
of Carroll’s Historical Collections of South Carolina? under the fol-
lowing heading: ‘“‘An Account of What the Army Did, under the
Command of Col. Moore, in His Expedition Last Winter, against
the Spaniards and Spanish Indians in a Letter from the Said Col.
Moore to the Governor of Carolina. Printed in the Boston News,
May 1; 1704.”” It runs as follows:

To the Governor of Carolina:

May it please your honour to accept of this short narrative of what I, with the army
under my command, have been doing since my departure from the Ockomulgee, on
the 19th * of December [1703].

On the 14th of December we came to a town, and strong and almost regular fort,
about Sun rising called Ayaville. At our first approach the Indians in it fired and
shot arrows at us briskly; from which we sheltered ourselves under the side of a great
Mud-walled house, till we could take a view of the fort, and consider of the best way
of assaulting it: which we concluded to be, by breaking the church door, which
made a part of the fort, with axes. I no sooner proposed this, but my men readily
undertook it: ran up to it briskly (the enemy at the same time shooting at them),
were beaten off without effecting it, and fourteen white men wounded. Two hours
after that we thought fit to attempt the burning of the church, which we did, three
or four Indians assisting us. The Indians obstinately defending themselves, killed
us two men, viz. Francis Plowden and Thomas Dale. After we were in their fort,
a fryar, the only white in it, came forth and begged mercy. In this we took about
twenty-six men alive, and fifty-eight women and children. The Indians took about
as many more of each sort. The fryar told us we killed, in the two storms of the fort,
twenty-five men.

The next morning the captain of St. Lewis Fort, with twenty-three men and four
hundred Indians, came to fight us, which we did; beat him; took him and eight of his
men prisoners; and, as the Indians, which say it, told us, killed five or six whites. We
have a particular account from our Indians of one hundred and sixty-eight Indian men
killed and taken in the fight; but the Apalatchia Indians say they lost two hundred,
which we have reason to believe to be the least. Capt. John Bellinger, fighting bravely
at the head of our men was killed at my foot. Capt. Fox dyed ofa wound given him at
the first storming of the fort. Two days after, I sent to the cassique of the Ibitachka,

1 As set forth in ‘Statements Made in the Introduction to the Report on General Oglethorpe’s Expedi-
tion to St. Augustine”’ (printed in Carroll's Historical Collections of South Carolina, vol. 0, p. 351).

2 Pp. 570-576.

3 There is evidently a mistake in this date, which should be the 9th instead of the 19th.

LOYD BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLy. 73

who, with one hundred and thirty men, was in his strong and well made fort, to come
and make his peace with me, the which he did, and compounded for it with his
church’s plate, and ten horses laden with provisions. After this, I marched through
five towns, which had all strong forts, and defences against small arms. They all
submitted and surrendered their forts to me without condition. I have now in my
company all the whole people of three towns, and the greatest part of four more. We
have totally destroyed all the people of four towns; so that we have left the Apalatchia
but that one town which compounded with one part of St. Lewis; and the people of one
town, which run away altogether: their town, church and fort, we burnt. The people
of St. Lewis come to me every night. I expect and have advice that the town which
compounded with me are coming after me. The waiting for these people make my
marches slow; for I am willing to bring away with me, free, as many of the Indians as I
can, this being the address of the commons to your honour to order it so. This will
make my men’s part of plunder (which otherwise might have been 100£ toa man) but
small. But I hope with your honour’s assistance to find a way to gratifie them for
their loss of blood. I never see or hear of a stouter or braver thing done, than the
storming of the fort. It hath regained the reputation we seemed to have lost under
the conduct of Robert Macken, the Indians now having a mighty value for the whites.
Apalatchia is now reduced to so feeble and low a condition, that it can neither support
St. Augustine with provisions, nor distrust, endamage or frighten us: our Indians living
between the Apalatchia and the French. In short, we have made Carolina as safe as
the conquest of Apalatchia can make it.

If I had not so many men wounded in our first attempt, I had assaulted St. Lewis
fort, in which is about 28 or 30 men, and 20 of these came thither from Pensacola to
buy provisions the first night after I took the first fort.

On Sabbath, the 23d instant, I came out of Apalatchia settle, and am now about 30
miles on my way home; but do not expect to reach it before the middle of March,
notwithstanding my horses will not be able to carry me to the Cheeraque’s Mountain.
I have had a tedious duty, and uneasy journey; and though I have no reason to fear
any harm from the enemy, through the difference between the whites, and between
Indians and Indians, bad way and false alarms, | do labour under hourly uneasiness.
The number of free Apalatchia Indians that are now under my protection, and bound
with me to Carolina, are 1300, and 100 slaves. The Indians under my command
killed and took prisoners on the plantations, whilst we stormed the fort, as many
Indians as we and they took and killed in the fort.

Dated in the woods 50 miles north and east of A palatchia.

An account of this from the Spanish side is contained in a letter
to the king written by Governor Don José de Zufiiga, March 30, 1704,
though there is a discrepancy in the dates, which differences in calen-
dar do not seem fully to account for. The mention of Guale is evi-
dently a mistake; probably Ayaville is intended. He says:

After the late siege of St. Augustine the enemy invaded San Jose and San Francisco,
destroying everything in their path, killing many Indians and carrying with them
over 500 prisoners.

They returned afterward, accompanied by the English who laid siege to this fort
and invaded the province of Apalachee, destroying all the lands. They then assaulted
Guale, on the 25th of January of the present year, which was vigorously defended by
the Indians and the clergyman, Fray Angel de Miranda, who bravely defended the
position, fighting from early in the morning until two o’clock in the afternoon, when
their ammunition was exhausted. The enemy then advanced through the passage
adjoining the church, which they set on fire, gaining possession of the passage.

On the 26th I sent my lieutenant, Juan Ruiz, with thirty Spanish soldiers mounted
and four hundred Indians. They attacked the enemy, inflicting a loss upon them of

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 123

seven Englishmen and about one hundred Indians killed, besides others that were
killed by Fray Miranda and his Indians. But our men having run out of ammuni-
tion they were in their turn finally defeated. My lieutenant was wounded by a shot
that knocked him down from his horse, and the clergyman, Fray Juan de Parga,
together with two soldiers, were killed. The rest of the force withdrew, leaving in
the hands of the enemy, my lieutenant, eight soldiers, and a few Indians as prisoners,
whom the infidels treated in the most cruel and barbarous manner, After having
bound the unfortunate Indian prisoners, by the hands and feet toa stake, they set fire
to them, when they were burned up alive. This horrible sight was witnessed by
my lieutenant and soldiers, who, naked, were tied up in the stocks. Only Fray Angel
de Miranda was free....

The affliction of the clergymen is great, and they have written to me and to their
prelate urging that they be moved away from the danger that threatens them... .

The enemy released the clergyman, the lieutenant, and four soldiers, but with the
understanding that each one was to pay a ransom of four hundred dollars, five cows,
and five horses. But the captain whom my lieutenant had left in his place, in charge
of the defence of the strong house at San Luis, sent word to the English governor that
he would not send himanything. Finally, sir, the governor withdrew with his forces
without attacking the Strong House, but not before he had succeeded in destroying five
settlements, carrying with him the Indians of two of them, together with all the cattle,
horses, and everything else that they could carry. The Indians that abandoned their
settlements and went away with the enemy numbered about six hundred.

The enemy carried away the arms, shotguns, pistols, and horses, and with flags of
peace marched upon the Strong House at old San Luis in order to ill treat the captain
that was stationed there.!

The only satisfactory French account is contained in a letter
written by Bienville to his Government. This also contains the best
statement relative to the settlement of a part of the Apalachee
refugees near Mobile. I venture to translate it as follows:

The Apalachee have been entirely destroyed by the English and the savages,
They made prisoners thirty-two Spaniards, who formed a garrison there, besides
which they had seventeen burned, including three Franciscan fathers (Peres
Cordelliers), and have killed and made prisoner six or seven thousand Apalachee,
the tribe which inhabited this country, and have killed more than six thousand head
of cattle and other domestic animals such as horses and sheep. The Spaniards have
burned the little fortress which they had there and have all retired to St. Augustine.
Of all the Apalachee savages there have escaped only four hundred persons who
have taken refuge in our river and have asked my permission to sow there and estab-
lish a village. Another nation, named Chaqueto, which was established near Pansa-
cola, has also come to settle in our river. They number about two hundred persons.
I asked them why they left the Spaniards. They told me that they did not give
them any guns, but that the French gave them to all of their allies. The English
have drawn over to themselves all of the savages who were near the castle of St. Augus-
tine, among whom there were Spanish missionaries. There remain to them [the Span-
iards] at present only two or three allied villages of the savages. The English intend
to return to besiege the castle of St. Augustine, according to information which I have
received from the governor of the said castle, and they also threaten to make the
French withdraw from Mobille. If they come here, which I do not believe, they
will not make us withdraw easily.”

1 Brooks, MSS., Miss Brooks’s translation.
2 Louisiane: Correspondence Générale, MS. vol.in Library Louisiana Historical Society, pp. 567-568.
The ‘‘Chaqueto”’ are the Chatot. E

124 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 73

Farther on we learn that the Spanish governor had offered the
chiefs of the Apalachee and Chatot very considerable presents to
return to Florida, but they refused,' stating that the French pro-
tected them better. This was written July 28, 1706, which tends
to confirm Pénicaut’s statement that the removal occurred toward
the end of 1705.2. He adds that Bienville furnished them with corn
with which to plant their first crop. The first mention of Apalachee
in the register of the old Catholic church in Mobile records the bap-
tism of a little Apalachee boy on September 6, 1706.°

Pénicaut has the following to say regarding these Apalachee:

The Apalaches perform divine service like the Catholics in France. Their grand
feast is on the day of St. Louis;* they come the evening before to ask the officers of
the fort to come to the fete in their village, and they extend great good cheer on that
day to all who come there, especially to the French.

The priests of our fort go there to perform high mass, which they listen to with
much devotion, singing the psalms in Latin, as is done in France, and, after dinner,
vespers and.the benediction of the Holy Sacrament. Men and women are there
that day very well dressed. The men have a kind of cloth overcoat and the women
cloaks, skirts of silk stuff after the French manner, except that they do not have
head coverings, their heads being uncovered; their hair, long and very black, is
braided and hangs in one or two plaits behind after the manner of the Spanish
women. Those who have too long hair bend it back as far as the middle of the
back and tie it with a ribbon.

They have a church, where one of our French priests goes to say mass Sundays
and feast days; they have a baptismal font, in which to baptize their infants, and a
cemetery side of the church, in which there is a cross, where they are buried.

Toward evening, on St. Louis’s day, after the service is finished, men, women,
and children dress in masks; they dance the rest of the day with the French
who are there, and the other savages who come that day to their village; they have |
quantities of food cooked with which to regale them. They love the French very
much, and it must be confessed that they have nothing of the savage except their
language, which is a mixture of the language of the Spaniards and of the Alibamons.°

Meantime the Apalachee carried away by Moore had been settled
near New Windsor, South Carolina, below what is now Augusta,
Georgia, where they remained until 1715, the year of the Yamasee
uprising. When that outbreak occurred, the Apalachee, as might
have been anticipated, joined the hostiles, and from then on they
disappear from English colonial history.

However, the greater part of these revolted Apalachee evidently
settled first near the Lower Creeks, a faction of whom opposed the
English. In the following letter to the crown from Goy. Juan de
Ayala of Florida we get a view of the struggle between these two
factions, and the apparent victory of that in the English interest,

1 Louisiane: Correspondence Générale, MS. vol. in Library Louisiana Historical Society, pp. 621-622.

2 Margery, Déc., v, pp. 460-461.

8 Hamilton, Colonial Mobile, 1910, p. 109.

4 It will be remembered that St. Louis was one of the leading Apalachee towns and one of those which
escaped destruction.

6 Pénicaut,in Margry, V, pp. 486-487.

SWANTON ] : EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 125

and in that fact we have an evident reason for the return of the
Apalachee to Florida which soon took place. He says:

I beg to report to Y. M. that on the 10th of July of the present year [1717] there came
to pledge obedience to Y. M., Osingulo, son and heir of the Emperor of Caveta, accom-
panied by Talialicha,' the great general and captain of war, and the cacique Adrian
[the Apalachee chief], who is a Christian, together with fifty-seven Indians their
subjects. They asked me for arms and ammunition for themselves and their people
as there were many who were in need of them.

Their entrance having been made with great public ostentation, I ordered a salute to
be fired by the guns of the royal fort. They reached the government houses amidst
great rejoicings and their usual dance and song, ‘‘ La Paloma,”’ escorted by a body of
infantry which I had sent out to meet them. Myself, together with all the ministers
and the officers of this garrison, received them at the door of my residence. All of
which will more extensively appear in the written testimony which I herewith
enclose.

They were splendidly treated and feasted during the time they remained here, not
only on account of Y. M., but also on my own and that of the city, I giving over my
own residence to the caciques, in order to please them and to induce them to return
satisfied. These attentions proved to be of great importance, as I will mention further.
They left here on the 26th of the same month of July,? and I sent with them, to go as far
as their provinces, a retired officer, lieutenant of cavalry, named Diego Pena, with
twelve soldiers, in order that they might procure, either by purchase or exchange,
some horses for the company of this garrison, for which purpose they carried with
them suflicient silver and goods and a very gorgeous and costly dress for the Emperor
as a present, together with a cane and a fine hat with plumes. When they arrived at
a place called Caveta, situated 160 leagues from this city, which is the residence of the
Emperor, they found there twelve Englishmen and a negro from Carolina, of those who
had been previous] y engaged in destroying the country, who were on horseback. They
were there with presents for the Emperor in order to draw him to their side and turn
him from this government and from the obedience pledged to Y. M. But when his
son, the cacique, who had left here so much gratified, saw that his father, the Emperor,
was consenting to the presence of the Englishmen there, he attempted to take up arms
against his father. At the same time the dissatisfied Indians, those in favor of the
English, were getting ready to fire on our aforesaid soldiers, which they would have
done had not the said Osingulo and the great general of war, Talichaliche, together
with the Christian cacique Adrian and the subjects of his towns, who were many,
taken the part of the Spaniards and accompanied them back to this city, with the
exception of the said Osingulo, who started hence for Pensacola in quest of arms and
ammunition and men in order to drive the English away and punish those dissatisfied
Indians who obeyed his father.*

To all intents and purposes, then, the English faction, which included
the head chief of Coweta, remained masters of the situation. Shortly
afterwards we hear of bands of Apalachee asking permission to estab-
lish themselves near the Spanish settlements.

In 1717 a Spanish officer reports Apalachee dispersed in west
Florida, near their former country.*. A part of them removed, how-
ever, to Pensacola, probably to be near their congeners at Mobile.

1Spelled Talichaliche below.

2 Barcia (La Florida, p. 329) says the 26th of August.

3 Brooks, MSS., Miss Brooks’s translation with some emendations: also see Barcia, La Florida, p. 329.
4 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 228.

126 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Their chief, or their principal chief, was a certain Juan Marcos, and |

Barcia says that in 1718—

He began to form a town of Apalachee Indians, the people of his own nation, in the
place which they call the Rio de los Chiscas, 5 leagues from Santa Maria de Galve[ Pensa-
cola], which was named Nuestra Sefiora de la Soledad, and San Luis; for its peopling he
sent the Apalache Indians who were in Santa Maria de Galve with the same rations that
they had in the presidio; there came together in it more than a hundred persons;
the number was increased every day; with many of the Apalache subject to Movila,
who abandoned their lands and came to the new town, causing the post great expense,
because, as they did not have crops, it was necessary to give them daily rations of
maize until the following year when they could gather fruits; Juan Marcos assured his
governor that others would come who were waiting to harvest their crops to return to the
authority of the king, from which the French had drawn them. .. . Friar Joseph del
Castillo, one of the chaplains of the post, counseled Don Juan Pedro that he should
ask the Provincial of Santa Elena for two curates who understood the language of
Apalache well in order to teach the Indians in the new town of la Soledad.!

Farther on we find the following among the items for the same year:

July 13 two Topocapa Indians came to Santa Maria de Galve, who had fled from
Movila on account of the bad treatment of the French. Don Juan Pedro sent them to
the new town of the Indians of their nation, which had been formed near the port of
San Marcos de Apalache, because they were of a nation subject to the king, who had
in their towns curates of the order of St. Francis of the province of Santa Elena,

and all those who came in this manner he sent to the people of their own nation, enter- :

tained in accordance with their quality, from which they experienced great satisfac-
tion.”

It would seem from this that Topocapa was an Apalachee town or
else a tribe supposed to be connected with the Apalachee. The new
settlement near the port of San Marcos de Apalache seems to have
been founded after La Soledad, partly in order to cover a new Span-
ish post. It was close to Apalachee Bay and therefore on the skirts
of the old Apalachee country. Further information regarding the
settlement of this place is given in the following words:

April 10 [1719] there arrived at Santa Maria de Galve the chief, Juan Marcos, goy-
ernor of the new town of la Soledad, who returned from the city of St. Augustine, stating
that he had come from founding another town of Apalaches, near the port of San
Marcos. Don Juan Pedro gave him a garment and [he gave] another to the captain
of the Yamaces, who arrived at the same time with some of his nation; the Indians left
very well satisfied, and on the 17th the chief, Juan Marcos, took away to the new town
many of the Indians of the town of la Soledad. Those who remained there, seeing that
their governor was going, although he assured them he would soon return, discussed
the election of a chief, but they did not agree further, and in order to avoid disturb-
ances came to Don Juan Pedro that he might pacify them, and he commended them
to their guardian Father that he should persuade them and that they should cease
these disputes, cautioning them that he would not entrust to them ornaments of the
church until a curate should be named for that particular town.*

The new Apalachee settlements in Florida show their influence in
the baptismal records of the old church at Mobile, for while there are

1 Barcia, La Florida, pp. 341-342. 2 Tbid., p. 344. 3 Ibid., pp. 347-348.

oe ghee tee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 197

many entries between 1704 and 1717, after that date there is a
considerable falling off... When Fort Toulouse was founded, about
1715, the Tawasa Indians, formerly neighbors of the Apalachee, set-
tled near it among the Alabama. It is probable that some Apala-
chee accompanied them. At any rate a few known to be of Apala-
chee descent are still living among the Alabama near Weleetka,
Oklahoma.

At a considerably later date we find two Apalachee towns in the
territory which the tribe formerly occupied. Goy. Dionisio de la
Vega, to whom we are indebted for information regarding these, repre-
sents them as Apalachee which had been left after the destruction
of the province. Writing August 27, 1728, he says:

The entire province of Apalache became reduced to two towns. The one called
Hamaste, distant two leagues from the fort [of San Marcos], had about sixty men,
forty women, and about the same number of children who were being taught the
doctrine. The other one, named San Juan de Guacara, which was its old name, had
about ten men, six women, and four children, all Christians.”

San Juan de Guacara was, however, originally a Timucua town, and
the above settlement may have been Timucua miscalled ‘“Apalache”’
by the governor, or they may have been Apalachee settled on the
site of a former Timucua town. Hamaste was very likely the town
established by Juan Marcos. De la Vega adds that these towns had
revolted March 20, 1727, but he had learned that some of the Indians
had ‘returned to their obedience,” while those still hostile had ap-
parently withdrawn from the neighborhood of the fort.2- Most of
those Apalachee who remained in Florida evidently gravitated at
last to the vicinity of Pensacola, where they could also be near
the Mobile band. We will now revert to these last.

As already stated, Bienville placed those Apalachee who sought
his protection near the Mobile Indians, but their settlement was
broken up by the Alabama and they took refuge near the new Fort.
Louis. Afterward Bienville assigned them lands on the River St.
Martin, a league from the fort. ‘‘This,” says Hamilton, ‘‘would be
at our Three Mile Creek, probably extending to Chickasabogue, the
St. Louis.”” He adds that ‘‘The cellar of the priest’s house still
exists behind a sawmill near Magazine Point.”?* Some time before
1733 they made another change, perhaps because so many had gone
to Pensacola. Says Hamilton:

We know that at some time they moved over across the bay from the city, where
the eastern mouth of the Tensaw River still preserves their name. They seem to
have lived in part on an island there, for in Spanish times it is mentioned as only
recently abandoned. ... Their main seat was at and above what we now know as
Blakely. Bayou Solimé probably commemorates Salome, so often named in the
baptisma.*

1 Hamilton, Colonial Mobile, pp. 109-111. 8 Hamilton, op. cit., p. 109.
*Brooks, MSS. 4 Ibid., p. 111.

128 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The last Apalachee baptismal notice in the registers of the parish
church at Mobile is under date of 1751."

In his report of 1758 De Kerlerec says under the heading ‘‘ Apata-
ches,’”’ which is of course a misprint for Apalaches:

This nation of about 30 warriors is situated on the other (i. e., east) side of Mobile
Bay. They are reduced to this small number on account of the quantity of drink
which has been sold to them in trade at all times; they are Christians and have a
curacy established among them administered by a Capuchin, who acquits himself of
it very poorly.

This nation has been attached to us for a long time. It is divided into two bands,
one of which is on Spanish territory, a dependence of Pensacola. The warriors who
are allied with us (dependent de nous) are equally of great use in conveying the dis-
patches of Tombigbee and the Alabamas, especially this latter, where we send soldiers
as little as possible on account of the too great ease with which they can desert and
pass to the English.”

In 1763 all Spanish and French possessions east of the Mississippi
passed under the government of Great Britain. This change was
not at all to the liking of most of the small tribes settled about
Mobile Bay, and a letter of M. d’Abbadie, governor of Louisiana,
dated April 10, 1764, informs us that the Taensas, Apalachee and
the Pakana tribe of the Creeks had already come over to Red
River in his province, or were about to do so. We know that such a
movement did actually take place. Probably the emigrant Apala-
chee included both the Mobile and the Pensacola bands. Sibley,
in his ‘‘Historical sketches of several Indian Tribes in Louisiana,
south of the Arkansas River, and between the Mississippi and River
Grand,” written in 1806, has the following to say regarding this
tribe:

Appalaches, are likewise emigrants from West Florida, from off the river whose
name they bear; came over to Red River about the same time the Boluxas did, and
have, ever since, lived on the river, above Bayau Rapide. No nation have been
more highly esteemed by the French inhabitants; no complaints against them are
ever heard; there are only fourteen men remaining; have their own language, but
speak French and Mobilian.*

From the papers on public lands among the American State Papers
we know that they and the Taensa Indians settled together on a
strip of land on Red River between Bayou d’Arro and Bayou Jean
de Jean. This land was sold in 1803 to Miller and Fulton, but only
a portion of it was allowed them by the United States commissioners
in 1812 on the ground that the sale had not been agreed to by the
Apalachee.* Nevertheless it is probable that the Apalachee did not
remain in possession of their lands for a much longer period, though
they appear to have lived in the same general region and to have

1 Hamilton, op. cit., p. 112. 8 Am. Antiq., XI, 252-253, Sept., 1891.

2 Internat. Congress Am., Compte Rendu, Xv 4 Sibley in Ann. of Cong., 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1085.
sess., I, p. 86. > Am. State Papers, Ind. Aff., 11, pp. 796-797.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 129

died out there or gradually lost their identity. At the present time
there are said to be two or three persons of Apalachee blood still
living in Louisiana, but they have forgotten their language and of
course all of their aboriginal culture.'

THE APALACHICOLA

There has been considerable confusion regarding this tribe, because
the name was applied by the Spaniards from a very early period to
the Lower Creeks generally, Coweta and Kasihta in one account
being mentioned as Apalachicola towns.? It is used in its general
sense in the very earliest place in the Spanish records in which the
name occurs, a letter dated August 22, 1639, and in the same way
in letters of 1686 and 1688.°

On the other hand, in the letter of 1686 the name ‘‘Apalachicoli”’
is distinctly applied also to a particular town,‘ and inasmuch as it is
clearly the name of a tribe and town in later times it is probable
that its original application was to such a tribe among or near the
Lower Creeks. From this the Spaniards evidently extended it over
the whole of the latter. That the town was considered important is
shown by the Creek name which it bears, Talwa lako, ‘‘Big Town,”’
and from Bartram’s statement that it was the leading White or
Peace town.° In one Spanish document we read that Oconee was
‘under Apalachicolo,” and at a council between the Lower Creeks
and Spaniards at San Marcos about 1738 Quilate, the chief of this
town, spoke for all. Replying to a speech of John Stuart, the
British Indian agent, delivered in the Chiaha Square, September 18,
1768, a Lower Creek speaker says: ‘“‘ There are four head men of us
have signed our Names in the presence of the whole lower Creeks as
you will see: Two of us out of the Pallachicolas which is reckoned
the Head Town of upper & lower Creeks and two out of the Cussi-
taw Town, which are friend Towns, which two towns stand for in
behalf of the upper and lower Creeks.’ It is probable that this
speaker wishes to exaggerate the representative character of the
chiefs of these two towns, but the important position assigned to
Apalachicola was not a mere invention on his part. “Jen years
later we find John Stuart writing, without the same bias as that
which the speaker quoted above may be supposed to have had,

1 Information from Dr. Milton Dunn, Colfax, La.

2 It appears in two forms, Apalachicoli and Apachicolo, the first of which is evidently in the Hitchiti
dialect, the second in Muskogee. Apalachicola isa compromise term.

® Lowery, MSS.; Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 199-201, 219-221. The latter has made an unfortunate
blunder in dating the letter of 1686 as if it were 1606.

‘Serrano y Sanz, op. cit., pp. 193, 195.

6 Bartram, Travels, p. 387.

6 Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Library.

148061 °—22 9

130 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

that this town ‘“‘is considered as the Mother & Governing Town of
the whole Nation.” !

It is quite probable, as we shall see later, that it was a tribe of con-
siderable size, often scattered among several settlements. In spite of
the roeee anes which its name bears to that of the Apalachee I am
inclined to think that there was only a remote relationship between the
two peoples, although the meanings of the two words may have
been something alike. The ending of the name resembles ofli, the
Hitchiti word for “people.” Judge G. W. Stidham told Dr.
Gatschet that he had heard the name was derived from the ridge of
earth around the edge of the square ground made in sweeping it.?
In recent times Apalachicola has always been classed: by the Creeks
as a Hitchiti-speaking town, while the fragment of Apalachee that
has come down to us shows that language to have been an independent
dialect.

According to Creek legend the Apalachicola were found in posses-
sion of southwestern Georgia when the Muskogee invaded that sec-
tion.? In 1680 two Franciscans were sent into the Province of
Apalachicola to begin missionary work, but the Coweta chief would
not allow them to remain, and the effort was soon abandoned.*

A great deal of light has been thrown upon the ethnographical
complexion of the region along Apalachicola River by the discovery
by Mr. D. I. Bushnell, Jr., of an old manuscript already alluded to
(p. 13), preserved among the Ludwell papers in the archives of the Vir-
ginia Historical Society.® This gives the account of an Indian named
Lamhatty, who was captured by a band of ‘““Tusckaroras,” in reality
probably Creeks, and who, after having been taken through various
Creek towns, was sold to the Shawnee. Later he came northward
with a hunting party of Shawnee, escaped from them, and reached
the Virginia settlements. As much of his story as he was able to
communicate was taken down by Robert Beverly, the historian, and
on the reverse side of the sheet containing it was traced a map of the
region tarough which Lamhatty had come, as Lamhatty himself
understood it. In his narrative this Indian represents himself as
belonging to the Tawasa, or, as he spells it, ‘‘Towasa,” people,
which he says consisted of 10 “nations.” In the year 1706, however,
the ‘‘Tusckaroras”’ (or Creeks?) made a descent upon them and
carried off three of the ‘‘nations.’”’ In the spring of 1707 they
carried off four more, and two fled. The narrative says “the other
- two fled,” but that would leave one still to be accounted for. It is
difficult to know just what Lamhatty means by the 10 ‘nations.’
On his map there are indeed 10 towns laid down on and near the

1 English Transcriptions, Lib. Cong. 4 Lowery, MSS.

2 Creek Mig. Leg., I, p. 127. 5 Published in Amer, Anthrop., n.s. vol. X, pp. 568-574,
3 Ibid., p. 250.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 181

lower Apalachicola, but only one is marked ‘‘TowWasa.’’ Neverthe-
less it appears likely that the 10 towns are the ‘“nations’’ to which
Lamhatty refers, especially as what he says regarding their fate
may be made to fit in very well with other information concerning
them. The names of these 10 towns are given as: ToWasa, Potihka,
Sow6lla, Choctéuh, Ogolatighoos, Tomoéka, Ephippick, Aulédly,
Socsésky, and Sunepéh. ToWasa is of course the well-known Tawasa
tribe. The five following may probably be identified with the
Pawokti, Sawokli, Chatot, Yuchi, and a band of Timucua. This last
and the Pothka are the only ones the identification of which is uncer-
tain. With the remaining four nothing can be done. Of the first
six, the Tawasa and Chatot are known to have taken refuge with the
French and may have been the two that Lamhatty says fled on the
occasion of the second attack.'| The band of Yuchi evidently remained
in this country much longer and may have been the “‘nation’’ left
out of consideration. The three others identified always remained
separate, and we are reduced to the conclusion that the four unidenti-
fied towns represented the people afterwards called Apalachicola.
They were perhaps those carried off on the last raid.

Be that as it may, the next we hear of the Apalachicola they were
settled upon Savannah River at a place known for a long time as
Palachocolas or Parachocolas Fort, on the east or southeast. side,
almost opposite Mount Pleasant, and about 50 miles from the river’s
mouth. In 1716, after the Yamasee war, the Apalachicola, and part
of the Yuchi and Shawnee, abandoned their settlements on the
Savannah and moved over to the Chattahoochee. The Apalachicola
chief at that time was named Cherokee Leechee.? The date is fixed
by a manuscript map preserved in South Carolina. They settled first
at the junction of the Flint and Chattahoochee Rivers, at a place
known long afterwards as Apalachicola Fort. Later they abandoned
this site and went higher up; in fact, they probably moved several
times.

Some early Spanish documents treat Apalachicola and Cherokee
Leechee as distinct towns. Thus in the directions given to a Spanish
emissary about to set out for the Lower Creek towns he is informed
that he would encounter these towns in the following order: ‘‘Ta-
maxle, Chalaquilicha, Yufala, Sabacola, Ocone, Apalachicalo, Oc-
mulgue, Osuche, Chiaja, Casista, Caveta.’’ This was evidently
due to the removal of a large part of the Apalachicola Indians from
the forks of Chattahoochee River to the position later occupied by
the entire tribe, while some still remained with their chief in the
district first settled.

1 Later information shows, however, that the Chatot must have fled after the first attack, for they
had gone to Mobile before July 28, 1706 (see pp. 123-124).
2“ Cherokee killer’? in Creek. Brinton, Floridian Peninsula, p. 141.

32 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Tobias Fitch, in the journal narrating his proceedings among the
Creeks in 1725, relates, under date of September 28, that Cherokee
Leechee had, indeed, intended to move north as well, but had been
frightened out of his purpose by a Spanish emissary who represented
that the English were trying to draw away his people in order to send
them all across the ocean.1 He, too, mentions Apalachicola as a
distinct town.

A Spanish document gives the name of the Apalachicola chief in
1734 as Sanachiche.? Bartram visited them in 1777 and has the
following account:

After a little refreshment at this beautiful town [Yuchi] we repacked and set off
again for the Apalachucla town, where we arrived after riding over a level plain, con-
sisting of ancient Indian plantations, a beautiful landscape diversified with groves
and lawns.

This is esteemed the mother town or capital of the Creek or Muscogulge confederacy;
sacred to peace; no captives are put to death or human blood spilt here. And when
a general peace is proposed, deputies from all the towns in the confederacy assemble
at this capital, in order to deliberate upon a subject of so high importance for the pros-
perity of the commonwealth.

And on the contrary the great Coweta town, about twelve miles higher up this
river, is called the bloody town, where the Micos, chiefs, and warriors assemble when
a general war is proposed; and here captives and state malefactors are put to death.

The time of my continuance here, which was about a week, was employed in excur-
sions round about this settlement. One day the chief trader of Apalachucla obliged
me with his company on a walk of about a mile and a half down the river, to view the
ruins and site of the ancient Apalachucla; it had been situated on a peninsula formed
by a doubling of the river, and indeed appears to have been a very famous capital
by the artificial mounds or terraces, and a very populous settlement, from its extent
and expansive old fields, stretching beyond the scope of the sight along the low grounds
of the river. We viewed the mounds or terraces, on which formerly stood their round
house or rotunda and square or areopagus, and a little behind these, on a level height
or natural step, above the low grounds, is a vast artificial terrace or four square mound,
now seven or eight feet higher than the common surface of the ground; in front of one
square or side of this mound adjoins a very extensive oblong square yard or artificial
level plain, sunk a little below the common surface, and surrounded with a bank or
narrow terrace, formed with the earth thrown out of this yard at the time of its forma-
tion; the Creeks or present inhabitants have a tradition that this was the work of the
ancients, many ages prior to their arrival and possessing this country.

The old town was evacuated about twenty years ago by the general consent of the
inhabitants, on account of its unhealthy situation, owing to the frequent inundations
of the great river over the low grounds; and moreover they grew timorous and de-
jected, apprehending themselves to be haunted and possessed with vengeful spirits,
on account of human blood that had been undeservedly spilt in this old town, having
been repeatedly warned by apparitions and dreams to leave it.

At the time of their leaving this old town, like the ruin or dispersion of the ancient
Babel, the inhabitants separated from each other, forming several bands under the
conduct or auspices of the chief of each family or tribe. The greatest number, how-
ever, chose to sit down and build the present new Apalachucla town, upon a high

1 Tobias Fitch’s Journal, in Mereness, Travels, p. 193.
2 Copy of a MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Library. This name may, however, be intended for that of
Tomochichi, the Yamacraw chief.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 138

bank of the river above the inundations. The other bands pursued different routes,
as their inclinations led them, settling villages lower down the river; some continued
their migration towards the sea coast, seeking their kindred and countrymen amongst
the Lower Creeks in East Florida, where they settled themselves.!

While this account apparently throws a great deal of light upon
the history of the Apalachicola, it actually introduces many per-
plexities. At the present time Coweta is indeed recognized as the
head war town of the Lower Creeks, but the head peace town among
them, so far as anyone can now recall, is and always was Kasihta.
Still, the name by which this Apalachicola town is now known to the
Creeks proper is, as stated above, Talwa lako, or Big Town, from
which a former prominence may be inferred. Moreover, in the
migration legend told to Oglethorpe the priority of Apalachicola as a
peace town seems to be taught, Kasihta having acquired the ‘‘white”’
character later.2 Therefore it is probable that this town did
anciently have a sort of precedence among the peace towns of the
Lower Creeks. Again it is perplexing to find that Bartram appears
to have been entirely unaware of the former residence of the Apalachi-
cola on Savannah River, though their removal had not taken place
much over 60 years earlier. In the light of other facts brought out
this seems still more confusing. He explains the reference to
“human blood undeservedly spilt in this old town” in a footnote,
which runs as follows:

About fifty or sixty years ago almost all the white traders then in the nation were
massacred in this town, whither they had repaired from the different towns, in hopes
of an asylum or refuge, in consequence of the alarm, having been timely apprised of
the hostile intentions of the Indians by their temporary wives. They all met together
in one house, under the avowed protection of the chiefs of the town, waiting the.
event; but whilst the chiefs were assembled in council, deliberating on ways and
means to protect them, the Indians in multitudes surrounded the house and set fire

to it; they all, to the number of eighteen or twenty, perished with the house in the
flames. The trader showed me the ruins of the house where they were burnt.*

This wholesale massacre reminds us so strongly of the sweeping
character of the Yamasee rebellion, which the fact itself can not have
followed by many years, that one is at first tempted to think reference
is made to that uprising. But at that time the Apalachicola were
upon Savannah River, and, since the trader was able to show Bar-
tram the ruins of the house in which the unfortunate victims were
burned, it is evident that the massacre could not have taken place
there. Another suggestion is that only part of the Apalachicola
were on Savannah River, but of this we have not the slightest
evidence. It is surprising, to say the least, that Bartram’s trading
acquaintance could not or would not tell him about the comparatively
recent immigration of this tribe among the Lower Creeks. The

1 Bartram, Travels, pp. 386-390. 3 Bartram, Travels, pp. 388-389, note.
8 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, pp. 244-251.

134 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

extensive mounds which Bartram notes must have owed their
origin for the most part to some other of the Lower Creek tribes. It
should be observed also that the people whom Bartram calls Lower
Creeks were really Seminole, and it is to the Seminole that most of
the scattered bands of Apalachicola went.

We find through a list of trading assignments made in 1761 that
the ‘“ Pallachocolas”’ were then assigned to Macartan and Campbell.
In 1797 the trader was Benjamin Steadham.?

Hawkins, in 1799, has the following to say regarding Apalachicola:

Pa-la-chooc-le is on the right bank of Chat-to-ho-che, one and a half miles below
Au-he-gee creek on a poor, pine barren flat; the land back from it is poor, broken, pine
land; their fields are on the left side of the river, on poor land.

This was formerly the first among the Lower Creek towns; a peace town, averse
to war, and called by the nation, Tal-lo-wau thluc-co (big town). The Indians are
poor, the town has lost its former consequence, and is not now much in estimation.’

This confirms Bartram and Tchikilli regarding the former impor-
tance of the town, and also shows a rather early fall of the tribe from
its high estate.

The census of 1832, taken just before the removal of the Creeks
west of the Mississippi, gives 77 “Palochokolo” Indians, and 162
“Tolowarthlocko” Indians, besides 7 slaves.‘ While there were no
doubt two settlements of these people at the time, the enumerator
has made an evident error in giving the Hitchiti name to one and
the Creek name, Talwa tako, to the other.

' The remnant are to be found principally in the neighborhood of
Okmulgee, Okla., a former capital of the Creek Nation in the west.

THE CHATOT

The only one of all of the Apalachicola River tribes which main-
tained an existence apart from the Creek confederacy was the
Chatot—or Chateaux as it is sometimes called. It is probable that
this was anciently very important, for La Harpe calls the Apalachicola
River “la riviére du Saint-Esprit, a présent des Chateaux, ou Ca-
houitas.” ° On the Lamhatty map an eastern affluent of the prin-
cipal river delineated, perhaps the Flint, is called Chouctotbab,
apparently after this tribe.“ When we first get a clear view of them
in the Spanish documents, however, they were living west of
Apalachicola River, somewhere near the middle course of the
Chipola.

The first mention appears to be in a letter of August 22, 1639,
already quoted, in which the governor of Florida states that he has

1 Ga. Col. Does., vm, pp. 522-524. 4 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., lst sess., IV, pp. 345-347.
2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1X, p. 171. > La Harpe, Jour. Hist., p. 2.
8 Tbid., m0, p. 65. § Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol. X, p. 569.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 135

made peace between the ‘‘Chacatos, Apalachocolos, and Amacanos”’
and the Apalachee. He adds:

It is an extraordinary thing, because the aforesaid Chacatos never had peace’ with
any body.'

In 1674 two missions were established among the Chatot Indians—
San Carlos de los Chacatos and San Nicolas de Tolentino. The same
year the friars were threatened by three Chiskas (Yuchi) and appealed,
to the Apalachee commandant, Capt. Juan Hernandez de Florencia,
who proceeded to the Chatot country with 25 soldiers. In the cer-
tification which these friars, Fray Miguel de Valverde and Fray
Rodrigo de la Barreda, give regarding his conduct they state that
they had converted the Chatot chiefs and more than 300 of the com-
mon people.2. In 1675, as appears from a letter from the Spanish
governor of Florida to the crown, the Chatot rebelled, incited, as he
claims, by the Chiska, wounded Fray Rodrigo de la Barreda, and
drove him to Santa Cruz, the new Apalachee mission station on
Apalachicola River.? There he was protected by Florencia, who put
an end to the disturbances,? but soon afterwards the Chatot aban-
doned their country and withdrew among the Apalachee, where they
settled in “the land of San Luis.”’* This withdrawal was probably
due to hostilities on the part of the Chiska. At the same time the
two missions appear to have been combined into one called San
Carlos de los Chacatos given in the mission list of 1680 as a “new
conversion.”’* In 1695 the governor of Florida writes that shortly
before the Lower Creeks, whom he calls ‘‘ Apalachecole,” had entered
San Carlos de los Chacatos “and carried off forty two Christians,
despoiling and plundering the church.” ° ‘This attack was only a
foretaste of what was to come, but for specific information regarding
the subsequent troubles of these people we are obliged to turn to
French and English sources.

Unfortunately the similarity between the words Chatot and Chacta,
or Choctaw, has resulted in some confusion regarding the history
of this tribe. Thus the following account in La Harpe, which is
made to apply to the Choctaw, probably refers in reality to another
English and Creek attack upon the Chatot:

Jan. 7, 1706, M. Lambert brought a Chacta chief; he brought the news that this
nation had been attacked by four thousand savages, at the head of whom were many
English, who had carried away more than three hundred women and children.*®

The following items should also be added:

Aug. 25 news was received that two hundred savages allied with the English had
gone to Pensacola, and that they had burned the houses which were outside of the

1 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 196; also Lowery, MSS. 4 See p. 323.
2 Lowery, MSS. 5 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 224.
3 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 208. 6 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., pp. 94-95.

136 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 73

fort; that they had killed ten Spaniards and a Frenchman, and made twelve slaves of
[Indians of] the Apalache and Chacta Nations.'

On the 20th [of November] two hundred Chacta arrived with four slaves and
thirteen scalps of Cahouitas and Hiltatamahans.!

Bienville’s account of the Chatot migration to the neighborhood of
Mobile and its causes has already been given.? It seems strange that
La Harpe nowhere mentions it, but from what Bienville tells us, it is
apparent that it followed upon the attack of which news had reached
Mobile January 7, 1706. The Lamhatty narrative merely says that
three “nations” of the Tawasa were destroyed first, and that in a
second expedition in the spring of 1707 four more were swept away.®
Pénicaut, usually much inferior to La Harpe in his record of events,
describes the removal at some length, though he places it in the year
1708, at least two years too late. He says:

Some days afterward, the Chactas, who were a nation repelled from the domination
of the Spaniards, arrived at Mobile with their women and children and begged MM.
d’ Artaguiette and de Bienville to give them a place in which to make their.dwelling.

Lands were assigned them at a place lower down on the right, on the shore of the bay,
in a great arm about a league in circuit. It is still called to-day l’ Anse des Chactas.*

Hamilton says that this Anse des Chactas extended ‘“‘from our

Choctaw Point west around Garrow’s Bend.” He adds:
They occupied the site of the present city of Mobile and were its first. inhabitants.
When Bienville selected this very ground for new Mobile he had to recompense

these Choctaws with land on Dog River. Maps of 1717 and later show them on the
south side of that stream, sometimes near the bay, sometimes several miles up.

He notes that their name seems to survive in the Choctaw Point
just mentioned and in an adjacent swamp known as Choctaw Swamp.
Hamilton also cites several entries referring to members of this
tribe in the baptismal registers between 1708 and 1729, but one or
two of these may be true Mississippi Choctaw, since Hamilton fails
to distinguish the two peoples.°

In speaking of the tribes about Mobile Bay Du Pratz says:

Nearest the sea on Mobile River is the little Chatot Nation, consisting of about

forty cabins; they are friends of the French, to whom they render all the services
which can be paid for. They are Catholics or reputed to be such.®

He adds that the French post, Fort Louis, was just to the north
of them. His information would apply to about the year 1738.
According to the late H. S. Halbert, of the Alabama State Depart-
ment of Archives and History, the Choctaw of Mississippi until lately
remembered this tribe, and stated that the Chatot language was dis-

JLa Harpe, Jour. Hist., p. 103- 4 Margry, V, p. 479.
2 Amer. Anthrop.n.s. vol. X, p. 568. See p. 138. 5 Colonial Mobile, pp. 113-114.
3 See p. 123. 6 Du Pratz, Hist. de La Louisiane, 1, pp. 212-213.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 13%

tinct from their own. Du Pratz, however, in speaking of the small
tribes of Mobile Bay, says:

The Chickasaws moreover, regard them as their brothers, because they have almost
the same language, as well as those to the east of Mobile who are their neighbors. !

This matter has already been considered in full.?

About the time when the other Mobile tribes left to settle in
Louisiana the Chatot departed also, as we know by Sibley’s entry
regarding them, though he is wrong in speaking of them as “ aborigi-
nes’’ of the part of Louisiana they then inhabited. His statement
probably means that they had been one of the first tribes to settle
on Bayou Beauf. The entry is as follows:

Chactoos live on Bayau Beauf, about ten miles to the southward of Bayau Rapide,
on Red River, toward Appalousa; asmall, honest people; are aborigines of the country
where they live; of men about thirty; diminishing; have their own peculiar tongue;
speak Mobilian. The lands they claim on Bayau Beauf are inferior to no part of
Louisiana in depth and richness of soil, growth of timber, pleasantness of surface, and
goodness of water.*

Their last appearance in history is in the enumeration of Indian
tribes contained in Jedidiah Morse’s Report to the Secretary of War
regarding the Indians, where they are referred to as the ‘‘Chatteau,”’
and are located on Sabine River, 50 miles above its mouth.t This
report was published in 1822, but the information applies to the
year 1817. What happened to them later we do not know, but it
is probable that they are represented by or in a Choctaw band in the
neighborhood of Kinder, Louisiana.

THE TAWASA AND PAWOKTI

The first reference to the Tawasa is by Ranjel and the Fidalgo of
Elvas. 'Tawasa is mentioned as one of the towns at which the De
Soto expedition stopped and is placed between Ulibahali (Holiwa-
hali) and Talisi (Tulsa). It is called by Ranjel Tuasi, by Elvas Toasi.®
From this location it is evident that the tribe, or part of it, was at
that time among the Upper Creeks, but from Lamhatty’s narrative
it appears they had moved southeast before 1706 and settled some-
where between Apalachicola and Choctawhatchee Rivers. A Spanish
letter of 1686 refers to the tribe in one place as ‘‘ Tauasa,’’ whose chief
was ‘‘a very great scoundrel,” in another as Tabara, the last evidently
a misprint.’ It is impossible to tell from this letter whether the
tribe was where De Soto found it or not. In 1706 and 1707, as

1 Du Pratz, Hist. de la Louisiane, 0, p. 214.

2 See Bull. 43, Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 27, 33.

3 Sibley in Annals of Congress, 9th Cong., 2d sess. (1806-7), 1087.

4 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 373.

5 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 85; 0, p. 114. On plates 2 accompanying, Tawasa (1) and Tulsa (1)

should be transposed.
6 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 196; also Lowery, MSS.

138 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 73

we know by the Lamhatty document, they were partly destroyed
and partly driven away by other Indians. As Lamhatty was him-
self a Tawasa, and since hé represents all of the ten towns to have
been Tawasa as well, it will be best to give his statement in this
place in the form in which it was recorded by Robert Beverley:

The foregoing year y° Tusckaroras made war on y* Towasas & destroyed 3 of theyr
nations (the whole consisting of ten) haveing disposed of theyr prisoners they re-
turned again & in y® Spring of y® year 1707 they swept away 4 nations more, the other
2 fled, not to be heard of.!

The rest consists of an account of the personal fortunes of Lam-
hatty himself which do not concern us. If the dates given are
correct that set by Pénicaut for the appearance of the Tawasa at
Mobile, 1705, would seem to be an error. At any rate we know that
the Tawasa, or a part of them, did seek refuge with the French.
Pénicaut’s account of their coming is as follows:

In the beginning of this year [1705]a nation of savages, named the Totiachas, came to
find M. de Bienville at Mobile in order to ask of him a place in which to establish itself;
he indicated to them a piece of land a league and a half below the fort, where they
remained while we were established at Mobile. These savages are good hunters, and
they bring to us every day all kinds of game. They brought in addition to their mova-
bles, much corn with which to sow the lands which M. de Bienville had given them.
They had left the Spaniards to come to live on the French soil, because they were
every day exposed to the incursions of the Alibamons, and they were not supported by
the Spaniards.?

In 1710, according to the same authority, the year in which the
position of the post of Mobile was changed, the Indians were relo-
cated also, or at least some of them, and he says:

The Taouachas were also placed on the river [Mobile], adjoining the Apalaches and
one league above them. They had also left the Spaniards on account of wars with the
Alibamons; they are not Christians like the Apalaches, the only Christian nation which
has come from the neighborhood of the Spaniards.*

Whether due to persistent tradition regarding the early home of
this tribe or to the fact that some individuals belonging to it did
remain in their old country, we find a Tawasa town laid down among
the Lower Creeks on several maps, as, for instance, the Purcell map
(pbe7).

It is strange that, as in the case of the Chatot, La Harpe is silent
regarding the time when these people came to Mobile or the circum-
stances attending their coming, but there are notes in his work which
attest that they were certainly there. Thus he says that ‘‘in the month
of March [1707] the Parcagoules [Pascagoula] declared war on the
Touacha Nation. M. de Bienville reconciled them.’’* The 16th
of the following November he notes that ‘‘some Touachas came to
the fort with four scalps and a young slave of the Albika [Abihka]

1 Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol. X, p. 568. 3 Tbid., p. 486.
2 Pénicaut in Margry, Vv, p. 457. 4 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., p. 101.

leet

SWANTON] BARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 139

Nation.”’! Neither La Harpe nor Pénicaut, however, drops a hint
about the time or manner of their leaving Mobile. Hamilton has the
following to say of them in addition to what Pénicaut tells us:

The only mention of them noticed in the church registers is where, in 1716, Huvé
baptized Marguerite, daughter of a savage, slave of Commissary Duclos, and a free
Taouache woman. The godmother was Marguerite Le Sueur. What became of them
we do not certainly know, but it would seem probable that as early as 1713 they had
made some change of residence. The creek Toucha, emptying into Bayou Sara some
distance east of Cleveland’s Station on the M. & B. R. R., or, according to some, into
Mobile River at Twelve Mile Island, would seem even yet to perpetuate this location,
which corresponds nearly with Delisle’s map, and one of 1744. As Touacha, it occurs
a number of times in Spanish documents.”

Hamilton’s belief that the tribe had made some change of residence
as early as 1713 is evidently founded on Pénicaut’s statement that
the Taénsa were brought to Mobile that year and given “the planta-
tion [habitation] where the Chaouachas [Tawasa] had formerly been
located, within two leagues of our fort.’’* However, we know that
this event must have taken place in the year 1715.‘

The removal of the Tawasa I believe to have been due to the estab-
lishment of Fort Toulouse, or the Alabama Fort as it is also called,
at the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa. Pénicaut sets this
down among the events of the year 1713,° but some of the other hap-
penings recorded by him for the same year, such as the removal of
the Taénsa noted above and the outbreak of the Yamasee war,
belong properly to 1715. I can not avoid the conclusion that the
establishment of this post took place in the year 1715, Bienville
having taken advantage of the Yamasee uprising to strengthen him-
self in that quarter. At any rate it must have been between 1713
and 1715, and it is an important point that just at this time the
Tawasa disappear. The mention of a Tawasa in the baptismal records
of 1716 need not trouble us,’ for the woman there referred to, although
free, had married a slave and probably remained behind when her
people migrated to their newsettlement. Their name occurs again in
the French census of 1760, when two bodies are given, one settled with
the Fus-hatchee Indians on the Tallapoosa, 4 leagues from Fort Tou-
louse, the other forming an independent body 7 leagues from that post.°
When next we hear of them it is from Hawkins in 1799, and they are
on Alabama River below the old French post, and are reckoned as
one of the four towns of the Alabama Indians.’

1 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., p. 103.

2 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, pp. 112-113.

3 Margry, Déc., v, p. 509.

4 La Harpe, op. cit., pp. 118-119.

5 Margry, op. cit., p. 511.

6 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, pp. 94-95.

7 Hawkins’s description of the Tawasa town as it existed in 1799 is given, along with descriptions of the
other Alabama towns, on pp. 197-198.

140 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The fact of this removal from Mobile Bay to the upper Alabama
is confirmed from the Indian side by Stiggins in giving what he
supposes to be the history of all of the Alabama Indians. He says:

The first settlement we find in tracing the Alabamas (a branch of the Creek or
Ispocoga tribe) is at-the confluence of the Alabama River and Tensaw Lake, near the
town of Stockton, in Baldwin County. Their settlements extended up the lake and
river as far as Fort Mimbs; their town sites and other settlements they called Towassee,
and at this time they call that extent of country Towassee Talahassee, which is Towas-
see Old Town. The white settlers of the place call it the Tensaw settlement. The
Indians say traditionally that at the time of their residence there that they were a
very rude, barbarous set of people and in a frightful state of ignorance; their missile
~ weapons for both war and subsistence were bows and arrows made of cane and pointed
with flint or bone sharpened to a point. With the same weapons they repelled their
foe in time of war; in the wintertime they got their subsistence in the forest, and they
made use of them to kill their fish in the shallow parts of the lakes in the summer
season. They say very jocosely they consider that at this time were they to meet one
of their ancestors armed in ancient manner, and dressed in full habiliment with buck-
skin of his own manufacture that it would inspire them with dread to behold his
savage appearance. They very often make mention of their forefathers of that age
calling it the time when their ancestors made an inhuman appearance, by which we
may judge that the then state of their forefathers has been handed down to them as
a very rude and frightful state almost beyond conception. They do not pretend to
any traditional account, when or for what they emigrated to this distance. They
have a tradition that many of the inhabitants of ancient Towassee for some reason
unknown to them were carried off on shipboard by the French or some other white
people many years since. It must have been in consequence of said interruption
when the Towassee settlement was depopulated and carried off on shipboard that
the remaining part of the tribe removed up the river and made the settlements and
towns Autauga and Towassee in the bend of the river below the city of Montgomery,
where they resided to the close of their hostile movements in the year of eighteen
hundred and thirteen.!

From this it appears that Autauga, the Alabama town farthest
downstream, was settled by the same people. From the records
available we learn nothing regarding the supposed deportation of
part of the tribe, but it is quite likely that some members embarked
on sailing vessels, or Stiggins may have confused the Natchez story
with this. I have already given my own explanation of the Tawasa
removal to the upper Alabama.’ There is nothing to indicate any
break in the amicable relations existing between this tribe and the
French.

We may infer that their ancient occupancy of this region, as
evidenced by the De Soto narratives, had something to do in deter-
mining them to return to it when Fort Toulouse was founded. And
it is also probable that their language was not very distantly related
to Alabama. At any rate, from this time on they followed the
fortunes of the Alabama tribe. Not long after the time to which

1 Stiggins, MS. 3 See p. 139.
2 Hawkins’s description of Autauga in 1799 is on p. 197.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 141

Hawkins’s description applies the Alabama divided, part moving
into Louisiana to be near the French, part remaining with the Eng-
lish and subsequently accompanying the rest of the Creeks into
what is now Oklahoma. Some of the Tawasa evidently went to
Louisiana, because the name is still remembered by the descendants
of that portion of the tribe and the father of one of my most intelligent
informants among them was a Tawasa. The majority, however,
would seem to have remained with the Creeks, since Tawasa and
Autauga are the only names of Alabama towns which appear on
the census roll of 1832."

In Hawkins’s time Pawokti was the name of one of the four Alabama
towns. From the resemblance between the name of the tribe and
and Pothka, one of those given on the Lamhatty map,’ and from
the fact that two other Alabama towns, Tawasa and Autauga, are
known to have come from the same region, it may be suspected
that the two were identical and that the Pawokti and Tawasa had
had similar histories.

Hawkins’s description of the town occupied by this tribe as it
existed in 1799 is given with his account of the other Alabama
towns on page 197.°

THE SAWOKLI

The earliest home of the Sawokli of which we have any indication
was upon or near the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, probably in the
neighborhood of Choctawhatchee Bay. Thus Barcia refers to ‘‘the
Provinces of Pancacola, Sabacola, and others, upon the ports and
bays of the Gulf of Mexico,’’* and the position above given agrees
very well with that assigned to them, under the name ‘‘Sowoolla,”’
upon the Lamhatty map.°

In a letter written in the year 1680 Goy. Cabrera of Florida says:

The Cazique Saucola, distant forty leagues from Apalache, came f{to the Apalache
missions] and three monks went [back] with him, but with no results.®

Fray Francisco Gutierrez de Vera, writing May 19, 1681, from
this new province, is naturally more optimistic than Cabrera, who
was by no means favorable to the missionaries. He says:

Thirty adults have been baptized in two months, including the head chief and
two sons, and his stepfather, and now, on knowing the prayers, his mother will be
also, the casique governador, his wife, and three children, and a grandson who has no

family, five sons of the principal enixa, two henixas, and other leading men with
their wives and families.®

1Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist. s&s., pp. 258-259; 4 Barcia, La Florida, p. 324.
Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, Iv, p. 578. 5 Amer. Anthrop., n.s. vol. x, p. 571.

2 Amer. Anthrop., n.s. vol. x, p. 571. 5 Lowery, MSS.

3 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 36.

a2 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY - [BULL. 73

The eniza ot henixa was of course the heniha or ‘‘second man”

of the Creeks. This reference shows that the customs of the Sawokli
were even then similar to those of the Creeks proper.

The Sawokli mission was evidently stopped shortly afterwards by
those influences which had brought the Apalachicola mission to a pre-
mature end, particularly the hostile attitude of the English.

I have ventured a guess that this was one of the three “nations”’
carried off by hostile Indians in 1706.1 At any rate, the next we
hear of them they are living among the Lower Creeks. “They are
mentioned, without being definitely located, in a Spanish letter of
ic

The De Crenay map of 1733 shows a town called ‘“Chaouakale”
on the west bank of the Chattahoochee, and another, ‘“‘Chaogouloux,”’
eastward of the Flint (pl. 5). It seems probable that part of the
tribe at least settled first near Ocmulgee River, because on the Moll
map of 1720 they are placed on the west bank of a southern affluent
of that stream. The name appears in a few later maps—for instance,
the Homann map of 1759—but none of these, except the De Crenay
map above mentioned, shows a Sawokli town on the Chattahoochee
until 1795, when it appears between the Apalachicola town and the
mouth of the Flint. This is repeated on some subsequent maps.
However, there is every reason to believe that they had been on
Chattahoochee River ever since the Yamasee war. They appear in
the Spanish enumeration of 1738 and the French estimates of 1750
and 1760. In 1761 the Sawokli trading house was owned by Crook
& Co.4 Sawokli occurs also in the lists' of Creek towns given by
Bartram,® Swan,*® and Hawkins.’ Some of these contain a big and a
little Sawokli, and Hawkins gives the following description of the two
as they existed in his time:

Sau-woo-ge-lo is six miles below O-co-nee, on the right bank of the river [the Chatta-
hoochee}, a new settlement in the open pine forest. Below this, for four and a half
miles, the land is flat on the river, and much of it in the bend is feel for corn. Here
We-lau-ne, (yellow water) a fine flowing creek, joins the river; and still lower, Co-wag-
gee, (partridge),® a creek sixty yards wide at its mouth. Its source is in the ridge
dividing its waters from Ko-e-ne-cuh, Choc-tan hatche and Telague hache;® they have
some settlements in this neighborhood, on good land.

Sau-woog-e-loo-che is two miles above Sau-woo-ge-lo, on the left bank of the river,
in oaky woods, which extend back one mile to the pine forest; they have about
twenty families, and plant in the bends of the river; they have a few cattle.

Besides the Big and Little Sawokli which Hawkins describes there
was at a very early date a northern branch living in the neighborhood

1 Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol. x, p. 568. 8 “Partridge” ‘is probably a mistranslation, the
2 Serrano y Sanz, Doce. Hist., p. 228. name being a contraction of Okawaigi (see below).
3 MS., Ayer Coll.; Miss. Proy. Arch., I, p. 96. 9The words ‘‘Choc-tan hatche and Telague
4 Ga. Col. Docs., VII, pp. 522-524. hache”’ are wanting in the MS. in the Library
5 Bartram, Travels, p. 462. of Congress.

6 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262. 10 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 11, pp. 65-66,

7 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 25.

ee I NE ee ee are ee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 143

of the Kasihta and Coweta. In a Spanish document dated 1738 this
seems to be called ‘‘Tamaxle Nuevo”’ and is represented as the
northernmost of the Lower Creek towns,' but it is usually known by
a variant of the tribal name-now under discussion, although the initial
consonant is sometimes ch rather than s. One of the two names given
above as appearing on the De Crenay map evidently refers to this band,
but which is uncertain. In the Spanish census of 1750 it occurs
again in the distorted form ‘‘Couacalé,” ' and in the French census
of 1760 it is spelled ‘‘Chaotaklé’’ and placed between Kasihta and
Coweta.2 Finally, one of my best Indian informants—a man who
was born in the country of the Lower Creeks in Alabama—remem-
bered that there were two distinct towns called Sawokli and Tca-
wokli, both of which he believed to belong to the Hitchiti group.
This latter probably gave its name to a branch of Uphapee Creek
called Chewockeleehatchee Creek, which in turn furnished the desig-
nation for a body of Tulsa who had nothing to do with the Sawokli
tribe.2 If we may trust the census of 1832, a village inhabited by
Kasihta bore the same name.*

The towns of Okawaigi (or Kawaigi) and Okiti-yagani are said to
have branched off from the Sawokli. The former is probably one of
the Sawokli towns which appear in the French census. The latter is
evidently the ‘“Oeyakbe”’ of the same list,? and the ‘“‘ Weupkees”’ of the
census of 1761,° in which the name has been translated into Muskogee,
Oiyakpi, “water (or river) fork.”” Manuel Garcia, a Spanish officer
sent against the adventurer Bowles, mentions it in the grossly dis-
torted form ‘‘ Hogue éhotehanne.’’® Okawaigi and Okiti-yakani are
both in Hitchiti, the first signifying ‘‘ Place to get water,” and the second
‘Zigzag stream land.” They are in the census list of 1832 along with
still another Sawokli off branch called Hatchee tcaba [Hatci tcaba] 7
which is to be distinguished carefully from an Upper Creek town
of the same name, a branch of Kealedji.6 After accompanying the
other Creeks west the Sawokli soon gave up their independent busk
ground and united with the Hitchiti. Their descendants are living
near Okmulgee, the former capital of the Creek Nation in the west.

THE PENSACOLA

Westward of the tribes just considered, and probably immediately
west of the Sawokli, the Spanish ‘Province of Sabacola,” lived
anciently the Pensacola. Their name, properly Pa®shi okla, “ Bread

People,’ is Choctaw or from a closely related tongue, but we know
1MS.in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. This docu- 5 Ga. Col. Docs., vim, 522.

ment incidentally serves as an additional argument 6 Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Library.

for the Hitchiti connection of the Tamati Indians. 7Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., pp. 342-344;
2 Miss. Prov. Arch.. I, p. 96, Ala. Hist. Soc. Mise. Colls., 1, p. 396,
3'See p. 245. 8 See p. 272.

4 See p. 225,

144 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

next to nothing regarding the people themselves. Our earliest
information of value concerning any of the people of this coast is
contained in the relation of Cabeza de Vaca, who encountered them
in 1528 on his way westward from the Apalachee country by sea
with the remains of the Narvaez expedition. Although none of the
tribes which the explorers met is mentioned by name there is every
reason to believe that one of them was the Pensacola. He says:

That bay from which we started is called the Bay of the Horses. We sailed seven
days among those inlets, in the water waist deep, without signs of anything like the
coast. At the end of this time we reached an island near the shore. My barge went
ahead, and from it we saw five Indian canoes coming. The Indians abandoned
them and left them in our hands, when they saw that we approached. The other
barges went on and saw some lodges on the same island, where we found plenty of ruffs
and their eggs, dried, and that was a very great relief in our needy condition. Hav-
ing taken them,we went further, and two leagues beyond found a strait between the
island and the coast, which strait we christened San Miguel, it being the day of that
saint. Issuing from it we reached the coast, where by means of the five canoes I had
taken from the Indians we mended somewhat the barges, making washboards and
adding to them and raising the sides two hands above water.

Then we set out to sea again, coasting towards the River of Palms. Every day our
thirst and hunger increased because our supplies were giving out, as well as the water
supply, for the pouches we had made from the legs of our horses soon became rotten
and useless. From time to time we would enter some inlet or cove that reached very
far inland, but we found them all shallow and dangerous, and so we navigated through
them for thirty days, meeting sometimes Indians who fished and were poor and
wretched people.

At the end of these thirty days, and when we were in extreme need of water and
hugging the coast, we heard one night a canoe approaching. When we saw it we
stopped and waited, but it would not come to us, and, although we called out, it
would neither turn back nor wait. It being night, we did not follow the canoe, but
proceeded. At dawn we saw a small island, where we touched to search for water,
but in vain, as there was none. While at anchor a great storm overtook us. We
remained there six days without venturing to leave, and it being five days since we
had drunk anything our thirst was so great as to compel us to drink salt water, and
several of us took such an excess of it that we lost suddenly five men.

I tell this briefly, not thinking it necessary to relate in particular all the distress and
hardships we bore. Moreover, if one takes into account the place we were in, and the
slight chances of relief, he may imagine what we suffered. Seeing that our thirst was
increasing and the water was killing us, while the storm did not abate, we agreed to
trust to God, our Lord, and rather risk the perils of the sea than wait there for cer-
tain death from thirst. So we left in the direction we had seen the canoe going on
the night we came here. During this day we found ourselves often on the verge of
drowning and so forlorn that there was none in our company who did not expect to
die at any moment.

It was our Lord’s pleasure, who many a time shows His favor in the hour of greatest
distress, that at sunset we turned a point of land and found there shelter and much
improvement. Many canoes came and the Indians in them spoke to us, but turned
back without waiting. They were tall and well built, and carried neither bows nor
arrows. We followed& hem to their lodges, which were nearly along the inlet, and
landed, and in front of the lodges we saw many jars with water, and great quantities
of cooked fish. The chief of that land offered all to the governor and led him ‘to

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 145

his abode. The dwellings were of matting and seemed to be permanent. When we
entered the home of the chief he gave us plenty of fish, while we gave him of our
maize, which they ate in our presence, asking for more. So we gave more to them,
and the governor presented him with some trinkets. While with the cacique at his
lodge, half an hour after sunset, the Indians suddenly fell upon us and upon our sick
people on the beach.

They also attacked the house of the cacique, where the governor was, wounding
him in the face with a stone. Those who were with him seized the cacique, but
as his people were so near he escaped, leaving in our hands a robe of marten-ermine
skin, which, I believe, are the finest in the world and give out an odor like amber
and musk. A single one can be smelt so far off that it seems as if there were a great
many. We saw more of that kind, but none like these.

Those of us who were there, seeing the governor hurt, placed him aboard the barge
and provided that most of the men should follow him to the boats. Some fifty of us
remained on land to face the Indians, who attacked thrice that night, and so furiously
as to drive us back every time further than a stone’s throw.

Not one of us escaped unhurt. I was wounded in the face, and if they had had
more arrows (for only a few were found) without any doubt they would have done us
great harm. At the last onset the Captains Dorantes, Pefialosa and Tellez, with
fifteen men, flaced themselves in ambush and attacked them from the rear, causing
them to flee and leave us. The next morning I destroyed more than thirty of their
canoes, which served to protect us against a northern wind then blowing, on account
of which we had to stay there, in the severe cold, not venturing out to sea on account
of the heavy storm. After this we again embarked and navigated for three days,
having taken along but a small supply of water, the vessels we had for it being few.
So we found ourselves in the same plight as before.

Continuing onward, we entered a firth and there saw a canoe with Indians approach-
ing. As we hailed them they came, and the governor, whose barge they neared first,
asked them for water. They offered to get some, provided we gave them something
in which to carry it, and a Christian Greek, called Doroteo Teodoro (who has already
been mentioned), said he would go withthem. The governor and others vainly tried to
dissuade him, but he insisted upon going and went, taking along a negro, while the
Indians left two of their number as hostages. At night the Indians returned and
brought back our vessels, but without water; neither did the Christians return with
them. Those that had remained as hostages, when their people spoke to them,
attempted to throw themselves into the water. But our men in the barge held them
back, and so the other Indians forsook their canoe, leaving us very despondent and
sad for the loss of those two Christians.

In the morning many canoes of Indians came, demanding their two companions,
who had remained in the barge as hostages. The governor answered that he would
give them up, provided they returned the two Christians. With those people there
came five or six chiefs, who seemed to us to be of better appearance, greater authority
and manner of composure than any we had yet seen, although not as tall as those of
whom we have before spoken. They wore the hair loose and very long, and were
clothed in robes of marten, of the kind we had obtained previously, some of them
done up in a very strange fashion, because they showed patterns of fawn-colored furs
that looked very well.

They entreated us to go with them, and said that they would give us the Christians,
water and many other things, and more canoes kept coming towards us, trying to
block the mouth of that inlet, and for this reason, as well as because the land appeared
very dangerous to remain in, we took again to sea, where we stayed with them till

148061 °—22——10

146 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

noon. And as they would not return the Christians, and for that reason neither
would we give up the Indians, they began to throw stones at us with slings, and darts, ’
threatening to shoot arrows, although we did not see more than three or four bows.

While thus engaged the wind freshened and they turned about and left us.!

This contains many interesting points. The Bay of Horses must
have been somewhere near the mouth of Apalachicola River, and
the place where they met the five Indian canoes in what the Span-
iards knew later as the province of Sabacola, though the Indians
need not have been of that tribe, as we know from the account of
Lamhatty that there were several other peoples in the neighborhood.
The poor fisher folk whom they encountered were of the same proy-
ince. The inlet in which they found the first Indian settlement
must have been either East Pass or the entrance to Pensacola Bay,
and the second entrance where Doroteo Teodoro and the negro went
after water would be either Pensacola entrance or the opening into
Mobile Bay. ‘That these points were not west of Mobile Bay at all
events is shown by one circumstance. In his narrative of the De
Soto expedition Ranjel says:

In this village, Piachi, it was learned that they had killed Don Teodoro and a black,
who came from the ships of Pamphilo de Narvaez.?

Now, from a study of the narratives, we feel sure that Piachi was
near the upper course of the Alabama River or between it and the
Tombigbee. It thus appears that the Greek and.the negro were
carried, or traveled, inland, but it is not likely that they deviated
much from the direct line inland, not more than the ascent of the
Alabama or Tombigbee would make necessary.

We need not suppose that the place where these Indians were met
was Pensacola Bay, for there is reason to believe that at least the lower
portion of Mobile Bay, perhaps the upper portion also, was in times
shortly before the opening of certain history occupied by tribes
different from those found in possession by the French. It will be
remembered that when Iberville settled at Biloxi and began to
explore the coast eastward he touched at an island which he named
Massacre Island, ‘‘ because we found there, at the southwest end, a
place where more than 60 men or women had been killed. Having
found the heads and the remainder of the bones with much of their
household articles, it did not appear that it was more than three or
four years ago, nothing being yet rotted.’’* The journal of the
second ship, Le Marin, confirms the statement, and adds:

The savages who are along this coast are wanderers (vagabonds); when they are
satiated with meat they come to the sea to eat fish, where there is an abundance of it.*

1 Bandelier, The Journey of Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca, pp. 41-49.
2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 0, p. 123.

8 Iberville in Margry, IV, p. 147.

4 Margry, Déc., Iv, p 232.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 147

)

Pénicaut, as usual, ‘improves upon the truth.’’ He says:

We were very much frightened, on landing there, to find such a prodigious number
of bones of the dead that they formed a mountain, so many there were. We learned
afterward that it was a numerous nation, which being pursued and having retired
into the country, had almost all died there of sickness, and as it is the custom of
savages to collect together all the bones of the dead, they had brought them to this
place. This nation is named Movila, of which there still remain a small number.!

Pénicaut’s conclusion was probably due to his knowledge that it

Was customary among the Choctaw, and probably some of the neigh-
boring nations as well, to treat the bones of the dead as he describes,
but his explanation is not borne out by the descriptions of Iberville
and his colleague, who are much more worthy of credence. Of course,
there is no certainty to what tribe the bones in question belonged,
but I make the suggestion that they were from some band of the
ancient coast people of whom I am speaking. It is possible that,
instead of being members of the Mobile tribe, the people killed here
had been the victims of the Mobile. Perhaps these sinister relics
and the mysterious disappearance of the Pensacola may have been
due to causes set in motion by De Soto, 20 years after the time of
Cabeza de Vaca, when he overthrew the Mobile Indians. At that
period it is not improbable that they pushed down toward the coast
and were instrumental in destroying the aboriginal inhabitants of the
region.

In November, 1539, while De Soto was in the Province of Apalachee,
Maldonado was despatched westward in the brigantines. He
returned reporting that he had discovered an excellent harbor. He
“brought an Indian from the province adjacent to this coast, which
was called Achuse, and he brought a good blanket of sable fur. They
had seen others in Apalache, but none like that.’’ This is from
Ranjel’s account.2, The Fidalgo of Elvas says that this province,
which he calls ‘‘Ochus,”’ was “‘sixty leagues from Apalache”’ and that
Maldonado had “‘found a sheltered port with a good depth of water.” *
Biedma states that Maldonado “coasted along the country, and
entered all the coves, creeks, and rivers he discovered, until he ar-
rived at a river having a good entrance and harbour, with an Indian
town on the seaboard. Some inhabitants approaching to traffic, he
took one of them, and directly turned back with him to join us.”
He adds that he was absent on this voyage two months.‘ Later the
bay in which the De Luna colonists established themselves is called the
“Bay of Ichuse,”’ or ‘‘ Ychuse,’”’ but it is uncertain whether this was

1 Margry, Déc., v, p. 383. 3 Ibid., I, p. 50.
2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, UY, p. 81. 4 Tbid., I1, pp. 8-9.

Peoe a BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Mobile or Pensacola.1_ Nevertheless, what Biedma says of the river
and his later statement, when the army reached what must have been
the Alabama, or a stream between it and the Tombigbee, that they
considered it to be “that which empties into the Bay of Chuse,’’ ?
along with the further fact that they there heard of the brigantines,?
would seem to indicate Mobile. An interesting point in connection
with this expedition of Maldonado is the mention of the ‘good
blanket of sable fur” superior to anything they had seen in Apalachee,
because it will be recalled that Cabeza de Vaca noticed in the very
same region “a robe of marten-ermine skin’ which he believed to be
“the finest in the world.’’* The blankets seen by Cabeza de Vaca and
the companions of De Soto were probably of the same sort, and it is
likely that the Indians of that particular region had peculiar skill in
making them. The names Achuse, Ochus, Ichuse, Ychuse recall the
Hitchiti word Otcisi, ‘‘people of a different speech,” and it is not
improbable that the term occurred likewise in Apalachee and was
applied to this province because the Pensacola and Mobile languages
were distinct from those spoken east of them.

In letters written in 1677 this tribe and the Chatot are mentioned
as peoples living between the Chiska Indians and the Gulf of Mexico,°
and from a letter dated May 19, 1686, and sent by Antonio Matheos,
lieutenant among the Apalachee, to the governor of Florida, it appears
that the ‘“ Panzacola”’ were then at war with the Mobile Indians,* a
circumstance which would tend to bear out my theory above ex-
pressed. Shortly afterwards, however, when a Spanish post was
established in their country the tribe itself had disappeared. Barcia
says:

They say that the province was called Pancacola because anciently a nation of

Indians inhabited it named Pancocolos, which the neighboring nations destroyed in
wars, leaving only the name in the province.’

Nevertheless, Barcia himself records encounters with Indians in the
surrounding country by the Spaniards sent to make a reconnoissance
of the harbor in 1693. His account is as follows:

On the 11th [of September] starting from the ‘‘ Punta de Gijon” and navigating in a
depth of from one to two fathoms, they went along the coast, going northeast with
easterly wind, and at a distance of about two leagues and a half, it looked as if the
water had changed its colour. They tasted it and found it sweet, and one-quarter
of a league further on it was very sweet and they were then sure it was the mouth of a
river which ran east-southeast, about three-quarters of a league and its width was
one fourth [of a league], being lost at the distance mentioned. On the north side
there is a canal, which extends about a pistol shot. They entered the first inlet

1 See p. 159. ’Serrano y Sanz, Doe. Hist., p. 197; Lowery, MSS.
2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, U, p. 17. ‘Ibid., p. 210.

3 Tbid., p. 21. ‘Barcia, La Florida, p. 316.

4 See p. 145.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 149

for about a quarter of a league and seeing some smoke rise on the south shore, they
discovered three bulks which looked like,tree trunks, but when these began to move
towards the forest, they recognised them to be Indians. They jumped on land and
although they tried to catch up with them they could not find them any more, not
even their traces, for the soil was covered with dry leaves. ?

They found the lighted fire, and on it a badly shaped earthen pan, with lungs!
of bison, very tastelessly prepared, stewing in it, and some pieces of meat toasting on
wooden roasters. On one of them some fish was transfixed, which looked like ‘‘Chu-
chos.’’ In baskets made of reed, and which the Indians call “‘Uzate” (Ugate) there
was some corn, calabash-seeds, bison-wool and hair of other animals, put in deerskin
bags, a lot of mussels (shell-fish), shells, bones and similar things. They found several
feather plumes of fine turkeys,” cardinal birds or redbirds, and other birds and many
small crosses, the sight of which delighted them, although they recognised soon that
those were spindles on which the Indian women span the wool of the bison. The
Spaniards put into one of the baskets cakes, into the other knives and scissors, and,
after erecting a cross, they returned to their boat. They navigated half a league
when they saw to starboard four or five Indians, who, in order to escape more swiftly
threw away all they carried. They [the Spaniards] landed and found several skins .
of marten, fox, otter, and bison and a lot of meat pulverised and putrid, in wooden
troughs.* In one of the baskets which were strewn about, they found some roots
looking like iris or ginger, very sweet in taste, bison-wool done up in balls, spindles
and beaver-wool or hair in bags, very soft white feathers and pulverised clay or earth
apparently for painting, combs, not so badly made, leather shoes shaped more like
boots, claws of birds and other animals, roots of dittany,* several pieces of brazil, a
very much worn, large hoe and an iron adze. The Indian huts, which they saw here,
were made of tree-bark and in the sea were two canoes or boats, one with bows and
arrows made of very strong wood and points of bone; the other was badly used [in
bad condition]. These boats showed that those Indians had probably come here
by water...

Toward the south-southeast went Don Carlos de Siguenza with captain Juan
Jordan, Antonio Fernandez, carpenter, and an artillery man, and they found a hut,
built on four posts and covered with palm leaves. Inside they found a deerskin, a
sash made of bison wool, a piece of blue cloth of Spain, about a yard and a half long
and thrown over the poles, many mother-of-pearl shells, fish-spines, animal-bones
and several large locks of [human hair]. A little further on at the foot of a tall pine
tree they saw in a hamper® a decayed body, to all appearances that of a woman; but,
leaving all this as it was, they went to the spot where they had seen the two Indians
and they found one, who fled, leaving in the place where he had been a gourd filled
with water and a bit of roasted meat; which provisions, however, made them suppose
him to be a sentinel, the more so as they soon found traces of children’s and women’s
feet, but could find nobody.®

There are also three specific references to the Pensacola by French
writers. Pénicaut states that in 1699 the chiefs of ‘‘five different
nations, named the Pascagoulas, the Capinans, the Chicachas, the
Passacolas, and the Biloxis, came with ceremony to our fort, singing,

1 Probably the whole lights, or haslet, i, e., lungs, heart, and liver.
2Plumeras de plumas de pavos finos.

3 Pilones, probably wooden mortars.

4 Which might have been flaxinella or marjoram.

5 Petaca means really a leather trunk fashicned after the style of a hamper.
6 Barcia, La Florida, pp. 309-310. Translated by Mrs. F. Bandelier.

150 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

to present the calumet to M. d’Iberville.”! La Harpe in his Journal
Historique says that on October 1, 1702, at Mobile, ‘‘other savages
were received who sang the calumet, and promised to live in peace
with the» Chicachas, the Pensacolas, and the Apalaches.’’? These
“other savages’? were probably Alabama Indians. And finally,
Bienville in an unpublished account of the native tribes of Louisiana
dating from about 1725 says that the villages of the Pensacola and
Biloxi lay near each other on Pearl River, the two containing but 40
warriors.* In a letter on Indian affairs, dated Pensacola, December.
1, 1764, is an estimate of the Indian population in the Gulf region,
and among the entries, we read, ‘‘Beloxies, Chactoes, Capinas,
Panchaculas [Pensacolas}, Washaws, Chawasaws, Pascagulas, 251.’’4
It is therefore probable that a remnant of the tribe continued a preca-
rious existence, probably in close alliance with some larger one, for a
long time after it was supposed to be extinct. This would be quite
in line with what we find in the case of so many other small tribes.

THE MOBILE AND TOHOME

So far as our information goes, the first white men to have dealings
with the Indians of Mobile Bay were probably the Spaniards under
Pinedo. Pinedo was sent out by Garay, governor of Jamaica, in the
year 1519, to explore toward the north, and he appears to have
coasted along the northern shore of the Gulf of Mexico from the
peninsula of Florida to Panuco. In the description of this voyage
in the Letters Patent we read that after having covered the entire
distance ‘“‘they then turned back with the said ships, and entered
a river which was found to be very large and very deep, at the
mouth of which they say they found an extensive town, where they
remained 40 days and careened their vessels. The natives treated
our men in a friendly manner, trading with them, and giving what
they possessed. The Spaniards ascended a distance of 6 leagues
up the river, and saw on its banks, right and left, 40 villages.”’ ®

The river referred to is usually identified with the Mississippi, but
I am entirely in accord with Mr. Hamilton in finding in it the River
Mobile.° When first known to us the banks of the Mississippi near
the ocean were not permanently occupied by even small tribes, and
occupancy the year around would have been practically impossible.
On the other hand, the shores of Mobile River must once have been
quite thickly settled, for Iberville, on his’ first visit to the Indian
tribes there, notes numbers of abandoned Indian settlements all
along the way. There seems to be practically no other place answer-

1 Margery, Déc., V, p. 378. ‘ Amer. Hist. Rev., Xx, No. 4, p. 825.
4 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., pp. 73-74. 5 Harrisse, Disc. of N. Amer., p. 168.
3 French t sanscription, Lib. Cong. 6 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 10.

Aen

ee ee ee ae eee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 151

ing to the description here given. The later depopulation can be
accounted for by the wars of which Iberville speaks and by the
pestilences, which seem to have moved just a little in advance of
the front rank of white invasion.

Narvaez encountered some of the Indians of Mobile Bay,' but
it is open to question whether they were the ones in possession in
Iberville’s time. The Province of Achuse or Ochus, discovered by
Maldonado, may also have been here, and again it may have been
about Pensacola.’

Our next historical encounter with the Mobile tribes was that
famous and sanguinary meeting between De Soto and the Mobile,
which has served to immortalize the Indians participating almost as
much as does the city which bears their name.

According to Ranjel they first heard of the people of Mobile at
“Talisi,’’ probably the Creek town now known as Talsi, where mes-
sengers reached them from Tascalu¢a, the Mobile chief. His name is
in the Choctaw language or one almost identical with Choctaw, just
as we should expect, and means ‘Black warrior.”’ Ranjel calls him
“a powerful lord and one much feared in that land.’”’ ‘‘ And soon,”’ he
adds, ‘“‘one of his sons appeared and the governor ordered his men to
mount and the horsemen to charge and the trumpets to be blown
(more to inspire fear than to make merry at their reception). And
when those Indians returned the commander sent two Christians
with them instructed as to what they were to observe and to spy out,
so that they might take counsel and be forewarned.”’

On Tuesday, October 5, 1540, the army left Talisi and, after pass-
ing through several villages, encamped the following Saturday,
October 9, within a league of Tascalug¢a’s village. ‘‘And the governor
dispatched a messenger, and he returned with the reply that he
would be welcome whenever he wished to come.”’ Ranjel’s narrative
goes on as follows:

Sunday, October 10, the governor entered the village of Tascaluc¢a, which is called
Athahachi, a recent village. And the chief was on a kind of balcony on a mound at
one side of the square, his head covered by a kind of coif like the almaizal, so that his
headdress was like a Moor’s, which gave him an aspect of authority; he also wore a
pelote or mantle of feathers down to his feet, very imposing; he was seated on some high
cushions, and many of the principal men among his Indians were with him. He was
as tall as that Tony of the Emperor, our lord’s guard, and well proportioned, a fine and
comely figure ofa man. He had ason, a young man as tall as himself, but more slender.
Before this chief there stood always an Indian of graceful mien holding a parasol on
a handle something like a round and very large fly fan, with a cross similar to that of
the Knights of the Order of St. John of Rhodes, in the middle of a black field, and the
cross was white. And although the governor entered the plaza and alighted from his

horse and went up to him, he did not rise, but remained passive in perfect composure,
and as if he had been a king.

1See pp. 144-146, *See pp. 147-148.

152 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The governor remained seated with him a short time, and after a little he arose and
said that they should come to eat, and he took him with him and the Indians came to
dance; and they danced very wel in the fashion of rustics in Spain, so that it was pleas-
ant tosee them. At night he desired to go, and the commander told him that he must
sleep there. He understood it and showed that he scoffed at such an intention for him,
being the lord, to receive so suddenly restraints upon his liberty, and dissembling, he
immediately despatched his principal men each by himself, and he slept there not-
withstanding his reluctance. The next day the governor asked him for carriers and a
hundred Indian women; and the chief gave him four hundred carriers and the rest of
them and the women he said he would give at Mabila, the province of one of his prin-
cipal vassals. And the governor acquiesced in having the rest of that unjust request
of his fulfilled in Mabila; and he ordered him to be given a horse and some buskins
and a scarlet cloak for him to ride off happy.

At last, Tuesday, October 12, they departed from the village of Atahachi, taking
along the chief, as has been said, and with him many principal men, and always the
Indian with the sunshade attending his lord, and another with a cushion And that
night they slept in the open country The next day, Wednesday, they came to
Piachi, which is a village high above the gorge of a mountain stream; and the chief of
this place was evil intentioned, and attempted to resist their passage; and as a result,
they crossed the stream with effort, and two Christians were slain, and also the prin-
cipal Indians who accompanied the chief. In this village, Piachi, it was learned that
they had killed Don Teodoro and a black, who came from the ships of Pamphilo de
Narvaez.!

Saturday, October 16, they departed thence into a mountain where they met one
of the two Christians whom the governor had sent to Mabila, and he said that in
Mabila there had gathered together much people inarms The next day they came to
a fenced village, and there came messengers from Mabila bringing to the chief much
bread made from chestnuts, which are abundant and excellent in that region.

Monday, October 18, St. Luke’s day, the governor came to Mabila, having passed
that day by several villages, which was the reason that the soldiers stayed behind to
forage and to scatter themselves, for the region appeared populous And there went
on with the governor only forty horsemen as an advance guard, and after they had
tarried a little, that the governor might not show weakness, he entered into the village
with the chief, and all his guard went in with him. Here the Indians immediately
began an areyto,? which is their fashion for a ball with dancing and song. While this
was going on some soldiers saw them putting bundles of bows and arrows slyly among
some palm leaves, and other Christians saw that above and below the cabins were
full of people concealed. The governor was informed of it, and he put his helmet on
his head and ordered all to go and mount their horses and warn all the soldiers that
had come up. Hardly had they gone out when the Indians took the entrances of the
stockade, and there were left with the governor, Luis de Moscoso and Baltasar de
Gallegos, and Espindola, the captain of the guard, and seven or eight soldiers. And
the chief went into a cabin and refused to come out of it. Then they began to shoot
arrows at the governor. Baltasar de Gallegos went in for the chief, he not being willing
to come out. He disabled the arm of a principal Indian with the slash of a knife.
Luis de Moscoso waited at the door, so as not to leave him alone, and he was fighting
like a knight and did all that was possible until ‘‘ not being able to endure any more,
he cried, Sefior Baltasar de Gallegos, come out, or I will leave you, for I cannot wait
any longer for you.” During this, Solis, a resident of Triana of Seville, had ridden
up, and Rodrigo Ranjel, who were the first, and for his sins Solis was immediately
stricken down dead; but Rodrigo Ranjel got to the gate of the town at the time when

1 See p. 145. 2A West Indian word for an Indian dance. (Note by Bourne.)

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 153

the governor went out, and two soldiers of his guard with him, and after him came
more than seventy Indians who were held back for fear of Rodrigo Ranjel’s horse, and
the governor, desiring to charge them, a negro brought up his horse; and he told Rod-
rigo Ranjel to give aid to the captain of the guard, who was left behind, for he had come
out quite used up, and a soldier of the guard with him; and he with a horse faced the
enemy until he got out of danger, and Rodrigo Ranjel returned to the governor and
had him draw out more than twenty arrows, which he bore fastened to his armour,
which was a loose coat quilted with coarse cotton. And he ordered Ranjel to watch
for Solis, to rescue him from the enemy, that they should not carry him inside. And
the governor went to collect the soldiers. There was great valour and shame that day
among all those that found themselves in this first attack and beginning of this unhappy
day; for they fought to admiration and each Christian did his duty as a most valiant
soldier. Luis de Moscoso and Baltasar de Gallegos came out with the rest of the
soldiers by another gate.

As a result the Indians were left with the village and all the renee of ‘the Chris-
tians, and with the horses that were left tied inside, which they killed immediately.
The governor collected all of the forty horse that were there and advanced to a large
open place before the principal gate of Mabila. There the Indians rushed out without
venturing very far from the stockade, and to draw them on, the horsemen made a
feint of taking flight at a gallop, withdrawing far from the walls. And the Indians
believing it to be real, came away from the village and the stockade in pursuit, greedy
to make use of their arrows. And when it was time the horsemen wheeled about
on the enemy, and before they could recover themselves, killed many with their
lances. Don Carlos wanted to go with his horse as far as the gate, and they gave the
horse an arrow shot in the breast. And not being able to turn, he dismounted to
draw out the arrow, and then another came which hit him in the neck above the
shoulder, at which, seeking confession, he fell dead. The Indians no longer dared
to withdraw from the stockade. Then the Commander invested them on every side
until the whole force had come up; and they went up on three sides to set fire to it,
first cutting the stockade with axes. And the fire in its course burned the two hundred
odd pounds of pearls that they had, and all their clothes and ornaments, and the
sacramental cups, and the moulds for making the wafers, and the wine for saying
the mass; and they were left like Arabs, completely stripped, after all their hard
toil. They had left in a cabin the Christian women, which were some slaves belonging
to the governor; and some pages, a friar, a priest, a cook, and some soldiers defended
themselves very well against the Indians, who were not able to force an entrance
before the Christians came with the fire and rescued them. And all the Spaniards
fought like men of great courage, and twenty-two died, and one hundred and forty-
eight others received six hundred and eighty-eight arrow wounds, and seven horses
were killed and twenty-nine others wounded. Women and even boys of four years
of age fought with the Christians; and Indian boys hanged themselves not to fall into
their hands, and others jumped into the fire of their own accord. See with what
good will those carriers acted. The arrow shots were tremendous, and sent with
such a will and force that the lance of one gentleman named Nufio de Tovar, made
of two pieces of ash and very good, was pierced by an arrow in the middle, as by an
auger, without being split, and the arrow made a cross with the lance.

On that day there died Don Carlos, and Francis de Soto, the nephew of the Governor,
and Johan de Gamez de Jaen, and Men Rodriguez, a fine Portugues gentleman, and
Espinosa, a fine gentleman, and another named Velez, and one Blasco de Barcarrota,
and many other honoured soldiers; and the wounded comprised ali the men of most
worth and honour in the army. They killed three thousand of the vagabonds without
counting many others who were wounded and whom they afterwards found dead in

154 | BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the cabins and along the roads. Whether the chief was dead or alive was never
known. The son they found thrust through with a lance.

After the end of the battle as described, they rested there until the I4th of
November, caring for their wounds and their horses, and they burned over much of
the country.!

Biedma’s account of this affair is as follows:

From this point (Coca) we went south, drawing towards the coast of New Spain,
and passed through several towns, before coming to another province, called Taszaluza,
of which an Indian of such size was chief that we all considered him a giant. He
awaited us quietly at his town, and on our arrival we made much ado for him, with
joust at reeds, and great running of horses, although he appeared to regard it all as a
small matter. Afterward we asked him for Indians to carry our burdens; he an-
swered that he was not accustomed to serving any one, but it was rather for others
all to serve him. The governor ordered that he should not be allowed to return to
his house, but be kept where he was. This detention among us he felt—whence
sprang the ruin that he afterwards wrought us, and it was why he told us that he could
there give us nothing, and that we must go to another town of his, called Mavila,
where he would bestow on us whatever we might ask. We took up our march in that
direction, and came toa river, a copious flood, which we considered to be that which
empties into the Bay of Chuse. Here we got news of the manner in which the boats
of Narvaez had arrived in want of water, and of a Christian, named Don Teodoro, who
had stopped among these Indians, with a negro, and we were shown a dagger that he
had worn. We were here two days, making rafts for crossing the river. In this time
the Indians killed one of the guard of the governor, who, thereupon, being angry,
threatened the cacique, and told him that he should burn him if he did not give up
to him those who had slain the Christian. He replied that he would deliver them to
us in that town of his, Mavila. The cacique had many in attendance. An Indian,
was always behind him with a fly brush of plumes, so large as to afford his person
shelter from the sun.

At nine o’clock one morning we arrived at Mavila, a small town very strongly
stockaded, situated on a plain. We found the Indians had demolished some habita-
tions about it, to present a clear field. A number of the chiefs came out to receive
us as soon as we were in sight, and they asked the governor, through the interpreter,
if he would like to stop on that plain or preferred to enter the town, and said that in
the evening they would give us the Indians to carry burdens. It appeared to our
chief better to go thither with them, and he commanded that all should enter the
town, which we did.

Having come within the enclosure, we walked about, talking with the Indians,
supposing them to be friendly, there being not over three or four hundred in sight,
though full five thousand were in the town, whom we did not see, nor did they show
themselves at all. Apparently rejoicing, they began their customary songs and
dances; and some fifteen or twenty women having performed before us a little while,
for dissimulation, the cacique got up and withdrew into one of the houses. The
governor sent to tell him that he must come out, to which he answered that he would
not; and the captain of the bodyguard entered the door to bring him forth, but seeing
many Indians present, fully prepared for battle, he thought it best to withdraw and
leave him. He reported that the houses were filled with men, ready with bows and
arrows, bent on some mischief. The governor called to an Indian passing by, who
also refusing to come, a gentleman near took him by the arm to bring him, when,
receiving a push, such as to make him let go his hold, he drew his sword and dealt
a stroke in return that cleaved away an arm.

1 Ranjel, Trans.in Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, pp. 120-128.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 155

With the blow they all began to shoot arrows at us, some from within the houses.
through the many loopholes they had arranged, and some from without. As we were
so wholly unprepared, having considered ourselves on a footing of peace, we were
obliged, from the great injuries we were sustaining, to flee from the town, leaving
behind all that the carriers had brought for us, as they had there set down their burdens.
When the Indians saw that we had gone out, they closed the gates, and beating their
drums, they raised flags, with great shouting; then, emptying our knapsacks and
bundles, showed up above the palisades all we had brought, as much as to say that they
had those things in possession. Directly as we retired, we bestrode our horses and
completely encircled the town, that none might thence anywhere escape. The
governor directed that sixty of us should dismount, and that eighty of the best
accoutred should form in four parties, to assail the place on as many sides, and the
first of us getting in should set fire to the houses, that no more harm should come to
us; so we handed over our horses to other soldiers who were not in armour, that if
any of the Indians should come running out of the town they might overtake them.

We entered the town and set it on fire, whereby a number of Indians were burned,
and all that we had was consumed, so that there remained not a thing. We fought
that day until nightfall, without a single Indian having surrendered to us, they
fighting bravely on like lions. We killed them all, either with fire or the sword, or,
such of them as came out, with the lance, so that when it was nearly dark there re-
mained only three alive; and these, taking the women that had been brought to
dance, placed the twenty in front, who, crossing their hands, made signs to us that
we should come for them. The Christians advancing toward the women, these
turned aside, and the three men behind them shot their arrows at us, when we killed
two ofthem. The last Indian, not to surrender, climbed a tree that was in the fence,
and taking the cord from his bow, tied it about his neck, and from a limb hanged him-
self.

This day the Indians slew more than twenty of our men, and those of us who escaped
only hurt were two hundred and fifty, bearing upon our bodies seven hundred and
sixty injuries from their shafts. At night we dressed our wounds with the fat of the
dead Indians, as there was no medicine left, all that belonged to us having been
burned. We tarried twenty-seven or twenty-eight days to take care of ourselves, and
God be praised that we were all relieved. The women were divided as servants
among those who were suffering most. We learned from the Indians that we were as
many as forty leagues from the sea. It was much the desire that the governor should
go to the coast, for we had tidings of the brigantines; but he dared not venture thither,
as it was already the middle of November, the season very cold; and he found it neces-
sary to go in quest of a country where subsistence might be had for the winter; here
there was none, the region being one of little food.!

The Elvas narrative parallels that of Ranjel in most particulars
but adds interesting details. It confirms the Ranjel narrative in
stating that the first messenger from Tascaluca reached De Soto at
the Talsi town. From what he tells us a little farther on it would
seem that the village called Caxa by Ranjel was the first belonging
to the Province of Tascaluca, or Tastaluca as Elvas has it. ‘‘The
following night,’’ he goes on to say, ‘‘he [De Soto] rested in a wood,
two leagues from the town where the cacique resided, and where he
was then present. He sent the field marshal, Luis de Moscoso, with
fifteen cavalry, to inform him of his approach.”’

! Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, pp. 16-21.

156 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

From this point we will follow the narrative consecutively:

The cacique was at home, in a piazza. Before his dwelling, on a high place, was
spread a mat for him, upon which two cushions were placed, one above another, to
which he went and sat down, his men placing themselves around, some way removed,
So that an open circle was formed about him, the Indians of the highest rank being
nearest to his person. One of them shaded him from the sun with a circular umbrella,
spread wide, the size of a target, with a small stem, and having a deerskin extended
over cross-sticks, quartered with red and white, which at a distance made it look of
taffeta, the colours were so very perfect. It formed the standard of the chief, which
he carried into battle. His appearance was full of dignity: he was tall of person,
muscular, lean, and symmetrical. He was the suzerain of many territories and of a
numerous people, being equally feared by his vassals and the neighboring nations.
The field marshal, after he had spoken to him, advanced with his company, their
steeds leaping from side to side, and at times towards the chief, when he, with great
gravity, and seemingly with indifference, now and then would raise his eyes and Jook
on as in contempt.

The governor approached him, but he made no movement to rise; he took him by
the hand, and they went together to seat themselves on the bench that was in the
piazza,

_ Here follows the speech of the chief, real or imaginary, which we
will omit.

The governor satisfied the chief with a few brief words of kindness. On leaving, he
determined for certain reasons, to take him along. The second day on the road he
came to a town called Piache; a great river ran near, and the governor asked for canoes.
The Indians said they had none, but that they could have rafts of cane and dried
wood, whereon they might readily enough go over, which they diligently set about
making, and soon completed. They managed them; and the water being calm, the
governor and his men easily crossed. . . .

After crossing the river of Piache, a Christian having gone to look after a woman
gotten away from him, he had been either captured or killed by the natives, and the
governor pressed the chief to tell what had been done; threatening, that should the
man not appear, he would never release him. The cacique sent an Indian thence
to Mauille, the town of a chief, his vassal, whither they were going, stating that he
sent to give him notice that he should have provisions in readiness and Indians for
loads; but which, as afterwards appeared, was a message for him to get together there
all the warriors in his country.

The governor marched three days, the last of them continually, through an inhabited
region, arriving cn Monday, the eighteenth day of October, at Mauilla. He rode
forward in the vanguard, with fifteen cavalry and thirty infantry, when a Christian he
had sent with a message to the cacique, three or four days before, with orders not to
be gone long, and to discover the temper of the Indians, came out from the town and
reported that they appeared to him to be making preparations for that while he was
present many weapons were brought, and many people came into the town, and work
had gone on rapidly to strengthen the palisade. Luis de Moscoso said that, since the
Indians were so evil disposed, it would be better to stop in the woods; to which the
governor answered, that he was impatient of sleeping out, and that he would lodge in
the town.

Arriving near, the chief came out to receive him, with many Indians singing and
playing on flutes, and after tendering his services, gave him three cloaks of marten
skins. The governor entered the town with the caciques, seven or eight men of his
guard, and three or four cavalry, who had dismounted to accompany them; and they
seated themselves in a piazza. The cacique of Tastaluca asked the governor to allow

personne a arin Eilat

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 157

him to remain there, and not to weary him any more with walking; but, finding that
was not to be permitted, he changed his plan, and under pretext of speaking with
some of the chiefs, he got up from where he sate, by the side of the governor, and
entered a house where were many Indians with their bows and arrows. The governor,
finding that he did not return, called to him; to which the cacique answered that he
would not come out, nor would he leave that town; that if the governor wished to
go in peace, he should quit at once, and not persist in carrying him away by force from
his country and its dependencies. .

The governor, in view of the determination and furious answer of the cacique,
thought to soothe him with soft words; to which he made no answer, but with great
haughtiness and contempt withdrew to where Soto could not see nor speak to him.
The governor, that he might send word for the cacique for him to remain in the country
at his will, and to be pleased to give him a guide, and persons to carry burdens, that
he might see if he could pacify him with gentle words, called to a chief who was
passing by. The Indian replied loftily that he would not listen to him. Baltasar de
Gallegos, who was near, seized him by the cloak of marten skins that he had on, drew it
off over his head, and left it in his hands; whereupon the Indians all beginning to rise
he gave him a stroke with a cutlass, that laid) open his back, when they, with loud
yells, came out of their houses, discharging their bows.

The governor, discovering that if he remained there they could not escape, and if
he should order his men, who were outside of the town, to come in, the horses might
be killed by the Indians from the houses and great injury done, he ran out; but
before he could get away he fell two or three times, and was helped to rise by those
with him. He and they were all badly wounded: within the town five Christians
were instantly killed. Coming forth, he called out to all his men to get farther off,
because there was much harm doing from the palisade. The natives discovering
that the Christians were retiring, and some, if not the greater number, at more than
a walk, the Indians followed with great boldness, shooting at them, or striking down,
such as they could overtake. Those in chains having set down their burdens near
the fence while the Christians were retiring, the people of Mauilla lifted the loads on
to their backs, and, bringing them into the town, took off their irons, putting bows and
arms in their hands, with which to fight. Thus did the foe come into possession of
all the clothing, pearls, and whatsoever else the Christians had beside, which was
what their Indians carried. Since the natives had been at peace to that place, some
of us, putting our arms in the luggage, went without any; and two, who were in the
town, had their swords and halberds taken from them and put to use.

The governor, presently as he found himself in the field, called for a horse, and,
with some followers, returned and lanced two or three of the Indians; the rest, going
back into the town, shot arrows from the palisade. Those who would venture on
their nimbleness came out a stone’s throw from behind it, to fight, retiring from time
to time, when they were set upon.

At the time of the affray there was a friar, a clergyman, a servant of the governor,
and a female slave in the town, who, having no time in which to get away, took to a
house, and there remained until after the Indians became masters of the place. They
closed the entrance with a lattice door; and there being a sword among them, which
the servant had, he put himself behind the door, striking at the Indians that would
have come in; while, on the other side, stood the friar and the priest, each with a
club in hand, to strike down the first that should enter. The Indians, finding that
they could not get in by the door, began to unroof the house; at this moment the
cavalry were all arrived at Mauilla, with the infantry that had been on the march,
when a difference of opinion arose as to whether the Indians should be attacked, in
order to enter the town; for the result was held doubtful, but finally it was concluded
to make the assault.

158 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

So soon as the advance and the rear of the force were come up the governor com-
manded that all the best armed should dismount, of which he made four squadrons
of footmen. The Indians, observing how he was going on arranging his men, urged
the cacique to leave, telling him, as was afterwards made known by some women
who were taken in the town, that as he was but one man, and could fight but as one
only, there being many chiefs present very skilful and experienced in matters of
war, any one of whom was able to command the rest, and as things in war were so sub-
ject to fortune, that it was never certain which side would overcome the other, they
wished him to put his person in safety; for if they should conclude their lives there,
on which they had resolved rather than surrender, he would remain to govern the
land; but for all that they said, he did not wish to go, until, from being continually
urged, with fifteen or twenty of his own people he went out of the town, taking with
him a scarlet cloak and other articles of the Christians’ clothing, being whatever he
could carry and that seemed best to him.

The governor, informed that the Indians were leaving the town, commanded the
cavalry to surround it; and into each squadron of foot he put a soldier, with a brand,
to set fire to the houses, that the Indians might have no shelter. His men being placed
in full concert, he ordered an arquebuse to be shot off; at the signal the four squadrons,
at their proper points, commenced a furious onset, and, both sides severely suffering
the Christians entered the town. The friar, the priest, and the rest who were with
them in the house, were all saved, though at the cost of the lives of two brave and
very able men who went thither to their rescue. The Indians fought with so great
spirit that they many times drove our people back out of the town. The struggle
lasted so long that many Christians, weary and very thirsty, went to drink at a pond
near by, tinged with the blood of the killed, and returned to the combat. The gover-
nor, witnessing this, with those who followed him in the returning charge of the foot-
men, entered the town on horseback, which gave opportunity to fire the dwellings;
then breaking in upon the Indians and beating them down, they fled out of the place,
the cavalry and infantry driving them back through the gates, where, losing the hope
of escape, they fought valiantly; and the Christians getting among them with cut-
lasses, they found themselves met on all sides by their strokes, when many, dashing
headlong into the flaming houses, were smothered, and heaped one upon another,
burned to death.

They who perished there were in all two thousand five hundred, a few more or less;
of the Christians there fell eighteen, among whom was Don Carlos, brother-in-law
of the governor; one Juan de Gamez, a nephew; Men Rodriguez, a Portuguese; and
Juan Vazquez, of Villanueva de Barcarota, men of condition and courage; the rest
were infantry. Of the living, one hundred and fifty Christians had received seven
hundred wounds from the arrows; and God was pleased that they should be healed
in little time of very dangerous injuries. Twelve horses died, and seventy were
hurt. The clothing the Christians carried with them, the ornaments for saying mass,
and the pearls, were all burned there; they having set the fire themselves, because
they considered the loss less than the injury they might receive of the Indians from
within the houses, where they had brought the things together.!

The chronicler adds that De Soto learned here that Maldonado
“was waiting for him in the port of Ochuse, six days’ travel distant.”’
Fearing, however, that the barrenness of his accomplishment up to
that time would discourage future settlements in his new province,
he remained in that place twenty-eight days and then moved on
toward the northwest. He says of this land of Mauilla:

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, pp. 87-97.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 159

The country was a rich soil, and well inhabited; some towns were very large, and
were picketed about. The people were numerous everywhere; the dwellings stand-
ing a crossbow-shot or two apart.'

In 1559 a colony consisting of 1,500 persons left Mexico under
Don Tristan de Luna and landed in a port on the north coast of
the Gulf of Mexico. If this was in the Bay of Ichuse or Ychuse, as
some say, it was probably Mobile Bay, and yet there are difficul-
ties, for the environs of Mobile Bay appear to have been well popu-
lated in early times, while the explorers found few inhabitants.
Falling short of provisions, a detachment of four companies of sol-
diers was sent inland, and 40 leagues from the port they came upon
a village called Nanipacna, which the few Indians they met gave
them to understand had been formerly a large place, but it had
been almost destroyed by people like themselves. The impression
is given that this event had happened a very short time before, but,
if there was any truth in the assertion, it could have occurred only
during De Soto’s invasion; and this is probably the event to which
reference was made, because the distance of this place from the port
is about the same as that given by the De Soto chroniclers as the
distance of Mabila from the port where Maldonado was expecting
them.? Another point of resemblance is shown by the name, which
is pure Choctaw, meaning “ Hill top.” *

In Vandera’s enumeration of the provinces visited by Juan Pardo
in 1566 and 1567 ‘“‘Trascaluza’”’ is mentioned as “‘the last of the
peopled places of Florida”’ and seven days’ journey from ‘“‘Cossa.”’ 4
It was not, however, reached by that explorer. In the letter of May
19, 1686, so often quoted, there is a reference to the tribe, bay, and
river of ‘Mobila”’ or ‘“Mouila.’”? When it was written the people
so called were at war with the Pensacola.* A bare notice of the Mobile
occurs also in a letter of 1688.°

After this no more is heard of the Mobile tribes until Iberville estab-
lished a post in Biloxi Bay which was to grow into the great French
colony of Louisiana. There were then two principal tribes in the
region, the Mobile and the Tohome or Thomez, the former on Mobile
River, about 2 leagues below the junction of the Alabama and the
Tombigbee, while the main settlement of the latter was about McIn-
tosh’s Bluff, on the west bank of the latter stream.’ Pénicaut dis-
tinguishes a third tribe, already referred to, which he calls Naniaba and
also People of the Forks.6 This last name was given to them be-

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 98.

2 See Biedma in Bourne’s De Soto, U, p. 21.

3 Mr. H. S. Halbert believed that Nanipacna was at Gees Bend on the Alabama River and was that town
afterwards indicated as an old site of the Mobile Indians. (See pl. 5.)

4 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, p. 486.

5 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 197. P

6 Thid., p. 219.

7 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 106.

8 Margry, Déc., v, pp. 425, 427.

160 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

cause they lived at the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Riv-
ers, the former evidently because their settlement was on a bluff or
hill. It is still retained in the form Nanna Hubba and in the same
locality... Since Iberville does not mention this tribe and speaks of
encountering the Tohome at the very same place,’ it is probable that
they were sometimes considered a part of the latter.

The Mobile are, of course, the identical tribe with which De Soto
had such a sanguinary encounter. The meaning of the name, prop-
erly pronounced Mowil, is uncertain; Mr. Halbert suggests that it is
from the Choctaw moeli, to skim, and also to paddle. Since De
Soto’s time the tribe had moved much nearer the sea, probably in
consequence of that encounter and as a result of later wars with
the Alabama. On the French map of De Crenay there is a place
marked ‘Vieux Mobiliens’” on the south side of the Alabama,
apparently close to Pine Barren Creek, between Wilcox and Dallas
Counties, Alabama.* This was probably a station occupied by the
Mobile tribe between the time of De Soto and the period of Iberville.

Nothing positive is known regarding the history of the Tohome
before they appear in the French narratives. On the De Crenay
map above alluded to, however, there is a short affluent of the
Alabama below where Montgomery now stands called ‘ Auke Thomé,”’
evidently identical with the creek now known as Catoma, the name of
which is probably corrupted from Auke Thomé. <Auke is evidently
oke, the Alabama word for “water” or “‘stream’”’, and the Thomé is the
spelling for the Tohome tribe used on the same map. The natural
conclusion is that the creek was named for the tribe and marked a site
which they had formerly occupied.’ Thus they, like the Mobile,
would appear to have come from the neighborhood of the Alabama
country.

Iberville says that Tohome means “ Little Chief,” but he is evidently
mistaken.® ‘Little Chief’? would require an entirely distinct combi-
nation in Choctaw or any related language; the nearest Choctaw
word is perhaps tomi, tommi, or tombi, which signifies ‘to shine,” or
“radiant,’? or “sunshine,’’ but we really know nothing about the
meaning of the tribal name.

In April, 1700, Iberville ascended Pascagoula River to visit the
tribes upon it, and there he learned that the village of the Mobile
was three days’ journey farther on toward the northeast and that
they numbered 300 men. The Tohome were said to be one day’s
journey beyond on the same river of the Mobile and they also were
said to have 300 men.

1 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 107.

2 Margery, Déc., Iv, p. 514.

3 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190 and plate 5; see footnote, page 159.

4Ibid. Mr. Halbert has suggested that Thomé may be froma Choctaw word referred to just below and
may have nothing to do with the tribe, but I believe he is in error.

5 Margry, Déc. Iv, p. 514.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 161

On leaving Pascagoula, Iberville selected two of his men to go,
with the chief of that nation and his brother, to the Choctaw, Tohome,
and Mobile, sending the chief of each nation a present and inviting
them to come and enter into relations of friendship with him.’ His
people returned in May, having gone as far as the village of the Tohome,
but they had turned back there on account of the high waters.2. In
the winter of 1700-1701 Bienville sent to the Mobile Indians for
corn.’ In January, 1702, after Iberville had reached Louisiana on
his third voyage, he sent Bienville to begin work upon a fort on
Mobile River, and soon afterwards followed him in person. This
fort, as Hamilton informs us, was located at what is now known
as Twenty-seven Mile Bluff.4 On March 4 he sent his brother ‘to
visit many abandoned settlements of the savages, in the islands
which are in the neighborhood of this place.’’ He continues as follows:

My brother returned in the evening. He noted many places formerly occupied by
the savages, which the war against the Conchaque and Alibamons has forced them
toabandon. The greater number of these settlements are inundated about half a foot
when the waters are high. These habitations are in the islands, with which this river
is full for thirteen leagues. He made a savage show him the place where their gods
are, of which all the nations in the neighborhood tell so many stories, and where the
Mobilians come to offer sacrifices. They pretend that one can not touch them without
dying immediately; that they are descended from heaven. It was necessary to give a
gun to the savage who showed the place to them. Heapproached them only stealthily
and to within ten paces. They found them by searching on a little rise in the canes,
near an ancient village which was destroyed, in one of these islands. They brought
them out. They are five figures: of a man, a woman, a child, a bear, and an owl, made
in plaster so as to look like the savages of this country. For my part I think that it was
some Spaniard who, at the time of Soto made in plaster the figures of these savages.
It appeared that that had been done a long time ago. We have them at the establish-
ment; the savages, who see them there, are surprised at our hardihood and that we do
not die. I am bringing them to France although they are not much of a curiosity.®

Five days later Iberville left to visit the Tohome, and he gives us
the following account of his trip:

The 9th I left in a felucca to go to the Tohomés. I spent the night five leagues
from there; one finds the end of the islands three leagues above the post. From the
post I have found almost everywhere, on both sides, abandoned settlements of the
savages, where it is only necessary to place settlers, who would have only canes or
reeds, or roots, to cut in order to sow; the river, above the islands, is half a league
wide and five to six fathoms deep.

The 10th I spent the night with the Tohomés, whom I found eight leagues distant
from the post, following the windings of the river. The first settlements, called
[those of the] Mobiliens, are six leagues from it. These two nations are established
along the two banks of the river and in the islands and little rivers, separated by
families; sometimes there are four or five and sometimes as many as twelve cabins
together. ‘They are very industrious, working the earth very much. The greater

1 Margry, Déc., Iv, p. 427. ¢ Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 52.
2Tbid., p. 429. 5 Iberville, in Margry, Iv, pp. 512-513.
3 [bid., p. 504.

148061 °—22 11

162 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

number of their settlements are inundated during the high waters for from eight to
ten days. The village of the Tohomés, that is to say of the Little Chief, where there
are about eight or ten cabins together, is at about the latitude of 31 degrees 22 minutes.
They have communicating trails from one to another; that place may be six and a
half leagues to the north a quarter northeast from the post. Following the rising
grounds one comes easily to these villages; it would be easy to make wagon roads;
one can go there and return at present on horseback. The ebb and flow come as far
as the Tohomés when the waters are low. According to the number of settlements,
which I have seen abandoned this river must have been well peopled. These savages
speak the language of the Bayogoulas, at least there is little difference. There are
in these two nations 350 men.!

Pénicaut mentions the arrival of the chiefs of several nations of
Indians at the Mobile fort in 1702 to sing the calumet, and among
them those of ‘‘the Mobiliens, the Thomez, and the people of the
Forks [the Naniaba].’’? The following further translation from
Pénicaut contains some interesting information regarding the tribes
with which we are dealing:

At this time five of our Frenchmen asked permission of M. de Bienville to go to
trade with the Alibamons in order to have fowls or other provisions of which they had
need. They took the occasion to leave with ten of these Alibamons, who were at
our fort of Mobile and who wished to return. On the way they stopped five leagues
from our fort in a village where were three different nations of savages assembled,
who held their feast there. They are called the Mobiliens, the Tomez and the Nama-
bas; they do not have a temple, but they have a cabin in which they perform feats
of jugglery.

To juggle (jongler), in their language, is a kind of invocation to their great spirit.
For my part, and I have seen them many times, I think that it is the devil whom
they invoke, since they go out of this cabin raving like those possessed, and then
they work sorceries, like causing to walk the skin of an otter, dead for more than two
years, and fullof straw. They work many other sorceries which would appear incredi-
ble to the reader. This is why I do not want to stop here. I would not even mention
it if I, as well as many other Frenchmen who were present there with me, had not
been witness of it. Those who perform such feats, whether they are magical or other-
wise, are very much esteemed by the other savages. They have much confidence
in their prescriptions for diseases.

They have a feast at the beginning of September, in which they assemble for a
custom like that of the ancient Lacedemonians, it is that on the day of this feast
they whip their children until the blood comes. The entire village is then assembled
in one grand open space. It is necessary that all pass, boys and girls, old and young,
to the youngest age, and when there are some children sick, the mother is whipped
forthe child. After that they begin dances, which last all night. The chiefs and the
old men make an exhortation to those whipped, telling them that it is in order to
teach them not to fear the injuries which their enemies may be able to inflict upon
them, and to show themselves good warriors, and not to cry nor weep, even in the
midst of the fire, supposing that they were thrown there by their enemies.*

Pénicaut goes on to say that four of the five prospective traders
were treacherously killed by Alabama Indians when close to their

1 Tberville, in Margry, Iv, pp. 513-514. For the Bayogoulas see Bull. 43, Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 274-279.
2 Margery, V, p. 425.
§ Pénicaut, in Margry, V, pp. 427-428.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 163

town, one barely escaping with his life, and that this was the cause
of a war between the French and that tribe.'

La Harpe, a better authority than Pénicaut, places this event in
the year 1703.2 We learn from the same explorer that in May,
1702, eight chiefs of the Alabama had come to Mobile to ask Bien-
ville whether or not they should continue their war with the Chicka-
saw, Tohome (Tomés), and Mobile, and that Bienville had advised
them to make peace.* October 1 some of them came down, sang
the calumet, and promised to make peace.’ From this it appears
that the alliance which Pénicaut represents as existing between the
Alabama and the Mobile and Tohome was not of long standing.
The act of treachery in killing four out of five French traders was,
it seems, a first act of hostility after peace had been made the year
before. The leader of the traders was named Labrie, and the one
who escaped was a Canadian.’ According to Pénicaut, Bienville’s
first attempt to obtain reparation for this hostile act had to be
given up on account of the treachery of the Mobile, Tohome,
People of the Forks, and other Indian allies who misled and aban-
doned him ‘‘because they were friends and allies of the Alibamons
against whom we were leading them to war.’’® La Harpe does not
mention this. Bienville led another party later on with little bet-
ter success. Pénicaut places this expedition in 1702,’ La Harpe in
December, 1703, and January, 1704.8 Two Tohome are mentioned
by La Harpe as deputed along with three Canadians to bring in the
Choctaw chiefs in order to make peace between them and the Chicka-
saw, who had come to Mobile to ask it. This was December 9, 1705.°
On the 18th of the same month it is noted that Bienville ‘‘recon-
ciled the Mobilian nation with that of the Thomés; they were on
the point of declarmg war against each other on account of the
death of a Mobilian woman, killed by a Thomé.’’®

This is the only mention of any difference between these two tribes;
it is enough, however, to show that there was a clear distinction
between them. In January, 1706, M. de Boisbrillant set out against
the Alabama with 60 Canadians and 12 Indians. According to La
Harpe he returned February 21 with 2 scalps and a slave.t? Péni-
caut, who places the expedition in 1702, says that he had 40 men,
killed all the men in 6 Alabama canoes, and enslaved all of the
women and children. He adds that the Mobilians begged the slaves

1 Margry, Déc., V, pp. 428-429. TIbid., pp. 429-431.

2 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., pp. 76-77, 79. §La Harpe, Jour. Hist., pp. 82-83. The accounts
8 Tbid., p. 72. of these two writers are given on pp. 194-195,

4 Ibid., pp. 73-74. 9 Ibid., p. 94.

5 Ibid., pp. 77, 79. 10 [hid., p. 96.

6 Margry, Déc., v, p. 429.

164 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

request was granted; and that because of this action the Mobile
afterwards joined the French in all the wars which they had with the
Alabama.' In view of the hostilities known to have existed between
the tribes in question when the French first arrived in the country
this last statement may well be doubted. According to Pénicaut
the Alabama and their allies marched against the Mobile in 1708
with more than 4,000 men, but, owing to the forethought of D’Arta-
guette, who had advised his Indian allies to post sentinels, they
accomplished no further damage than the burning of some cabins.’
This incursion is not mentioned by La Harpe, but, as D’Artaguette
was actually in command at the time and-La Harpe passes over the
years 1708 and 1709 in almost complete silence, such a raid is very
probable.

From what has been said above it is apparent that the Mobile and
Tohome tribes were originally distinct, but they must have united in
rather early French times. The last mention of the latter in the
narrative of La Harpe is in connection with the murder, in 1715,
of the Englishman, Hughes, who had come overland to the Mississippi,
had been captured there and sent as a prisoner to Mobile by the French,
and had afterwards been liberated by Bienville. He passed on to Pen-
sacola and started inland toward the Alabama when he was killed by a
Tohome Indian.* Bienville, about 1725, speaks of the Little Tohome
and the Big Tohome, by which he probably means the Naniaba and
the Tohome respectively. Although none of our authorities mentions
the fact in specific terms, and indeed the map of De Crenay of 1733
still places the Tohome in their old position on the Tombigbee,° it is
evident from what Du Pratz says regarding them, that by the third
decade in the eighteenth century they had moved farther south,
probably to have the protection of the new Mobile fort and partly to
be near a trading post.

A little to the north of Fort Louis is the nation of the Thomez, which is as small and
as serviceable as that of the Chatéts; it is said also that they are Catholics; they are
friends to the point of importunity.®

Keeping toward the north along the bay, one finds the nation of the Mobiliens, near
the point where the river of Mobile empties into the bay of the same name. ‘The true
name of this nation is Mowill; from this word the French have made Mobile, and then
they have named the river and the bay Mobile, and the natives belonging to this
nation Mobiliens.’

The Mobile church registers do not contain any references to the
Tohome tribe, but the Mobile, or Mobilians, are mentioned in several

1 Margry, Déc., Vv, p. 432. 5 Plate 5; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 196.

*Ibid., p. 478. 6 Du Pratz, Hist. de la Louisiane, 1, p. 213.
3 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., pp. 118-119. 7 Ibid., pp. 213-214.

4 French transcriptions, Lib. Cong.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 165

places, the first date being in 1715, the last in 1761.'. The Tohome
and Naniaba come to the surface still later in a French document
dated some time before the cession of Mobile to Great Britain (1763)?
and in a list of Choctaw towns and chiefs compiled by the English,
1771-72.° It is probable that the languages spoken by them were
so close to Choctaw that they afterwards passed as Choctaw and,
mingling with the true Choctaw, in time forgot their own original
separateness. And this probability is strengthened by a Choctaw
census made by Regis du Roullet, a French officer, in 1730, who
classes the Tohome, Naniaba, and some Indians ‘‘aux mobiliens”’
as ‘‘Choctaw established on the river of Mobile.’ 4

THE OSOCHI

On an earlier page I have registered my belief that the origin of the
Osochi is to be sought in that Florida ‘‘province”’ through which
De Soto passed shortly before reaching the Apalachee. The name is
given variously as Ug¢achile,®> Uzachil,® Veachile,’? and Ossachile.®
Since the Timucua chief Uriutina speaks of the U¢achile as ‘“‘of our
nation,” * while the chief of U¢achile is said to be ‘‘kinsman of the
chief of Caliquen,’’® it may be inferred that the tribe then spoke a
Timucua dialect.° If this were really the case it is strange that, in-
stead of retiring farther into Florida with the rest of the Timucua,
these people chose to move northward entirely away from the old
Timucua country. Nevertheless, Spanish documents do inform us
of one northward movement as an aftermath of the Timucua rebellion
in 1656." Other evidence seeming to mark out various steps in the
migration of these people has been adduced already,'? mention being
made of ‘“Tommakees”’ near the mouth of Apalachicola River about
1700 by Coxe,** ‘‘ Tomoéka”’ in the same region by Lamhatty in 1707,"
and a town or tribe near the junction of the Apalachicola and Flint
Rivers called “‘Apalache 6 Sachile”’ at a considerably later date? The
6 in the last term has been mistaken by the cartographer for the Span-
ish connective 6, but there can be no doubt that it belongs properly
with what follows. Osochi is always accented on the first syllable.
The spot indicated on this map is that at which the Apalachicola
Indians settled after the Yamasee war. We must suppose, then,

1 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 108. 10 Tlowever, it is to he noted that the tribes

2 Miss. Prov. Arch.,1, p. 26. southeast of Ocilla River are spoken of as consti-
3 Lib. Cong., MSS. tuting the Yustaga province, which is sometimes
4 French Transcriptions, Lib. Cong. distinguished from the Timucua province proper.

§ Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 0, p. 73. 1 See p. 338.

6Tbid., 1, p. 41. 12 See p. 26.

7 Thid., m1, p. 6. 18 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1850, p. 234.

8 Shipp’s De Soto and Fla., p. 299. 14 Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol. x, p. 571.

® Bourne, op. cit., I, p. 75. 16 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 210; Ruidiaz, La

Florida, 1, XLV.

166 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

unless we have to do with a very bad misprint, either that the Osochi
were considered an Apalachicola band or that they were living with
the Apalachicola midway between their old territories and the homes
of the Lower Creeks. These facts do not, of course, amount to
proof of a connection between the U¢achile and Osochi, but they
point in that direction. )

Adair, writing in the latter half of the eighteenth century, men-
tions the ‘‘Oosécha”’ as one of those nations, remains of which had
settled in the lower part of the Muskogee country.1. On the De
Crenay map (1733) their name appears under the very distorted
form Cochoutehy (or Cochutchy) east of Flint River, between the
Sawokli and Eufaula,? but the French census of 1760 shows them
between the Yuchi and Chiaha* and those of 1738 and 1750 near
the Okmulgee. In the assignment to the traders, July 3, 1761, we
find “‘The Point Towns called Ouschetaws, Chehaws and Oakmul-
gees,”’ given to George Mackay and James Hewitt along with the
Hitchiti town.’ Bartram spells the name “Hooseche,”’ and says
that they spoke the Muskogee tongue, but this is probably an error
even for his time. In 1797 their trader was Samuel Palmer.’
Hawkins, in 1799, has the following to say about them:

Oose-oo-che; is about two miles below Uchee, on the right bank of Chat-to-ho-chee;

they formerly lived on Flint river, and settling here, they built a hot house in 1794:
they cultivate with their neighbors, the Che-au-haus, below them, the land in the
point.®

The statement regarding their origin tends to tie them a little
more definitely to the tribe mentioned in the Spanish map. The
census of 1832 gives two settlements as occupied by this tribe, which
it spells ‘‘Oswichee,”’ one on Chattahoochee River and one ‘“‘on the
waters of Opillike Hatchee (Opile’ki ha’tci).2 In 1804 Hawkins
condemns the Osochi for a reactionary outbreak which occurred
there when “‘we were told they would adhere to old times, they
preferred the old bow and arrow to the gun.’ After their removal
west of the Mississippi the Osochi were settled on the north side of
the Arkansas some distance above the present city of Muskogee.
Later a part of them moved over close to Council Hill to be near the
Hitchiti and also, according to another authority, on account of the
Green Peach war. An old man belonging to this group told me
that his grandmother could speak Hitchiti, and he believed that in
the past more spoke Hitchiti than Creek. This is also indicated
by the close association of the Osochi and Chiaha in early days.

1 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257. 7 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls.,1x, p. 171.

2 Plate 5; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190. 8 Ibid., m1, p. 63.

3 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 96. 9 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., pp. 353-356;
4MSS., Ayer Coll. Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, Iv, p. 578.

§ Ga. Col. Does., Vm, p. 522. 10 Ga, Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 438.

6 Bartram, Travels, p. 462.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 167

The two together settled a town known as Hotalgihuyana.'! Their
familiarity with Hitchiti may have been merely a natural result of
long association with Chiaha and Apalachicola Indians. No remem-
brance of any language other than Hitchiti and Muskogee is preserved
among them.

THE CHIAHA

The Chiaha were a more prominent tribe and evidently much
larger than those last mentioned. While the significance of their
name is unknown it recalls the Choctaw chaha, “high,” “height,’’
and this would be in harmony with the situation in which part of the
tribe was first encountered northward near the mountains of Tennessee.
There is also a Cherokee place name which superficially resembles
this, but should not be confounded with it. It is written by Mooney
Tsiyahi and signifies ‘‘Otter place.’”” One settlement so named
formerly existed on a branch of the Keowee River, near the present
Cheohee, Oconee County, South Carolina; another in Cades Cove,
on Cove Creek, in Blount County, Tennessee; and a third, still occu-
pied, about Robbinsville, in Graham County, North Carolina.?

As a matter of fact we know from later history that there were at
least two Chiahas in very early times—one as above indicated and
a second among the Yamasee. In discussing the Cusabo I have
already spoken of the possibility that the Kiawa of Ashley River
were a third group of Chiaha, and will merely note the point again in
passing.’ That there were Chiaha among the Yamasee is proved by a
passage in the manuscript volume of proceedings of the board dealing
with the Indian trade of Carolina. There we find it recorded that in
1713 an agent of this board among the Lower Creeks proposed that a
way be prepared that ‘‘the Cheehaws who were formerly belonging to
the Yamassees and now settled among the Creeks might return.’
This seems to be confirmed by the presence of a Chehaw River in
South Carolma between the Edisto and Combahee, though it is
possible that that received its name from the Kiawa. There is,
however, another line of evidence. In 1566 and 1567 Juan Pardo
made two expeditions inland toward the northwest, and reached
among other places in the second of these the Chiaha whom De Soto
had formerly encountered. Now Pardo calls them ‘“‘Chihaque, que
tiene por otro nombre se llama Lameco,’ and in another place
‘““Lameco, que tiene por otro nombre Chiaha,’’® while in Vandera’s
account we read ‘“‘Solameco, y por otro nombre Chiaha.’” Gat-
schet derives this last from the Creek Sili miko, “‘ Buzzard chief,’

1 See pp. 170, 409. © Ruidiaz, La Florida, 11, p. 471.
2? Mooney in 19th Ann, Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p. 538. (Ibid., p. 472.
3 See p. 25. 7 Ibid., p. 484.

4 MS. as above, p. 66.

168 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

but attention should be called to a similar name recorded by the
De Soto chroniclers in the neighborhood of the lower Savannah.
This is the Talimeco or Jalameco of Ranjel,! and the Talomeco of
Garcilasso.?, I venture the suggestion that all of these names are
intended for the same word, Talimico or Talimiko, which again
was probably from Creek Talwa immiko, ‘‘town its chief,’ —wa
bemg uniformly dropped in composition. The name would probably
be applied to an important town. While we do not know definitely that
it was applied to the Chiaha among the Yamasee, the fact that a tribe
by that name is mentioned as living in the immediate neighborhood
may be significant. In fact I am inclined to believe that the Talimeco,
Jalameco, or Talomeco of the chroniclers of De Soto were the south-
ern band of Chiaha. If this were the case the first appearance of
both Chiaha bands in history would be in the De Soto chronicles.

The Spaniards first learned of Talimeco from ‘‘the lady of
Cofitachequi,’ who speaks of it as ‘‘my village,’* but the ex-
pression as quoted by Ranjel hardly agrees with his later state-
ment to the effect that “this Talimeco was a village holding
extensive sway.’* The relation which Cofitachequi and Tali-
meco bore to each other is rather perplexing, but, discounting the
tendency of the Spaniards to discover kings, emperors, and ruling
and subjugated provinces, we may guess that the tribes were allied
and on terms of perfect equality. Later we find the Chiaha and
Kawita maintaining just such an alliance. Ranjel says:

In the mosque, or house of worship, of Talimeco there were breastplates like corse-
lets and headpieces made of rawhide, the hair stripped off; and also very good shields.
This Talimeco was a village holding extensive sway; and this house of worship was on
a high mound and much revered. The caney, or house of the chief, was very large,
high, and broad, all decorated above and below with very fine, handsome mats, ar-
ranged so skilfully that all these mats appeared to be a single one; and, marvellous
as it seems, there was not a cabin that was not covered with mats. This people has
many very fine fields and a pretty stream and a hill covered with walnuts, oak trees,
pines, live oaks, and groves of liquid amber, and many cedars.‘

Garcilasso is the only other chronicler who has much to say of
Talimeco, or who even mentions its name. He says:

Both sides of the road, from the camp to this town, were covered with trees, of which
a part bore fruit, and it seemed as though they promenaded through an orchard, so
that our men arrived with pleasure and without difficulty at Talomeco, which they
found abandoned on account of the pest. Talomeco is a beautiful town, and quite
noted, as it was the residence of the caciques. It is upon a small eminence near the
river, and consists of five hundred well-built houses. That of the chief is elevated
above the town, and is seen from a distance. It is also larger, stronger, and more
agreeable than the others. Opposite this house is the temple, where are the coffins
of the lords of the province. [tis filled with riches, and built in a magnificent manner.”

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, U1, pp. 98, 101. 8 Bourne, op. cit., p. 101.
2 Garcilasso, in Shipp, De Sotoand Florida, p. 362. 4Tbid., pp. 101-102.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 169

Garcilasso then devotes an entire chapter to a description of this
temple, which, though evidently exaggerated, doubtless is true in
outline.’ It is questionable whether these Chiaha belonged originally
to the Yamasee proper or were one of the peoples of Guale. Prob-
ably the English trader spoke only in a general way, however, and we
are not justified in drawing any other than a general inference as to
the ancient location of the tribe. We know nothing of the date when
they settled among the Lower Creeks, except that it was before the
year 1715, We find them among the Creek towns on Ocmulgee
River on some of the early maps, such as the Moll map of 1720 and a
map in Homann’s atlas of date 1759, the information contained in
which evidently antedates the Yamasee war (see also pl. 3).

In 1715, however, nearly all of the Lower Creeks moved over to the
Chattahoochee, the Chiaha among them. On later maps the Chiaha
appear on Chattahoochee River, sometimes under the name “ Achitia,”
between the Okmulgee on the north and a part of the Yuchi known as
the Hoglogees on the south. They seem to have been numerous, and
Adair mentions ‘‘Cha-hah”’ among his six principal Creek towns.2. In
1761 the ‘‘Chehaws, ’’ Osochi, and Okmulgee, called collectively “point
towns,’’ were assigned to the traders George Mackay andJames Hewitt,
along with the Hitchiti.* Bartram states that he crossed the Chat-
tuhoochee ‘at the point towns Chehaw and Usseta (Kasihta).
“These towns,”’ he adds, “almost join each other, yet speak two
languages, as radically different perhaps as the Muscogulge and
Chinese.’’ *

Hawkins (1799) has the following description:

Che-au-hau, called by the traders Che-haws, is just below, and adjoining Oose-oo-che,
on a flat of good land. Below the town the river winds round east, then west, making
a neck or point of one thousand acres of canebrake, very fertile, but low, and sub-
ject to be overflowed; the land back of this is level for nearly three miles, with red,
post, and white oak, hickory, then pine forest.

These people have villages on the waters of Flint River; there they have fine stocks
of cattle, horses, and hogs, and they raise corn, rice, and potatoes in great plenty.

The following are the villages of this town:

Ist. Au-muc-cul-le (pour upon me) is on a creek of that name, which joins on the
right side of Flint River, forty-five miles below Timothy Barnard’s. It is sixty feet
wide, and the main branch of Kitch-o-foo-ne, which it joins three miles from the river;
the village is nine miles up the creek;? the land is poor and flat, with limestone springs
in the neighborhood; the swamp is cypress in hammocks, with some water oak and
hickory; the pine land is poor with ponds and wire grass; they have sixty gun men in
the village; it is in some places well fenced; they have cattle, hogs, and horses, and a
fine range for them, and raise corn, rice, and potatoes in great plenty.

! Garcilasso, in Shipp, De Soto, and Florida, pp. 362-366.
2 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257.
3 Ga. Col. Docs., vm, p. 522.

4 Bartram, Travels, p. 456.
* Elsewhere he says “15 miles up the creek. ’’—Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls.,1x, p. 172.

1770 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

2d. O-tel-le-who-yau-nau (hurricane town) is six miles below Kitch-o-foo-ne, on
the right bank of Flint River, with pine barren on both sides;! they have twenty
families in the village, which is fenced; and they have hogs, cattle, and horses; they
plant the small margins near the mouth of a little creek. This village is generally
named as belonging to Che-au-hau, but they are mixed with Oose-oo-ches ”

In notes taken in 1797 the same writer mentions a small Chiaha
settlement on Flint River, 3 miles below ‘‘ Large Creek,’’ and 9 miles
above Hotalgihuyana.’

Another Chiaha settlement is referred to in the following terms:

Che-au-hoo-che (little che-au-hau) is one mile and a half west from Hit-che-tee, in

the pine forest, near Au-he-gee; a fine little creek, called at its junction with the
river, Hit-che-tee; they begin to fence and have lately built a square.*

When the Creeks were removed to Oklahoma the Chiaha estab-
lished themselves in the extreme northeastern corner of the new
Creek territory, where they made a square ground on Adams Creek.
This was later given up, but it was restored for a period after the
Civil War. It is now altogether abandoned, and the Chiaha them-
selves are rapidly losing their identity m the mass of the population.
It is said that most of the true Chiaha are gone and that those that
are now so called have been brought in from outside—by marriage
presumably. Even before the Creek war many Chiaha had gone to
Florida, and afterwards the numbers there were very greatly aug-
mented. At the present day there is a square ground in the northern
part of the old Seminole Nation named Chiaha, but the different
elements among the Seminole have fused so completely that in
only a few cases can they be separated. The name is little more
than a convenient term, a historical vestige applied after all sub-
stance has departed.

We have still to say a word regarding the Chiaha whom De Soto
found in the mountains—those to whom the name was first applied.
This seems to have been a powerful nation by itself in his time, for
he learned of it while still at Cofitachequi. The Fidalgo of Elvas
says:

The natives [of Cofitachequi] were asked if they had knowledge of any great lord
farther on, to which they answered, that twelve days’ travel thence was a province
called Chiaha, subject to a chief of Coca.®

The statement regarding subjection may be taken to indicate some
kind of alliance, nothing more. De Soto reached this place June

1 Tn notes taken two years earlier Hawkins mentions two towns of this name, or rather two town sites
7 miles apart on Flint River,and clearly indicates that the people had occupied them in succession.—
Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 173.

2 Hawkins, Sketch, in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1, pt.1, pp. 63-64; Ix, p. 172. The second of these branches
long maintained an independent existence. It is mentioned by the Spanish officer, Manuel Garcia in
1800 (copy of Diary in Newberry Lib., Ayer Coll.), and by Young (see p. 409).

3 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 173.

4 Ibid., m1, p. 64.

® Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 68.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 1 al

5, 1540, and left it on the 28th. Ranjel mentions the rather interest-
ing fact that here the explorers first encountered fenced villages.!
In 1566 Juan Pardo penetrated from the fort at Santa Elena as far
north as the Cheraw country at the head of Broad River and built a
fort there, which he named Fort San Juan. He returned to Santa
Elena the same year, leaving a sergeant named Moyano in charge.’
In 1567 Moyano, acting in accordance with instructions, set out
from Fort San Juan and marched westward until he came to Chiaha,
where he built another fort and awaited Pardo. Pardo left Fort
San Felipe at Santa Elena September 1, reached Chiaha, and passed
beyond it ito the country of the Upper Creeks; but, hearing that a
great army of Indians was assembling to oppose him, he returned
to Chiaha, strengthened the fort which Moyano had built, and,
leaving a garrison there consisting of a corporal and 30 soldiers,
returned to Santa Elena.

Vandera, in his enumeration of the places which Pardo had visited,
speaks of Chiaha as “‘a rich and extensive country, a broad land,
surrounded by beautiful rivers. All around this place there are, at
distances of one, two, and three leagues, more or less, many smaller
places all surrounded by rivers. There are leagues and leagues of
plenty (bendicion), with such great quantities of fine grapes and
many medlar-trees; in short, a country for angels.’’’

Pardo also left a garrison, consisting of a corporal and 12 soldiers,
at a place called Cauchi. These posts, along with the one among
the Cheraw, lasted for a time but were ultimately destroyed by the
people among whom they had been placed. This is the last we
hear of a Chiaha so far to the north. When the veil of obscurity
which covered these regions for more than a hundred years after
this time is again lifted they are found only in the south on the
Ocmulgee and Chattahoochee. Now, since, according to the testi-
mony of the English trader already quoted, the Chiaha among the
Lower Creeks had come from the Yamasee, are we to suppose that
these northern Chiaha had in the interval first jomed the Yamasee
and then moved back to the Ocmulgee and Chattahoochee, or did
they join the Chiaha whom I have indicated as probably already
existing among the Yamasee after they had retired westward? On
this pomt our information is almost entirely wanting. There are,
however, a few indications. that there may have been during all
this period a body of Chiaha among the Upper Creeks separate
from those whose history we have already traced, in which case we
must assume that they did not unite with their relatives before

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, nl, p. 108.

2 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, pp. 465-473, 477-480.

3 Vanderain Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, pp. 484-485

4 Ibid.; also Lowery, Span. Settl., 0, pp. 274-276, 284-286, 294-297.

Rae) BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Ruut 73

they emigrated west of the Mississippi, if at all. One of these indi-
cations is the name ‘‘Chiaha’’ applied by Coxe to the Tallapoosa
River,! another the name of a creek in Talladega County, Alabama,
Chehawhaw Creek, known to have borne it as far back as the
end of the eighteenth century,? and a third the enumeration of
two bodies of Upper Creek Indians in the census of 1832 under names
which appear to be intended to represent the name of this tribe.’
One of these is given as ‘‘Chehaw”’ with 126 people and the other as
“Chearhaw” with 306. This is greater than the combined population
of the Chiaha and Hotalgihuyana towns among the Lower Creeks,
and it is difficult to see how they could have persisted as a distinct
people for such a long period without separate notice. While there
are no Upper Creek Chiaha now there seems to be a tradition of such
a body as having existed in former times; and if so, we may consider
it almost certain that they were descendants of those whom De Soto
and Pardo encountered at the very dawn of American history.

THE HITCHITI

Hitchiti among the Creeks was considered the head or ‘‘mother”’
of a group of Lower Creek towns which spoke closely related
languages distinct from Muskogee. This group included the Sawokhi,
Okmulgee, Oconee, Apalachicola, and probably the Chiaha, a
their duals, and all of these egies called themselves Atcik-ha’ta,
words said by Gatschet to signify ‘‘white heap (of ashes).’’* If
this interpretation could be relied upon we might suppose that the
name referred to the ash heap near each square ground, but it is
doubtful. Gatschet states that the name Hitchiti was derived from
a creek of the name which flows into the Chattahoochee, and explains
it by the Creek word dhi’tcita, ‘to look up (the stream).’’* This in-
terpretation would be entitled to considerable respect, since it prob-
ably came from Judge G. W. Stidham, a very intelligent Hitchiti,
from whom Gatschet obtained much of his information regarding
this people, were it not that history shows that the name belonged to
the tribe before it settled upon the Chattahoochee. In the follow-
ing origin myth, related to the writer by Jackson Lewis, another
meaning is assigned to it, butit is probably an ex post facto explana-
tion. It is more likely that there was some connection with the
general term Alte the “hata.

1 Coxe, Carolana, map.

2 Hawkins’s Viatory MS., Lib. Cong.

3 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist. sess., pp. 264-265, 307-309; these ‘‘ Upper Cheehaws”’ are also mentioned
in a volume of treaties between the U. S. A. and the Several Indian Tribes from 1778 to 1837, pp. 68-69,
and, according to aletter dated June 17, 1796, their chiefs took part in a meeting at Coleraine (MS., Lib.
Cong.), though there is some reason to think that part of them were Natchez.

4 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg.,1, p. 77.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 173

The origin of the Hitchiti is given in various ways, but this is what I have heard
regarding them. The true name of these people was A’tcik ha’ta. They claim that
they came to some place where the sea was narrow and frozen over. Crossing upon the
ice they traveled from place to place toward the east until they reached the Atlantic
Ocean. They traveled to see from where the sun came. Now they found themselves
blocked by the ocean and, being tired, they lingered along the coast for some days.
The women and children went down on the beach to gather shells and other things
that were beautiful to look at. They were shown to the old men who said, ‘‘These are
pretty things, and we are tired and cannot proceed farther on account of the ocean,
which has intercepted us. We will stop and rest here.”’ They took the beautiful
shells, pebbles, etc., which the women and children had brought up and made rattles,
and the old men said, ‘‘ Inasmuch as we cannot go farther we will try to find some way
of enjoying ourselves and stop where we now are.” They amused themselves, using
those rattles as they did so, and while they were there on the shore with them people
came across the water to visit them. These were the white people, and the Indians
treated them hospitably, and at that time they were on very friendly terms with each
other. The white people disappeared, however, and when they did so they left a keg
of something which we now know was whisky. A cup was left with this, and the
Indians began pouring whisky into this cup and smelling of it, all being much pleased
with the odor. Some went so far as to drink a little. They became intoxicated and
began to reel and stagger around and butt each other with their heads. Then the
white people came back and the Indians began trading peltries, etc., for things
which the white people had.

Then the Muskogees, who claim to have emerged from the navel of the earth some-
where out west near the Rocky Mountains, came to the place where the Hitchiti were
living. The Muskogee were very warlike, and the Hitchiti concluded it would be
best to make friends with them and become a part of them. Ever since they have
been together as one people. Hitciti is the Muskogee word meaning ‘‘to see,” and
was given to them because they went to see from whence the sun came. So their
name was changed from A’tcik-ha’ta. The two people became allied somewhere
in Florida.

Gatschet says that some Hitchiti Indians claimed that their an-
cestors had fallen from the sky. Chicote and Judge Stidham, how-
ever, told him the following story:

Their ancestors first appeared in the country by coming out of a canebrake or reed
thicket near the seacoast. They sunned and dried their children during four days,
then set out; arrived at a lake and stopped there. Some thought it was the sea, but it

was a lake. They set out again, traveled up a stream and settled there for a per-
manency.!

The origin on the seacoast and the migration upstream suggest
that this last myth may have belonged to the Sawokli.

At one time the Hitchiti were probably the most important tribe in
southern Georgia and their language the prevailing speech in that
region from the Chattahoochee River to the Atlantic Ocean. Never-
theless the true Muskogee entered at such an early period that we
can not say we have historical knowledge of a time when the Hitchiti
were its sole inhabitants.

! Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, pp. 77-78.

174 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The first appearance of the Hitchiti tribe in written history is in the
De Soto chronicles, under the name Ocute! or Ocuti.2-_ That the Ocute
were identical with the later Hitchiti is strongly indicated, if not
proved, by the following line of argument. The name Ocute appears
in a few of the earlier Spanish authorities only, but much later there
is mention of a Lower Creek tribe, called on the De Crenay map
Aéquité,? and in the French census of 1760, Aeykite.*| There is évery
reason to believe that we have here the Ocute of De Soto; certainly
no name recorded from the region approximates it as closely. Now,
the De Crenay map was drawn in 1733, shortly after the Yamasee
war, and the data it contains would apply to the period immediately
following that war. Although apparently located on the Flint, the
position of Aéquité is farther downstream than any of the other
Creek towns on the map. Turning to the English maps of the same
epoch we find that, with the exception of the Apalachicola, who
were for a time at the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint,
Hitchiti was at that period the southernmost town of all. This by
itself is not conclusive, because the arrangement of towns on this
particular part of the De Crenay map (pl. 5) seems unreliable. Turn-
ing to the census of 1760, however, we find the Lower Creek towns
laid out in regular order from north to south, the distance of each
from Fort Toulouse being marked in leagues. Now, when we com-
pare this list with the later arrangement of towns exhibited by the
Early map of 18185 (pl. 9) we obtain the following result:

CENSUS OF 1760 EARLY MAP

Kao ulbas eee Sa eee a es = see ae Cowetau.
Cowetau Tal-la-has-see.

Ghaouaklé 2s. 25-39 oe soe cee ees
Rachetas-o5: © ss..tes ccs e aoe eeee ees Kussetau.
Ouvoutchis™. 82. asst ote ese ee Uchee.
Quchoutchisete. oe tee eee ee ae Osachees.
Moehiahas: <o.s-isj0ce cca eee soda Che-au-choo-chee.
ING VKILO i). ine cin ores ye aoe Se os eee Hitch-e-tee.
Anpalatchikcolis: 22 i.) soc e coeds aelse Pal-la-choo-chee.
Olkonis ees rae, Shs esis cs eee ee oe eee Oconee.
Omolqiliets. s5.-2. 1.2522. nates seule
Choothlos eesses-lecs ss. Be Sau-woo-ga-loo-chee.
Ghoothlotchyc 20:5 s..\.:98 eee bee e aaa Sau-woo-ga-loo-chee.
Woulalashe sesene toc -.. 2. stare ae gene Eu-ta-lau (properly Eu-fa-lau).
Tohoualasteseecesene .. oe. ee eae Hee
Oeyakbe. seeeeree tt see Ais le eee ESS See Oke-te-yo-con-ne.

The correspondences between the two, it will be noted, are very
marked. They become still closer when we supplement the Early

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 56; m1, p. 90. 5 In this I have omitted the Okfuskee settlements
2 Thid., 1, p. 11. higher up the stream, which are not considered by
3 Plate 5; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190. the French enumerators.

4 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 96.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 175

map with other authorities. Che-au-choo-chee is laid down on the
Early map just opposite Hitchiti town, but for some reason or other
the town of Chiaha itself was overlooked, and Hawkins describes it
exactly where the French census places it, just below Osochi (Ouchou-
tchis). Instead of the first Sau-woo-ga-loo-chee he also has Sau-woo-
ge-lo, for which Choothlo is certainly intended. Tchoualas is ‘also
probably intended for Sawokli or Sawoklo, and in position it cor-
responds to a town called Kawaigi, said to be a Sawokli offshoot.
Oeyakbe means ‘“‘water (or river) fork’”’ in Muskogee and Oke-te-yo-
con-ne, “zigzag stream land,’ in Hitchiti. The same town is probably
intended by them. In only three cases, Chaouaklé, Omolquet, and
Tchoualas, does the census of 1760 contain names not represented
on the Early map, and in only one case, Cowetau Tal-la-has-see, does
the Early map contain a name not represented in the census of
1760. As this last was an outvillage of Cowetau its omission is
readily explained. Aeykite, like Hitch-e-tee, is placed between
Chiaha and Apalachicola, and with the exception of Che-au-choo-chee,
which was of course only an outsettlement of Chiaha, and the Westo
town, which disappeared at an early date, no town is laid down on
any other map known to me between the two aforesaid places. In
fact, the distance between them is not great. If Aeykite is not
identical with Hitch-e-tee we must not only assume a distinct town
of the name not otherwise explained, but we must assume that
Hitchiti is the only important town omitted from the French census,
a rather unlikely happening. To the writer the conclusion seems
quite overwhelming that Aeykite refers to the Hitchiti town, and if
that be the case Ocute probably does also. The latest use of this
particular term seems to be by Manuel Garcia (1800) when it appears
in the form ‘‘Oakjote.”’! The Spanish census of 1738 has an inter-
mediate form ‘“‘ Ayjichiti.’’!

Assuming, then, that Ocute and Aeykite are synonyms for Hitchiti,
we will now proceed to trace the history of this tribe.

Elvas says:

The governor [De Soto] set out [from Achese] on the first day of April [1540] and
advanced through the country of the chief, along up a river, the shores of which were
very populous. On the fourth he went through the town of Altamaca, and on the
tenth arrived at Ocute.?

And elsewhere he adds:

The land of Ocute is more strong and fertile than the rest, the forest more open,
and it has very good fields along the margins of the rivers.*

Ranjel says that, after passing Altamaha they met a chief named
Camumo, who, along with others, was a subject of ‘‘a great chief

! Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. 3 Tbid., p. 220.
2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 56.

176 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

whose name was Ocute.’”’ The chief of Ocute furnished bearers
and provisions to the Spaniards, though apparently not without
protest, and the latter set up a wooden cross in his village as an
entering wedge to conversion.1 Ocute would seem to have been the
province called Cofa by Garcilasso, which he describes as “suitable for
cattle, very productive in corn, and very delightful.’”

Our next glimpse of Ocute is in the testimony given by Gaspar
de Salas with respect to his expedition from St. Augustine to Tama
in the year 1596.

The greater part of this testimony will be introduced in discussing
the Tamali tribe. After leaving Tama the narrative continues:

At one day’s journey from Tama they came upon the village of Ocute, where they
were very well received by its cacique, who made them many presents, the women
bringing their shawls, which he calls aprons, which look like painted leather.* Some
of them say that they have been in New Spain and have or are imitating their dress.
As they wished to go on farther, the cacique of Ocute tried very earnestly to dissuade
them from it, weeping over it with them, as he said that if they went any farther
inland the Indians there would kill them, because a long time ago, which must have
been when Soto passed there, taking many people on horseback, they killed many of
them; how much more would they kill them who were but few? This is the reason
why they did not go ahead, but returned from there. They likewise heard the
Indians of that village as well as the Salchiches say that at four days’ journey from
there, and after passing a very high mountain where, when the sun rose, there seemed
to be a big fire, on the farther side of it lived people who wore their hair clipped (cut),
and that the pine trees were cut down with hatchets, and that it seems to the witness
that such signs can only apply to Spaniards. He [the witness] says that this country
[Tama, etc.] seems to him to be very rich, or at least sufficiently so to produce any
kind of grain, even if it be wheat, and has many meadows and pastures for cattle, and
its rivers have sweet water in places, and that it seems to him that if there were any-
body who knew how to find and wash gold in those rivers it could surely be found.

The first appearance of the Hitchiti under the name by which we
know them best is after South Carolina had been settled, when it
occurs in documents as that of a Lower Creek town, and on the
maps of that period it is laid down on Ocmulgee River below the
town of the Coweta. From the Mitchell map this site is identifiable
as the ‘‘Ocmulgee old fields”’ on the site of the present Macon, which
is in agreement with a legend reported by Gatschet to the effect that
the Hitchiti were ‘‘the first to settle at the site of Okmulgee town, an
ancient capital of the confederacy.” *

William Bartram thus describes the Ocmulgee old fields as they
appeared in his time:

1 Bourne, op. cit., pp. 90-91.

2 Garcilasso in Shipp, De Soto and Florida, p. 344.
3 He says carpeta, which in Spanish is a table cover, a portfolio, or any leather case.
4 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 144-145. Translated by Mrs. F. Bandelier.

5 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 78.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS i yine

About seventy or eighty miles above the confluence of the Oakmulge and Ocone,
the trading path, from Augusta to the Creek Nation, crosses these fine rivers, which
are there forty miles apart. On the east bank of the Oakmulge this trading road runs
nearly two miles through ancient Indian fields, which are called the Oakmulge fields;
they are the rich low lands of the river. On the heights of these low lands are yet
visible monuments, or traces, of an ancient town, such as artificial mounds or terraces,
squares and banks, encircling considerable areas. Their old fields and planting land
extended up and down the river, fifteen or twenty miles from this site."

As Bartram states that the Creeks had stopped here after their im-
migration from the west, the Hitchiti may not have been in occupancy
always. On the other hand, Bartram may have inferred a Creek
occupancy from the tradition that the confederacy had there been
founded, but this may really have had reference to a compact of
some kind between the Hitchiti and the invading Creeks, irrespective
of the land actually held by each tribe.

After the Yamasee war the Hitchiti moved across to Chattahoochee
River with most of the other Lower Creeks, first to a point low down on
that river, later higher up between the Chiaha and Apalachicola.’
In 1761 they were assigned to the traders, George Mackay and James
Hewitt, along with the Point towns.’ Their name occurs in the
lists of both Swan and Bartram.‘ In 1797 the trader there was
William Grey.’ Hawkins (1799) gives the following description of
the Hitchiti town and its branch villages:

Hit-che-tee is on the left bank of Chat-to-ho-che, four miles below Che-au-hau;
they have a narrow strip of good land bordering on the river, and back of this it rises
into high, poor land, which spreads off flat. In approaching the town on thisside there
is no rise, but a great descent to the town flat; on the right bank of the river the land
is level and extends out for two miles; is of thin quality; the growth is post oak, hick-
ory, and pine, all small; then pine barren and ponds.

The appearance about this town indicates much poverty and indolence; they have
no fences; they have spread out into villages, and have the character of being honest
and industrious; they are attentive to the rights of their white neighbors, and no
charge of horse stealing from the frontiers has been substantiated against them. The
villages are:

Ist. Hit-che-too-che (Little Hit-che-tee), a small village of industrious people, set-
tled on both sides of Flint River, below Kit-cho-foo-ne; they have good fences, cattle,
horses, and hogs, in a fine range, and are attentive to them.

2d. Tut-tal-lo-see (fowl), on a creek of that name, twenty miles west from Hit-che-
too-che. This is a fine creek on a bed of limestone; it is a branch of Kitch-o-foo-ne;
the land bordering on the creek, and for eight or nine miles® in the direction towards
Hit-che-too-che, is level, rich, and fine for cultivation, with post and black oak,
hickory, dogwood and pine. The villagers have good worm fences, appear indus-
trious, and have large stocks of cattle, some hogs and horses; they appear decent and

1 Bartram, Travels, pp. 52-53. 4 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262; Bartram,
2 See p. 174. Travels, p. 462.
3 Ga. Col. Does., vim, p. 522. 5 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 171.

6 The Lib. of Cong. MS. has ‘‘six or eight.’’

148061°—22 12

178 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 73

orderly, and are desirous of preserving a friendly intercourse with their neighbors;
they have this year, 1799, built a square.!

Manuel Garcia calls this latter village “‘Totolosehache.”? According
to an anonymous writer quoted by Gatschet there were, about 1820,
six “Fowl towns,” Cahalli hatchi, old Tallahassi, Atap’halgi, Allik
hadshi, Ketatulga, and Mikasuki.? Most of these will be referred to
again when we come to speak of Seminole towns. The census of
1832 mentions a Hitchiti village called Hihaje.

After their removal to the west the Hitchiti were placed in about the
center of the Creek Nation, near what is now Hitchita station, and
their descendants have remained there and about Okmulgee up to
the present time. A portion migrated to Florida and after the
removal maintained a square ground for a time in the northern
part of the Seminole Nation, Oklahoma. Some persons in this
neighborhood still preserve the language.

THE OKMULGEE

This tribe also belonged to the Hitchiti group. The name refers
to the bubbling up of water in a spring, and in Creek it is called
Oiki lako, and Oikewali, signifying much the same thing. The
designation is said to have come originally from a large spring in
Georgia. One of my informants thought that this was near Fort -
Mitchell, but probably it was the same spring from which the Ocmul-
gee River got its name, and this would be the famous ‘‘ Indian Spring”
in Butts County, Georgia. As early maps consulted by me do not
show a town of the name on Ocmulgee River, and as the site of
the Ocmulgee old fields was occupied by Hitchiti, I believe the
Okmulgee were a branch of the Hitchiti, which perhaps left the
town on the Ocmulgee before the main body of the people and
made an independent settlement on Chattahoochee River. There
their nearest neighbors were the Chiaha and Osochi, and the three
together constituted what were sometimes known as “the point
towns” from a point of land made by the river at that place.
Bartram does not give the tribe separate mention, perhaps because
he reckoned them as part of the Chiaha or Osochi. The French
enumeration of 1750 records them as ‘‘ Oemoulké,’’* the French census
of about 1760 as “‘Omolquet,’’*® and the Georgia census of 1761 gives
them as one of “the point towns.’’7 Hawkins omits them from his
sketch, but mentions them in his notes taken in 1797, where he says:

1 Hawkins’ Sketch, in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, pt. 1, pp. 64-65. Hitchiti were also on Chickasawhatchee
Creek.—Hawkins, in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 174.

2 Ayer. Coll., Newberry Lib.

3 Mise. Coll., Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 413.

4 See pp. 406-412.

5 MSS., Ayer Coll.

§ Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 96.

7 Ga. Col. Does., VIM, p. 522.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 179

Ocmulgee Village, 7 miles [below Hotalgihuyana]. There is a few families, the
remains of the Ocmulgee people who formerly resided at the Ocmulgee fields on
Ocmulgee River; lands poor, pine barren on both sides; the swamp equally poor and
sandy; the growth dwarf scrub brush, evergreens, among which is the Cassine.’’!

The mouth of Kinchafoonee creek was 8 miles below.

Manuel Garcia mentions their chief as one of several Lower Creek
chiefs with whom he had a conference in the year 1800. He spells
the name ‘“Okomulgue.’”’? Morse (1822) includes them in a list
of towns copied from a manuscript by Capt. Young. They were
then located east of, Flint River, near the Hotalgihuyana, and
numbered 220. They are wanting from the census rolls of 1832,
but perhaps formed one of the two Osochi towns mentioned, each
of which is given a very large population. On their removal west
of the Mississippi they settled in the northeastern corner of the new
Creek territory, near the Chiaha. They were among the first to
give up their old square ground and to adopt white manners and
customs. Probably in consequence of this progress they furnished
three chiefs to the Creek Nation—Joe Perryman, Legus Perryman,
and Pleasant Porter—and a number of leading men besides.

THE OCONEE

In addition to two groups of Muskhogean people bearing this name‘
it should be noticed that it was popularly applied by the whites to a
Cherokee town, properly called Ukwft’/nt (or Ukwi’nf),> but the
similarity may be merely a coincidence. Of the two Creek groups
mentioned one seems to be associated exclusively with the Florida
tribes, while the second, when we first hear of it, was on the Georgia
river which still bears its name. The first reference to either
appears to be in a report of the Timucua missionary, Pareja, dated
1602. He mentions the ‘‘Ocony,’’ three days’ journey from San
Pedro, among a number of tribes among which there were Chris-
tians or which desired missionaries.* In a letter dated April 8, 1608,
Ibarra speaks of ‘‘the chief of Ocone which marches on the province
of Tama.’’*® This might apply to either Oconee division. The mis-
sion lists of 1655 contain a station called Santiago de Ocone, de-
scribed as an island and said to be 30 leagues from St. Augustine.
As it was certainly not southward of the colonial capital it would
seem to have been near the coast to the north, according to the dis-
tance given, in the neighborhood of Jekyl Island. At the very same
time there was another Oconee mission among the Apalachee Indians
called San Francisco de Apalache in the list of 1655; it is given in the

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 173. 4 See p. 112.
2 Copy MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. 619th Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p. 541.
3 Morse, Rept. on Ind. Aff., p. 364. ‘Lowery, MSS,

180 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

list of 1680 as San FranciscodeOconi.'! This group probably remained
with the rest of the Apalachee towns and followed their fortunes.

The main body of the Oconee was located, when first known to
Englishmen, on Oconee River, about 4 miles south of the present Mil-
ledgeville, Georgia, just below what was called the Rock Landing.
In a letter, dated March 11, 1695, Gov. Laureano de Torres Ayala tells
of an expedition consisting of 400 Indians and 7 Spaniards sent
against the ‘“‘Cauetta, Oconi, Cassista, and Tiquipache”’ in retaliation
for attacks made upon the Spanish Indians. About 50 persons were
captured in one of these towns, but the others were found abandoned.’
On the Lamhatty map they appear immediately west of a river which
seems to be the Flint, but the topography of this map is not to be
relied on. In the text accompanying, the name is given as ‘‘Oppo-
nys.’’® Almost all that is known of later Oconee history is contained
in the following extract from Bartram:

Our encampment was fixed on the site of the old Ocone town, which, about sixty
years ago, was evacuated by the Indians, who, finding their situation disagreeable
from its vicinity to the white people, left it, moving upwards into the Nation or
Upper Creeks,‘ and there built a town; but that situation not suiting their roving
disposition, they grew sickly and tired of it, and resolved to seek an habitation more
agreeable to their minds. They all arose, directing their migration southeastward
towards the seacoast; and in the course of their journey, observing the delightful
appearance of the extensive plains of Alachua and the fertile hills environing it, they
sat down and built a town on the banks of a spacious and beautiful lake, at a small
distance from the plains, naming this new town Cuscowilla; this situation pleased them,
the vast deserts, forests, lake, and savannas around affording abundant range of the
best hunting ground for bear and deer, their favourite game. But although this situa-
tion was healthy and delightful to the utmost degree, affording them variety and
plenty of every desirable thing in their estimation, yet troubles and afflictions found
them out. This territory, to the promontory of Florida, was then claimed by the
Tomocas, Utinas, Caloosas, Yamases, and other remnant tribes of the ancient Floridians,
and the more Northern refugees, driven away by the Carolinians, now in alliance and
under the protection of the Spaniards, who, assisting them, attacked the new settle-
ment and for many years were very troublesome; but the Alachuas or Ocones being
strengthened by other emigrants and fugitive bands from the Upper Creeks fi. e., the
Creeks proper], with whom they were confederated, and who gradually established —
other towns in this low country, stretching a line of settlements across the isthmus,
extending from the Alatamaha to the bay of Apalache; these uniting were at length
able to face their enemies and even attack them in their own settlements; and in the
end, with the assistance of the Upper Creeks, their uncles, vanquished their enemies
and destroyed them, and then fell upon the Spanish settlements, which also they
entirely broke up.°®

We know that the removal of this tribe from the Oconee River took
place, like so many other removals in the region, just after the Ya-

1See p. 110.

2 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 225.

3 Am. Anthrop., n. s. vol. X, p. 571.

4 Bartram calls all of the Creeks, Upper Creeks, and the Seminole of Florida, Lower Creeks.
5 Bartram, Travels, pp. 378-379.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 181

masee outbreak of 1715, and the movement into Florida about 1750.
Their chief during most of this period was known to the whites as
“The Cowkeeper.’’ Although Bartram represents the tribe as having
gone in a body, we know that part of them remained on the Chatta-
hoochee much later, for they appear in the assignments to traders
for 1761,? and in Hawkins’s Sketch of 1799, while Bartram himself
includes the town in his list as one of those on the Apalachicola or
Chattahoochee River.‘ The list of towns given in 1761 includes a
big and a little Oconee town, the two having together 50 hunters.
Their trader was William Frazer. Hawkins describes their town as
follows:

O-co-nee is six miles below Pa-la-chooc-le, on the left bank of Chat-to-ho-che. It is
a small town, the remains of the settlers of O-co-nee; they formerly lived just below
the rock landing, and gave name to that river; they are increasing in industry, making
fences, attending to stock, and have some level land moderately rich; they have a few
hogs, cattle, and horses.4

They are not represented in the census of 1832, so we must sup-
pose either that they had all gone to Florida by that time or that
they had united with some other people. Bartram’s narrative gives,
not merely the history of the Oconee, but a good account also of the
beginnings of the Seminole as distinct from the Creeks. When we
come to a discussion of Seminole history we shall find that the
Oconee played a most important part in it, in fact that the history
of the Seminole is to a considerable extent a continuation of the
history of the Oconee.

THE TAMABI

It is in the highest degree probable that this town is identical with
the Toa, Otoa, or Toalli of the De Soto chroniclers, the -lli of the
last form representing presumably the Hitchiti plural-a#. Be that as
it may, there can be little question regarding the identity of Tamali
with the town of Tama, which appears in Spanish documents of the
end of the same century and the beginning of the seventeenth.? In
1598 Mendez de Canco, governor of Florida, writes that he plans to
establish a post at a place ‘‘which is called Tama, where I have
word there are mines and stones, and it is a very fertile land
abounding in food and fruits, many like those of Spain.” It
was sald to be 40 leagues from St. Augustine.* In a later letter,
dated February, 1600, is given the testimony of a soldier named
Gaspar de Salas, who had visited this town in the year 1596. He
undertook this expedition in company with the Franciscan fathers,
Pedro Fernandez de Chosas and Francisco de Veras. He found the

1 See pp. 398-399. ‘ Bartram, Travels, p. 462.

*Ga. Col. Does., vim, p. 522. § See p. 12.
4 Ga, Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 65. *Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 138.

182 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY . [BULL. 73

town to be farther off than the governor had supposed—‘ about 50
leagues, little more or less,’ from St. Augustine. They reached it
from Guale—that is, from St. Catherines Island. De Salas states
that

It took them eight days to go from Guale to Tama, and seven of those eight days
led through deserted land, which was very poor, and on arriving at Tama they found
abundance of food, like corn, beans, and much venison and turkeys! and other fowl,
and a great abundance of fish, as, for instance sturgeon, which they call ‘‘sollo real”
in Spain; and likewise much fruit, as big grapes of as nice a taste as in Spain, and?
white plums like the ‘‘siruelade monje,” and cherries and watermelons? and other
fruit.

That all around the said village of Tama and neighbouring territory there is very
good brown soil, which, when it rains, clings to one’s feet like marl. There are in
certain regions many barren hills where he saw many kinds of minerals. In several
of these parts he and the two monks gathered of those stones those which seemed to
them to contain metals and which were on the surface, because they did not have
anything with which they could dig, and that he, the said witness, brought some of
them, pulverised, to the governor and another part to a jeweler who at that time
lived in the city, but who died in those days past, and that he made assays of them
and told this witness that where those had been found there existed silver for they
were the slags and scum of such a mine, and if they should find the vein of this mineral
it would certainly prove to be a rich mine. About all this the said governor would
certainly be better informed, for he, too, was told about it and made the experiment
with the said jeweler. And near those mines grew an herb which is highly treasured
by the Indians as a medicinal plant and to heal wounds, and they call it “‘guitamo
real.’’? On those same hills and on the banks of big streams they gathered many
crystalisations and even fine crystals.*

Ocute was one day’s journey beyond this placé. On their return
they took a more southerly route, better and not so devoid of human
habitation, since they were only two days away from settlements.
They came first to places called Yufera and Cascangue, and finally
reached the coast at the island of San Pedro (Cumberland Island).°®

In 1606 the chief of Tama was among those who met Governor
Ibarra at Sapelo, which we many assume to have been the most
convenient place on the coast for him to present himself.* The
name, sometimes spelled Thama, appears frequently from this time
on, applied to a province of somewhat indefinite extent m southern
Georgia, and one for which missionaries were needed. No earnest
attempt at its conversion took place, however, until late in the
seventeenth century. In the mission lists of 1680 a station known
as Nuestra Sefiora de la Candelaria de la Tama appears among those

1 Gallinas de papada,

2 Sollo= “‘ pike.’’

3 The watermelon was introduced from Africa; perhaps these were really pumpkins. The word used
is “sandias.”

4 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 144. Translated by Mrs. F. Bandelier,

6 Ibid., p. 145.

6 Ibid., p. 184.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 183

in the Provincia de Apalache, and it is called a ‘new conversion,’”!
The missionary effort was probably instrumental in bringing this
tribe nearer the Apalachee, and such an inference is confirmed by a
letter of 1717 in which reference is made to ‘‘a Christian Indian
named Augustin, of the nation Tama of Apalache.’’? On the De
Crenay map of 1733 the name appears as Tamatlé, and the tribe
is located on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River below all
of the other Creek towns on that stream.* This position is con-
firmed from Spanish sources, particularly from one document in
which the order of Lower Creek towns from south to north is given
as ‘‘Tamaxle, Chalaquilicha, Yufala, Sabacola, Ocone, Apalachicalo,
Ocomulque, Osuche, Chiaja, Casista, Caveta.’’* A Spanish enumera-
tion of Creek towns made in 1738 gives two towns of this name,
‘“Tamaxle el Viejo,” the southernmost of all Lower Creek towns,
and ‘‘Tamaxle nuevo,’’ apparently the northernmost.> The enumera-
tion of 1750 places them between the Hitchiti and the Oconee.‘
Hawkins enumerates them as one of those tribes out of which the
Seminole Nation had been formed.® Since all.of the others men-
tioned by him were still represented among the Lower Creeks it is
probable that this tribe had emigrated in its entirety. Itis wanting in
the lists of Bartram and Swan, and from the census of 1832, but appears
in that contained in Morse’s Report to the Secretary of War (1822),
and also in the diary of Manuel Garcia (1800), where it is given
as a Lower Creek town. It was then on the Apalachicola River,
7 miles above the Ocheese.’ It so appears on the Melish map of
1818-19, where it is called ‘‘Tomathlee-Seminole”’ (pl. 8). These are
the last references to it, and it was probably swallowed up in the
Mikasuki band of Seminole.

It should be observed that the name of this tribe, or a name very
similar, appears twice far to the north in the Cherokee country.
One town bearing it was ‘fon Valley River, a few miles above Murphy,
about the present Tomatola, in Cherokee County, North Carolina.”
The other was ‘‘on Little Tennessee River, about Tomotley ford, a
few miles above Tellico River, in Monroe County, Tennessee.”
Mooney, from whom these quotations are made, adds that the name
does not appear to be Cherokee. This fact should be considered in
connection with a similar north and south. division of the Tuskegee,
Koasati, and Yuchi. Gatschet states definitely that one of these
Cherokee towns was settled by Creek Tamali Indians,’ but this
appears to have been merely a guess on his part.

1 See pp. 110, 323. 6 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., mm, p. 26.

2 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 228. 7 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, 1822, p. 364.

3 Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190. 819th Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p. 534.
4 Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. 9 Ala. Hist. Soc., Mise. Colls., 1, p. 410.

5 Ibid. See p. 143.

184 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The name Tamali suggests the Hitchiti form of the name of a
Creek clan, the Tamalgi, Hitchiti Tamali, and it is possible that
there is historical meaning in this resemblance, but there is just
enough difference between the pronunciations of the two to render
it doubtful.

THE TAMAHITA

In 1673 the Virginia pioneer Abraham Wood sent two white men,
James Needham and Gabriel Arthur, the latter probably an indentured
servant, in company with eight Indians, to explore western Virginia
up to and beyond the mountains. They were turned back at first “‘ by
misfortune and unwillingness of ye Indians before the mountaines
that they should discover beyond them’’; but May 17 they were
sent out again, and on June 25 they met some ‘‘Tomahitans”’ on
their way from the mountains to the Occaneechi, a Siouan tribe.
Some of these came to see Wood, and meanwhile the rest returned to
their own country, along with the two white men and one Appo-
matox Indian. From this point the narrative proceeds as follows:

They jornied nine days from Occhonechee to Sitteree: west and by south, past nine
rivers and creeks which all end in this side ye mountaines and emty themselves into
ye east sea. Sitteree being the last towne of inhabitance and not any path further
untill they came within two days jorney of ye Tomahitans; they travell from thence up
the mountaines upon ye sun setting all ye way, and in foure dayes gett to ye toppe,
some times leading thaire horses sometimes rideing. Ye ridge upon ye topp is not
above two hundred paces over; ye decent better than on thisside. in halfe a day they
came to ye foot, and then levell ground all ye way, many slashes upon ye heads of
small runns. The slashes are full of very great canes and ye water runes to ye north
west. They pass five rivers and about two hundred paces over ye fifth being ye
middle most halfe a mile broad all sandy bottoms, with peble stones, all foardable
and all empties themselves north west, when they travell upon ye plaines, from ye
mountaines they goe downe, for severall dayes they see straged hilles on theire right
hand, as they judge two days journy from them, by this time they have lost all theire
horses but one; not so much by ye badness of the way as by hard travell. not haveing
time to feed. when they lost sight of those hilles they see a fogg or smoke like a cloud
from whence raine falls for severall days on their right hand as they travell still towards
the sun setting great store of game, all along as turkes, deere, elkes, beare, woolfe and
other vermin very tame, at ye end of fiftteen dayes from Sitteree they arive at ye
Tomahitans river, being ye 6th river from ye mountains. this river att ye Tomahitans
towne seemes to run more westerly than ye other five. This river they past in can-
noos ye town being seated in ye other side about foure hundred paces broad above
ye town, within sight, ye horses they had left waded only a small channell swam, they
were very kindly entertained by them, even to addoration in their cerrimonies of
courtesies and a stake was sett up in ye middle of ye towne to fasten ye horse to, and
aboundance of corne and all manner of pulse with fish, flesh and beares oyle for ye
horse to feed upon and a scaffold sett up before day for my two men and Appomat-
tocke Indian that theire people might stand and gaze at them and not offend them
by theire throng. This towne is seated on ye river side, haveing ye clefts of ye river

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 185

on ye one side being very high for its defence, the other three sides trees of two foot
over, pitched on end, twelve foot high, and on ye topps scafolds placed with parrapits
to defend the walls and offend theire enemies which men stand on to fight, many
nations of Indians inhabitt downe this river, which runes west upon ye salts which
they are att waare withe and to that end keepe one hundred and fifty cannoes un-
der yecommand of theire forte. ye leaste of them will carry twenty men, and made
sharpe at both ends like a wherry for swiftness, this forte is foure square; 300: paces
over and ye houses sett in streets, many hornes like bulls hornes lye upon theire dung-
hills, store of fish they have, one sorte they have like unto stoche-fish cured after
that manner. Eight dayes jorny down this river lives a white people which have
long beardes and whiskers and weares clothing, and on some of ye other rivers lives a
hairey people, not many yeares since ye Tomahittans sent twenty men laden with
beavor to ye white people, they killed tenn of them and put ye other tenn in irons,
two of which tenn escaped and one of them came with one of my men to my plantation
as you will understand after a small time of rest one of my men returnes with his horse,
ye Appomatock Indian and 12 Tomahittans, eight men and foure women, one of those
eight is hee which hath been a prisoner with ye white people, my other man remaines
with them untill ye next returne to learne ye language. the 10th of September my
man with his horse and ye twelve Indians arrived at my house praise bee to God, ye
Tomahitans have about sixty gunnes, not such locks as oures bee, the steeles are long
and channelld where ye flints strike, ye prisoner relates that ye white people have a
bell which is six foot over which they ring morning and evening and att that time a
great number of people congregate togather and talkes he knowes not what. they
have many blacks among them. oysters and many other shell-fish, many swine and
cattle. Theire building is brick, the Tomahittans began theire jorny ye 20th of
September intending, God blessing him, at ye spring of ye next yeare to returne with
his companion att which time God spareing me life I hope to give you and some other
friends better satisfaction. !

The greater part of the information contained in this report is
from Needham. Not long afterwards Needham was killed by an
Occaneechi Indian. Arthur, however, was among the Tomahitans.
He escaped the fate of his companion and after several rather
remarkable adventures, if we may trust his own statements, he
returned to the home of his employer in safety and communicated to
him an account of all that had happened. Wood informs us that a
complete statement of everything Arthur told him would be too long
to record, therefore he sets down only the principal points. The
account runs thus:

Ye Tomahittans hasten home as fast as they can to tell ye newes [regarding the mur-
der of Needham]. ye King or chife man not being att home, some of ye Tomahittans
which were great lovers of ye Occheneechees went to put Indian Johns command
in speedy execution and tied Gabriell Arther to a stake and laid heaps of combustible
canes a bout him to burne him, but before ye fire was put too ye King came into ye
towne with a gunn upon his shoulder and heareing of ye uprore for some was with it
and some a gainst it. ye King ran with great speed to ye place, and said who is that
that is goeing to put fire to ye English man. a Weesock borne started up with a fire
brand in his hand said that am I. Ye King forthwith cockt his gunn and shot ye

wesock dead, and ran to Gabriell and with his knife cutt ye thongs that tide him and
had him goe to his house and said lett me see who dares touch him and all ye wesock

1 Alvord and Bidgood, First Explorations Trans-Allegheny Region, pp. 212-214.

186 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 73

children they take are brought up with them as ye lanesaryes are a mongst ye Turkes.
this king came to my house upon ye 21th of June as you will heare in ye following dis-
couerse.

Now after ye tumult was over they make preparation for to manage ye warr for that
is ye course of theire liveing to forage robb and spoyle other nations and the king
commands Gabriell Arther to goe along with a party that went to robb ye Spanyarrd.
promising him that in ye next spring hee him selfe would carry him home to his master,
Gabriell must now bee obedient to theire commands. in ye deploreable condition
hee was in was put in armes, gun, tomahauke, and targett and soe marched a way with
ye company, beeing about fifty. they travelled eight days west and by south as he
guest and came to a town of negroes, spatious and great, but all wooden buildings.
Heare they could not take any thing without being spied. The next day they
marched along by ye side of a great carte path, and about five or six miles as he judgeth
came within sight of the Spanish town, walld about with brick and all brick buildings
within. There he saw ye steeple where in hung ye bell which Mr. Needham gives
relation of and harde it ring in ye eveing. heare they dirst not stay but drew of and
ye next morning layd an ambush in a convenient place neare ye cart path before men-
tioned and there lay allmost seven dayes to steale for theire sustenance. Ye 7th day a
Spanniard in a gentille habitt, accoutered with gunn, sword and pistoll. one of ye
Tomahittans espieing him att a distance crept up to ye path side and shot him to
death. In his pockett were two pieces of gold and a small gold chain. which ye Toma-
hittans gave to Gabriell, but hee unfortunately lost it in his venturing as you shall
heare by yesequell. Here they hasted to ye negro town where they had ye advantage
to meett with a lone negro. After him runs one of the Tomahittans with a dart in his
hand, made with a pice of ye blaide of Needhams sworde, and threw it after ye negro,
struck him thrugh betwine his shoulders soe hee fell downe dead. They tooke from
him some toys. which hung in his eares, and bracelets about his neck and soe returned
as expeditiously as they could to theire owne homes.

They rested but a short time before another party was commanded out a gaine and
Gabrielle Arther was commanded out a gaine, and this was to Porte Royall. Here
hee refused to goe saying those were English men and he would not fight a gainst
his own nation, he had rather be killd. The King tould him they intended noe hurt
to ye English men, for he had promised Needham att his first coming to him that
he would never doe violence a gainst any English more but theire business was to
cut off a town of Indians which lived neare ye English. I but said Gabriell what if
any English be att that towne, a trading, ye King sware by ye fire which they adore
as theire god they would not hurt them soe they marched a way over ye mountains
and came upon ye head of Portt Royall River in six days. There they made per-
riaugers of bark and soe past down ye streame with much swiftness, next coming to a
convenient place of landing they went on shore and marched to ye eastward of ye
south, one whole day and parte of ye night. At lengeth they brought him to ye
sight of an English house, and Gabriell with some of the Indians crept up to ye house
side and lisening what they said, they being talkeing with in ye house, Gabriell
hard one say, pox take such a master that will not alow a servant a bit of meat to eate
upon Christmas day, by that meanes Gabriell knew what time of ye yeare it was, soe
they drew of secretly and hasten to ye Indian town, which was not above six miles
thence. about breake of day stole upon ye towne. Ye first house Gabriell came
too there was an English man. Hee hard him say Lord have mercy upon mee. Ga-
briell said to him runn for thy life. Said hee which way shall I run. Gabriell re-
ployed, which way thou wilt they will not meddle with thee. Soe hee rann and ye
Tomahittans opened and let him pas cleare there they got ye English mans snapsack
with beades, knives and other petty truck, init. They made a very great slaughter
upon the Indians and a bout sun riseing they hard many great guns fired off amongst

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 187

the English. Then they hastened a way with what speed they could and in less
than fourteene dayes arived att ye Tomahittns with theire plunder.

Now ye king must goe to give ye monetons a visit which were his frends, mony
signifing water and ton great in theire language. Gabriell must goe along with him
They gett forth with sixty men and travelled tenn days due north and then arived
at ye monyton towne sittuated upon a very great river att which place ye tide ebbs
and flowes. Gabriell swom in ye river severall times, being fresh water, this is a
great towne and a great number of Indians belong unto it, and in ye same river Mr.
Batt and Fallam were upon the head of it as you read in one of my first jornalls. This
river runes north west and out of ye westerly side of it goeth another very great river
about a days journey lower where the inhabitance are an inumarable company of
Indians, as the monytons told my man which is twenty dayes journey from one end
to ye other of ye inhabitance, and all these are at warr with the Tomahitans. when
they had taken theire leave of ye monytons they marched three days out of thire way
to give a clap to some of that great nation, where they fell on with great courage and
were as couragiously repullsed by theire enimise.

And heare Gabriell received shott with two arrows, one of them in his thigh, which
stopt his runing and soe was taken prisoner, for Indian vallour consists most in theire
heeles for he that can run best is accounted ye best man. These Indians thought this
Gabrill to be noe Tomahittan by ye length of his haire, for ye Tomahittans keepe
theire haire close cut to ye end an enime may not take an advantage to lay hold of
them by it. They tooke Gabriell and scowered his skin with water and ashes, and
when they perceived his skin to be white they made very much of him and admire
att his knife gunn and hatchett they tooke with him. They gave those thing to him
againe. He made signes to them the gun was ye Tomahittons which he had a disire
to take with him, but ye knife and hatchet he gave to ye king. they not knowing
ye use of gunns, the king receved it with great shewes of thankfullness for they had
not any manner of iron instrument that hee saw amongst them whilst he was there
they brought in a fatt bevor which they had newly killd and went to swrynge it.
Gabriell made signes to them that those skins were good a mongst the white people
toward the sun riseing. they would know by signes how many such skins they would
take for such a knife. He told them foure and eight for such a hattchett and made
signes that if they would lett him return, he would bring many things amongst them.
they seemed to rejoyce att it and carried him to a path that carried to ye Tomahittans
gave him Rokahamony for his journey and soe they departed, to be short. when he
came to ye Tomahittans ye king had one short voyage more before hee could bring
in Gabriell and that was downe ye river, they live upon in perriougers to kill hoggs,
beares and sturgion which they did incontinent by five dayes and nights. They
went down ye river and came to ye mouth of ye salts where they could not see land
but the water not above three foot deepe hard sand. By this meanes wee know this
is not ye river ye Spanyards live upon as Mr. Needham did thinke. Here they killed
many swine, sturgin and beavers and barbicued them, soe returned and were fifteen
dayes runing up a gainst ye streame but noe mountainous land to bee seene but all
levell.!

Arthur was then sent back to Virginia by the Tamahita chief;
and he reached Wood’s house June 18, 1674.

This narrative leaves a great deal to be desired, and the reliability
of much of that reported by Arthur is not beyond question, but the
existence of a tribe of the name and its approximate location is
established. The narrative is also of interest as containing the

1 Alvord and Bidgood, op. cit., pp. 218-223.

188 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

only specific information of any sort regarding their manners and
customs.

For some years after the period of this narrative we hear not a
word regarding the tribe, and when they reappear it is on the De
Crenay map as “Tamaitaux,”’ on the east bank of the Chattahoo-
chee above the Chiaha and nearly opposite a part of the Sawokli.!
A little later Adair enumerates the ‘‘’Ta-mé-tah’’ among those tribes
which the Muskogee had induced to incorporate with them.? They
appear among other Lower Creek towns in the enumeration of 1750,
placed between the northern Sawokli town and the Kasihta.*? On
one of the D’Anville maps of early date we find ‘‘Tamaita’’ laid
down on the west bank of the Coosa not far above its junction with
the Tallapoosa. The Koasati town was just below. In the list of
Creek towns given in 1761 in connection with the assignment of
traderships we find this entry: ‘‘27 Coosawtee including Tomhe-
taws.”’ The hunters of the two numbered 125 and they were located
“close to the French barracks’? where was the Koasati town from
very early times.‘ Thus it appears that some at least of the Tama-
hita had moved over among the Upper Creeks sometime between
1733 and 1761 or perhaps earlier. Bernard Romans, on January 17,
1772, when descending the Tombigbee River, mentions passing the
‘“Tomeehettee bluff, where formerly a tribe of that nation resided,’’®
and Hamilton identifies this bluff with McIntosh’s Bluff, a former
location of the Tohome tribe.* It is probable that some Tamahita
moved over to this river at the same time as the Koasati and Okchai,
a little before Romans’s time, and afterwards returned with them to
the upper Alabama.

Memory of them remained long among the Lower Creeks, since an
aged informant of the writer, a Hitchiti Indian, born in the old coun-
try, claimed to be descended from them. According to him there was
a tradition that the Tamahita burned a little trading post belonging
to the English, whereupon the English called upon their Creek allies
to punish the aggressors. The Tamahita were much more numerous
than their opponents, but were not very warlike, and were driven
south to the very point of Florida, where they escaped in boats to
some islands. This tradition appears to be the result of an erroneous
identification of the Tamahita with the Timucua. There is no evi-
dence that the Creeks had a war with the former people.

After the above account had been prepared some material came
under the eye of the writer tending to the conclusion that Tamahita
must be added to that already long list of terms under which the

1 See plate 5; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190. 4 Ga. Col. Does., vim, p. 524.
2 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257. ’ Romans, Nat. Hist. E. and W. Fla., p. 332.
3 MS., Ayer Coll. 6 Hamilton, op. cit., p. 106. See pp. 160-165.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 189

Yuchi tribes appear in history. In view of the already formidable
number of these Yuchi identifications—Hogologe, Tahogale, Chiska,
Westo, Rickohockan—he would have preferred some other out-
come, but we must be guided by facts and these facts point in one
and the same direction.

The first significant circumstance is that, with one or two easily
explained exceptions, wherever the name Tamahita or any of its
synonyms is used none of the other terms bestowed upon the Yuchi
occurs. This is true of the De Crenay map (pl. 5), of the French
census of 1750,! and of the list of tribes incorporated into the Creek
confederacy given by Adair.? The only exceptions are where dif-
ferent bands might be under consideration. Thus in the census of
1761 ‘‘Tomhetaws’’ are mentioned in connection with the Koasati
living near the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers, Ala-
bama, while the Yuchi among the Lower Creeks and those which
had formerly been on the Choctawhatchee are entered under their
proper names.’ Romans, too, speaks of a town of ‘‘Euchas”’
among the Lower Creeks and in a different part of his work of a
former tribe called ‘‘Tomeehetee’’ which gave its name to a bluff
on the Tombigbee River.* These exceptions, however, are not of
much consequence.

In the second place the names of almost all of the other important
Creek tribal subdivisions do occur alongside of the Tamahita. On the
De Crenay map and in the French census of 1750 this tribe is located
among the Lower Creeks, alongside of the Coweta, Kasihta, Apa-
lachicola, Sawokh, Osochi, Eufaula, Okmulgee, Oconee, Hitchiti,
Chiaha, and Tamali.* Adair gives them as one of a number of ‘‘broken
tribes”’ said to have been incorporated with the Creeks proper, and
he seems to have been familiar only with those living among the Upper
Creeks, for the others mentioned in connection with them were all
settled here, viz, Tuskegee, Okchai, Pakana, Witumpka, Shawnee,
Natchez, and Koasati. As incorporated tribes among the Lower
Creeks he notes the Osochi, Oconee, and Sawokli. In other places
where Tamahita are mentioned among the Upper Creeks we find,
in addition to the above, the Okchaiutci, Kan-tcati (Alabama),
people of Coosa Old Town, and Muklasa, while the Tawasa are given
in the census of 1750 and on the De Crenay map of 1733 as entirely
distinet.°

Taking the Lower Creek towns by themselves we find all of the
towns accounted for except the Yuchi towns and two or three which
were located upon Chattahoochee River for a very brief period.

1 MS, in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. 4 Romans, E. and W. Fla., pp. 280, 332.
2 Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257. * Loc. cit.
3 Ga, Col. Does., vim, pp. 522-524.

190 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

haps Kealedji. The first two, however, occur independently in Adair’s
list, and the others are well-known Muskogee divisions which appear
alongside of the Tamahita among the Upper Creeks. The Yamasee
were also here for very brief periods but at a pomt much farther down
the river than that where the Tamahita are placed.

Thirdly, Yuchi are known to have lived at or in the neighborhood
of most of the places assigned to the Tamahita. The topography
of the De Crenay map is too uncertain to enable us to base any conclu-
sions upon it, but in the census of 1750 the Tamahita are given at
approximately the same distance from Fort Toulouse as Coweta and
Kasihta, and 3 leagues nearer than Chiaha, very close to the position
which the (unnamed) Yuchi then occupied. As we shall see when we
come to discuss the Yuchi as a.whole, there was at least one band of
Indians belonging to this tribe among the Upper Creeks, remnants
apparently of the Choctawhatchee band. The Tamahita which
figure in this section of the Creek country may, therefore, have been
a part of these. I believe, however, that there was a second band of
Yuchi here, which had had a somewhat different history. When we
come to discuss the Yuchi Indians we shall find that a section of
these people, called generally Hogologe or Hog Logee, accompanied
the Apalachicola Indians and part of the Shawnee to the Chatta-
hoochee River about 1716. The Apalachicola were satisfied with this
location, but some time later the Shawnee migrated to the Talla-
poosa, and I think it probable that at least a part of the Hogologe
Yuchi went with them. We know that relations between these two
tribes must have been intimate for Bartram was led to believe that
the Yuchi spoke ‘‘the Savanna or Savanuca tongue,” and Speck
testifies to cordial understandings between them extending down to
the present time. But Hawkins gives us something more definite.
In a diary which he kept during his travels through the Creek Nation
in 1796 he states, under date of Monday, December 19, when he was
following the course of the Tallapoosa River toward its mouth and
along its southern shore, ‘‘half a mile [beyond a large spring by the
river bank is] the Uchee village, a remnant of those settled on the
Chattahoochee; half a mile farther pass a Shawne village.’’? In his
Sketch, representing conditions a few years later, he says, in the
course of his description of the same Shawnee village, ‘‘“Some Uchees
have settled with them,” and there is every reason to believe that they
were the Yuchi who had formerly occupied a town of their own half a
mile away.°

Last of all, we must not lose sight of the fact that the origin of the
Tamahita, like that of the Yuchi, may be traced far north to the

1 Bartram, Travels, p. 387; Speck, Anth. Pub., 2 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., 1x, p. 41.
U. of Pa. Mus.,1, p. 11. 3 See p. 320; also plate 8.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 191

Tennessee mountains. It seems rather improbable that a tribe from
such a distant country could have settled among the Creeks and,
after living in closest intimacy with them for so many years, have
passed entirely out of existence without any further hint of their
affiliations or any more information regarding them. And the fact
that they and the Yuchi share so many points in common and appear
in the same places, though practically never side by side, must be
added to this as constituting strong circumstantial evidence that
they were indeed one and the same people.

THE ALABAMA

Next to the Muskogee themselves the most conspicuous Upper
Creek tribe were the Alabama, or Albamo. As shown by their lan-
guage and indicated by some of their traditions they were connected
more nearly with the Choctaw and Chickasaw than with the Creeks.
Stiggins declares that the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Hitchiti, and Koasati
languages were mutually intelligible,t and this was true at least of
Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Koasati.

According to the older traditions the Alabama had come from the
west, or perhaps, rather from the southwest, to their historic seats,
but these traditions do not carry them to a great distance. Adair,
referring to the seven distinct dialects reported as spoken near Fort
Toulouse, said that the people claimed to have come from South
America.”

The following account of their origin was obtained originally from
Se-ko-pe-chi (‘‘ Perseverance’’), who is described as ‘‘ one of the oldest
Creeks, . . . in their new location west of the Mississippi,’’? about
the year 1847, and was published by Schoolcraft: *

The origin of the Alabama Indians as handed down by oral tradition, is that they
sprang out of the ground, between the Cahawba and Alabama Rivers. . . . The earliest
migration recollected, as handed down by oral tradition, is that they emigrated from
the Cahawba and Alabama Rivers to the junction of the Tuscaloosa [Tombigbee ?] and
Coosa [Alabama ?] Rivers. Their numbers at that period were not known. The
extent of the territory occupied at that time was indefinite. At the point formed
by the junction of the Tuscaloosa and Coosa Rivers the tribe sojourned for the space
of two years, after which their location was at the junction of the Coosa and Alabama
Rivers, on the west side of what was subsequently the site of Fort Jackson. It is
supposed that at this time they numbered fifty effective men. They claimed the
country from Fort Jackson to New Orleans for their hunting-grounds. .

They are of the opinion that the Great Spirit brought them from the ground, and
that they are of right possessors of this soil.

1 Stiggins, MS.

2 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., pp. 267-268.

3 Ind. Tribes, 1, pp. 266-267.

4 The name Coosa was once extended over the Alabama as well as the stream which now bears the name;
there is some reason to think that the Tombigbee may occasionally have been called the Tuscaloosa, At
any rate this construction would reconcile the present tradition with the one following.

192 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

From Ward Coachman, an old Alabama Indian in Oklahoma, Dr.
Gatschet obtained the following:

Old Alabama men used to say that the Alabama came out of the ground near the
Alabama River a little up stream from its junction with the Tombigbee, close to
Holsifa (Choctaw Bluff). After they had come out an owl hooted. They were
scared and most of them went back into the ground. That is why the Alabama are
few in number. The Alabama towns are Tawasa, Pawokti, Oktcaiyutci, Atauga,
Hatcafa’ski (River Point, at the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa), and Wetumka.

From one of the oldest women among the Alabama living in
Texas I obtained a long origin myth in which the tribe is represented
as having come across the Atlantic, but this is evidently mixed up
with the story of the discovery of America by the white people and
is of little value in restoring the old tradition. The relationship
recognized between the Alabama and Koasati is illustrated by the
following story, said to have been told by an old Indian now dead:

The Alabama and Koasati came out of the earth on opposite sides of the root of a cer-
tain tree and settled there in two bodies. Consequently these differed somewhat
in speech, though they always kept near each other. At first they came out of the
earth only during the night time, going down again when day came. Presently a
white man came to the place, saw the tracks, and wanted to find the people. He
went there several times, but could discover none of them above ground. By and by
he decided upon a ruse, so he left a barrel of whisky near the place where he saw the
footsteps. When the Indians came out again to play they saw the barrel, and were
curious about it, but at first no one would touch it. Finally, however, one man
tasted of its contents, and presently he began to feel good and to sing and dance about.
Then the others drank also and became so drunk that the white man was able to catch
them. Afterward the Indians remained on the surface of the earth.

The tradition of a downstream origin may have been due to the
former residence of the Tawasa Alabama near Mobile. This has
certainly given its entire tone to the story which Stiggins relates.'

Finally, mention may be made of Milfort’s extravagant Creek
migration legend in which the Creek Indians proper are represented
as having pursued the Alabama from the western prairies near Red
River across the Missouri, Mississippi, and Ohio in succession until
they reached their later home in central Alabama.

After De Soto and his companions had left the Chickasaw, by
whom they had been severely handled, they reached a small village
called Limamu? by Ranjel and Alimamu® by Elvas. This was on
April 26, 1541. Biedma says nothing of the village, but states that
they set out toward the northwest for a province called Alibamo.*

On Thursday they came to a plain where was a stockaded fort
defended by many Indians. According to Biedma the Indians had
built this stockade across the trail the Spaniards were to take merely

1 See p. 140. 3 Ibid., 1, p. 108.
2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, Ul, p. 136. ‘Tbid., m1, p. 24.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 198

to try their strength, though having nothing whatever to defend. !
It is evident that no women or children were there, but it is most
likely that the place was a stockaded town from which the non-
combatants had been removed in anticipation of the arrival of the
Spaniards. Elvas gives quite a lively picture of this fort and the
Indians within. He says:

Many were armed, walking upon it, with their bodies, legs, and arms painted and
ochred, red, black, white, yellow, and vermilion in stripes, so that they appeared to
have on stockings and doublet. Some wore feathers and others horns on the head;
the face blackened, and the eyes encircled with vermilion, to heighten their fierce
aspect. So soon as they saw the Christians draw nigh they beat drums, and, with
loud yells, in great fury came forth to meet them.?

After a sharp engagement the Spaniards drove these Indians
from their position with considerable loss, but were prevented from
following up their success by an unfordable river behind the stockade,
across Which the greater part of the Indians escaped. Garcilasso,
who, as usual, passes this entire affair under a magnifying glass,
calls the fort ‘‘Fort Alibamo,’’* but it so happens that not one of the
three standard authorities applies this term to it. Two of them, as
we have seen, give the name to a small village in which they had
camped two days earlier. Nevertheless Biedma’s reference to a
‘Province of Alibamo’’ seems to indicate that the Spaniards were
actually in a region occupied by Alabama Indians, although we do
not know whether the entire tribe was present or only one section
of it. It has been supposed by some that the Ulibahali mentioned
before the great Mobile encounter were the later Alabama or con-
stituted an Alabama town, but while it is true that the name bears
some resemblance to that of a possible Alabama town, the Alabama
word for village being ola, it is quite certain that we must seek in
it the name of a true Muskogee town.‘

After 1541 the Alabama disappear entirely from sight until
the French settlement of Louisiana, when we find them located in
their well-known later historic seats on the upper course of the
river which bears their name. The first notice of them occurs in
March, 1702, after the foundation of the first Mobile fort had been
begun, where they appear together with the Conchaque—by which
is evidently meant the Muskogee—as enemies of the Mobile tribes
whom they had caused to abandon many of their former settle-
ments. Pénicaut says that Iberville sent messengers from Mobile
to the Choctaw and Alabama, and that their chiefs came to him to
sing the calumet of peace along with the chiefs of the Mobile;*

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, n, p. 24. 4See p. 254.
3 Ibid., 1, pp. 108-109. ’Margry, Déc., v, p. 425.
3 Garcilasso, in Shipp, De Soto and Fla., pp. 401-403.

148061°—22 13

194 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

but he is perhaps in error in placing the visit of the chiefs before
Iberville’s return, as Iberville himself says nothing regarding it,
while La Harpe states that eight honored chiefs of the Alabama came
to the Mobile fort May 12, fifteen days after Iberville’s departure.
These eight chiefs, La Harpe informs us, ‘‘came to ask M. de Bienville
whether they should continue the war against the Chicachas, the
Tomés, and the Mobiliens. He counseled them to make peace,
gave them some presents, and so determined them to carry out what
they had promised.’? In the report which he drew up after his
return to France from this expedition Iberville speaks of these Indians
as follows:

The Conchaques and Alibamons have their first villages thirty-five or forty leagues
northeast, a quarter east from the Tohomés, on the banks of a river which falls into
the Mobile five leagues above the fort, toward the east. These two villages may

consist of four hundred families; the greater part have guns, are friends of the English
and will be shortly ours.? i

In May, 1703, the English induced the Alabama to declare against
the French, and the latter, deceived by the promise that they would
find plenty of corn among them, sent into their country a man
named Labrie with four Canadians. When within two days journey
of the Alabama village 12 Indians came to meet them bringing a
peace calumet. That night, however, they killed all of the French-
men but one named Charles, who escaped, although with a broken
arm, and carried the news to Mobile. According to Pénicaut,
Bienville immediately undertook to avenge this injury, but was
deserted by his Mobile and other allies who were secretly in sympathy
with his enemies. This obliged him to return without having accom-
plished anything.t. Such an expedition may have been undertaken,
but from other information relative to the relations between the
Mobiletribes and the Alabama an understanding between the twoseems
rather improbable. According to La Harpe it was not until De-
cember 22, 1703, that Bienville set out to punish the injury that had
been received.’ This Pénicaut represents as immediately following
the abortive attempt just related. Ja Harpe says:

He left [Fort Louis de la Mobile] with forty soldiers and Canadians in seven piro-
gues. January 3, 1704, he discovered the fire of a party of the enemy. A little after-
ward, having discovered ten pirogues, he took counsel of MM. de Tonty and de Saint-
Denis, who were of the opinion, contrary to his own, that they should wait until
night in order to attack them. These Alibamons were camped on a height difficult
of access. The night was very dark, and they took a trail filled with brambles and
vines, almost impracticable. The enemy posted in this place to the number of
twelve, hearing the noise, fired a volley from their guns through the bushes; they
killed two Frenchmen and wounded another; but they soon took to flight in order

1 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., p. 72. 4 Margry, Déc., v, p. 429.
2 Margry, Déc., Iv, p. 594. 6 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., p. 82.
3 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., pp. 76-77. 6 Margry, Déc., v, pp. 429-431.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 195

to join their party, which was hunting in the neighborhood of this place. M. de
Bienville had their canoes loaded with meat and corn upset. He then returned to
the fort on the 11th of the same month.'

Pénicaut’s account of the affair is as follows:

After we had returned [from the previous abortive expedition which he describes]
M. de Bienville had prepared some days afterward ten canoes, and as soon as they
were ready he had us embark to the number of fifty Frenchmen with our officers, of
which he was first in rank, and we left secretly at night in order to conceal our move-
ment from the savages. At the end of some days of travel, when we were within ten
leagues of the village of the Alibamons, very near the place where the four Frenchmen
had been killed, we saw a fire. There was on the river within two gunshots from this
fire fourteen canoes of these Alibamons, who were hunting, accompanied by their
families. We went down again a quarter of a league because it was too light; we
remained half a league from the savages the rest of the day, in a place where our
canoes were concealed behind a height of land. We sent six men up on this height in
order to reconnoiter the place where their cabins were, which we discovered easily
from there. It was necessary to ascend the river to a point above in order to land
opposite. When we perceived that their fire was almost out, and they were believed
to be asleep, M. de Bienville had us advance. After having passed a little height,
we went down into a wood, where there was a very bad trail. When we were near
the cabins where the savages were asleep, one of our Frenchmen stepped on a dry
cane, which made a noise in breaking. One of the savages who was not yet asleep
began to cry out in their language, ‘‘Who goes there?” which obliged us to keep
silence. The savage, after some time, hearing no more noise, lay down. We then
advanced, but the savages, hearing us march, rising uttered the death cry and fired
a volley, which killed one of our people. Immediately their old people, their women,
and their children fled. Only those bearing arms retired last, letting go at us many
volleys. On our side we did not know whether we had killed a single one, because
we did not know in the night where we were shooting. The savages having retired, we
remained in their cabins until daybreak; we burned them before leaving them in
order to return to the river, where we found their canoes, which we took, along with
the merchandises which were in them, to our fort of Mobile.”

La Harpe notes that on March 14, 1704, following, 20 Chickasaw
brought to Mobile 5 Alabama scalps and received guns, powder,
and ball in exchange.? November 18, 20 Choctaw brought in 3
more scalps of the same people. January 21, 1706, many Choctaw
chiefs came bringing 9 more Alabama scalps.’ February 21, M. de
Boisbrillant led a party of 60 Canadians and 12 Indians against the
Alabama. He surprised a hunting party of Alabama and, according
to Pénicaut, killed all of the men and carried away all of the women
and children.* La Harpe says that he brought back 2 scalps and
1 slave.’ The same year it was learned that the Alabama and
Chickasaw together, incited by an English trader, had been instrumen-
tal in forcing the Tunica to abandon their former homes on the lower
Yazoo.

1 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., pp. 82-83. 5 Ibid., p. 95.
2 Margry, Déc. v, pp. 429-431. 6 Margry, Déc., Vv, pp. 431-432.
3 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., p. 83. 7 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., p. 96.

«Tbid., p. 86.

196 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

According to Pénicaut, M. de Chateaugué led an expedition
against the Alabama about this time, encountered a war party of
that nation on its way to attack the Choctaw, and killed 15 of them.
He places this among the events of the year 1703, but it must have
been either in 1705 or 1706. The Alabama probably took part in
the English expedition against the Apalachee in 1703, already related,
and in those against the Apalachicola in 1706 and 1707.2, In Novem-
ber, 1707, they and the Creeks together invested Pensacola,led by 13
Englishmen, but they were obliged to withdraw.? Under date of 1708
Pénicaut mentions an expedition under M. de Chateaugué, consisting
of 60 Frenchmen and 60 Mobile Indians, against Alabama hunting in
the neighborhood, in which they killed 30, wounded 7, and carried 9
away prisoners. The same year he relates an adventure on the part
of two Frenchmen who were captured by Indians of this tribe, but
being left with only two guards were able to kill them and escape to
Mobile.*> The Alabama and their allies marched against the Mobile
“with 4,000 men,” but only succeeded in burning some cabins.* In
1709 Pénicaut speaks of an encounter between 15 Choctaw and
50 Alabama, to the advantage of the former—who tell the story.’
In March, 1712, La Harpe notes that Bienville ‘‘placated the Ali-
bamons, Alibikas, and other nations of Carolina, and reconciled them
with those who were allied to us; the peace was general among the
savages.’’ ®

In 1714 English influence was so strong that it even extended
over most of the Choctaw, but the next year the Yamasee war broke
out and proved to be a general anti-English movement among south-
ern Indians. Bienville seized this opportunity to renew his alliance
with the Alabama and other tribes, and it was at about the same
period that he established a post in the midst of the Alabama, which
was known officially as Fort Toulouse, but colloquially as the Alabama .
Fort. Later the Tawasa came from Mobile Bay and settled near
their relatives. Pénicaut mentions the Alabama among those tribes
which came to ‘“‘sing the calumet” before M. de l’Epinay in 1717,°
but from the time of the founding of Fort Toulouse until the end
of French domination we hear very little about these people from
the French. Peace continued to subsist between them, and the
greater part of the tribe was evidently devoted to the French interest.
In the early Carolina documents there are few references to them, the
general name Tallapoosa being used for them and their Creek neigh-
bors on Tallapoosa River. It is curious that the name Alabama does

1 Margry, Déc., v, p. 435.

6 jbid:, p. 478.

2 See pp. 121-123, 130. 7 Ibid., p. 483.
3 La Harpe, Jour. Hist., pp. 103-104. 8 La Harpe, op. cit., p. 110.
4 Margery, op. cit., pp. 478-479. 9 Margry, op. cit., p. 547.

5 Jbid., pp. 479-481.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 197

not occur in the list of Creek towns in the census of 1761, but part of
them may be included in the following: ‘‘Welonkees including red
Ground, 70 hunters,’’ the name of the principal Alabama town
being ‘‘ Red Ground” in Hawkins’s time.'| Another part of them are,
however, represented by the ‘Little Oakchoys, assigned to Wm.
Trewin.”’* The enumeration of 1750 seems to give Red Ground in the
distorted form ‘‘Canachequi.’’* In 1777 Bartram visited a town which
he calls ‘‘Alabama”’ situated at the junction of the Coosa and
Tallapoosa Rivers, but this seems really to have been Tuskegee.‘
Hawkins enumerates four settlements which he believed to be the
ancient Alabama, but in fact only the first of these appears to have
consisted of true Alabama, the others being probably made up of
later additions, which have already been considered (pp. 137-141).
Following is his description of these four places:

Ist. E-cun-chate; from E-cun-na, earth, and chate, red. A small village on the
left bank of Alabama, which has its fields on the right side, in the cane swamp; they
are a poor people, without stock, are idle and indolent, and seldon make bread enough,
but have fine melons in great abundance in their season. The land back from the
settlement is of thin quality, 6ak, hickory, pine and ponds. Back of this, hills, or
waving. Here the soil is of good quality for cultivation; that of thin quality extends
nearly a mile.

2d. Too-wos-sau, is three miles below E-cun-cha-te, on the same side of the river;
a small village on a high bluff, the land is good about, and back of the village; they
have some lots fenced with cane, and some with rails, for potatoes and ground nuts;
the corn is cultivated on the right side of the river, on rich cane swamps; these people
have a few hogs, but no other stock.

3d. Pau-woc-te; a small village two miles below Too-was-sau,® on a high bluff, the
same side of the river; the land is level and rich for five miles back; but none of it
is cultivated around their houses; their fields are on the right bank of the river, on
rich cane swamp; they have a few hogs and horses, but no cattle; they had, formerly,
the largest and best breed of hogs in the nation, but have lost them by carelessness
or inattention.®

4th. At-tau-gee; a small village four miles below Pau-woc-te, spread out for two
miles on the right bank of the river; they have ‘fields on both sides, but their chief
dependence is on the left side; the land on the left side is rich; on the right side the
pine forest extends down to At-tau-gee Creek; below this creek the land is rich.

These people have very little intercourse with white people; although they are
hospitable, and offer freely any thing they have, to those who visit them. ‘They
have this singular custom, as soon as a white person has eaten of any dish and left it,
the remains are thrown away, and every thing used by the guest immediately washed.

They have some hogs, horses, and cattle, in a very fine range, perhaps the best on
the river; the land to the east as far as Ko-e-ne-cuh, and except the plains ( Hi-yuc-

1 Ga. Col. Docs., val, p. 524.

2 Tbid., p. 524.

3-MS., Ayer Coll.

‘ Bartram, Travels, pp. 445, 461.

’ Also given as 7 miles below the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa.—Hawkins in Coll. Ga. Hist. Soc.,
Ix, p. 170.

® In 1797 Hawkins states that the trader here was ‘Charles Weatherford, a man of infamous character,
a dealer in stolen horses; condemned and reprieved the 28th of May.”—Coll. Ga. Hist. Soc., Ix, p. 170;
the last clause, after ‘‘ but,” is wanting in the Lib. of Cong. MS.

198 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

pul-gee), is well watered, with much canebrake, a very desirable country. On the
west or right side, the good land extends about five miles, and on all the creeks below
At-tau-gee, it is good; some of the trees are large poplar, red oak, and hickory, walnut
on the margins of the creeks, and pea-vine in the valleys

These four villages have, in all, about eighty gunmen; they do not conform to the
customs of the Creeks, and the Creek law for the punishment of adultery is not known
to them.'

At an earlier period the Alabama had a town still farther down-
stream which appears in many maps under the name Nitahauritz,
interpreted by Mr. H. S. Halbert to mean “ Bear Fort.”

Hawkins mentions the fact that already a body of Koasati had
gone beyond the Mississippi.2 He does not say the same of the
Alabama, yet we know that that tribe had also begun to splitup. In
describing the Koasati an account of one of these migrations will
be given. From the papers of the British Indian agent, John Stuart,
we learn that as early as 1778 bands of Kan-tcati and Tawasa had
moved into northern Florida,* and after the Creek-American war
their numbers were swollen very considerably. They did not, how-
ever, long maintain a distinct existence. The movement toward the
west was of much more importance. It appears that the long asso-
ciation of these Indians with the French, due to the presence of a
French post among them, had bred an attachment to that nation
among the Alabama equally with the tribes about Mobile Bay, and
part of them also decided to move across into Louisiana after the
peace of 1763. A further inducement was the almost virgin hunting
ground to be found in parts of that colony. That the first emigra-
tion occurred about the date indicated (1763)* is proved by Sibley,
writing in 1806, who has the following to say of the Alabama in the
State of Louisiana in his time:

Allibamis, are likewise from West Florida, off Allibami River, and came to Red River
about the same time of the Boluxas and Appalaches. Part of them have lived on
Red River, about sixteen miles above the Bayau Rapide, till last year, when most
of this party, of about thirty men, went up Red River, and have settled themselves
near the Caddoques, where, I am informed, they last year made a good crop of corn.
The Caddos are friendly to them, and have no objection to their settling there. They
speak the Creek and Chactaw languages, and Mobilian; most of them French, and
some of them English.

There is another party of them, whose village is on a small creek, in Appelousa
district, about thirty miles northwest from the church of Appelousa. They consist
of about forty men. They have lived at the same place ever since they came from
Florida; are said to be increasing a little in numbers, for a few years past. They
raise corn, have horses, hogs, and cattle, and are harmless, quiet people.®

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, pp. 36-37. Bossu’s account shows clearly that the last statement is erroneous.

2 See p. 204.

3 Copy of MS., Lib. Cong.

4 It may have been a few years later, for John Stuart, the British Indian agent, writes, December 2, 1766,
that some of these Indians had expressed a desire to settle on the banks of the Mississippi.—English tran-
seriptions, Lib. Cong.

® Sibley in Annals of Congress, 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1085 (1806-7).

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 199

In August, 1777, William Bartram visited an Alabama village on
the Mississippi 2 miles above the Manchac. He describes it as
“delightfully situated on several swelling green hills, gradually
ascending from the verge of the river.’’' A friend accompanying
him purchased some native baskets and pottery from the inhabit-
ants. In 1784 Hutchins found them in about the same place.
It will be noticed that Sibley does not mention a previous sojourn
of either of the parties of Alabama described by him on the Mis-
sissippi River, and we are in the dark as to whether they had sepa-
rated after coming into Louisiana or before. If they came sepa-
rately it would seem most likely that the Opelousas band was the
one settled on the Mississippi. This at any rate was in accordance
with the belief of John Scott, the late chief of the Alabama now residing
in Texas and the oldest person among them. He informed the writer
in 1912 that the name of the old Alabama town on the Mississippi
River was Aktcabehale. From there they moved to ‘‘ Mikiwi’l”’ close
to Opelousas, and from there to the Sabine River, where they formed
a new town which received no special name. There was an Alabama
village in Texas called Fenced-in-village a short distance west by south
of a mill and former post office called Mobile, Tyler County, Texas.
Next they settled in what is now Tyler County, Texas, at a town
which they called Tak’o’sha-o’la (‘‘Peach-tree Town’’). This was
about 2 miles due north of Chester or 20 miles north of Woodville,
Texas. Their next town was 3 miles from Peach-tree Town and
contained a ‘‘big house” (i’ sa tcuba) and a dance ground, but was
unnamed. After a time the Alabama chief decided to move to
Pat’ala’ka (said to mean ‘‘Cane place’’) where the Biloxi and Pasca-
goula lived, and some other Indians went with him. Part, however,
returned to Louisiana, where they remained three years. At the end
of that time they came back to Texas and formed a village which took
its name from a white man, Jim Barclay. They moved from there to
the village which they now occupy, which is called Big Sandy village
from the name of a creek, although it took some time for the families
scattered about in Texas to come in.

According to some white informants the Alabama settled on Red
River, moved to Big Sandy village, and perhaps both parties finally
united there. A few families, however, still remain in Calcasieu and
St. Landry Parishes, Louisiana. The language of all of the Texas Ala-
bama is practically uniform, but the speech of some of the Tapasola
clan is said to vary a little from the normal.

The Alabama who had remained in their old country took a promi-
nent part in the Creek war. Indeed Stiggins says that ‘“‘ they did more
murder and other mischief in the time of their hostilities in the year

1 Bartram, Travels, p. 427. 2 Hutchins, Narr., p. 44.

200 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73.

1813 than all the other tribes together.’”’! After the treaty of Fort
Jackson, in 1814, by which all of the old Alabama land was ceded to
the whites, the same writer says that part of them settled above the
mouth of Cubahatche in a town called Towassee, while the rest moved
to a place on Coosa River above Wetumpka. He states that the town
belonging to this latter division was Otciapofa, but he is evidently
mistaken, because Otciapofa has been pure Creek as far back as we
have any knowledge of it.2, Perhaps the Coosa settlement was that
called Autauga in the census of 1832, or it may have contained the
Okchaiutci Indians, whose history will be given presently. I have
suggested elsewhere that the names of these towns seem to show the
part of the tribe which remained with the Creeks to have been the
Tawasa. Speaking of the Alabama Indians in his time Stiggins says
that, while their chiefs were admitted to the national councils on the
same terms as the others, they seldom associated with the Creeks
otherwise. After their removal the Alabama settled near the Cana-
dian, but some years later went still farther west and located about
the present town of Weleetka, Okla. A small station on the St.
Louis-San Francisco Railroad just south of Weleetka bears their
name. While a few of these Indians retain their old language it is
rapidly giving place to Creek and English. They have the distinction
of being the only non-Muskogee tribe incorporated with the Creeks,
exclusive of the Yuchi, which still maintains a square ground.

As already noted, one Alabama town received the name, Okchai-
utci, ‘‘ Little Okchai,”’ which suggests relationship with the Okchai
people, but the origin of this the Indians explain as follows: At one
time the Alabama (probably only part of the tribe) had rio square
ground and asked the Okchai to take them into theirs. The Okchai
said, ‘‘ All right; you can seat yourself on the other side of my four
backsticks and I will protect you.’’ They did so, and for some time
afterwards the two tribes busked together and played on the same
side in ball games. Later on, however, a dispute arose in connec-
tion with one of these games and the Alabama separated, associating
themselves with the Tukabahchee and hence with the opposite fire
clan. Afterwards those Alabama formed a town which they called
Okchaiutci, and to this day Okchaiutci is one of the names given the
Alabama Indians in set speeches at the time of the busk. According
to my informant, himself an Okchai Indian, the date of this separa-
tion was as late as 1872-73, but he must be much in error since we
find Okchaiutci in existence long before the removal to Oklahoma.

Okchaiutci appears first, apparently, in the census list of 1750,
though the diminutive ending is not used. In 1761 the trader located

1 Stiggins, MS.
2 Still they may have occupied the site of Otciapofafor atime. This place and Little Tulsa were so
close together that they were often confounded.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 201

there was William Trewin.' It is not separately mentioned by Bar-
tram nor certainly by Swan, but is probably intended by the town
which he calls ‘‘Wacksoyochees.”’* Hawkins gives the following
description:

Hook-choie-oo-che, a pretty little compact town, between O-che-au-po-fau and
Tus-kee-gee, on the left bank of Coosau; the houses join those of Tus-kee-gee; the land
around the town is a high, poor level, with high-land ponds; the corn fields are on the
left side of Tallapoosa, on rich low grounds, on a point called Sam-bul-loh, and below
the mouth of the creek of that name which joins on the right side of the river.

They have a good stock of hogs, and a few cattle and horses; they formerly lived on
the right bank of Coosau, just above their present site, and removed lately, on account
of the war with the Chickasaws. Their stock ranges on that side of the river; they have
fenced all the small fields about their houses, where they raise their peas and potatoes;
their fields at Sam-bul-loh, are under a good fence; this was made by Mrs, Durant, the
oldest sister of the late General McGillivray, for her own convenience.?

This town does not appear in the census list of 1832, unless it is one
of the two Fishpond towns there given, ‘“‘ Fish Pond”’ and “'Tholl thlo
coe.”’ After the removal to Oklahoma it is said to have maintained
its separate square for a short time, and, as has been said, its name
is retained as a busk designation of all the Alabama.

THE KOASATI

The Koasati Indians, as shown by their language, are closely
related to the Alabama. There were at one time two branches of
this tribe—one close to the Alabama, near what is now Coosada
station, Elmore County, Ala., the other on the Tennessee River
north of Langston, Jackson County. These latter appear but a few
times in history, and the name was considerably garbled by early
writers. There is reason to believe, however, that it has the honor
of an appearance in the De Soto chronicles, as the Coste of Ranjel,‘
the Coste or Acoste of Elvas,® the Costehe of Biedma,® and the
Acosta of Garcilasso.?’ The omission of the vowel between s and ¢
is the only difficult feature in this identification. It is evident also
that it was at a somewhat different point on the river from that
above indicated, since it was on an island. The form Costehe, used
also by Pardo, tends to confirm our identification, since it appears
to contain the Koasati and Alabama suffix -ha indicating collec-
tivity. Ranjel gives the following account of the experience of the
explorers among these ‘‘Costehe:”

On Thursday [July 1, 1540] the chief of Coste came out to receive them in peace, and

he took the Christians to sleep in a village of his; and he was offended because some
soldiers provisioned themselves from, or, rather, robbed him of, some barbacoas of corn

! Ga. Col. Does., vill, p. 524. 5 Tbid., I, p. 78.
2 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262. 6 Ibid., 0, p. 15.
3 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 37. 7 Garcilasso in Shipp, De Soto and Fla., p. 373.

‘ Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, m1, p. 109.

202 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

against his will. The next day, Thursday,! on the road leading toward the principal
village of Coste, he stole away and gave the Spaniards the slip and armed his people.
Friday, the 2d of July, the governor arrived at Coste. This village was on an
island in the river, which there flows large, swift, and hard to enter. And the Chris-
tians crossed the first branch with no small venture, and the governor entered into
the village careless and unarmed, with some followers unarmed. And when the
soldiers, as they were used to do, began to climb upon the barbacoas, in an instant the
Indians began to take up clubs and seize their bows and arrows and to go to the open
square.

The governor commanded that all should be patient and endure for the evident
peril in which they were, and that no one should put his hand on his arms; and he
began to rate his soldiers and, dissembling, to give them some blows with a cudgel; and
he cajoled the chief, and said to him that he did not wish the Christians to make him
any trouble; and they would like to go out to the open part of the island to encamp.
And the chief and his men went with him; and when they were at some distance from
the village in an open place, the governor ordered his soldiers to lay hands on the
chief and ten or twelve of the principal Indians, and to put them in chains and collars;
and he threatened them, and said that he would burn them all because they had laid
hands on the Christians. From this place, Coste, the governor sent two soldiers to
view the province of Chisca, which was reputed very rich, toward the north, and they
brought good news. There in Coste they found in the trunk of a tree as good honey
and even better than could be had in Spain. In that river were found some muscles
that they gathered to eat, and some pearls. And they were the first these Christians
saw in fresh water, although they are to be found in many parts of this land.”

In one of the accounts of Juan Pardo’s expedition of 1567 we are
told that he turned back because he learned that the Indians of
Carrosa, Costehe, Chisca, and Cosa had united against him.’ This
is the last mention of such a tribe by the Spaniards, and what we
hear of the northern body of Koasati at a later period is little enough.
We merely know that there was a Koasati village on the Tennessee
River in the latter part of the seventeenth century. The ‘‘Cochali’”’
of Coxe is probably a misprint for the name of this town. They
were said to live on an island in the river just like the Costehe,‘ and
Sauvolle, who derived his information from a Canadian who had
ascended the Tennessee in the summer of 1701 with four companions,
says that ‘‘the Cassoty and the Casquinonpa are on an island, which
the river forms, at the two extremities of which are situated these
two nations.’ They also gave their name to the Tennessee River.
In the map reproduced in plate 3 we find “‘Cusatees 50 in 2 villages”’
laid down on a big island in the “‘Cusatees”’ or ‘‘Thegalegos River,”
just below the “Tohogalegas’’ (Yuchi), and between the two a
French fort. According to Mr. O. D. Street, Coosada was the name
of a mixed settlement of Creeks and Cherokees established about
1784 on the south bank of the Tennessee ‘‘at what is now called

1 Probably Friday.

2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 0, pp. 109-111.

3 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, pp. 271-272.

4 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1850, p. 230.

5 MS. in Lib. La. Hist. Soe., Louisiane, Correspondence Générale, pp. 403-404. Mr. W. E. Myer, the
well-known student of Tennessee archeology, thinks that this was Long Island.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 203

Larkin’s Landing in Jackson County.’! Either this was a new
settlement by the people we are considering or 1784 marks the date
when Cherokee came to live there. The former alternative may
very well have been the true one, because the earlier settlement
appears not to have been on the mainland. We do not know whether
these Koasati were finally absorbed into the Cherokee or whether they
emigrated.

The southern Koasati settlement seems to be mentioned first
in the enumeration of 1750, where the name is spelled ‘‘Couchati,”’
and in the census of 1760 where it appears as “‘Conchatys.”? It
occurs often on maps, however, and in approximately the same place.
The first allusion to the tribe in literature is probably by Adair, who
speaks of “‘ two great towns of the Koo-a-sah-te”’ as having joined the
Creek Confederacy.’ In the list of towns made out in 1761 in order to
assign them to traders ‘‘ Coosawtee including Tomhetaws”’ is enumer-
ated as having 125 hunters, but is not assigned to anyone on account
of its proximity to the French fort.‘ Shortly after this ist was made
out occurred the cession of Mobile to England and the movement of
so many Indian tribes across the Mississippi. This occasioned the
Koasati removal thus referred to by Adair:

Soon after West-Florida was ceded to Great Britain, two warlike towns of the Koo-
a-sah te Indians removed from near the late dangerous Alabama French garrison to
the Choktah country about twenty-five miles below Tombikbe—a strong wooden
fortress, situated on the western side of a high and firm bank, overlooking a narrow
deep point of the river of Mobille, and distant from that capital one hundred leagues.
The discerning old war chieftain of this remnant perceived that the proud Muskohge,
instead of reforming their conduct towards us, by our mild remonstrances, grew only
more impudent by our lenity; therefore being afraid of sharing the justly deserved fate
of the others, he wisely withdrew to this situation; as the French could not possibly
supply them, in case we had exerted ourselves, either in defence to our properties or in
revenge of the blood they had shed. But they were soon forced to return to their for-
mer place of abode, on account of the partiality of some of them to their former con-
federates; which proved lucky in its consequences, to the traders, and our southern
colonies: for, when three hundred warriors of the Muskohge were on their way to. the
Choktah to join them in a war against us, two Kooasaéhte horsemen, as allies, were
allowed to pass through their ambuscade in the evening, and they gave notice of
the impending danger. These Kooasahte Indians annually sanctify the mulberries
by a public oblation, before which they are not to be eaten; which, they say, is accord-
ing to their ancient law.® F

They were accompanied in this movement by some Alabama of
Okchaiutci, and apparently by the Tamahita. In 1771 Romans passed -
their deserted fields on the Tombigbee, which he places 3 miles below
the mouth of Sucarnochee River. Not many years later the lure of
the west moved them again and a portion migrated into Louisiana.

1 Pub. Ala. Hist. Soc.,1, p. 417. 4 Ga. Col. Docs., vu, p. 524.
2MS., Ayer Lib.; Miss. Prov. Arch. I, p. 94. 5 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 267.
3 Adair, Hist. Am, Inds., p. 257. 6 Romans, Nat. Hist. of E. & W. Fla., pp. 326-327.

204 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 73

Sibley would place this event about_1795,' and this agrees well with
Hawkins’s statement that they had left shortly Before his time.
Stiggins is still more specific. He says:

About the year seventeen hundred and ninety-three there was an old Cowassada
chieftain that was called Red Shoes, who was violently opposed to their makeing war
on the Chickasaws, and as it was determined on contrary to his will he resolved to quit
the nation, so he and a mulatto man who resided with the Alabamas named Billy
Ashe headed a party of about twenty families, part Cowasadas and the rest Alabamas,
and removed to the Red River and tried a settlement about sixty miles up from its
mouth, but on trial they were so annoyed and infested by a small red ant that were so
very numerous in that country, that they found it hardly possible to put any thing
beyond their reach or destruction, so after living there a few years they removed
finally from thence to the province of Texas, on the river Trinity, a few miles from
the mouth of said river, where they now live.?

Hawkins thus describes the town occupied by those of the tribe
who remained in their old territory as it existed in 1799:

Coo-sau-dee is a compact little town situated three miles below the confluence of
Coosau and Tallapoosa, on the right bank of Alabama; they have fields on both sides
of the river; but their chief dependence is a high, rich island, at the mouth of Coosau.
They have some fences, good against cattle only, and some families have small patches
fenced, near the town, for potatoes.

These Indians are not Creeks, although they conform to their ceremonies; the men
work with the women and make great plenty of corn; all labor is done by the joint
labor of all, called public work, except gathering in the crop. During the season
for labor, none are exempted from their share of it, or suffered to go out hunting.

There is a rich flat of land nearly five miles in width, opposite the town, on the
left side of the river, on which are numbers of conic mounds of earth. Back of the
town it is pine barren, and continues so westward for sixty to one hundred miles.

The Coo-sau-dee generally go to market * by water, and some of them are good oars-
men. A part of this town moved lately beyond the Mississippi, and have settled
there. The description sent back by them that the country is rich and healthy, and
abounds in game, is likely to draw others after them. But as they have all tasted
the sweets of civil life, in having a convenient market for their products, it is likely
they will soon return to their old settlements, which are in a very desirable country
well suited to the raising of cattle, hogs and horses; they have a few hogs, and seventy
or eighty cattle, and some horses. It is not more than three years since they had not
a hog among them. Robert Walton,* who was then the trader of the town, gave the
women some pigs, and this is the origin of their stock.®

In 1832 eighty-two Koasati were enumerated in the old nation.*®
After their emigration west of the Mississippi they formed two
towns—Koasati No. 1 and Koasati No. 2. But few now remain

1 See p. 205.

2 Stiggins, MS.

3’ The Lib. of Cong. MS. has ‘‘ to Mobile”’ inserted here.

4 He was trader there in 1797 when Hawkins describes him as “an active man, more attentive to his
character now than heretofore.” (Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 169.) He also gives the names of two other
traders, “ Francis Tuzant, an idle Frenchman in debt to Mr. Panton and to the factory,” and “John McLeod
of bad character.” (Ibid.)

5 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., M1, pp. 35-36.

6 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, p. 267.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 905

there who can speak the language. Some of these still remember
that a part went to Texas.

Stiggins’s account above given of the Koasati migration to Lou-
isiana and Texas seems to be considerably abbreviated. There
were probably several distinct movements, or at least the tribe
split into several distinct bands from time to time. It is very likely
that, as in the case of so many other tribes, the Koasati first settled
on Red River, but that part of them soon left it. Sibley’s account
of their movements in Louisiana is more detailed than that of Stig-
gins. He says:

Conchattas are almost the same people as the Allibamis, but came over only ten
years ago; first lived on Bayau Chico, in Appelousa district, but, four years ago,
moved to the river Sabine, settled themselves on the east bank, where they now
live, in nearly a south direction from Natchitoch, and distant about eighty miles.
They call their number of men one hundred and sixty, but say, if they were alto-
gether, they would amount to two hundred. Several families of them live in detached
settlements. They are good hunters, and game is plenty about where they are. A
few days ago, a small party of them were here,! consisting of fifteen persons, men,
women, and children, who were on their return from a bear hunt up Sabine. They
told me they had killed one hundred and eighteen; but this year an uncommon
number of bears have come down. One man alone, on Sabine, during the Summer
and Fall, hunting, killed four hundred deer, sold his skins at forty dollars a hundred.
The bears, this year, are not so fat as common; they usually yield from eight to twelve

llons of oil, each of which never sells for less than a dollar a gallon, and the skin a
dollar more; no great quantity of the meat is saved; what, the hunters don’t use
when out, they generally give to their dogs. The Conchattas are friendly with all
other Indians, and speak well of their neighbors the Carankouas, who, they say, live
about eighty miles south of them, on the bay, which I believe, is the nearest point
to the sea from Natchitoches. A few families of Chactaws have lately settled near them
from Bayau Beauf. The Conchattas speak Creek, which is their native language,
and Chactaw, and several of them English, and one or two of them can read it a little.”

They may have been on Red River previous to their settlement
on Bayou Chicot. Schermerhorn® states that in 1812 the Koasati
on the Sabine numbered 600, but most of these must have left before
1822, because Morse in his report of that year estimates 50 Koasati
on the Neches River in Texas and 240 on the Trinity, while 350 are
set down as living on the Red River in Louisiana.t These last are
elsewhere referred to as a band which had obtamed permission
from the Caddo to locate near them. Whether they were part of the
original settlers from lower down the river or had moved over from
the Sabine is not apparent. By 1850 most of these had gone to
Texas, where Bollaert estimated that the number of their warriors
then on the lower Trinity was 500 in two villages called Coléte and
Batista.’ All of the Koasati did not leave Louisiana at that time,

1 He is writing from the post of Natchitoches.
2 Sibley in Annals of Congress, 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1085-86 (1806-7).
3 Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., 2d ser., 11, p. 26, 1814.
4 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 373.
'Bollaert, in Jour. Ethn. Soc. London, u, p. 282.

206 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

however, a considerable body continuing to occupy the wooded
country in Calcasieu and St. Landry Parishes. Later the two
Texas villages were reduced to one, which in turn broke up, probably
on account of a pestilence, part uniting with the Alabama in Polk -
County, but the greater part returning to Louisiana to join their
kindred there. At the present time about 10 are still living with
the Alabama. Those in Louisiana are more numerous, counting
between 80 and 90, and here is the only spot where the tribe still
maintains itself as a distinct people. Their village is in the pine
woods about 7 miles northeast of Kinder, Allen Parish, La., and 24
miles north of a flag station called Lauderdale on the Frisco Railroad.
Elsewhere very few of this tribe are now to be found who speak pure
Koasati uncorrupted by either Creek or Alabama.

A band of Koasati probably joined the Seminole, since we find
a place marked ‘‘Coosada Old Town” on the middle course of.
Choctawhatchee River in Vignoles’s map of Florida, dated 1823.

Associated with the Koasati we find an Upper Creek town called
Wetumpka, which means in Muskogee ‘‘tumbling or falling water.”
It must not be confounded with a Lower Creek settlement of the
same name, an outvillage of Coweta Tallahassee. It is also claimed
that Wiwohka (q. v.) was originally so called. The Wetumpka with
which we have to deal was on the east bank of Coosa River, in
Elmore County, Alabama, near the falls. At one time there were
two towns here, known as Big Wetumpka and Little Wetumpka re-
spectively, the former on the site of the modern town of Wetumpka,
the latter above the falls in Coosa River.’ Possibly this tribe may
be identical with the Tononpa or Thomapa, which appears on French
maps at the western end of the falls. (See mapof Del’Isle, 1732, and
De Crenay, 1733.)? Itis probably represented by the ‘‘Welonkees”’
of the enumeration of 1761, classed with a town which appears to
have been the principal town of the Alabama.’ It is noted by Bar-
tram as one of those speaking the ‘‘Stinkard’”’ language—i. e., some-
thing other than Muskogee.t He places it beside that of the
Koasati, and it would seem likely that this indicates the true posi-
tion of its people, for when the Koasati moved to Tombigbee River
Wetumpka accompanied them. On January 16, 1772, Romans
passed ‘‘the remains of the old Weetumpkee settlement,’’ 7 miles
above a point which Hamilton identifies as Carneys Bluff,*® on the
Tombigbee River. The removal was probably recent, because on
April 4 of the same year Taitt visited their town ‘‘about one mile
K.S.E. from this [Koasati], up the Tallapuse River,’ and found them

1 Swan in Schooleraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262. 4 Bartram, Travels, p. 461.
2 Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190. 6 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 284, 1910.
3 Ga. Col. Docs., vill, p. 524.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 207

engaged in building a new hot house.!. Presumably this was the first
to be erected after their return from the Tombigbee.

Swan’s reference, 1792, is the last we hear of the tribe. They
probably united with the Koasati or the Alabama.

THE MUKLASA

Still another town in this neighborhood not speaking Muskogee
was Muklasa. The name means ‘‘friends”’ or ‘‘ people of one nation”
in Alabama, Koasati, or Choctaw, therefore it is probable that the
town was Alabama or Koasati, the Choctaw being at a considerable
distance. According to the list of 1761 it was then estimated to
contain 30 hunters. William Trewin and James Germany were the
traders.’ In 1797 the trader was Michael Elhart, ‘‘an industrious,
honest man; a Dutchman.’ Bartram visited it in 1777,° and in 1799
Hawkins gives the following account of it:

Mook-lau-sau is a small town one mile below Sau-va-noo-gee, on the left bank of a
fine little creek, and bordering on a cypress swamp; their fields are below those of
Sau-va-no-gee, bordering on the river; they have some lots about their houses fenced
for potatoes; one chief has some cattle, horses, and hogs; a few others have some cattle
and hogs.

‘In the season of floods the river spreads out on this side below the town, nearly
eight miles from bank to bank, and is very destructive to game and stock.®

After the Creek war we are informed that the Muklasa emigrated
to Florida in a body. At all events we do not hear of them again,
and the Creeks in Oklahoma have forgotten that such a town ever
existed. Gatschet says ‘‘a town of that name is in the Indian Ter-
ritory,’’? but nobody could give the present writer any information
regarding it.

THE TUSKEGEE

Many dialects were spoken anciently near the junction of the
Coosa and Tallapoosa. Adair says:

I am assured by a gentleman of character, who traded a long time near the late
Alebahma garrison, that within six miles of it live the remains of seven Indian nations,
who usually conversed with each other in their own different dialects, though they

understood the Muskohge language; but being naturalized, they are bound to observe
the laws and customs of the main original body.*®

Some of these ‘‘nations’”’ have already been considered. We now
come to a people whose language has not been preserved to the
present day, but they are known from statements made by Taitt and

1 Mereness, Trav. Am. Col., pp. 536-537. 5 Bartram, Travels, p. 444 et seq.

2 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262. 6 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 35.
3 Ga. Col. Does., vul, p. 523. 7 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 138.

4 Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 169. 8 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 267.

208 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Hawkins to have spoken a dialect distinct from Muskogee.' These
were the Tuskegee,? called by Taitt northern Indians. On in-
quiring of some of the old Tuskegee Indians in Oklahoma regarding
their ancient speech I found that they claimed to know of it, and I
obtained the following words, said to have been among those
employed by the ancient people. Some of these are used at the pres-
ent day, and the others may be nothing more than archaic Muskogee,
but they perhaps have some value for future students.

lutcu’a, a mug.

ki/las, to break.

aia‘tito, I will be going; modern form, aibastce’.

tcibuksa’ktce’, come on and go with us! (where one person comes to a crowd of people

and asks them to go with him).

ili-hu’ko-lutci, hen (-utci, little).

talu’sutci, chicken.

ilisai/dja, pot; modern form, lihai‘a 1a’ko.

apa’la, on the other side; modern form, tapa‘la.

wilika’pka, I am going on a visit; modern form, tcukupileidja-lani.

The town Tasqui encountered by De Soto between Tali and Coosa
was perhaps occupied by Tuskegee. Ranjel is the only chronicler
who mentions it, and it can not have impressed the Spaniards as a
place of great importance.* In 1567 Vandera was informed by
some Indians and a soldier that beyond Satapo, the farthest point
reached by the Pardo expedition, two days’ journey on the way to
Coosa, was a place called Tasqui, and a little beyond another known
as Tasquiqui.t| The second of these was certainly, the other prob-
ably, a Tuskegee town. It is possible that a fission was just taking
place in this tribe.

Later in the seventeenth century, when English and French began
to penetrate into the region, we find the Tuskegee divided into two
or more bands, the northernmost on the Tennessee River. Coxe,
who gives their name under the distorted form Kakigue, places
these latter upon an island in the river.’ While they are noticed in
documents and on maps at rare intervals (I find the forms Cacougai,
Cattougui, Caskighi), the clearest light upon their later history
and ultimate fate is thrown by Mr. Mooney in his ‘‘Myths of the
Cherokee.”’* He says:

Another refugee tribe incorporated partly with the Cherokee and partly with the

Creeks was that of the Taskigi, who at an early period had a large town of the same
name on the south side of the Little Tennessee, just above the mouth of Tellico,

1 Taitt in Trav. in Amer. Col., p. 541; Hawkins, see p. 210. To-day some Indians repeat a tradition to the
effect that the Tuskegee are a branch of the Tulsa, but this is evidently a late fabrication based on the
friendship which in later years has subsisted between these two towns.

2 This name perhaps contains the Alabama and Choctaw word for warrior, taska.

3 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, ll, p. 111.

4 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 01, p. 485.

5 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1850, p. 230.

619th Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 388-389.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 209

in Monroe County, Tennessee. Sequoya, the inventor of the Cherokee alphabet,
lived here in his boyhood, about the time of the Revolution. The land was sold in
1819. There was another settlement of the name, and perhaps once occupied by the
same people, on the north bank of Tennessee River, in a bend just below Chattanooga,
Tennessee, on land sold also in 1819. Still another may have existed at one time on
Tuskegee Creek, on the south bank of Little Tennessee River, north of Robbinsville,
in Graham County, North Carolina, on land which was occupied until the removal
in 1838. It is not a Cherokee word, and Cherokee informants state positively that the
Taskigi were a foreign people, with distinct language and customs. They were not
Creeks, Natchez, Uchee, or Shawano, with all of whom the Cherokee were well ac-
quainted under other names. In the town house of their settlement at the mouth
of Tellico they had an upright pole, from the top of which hung their protecting
“medicine,’’ the image of a human figure cut from a cedar log. For this reason the
Cherokee in derision sometimes called the place Atsinik taf (‘‘ Hanging-cedar
place’’). Before the sale of the land in 1819 they were so nearly extinct that the
Cherokee had moved in and occupied the ground.

While part of these people may have removed to the south to
join their friends among the Creeks, the majority were probably
absorbed in the surrounding Cherokee population.

A few maps, such as one of the early Homann maps and the Seale
map of the early part of the eighteenth century, place Tuskegee
near the headwaters of the Coosa. This may be intended to rep-
resent the Tennessee band of Tuskegee or it may show that the
migration of the Alabama Tuskegee southward was a comparatively
late movement, something which took place late in the seventeenth
century or very early in the eighteenth.

The Tuskegee are placed on the Coosa north of the Abihka Indians
on the Couvens and Mortier map of the early part of the eighteenth
century. Perhaps these were the southern band mentioned by
Adair, in the badly misprinted form Tae-keo-ge, as one of those which
the Muskogee had ‘‘artfully decoyed to incorporate with them.” !
He is confirmed in substance by Milfort, who states that they were
a tribe who had suffered severely from their enemies and had in con-
sequence sought refuge with the Creeks.2. The town appears in the
census estimates of 1750. In the enumeration of 1761 we find ‘‘Tus-
kegee including Coosaw old Town” with 40 hunters.‘ The name
does not occur in Bartram’s list, but, as I have said elsewhere, it
appears to be the town which he calls Alabama.’ Hawkins (1799)
has the following to say regarding it:

Tus-kee-gee: This little town is in the fork of the two rivers, Coo-sau and Tal-la-poo-
sa, where formerly stood the French fort Toulouse. The town is ona bluff on the Coo-
sau, forty-six feet above low-water mark; the rivers here approach each other within a
quarter of a mile, then curve out, making a flat of low land of three thousand acres,
which has been rich canebrake; and one-third under cultivation in times past; the

1 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257. 4 Ga. Col. Does., vi, p. 524.
3 Milfort, Mémoire, p. 267. ‘ Bartram, Travels, p. 461; see also p. 197.
3MS., Aver Coll.

148061 °—22—_14

210 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

center of this flat is rich oak and hickory, margined on both sides with rich cane swamp;
. the land back of the town, fora mile, is flat, a whitish clay; small pine, oak, and dwarf
hickory, then high pine forest.

There are thirty buildings in the town, compactly situated, and from the bluff a
fine view of the flat lands in the fork, and on the right bank of Coosau, which river is
here two hundred yards wide. In the yard of the town house there are five cannon
of iron, with the trunions broke off, and on the bluff some brickbats, the only remains
of the French establishment here. There is one apple tree claimed by this town now
in possession of one of the chiefs of Book-choie-oo-che [Okchaiyutci]."

The fields are the left side of Tal-la-poo-sa, and there are some small patches well
formed in the fork of the rivers, on the flat rich land below the bluff.

The Coosau extending itself a great way into the Cherokee country and mountains,
gives scope for a vast accumulation of waters, at times. The Indians remark that
once in fifteen or sixteen years,? they have a flood, which overflows the banks, and
spreads itsolf for five miles or more *in width, in many parts of A-la-ba-ma. The rise
is sudden, and so rapid as to drive a current up the Tal-la-poo-sa for eight miles. In
January, 1796,* the flood rose forty-seven feet, and spread itself for three miles on the
left bank of the A-la-ba-ma. The ordinary width of that river, taken at the first
bluff below the fork, is one hundred and fifty yards. The bluff is on the left side, and
forty-five feet high. On this bluff are five conic mounds of earth, the largest thirty
yards diameter at the base, and seventeen feet high; the others are smaller.

It has been for sometime a subject of enquiry, when, and for what purpose, these
mounds were raised; here it explains itself as to the purpose; unquestionably they
were intended as a place of safety to the people, in the time of these floods; and this
is the tradition among the old people. As these Indians came from the other side of
the Mississippi, and that river spreads out on that side for a great distance, it is proba-
ble, the erection of mounds originated there; or from the custom of the Indians here-
tofore, of settling on rich flats bordering on the rivers, and subject to be overflowed.
The name is E-cun-li-gee, mounds of earth, or literally, earth placed. But why erect
these mounds in high places, incontestably out of the reach of floods? Irom a super-
stitious veneration for ancient customs.

The Alabama overflows its flat swampy margins, annually; and generally, in the
month of March, but seldom in the summer season.

The people of Tuskogee have some cattle, and a fine stock of hogs, more perhaps
than any town of the nation. One man, Sam Macnack [Sam Moniack], a half breed,
has a fine stock of cattle. He had, in 1799, one hundred and eighty calves. They
have lost their language, and speak Creek, and have adopted the customs and man-
ners of the Creeks. They have thirty-five gun men.°

After their removal west the Tuskegee formed a town in the south-
eastern part of the nation. Later a portion, consisting largely of
those who had negro blood, moved northwest and settled west of
Beggs, Okla., close to the Yuchi.

Although our early histories, books of travel, and documents are
well-nigh silent on the subject, it is evident from maps of the southern
regions that part of the Tuskegee got very much farther east at an
early date. A town of Tuskegee, spelled most frequently ‘“Jaska-
ges,’ appears on Chattahoochee River below a town of the Atasi and
above a town of the Kasihta. This appears on the maps of Popple

1 The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘‘ Hook-choie.’’ 3 The Lib. Cong. MS. has “ five or six miles.”
2The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘‘fifteen or twenty 4 The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘£1795.’
years,” 6 Gg. Hist. Soc. Colls., M1, pp. 37-39,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS y cis bal Bl

(1733), D’Anville (1746, ©1755), Bellin (1750-55), John Rocque
(1754-61), Bowen and Gibson (1755), St Le Roque (1755), Mitchell
(1755, 1777), Bowles (1763%), D’Anville altered by Bell (1768),
D’Anville by Evans (1771), and Andrews (1777). Another appears
on the Ocmulgee, oftenest on a small southern affluent of it, in the
maps of Moll (1720), Popple (1733), Bellin (1750-55), and in Ho-
mann’s Atlas (1759). This seems to mean that there was a Tuskegee
village among the Lower Creeks, originally on Ocmulgee River, and
after the Yamasee war on the Chattahoochee. The town is referred
to in a letter of Matheos, the Apalachee lieutenant under the governor
of Florida, written May 19, 1686.1. Evidently it was then on or near
the Ocmulgee. In a letter of September 20, 1717, Diego Pena in
narrating his journey to the Lower Creeks says that he spent the
night at ‘“Tayquique,”’ evidently intended for Tasquique, “within
a short league” of Coweta. It must have been on the Chattahoo-
chee, at a place given on none of the maps.’

TENNESSEE RIVER TRIBES OF UNCERTAIN RELA-
TIONSHIP

We have had occasion to notice several tribes or portions of tribes
in the valley of the Tennessee or even farther north whose history is in
some way bound up with that of the better-known peoples of the Creek
Confederacy. Thus the Tamahita came from the upper Tennessee
or one of its branches, part of the Koasati and part of the Tuskegee
were on the Tennessee, and there are indications that the same was
true of part of the Tamali. Perhaps another case of the kind is fur-
nished by the Oconee.’ Still another people divided into a northern
and southern band were the Yuchi, whose principal residence was
Savannah River, but part of whom were on the Tennessee. There
were, however, two tribes in the north not certainly represented
among the southern Muskhogeans and not certainly Muskhogean,
but of sufficient importance in connection with the general problem
of southern tribes to receive notice here.

One of these was the Tali, a tribe which appears first in the De
Soto narratives. It is not mentioned by Biedma or Garcilasso, and
Elvas gives it but scant attention,* but from what Ranjel says it was
evidently of some importance. His account is as follows:

Friday, July 9 [1540], the commander and his army departed from Coste and crossed the
other branch of the river and passed the night on its banks. And on the other side
was Tali, and since the river flows near it and is large, they were not able to cross it.
And the Indians, believing that they would cross, sent canoes and in them their wives

1Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 194-195.

2Tbid., p. 229. For amore particular account of the later condition and ethnology of these people
see Speck, The Creek Indians of Taskigi town, in Mem. Am. Anthr. Asso., 1, pt. 2.

3 See p. 179.

4 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, pp. 80-81.

212 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

and sons and clothes from the other side; but they were all taken suddenly, and as
they were going with the current, the governor forced them all to turn back, which
was the reason that this chief came in peace and took them across to the other side in
his canoes, and gave the Christians what they had need of. And he did this also in
his own land as they passed through it afterwards, and they set out Sunday and passed
the night in the open country.

Monday they crossed a river and slept in the open country. Tuesday they crossed
another river and slept at Tasqui. During all the days of their march from Tali the
chief of Tali had corn and mazamorras and cooked beans, and everything that could
be brought from his villages bordering the way.'

The Tali now disappear from sight and are not heard of again until
late in the seventeenth century, when they are found in approxti-
mately the same position as 150 years earlier.? Daniel Coxe gives
them as one of four small nations occupying as many islands in the
Tennessee River.’ He represents them as the nation farthest up-
stream. In the summer of 1701 five Canadians ascended the Ten-
nessee and reached South Carolina, and from one of these Sauvolle,
Iberville’s brother, who had been left in command of the French fort
at Biloxi, obtained considerable information regarding the tribes then
settled along that river. He embodied it in an official letter dated
at Biloxi, August 4, 1701. From this it appears that the Canadians
first came upon a Chickasaw town ‘‘about 140 leagues” from the mouth
of the Ohio, then upon the ‘‘ Taougalé,” a band of Yuchi, an unspeci-
fied distance higher up, and ‘‘after that the Talé, where an English-
man is established to purchase slaves, as mney make war with many —
other nations.” +

On the maps of the latter part of the Reenter: and early part of
the eighteenth centuries this name is persistent. The tribe is gen-
erally placed above the Tahogale, now known to have been a band of
Yuchi, and below the Kaskinampo and Shawnee. The name of the
Tennessee band of Koasati rarely appears. In another set of maps
we find a different group of towns, one of which is called Taligui,
and in still another, from the French, a set in which a town Talicouet
isin evidence. There can be no doubt that Talicouet is the Cherokee
town Tellico, since the maps show it in the proper position, and of
the three other towns one, Aiouache, is evidently Hiwassee or
Ayuhwa’si; while another, Amobi, is the Cherokee town Amoye which
appears onsome maps. The fourth, Tongeria, is the Tahogale of other
cartographers. Taligui is evidently intended for the same town as
Talicouet. These two forms combined with a well-known Algon-
quian suffix would produce a name almost identical with that of
the Talligewi of Delaware tradition. Mr. Mooney believes that the
Talligewi were the Cherokee,” and this would tend | to 9 confirm the iden-

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, pp. 111-112.

2 Here, as throughout the present paper, I accept that theory of De Soto’s route which carries him as
far north as the Tennessee.

3 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1850, p. 230.

4MS. in Library of the La. Hist. Soc.; Louisiane, Correspondence Générale, 1678-1706, pp. 403-404; cf.
French, Hist. Colls. La., 1851, p. 238. In French the name Talés has been miscopied “Calés.’”’

519th Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 184-185.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 9183

tification, since the whole tribe may have received its name from the
Tellico towns. This is a matter which does not, however, concern us
here. The important question is, Were the Tali, Taligui, and Tali-
couet identical? If so,then the Tali are at once established as Cher-
okee. That the Cherokee country extended in later times as far
as the great bend of the Tennessee is well known, but this fact neces-
sarily tends to cast doubt upon any earlier tradition of such an exten-
sion, since it assumes an intervening period of abandonment.
Still it is interesting to know that there was such a tradition. In
an article on “The Indians of Marshall County, Alabama,” by Mr.
O. D. Street, of Guntersville, Alabama, we read:

The late Gen. 8. K. Rayburn, who came to this country many years before the re-
moval of the Cherokees to the West and was intimately acquainted with many of them,
told the writer that he had been informed by intelligent Cherokees that, many thousand
moons before, their people had occupied all the country westward to Bear Creek and
Duck River, but that on account of constant wars with the Chickasaws they had sought
quiet by withdrawing into the eastern mountains, though they had never renounced
their title to the country.!

Our investigation has now brought out the following facts. On
early maps four or five small tribes appear on the middle course of
Tennessee River. One of these, Tali, bears the same name as a tribe
found by De Soto near the big bend of the same stream. Maps
of a somewhat later date show the same number of towns, but they
are not all identical. Three are, however, evidently Cherokee towns,
and one, Taligui or Talicouet, is certainly the Cherokee town of
Tellico (Talikwa). We also have traditional evidence that the Chero-
kee were in possession at an early date of that region where the Tali
lived. If the Taligui and Talicouet of later maps are the same as the
Tali of earlier ones the identification is complete ; if there was merely a
chance resemblance between the names they were, of course, distinct.
The chances, in my opinion, are very much in favor of the identifica-
tion.

The name of another problematical tribe is spelled variously Kaski-
nampo, Caskinampo, Kaskin8ba, Caskemampo, Cakinonpa, Kaki-
nonba, Karkinonpols, Kasquinanipo. It is applied also to the
Tennessee River. Coxe speaks of the Tennessee as a river ‘‘some call
Kasqui, so named from a nation inhabiting a little above its mouth.” ?
This spelling serves to connect the tribe with one mentioned by De
Soto, and called in the writings of his expedition Casqui,’ Icasqui,‘ or
Casquin.® The Spaniards reached the principal town of Casqui about
a week after they had crossed the Mississippi, while moving north.
The Casqui were at that time engaged in war with another province
or tribe known as Pacaha. In the principal town of Casqui near the

| Trans. Ala. Hist. Soc., Iv, p. 195. 4 Ibid., 0, p. 26.

2 Coxe in French, Hist. Colls. La., 1850, p. 229. 5 Shipp, De Soto and Fla., p. 408.
8 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 128; 0, p. 188.

214 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

chief's house was an artificial mound on which De Soto had a cross
set. Ranjel says, ‘It was Saturday when they entered his village,
and it had very good cabins and in the principal one, over the door,
were many heads of very fierce bulls, just as in Spain noblemen who
are sportsmen mount the heads of wild boars or bears. There the
Christians planted the cross on a mound, and they received it and
adored it with much devotion, and the blind and lame came to seek
to be healed.” !

Afterwards De Soto went on to Pacaha and finally made peace
between the two, a peace which we may surmise did not last much
longer than the presence of De Soto insured it. While at Pacaha
the Spaniards learned of a province to the north called Calug¢a? or
Calu¢.2 This would seem to be the Choctaw or Chickasaw Oka lusa,
“black water,’’ from which we may possibly infer the Muskhogean
connection of Casquin, but, on the other hand, the name may have
been obtained from interpreters secured east of the Mississippi, and
may be nothing more than a translation of the original into Chick-
asaw. After this sudden and rather dramatic appearance of the
tribe we are studying upon the page of history, they disappear into
the dark, and all that is preserved to us from a later period is the
reference of Coxe, two or three other short notices, and the persistent
clinging of their name in its ancient form to the Tennessee; but
scarcely anything is known regarding them, either as to their affini-
ties or ultimate fate. A French description of the province of Louisi-
ana dated about 1712 states that the ‘‘Caskinanpau”’ were then liv-
ing upon the river now called the Tennessee, but that the Cumberland
was known as ‘‘the River of the Caskinanpau”’ because they had
formerly lived there.t In the letter of Sauvolle, already quoted, the
““Cassoty”’ and ‘‘Casquinonpa”’ are represented as ‘‘on an island
which the river forms, on the two extremities of which are situated
these two nations.’”’®> On very many maps they appear associated
with the Shawnee, and on several a trail is laid down from the Ten-
nessee to St. Augustine, with a legend to the effect that ‘“‘by this
trail the Shawnee and Kasquinampos go to trade with the Spaniards.”

Besides these well-defined, though unidentified, tribes we find a few
names on early maps which are perhaps synonyms for some of those
already considered. One is “‘8abarighiharea,’’ placed on Tennessee
River and perhaps identical with the ‘‘Wabano”’ of La Salle. It
contains the Algonquian word for ‘‘east.’’ On the same map and on
the same river is ‘‘Matahale,’”’ perhaps the ‘‘Matohah”’ of Joliet’s
map.

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, pp. 138-139.

2 Ibid., 1, p. 128.

3 Tbid., I, p. 30.

4 French Transcription, Lib. Cong.

5 MS. in Lib. La. Hist. Soc., Louisiane, Correspondence Générale, pp. 403-404.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 915
THE MUSKOGEE

The dominant people of the Creek Confederacy called themselves
and their language in later times by a name which has become con-
ventionalized into Muscogee or Muskogee, but it does not appear in
the Spanish narratives of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries,
and careful examination seems to show that the people themselves
were complex. If we were in possession of full internal information
regarding their past history I feel confident we should find that the
process of aggregation which brought so many known foreign elements
together had been operating through a much longer period and had
brought extraneous elements in still earlier. Evidence pointing
toward a foreign origin for several supposedly pure Muskogee tribes
will be adduced presently. At the same time we are now no longer
in a position to separate the two clearly, and will consider all under
one head. We do know, however, that even though they spoke the
Muskogee language, there were several distinct bands, the history
of each of which must be separately traced.

The name Muskogee was of later origin, presumably, than the
names of the constituent parts. What it means no Creek Indian
seems to know. In fact it does not appear to be a Muskogee
word at all. Several explanations have been suggested for it,
but the one to which [I am inclined to give most weight is
that of Gatschet,’ who affirms that it is derived from an Algonquian
word signifying “swamp” or ‘“‘wet ground.” Gatschet devotes con-
siderable space to a discussion of the name. It was probably first
bestowed by the Shawnee, who were held in high esteem by the
Creeks, especially by those of Tukabahchee, and probably came into
use for want of a native term to cover all of the Muskogee tribes.

The origin of the English term ‘‘Creeks’’ seems to have been satis-
factorily traced by Prof. V. W. Crane to a shortening of ‘‘Ocheese
Creek Indians,” Ocheese being an old name for the Ocmulgee River,
upon which most of the Lower Creeks were living when the English
first came in contact with them.’

A careful examination of the Muskogee bodies proper yields us
about 12 whose separate existence extends back so far that we
must treat them independently, although we may have a conviction
that they were not all originally major divisions. On the other hand,
there are a few bands not included among the 12 which may have
had an independent origin, though this seems very unlikely. The
12 bodies above referred to are the Kasihta, Coweta, Coosa, Abihka,
Wakokai, Eufaula, Hilibi, Atasi, Kolomi, Tukabahchee, Pakana, and
Okchai. As we know, they were in later times distinguished into
Upper Creeks and Lower Creeks, the former including those residing

1 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., pp. 58-62.
2 Crane in The Miss. Val. Hist. Rev., vol. 5, no. 3, Dec., 1918.

216 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

on the Coosa, Tallapoosa, and Alabama Rivers, and in the neighboring
country, and the latter those on the Chattahoochee and Flint. The
‘Upper Creeks” of Bartram are the Creeks proper, while his ‘‘ Lower
Creeks” are the Seminole. Sometimes a triple division is made into
Upper Creeks, Middle Creeks, and Lower Creeks, the first including
those on the Coosa River, the Middle Creeks those on and near the
Tallapoosa, and the last as in the previous classification. The first
are also called Coosa or Abihka, the second Tallapoosa, and the last
Coweta. The traditions of nearly all, so far as information has come
down to us, pomt to an origin in the west, but these will be taken up
in a separate volume when we come to treat of Creek social organiza-
tion. That the drift of population throughout most of this area had
been from west to east can hardly be doubted, but it is plain that prac-
tically all of the Muskogee tribes had completed the movement before
De Soto’s time, though all can not be identified in the narratives of his
expedition. The prime factors in the formation of the confederacy
were the Kasihta and Coweta, which I will consider first.

THe KaAsIHTA

The honorary name of this tribe in the Creek Confederacy was
Kasihta tako, ‘‘ Big Kasibta.’’ According to the earliest form of the
Creek migration legend that is available—that related to Governor
Oglethorpe by Chikili in 1735—the Kasihta and Coweta came from
the west ‘‘as one people,” but in time those dwelling toward the east
came to be called Kasihta and those to the west Coweta. This an-
cient unity of origin appears to have been generally admitted down
to the present time. According to John Goat, an aged Tulsa Indian,
they were at first one town, and when they separated the pot of
medicine which had been buried under their busk fire was dug up
and its contents divided between them. He also maintained that
anciently Kasihta was the larger and more important of the two,
and others state the same, while on the point of numbers, they are
confirmed by the census of 1832.2? Oftener the Coweta were given
precedence.

The first appearance of the Kasihta i documentary history is, I
believe, in the De Soto chronicles as the famous province of Cofita-
chequi,? Cutifachiqui,t Cofitachyque,* Cofitachique,’? or Cofaciqui.®
Formerly it was generally held that this was Yuchi. The name has,
however, a Muskhogean appearance, and Dr. F. G. Speck, our leading
Yuchi authority, is unable to find any Yuchi term resembling
it. In fact, with one doubtful exception, he is unable to discover

1 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, pp. 244-251. 4 Tbid., 1, p. 69.
2 See p. 430. 6 Ibid., u, p. 11.
3 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, ll, p. 93. 6 Garcilasso in Shipp, De Soto and Fla., p. 352.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 217

any name in the De Soto narratives which resembles a Yuchi word
even remotely.'

The specific identification of this place with Kasihta rests mainly
upon the early documents of the colony of South Carolina. In a
letter from Henry Woodward, interpreter for the colonists, to Sir
John Yeamans, dated September 10, 1670, the writer states that he
had visited ‘“‘Chufytachyqj y' fruitfull Provence where ye Emperour
resides.’ ‘‘It lys,’’ he says, ‘‘West & by Northe nearest from us 14
days trauell after ye Indian manner of marchinge.”’* He is writing
from near where Charleston, S. C., was afterwards built. In a letter
to the Lords Proprietors from the same place, dated September 11,
1670, the Council of the new colony mentions this expedition again,
and calls the country ‘‘Chufytachyque.’’* It is also referred to in a
letter written to Lord Ashley by Stephen Bull, only that the distance
is given as ten days’ journey.‘ In a letter from William Owen to
Lord Ashley, written September 15, 1670, we read:

The Emperour of Tatchequiha, a verie fruitfull countrey som 8 days iourney to ye
Northwest of vs, we expect here within 4 days, som of his people being alreadie com
with whom he would haue bein had not he heard in his way yt ye Spaniard had de-
feated vs. His friend?P with us is very considerable against ye Westoes if euer they
intend to Molest us. He hath often defeated them and is euer their Master. The
Indian Doctor tells us yt where he liues is exceedinge rich and fertill generally of a
red mould and hillie with most pleasant vallies and springes haueing plentie of white
and black Marble and abundantly stored with Mulberries of w*" fruite they make cakes
wh T have tasted.®

From the context it is evident that Tatchequiha and Chufytachyqj
were the same. Mr. Thomas Colleton adds the information that this
potentate had a thousand bowmen in his town.’ In the memoranda
in John Locke’s handwriting we find other spellings, ‘‘Caphatach-
aques,’’’ and Chufytuchyque.* In still another place he speaks of
“the Emperor Cotachico at Charles town with 100 Indians.’’® In his
instructions to Henry Woodward, dated May 23, 1674, Lord Shaftes-
bury says:

You are to consider whether it be best to make a peace with the Westoes or
Cussitaws, which are a more powerful nation said to have pearle and silver and by
whose Assistance the Westoes may be rooted out, but no peace is to be made with
either of them without Including our Neighbour Indians who are at amity with us.!°

Rivers has the following:

Order for trade with the Westoes & Cussatoes Indians, 10 April 1677.
Whereas ye discovery of ye Country of ye Westoes & ye Cussatoes two powerful
and warlike nations, hath bine made at ye charge of ye Earle of Shaftsbury, &c.,

1The exception is the name Yubaha which I 6 Ibid., p. 249.

have discovered to be from Timucua; see p. 81. 7 Tbid., p. 258.
2S.C. Hist. Soc. Colls., vy, p. 186. 8 Ibid., p. 262.
3 Tbid., p. 191. 9 Thid., p. 388.
4 Tbid., p. 194. 10 Tbid., p. 446.

6 Ibid., p. 201.

918 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 78

and by the Industry & hazard of Dt. Henry Woodward, and a strict peace & amity
made Betweene those said nations and our people in of province of Corolina, &e.1

We could wish there were more information, but this is sufficient
to show that the early English colonists called the Kasihta by a name
corresponding very closely with that used by De Soto’s companions.
They give the tribe so called the prominent position which it had in
his day and which it afterwards occupied, and distinguish it clearly
from the Westo, who I believe to have been Yuchi.? We have,
therefore, a valid reason for concluding that the Cofitachequi and
Kasihta were one and the same people.

That this was not the only body of Kasihta Indians in the Creek
country seems to be shown by the name of a town, Casiste, which
the Spaniards in De Soto’s time passed through somewhere near
the Tallapoosa.’

On Saturday, May 1, 1540, after having lost his way and spent some
days floundering about among the wastes of southeastern Georgia,
De Soto with the advance guard of his army came to the river on the
other side of which was Cofitachequi, was met by the chieftainess
of that place—or by her niece, for authorities differ—-and was re-
ceived into her town in peace. May 3 the rest of the army came up
and they were given half of the town. On the 12th or 13th they left.
They found here a temple or ossuary which the Spaniards call a
‘‘mosque and oratory,’’ and which they opened, finding there bodies
covered with pearls and a number of objects of European manufacture,
from which they inferred that they were near the place in which
Ayllon and his companions had come to grief. Elvas says of the
people of that province:

The inhabitants are brown of skin, well formed and proportioned. They are more
civilized than any people seen in all the territories of Florida, wearing clothes and

shoes. This country, according to what the Indians stated, had been very populous,
but it had been decimated shortly before by a pestilence.®

The location of Cofitachequi has been discussed by many writers.
Most of the older maps place it upon the upper Santee or the Saluda,
in what is now South Carolina, but this is evidently too far to the
east and north. Later opinion has inclined to the view that it was
on the Savannah, and the point oftenest fixed upon is what is now
known as Silver Bluff. The present writer in a paper published
among the Proceedings of the Mississippi Valley Historical Associ-
ation® expressed the opinion that it was on or near the Savannah but
lower down than Silver Bluff, on the ground that the Yuchi, who have

1 Rivers, Hist. of S. C., p. 389.

2 See pp. 288-291.

3 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, p. 87; U, p. 116. Elvas calls it ‘‘a large town’’; Ranjel, ‘‘a small village.”
In later Spanish documents the name of Kasihta is spelled Casista.

4 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, p. 69; 0, pp. 18-15, 98-102.

5 Ibid., 1, pp. 66-67.

6 Proc. Miss. Val. Hist. Asso., V, pp. 147-157.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 219

usually been regarded as earlier occupants of this territory than the
Creeks, extended down the river as far as Ebenezer Creek.

Later researches have tended to show, however, that in De Soto’s
time the Yuchi were not on the Savannah River at all, while the Pardo
narratives indicate that the position of Cofitachequi was at least as far
inland as Barnwell or Hampton Counties, S. C. Elvas says that the
sea ‘‘was stated to be two days’ travel” from Cofitachequi,' and
Biedma has this: ‘‘ From the information given by the Indians, the sea
should be about 30 leagues distant.’’

In Vandera’s account of the Pardo expedition of 1566—67 Cofitache-
qui is said to be 50 leagues from Santa Elena and 20 from the mouth
of the river on which it was located.’ It is probable that the first of
these figures is too high and the second too low. All things considered,
Silver Bluff would seem to be too far inland; a point is indicated
between Mount Pleasant and Sweet Water Creek, in Barnwell or
Hampton Counties, S. C.

From the prominent position assigned to Cofitachequi by the De
Soto chroniclers, by Pardo and Vandera, and by the later English
settlers, it is altogether probable that this was the town which
Laudonniére and the Frenchmen left at Charlesfort believed was
being described to them as lying inland and ruled by a great chief
called Chiquola. Laudonniére says:

Those who survived from the first voyage have assured me that the Indians have
made them understand by intelligible signs that farther inland in the same northerly
direction was a great inclosure, and within it many beautiful houses, in the midst of
which lived Chiquola.*

Laudonniére evidently stumbled upon the name Chiquola from
having asked about the Chicora of the Ayllon expedition, with the
story of which he was familiar. The Indians, who probably had no
r in their language, changed the sound to / and at the same time
perhaps gave him a distorted form of one name for the Kasihta, a
name which we seem to find again in the form ‘‘Tatchequiha”’ in
Owen’s letter to Lord Ashley.* The location indicated also agrees
very well with that in which Pardo found Cofitachequi a few years
later. Vandera gives the following account of the country occupied
by these people in his time:

From Guiomaez he started directly for Canos, which the Indians call Canosi, and
by another name Cofetazque; there are three or four rather large rivers within this
province, one of them even carrying much water or rather two are that way; there
are few swamps, but anybody, even a child, can pass them afoot. There are deep

valleys surrounded by rocks and stones, and cliffs. The soil is reddish and fertile,
very much better than all those before mentioned.

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 66. 4 Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, p. 31.
2 Tbid., 0, p. 14. 5 See p. 217.
3 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, p. 482.

220 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Canos is a country through which flows one of the two powerful rivers; it contains
that and many small rivulets; it has great meadows and very good ones, and here and
from here on, the maize is abundant; the grapes are plentiful, big, and very good;
there are also bad ones, thick skinned and small, in fact, there are very many varie-
ties. It is a country in which a big town can be settled. To Santa Elena there are
50 leagues and to the sea about twenty, and it is possible to reach it by way of the big
river crossing the country and [to go] much further inland by the same river; and
equally could one go by the other river which passes near Guiomaez. !

The first of these rivers can have been only the Savannah; the
second probably the Coosawhatchie, the Salkehatchie, or Briar
Creek. The name Canosi is perhaps perpetuated in Cannouchee
River, a branch of the Ogeechee, upon which the Kasihta may once
have dwelt.

In 1628 Pedro de Torres was sent inland by the governor of Florida,
Luis de Rojas y Borjas. He went as far as ‘‘Cafatachiqui’ (or
‘““Cosatachiqui’’), ‘‘more than two hundred leagues inland,” and
the governor states in his letter to the king describing this expedi-
tion that the men in his party were the first Spaniards to visit it
since De Soto’s time. This last statement is, of course, an error.
The governor says little more except that all the chiefs in the country
were under the chief of Cofitachequi, and the rivers there abounded
in pearls, which the natives appear to have gathered in a manner
described by Garcilasso.?

By the time the English came to South Carolina it is evident that
the Kasihta had changed their location. This is apparent both from
Henry Woodward’s Westo narrative and from what we learn of his
visit to them. The Westo were then on Savannah River; the
Kasihta, or ‘‘Chufytachyqj”’ as he calls them, were 14 days’ travel
west by north ‘‘after ye Indian manner of marchinge.”? The loca-
tion is uncertain, but must have been near the upper Savannah.
It was certainly farther away than that of the Westo and more to
the north. In Elbert County, Ga., on Broad River, a few miles south
of Oglesby, is an old village site which would answer very well to
the probable location of the tribe at this period. At any rate, from
1670 until some time before 1686 the Kasihta were in northern Georgia,
near Broad River, perhaps ranging across to the Tennessee. Maps
of the period locate the Kasihta and Coweta in this area, about the
heads of the Chattahoochee and Coosa. South Carolina documents
place this tribe on Ocheese Creek in 1702, Ocheese Creek being an old
name for the upper part of the Ocmulgee,‘ and it seems probable from
an examination of the Spanish documents that they were settled
there as early as 1680-1685. From the context of a letter written
May 19, 1686, by Antonio Matheos, lieutenant of Apalachee, to

1 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, p. 482. 3§. C. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 186.
2 Garcilasso in Shipp, De Soto and Fila., pp. 4 Jour. of the Commons House of Assembly, MS.
371-373.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS ADM

Cabrera, the governor of Florida, it appears that, shortly before,
the Spaniards had undertaken an expedition against the Creek
Indians and had burned several of their villages. The letter states
that two of four Apalachee Indians sent among the Apalachicolas
fi. e., Lower Creeks] as spies had returned the day before. He con-
tinues as follows:

They report that they have visited, as I ordered them to do, all the places of said
province, where they were well received, except at Casista and Caveta. The people
of these two places had sent them two messengers before they reached the said vil-
lages, telling them that they did not want them to come there, because they were
from Apalache and consequently their enemies. Thus they should not try to go
there, for they would not have peace. Notwithstanding, the spies resolved to go
there, risking whatever might happen to them, sending word with the last messenger
[sent them] that they were not Apalachinos, but Thamas, and that they did not come
for any other reason than to see their relatives and buy several things, and that there-
fore they should permit them to come. And the two spies arriving near these two
places at the time when they [the inhabitants of both villages] were playing ball,
they remained there until the game was ended without anybody in the meantime com-
ing to them, although one of them had relatives there. And when they approached
Casista, the cacique of that village came to meet them before they could enter it,
and he asked them where they were going. Had he not told them not to come into
his village? That besides there not being anything to eat in the village, nobody
would speak to them; that he knew that they were sent for a certain purpose; that
consequently they were his enemies and should not come to his village. Being
given a canoe to cross the river, they went to Tasquique, where, as well as in Colome,
they were very well received and entertained. These people told them that although
the Christians had burnt their villages they were patient [forbearing], because they
knew it was their own fault, although it had been mainly the fault of the caciques
of Casista and Caveta, who had deceived and involved the rest of them, bringing the
English in and forcing them to receive them and go into the forests, for which cause
their village had been burnt down. That if another occasion should arise [that
the Spaniards should come] they would not flee for they knew now how the Spaniards
acted. At Caveta they received them the same way as in Casista, giving them to un-
derstand that although they were sowing, they had no intention of remaining there.
The said spies say that in those two places there is not a thing done or begun, whereas
at the other two, i. e. Colome and Tasquique, there are a great many [things] as well
accomplished as started.!

From the text it is impossible to say where the four towns men-
tioned were located, but the reference to a river combined with our
later knowledge regarding these Indians indicates the Ocmulgee.

In 1695 an expedition, composed of 7 Spaniards and 400 Indians,
marched against the Lower Creeks to seek revenge for injuries in-
flicted upon them in numerous attacks. They reached the town
sites of the ‘‘Cauetta, Oconi, Casista, and Tiquipache.” In one
they captured about 50 Indians; the others were found burned
and abandoned.? After the Yamasee war the Kasihta settled on the

1Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 193-195; also Lowery MSS. The first writer dates this letter 1606
instead of 1686.
2 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 225.

299 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Chattahoochee. Maps representing the location of tribes at that
time give the Kasihta under the name Gitasee. This is made evi-
dent when we come to compare early and late maps, which are
found to agree in nearly all particulars except that some variant of
the name Kasihta is substituted for Gitasee. The reason for the
use of Gitasee is entirely unknown. As laid down on these maps the
Kasihta were between the Okmulgee on the south and a body of
Tuskegee on the north. In the census list of 1761 they were assigned
to John Rae as trader.!’ In January, 1778, Bartram passed this town,
which he calls ‘‘Usseta,’”’ and he says that it jommed Chiaha, but that
the two spoke radically different languages. The traders located
there in 1797 were Thomas Carr and John Anthony Sandoval, the
latter a Spaniard. Hawkins gives the following description of Ka-
sihta as it was in 1799, which shows incidentally that the town had
been moved once after it was located on the river:

Cus-se-tuh; this town is two and a half miles below Cow-e-tuh Tal-lau-has-see, on
the left bank of the river. They claim the land above the falls on their side. In
descending the river path from the falls in three miles you cross a creek running to

the right, twenty feet wide; this creek joins the river a quarter of a mile above the
Cowetuh town house; the land to this creek is good and level and extends back from

the river from half to three-quarters of a mile to the pine forest; the growth on the

level is oak, hickory, and pine; there are some ponds and slashes back next to the
pine forest, bordering on a branch which runs parallel with the river; in the pine
forest there is some reedy branches.

The creek has its source nearly twenty miles from the river, and runs nearly paral-
lel with it till within one mile ofits junction; there it makes a short bend round north,
thence west to the river; at the second bend, about two hundred yards from the river,
a fine little spring creek joins on its right bank. . . .

The flat of good land on the river continues two and a half miles below this creek,
through the Cussetuh fields to Hat-che-thluc-co. At the entrance of the fields on
the right there is an oblong mound of earth; one-quarter of a mile lower there is a
conic mound forty-five yards in diameter at the base, twenty-five feet high, and flat
on the top, with mulberry trees on the north side and evergreens on the south. From
the top of this mound they have a fine view of the river above the flat land on both
sides of the river, and all the field of one thousand acres;* the river makes a short
bend round to the right opposite this mound, and there is a good ford just below
the point. It is not easy to mistake the ford, as there is a flat on the left, of gravel
and sand; the waters roll rapidly over the gravel, and the eye, at the first view,
fixes on the most fordable part; there are two other fords below this, which communi-
cate between the fields on both sides of the river; the river from this point comes round
to the west, then to the east; the island ford is below this turn, at the lower end of a
small island; from the left side, enter the river forty yards below the island, and
go up to the point of it, then turn down as the ripple directs, and land sixty yards
below; this is the best ford; the third is still lower, from four to six hundred yards.

The land back from the fields to the east rises twenty feet and continues flat for
one mile to the pine forest; back of the fields, adjoining the rise of twenty feet, is a
beaver pond of forty acres, capable of being drained at a small expense of labor; the
large creek bounds the fields and the flat land to the south.

1 Ga. Col. Does., vil, p. 522. 3 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 171.
2 Bartram, Travels, p. 456. 4 The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘100 acres.”’

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 993

Continuing on down the river from the creek, the land rises to a high flat, formerly
the Cussetuh town, and afterwards a Chickasaw town. This flat is intersected with
one branch. From the southern border of this flat, the Cussetuh town is seen below,
on a flat, just above flood mark, surrounded with this high flat to the north and east,
and the river to the west: the land about the town is poor, and much exhausted; they
cultivate but little here of early corn; the principal dependence is on the rich fields
above the creek; to call them rich must be understood in a limited sense; they have
been so, but being cultivated beyond the memory of the oldest man in Cussetuh, they
are almost exhausted; the produce is brought from the fields to the town in canoes or on
horses; they make barely a sufficiency of corn for their support; they have no fences
around their fields, and only a fence of three poles, tied to upright stakes, for their
potatoes; the land up the river, above the fields, is fine for culture, with oak, hickory,
blackjack and pine.

The people of Cussetuh associate, more than any other Indians, with their white
neighbors, and without obtaining any advantage from it; they know not the season
for planting, or, if they do, they never avail themselves of what they know, as they
always plant a month too late.

This town with its villages is the largest in the Lower Creeks; the people are and
have been friendly to white people and are fond of visiting them; the old chiefs are
very orderly men and much occupied in governing their young men, who are rude and
disorderly, in proportion to the intercourse they have had with white people; they
frequently complain of the intercourse of their young people with the white people on
the frontiers, as being very prejudicial to their morals; that they are more rude, more
inclined to be tricky, and more difficult to govern, than those who do not associate
with them.

The settlements belonging to the town are spread out on the right side of the river;
here they appear to be industrious, have forked fences, and more land enclosed than
they can cultivate. One of them desires particularly to be named Mic E-maut-lau.
This old chief has, with his own labor, made a good worm fence, and built himself a
comfortable house; they have but a few peach trees, in and about the town; the main
trading path, from the upper towns, passes through here; they estimate their number
of gun men at three hundred; but they cannot exceed one hundred and eighty.

Au-put-tau-e [Apatana, bull frog village?];! a village of Cussetuh, twenty miles from
the river, on Hat-che thluc-co; they have good fences, and the settlers under Jenjoy?|
the best characters of any among the Lower Creeks; they estimate their gun men at
forty-three. On a visit here the agent for Indian affairs was met by all the men, at
the house of Tus-se-kiah Micco. That chief addressed him in these words: Here, I
am glad to see you; this is my wife, and these are my children; they are glad to see
you; these are the men of the village; we have forty of them in all; they are glad to see
you; you are now among those on whom you may rely. I have been six years at this
village, and we have not a man here, or belonging to our village, who ever stole a
horse from, or did any injury to a white man.

The village is in the forks of Hatche thlucco, and the situation is well chosen; the
land is rich, on the margins of the creeks and the cane flats; the timber is large, of
poplar, white oak, and hickory; the uplands to the south are the long-leaf pine; and
to the north waving oak, pine, and hickory; cane is on the creeks and reed in all the
branches.

At this village, and at the house of Tus-se-ki-ah Micco, the agent for Indian affairs
has introduced the plough; and a farmer was hired in 1797 to tend a crop of corn, and
with so good success, as to induce several of the villagers to prepare their fields for the
plough. Some of them have cattle, hogs and horses, and are attentive to them.

1 Gatschet derives this name from apatayas, I cover, and says it means ‘‘a sheet-like covering.’”’ A
native informant suggested to the writer apatana, bullfrog. This is probably the village which Hawkins
elsewhere calls Thlonotiscauhatche, after Flint River.—Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., ix, p. 172.

994 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 73

The range is a good one, but cattle and horses require salt; they have some thriving
peach trees, at several of the settlements.

On Auhe-gee creek, called at its junction with the river, Hitchetee, there is one
settlement which deserves a place here. It belongs to Mic-co thluc-co, called by the
white people, the ‘‘ Bird tail King [Fus hadji].’”’ The plantation is on the right side
of the creek, on good land, in the neighborhood of pine forest; the creek is a fine flowing
one, margined with reed; the plantation is well fenced, and cultivated with the plough;
this chief had been on a visit to New York, and seen much of the ways of white people,
and the advantages of the plough over the slow and laborious hand hoe. Yet he had
not firmness enough, till this year, to break through the old habits of the Indians.
The agent paid him a visit this spring, 1799, with a plough completely fixed, and spent
a day with him and showed him how to use it. He had previously, while the old
man was in the woods, prevailed on the family to clear the fields for the plough.
It has been used with effect, and much to the approbation of a numerous family,
who have more than doubled their crop of corn and potatoes; and who begin to know
how to turn their corn to account, by giving it to their hogs, cattle, and horses, and
begin to be very attentive to them; he has some apple and peach trees, and grape
vines, a present from the agent.

The Cussetuhs have some cattle, horses, and hogs; but they prefer roving idly
through the woods, and down on the frontiers, to attending to farming or stock raising.!

In notes taken two years earlier Hawkins thus speaks of another
Kasihta village, located on Flint River:

Salenojuh, 8 miles [below Aupiogee Creek]. Here was a compact town of Cusseta
people, of 70 gunmen in 1787, and they removed the spring after Colonel Alexander
killed 7 of their people near Shoulderbone. Their fields extended three miles above
the town; they had a hothouse and square, water, fields well fenced; their situation
fine for hogs and cattle. Just above the old fields there are two curves on each side of
the river of 150 acres, rich, which have been cultivated. Just below the town the
Sulenojuhnene ford, the lands level on the right bank. There is a small island to the
right of the ford; on the left aridge of rocks. The landson the left bank highand broken.
Above the town there is a good ford, level, shallow, and not rocky; the land flat on
both sides. ?

Another description of Kasihta is given by Hodgson, an English
missionary who passed through the Creek country in 1820. He says:

It [Kasihta]* appeared to consist of about 100 houses, many of them elevated on
poles from two to six feet high, and built of unhewn logs, with roofs of bark, and little
patches of Indian corn before the doors. The women were hard at work, digging the
ground, pounding Indian corn, or carrying heavy loads of water from the river; the
men were either setting out to the woods with their guns or lying idle before the
doors; and the children were amusing themselves in little groups. The whole scene
reminded me strongly of some of the African towns described by Mungo Park. In the
centre of the town we passed a large building, with a conical roof, supported by a cir-
cular wall about three feet high; close to it was a quadrangular space, enclosed by
four open buildings, with rows of benches rising above one another; the whole was
appropriated, we were informed, to the Great Council of the town, who meet under
shelter or in the open air, according to the weather. Near the spot was a high pole,
like our may-poles, with a bird at the top, round which the Indians celebrate their
Green-Corn Dance. The townortownship of Cosito is said to be able to muster 700

1 Ga, Hist. Soc. Colls., M1, pp. 52-61. For some recent information regarding the site of Kasihta, see
P. A. Brannon in Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol. xi, p. 195.

2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 172.

3 Hodgson spells the name Cosito.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS ppAy)

warriors, while the number belonging to the whole nation is not estimated at more
than 3,500.!

Seven separate Kasihta settlements are enumerated in the census
of 1832, as follows:

On little Euchee Creek, 211, besides 105 slaves; on Tolarnulkar Hatchee, 486, and
4 slaves;on Opillikee Hatchee, Tallassee town, 171; on Chowwokolohatchee, 118; at
Secharlitcha [‘‘ under black-jack trees” ], 214; on Osenubba Hatchee, or Tuckabatchee

Harjo’s town, 269, and 8 slaves; near West Point, or Tuskehenehaw Chooley’s town,
399; total, 1,868 Indians and 117 slaves.’

The principal chiefs and their households are omitted from the
enumeration. Gatschet mentions another branch called ‘‘Tusilgis |
_tco’ko or clapboard house.’’* After their removal they settled in the
northern part of the Creek Nation in the west with the other Lower
Creeks, where their descendants for the most part still are.

Tue Coweta 4

The Coweta were the second great Muskogee tribe among the
Lower Creeks, and they headed the war side as Kasihta headed the
peace side. Their honorary title in the confederacy was Kawita
ma‘ma’yi, ‘‘tall Coweta.”’ Although as a definitely identified tribe
they appear later in history and in the migration legends which have
been preserved to us the Kasihta are given precedence, the Coweta
were and still are commonly accounted the leaders of the Lower
_ Creeks and often of the entire nation. By many early writers all of
_ the Lower Creeks are called Coweta, and the Spaniards and French
both speak of the Coweta chief as ‘‘emperor”’ of the Creeks. An

- anonymous French writer of the eighteenth century draws the follow-

ing picture of his power at the time of the Yamasee uprising:

The nation of the Caoiiita is governed by an emperor, who in 1714 [1715] caused to
_ be killed all the English there were, not only in his nation, but also among the Abeca,
~Talapouches, Alibamons, and Cheraqui. Not content with that he went to commit
_ depredations as far as the gates of Carolina. The English were excited and wanted
_ to destroy them by making them drag pieces of ordinance loaded with grape-shot, by
‘ tying two ropes to the collar of the tube, on each one of which they put sixty savages,
whom they killed in the midst of their labors by putting fire to the cannon; butas they
saw they would take vengeance with interest, they made very great presents to the
emperor to regain his friendship and that of his nation. The French do the same
_ thing, and also the Spaniards, which makes him very rich, for the French who go to
visit him are served in a silver dish. He isa man of a good appearance and good char-
acter. He has numbers of slaves who are busy night and day cooking food for those

going and coming to visit him. He seldom goes on foot, always [riding on] well har-

nessed horses, and followed by many of his village. He is absolute in his nation. He

1 Hodgson, Remarks during Jour. through N. Am., pp. 265-266.
t 2 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess.; Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, iv, p. 578. In the sheets as published
- one figure is too large by 2 and one too small by 1. I have corrected these mistakes.
§ Marginal note in Creek Mig. Leg., 1, MS.
4Onthe maps I have spelled this phovetically, Kawita. The above is the form which has been
adopted into popular usage.

148061°—22 15

996 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULL. 73

has a quantity of cattle and kills them sometimes to feast his friends. No one has
ever been able to make him take sides with one of the three European nations who
know him, he alleging that he wishes to see everyone, to be neutral, and not to espouse
any of the quarrels which the French, English, and Spaniards have with one another.!

Traditionally the name is supposed to have had some connection
with the eastward nugration of this tribe, and it is associated with
the word ayeta, to go. No reliance can be placed upon this, how-
ever, any more than on Gatschet’s derivation from the Yuchi word
meaning ‘‘man.’’?

As the principal body of Muskogee in Georgia, aside from the
Kasihta, it is possible that these are the Chisi, Ichisi, or Achese of
the De Soto chroniclers,’ since Ochisi (Otci’si) is a name applied to
the Muskogee by Hitchiti-speaking peoples.‘ Spanish dealings
with them in the seventeenth century have already been recounted.®
In the period between 1670 and 1700 we find them placed on maps,
along with the Kasihta, about the headwaters of the Chattahoochee
and Coosa, but when they are first clearly localized they are on the
upper course of the Ocmulgee not far from Indian Springs, Butts
County, Georgia. On French maps the Altamaha and Ocmulgee
together are often called ‘‘Riviére des Caouitas.” After the general
westward movement, which took place after the Yamasee war, they
settled on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River between the
Yuchi on the south and a town known as Chattahoochee.

This last-mentioned place was the first Muskogee settlement on
Chattahoochee River and is said to have been established to enable
its occupants to open trade with the Spaniards. Bartram says that
the people of this town spoke the true Muskogee language, and it is
probable that it branched off from the Coweta, though it may have
been made up from several settlements. It was in Troup or Heard
Counties, Georgia, and was abandoned before Hawkins’s time,
1798-99.

The first Coweta settlement on the Chattahoochee was probably
at a place afterwards called Coweta Tallahassee, though at the period
last mentioned it was occupied by people from hikatcka, itself a
branch of Coweta.® D. I. Bushnell, Jr., has published parts of a
journal kept by a member of General Oglethorpe’s expedition to the
Creek towns in 1740, in which he gives some account of the people of

Coweta.’ In 1761 they had 130 hunters and their trader was George ©

Galpin... In 1797 Hawkins gives the names of five traders, Thomas

1 MS in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. The story about slaughtering Indians who were pulling a cannon

crops up in connection with the Popham colony (see Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc., Ist ser., I, p. 252).

2 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 19.

3 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, p. 10; 1, p. 54.

4 Hence the name ‘‘Ocheese River’ (p. 215). See Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 209; and
p. 148.

6 See pp. 220-222.

6 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., rx, p. 63.

7 Amer. Anthrop., n.s., vol. X, pp. 872-574, 1908.
8 Ga. Col. Docs., vim, p. 522.

——. Oe

ine Pv

ee Tae a

4
a

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 99,7

Marshall, John Tarvin, James Darouzeaux, Hardy Read, and Christian
Russel, the last a Silesian.t Adair enumerates Coweta as one of the
six principal towns of the Muskogee confederacy but does not mention
Kasihta.? Hawkins furnishes the following accounts of Coweta,
Coweta Tallahassee, and a branch of the latter known as Wetumpka,
as they appeared in 1799:

Cow-e-tuh, on the right bank of Chat-to-ho-che, three miles below the falls, on a
flat extending back one mile. The land is fine for corn; the settlements extend up
the river for two miles on the river flats. These are bordered with broken pine land;
the fields of the settlers who reside in the town, are on a point of land formed by a
bend of the river, a part of them adjoining the point, are low, then a rise of fifteen
feet, spreading back for half a mile, then another rise of fifteen feet, and flat a half
mile to a swamp adjoining the highlands; the fields are below the town.

The river is one hundred and twenty yards wide, with a deep steady current from
the fall; these are over a rough coarse rock, forming some islands of rock, which force
the water into two narrow channels, in time of low water. One is on each side of
the river, in the whole about ninety feet wide; that on the right is sixty feet wide,
with a perpendicular fall of twelve feet; the other of thirty feet wide, is a long sloping
curve very rapid, the fall fifteen feet in one hundred and fifty feet; fish may ascend
in this channel, but it is too swift and strong for boats; here are two fisheries; one on
the right belongs to this town; that on the left, to the Cussetuhs; they are at the
termination of the falls; and the fish are taken with scoop nets; the fish taken are the
hickory shad, rock, trout, perch, catfish, and suckers; there is sturgeon in the river,
but no white shad or herring; during spring and summer, they catch the perch and
rock with hooks. As soon as the fish make their appearance, the chiefs send out the
women, and make them fish for the square. This expression includes all the chiefs
and warriors of the town.

The land on the right bank of the river at the falls is a poor pine barren, to the
water’s edge; the pines are small; the falls continue three or four miles nearly of the
same width, about one hundred and twenty yards; the river then expands to thrice
that width, the bottom being gravelly, shoal and rocky. There are several small
islands within this scope; one at the part where the expansion commences is rich
and some part of it under cultivation; it is half a mile in length, but narrow; here the
river is fordable; enter the left bank one hundred yards above the upper end of the
island and cross over to it, and down to the fields, thence across the other channel;
at the termination of the falls, a creek twenty feet wide, (O-cow-ocuh-hat-che, falls
creek), joins the right side of the river. Just below this creek, and above the last
reef of rocks, is another ford. The current is rapid, and the bottom even.

On the left bank of the river at the falls, the land is level; and in approaching them
one is surprised to find them where there is no alteration in the trees or unevenness
of land. This level continues back one mile to the poor pine barren, and is fine for
corn or cotton; the timber is red oak, hickory, and pine; the banks of the river on this
side below the falls are fifty feet high, and continue so, down below the town house;
the flat of good land continues still lower to Hat-che thluc-co (big creek).

Ascending the river on this bank, above the falls, the following stages are noted in
miles:

24 miles, the flat land terminates: thence 34 miles, to Chis-se Hul-cuh running
to the left: thence 4 miles, to Chusse thluc-co twenty feet wide, a rocky bottom:

5 miles to Ke-ta-le, thirty feet wide, a bold, shoally rocky creek, abounding in
moss. Four miles up this creek there is a village of ten families at Hat-che Uxau

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, pp. 170-171. 2 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257.

228 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY j [BULL. 73

(head of a creek). The land is broken with hickory, pine, and chestnut; there is cane
on the borders of the creek and reed on the branches; there are some settlements of
Cowetuh people made on these creeks; all who have settled out from the town have
fenced their fields and begin to be attentive to their stock.

The town has a temporary fence of three poles, the first on forks, the other two on
stakes, good against cattle only; the town fields are fenced in like manner; a few of
the neighboring fields, detached from the town, have good fences; the temporary,
three pole fences of the town are made every spring, or repaired in a slovenly manner.

Cow-e-tuh Tal-lau-has-see; from Cow-e-tuh, Tal-lo-fau, a town, and hasse, old.
It is two and a half miles below Cowetuh, on the right bank of the river. In going
down the path between the two towns, in half a mile cross Kotes-ke-le-jau, ten feet
wide, running to the left is a fine little creek sufficiently large for a mill, inall but the
dryseasons. Ontheright bank enter the flat lands between the towns. These are good,
with oak, hard-shelled hickory and pine: they extend two miles to Che-luc-in-ti-ge-
tuh, a small creek five feet wide, bordering on the town. The town is half a mile
from the river, on the right bank of the creek; it is on a high flat, bordered on the east
by the flats of the river, and west by high broken hills; they have but a few settlers
in the town; the fields are on a point of land three-quarters of a mile below the town,
which is very rich and has been long under cultivation; they have no fence around
their fields.

Here is the public establishment for the Lower Creeks, and here the agent resides.
He has a garden well cultivated and planted, with a great variety of vegetables,
fruits, and vines, and an orchard of peach trees. Arrangements have been made to
fence two hundred acres of land fit for cultivation, and to introduce a regular hus-
bandry to serve as a model and stimulus, for the neighborhood towns who crowd the
public shops here, at all seasons, when the hunters are not in the woods.

The agent entertains doubts, already, of succeeding here in establishing a regular
husbandry, from the difficulty of changing the old habits of indolence, and sitting daily
in the squares, which seem peculiarly attractive to the residenters of the towns.
In the event of not succeeding, he intends to move the establishment out from the
town, and aid the villagers where success seems to be infallible.

They estimate their number of gun men at one hundred; but the agent has ascer-
tained, by actual enumeration, that they have but sixty-six, including all who reside
here, and in the villages belonging to the town.

They have a fine body of land below, and adjoining the town, nearly two thousand
acres, all well timbered; and including the whole above and below, they have more
than is sufficient for the accommodation of the whole town; they have one village
belonging to the town, We-tumcau.

We-tum-cau; from We-wau, water; and tum-cau, rumbling. It is on the main
branch of U-chee creek and is twelve miles northwest from the town. These people
have a small town house on a poor pine ridge on the left bank of the creek below the
falls; the settlers extend up the creek for three miles, and they cultivate the rich bends
in the creek; there is cane on the creek and fine reed on its branches; the land higher
up the creek, and on its branches is waving, with pine, oak, and hickory, fine for culti-
vation, on the flats and out from the branches; the range is good for stock, and some of
the settlers have cattle and hogs, and begin to be attentive to them; they have been
advised to spread out their settlements on the waters of this creek, and to increase
their attention to stock of every kind.

The trader in 1797 was James Lovet.2 Wetumpka is probably
the Wituncara of the Popple map (pl. 4).

The census of 1832 enumerated five bands of Coweta Indians, as
follows: Koochkalecha town, 276 besides 12 slaves; on Toosilkstor-

1 Ga, Hist. Soc. Colls., 11, pp. 52-57. 2Tbid., 1X, p. 63.

i = Sper ry

+ owe 4

N wipe cig’ Viol i aad "9

sfonde a Maa eas rhino?

poy
a ee

Ways

, SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 999

koo Hatchee, 85 and 15 slaves; on Warkooche Hatchee, 30; on Halle-
wokke Yoaxarhatchee, 191; at Cho-lose-parp Kar, or Kotchar,
Tus-tun-nuckee’s town, 275 and 24 slaves; total 857 Indians and 51
slaves. Chiefs’ families are not included.

The inferiority of this town in numbers to Kasihta was perhaps
due to the fact that it had given off another settlement which after-
wards constituted an independent town with its own busk ground.
This was Likatcka, or ‘‘ Broken Arrow” as the name has been rudely
translated into English. It is said to have been founded by some
families who went off by themselves to a place where they could break
reeds with which to make arrows. According to William Berryhill,
an old Coweta, however, it was not so much on account of the place
where they had settled as because they considered themselves to have
“broken away’”’ from the parent band in much the same manner as
a reed is broken. This town is said to have been situated on a trail
and ford 12 miles below Kasihta. It appears to be noted first by
Swan (1791).2 Hawkins in his Sketch of the Creek Country does
not speak of it, but in a journal dated 1797 says that the people of
Coweta Tallahassee had come fromit.? In the American State Papers *
he mentions it as having been destroyed in 1814, but it was soon
restored, for it was represented at the, treaty of November 15, 1827,°
and in the census of 1832. In this latter five settlements belonging

_ to the town are enumerated, but it is probable that only the first

two of these are correctly designated. One of these latter was on
Uchee Creek; the situation of the other is-not specified. Together
they numbered 418 inhabitants, not counting slaves and free negroes.°

Coweta and its chief, McIntosh, played a conspicuous part in the
removal of the Creek Indians to the west. McIntosh was the leader
of that party which favored removal and was killed by the conserva-
tive element in consequence. After the emigration Coweta and its

_ branches settled in the northern part of the new country on the

Arkansas, where most of their descendants still live. Their square

ground was first located about 2 miles west of the present town of

Coweta. After that site was fenced in and plowed up they moved
it to some low-lying land close to Coweta, and later busks of a rather
irregular character were held in other places, but the observance soon
died out. Nevertheless the busk medicines are, or until recently were,
still taken in an informal manner by the Coweta men four times a year,
corresponding to the times of the three ‘“‘stomp”’ dances and the busk.
According to one informant, shortly before the Civil War, Coweta,

1 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 379-386. A mistake in addition has been made on one
sheet, which I have rectified.

2 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

$ Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 63..

‘Am. State Papers, Ind. Affairs, 1, 858, 1832.

5 Indian Treaties, 1826, pp. 561-564.

§ Senate Doce. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 386-394.

230 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Kasihta, Tukabahehee, and Yuchi planned to come together in one
big town, but the war put an end to the project. In late times the
Coweta and Chiaha were such close friends that it is said “a man of
one town would not whip a dog belonging to the other.’ This friend-
ship also extended to the Osochi.

Tue Coosa AND THEIR DESCENDANTS

In De Soto’s time the most powerful Upper Creek town was Coosa.
The first news of this seems to have been obtained in Patofa (or
Tatofa), a province in southern Georgia, where the natives said
“that toward the northwest there was a province called Coca, a
plentiful country having very large towns.’”!

The expedition reached Cocga after leaving Tali and Tasqui, and
after passing through several villages which according to Elvas
were ‘‘subject to the cacique of Coga.”? On Friday, July 16, 1540,
they entered the town. The chief of Coosa came out to meet them
in a litter borne on the shoulders of his principal men, and with
many attendants playing on flutes and singing.’ “In the barbacoas,”’
says Elvas, ‘‘was a great quantity of maize and beans; the country,
thickly settled in numerous and large towns, with fields between,
extending from one to another, was pleasant, and had a rich soil
with fair river margins. In the woods were many ameizas [plums
and persimmons], as well those of Spain as of the country; and wild
grapes on vines growing up into the trees, near the streams; like-
wise a kind that grew on low vines elsewhere, the berry being large
and sweet, but, for want of hoeing and dressing, had large stones.’’4

After a slight difference with the natives, who naturally objected
to having their chief virtually held captive by De Soto, the Spaniards
secured the bearers and women they desired and started on again
toward the south or southwest on Friday, August 20.° It would
appear that the influence of the Coosa chief extended over a large
number of the towns later called Upper Creeks, although this was
probably due rather to ties of alliance and respect than to any
actual overlordship on his part. At a town called Tallise, perhaps
identical with the later Tulsa, this authority seems to have come
to an end, and farther on were the Mobile quite beyond the sphere of
his influence.

In 1559 a gigantic effort was made on the part of the Spaniards to
colonize the region of our Gulf States. An expedition, led by Tristan
de Luna, started from Mexico with that object in view. We have
already mentioned the landing of this colony in Pensacola Harbor, or
Mobile Bay, and their subsequent removal northward to a town called

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 60. 4Tbid., 1, p. 82.
2 Thid., p. 81. 6 Tbid., 1, p. 113.
3 Tbid., p. 81; 0, pp. 16, 112. <-

q
by
¢

—— a ee |

>
2

SATII np ner LO I eI OM FPP?

-
" SY

5 NP

—s. _
ew
¥

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 931

Nanipacna. Being threatened with starvation here, De Luna sent a

sergeant major with six captains and 200 soldiers northward in search
of Coosa, whither some of his companions had accompanied De Soto
20 years before, and which they extolled highly. They came first to a
place called Olibahali, of which we shall speak again, and after a short
stay there continued still farther toward the north. The narrative
continues as follows:

The whole province was called Coza, taking its name from the most famous city
within its boundaries. It was God’s will that they should soon get within sight of
that place which had been so far famed and so much thought about and, yet, it did
not have above thirty houses, or a few more. There were seven little hamlets in
its district, five of them smaller and two larger than Coza itself, which name prevailed
for the fame it had enjoyed inits antiquity. It looked so much worse to the Spaniards
for having been depicted so grandly, and they had thought it to be so much better.
Its inhabitants had been said to be innumerable, the site itself as being wider and
more level than Mexico, the springs had been said to be many and of very clear water,
food plentiful and gold and silver in abundance, which, without judging rashly, was
that which the Spaniards desired most. Truly the land was fertile, but it lacked
cultivation. .There was much forest, but little fruit, because as it was not cultivated
the land was all unimproved and full of thistles and weeds. Those they had brought
along as guides, being people who had been there before, declared that they must
have been bewitched when this country seemed to them so rich and populated as
they had stated. The arrival of the Spaniards in former years had driven the Indians
up into the forests, where they preferred to live among the wild beasts who did no harm
to them, but whom they could master, than among the Spaniards at whose hands they
received injuries, although they were good to them. Those from Coza received the
guests well, liberally, and with kindness, and the Spaniards appreciated this, the more
so as the actions of their predecessors did not call for it. They gave them each day
four fanegas! of corn for theirmen and their horses, of which latter they had fifty and
none of which, even during their worst sufferings from hunger, they had wanted to
kill and eat, well knowing that the Indians were more afraid of horses, and that one
horse gave them a more warlike appearance, than the fists of two men together. But
the soldiers did not look for maize; they asked most diligently where the gold could
be found and where the silver, because only for the hopes of this as a dessert had they
endured the fasts of the painful journey. Every day little groups of them went search-
ing through the country and they found it all deserted and without news of gold.
From only two tribes were there news about gold—one was the Oliuahali which they
had just left; the others were the Napochies, who lived farther on. Those were enemies
to those of Coza, and they had very stubborn warfare with each other, the Napochies
avenging some offense they had received at the hands of the people of Coza. The latter
Indians showed themselves such good friends of the Spaniards that our men did not
know what recompense to give them nor what favor to do them. The wish to favor
those who humiliate themselves goes hand in hand with ambition. The Spaniards
have the fame of not being very humble and the people of Coza who had surrendered.
themselves experienced now their favors. Not only were they careful not to cause
them any damage or injury, but gave them many things they had brought along,
outside of what they gave in the regular exchange for maize. Their gratitude went even
so far that the sergeant major, who accompanied the expedition as captain of the 200
men, told the Indians that if they wanted his favor and the strength of his men to
make war on their enemies, they could have them readily, just as they had been ready

1 About the same number of English bushels.

932 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

to receive him and his men and favor them with food. Those of Coza thought very
highly of this offer, and in the hope of its fulfillment kept the Spaniards such a long
time with them, giving them as much maize each day as was possible, the land being
so poor and the villages few and small. The Spaniards were nearly 300 men between
small and big [young and old] ones, masters and servants, and the time they all ate
there was three months, the Indians making great efforts to sustain such a heavy ex-
pense for the sake of their companionship as well as for the favors they expected
from them later. All the deeds in this life are done for some interested reason and,
just as the Spaniards showed friendship for them that they might not shorten their
provisions and perhaps escape to the forests, so the Indians showed their friendship,
hoping that with their aid they could take full vengeance of their enemies. And the
friars were watching, hoping that a greater population might be discovered to convert
and maintain in the Christian creed. Those small hamlets had until then neither
seen friars nor did they have any commodities to allow monks to live and preach
among them; neither could they embrace and maintain the Christian faith without
their assistance. .. .

Very bitter battles did the Napochies have with those from Coza, but justice was
greatly at variance with success. Those from Coza were in the right, but the Napochies
were victorious. In ancient times the Napochies were tributaries of the Coza people,
because this place (Coza) was always recognized as head of the kingdom and its lord
was considered to stand above the one of the Napochies. Then the people from Coza
began to decrease while the Napochies were increasing until they refused to be their
vassals, finding themselves strong enough to maintain their liberty which they abused.
Then those of Coza took to arms to reduce the rebels to their former servitude, but the
most victories were on the side of the Napochies. Those from Coza remained greatly
affronted as well from seeing their ancient tribute broken off, as because they found
themselves without strength to restore it. On that account they had lately stopped
their fights, although their sentiments remained the same and for several months they
had not gone into the battlefield, for fear lest they return vanquished, as before. When
the Spaniards, grateful for good treatment, offered their assistance against their enemies,
they accepted immediately, in view of their rabid thirst for vengeance. All the love
they showed to the Spaniards was in the interest that they should not forget their
promise. Fifteen days had passed, when, after a consultation among themselves,
the principal men went before the captain and thus spoke:

“Sir, we are ashamed not to be able to serve you better, and as we would wish, but
this is only because we are afflicted with wars and trouble with some Indians who are
our neighbors and are called Napochies. Those have always been our tributaries
acknowledging the nobility of our superiors, but a few years ago they rebelled and
stopped their tribute and they killed our relatives and friends. And when they can
not insult us with their deeds, they do so with words. Now, it seems only reasonable,
that you, who have so much knowledge, should favor and increase ours. Thou,
Sefior, hast given us thy word when thou knowest our wish to help us if we should
need thy assistance against our enemies. This promise we, thy servants, beg of thee
humbly now to fulfill and we promise to gather the greatest army of our men [people],
and with thy good order and efforts helping us, we can assure our victory. And when
once reinstated in our former rights, we can serve thee ever so much better.”’

When the captain had listened to the well concerted reasoning of those of Coza, he
replied to them with a glad countenance, that, aside from the fact that it had always
been his wish to help and assist them, it was a common cause now, and he considered
it convenient or even necessary to communicate with all the men, especially with the
friars, who were the ministers of God, and the spiritual fathers of the army; that he
would treat the matter with eagerness, procuring that their wishes be attended to
and that the following day he would give them the answer, according to the resolutions
taken in the matter.

om
—

SWANTON] RARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 233

He [the captain] called to council the friars, the captains, and all the others, who,
according to custom hada right to be there, and, the case being proposed and explained,
it was agreed that only two captains with their men should go, one of cavalry, the other
of infantry, and the other four bodies of their little army remain in camp with the
rest of the people. Then they likewise divided the monks, Fray Domingo de la
Anunciacion going with the new army and Fray Domingo de Salazar remaining with
the others in Coza. The next day, those who wished so very dearly that it be in their
favor, came for the answer. The captain gave them an account of what had been
decided, ordering them to get ready, because he in person desired to accompany them

_with the two Spanish regiments and would take along, if necessary, the rest of the
Spanish army, which would readily come to their assistance. The people from Coza
were very glad and thanked the captain very much, offering to dispose everything
quickly for the expedition. Within six days they were all ready. The Spaniards did
not want to take more than fifty men, twenty-five horsemen and twenty-five on foot.
The Indians got together almost three hundred archers, very skillful and certain in
the use of that arm, in which, the fact that it is the only one they have has afforded
them remarkable training. Every Indian uses a bow as tall as his body; the string is
not made of hemp but of animal nerve sinew well twisted and tanned. They all usea
quiver full of arrows made of long, thin, and very straight rods, the points of which are
of flint, curiously cut in triangular form, the wings very sharp and mostly dipped in
some very poisonous and deadly substance.! They also use three or four feathers tied
on their arrows to insure straight flying, and they are so skilled in shooting them
that they can hit a flying bird. The force of the flint arrowheads is such that at a
moderate distance they can pierce a coat of mail.

The Indians set forward, and it was beautiful to see them divided up in eight differ-
ent groups, two of which marched together in the four directions of the earth (north,
south, east, and west), which is the style in which the children of Israel used to march,
three tribes together in the four directions of the world to signify that they would
occupy it all. They were well disposed, and in order to fight their enemies, the
Napochies, better, they lifted their bows, arranged the arrows gracefully and shifted
the band of the quiver as if they wanted to beseech it to give up new shafts quickly;

others examined the necklace [collar] to which the arrow points were fastened and

which hung down upon their shoulders, and they all brandished their arms and
stamped with their feet on the ground, all showing how great was their wish to fight
and how badly they felt about the delay. Each group had its captain, whose emblem
was a long stave of two brazas ? in height and which the Indians call Otatl * and which
has at its upper end several white feathers. These were used like banners, which
everyone had to respect and obey. This was also the custom among the heathens
who affixed on such a stave the head of some wild animal they had killed on a hunt,
or the one of some prominent enemy whom they had killed in battle. To carry the
white feathers was a mystery, for they insisted that they did not wish war with the
Napochies, but to reduce them to the former condition of tributaries to them, the
Coza people, and pay ull since the time they had refused obedience. In order togive
the Indian army more power and importance the captain had ordered a horse to be
fixed with all its trappings for the lord or cacique of the Indians, and as the poor
Indian had never seen much less used one, he ordered a negro to guide the animal.
The Indians in those parts had seen horses very rarely, or only at a great distance and
to their sorrow, nor were there any in New Spain before the arrival of the Spaniards.
The cagique went or rather rode in the rear guard, not less flattered by the obsequious-
ness ofthe captain than afraid of his riding feat. Our Spaniards also left Coza, always

! This statement is probably erroneous, as the use 2 One braza is 6 feet.
of poisoned arrows among our southern Indians is 3 Or otatli, a Nahuatl word.
denied by all other writers.

934 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuL. 73

being careful to put up their tents or lodgings apart from the Indians so that the latter
could not commit any treachery if they so intended. One day, after they had all left
Coza at a distance of about eight leagues, eight Indians, who appeared to be chiefs,
entered the camp of the Spaniards, running and without uttering a word; they also
passed the Indian camp and, arriving at the rear guard where their ca¢ique was, took
him down from his horse, and the one who seemed to be the highest in rank among the
eight, put him on his shoulders, and the others caught him, both by his feet and arms,
and they ran with great impetuosity back the same way they had come. These runners
emitted very loud howlings, continuing them as long as their breath lasted, and when
their wind gave out they barked like big dogs until they had recovered it in order to
continue the howls and prolonged shouts. The Spaniards, though tired from the sun
and hungry, observing the ceremonious superstitions cf the Indians, upon seeing and
hearing the mad music with which they honored their lord, could not contain their
laughter in spite of their sufferings. The Indians continued their run to a distance
of about half a league from where the camp was, until they arrived on a little plain near
the road which had been carefully swept and cleaned for the purpose. There had been
constructed in the center of that plain a shed or theatre nine cubits in height with a
few rough steps to mount. Upon arriving near the theatre the Indians first carried their
lord around the plain once on their shoulders, then they lowered him at the foot of the
steps, which he mounted alone. He remained standing while all the Indians were
seated on the plain, waiting to see what their master would do. The Spaniards were
on their guard about these wonderful and quite new ceremonies and desirous to know
their mysteries and understand their object and meaning. The ca¢ique began to
promenade with great majesty on the theatre, looking with severity over the world.
Then they gave him a most beautiful fly flap which they had ready, made of showy
birds’ plumes of great value. As soon as he held it in his hand he pointed it towards
the land of the Napochies in the same fashion as would the astrologer the alidade
[cross-staff], or the pilot the sextant in order to take the altitude at sea. After having
done this three or four times they gave him some little seeds like fern seeds, and he
put them into his mouth and began to grind and pulverize them with his teeth and
molars, pointing again three or four times towards the land of the Napochies as he had
done before. When the seeds were all ground he began to throw them from his mouth
around the plain in very small pieces. Then he turned towards his captains with a
glad countenance and he said to them: ‘‘Console yourselves, my friends; our journey
will have a prosperous outcome; our enemies will be conquered and their strength
broken, like those seeds which I ground between my teeth.’’ After pronouncing
these few words, he descended from the scaffold and mounted his horse, continuing
his way, as he had done hitherto. The Spaniards were discussing what they had seen,
and laughing about this grotesque ceremony, but the blessed father, Fray Domingo
de la Anunciacion, mourned over it, for it seemed sacrilege to him and a pact with
the demon, those ceremonials which those poor people used in their blind idolatry.
They all arrived, already late, at the banks of a river, and they decided to rest there
in order to enjoy the coolness of the water to relieve the heat of the earth. When the
Spaniards wanted to prepare something to eat they did not find anything. There had
been a mistake, greatly to the detriment of all. The Indians had understood that the
Spaniards carried food for being so much more dainty and delicate people, and the
Spaniards thought the Indians had provided it, since they (the Spaniards) had gone
along for their benefit. Both were to blame, and they all suffered the penalty. They
remained without eating a mouthful that night and until the following one, putting
down that privation more on the list of those of the past. They put up the two camps
at a stone’s throw, being thus always on guard by this division, for, although the
Indians were at present very much their friends, they are people who make the laws
of friendship doubtful and they had once been greatly offended with the Spaniards,
and were now their reconciled friends.

5 Phd 4p EPROM HY

a te Get a

ne OF A yg ABG “—"

rermmerlapaay vanadh parte

C4 EAN

“

-~e

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 935

With more precaution than satiety the Spaniards procured repose that night,
when, at the tenth hour, our camp being at rest, a great noise was heard from that
of the Indians, with much singing, and dances after their fashion, in the luxury of
big fires which they had started in abundance, there being much firewood in that
place. Our men were on their guard until briefly told by the interpreter, whom
they had taken along, that there was no occasion for fear on the part of the Spaniards,
but a feasting and occasion of rejoicing on that of the Indians. They felt more
assured yet when they saw that the Indians did not move from their place and
they now watched most attentively to enjoy their ceremonials as they had done in
the past, asking the interpreter what they were saying to one another. After they
had sung and danced for a long while the cacique seated himself on an elevated
place, the six captains drawing near him, and he began to speak to them admonishing
the whole army to be brave, restore the glory of their ancestors, and avenge the
injuries they had received. ‘‘ Not one of you,’’ he said, ‘‘can help considering as
particularly his this enterprise, besides being that of all in common. Remember_
your relatives and you will see that not one among you has been exempt from
mourning those who have been killed at the hands of the Napochies. Renew the
dominion of your ancestors and detest the audacity of the tributaries who have tried
to violate it. If we came alone, we might be obliged to see the loss of life, but not
of our honor; how much more now, that we have in our company the brave and
vigorous Spaniards, sons of the sun and relatives of the gods.’’ The captains had
been listening very attentively and humbly to the reasoning of their lord, and as he
finished they approached him one by one in order, repeating to him in more or fewer
words this sentence: ‘*‘Sefior, the more than sufficient reason for what thou hast told
us is known to us all; many are the damages the Napochies have done us, who
besides having denied us the obedience they have inherited from their ancestors,
have shed the blood of those of our kin and country. For many a day have we wished
for this occasion to show our courage and serye-thee, especially now, that thy great
prudence has won us the favor and endeavor of the brave Spaniards. I swear to
thee, Sefior, before our gods, to serve thee with all my men in this battle and not
turn our backs on these enemies the Napochies, until we have taken revenge.’’
These words the captain accompanied by threats and warlike gestures, desirous
(and as if calling for the occasion) to show by actions the truth of his words. All
this was repeated by the second captain and the others in their order, and this homage
finished, they retired for the rest of the night. The Spaniards were greatly sur-
prised to find such obeisance used to their princes by people of such retired regions,
usages which the Romans and other republics of considerable civilization practiced -
before they entered a war. Besides the oath the Romans made every first of January
before their Emperor, the soldiers made another one to the captain under whose
orders they served, promising never to desert his banner, nor evade the meeting of
the enemy, but toinjure himinevery way. Manysuch examples are repeated since the
time of Herodianus, Cornelius Tacitus, and Suetonius Tranquilus, with a particular
reminiscence in the life of Galba. And it is well worth consideration that the power
of nature should have created a similarity in the ceremonials among Indians and
Romans in cases of war where good reasoning rules so that all be under the orders of
the superiors and personal grievances be set aside for the common welfare. This
oath the captains swore on the hands of their lord on that night because they expected
to see their enemies on the following day very near by, or even be with them, and
the same oath remained to be made by the soldiers to their captains. At daybreak
hunger made them rise early, hoping to reach the first village of the Napochies in
order to get something to eat, for they needed it very much. They traveled all that
day, making their night’s rest near a big river which was at a distance of two leagues
from the first village of the enemy. There it seemed most convenient for the army
to rest, in order to fall upon the village by surprise in the dead of night and kill them

a ‘

236 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 73

all, this being the intention of those from Coza. In order to attain better their
intentions, they begged of the captain not to have the trumpet sounded that evening,
which was the signal to all for prayer, greeting the queen of the Angels with the Ave
Maria, which is the custom in all Christendom at nightfall. ‘‘The Napochies’’ said
the people of Coza, ‘‘are ensnarers and always have their spies around those fields,
and upon hearing the trumpet they would retire into the woods and we would remain
without the victory we desire; and therefore the trumpet should not be sounded.”’
Thus the signal remained unsounded for that one night, but the blessed father Fray
Domingo de la Anunciacion, with his pious devotion, went around to all the sol-
diers telling them to say the Ave Maria, and he who was bugler of the evangile now
had become bugler of war in the service of the Holy Virgin Mary. That night those
of Coza sent their spies into the village of the Napochies to see what they were doing
and if they were careless on account of their ignorance of the coming of the enemy;
or, if knowing it, they were on the warpath. At midnight the spies came back,
well content, for they had noticed great silence and lack of watchfulness in that
village, where, not only was there no sound of arms, but even the ordinary noises
of inhabited places were not heard. ‘‘They all sleep,’’ they said, ‘‘and are entirely
ignorant of our coming, and as a testimonial that we have made our investigation of
the enemies’ village carefully and faithfully, we bring these ears of green corn, these
beans, and calabashes, taken from the gardens which the Napochies have near their
own houses.’’ With those news the Coza people recovered new life and animation,
and on that night all the soldiers made their oath to their captains, just as the cap-
tains had done on the previous one to their cacique. And our Spaniards enjoyed
those ceremonies at closer quarters, since they had seen from the first ceremony
that this was really war against Indians which was intended, and not craft against
themselves. The Indians were now very ferocious, with a great desire to come in
contact with their enemies... .

All of the Napochies had left their town, because without it being clear who
had given them warning, they had received it, and the silence the spies had noticed
in the village was not due to their carelessness but to their absence. The people of
Coza went marching towards the village of the Napochies in good order, spreading
over the country in small companies, each keeping to one road, thus covering all
the exits from the village in order to kill all of their enemies, for they thought they
were quiet and unprepared in their houses. When they entered the village they
were astonished at the too great quiet and, finding the houses abandoned, they saw
upon entering that their enemies had left them in a hurry, for they left even their
food and in several houses they found it cooking on the fire, where now those poor
men found it ready to season. They found in that village, which was quite complete,
a quantity of maize, beans, and many pots filled with bear fat, bears abounding in
that country and their fat being greatly prized. The highest priced riches which
they could carry off as spoils were skins of deer and bear, which those Indians tanned
in a diligent manner very nicely and with which they covered themselves or which
they used as beds. The people of Coza were desirous of finding some Indians on
whom to demonstrate the fury of their wrath and vengeance and they went looking
for them very diligently, but soon they saw what increased their wrath. In a square
situated in the center of the village they found a pole of about three estados in height !
which served as gallows or pillory where they affronted or insulted their enemies
and also criminals. As in the past wars had been in favour of the Napochies, that
pole was full of scalps of people from Coza. It was an Indian custom that the scalp
of the fallen enemy was taken and hung on that pole. The dead had been numerous
and the pole was quite peopled with scalps. It was a very great sorrow for the Coza
people to see that testimonial of their ignominy which at once recalled the memory

1 Three times the height of a man.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS PAG

of past injuries. They all raised their voices in a furious wail, bemoaning the deaths -
of their relatives and friends. They shed many tears as well for the loss of their
dead as for the affront to the living. Moved to compassion, the Spaniards tried to
console them, but for a very long time the demonstrations of mourning did not give
them a chance for a single word, nor could they do more than go around the square
with extraordinary signs of compassion or sorrow for their friends or of wrath against
their enemies Then they [the Indians] got hold of one of the hatchets which the
Spaniards had brought with them, and they cut down the dried out tree close to
the ground, taking the scalps to bury them with the superstitious practices of their
kind. With all this they became so furious and filled with vengeance, that
everyone of them wished to have many hands and to be able to lay them all on the
Napochies. They went from house to house looking for someone like enfuriated
lions and they found only a poor strange Indian [from another tribe] who was ill
and very innocent of those things, but as blind vengeance does not stop to consider,
they tortured the poor Indian till they left him dying. Before he expired though,
the good father Fray Domingo reached his side and told him, through the interpreter
he had brought along, that if he wished to enjoy the eternal blessings of heaven, he
should receive the blessed water of baptism and thereby become a Christian. He
further gave him a few reasonings, the shortest possible as the occasion demanded,
but the unfortunate Indian, with inherent idolatry and suffering from his fresh wounds,
did not pay any attention to such good council, but delivered his soul to the demon
as his ancestors before him had done. This greatly pained the blessed Father Do-
mingo, because, as his greatest aim was to save souls, their loss was his greatest sorrow.

When the vindictive fury of the Coza people could not find any hostile Napochies
on whom to vent itself, they wanted to burn the whole village and they started to
do so. This cruelty caused much grief to the merciful Fray Domingo de la Anun-
ciacion, and upon his plea the captain told the people of Coza to put out the fires,
and the same friar, through his interpreter, condemned their action, telling them that
it was cowardice to take vengeance in the absence of the enemies whose flight, if
it meant avowal of their deficiency, was so much more glory for the victors. All
the courage which the Athenians and the Lacedemonians showed in their wars was
nullified by the cruelty which they showed the vanquished. ‘‘How can we know,”’
said the good father to the Spaniards, ‘‘whether the Indians of this village are not
perhaps hidden in these forests, awaiting us in some narrow pass to strike us all down
with their arrows? Don’t allow, brethren, this cruel destruction by fire, so that God
may not permit your own deaths at the hands of the inhabitants of this place [these
houses].’’ The captain urged the cacique to have the fire stopped; and as he was
tardy in ordering it, the captain told him in the name of Fray Domingo, that if the
village was really to be burnt down, the Spaniards would all return because
they considered this war of the fire as waged directly against them by burning down
the houses, where was the food which they all needed so greatly at all times. Fol-
lowing this menace, the cacique ordered the Indians to put out the fire which had
already made great headway and to subdue which required the efforts of the whole
army. When the Indians were all quieted, the cacique took possession of the village
in company with his principal men and with much singing and dancing, accompanied
by the music of badly tuned flutes, they celebrated their victories.

The abundance of maize in that village was greater than had been supposed and
the cacique ordered much of it to be taken to Coza! so that the Spaniards who had
remained there should not lack food. His main intention was to reach or find the
enemy, leaving enough people in that village [of the Napochies] to prove his possession
and a garrison of Spanish soldiers, which the captain asked for greater security. He
then left to pursue the fugitives. They left in great confusion, because they did not

1 Acoca in the original MS.

238 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL, 73

know where to find a trace of the flight which a whole village had taken and although
the people of Coza endeavored diligently to find out whether they had hidden in
the forests, they could not obtain any news more certain than their own conjectures.
‘‘Tt can not be otherwise,’’ they said, ‘‘than that the enemy, knowing that we were
coming with the Spaniards became suspicious of the security of their forests and
went to hide on the great water.’”” When the Spaniards heard the name of great water,
they thought it might be the sea, but it was only a great river, which we call the
River of the Holy Spirit, the source of which is in some big forests of the country
called La Florida. It is very deep and of the width of two harquebuse-shots. In a
certain place which the Indians knew, it became very wide, losing its depth, so that
it could be forded and it is there where the Napochies of the first village had passed,
and also those who lived on the bank of that river, who, upon hearing the news, also
abandoned their village, passing the waters of the Oquechiton, which is the name
the Indians give that river and which means in our language the great water (la grande
agua). Before the Spaniards arrived at this little hamlet however, they saw on the
flat. roof (azotea) of an Indian house, two Indians who were on the lookout to see
whether the Spaniards were pursuing the people of the two villages who had fled
across the river. The horsemen spurred their horses and, when the Indians on guard
saw them, they were so surprised by their monstrosity [on horseback] that they
threw themselves down the embankment towards the river, without the Spaniards
being able to reach them, because the bank was very steep and the Indians very
swift. One of them was in such a great hurry that he left a great number of arrows
behind which he had tied up in a skin, in the fashion of a quiver.

All the Spaniards arrived at the village but found it deserted, containing a great
amount of food, such as maize and beans. The inhabitants of both villages were on
the riverbank on the other side, quite confident that the Spaniards would not be able
to ford it. They ridiculed and made angry vociferations against the people from Coza.
Their mirth was short lived, however, for, as the Coza people knew that country, they
found the ford in the river and they started crossing it, the water reaching the chests
of those on foot and the saddles of the riders. Fray Domingo de la Anunciacion
remained on this side of the water with the cacique, because as he was not of the war
party it did not seem well that he should get wet. When our soldiers had reached
about the middle of the river, one of them fired his flint lock which he had charged
with two balls, and he felled one of the Napochies who was on the other side. When
the others saw him on the ground dead, they were greatly astonished at the kind of
Spanish weapon, which at such a distance could at one shot killmen. They put him
on their shoulders and hurriedly carried him off, afraid that other shots might follow
against their own persons. All the Napochies fled, and the people of Coza upon
passing the river pursued them until the fugitives gathered on the other side of an arm
of the same stream, and when those from Coza were about to pass that the Napochies
called out to them and said that they would fight no longer, but that they would be
friends, because they [the Coza people] brought with them the power of the Spaniards;
that they were ready to return to their former tributes and acknowledgment of what
they owed them [the Coza people]. Those from Coza were glad and they called to
them that they should come in peace and present themselves to their cacique. They all
came to present their obedience, the captain of the Spaniards requesting that the van-
quished be treated benignly. The cacique received them with severity, reproach-
ing them harshly for their past rebellion and justifying any death he might choose to
give them, as well for their refusal to pay their tributes as for the lives of so many Coza
people which they had taken, but that the intervention of the Spaniards was so highly
appreciated that he admitted them into his reconciliation and grace, restoring former

) This is pure Choctaw, from oka, water, and the objective form of chito, big. This river was not the
Mississippi, as Padilla supposes, but probably the Black Warrior.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 939

conditions. The vanquished were very grateful, throwing the blame on bad coun-
selors, as if it were not just as bad to listen to the bad which is advised as to advise it.
They capitulated and peace was made.

The Napochies pledged themselves to pay as tributes, thrice a year, game, or fruits,
chestnuts, and nuts, in confirmation of their [the Coza people’s] superiority, which
had been recognized by their forefathers. This done, the whole army returned to
the first village of the Napochies, where they had left in garrison Spanish soldiers and
Coza people. As this village was convenient they rested there three days, until it
seemed time to return to Coza where the 150 Spanish soldiers were waiting for them.
The journey was short and they arrived soon, and although they found them all in
good health, including Father Fray Domingo de Salazar who had remained with them,
all had suffered great hunger and want, because there were many people and they
had been there a longtime. They began to talk of returning to Nanipacna, where they
had left their general, not having found in this land what had been claimed and hoped
for. As it means valor in war sometimes to flee and temerity to attack, thus is it pru-
dence on some occasions to retrace one’s steps, when the going ahead does not bring
any benefit.!

Barcia’s account of this expedition is much shorter and contains
little not given in the narrative of Padilla. He says that Father
Domingo de la Anunciacion ‘‘asked the Indians about a man called
Falco Herrado,? a soldier of low rank, who remained voluntarily at
Coza when Hernando de Soto passed through there; and he also asked
about a negro, by the name of Robles, whom De Soto left behind sick,*
and he was informed that they had lived for 11 or 12 years among
those Indians, who treated them very well, and that 8 or 9 years before
they died from sickness.”’

After consultation the Spaniards determined to send messengers
back to De Luna, the bulk of the force remaining where it was until
they learned whether he would join them. They found that the
Spanish settlers had withdrawn to the port where they had originally
landed, and, arrived there, they received orders to return to the Span-
iards in Coza and direct them to abandon the country and unite with
the rest of the colony. As soon as the messengers reached them they
set out ‘‘to the great grief of the Indians who accompanied them two
or three days’ journey weeping, with great demonstrations of love,
but not for their religion, since only one dying Indian asked for
baptism, which Father Salazar administered to him. In the begin-
ning of November they reached the port after having been seven
months on this exploration.” ®

We learn from this narrative that the nucleus of the Coosa River
Creeks and the Tallapoosa River Creeks was already in existence, and
that the Coosa and Holiwahali tribes were then most prominent

1 Davila Padilla, Historia, pp. 205-217. Translation by Mrs. F. Bandelier.

2 Ranjel in Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 0, p.113; he gives this man’s name as Feryada, and calls him a
Levantine. :

8 Ibid., p. 114.

4 Barcia, La Florida, p. 35.

5 Tbid., pp. 37-39.

240 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

in the respective groups. It is probable that most of the other tribes
afterwards found upon Tallapoosa River were at this time in Georgia,
and it is likely that the Abihka had not yet come to settle beside the
Coosa. In spite of an evident confusion in the minds of the
Spaniards of Indian and feudal institutions there must have been
some basis for the overlordship said to have been enjoyed by the
Indians of Coosa. The Napochies seem to have been a Choctaw-
speaking people on the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers. Mr.
Grayson informs me that the name was preserved until recent years
as a war title among the Creeks. They were probably identical with
the Napissa, whom Iberville notes as having already in his time
(1699) united with the Chickasaw.!

In 1567 Juan Pardo came toward this country, advancing beyond
Chiaha on the Tennessee to a place called Satapo, from which some
Indians and a soldier proceeded to Coosa. On the authority of the
soldier, Vandera gives the following description of Coosa town:

Coosa is a large village, the largest to be met after leaving Santa Elena on the road
we took from there. It may contain about 150 people—that is, judging by the size of
the village. It seems to be a wealthier place than all the others; there are generally
agreat many Indiansinit. It is situated in a valley at the foot of a mountain. All
around it at one-quarter, one-half, and one league there are very many big places. It
is a very fertile country; its situation is at midday’s sun or perhaps a little less than
midday.(?)?

Fear of this tribe, allied with the ‘‘Chisca, Carrosa, and Costehe,”’
was what decided Pardo to turn back to Santa Elena.* While Van-
dera seems to say that Coosa had 150 inhabitants, he must mean
neighborhoods, otherwise it certainly would not be the largest place
the Spaniards had discovered. Garcilasso says that in Coosa there
were 500 houses, but he is wont to exaggerate.t At the same time,
if Vandera means 150 neighborhoods and Garcilasso counted all
classes of buildings, the two statements could be reconciled very well.

And now, after enjoying such early prominence, the Coosa tribe
slips entirely from view, and when we next catch a glimpse of it its
ancient importance has gone. Adair, the first writer to notice the
town particularly, says:

In the upper or most western part of the country of the Muskohge there was an old
beloved town, now reduced to a small ruinous village, called Koosah, which is still a
place of safety to those who kill undesignedly. It stands on commanding ground,
overlooking a bold river.®

The name appears in the enumerations of 1738,° 1750,° and 1760,’
and a part at least in the enumeration of 1761.8 In 1796 John O'Kelly,
a half-breed, was trader there, having succeeded his father.®

1 Margery, Déc., Iv, p. 180. 6 MS., Ayer Coll,

2 Vandera in Ruidiaz, 0, pp. 485-486. 7 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, pp. 94-95.

3 Tbid., p. 471. 8 Col. Docs. Ga,, VI, p. 512.

4 Garcilasso in Shipp, De Soto and Florida, p. 374. ® Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., Ix, pp. 34, 169.

6 Adair, Hist. Am, Inds., p. 159.

|
|
|
|
,
|
,
.

ee se er ee

baz.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 241

Hawkins describes the town as follows, as it existed in 1799:

Coo-sau; on the left bank of Coo-sau, between two creeks, Eu-fau-lau and Nau-chee.
The town borders on the first, above; and on the other river. The town is on a high

and beautiful hill; the land on the river is rich and flat for two hundred yards, then

waving and rich, fine for wheat and corn. It isa limestone country, with fine springs,
and a very desirable one; there is reed on the branches, and pea-vine in the rich bot-
toms and hill sides, moss in the river and on the rock beds of the creek.

They get fish plentifully in the spring season, near the mouth of Eu-fau-lau-hat-che;
they are rock, trout, buffalo, red horse and perch. They have fine stocks of horses,
hogs and cattle; the town gives name to the river, and is sixty miles above
Tus-kee-gee.!

Coosa had evidently fallen off very much from its ancient grandeur
and its name does not appear in the census enumeration of 1832.
Those who lived there abandoned their town some years after 1799,
and settled a few miles higher up on the east side of the river near
what is now East Bend.? It is not now represented by any existing
town among the Creeks, but the name is well known and still appears
in war titles. From the census list of 1761 one might judge that part
of the Coosa had moved down on Tallapoosa River and settled with
the Fus-hatchee people, with whom they would have gone to Florida
and afterwards, in part at least, to the southern part of the Seminole
Nation, Oklahoma.? The French census of about 1760 associates
them rather with the Kan-hatki, but the fate of Kan-hatki and Fus-
hatchee was the same.‘ What happened to the greater portion of
them will be told presently.

Besides Coosa proper we find a town placed on several maps be-
tween Tuskegee and Koasati and called ‘Old Coosa,”’ or ‘‘Coussas
old village.’”’ From the resemblance of the name to that of the
Koasati as usually spelled, and the proximity of the two places,
Gatschet thought it was another term applied to the latter.* But on
the other hand we often find Coosa-old-town and Koasati on the same
map, and both are mentioned separately in the enumerations of 1760
and1761.6 The fact that, according to the same lists, there were Coosa
on Tallapoosa River not far away, associated with the Fus-hatchee
and Kan-hatki, would strengthen the belief that there were really some
Coosa Indians at this place. Even if there were not, the name itself
clearly implies that the site had once been occupied by Coosa Indians,
and by inference at a time anterior to the settlement of the Coosa
already considered. Without traceable connection with any of these
bodies is ‘‘a Small Settlement of Indians called the Cousah old Fields”’

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 11, p. 41.

2 Plate 8; Roycein 18th Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pt. 2, pl. cviil, map of Alabama.
3 Ga. Col. Does., vm, p. 523.

4 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 94.

§ Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 137.

6 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 94; Ga. Col. Docs., vi, p. 524.

148061 °—22 16

242 BUREAU OF AMERICAN. ETHNOLOGY [BULL. T3

encountered in 1778 between the Choctawhatchee and Apalachicola
Rivers by a British expedition under David Holmes sent into East
Florida from Pensacola.'

Still another branch of this tribe was in all probability the Coosa
of South Carolina which has been elsewhere considered.?

By common tradition and the busk expression, “ We are Kos-istagi,”’
still used by them, we know that there are several other towns
descended from Coosa, though no longer bearing the name. The
most important of these was Otciapofa, commonly called “ Hickory
Ground,’’ whose people came from Little Tulsa. Little Tulsa was
the seat of the famous Alexander McGillivray and was located on the
east bank of Coosa River 3 miles above the falls. After his death the
inhabitants all moved to the Hickory Ground, Otciapofa, which was on
the same side of the river just below the falls. The condition of this
latter town in 1799 is thus ‘described by Hawkins:

O-che-au-po-fau; from Oche-ub, a hickory tree, and po-fau, in or among, called by
the traders, hickory ground. It is on the left bank of the Coosau, two miles above the
fork of the river, and one mile below the falls, on a flat of poor land, just below a small
stream; the fields are on the right side of the river, on rich flat land; and this flat
extends back for two miles, with oak and hickory, then pine forest; the range out in
this forest is fine for cattle; reed is abundant in all the branches.

The falls can be easily passed in canoes, either up or down; the rock is very different
from that of Tallapoosa; here it is ragged and very coarse granite; the land bordering
on the left side of the falls is broken or waving, gravelly, not rich. At the termina-
tion of the falls there is a fine little stream, large enough for a small mill, called, from
the clearness of the water, We-hemt-le, good water.’ Three and a half miles above the
town are ten apple trees, planted by the late General McGillivray; half a mile further
up are the remains of Old Tal-e-see,® formerly the residence of Mr. Lochlan® and his
son, the general. Here are ten apple trees, planted by the father, and a stone chimney,
the remains of a house built by the son, and these are all the improvements left by
the father and son.

These people are, some of them, industrious. They have forty gunmen, nearly
three hundred cattle, and some horses and hogs; the family of the general belong to
this town; he left one son and two daughters; the son is in Scotland, with his grand-
father, and the daughters with Sam Macnack [Moniac], a hali-breed, their uncle; the
property is much of it wasted. The chiefs have requested the agent for Indian affairs
to take charge of the property for the son, to prevent its being wasted by the sisters
of the general or by theirchildren. Mrs. Durant, the oldest sister, has eight children.
She is industrious, but has no economy ormanagement. In possession of fourteen
working negroes, she seldom makes bread enough, and they live poorly. She can
spin and weave, and is making some feeble efforts to obtain clothing for her family.
The other sister, Sehoi, has about thirty negroes, is extravagant and heedless, neither
spins nor weaves, and has no government of her family. She has one son, David Tale
[Tate?] who has been educated in Philadelphia and Scotland. He promises to do
better.’

1Copy of MS.,,. Lib. Cong. 5 Little Tulsa.

2 See p. 25. 6 The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘‘Mr. Lochlan MecGilli-
3 Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 44. vray.’’
4 Wi hiti=‘‘good water.”’ iGa. Hist. Soe. Colls., m1, pp. 39-40.

B
e
2
=
:
¥
ty
*
¢
t

«>

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 243

The town is given in the lists of 1760 and 1761, by Bartram, by
Swan, and in the census of 1832,' and, probably in a distorted form,
in 1750.’

Big Tulsa, which separated from the town last mentioned, may
be identical with that which appears in the De Soto chronicles
under the synonymous terms Talisi, Tallise, and Talisse. Biedma
does not mention it. The other three chroniclers describe it as a
large town by a great river, having plenty of corn. Elvas states
that ‘“‘other towns and many fields of maize were on the opposite
shore.’’* Garcilasso says that this place was “the key of the
country,’ and that it was “palisaded, invested with very good
terraces, and almost surrounded by a river.’”’ He adds that ‘‘it
did not heartily acknowledge the cacique [of Coosa], because of
a neighboring chief, who endeavored to make the people revolt
against him.’’® We may gather from this that Tulsa had at that
time become such a large and strong town that it no longer leaned
on the mother town of Coosa, as would be the case with a new or
weak offshoot. There may indeed be some question whether this
was the Tulsa of later history, but there does not appear to be a
really valid reason to deny this, although the name from which it is
thought to have been derived is a very common one. Spanish docu-
ments of 1597-98 speak, for instance, of a town called Talaxe (or
Talashe) in Guale and a river so called, evidently the Altamaha.
Woodward says that ‘‘the Tallasses never settled on the Tallapoosa
River before 1756; they were moved to that place by James McQueen”’
from the Talladega country,® but the name occurs here on the earliest
maps available, at a date far back of any period of which Woodward
could have had information. Probably his statement applies to an
independent body of Tulsa entered in the list dating from 1750,?
as in the Abihka country, and appearing on the Purcell map (pl. 7)
as ‘‘Tallassehase,” Tulsa old town. The history of this settlement
is otherwise unknown. In De Soto’s time the several towns may not
have become separated, but of that we have no knowledge. My
opinion is that in either case the town entered by De Soto was farther
toward the southwest than the position in which Big Tulsa was later
found, somewhere, in fact, between the site of Holiwahali and that
of the present St. Clair, in Lowndes County, Alabama.’

The name of this town occurs frequently in later documents, and
it is given in the lists of 1750, 1760, and 1761, by Bartram, Swan, and

1 Miss. Prov. Arch.,1, p. 95; Ga. Col. Does., vm, p. 523; Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schoolcraft, Ind.
Tribes, V, p. 262; Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., rv, pp. 280-281.

2MS., Ayer Coll.

3 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, p. 86; m1, pp. 115-116; Garcilasso in Shipp, De Soto and Florida, p. 375.

4 Bourne, op. cit., 1, p. 86.

§ Garcilasso in Shipp, De Soto and Florida, p. 375.

6 Woodward, Reminiscences, p. 77. y

7In plate 2 the positions of Tulsa (1) and Tawasa (1) should be transposed.

244 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 73° 4

Hawkins, and in the census of 1832.1. In the great squares of this k
town and Tukabahchee Tecumseh met the Creeks in council. In |
1797 the traders here were James McQueen, the oldest white man

in the Creek Nation, who had come to Georgia as a soldier under |
Oglethorpe in 1733,? and William Powell. Hawkins gives the follow- .
ing description of it as it existed in 1799:

Tal-e-see, from Tal-o-fau, a town, and e-see, taken.* Situated in the fork of Eu-fau-be
on the left bank of Tal-la-poo-sa, opposite Took-au-bat-che. Eu-fau-be has its source
in the ridge dividing the waters of Chat-to-ho-che from Tal-la-poo-sa, and runs nearly
west to the junction with the river; here it is sixty feet wide. The land on it is
poor for some miles up, then rich flats, bordered with pine land with reedy branches;
a fine range for cattle and horses.

The Indians have mostly left the town, and settled up the creek, or on its waters, for
twenty miles.t| The settlements are some of them well chosen, and fenced with worm
fences. The land bordering on the streams of the right side of the creek, is better than
that of the left; and here the settlements are mostly made. Twelve miles up the creek
from its mouth it forks; the large fork of the left side has some rich flat swamp, large
white oak, poplar, ash, and white pine. The trading path from Cus-se-tuh to the
Upper Creeks crosses this fork twice. Here it is called big swamp (opil-thluc-co).
The waving land to its source is stiff. The growth is post oak, pine, and hard-shelled
hickory.®

The Indians who have settled out on the margins and branches of the creek have,
several of them, cattle, hogs, and horses, and begin to be attentive to them. The head
warrior of the town, Peter McQueen, a half-breed, is a snug trader, has a valuable prop-
erty in negroes and stock, and begins to know their value.

These Indians were very friendly to the United States during the Revolutionary
War, and their old chief, Ho-bo-ith-le Mic-co, of the halfway house (improperly called
the Tal-e-see king), could not be prevailed on by any offers from the agents of Great
Britain to take part with them. On the return of peace, and the establishment of
friendly arrangements between the Indians and citizens of the United States, this
chief felt himself neglected by Mr. Seagrove, which resenting, he robbed and insulted
that gentleman, compelled him to leave his house near Took-au-bat-che, and fly into a
swamp. He has since then, as from a spirit of contradiction, formed a party in oppo-
sition to the will of the nation, which has given much trouble and difficulty to the
chiefs of the land. His principal assistants were the leaders of the banditti who
insulted the commissioners of Spain and the United States, on the 17th September,
1799, at the confluence of Flint and Chat-to-ho-che. The exemplary punishment
inflicted on them by the warriors of the nation, has effectually checked their mis-
chief-making and silenced them. And this chief has had a solemn warning from the
national council, to respect the laws of the nation, or he should meet the punishment
ordained by the law. He is one of the great medal chiefs.

This spirit of party or opposition prevails not only here, but more or less in every
town in the nation. The plainest proposition for ameliorating their condition, is
immediately opposed; and this opposition continues as long as there is hope to obtain
presents, the infallible mode heretofore in use, to gain a point.®

1 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 95; Ga. Col. Does., vm, p. 523; Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schoolcraft, Ind.
Tribes, V, p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 25; Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 260-264.

2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 168.

3 There is a Creek tradition to the effect that this town was once ‘‘captured”’ by the Tukabahchee, but
T am inclined to think that it was invented to account for the name. It is more likely that Gatschet is
right in deriving the name from ¢dlwa, town, and, ahasi, old, although it is now so much abbreviated that
its original meaning is totally obscured. ;

4The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘25 miles.”

5 The Lib. Cong. MS. adds the name of the magnolia.

6 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, pp. 26-27.

“ swanToN] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 945

Tulsa had several branch towns. Mention has already been made
of one of these.'| On the French list of 1760 and several early maps
is a place called Nafape, or Nafabe, which was evidently a Tulsa out-
village on a creek of the same name flowing into Ufaupee Creek.?
Near, and possibly identical with this, was Chatukchufaula, although
on some maps it appears on Tallapoosa River itself. It is evidently
the ‘‘Challacpauley”’ of Swan,’ and I give it as a branch of Tulsa on
the authority of Woodward.‘ It was destroyed in the war of 1813-14
by Indians friendly to the United States Government and the people
probably migrated to Florida.®

_ The “Halfway House,” of which the ‘‘Ho-bo-ith-le Mic-co”’ of
Hawkins was chief, is frequently mentioned by travelers. Taitt gives
its Creek name as ‘‘Chavucleyhatchie.’’ He says:

I took the bearings and distance of the path to this place which is twenty-five miles
ENE. from the Tuckabatchie, situated on a creek called Chavucleyhatchie being the
north branch of Nufabee Creek, which emptys itself into the Tallapuse River at the
great Tallassies. In this village which belongs to the Tallasies are about 20 gunmen
and one trader.®

In Bartram’s list (1777) it appears as ‘‘Ghuaclahatche.’’? Although
given as a town distinct from the Halfway house the ‘“‘Chawelatchie”’
of the Purcell map (pl. 7) is evidently intended for this, especially
since Hawkins calls it ‘“‘Chowolle Hatche.”* The name is perpetu-
ated in the “‘Chewockeleehatchee Creek”? of modern maps.

Another branch was Saoga-hatchee, “Rattle Creek,’’ which appears
as early as 1760.2, Hawkins has the following to say regarding it:

Sou-go-hat-che; from sou-go, a cymbal, and hat-che, a creek. This joins on the left
side of Tallapoosa, ten miles below Eu-fau-lau. It is a large creek, and the land on
the forks and to their sources is stiff in places, and stony. The timber is red oak and
small hickory; the flats on the streams are rich, covered with reed; among the branches
the land is waving and fit for cultivation.

They have thirty gunmen in this village, who have lately joined Tal-e-see. One
of the chiefs, O-fau-mul-gau, has some cattle, others have a few, as they have only
paid attention to their stock within two years, and their means for acquiring them were
slender.

Above this creek, on the waters of Eu-fau-lau-hat-che, there are some settlements
well chosen. The upland is stiff and stony or gravelly; the timber is post and red oak,
pine and hickory; the trees are small; the soil apparently rich enough, and well suited
for wheat, and the streams have some rich flats.®

Another branch, Luteapoga, ‘“‘terrapin resort,” ‘‘place where
, (ize) )

Sas ; :
__ terrapins are gathered,” appears only in-Hawkins’s Letters’? and in
. ee
> 1 See p. 243. 7 Bartram, Travels, p. 461.

i 2 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 95. 8 Ga, Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 50.

, *Schooleraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262. §T bid., mr, p. 49.

1% ‘Woodward, Reminiscences, p. 35. 10 As “ Luchaossoguh.”—Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls.,
Ps 5 See pp. 409-410. IX, p. 33.

6 Mereness, Trav. Am. Col., p. 545.

we,
ee
. 34
| L
>

246 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the census of 1832.1. There is to-day a place called Loachapoka in
Lee County, Alabama, about halfway between Montgomery and West
Point. The name was also given to a western tributary of the Chatta-
hoochee.! After the Creek removal this town settled in the northern-
most part of the nation, where the flourishing modern city of Tulsa has
grown up, named for its mother town. The main town of Tulsa also
split into two parts in Oklahoma, called after their respective loca-
tions Tulsa Canadian and Tulsa Little River. The last is the only
one which in 1912 maintained a square ground.

The Okfuskee [Akfaski] towns constituted the largest group
descended from Coosa. Like the Tulsa, these people referred to them-
selves in busk speeches as Kos-istagi, ‘Coosa people.’’ Thename, which
signifies ‘‘point between rivers,’ nowhere appears in the De Soto
narratives, but is in evidence very early in the maps and documents
of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. On the Lam-
hatty map it is given in the form “Oufusky,”’ apparently as far
east as the east bank of Flint River.2 Not much reliance can be
placed on the geography of this map, though it is not unlikely that
Lamhatty was attempting to place the eastern Okfuskee settlements
on the upper Chattahoochee River. On the De Crenay map of
1733 two Okfuskee towns appear—one, ‘‘Oefasquets,”’ between the
Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers well down toward the point where they
come together; the other, ‘‘Les grands Oefasqué,”’ a considerable dis-
tance up the Tallapoosa.* They occur again in the Spanish census
of 1738, in which the latter is called ‘‘Oefasque Talajase,” showing
it to have been the original town.t The same pair are repeated
in the census of 1750.5 The former appears in the list of 1760 as
“Akfeechkoutchis” (i. e., Little Okfuskee); the latter as ‘‘Akfaches”
(i. e., the Okfuskee proper).® This last is ‘‘the great Okwhuske town”’
which Adair mentions and locates on the west bank of Tallapoosa
River. He calls the Tallapoosa River after it.’

In 1754 the French of Fort Toulouse almost persuaded the Okfuskee
Creeks to cut off those English traders who were among them, but
they were prevented by the opposition of a young chief.6 In 1760
such a massacre did take place at Okfuskee and its branch town,
Sukaispoga, as also at Okchai and Kealedji.® The name of Okfuskee
appears in the list of 1761, and in the lists of Bartram, Swan, and
Hawkins.’ Bartram mentions an upper and a lower town of

1 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong. 1st sess.,1V, pp. 270-274.

2 Plate 9.

3 Amer. Anthrop., n. Ss. vol. X, p.)/

4 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.

6 MS., Ayer Lib.

6 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 95.

7 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., pp. 258, 252

8 Ga. Col. Docs., vu, pp. 41-42.

9 Tbid., pp. 261-266.

10 Ga. Col. Docs., VIM, p. 523; Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soc.
Colls., m1, p. 25.

yea

4 Soe

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 947

the name, perhaps the two distinguished by the French.!. In 1797
the trader was Patrick Donnally.2 In the census rolls of 1832 no
such town appears, but by that time the main settlement seems to
have adopted the name Tcatoksofka, ‘“‘deep rock,” i. e., one where
there was a considerable fall of water, or ‘rock deep down,” and this
does occur. After the removal to Oklahoma, Tcatoksofka was still the
principal town. The old name Okfuskee was revived somewhat later
by a chief named Fushatcutci (Little Fus-hatchee) who moved into
the western part of the nation with part of the Tcatoksofka people
and gave the old name to his new settlement. From this circum-
stance his people afterwards called him Tal-mutca’s mi’ko, ‘‘New
town chief.”

Another branch is called Abihkutci [Abi‘kutci]. The name signi-
fies ‘‘ Little Abihka’’ and it might naturally be supposed that the
people so designating themselves belonged to the Abihka Creeks.
In fact, the principal Abihka town before the emigration was known
as Abihkutci, whereas, after their removal, the diminutive ending
was dropped and the name Abihka resumed. Two stories were
given me of the way in which this name “ Abihkutci’’ came to be
used for an Okfuskee town. According to one, the town was founded
by a few Abihka Indians, but it was later filled up with Okfuskee.
According to the other,some Abihka joined the Okfuskee before the
Civil War and afterwards left them. Then they formed a town
apart and said ‘‘ We will be called Little Abihkas.’’ But since they
had at one time lived with the Okfuskee the latter adopted the name
Abihkutci for use among themselves. In any case the occurrence
does not seem to have preceded the westward emigration of the Creeks,
and the town did not have a very long separate existence. At
the present day it has no square ground of its own.

Another branch was known as Tukabahchee Tallahassee, probably
because it occupied a place where the Tukabahchee had formerly
lived. It appears in the lists of Swan and Hawkins,‘ and the latter
states that in 1797 it received the name of Talmutecasi (New Town).
We find it under this latter designation in the census list of 1832.°
It follows from its recent origin that it is distinct from the Talima-
chusy® or Tallimuchase’ of De Soto’s time, though the names
mean the same thing. After removal these people settled in the south-
western part of the nation and appear to have changed from the
White to the Red side, being sometimes treated as a branch of Atasi.
Their square ground was given up so long ago that very little is
remembered regarding it.

1 Bartram, Travels, p. 461.°

2 Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 169.

8 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess. ,1V, pp. 331-343.

‘Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., m, p. 46.
5 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong. Ist sess., Iv, pp. 254-255.

6 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, u, p. 113.

7 Tbid., 1, p. 84.

948 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY {Buut. 73

One of the oldest branches of Okfuskee was Sukaispoga, “ place
for getting hogs,’”’ called by Hawkins ‘‘Sooc-he-ah,’’ and known to
the traders as ‘‘Hog Range.’ It appears in the censuses of 1760
and 1761, and in the lists of Bartram, Swan, and Hawkins.’ In 1772
it had about 45 gunmen.? From Hawkins’s description, given
below, it appears that the town united with Imukfa about 1799, and
therefore the name does not appear in the census rolls of 1832.
Imukfa was, according to Hawkins, made up of settlers from ‘Thu-
le-oc-who-cat-lau”’ and the people of the town just referred to.
‘“'Thu-le-oc-who-cat-lau”’ is evidently the ‘‘Chuleocwhooatlee”’ which
he mentions in 1797 in his letter and which was ‘‘on the left bank
of Tallapoosa, 11 miles below Newyaucau.*? Tohtogagi [To‘togagi] is
noted by Swan‘ and described (see below) by Hawkins. It preserved
a separate existence after its removal west of the Mississippi down
to the Civil War and was located east of the Canadian. Sometimes
it was known as Hitcisihogi, after the name of its ball ground, though
in the census of 1832 Hitcisihogi appears as an independent town.
Perhaps two originally independent towns were later united.

While giving Atcina-ulga as an Okfuskee town, Hawkins says it
was settled from Lutcapoga.’ These two statements can not be
reconciled, unless we suppose that some Okfuskee Indians were
settled at Lutcapoga. Another branch village given by Hawkins is
Epesaugee (Ipisagi).°

At a very early day several Okfuskee settlements were made on the
upper course of the Chattahoochee. One was called Tukpafka,
“punk,” a name applied in later times to an entirely distinct town,
originating from Wakokai. The name of this particular settlement
occurs in Bartram’s list and is referred to by Hawkins, as will be
seen below.’ In 1777 (see below) they moved over to the Talla-
poosa, where their new settlement was called Nuyaka, an attempt
at modifying the name of New York City to accord with the re-
quirements of Creek harmonic feeling. According to Swan the name
Nuyaka was bestowed by a Colonel Ray, a New York British loyal-
ist,* while Gatschet says it was so named after the treaty of New
York, concluded between the United States Government and the
Creek Indians August 7, 1790.8 It appears in the lists of Swan and
Hawkins, but not on the census rolls of 1832.° After the removal
this town continued to preserve its identity and in 1912 it was the
only Okfuskee division that still maintained a square ground.

1 Miss. Prov. Arch. 1, 95; Ga. Col. Docs., vim, p. 523; Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v,
p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., 0, p. 48.

2 Mereness, Trav. Am. Col., p. 529.

3 Ga. Hist Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 169.

4 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

5 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., mt, p. 45.

6 [bid., p. 47.

7 Bartram, Travels, p. 462; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 45.

8 Misc. Coll. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 404.

9 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1, p. 45.

co)

|
|

wn eet

‘

’

Ret ote tre

“

feet

, ao

SWANTON } BARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIAWS 949

There were three Okfuskee settlements on the Chattahoochee River
which existed for a longer time. These were Tcula’ko-nini (Horse
Trail), Hoti-taiga (War Ford), and Tea’hki tako (Big Shoal). They

—appear in the lists of Bartram and Hawkins, and, with the possible

exception of the last, in that of Swan.'’ The census of 1832 includes a
town of the same name as the last, but omits the others. September
27, 1793, they were attacked by Georgians and so severely handled
that the inhabitants abandoned them and located on the east side of
Tallapoosa River, opposite the mother town, Big Okfuskee.? ‘‘ Wicha-
goes’’ and “‘Illahatchee,”’ given in the traders’ census of 1761, were
probably Okfuskee towns.* Kohamutkikatska, ‘‘place where blow-
gun canes are broken off,’’ was a comparatively late branch of Ok-
fuskee. The name, in an excessively corrupted form (‘‘Nohunt, the
Gartsnar town’’), appears in the census list of 1832.4 | Hawkins has
the following information regarding Okfuskee and its branches:

Oc-fus-kee; from Oc, in, and fuskee, a point. The name is expressive of the position
of the old town, and where the town house now stands on the right bank of Tal-lapoo-sa.
The town spreads out on both sides of the river and is about thirty-five miles above
Took-au-bat-che. The settlers on’ the left side of the river are from Chat-to-ho-che.
They once formed three well-settled villages on that river—Che-luc-co ne-ne, Ho-ith-
le-ti-gau, and Chau-ke thluc-co.

Oc-fus-kee, with its villages, is the largest town in the nation. They estimate the
number of gun men of the old town at one hundred and eighty and two hundred
and seventy in the villages or small towns. The land is flat for half a mile on the
river, and fit for culture; back of this there are sharp, stoney hills; the growth is
pine, and the branches all have reed.

They have no fences around the town; they have some cattle, hogs, and horses,
and their range is a good one; the shoals in the river afford a great supply of moss,
called by the traders salt grass, and the cows which frequent these shoals, are the
largest and finest in the nation; they have some peach trees in the town, and the
cassine yupon,in clumps. The Indians have lately moved out and settled in villages
and the town will soon be an old field; the settling out in villages has been repeatedly
pressed by the agent for Indian affairs, and with considerable success; they have
seven villages belonging to this town.

Ist. New-yau-cau; named after New York. It is on the left bank of Tallapoosa,
twenty miles above Oc-fus-kee;* these people lived formerly at Tote-pauf-cau, (spunk-
knot) on Chat-to-ho-che, and moved from thence in 1777.6 They would not take
part in the war between the United States and Great Britian and determined to
retire from their settlements, which, through the rage of war, might feel the effects
of the resentment of the people of the United States when roused by the conduct of
the red people, as they were placed between the combatants. The town is on a flat,
bordering on the river; the adjoining landsare broken or wavingand stony; on the oppo-
site side they are broken, stony; thegrowthis pine, oak and hickory. The flat strips of
land on the river, above and below, are generally narrow; the adjoining land is broken,

1 Bartram, Travels, p. 462; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 45; Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.
2 Hawkins, op. cit.; also Early map, pl. 9.

3 Ga. Col. Docs., vil, p. 523.

4 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., IV, p. 323.

5 In notes made in 1797 he says “eighteen miles.’”,—Ga. Hist. Sce. Colls., 1x, p. 169.

6 The Lib. Cong. MS. says ‘‘after the year 1777.”’

250 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

with oak, hickory,and pine. The branches all have reed; they have a fine ford at the
upper end of the town; the river is one hundred and twenty yards wide. Some of the
people have settled out from the town, and they have good land on Im-mook-fau
Creek, which joins the right side of the river, two miles below the town.?

2d. Took-au-bat-che tal-lau-has-see; this village received in part a new name in
1797, Tal-lo-wau moo-chas-see (new town). It is on the right bank of the river,
four miles above New-yau-cau;? the land around it is broken and stony; off the
river the hills are waving; and post oak, hard shelled hickory, pine, and on the ridges,
chestnut is the growth.

3d. Im-mook-fau (a gorget made of aconch). This village is four miles west from
Tookaubatche [Tal-lauhas-see], on Immookfau Creek, which joins the right side of
Tallapoosa, two miles below New-yau-cau. The settlers are from Chu-le-oc-who-
cat-lau and Sooc-he-ah; they have fine rich flats on the creek, and good range for
their cattle; they possess some hogs, cattle, and horses, and begin to be attentive
to them.

4th. Tooh-to-cau-gee, from tooh-to, a corn house, and cau-gee, fixed or standing.’
The Indians of Oc-fus-kee formerly built a corn house here for the convenience of
their hunters and put their corn there for their support during the hunting season.
It is on the right bank of Tallapoosa, twenty miles above New-yau-cau;‘ the settle-
ments are on the narrow flat margins of the river on both sides. On the left side the
mountains terminate here, the uplands are too poor and broken for cultivation; the
path from E-tow-wah, in the Cherokee country, over the tops of these mountains, is a
pretty good one. It winds down the mountains to this village; the river is here one
hundred and twenty yards wide, a beautiful clear stream. On therightside, off from
the river flats, the land is waving, with oak, hickory and pine, gravelly, and in some
places large sheets of rock which wave as the land. The grit is coarse, but some of
it is fit for mill stones; the land is good for corn, the trees are all small, with some
chesnut on the ridges; the range is a good one for stock; reed is found on all the
branches; on the path to New-yau-cau there is some large rock,{ the vein lies south-
west; they are in two rows parallel with each other and the land good in their neigh-
borhood.

5th. Au-che-nau-ul-gau; from Au-che-nau, cedar, and ul-gau, all; a cedar grove.
These settlers are from Loo-chau-po-gau (the resort of terrapin). It is on a creek,
near the old town, forty miles above New-yau-cau. This settlement is the farthest
north of all the Creeks; the land is very broken in the neighborhood. West of this
village, post and black oak, all small; the soil is dark and stiff with coarse gravel
and in some places stone; from the color of the earth in places there must be iron ore;
the streams from the glades form fine little creeks, branches of the Tallapoosa. The
land on their borders is broken, stiff, stony and rich, affording fine mill seats, and on
the whole it is a country where the Indians might have desirable settlements; the
path from E-tow-woh to Hill-au-bee passes through these glades.

6th. E-pe-sau-gee; this village is on a large creek which gives name to it and
enters the Tallapoosa opposite Oc-fus-kee. The creek has its source in the ridge,
dividing the waters of this river from Chat-to-ho-che; it is thirty yards wide and
has a rocky bottom; they have forty settlers in the village, who have fenced their
fields this season for the benefit of their stock, and they have all of them cattle, hogs,
and horses. They have some good land on the creek, but generally it is broken, the

1 Near this town is Horse Shoe Bend, the scene of Jackson’s decisive victory over the Creeks, March 27,
1814.

2 Tn notes taken in 1797 he says ‘‘6 miles.’’—Ga Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 170.

3 Jackson Lewis, one of the writer’s informants, says it means ‘‘two corncribs,’’ and this has the
sanction of Hawkins (Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 33). It seems te be composed of tohto, corncrib, and
kagi, to be or to set up. See Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg.,1, p. 148.

4In notes taken in 1797 he says ‘15 miles.’’—Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1X, p. 169.

eR eeths or OE Rati ars Od ann Agger nt:

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 251

strips of flat land are narrow; the broken is gravelly, with oak, hickory and pine, not
very inviting. Four of these villages have valuable stocks of cattle. McCartney
has one hundred; E-cun-cha-te E-maut-lau, one hundred; Tote-cuh Haujo, one
hundred, and Took{aubatche] Micco, two hundred.

7th. Sooc-he-ah; from Sooc-cau, a hog, and he-ah, here,! called by the traders, hog
range. It is situated on the right bank of Tallapoosa, twelve miles above Oc-fus-kee.
It is a small settlement, the land is very broken, the flats on the river are narrow, the
river broad and shoally. These settlers have moved, and joined Im-mook-fau, with
a few exceptions.’

To these must be added:

Oc-fus-coo-che (little Oc-fus-kee) is a part of the small village, four miles above New-
yau-cau. Some of these people lived at Oc-fus-kee nene, on the Chat-to-ho-che, from
whence they were driven by an enterprising volunteer party from Georgia, the 27th
September, 1793.°

During the Green Peach war many Okfuskee settled in the edge of
the Cherokee Nation, near Braggs, Oklahoma, and afterwards some
of them remained there along with a number of the Okchai Indians.

THe ABIHKA

The Abihka constituted one of the most ancient divisions of the
true Muskogee, appearing in the oldest migration legends, and are reck-
oned one of the four “foundation towns” of the confederacy. In
ceremonial speeches they were called Abihka-nagi, though what
nagi signifies no one at the present time knows. They were also called
“the door shutters’? because they guarded the northern border of
the confederacy against attack. Hawkins says that among the
oldest chiefs the name of this tribe was sometimes extended to the
entire Creek Nation.‘ Du Pratz, who, like Iberville, distinguishes
most of the true Muskogee as Conchacs, says that he believed the
terms Abihka and Conchac applied to one people.’ The relations of
this tribe were naturally most intimate with the Coosa Indians.
Hamilton quotes a Spanish manuscript of 1806 in which it is said
that the Abihka and Coosa were as one pueblo divided into two by
swift rivers.* Later they adopted a large portion of the refugee
Natchez, who ultimately became completely absorbed. Stiggins,
himself a Natchez, has the following to say regarding the Abihka and
the people of their adoption:

The Au bih ka tribe reside indiscriminately in the Talladega valley with the Natche

tribe, who they admitted to locate and assimilate with their tribe as one people indi-
visible a little more than a century ago. They at this day only pretend to know and

1 Hawkins seems to have gotten hold of a mongrel expression, half Creek, half English. The proper
Creek designation was Suka-ispoga.

2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, pp. 45-48; rx, p. 170.

3Ibid., p. 51.

4Tbid., p. 52.

6 Du Pratz, La Louisiane, n, p. 208.

6 Hamilton, Col. Mobile, 1910, p. 572.

252 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73
distinguish their tribes from the mother’s side of descent, but they are as one people
with the Natches at this time, ... and why may they not by conjecture be entitled
to the claim of the primitive Muscogee more than any other of the tribes, for they are
not discriminated by any antient denomination that is known of. For their present
appellation is derived from their manner of approveing or acquiescing a proposition,
Tho’ the national tongue is spoken by the tribe in all its purity, yet most notorious they
assent or approbate what you may say to them in conversation with the long aspiration
aw whereas the rest of the nation approbate or answer short caw. From their singular
manner of answering or approbating they got the name of aw biw ka. Moreover, the
rest of the Indians in talking of them and their tongue aptly call it the aw bih ka tongue,
and never resort to the appelation of Ispocoga except in a national way.... A brass
drum that was in their possession not a half century ago is kept asa trophy. And it is
said by them to have been got by their ancestors in times of old from a people who
invaded or past in a hostile manner through their country comeing from up the river,
that they were not like any people they ever saw before, that they were ferocious,
proud, and impudent in their manners. From the traditional circumstance of the
brass drum it would lead to the inference that the proud people alluded to was the
escort of Ferdinand Soto, and that the Indians came in possession of one of his drums
by some means.

Another native explanation for the tribal name is the following,
originally obtained from a former Creek head chief, Spahi’tci, and
related to me by the late Creek chief, Mr. G. W: Grayson: At a
certain time there was a contest for supremacy between the Kasihta,
Coweta, Chickasaw, and Abihka, and this consisted in seeing which
tribe could bring in the most scalps and heap them highest around
the ball post. Kasihta brought in the most, Coweta the next, the
Chickasaw still fewer, and Abihka brought in only a very small
number, which were thrown about the base of the post in a careless
manner. From this circumstance they came to be called Abihka
because abi‘ka i/djita means ‘“‘to heap up in a careless manner.”
Practically the same story is told by Hawkins? Of course this is not
related by the Abihka themselves and is simply a folk explanation.

The interpretation given by Stiggins appears very’ plausible, but so -

far I have not been able to identify the linguistic fact on which it is
based, and perhaps it is no longer possible to do so.’

I have spoken of the confusion which has resulted from the exist-
ence of an Abihkutci town occupied by Abihka Indians and another
occupied by Okfuskee Indians.‘ Although Abihka sometimes
appears on maps, it is curious that as soon as we have a specific town
it is called Abihkutci. This appears first, so far as I am aware,® on
the De Crenay map of 1733. It is also on the Bowen and Gibson
and Mitchell maps of 1755, on the Evans map of 1777, the D’Anville
map of 1790, and many others of the period. We find it in the

1 Stiggins, MS. Nevertheless from what Swan says regarding the number of British drums in Creek
towns and the esteem in which they were held it is possible that this Abihka specimen was of much more
recent introduction. See Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 275.

2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 10, p. 82.

3 Mr. H. S. Halbert suggests a possible derivation from the Choctaw aiabika, ““unhealthful place.”

4 See p. 247.

5 Plate 5; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.

‘
.
:
;
;
]

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 253

census lists of 1738,! 1750,‘ 1760, and 1761, in the lists of Bartram,
Swan, and Hawkins, and in the census list of 1832.2, Few events of
importance are connected with the history of this tribe. In 1716,
according to the South Carolina documents, they suffered a severe
defeat from the Cherokee,* and this was perhaps the beginning of
those Cherokee aggressions on Creek territory which forced the
Creeks out of the Tennessee Valley. If we may believe some Cherokee
legends, however, that tribe had occupied much of the same country
at an earlier date.*

The following is Hawkins’s description of the Abihka town as it
appeared in 1799:

Au-be-coo-che, is on Nau-chee creek, five miles from the river, on the right bank of
the creek, on a flat one mile wide. The growth is hard-shelled hickory. The town
spreads itself out and is scattered on both sides of the creek, in the neighborhood of
very high hills, which descend back into waving, rich land, fine for wheat or corn;
the bottoms all rich; the neighborhood abounds in limestone, and large limestone
springs; they have one above, and one below the town; the timber on the rich lands
is oak, hickory, walnut, poplar, and mulberry.

There is a very large cave north of the town, the entrance of which is small, on the
side of a hill. It is much divided, and some of the rooms appear as the work of art;
the doors regular; in several parts of the cave saltpetre is to be seen in crystals. On
We-wo-cau creek there is a fine mill seat; the water is contracted by two hills;
the fail twenty feet; and the land in the neighborhood very rich; cane is found on
the creeks, and reed grows well on these lands.

This town is one of the oldest in the nation; and sometimes, among the oldest
chiefs, it gives name to the nation Au-be-cuh. Here some of the oldest customs had
their origin. The law against adultery was passed here, and that to regulate mar-
riages. To constitute legal marriage a man must build a house, make his crop and
gather it in; then make his hunt and bring home the meat; putting all this in the
possession of his wife ends the ceremony and they are married, or, as the Indians ex-
press it, the woman is bound, and not till then. This information is obtained from
Co-tau-lau (Tus-se-ki-ah Mic-co of Coosau), an old and respectable chief, descended
from Nau-che. He lives near We-o-coof-ke, has accumulated a handsome property,
owns a fine stock, is a man of much information, and of great influence among the ©
Indians of the towns in the neighborhood of this.

They have no fences, and but a few hogs, horses, and cattle; they are attentive to
white people who live among them, and particularly so to white women.®

The Abihka took practically no part in the Creek uprising of 1813.
After their removal to Oklahoma they established their first square
_ ground a few miles from Eufaula. Later many of them moved far-
ther west, following the game, and they established another square,
sometimes called ‘‘Abihka-in-the-west.”” Both of these have been
long abandoned.

Before they left the old country two branch:towns had arisen—
Talladega [Taladigi] and Kan-tcati [Kan tcati] (Red ground). They

1MSS., Ayer Coll.
2 Miss. Proy. Arch., 1, p. 95; Ga. Col. Docs., vml, p. 523; Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schoolcraft, Ind.
“cep Tal cla Hist. Soe. Colls., m1, p. 25; Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., pp. 315-318.

4 See p. 213.
5 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 11, pp. 41-42; 1x, p. 170.

954 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [puue. 73

were perhaps late in forming, since they do not appear separately
listed before the census of 1832.!_ There is a place called ‘‘Conchar-
dee” a few miles northwest of Talladega, in the county of the same
name, Alabama. After their removal the Kan-tcati busk ground
was soon given up, but that of Talladega has persisted down to the
present day (1912).

Gatschet enumerates two other Abihka towns, Tcahki tako or Big
Shoal and Kayomalgi.2 The former was on Choccolocco (‘Big
Shoal’’) Creek in Calhoun or Talladega County, Ala., and is to be
‘ distingnished carefully from the Okfuskee town so called.* There
is some -reason for thinking that Kayomalgi may have been settled
by Shawnee,‘ though in 1772 a Chickasaw settlement was made on
the creek which bore this name. ‘‘The Lun-ham-ga Town in the
Abecas”’ is mentioned by Tobias Fitch in 1725.°

On the Lamhatty map is a town called ‘‘Apeicah,’”’ located
apparently on the east bank of the lower Chattahoochee.” This
may perhaps be intended for Abihka, but if so it is badly misplaced.
We have no knowledge of any portion of the Abihka people living
so far to the south and east.

Tue HorrwaHnALi

The first of all red or war towns among the Upper Creeks to
appear in history is Liwahali, or, in the ancient form of the word,
Holiwahali, a name which signifies ‘‘to share out or divide war”
(hoti, war, awahali, to divide out). The explanation of this is given
below. At the present time some Creeks say that Hotiwahali, Atasi,
and Kealedji separated from Tukabahchee in the order given, but
this story rather typifies the terms of friendship between them than
explains their real origin, though there may be more substantial
grounds for the belief in a common origin in the cases of the two
latter. Hotiwahali, however, goes back to a remote historical period,
for there can be little doubt that it is the Ulibahali of Ranjel® and the
Ullibahali of Elvas.*° This word might be given an interpretation in
the Alabama language, but it is unlikely that any Alabama other than
the Tawasa were on Tallapoosa River in De Soto’s time. At any rate
the town described by Ranjel and Elvas was on a river and in much the
same position as that in which we later find Holiwahali. It was fenced
about with palisades, erected and loopholed in the usual Indian manner.

1Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 304-307.

2 Ala. Hist. Soc., Mise. Colls., 1, p. 391.

3 See p. 249.

4 See p. 319.

6 Taitt in Mereness, Trav. in Amer. Col., pp. 531-532.
§ Thid., p. 189.

7 Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol. X, p. 569.

8 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 113.

9 Tbid., I, p. 84.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 255

Ranjel speaks of the grapes of this place as of particular excellence,
better than any the Spaniards had tasted in Coosa, or farther north.
Here it was learned the Indians had planned to attempt to rescue the
chief of Coosa, whom De Soto carried along as prisoner, but the Coosa
chief commanded them to lay aside their arms, which they did. Of
course the Spaniards interpreted this action as that of vassals obey-
ing the commands of their lord, but the relations between the two
towns were probably merely of alliance and friendship.

The sergeant major and 200 soldiers sent in search of Coosa by De
Luna in 1560 reached this place after a long and toilsome journey.
Padilla says:

. On the fiftieth day after their departure from Nanipacna, they discovered,
on the banks of a river, several little Indian houses, the sight of which was a very great
consolation to those, who in the immense solitude and almost facing starvation, had
not seen a human inhabitant of those parts. The biggest river there was called Oli-
bahali and had a more numerous population, which, even so, wasquitesmall. Inthose
hamlets they had corn, beans, and calabashes, but their abundance meant almost
famine to the state of starvation the Spaniards were in. When the Indians per-
ceived armed Spaniards they feared ill treatment as they had received it in the past,
but being reassured, they returned to their houses, and the Spaniards retired outside
the villages, thus avoiding frightening them. Through interpreters they communi-
cated with them, giving them clothes in exchange for corn, which to both parties
meant a great deal. The Spaniards needed food and found bread by means of these
exchanges; the Indians did not wish any money, as they did not know it nor had they
appreciated its value at any time since their remotest antiquity. What they value
most are clothes and they treasured on this occasion the ribbons and the trinkets of
colored beads which the Spaniards gave them. The soldiers were very glad for a rest
at that place, although not free from misgivings concerning the Indians. They put
out sentinels at night, as much in order to prevent the Indians from harming them,
as their own men from going over among the Indians. At least they were all fed and
it was necessary to remain at that place for several days, waiting for some of their com-
panions who had remained behind, partly for lack of food and partly on account of
illness, and those were the first days since they had left Nanipacna that they really
ceased walking. .. .

Although the Indians of Olibahali showed themselves to be friends of the Spaniards,
and were at peace with them, they may not have wished so many on account of the
impairment to their food staples which they gathered to last them a whole year, and
which their guests consumed within a few days. The corn was beginning to give
out, and fearing still greater need, which was sure to come at that pace, they resorted
to a wary invention to get the Spaniards out of their country. He who says that the
Indians are barbarians and lack cunning, does not know them. They have cunning,
and the vexations inflicted upon them by the Spaniards have made them more and
more skilled with the many opportunities afforded them by the Spaniards. One day
just after sunset, the dark of night fast approaching, an Indian arrived at the camp
of the Spaniards, who, to judge from his appearance and demeanor, seemed to be a
chief; he was accompanied by four other Indians. He carried the emblems of an
ambassador, and he stated that he was such, and came from the great province of Coza.
He carried in his hand a cane of six palmos? in length, adorned at the top with white
feathers, which appeared to be those of a heron. It was the custom of the Indians to

2 One “palmo”’ is about 8 inches.

256 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

emphasize their messages of peace by wearing white feathers, their declaration of war
by red ones. When the ambassador arrived within sight of the Spaniards, he made
his obeisance after his fashion and said that the lord of Coza had sent him in the name
of the whole province, offering it to them and thanking them in advance for their
inclination to use it, and entreating them that his desires to receive them should not
remain unfulfilled; that they should hurry to go there as he offered them those who
would guide them and serve them. This Indian was a neighbour of those of Olibahali,
and between them they had invented this miserable lie to get the Spaniards, whose
main intention was to reach the province of Coza, out of their own territory. As the
captains and priests were quite innocent of cunning they were overjoyed by this
embassy, although their prudence told them that it might be artfulness on the part
of those of Coza to ensnare them some way or other. Tor that reason their gratefulness,
which in the opinion of some was due to such generous offerings, was quite guarded.
At first they wished to send a captain with twelve soldiers to thank the lord of Coza
for his offerings, but they finally agreed they ought not to separate, but travel all
together, moving slowly towards the province of Coza; and upon asking the sham
ambassador how many leagues there were to his province, he tcld them there were
twenty. They told him to go and offer their thanks and appreciation for his coming
and carry the news that the camp would break up immediately from Olibahali, in
answer to the summons received, and soon go to see the lord of Coza.

The ambassador thereupon said that he had orders to guide and serve them, and in
order to fulfill all his duties and do likewise what they should order him, he would
accompany them one day’s journey and that he would precede them. Thus they all
left Olibahali together, and as soon as the ambassador had attained his intention to
get them away from that place, he suddenly disappeared, showing himself to be a true
Indian, who did not know how to carry to the end the plot he commenced, by bidding
good-bye to the Spaniards on his way to Coza, although he was returning to his own
country. As we have explained one side of the Indian character, we might just as

well explain the other, namely, that although they are ingenious and ready schemers, ~

they lack prudence and perseverance in carrying out the plot. This envoy com-
menced his scheme quite well, but he was too easily satisfied at merely putting them
on the road, and he caused himself to be suspected in their eyes by his sudden dis-
appearance. The prudent Spaniards discovered the truth by making a few investi-
gations. They were not taken aback by the fact that the Indians wished to get rid
of them; they were only astonished at having received the invitation that man had
brought. Then they continued their journey in search of the land of promise which
had been so celebrated by all who had spoken about it.!

On their return they probably passed through the same place, but
nothing is said about it.

On the Lamhatty map is a town called ‘‘Cheeawoole,” west of a
river which appears to be the Flint, and from the spelling this town
was probably identical with the one under discussion.? It appears in
the census list of 1738 as ‘““Yuguale,’’* in that of 1750 as ““Ycouale,”’*
in that of 1760 under the name ‘ Telouales,’’* and in that of 1761 as
‘“‘Chewallee,’’ where it is credited with 35 hunters, and is assigned
to the trader James Germany along with Fus-hatchee and Kolomi.®
In 1797 the traders were James Russel and Abraham M. Mordecai,

2 Amer. Anthrop.;n.s. vol. x, p. 570.
3-MSS., Ayer Coll.

4 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 95.

5 Ga. Col. Does., VI, p. 523.

:
é
f

le a

a” ae ee

MR SY Ne

ja:

Ets,

|
7 i).

4
+

a,
(Oy

bes esa

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 957

the latter a Jew.’ Bartram calls it ‘Cluale,’’ Swan ‘‘Clewauleys,’’?
while in the census enumeration of 1832 it appears as “‘Clewalla.’’?
Hawkins describes it as follows:

Ho-ith-le-wau-le, from Ho-ith-le, war, and wau-le, to share out or divide. This
town had, formerly, the right to declare war;* the declaration was sent first to Took-
au-bat-che, and thence throughout the nation, and they appointed the rendezvous
of the warriors. It is on the right bank of the Tallapoosa, five miles below Aut-tos-see.
In descending the river on the left side from Aut-tos-see, is two miles across Ke-bi-
hat-che; thence one mile and a half O-fuck-she, and enter the fields of the town; the
fields extend down the river for one and one-half miles; the town is on the right bank,
on a narrow strip of good land; and back of it, under high red cliffs, are cypress ponds.
It borders west on Autoshatche twenty-five feet wide.

These people have some cattle, and a few hogs and horses; they have some settle-
ments up O-fuck-she; the increase of property among them, and the inconvenience
attendant on their situation, their settlement being on the right side of the river,
and their fields and stock on the left, brought the well-disposed to listen with atten-
tion to the plan of civilization, and to comment freely on their bad management.
The town divided against itself; the idlers and the ill-disposed remained in the town,
and ‘the others moved over the river and fenced their fields. On this side the land is
good and level, and the range out from the river good to the sources of O-fuc-she.
On the other side, the high broken land comes close to the river. It is broken pine
barren, back of that. The situation of the town is low and unhealthy; and this
remark applies to all the towns on Tallapoosa, below the falls.

O-fuec-she has its source near Ko-e-ne-cuh, thirty miles from the river, and runs
north. It has eight or nine forks, and the land is good on all of them. The growth
is oak, hickory, poplar, cherry, persimmon, with cane brakes on the flats and hills. It
is a delightful range for stock, and was preserved by the Indians for bears and called
the beloved bear-ground. Every town had a reserve of this sort exclusively; but
as the cattle increase and the bears decrease, they are hunted in common. This
creek is sixty® feet wide, has steep banks, and is difficult to cross, when the waters
are high.

Kebihatche has its source to the east, and is parallel with Ca-le-be-hat-che; the
margins of the creek have rich flats bordering pine forest or post oak hills.®

If our identification of Ulibahali with this town is correct, the
name which it bears would indicate that the Creek confederacy was
in existence as far back as the period of De Soto. The fission in the
town described by Hawkins was evidently that which resulted in the
formation of Laplako, since it is only after this time—namely, in the
census list of 1832’—that we find Lapltako mentioned. According
to the story now related a quarrel broke out among the Holiwahali
while they were drinking, and afterwards part of them moved away
to a creek where a kind of cane grew called fawa. From this they
received their present name, a contraction of lawa lako, big lawa.
Laplako comprised the more thrifty and energetic part of the popu-

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 168.

2 Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

3 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 315-318.

4 This fact is still remembered by some of the older Creek Indians.
5 The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘‘20.’’

6 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, pp. 32-33.

7 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 268-270.

148061 °—22 17

258 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

lation, and they have maintained a dance ground down to the pres-
ent time, although not a regular square. The Hotiwahali proper
have maintained neither dance ground nor square.

Tue HIisi

We now come to three towns or groups of towns—Hilibi, Eufaula,
and Wakokai—which, while they have had a long separate existence,
claim and in recent years have maintained terms of the closest inti-
macy. Their square grounds are much the same and they generally
agree in selecting their chief from the Aktayatci clan. It is possible
that this points to a common origin at some time in the remote past,
but it would be hazardous to suggest it in stronger terms. From
one of the best-informed Hilibi Indians I obtained the following
tradition regarding the origin of his town. It was, he said,
founded by a Tukpafka Indian belonging to the Aktayatci clan.
Having suffered defeat in a ball game he determined to leave his
own people, so he went away and founded another, gathering about
him persons from many towns, but especially from Tukabahchee.
When the people began to discuss what name they should give to
their settlement their leader said ‘‘Quick shall be my name,’ and
that is what Hilibi (hilikbi) signifies. It was because it grew up so
rapidly. This story was confirmed independently by another of
the best-informed old men, except that he represented the town
as built up entirely of Tukpafka Indians. Tukpafka was, however,
only a branch, and probably a late branch, of Wakokai, therefore
we should have to look for an origin from the latter town. The
historical value of this tradition may well be doubted, even with
such emendation, but it serves to show the mental association be-
tween the places mentioned.

After De Soto had arrived at Cofitachequi, Ranjel states that ‘on
Friday, May 7, Baltasar de Gallegos, with the most of the soldiers of
the army, arrived at [api to eat seven barbacoas of corn that they
said were stored for the woman chief.’’! If Cofitachequi was Kasihta
it is quite possible that other Muskogee settlements were in the neigh-
borhood and that Hlapi was the town later called Hilibi. It is
true that Hilibi is known to us almost entirely as a town of the Upper
Creeks, but several of the well-known Upper Creek towns of later
times were once as far east as the Ocmulgee. In northwestern Georgia
is a creek called Hilibi Creek, which may mark a former town site of
this tribe while on its way west. When we first get a clear historic
view of the town it is on the creek which still bears the name in
Alabama. On the De Crenay map the name is spelled “ TIlapé,”
which suggests the form given by Ranjel.? The form is used by the
Lower Creeks. It appears in the census lists of 1738 and 1750 as

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, u, p. 100. 1 Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.

LR RET er ha en ea

DONT ay By EO Ae Som, Yh Dee ag

pat oma,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 259

“Ylapé,’" and in those of 1760? and 1761.2 In the third of these
there is also a “Little Hilibi.”? In 1761 it was assigned, along with
its outsettlements, to Crook & Co.2 Bartram places it among the
Coosa towns,‘ and Swan gives it as one of the towns ‘‘ central, inland,
in the high country, between the Coosa and Tallapoosee Rivers, in
the district called the Hillabees.”® The town and its branches are
thus described by Hawkins:

Hill-au-bee; on Col-luf-fa-dee [kalofti=“bluff’’], which joins Hill-au-bee Creek,
on the right side, one mile below the town. Hill-au-bee joins the Tallapoosa on its
right bank, eight miles below New-yau-cau. Onechief only, Ene-hau-thluc-co Hau-jo
[Heniha tako Hadjo], resides in the town; the people are settled out in the four
following villages:

Ist. Thl&-noo-che au-bau-lau; from thlenne [lini], a mountain, oo-che [utci], little,
and au-bau-lau [abéla], over. The name is expressive of its position. It is situated
over alittle mountain, fifteen miles above the town, on the northwest branch of Hill-
au-bee Creek; the town house of this village is on the left side of the creek.

2nd. Au-net-te chap-co; from au-net-te, a swamp, and chapco, long.* It is situ-
ated on Choo-fun-tau-lau-hat-che [tcufi italwa hatci, Rabbit Town Creek], which
joins Hill-au-bee Creek three miles north from the town: the village is ten miles
above the town.

3d. E-chuse-is-li-gau (where a young thing was found). A young child was
found here, and that circumstance gives it the name. This village is four miles
below the town, on the left side of Hill-au-bee Creek.

4th. Ook-tau-hau-zau-see; from ook-tau-hau [oktaha], sand, and zau-see [sasi], a
great deal. It is two miles from the town, on a creek of that name, a branch of Hill-
au-bee, which it joins a quarter of a mile below Col-luf-fa-dee, at a great shoal.

The land on these creeks, within the scope of the four villages, is broken and stoney,
with coarse gravel; the bottoms and small bends of the creeks and branches are rich.
The upland is generally stiff, rich, and fitfor culture. Post oak, black oak, pine, and
hickory, all small, are the growth. The whole abounds in veins of reeds and reedy
branches. They call this the winter reed, as it clusters like the cane.

The villages are badly fenced, the Indians are attentive to their traders, and several
of them are careful of stock-and have cattle and hogs, and some few have horses.
Four hali-breeds have fine stocks of cattle. Thomas has one hundred and thirty cattle
and ten horses. Au-wil-lau-gee,’ the wife of O-pi-o-che-tus-tun-nug-gee,® has seventy ®
cattle. These Indians promised the agent, in 1799, to begin and fence their fields;
they have one hundred and seventy gunmen in the four villages.

Robert Grierson," the trader, a native of Scotland, has, by a steady conduct, con-
tributed to mend the manners of these people. He has five children, half breeds, and
governs them as Indians, and makes them and his whole family respect him, and is

1 MSS., Ayer Coll.

2 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 95.

* Ga. Col. Docs., vim, p. 523.

‘Bartram, Travels, p. 462.

6 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

6 Au-net-te really means a grassy thicket that one can hardly get through; a swamp is pitofa. A battle
was fought here on Jan. 24, 1814.

7 Awilgi, ‘‘they came out.’’

8 Abohiyutci tastanagi, ‘“ Putting-something-down warrior.”

®° The published edition has ‘‘seven.”

10 Tn notes taken in 1797 Hawkins adds that ‘‘ David Hay was his hireling,’’ and that another white man
in Hilibi, evidently a trader, was “Stephen Hawkins, an active man of weak mind; fond of drink, and much
of a savage when drunk.’’—Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 169. Robert Grierson was the direct ancestor of
the late G. W. Grayson, chief of the Creek Nation.

260 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the only man who does so in the Upper Creeks. He has three hundred cattle and
thirty horses; he has, on the recommendation of the agent for Indian affairs, set up a
manufactury of cotton cloth; he plants the green-seed cotton, it being too cold for the
blackseed. He has raised a quantity for market, but finds it more profitable to
manufacture it; he has employed an active girl of Georgia, Rachael Spillard, who
was in the Cherokee department, to superintend, and allows her two hundred dollars
per annum. He employs eleven hands, red, white, and black, in spinning and
weaving, and the other part of his family in raising and preparing the cotton for them.
His wife, an Indian woman, spins, and is fond of it; and he has a little daughter who
spins well. He employs the Indian women to gather in the cotton from the fields,
and has expectations of prevailing on them to take an active part in spinning.

Hill-au-bee creek has a rocky bottom, covered in many places with moss. In the
spring of the year the cattle of the villages crowd after it, and are fond of it. From
thence they are collected together by their owners, to mark and brand the young
ones.

The climate is mild; the water seldom freezes; they have mast every other year,
and peaches for the three last years. The range is a good one for stock. The owners
of horses have a place called a stomp. They select a place of good food, cut down a
tree or two, and make salt logs. Here the horses gather of themselves in the fly
season. They have in the village a few thriving peach trees, and there is much
gravelly land, which would be fine for them.!

A battle was fought near Hilibi town on November 18, 1813.

Another village which separated from Hilibi was known as Ki-
tcopataki, “a wooden mortar spread out,” perhaps referring to an
old rotten mortar. It may have originated after Hawkins’s time,
since it is first mentioned in the census rolls of 1832.2. It is the only
branch clearly remembered at the present day. Of the older villages |
the most prominent was Oktahasasi, which appears to have main-
tained a separate existence for a considerable period. It is not to
be confused with a modern settlement known as Oktaha, “Sand
town,” composed of families which had fled from the other villages
to avoid being involved in the Creek-American war. After their
removal to Oklahoma the latter lived for a time upon the Verdigris
River, but subsequently appear to have separated. Kitcopatalki
does not have a distinct busk ground at the present time, but that of
Hilibi is (1912) kept up near Hanna, Oklahoma.

THE EUFAULA

The Eufaula tribe was an independent body as far back as history
takes us. According to one of my informants they branched off
from Kealedji, while another seemed to think that they originated
from Hilibi. Practically no confidence can be placed in these opin-
ions. Not even a plausible guess can be furnished by the living
Indians regarding the origin of the name. It is an interesting com-
mentary on the reliability of name interpretation that a story is told
to account for the designation of this place, the point of which depends
on its resemblance to the English “you fall.”

1 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., m1, pp. 43-45.
31 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 318-319.

ELLIO REM L

ha ete

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 961

In Bartow County, Georgia, is a creek called Euharlee, corrupted
from Cherokee Yuhali. According to the Cherokee, fide Mooney, this
in turn is a corruption of the Creek tribal name Eufaula. There is
every reason to credit this and to suppose that the Eufaula were once
located in the neighborhood. Perhaps it was their seat before the
Yamasee war, in 1715. As the Kasihta and Kawita were in this
region there is no reason why the Eufaula may not have been there
as well. Their next location known to us was on Talladega Creek,
a few miles south of the present Talladega, Alabama. It was after-
wards known as Eufaula Old Town, but Hawkins calls it ‘‘ Eu-fau-lau-
hat-che”’ (Eufaula Creek or River), and describes it as follows:

Eau-fau-lau-hat-che, is fifteen miles up that creek [Eufaula or Talladega], on a flat
of half a mile, bordering on a branch. On the left side of the creek the land is rich
and waving; on the right sides are steep hills sloping off waving, rich land; hickory,
oak, poplar and walnut. It is well watered, and the whole a desirable limestone
country; they have fine stocks of cattle, horses, and hogs.”

This description dates from a time long after the Eufaula settle-
ments next to be considered had been made, but it is probable that
its inhabitants were also Eufaulas, some who had remained behind
after the removal of the bulk of the population. James Lesley was
the trader stationed there in 1796. He died in the spring of 1799.8
Bartram and Swan mention this town, which they call Upper
Eufaula, Swan describing it as ‘‘the Creek town farthest up Coosa
River.’’# ,

At a comparatively early date in the eighteenth century, as ap-
pears from the maps, particularly that of De Crenay,® a large part
of the Eufaula Indians moved southeast and settled on the middle
course of the Tallapoosa. These are the ‘“‘Lower Yufale”’ of Bar-
tram, and the “Eu-fau-lau”’ of Hawkins.* Swan mentions two
settlements here, ‘‘Big Ufala’”’ and “Little Ufala.’’’ It is the
Eufaula of the censuses of 1738, 1750, 1760, and 1761.8 The following
is Hawkins’s description of this town.

Eu-fau-lau; on the right bank of Tallapoosa, five miles below Oc-fus-kee, on that side
of the river, and but two in a direct line; the lands on the river are fit for culture; but
the flats are narrow, joined to pine hills and reedy branches.

They have hogs and cattle, and the range is a good one; they have moss in the shoals
of the river; there are belonging to this town, seventy gun men, and they have begun
to settle out for the benefit of their stock. This season, some of the villagers have

fenced their fields. They have some fine land on Hat-che-lus-te [Hatci lasti] and
several settlements there, but no fences: this creek joins the right side of the river, two

119th Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p. 547.

2 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., m1, pp. 42-43.

3 Ibid., rx, pp. 34, 169.

4 Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

6 Plate 5; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.

6 Bartram, op. cit.; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 25.

7S$choolcraft, op. cit.

8MSS., Ayer Coll.; Miss. Prov. Arch. 1, p. 95; Ga. Col. Docs, vim, p. 523.

262 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY ‘[BuLL. 73

miles below the town. On Woc-cau E-hoo-te [Waka ihuti, ‘‘cow yard”’], this year,1799,
the villages, five families in all, have fenced their fields, and they have promised the
agent to use the plough the next season. On black creek, Co-no-fix-ico [Kono fiksiko;
kono=“‘skunk”’] has one hundred cattle, and makes butter and cheese. John ’'Towns-
hend, the trader of the town, is an honest Englishman, who has resided many years in
the nation, and raised a numerous family, who conduct themselves well. His daugh-
ters, who are married, conduct themselves well, have stocks of cattle, are attentive to
them, make butter and cheese, and promise to raise cotton and learn to spin. The
principal cattle holders are Conofixico, who has one hundred; Choc-lo Emautlau’s
stock is on the decline, thirty; Will Geddis Taupixa Micco [Tapiksi miko; tapiksi=
“flat” ], one hundred; Co Emautlau [Kowai imala; kowai=quail,] four hundred under
careful management. John Townshend, one hundred and forty, and Sally, his daugh-
ter, fifty.?

This is the only Upper Creek town of the name represented in the
census list of 1832,? and the only one now recognized among the
Creeks in Oklahoma. It is, and since the removal always has been,
located in the extreme southeastern part of the nation near the
modern town of Eufaula, Oklahoma, which bears its name.

A Eufaula settlement was also made among the Lower Creeks, and
although this appears on -very few maps before the end of the eight-
eenth century, we know that it antedates 1733, because it occurs on
the De Crenay map of that year.*

November 20, 1752, Thomas Bosomworth visited the Eufaula town
among the Lower Creeks in search of some horses which had been
stolen from the English. He describes it as ‘“‘the Lowest in the
Nation but two” and ‘‘about forty five miles from the Cowetas, and
as it is chiefly composed of Runagados from all other Towns of the
Nation, it is reckoned one of the most unrully, as they all Command
and none obey.”’ 4

The name of this town appears in the census lists of 1760 and 1761,°
but it is wanting from the lists of Bartram and Swan. The official
trader there in 1761 was James Cussings.> Hawkins gives the follow-
ing description:

Eu-fau-lau; is fifteen miles below Sau-woog-e-lo, on the left bank of the river, on a
pine flat; the fields are on both sides of the river, on rich flats; below the town the land
is good.

These people are very poor, but generally well behaved and very friendly to white
people; they are not given to horse-stealing, have some stock, are attentive to it; they
have some land fenced, and are preparing for more; they have spread out their settle-
ments down the river; about eight miles below the town, counting on the river path,
there is a little village on good land, O-ke-teyoc-en-ne.® Some of the village is well
fenced; they raise plenty of corn and rice, and the range is a good one for stock.

From this village they have settlements down as low as the forks of the river; and
they are generally on sites well chosen, some of them well cultivated; they raise plenty

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 48; ef. Taitt in Mereness, Trav. Am. Col., p. 528.
2 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., pp. 275-278,

3 Plate 5; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.

4 Bosomworth’s MS. Journal, in 8. C. Archives.

5 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 96; Ga. Col. Does., vim, p. 522.

6 This was a branch of Sawokli; see p. 143.

SWANTON] BARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 263

of corn and rice, and have cattle, horses, and hogs. Several of these Indians have
Negroes, taken during the Revolutionary War, and where they are there is more
industry and better farms. These Negroes were, many of them, given by the agents
of Great Britain to the Indians, in payment for their services, and they generally call
themselves ‘‘ King’s gifts.”” The Negroes are all of them attentive and friendly to
white people, particularly so to those in authority.!

Lower Eufaula appears again in the census rolls of 1832, which
also mention a branch village on a creek called ‘‘Chowokolohatches. ”’ ?
Among the Creeks in Oklahoma the town is known as ‘‘ Yufa’la hopai’,
“the far-away Eufaula,” and it maintained its own square ground
for some time after the emigration, but this has now been given up.
Part of the Eufaula went to Florida in 1761 and made a settlement
afterwards known as Tecuko teati, ‘‘Red house.”’

THe WAKOKAI

The readily interpretable nature of this name, which signifies
‘‘heron breeding place,’ suggests that the Wakokai were not an
ancient Creek division; but not sufficient evidence has been found,
traditional or other, to suggest an origin from any one of the remain-
ing groups. Notice might be taken in this connection of the river
Guacuca (Wakuka) crossed by the De Soto expedition just after
leaving the Apalachee country.‘ Their first historical appearance is
probably on the De Crenay map of 1733, which represents them on
Coosa River below the Pakan tallahassee Indians.* Wakokai is now
reckoned as a White town, but was formerly, according to the best
informants, on the Red side like Hilibi and Eufaula. The name
appears in the lists of 1738, 1750, 1760, and 1761, and in those of
Bartram, Swan, and Hawkins.° The last mentioned gives the follow-
ing account of its condition in 1799:

Woc-co-coie; from woc-co, a blow-horn, and coie, a nest;’ these birds formerly
had their young here. It is on Tote-pauf-cau [Tukpafka, punk used in lighting a
fire] creek, a branch of Po-chuse-hat-che, which joins the Coo-sau, below Puc-cun-
tal-lau-has-see. The land is very broken, sharp-hilly, and stoney; the bottoms and
the fields are on the smal! bends and narrow strips of the creek; the country, off from
the town, is broken.

These people have some horses, hogs, and cattle; the range good; moss, plenty
in the creeks, and reed in the branches. Such is the attachment of horses to this
moss, or as the traders call it, salt grass, that when they are removed they retain so
great a fondness for it that they will attempt, from any distance within the neigh-
boring nations, to return to it.8

1 Ga, Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 66.

2 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., 1V, pp. 337-342, 378-379.
~ 3See p. 403.

4 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 0, p. 82.

§ Plate 5; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.

6 MSS., Ayer Lib.; Miss. Prov. Arch.,1, p. 95; Ga. Col. Docs., vim, p. 523; Bartram, Travels, p. 462;
Schooleraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 25. =

7 See above.

§ Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colis., m1, p. 43.

264 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY jaune. 73

Yet in an earlier list of towns, dated 1796, Hawkins does not men-
tion this town, but only its branches, Wiogufki and Tukpafka, of
which Wakokai is always said to be the ‘‘mother.”’ The traders are
given as John Clark, a Scotchman, and George Smith, an English-
man, respectively.t| There is evidently some confusion, however,
since a year later Hawkins gives James Clark as trader at Wakokai
and George Smith trader at Wiogufki; the name of James Simmons
is added as that of a trader at Wakokai.? Wiogufki and Tukpafka
appear again in the census rolls of 1832,? from which the older name is
wanting for the first time. A very good Hilibi informant told me that
the Wiogufki, ‘‘muddy stream,” people separated from the Wakokai
first and received their name from acreek on which they had established
themselves. <A log lay across this, which was used by the people as a
footlog, and after a time another town grew up on the side of the
creek reached by it. In time this log decayed and fell away until
it was nothing but punk, but the people of the new village said that,
although it had fallen into punk, yet they had crossed upen it,
so they took to themselves the name of Tukpafka. Regarding
the main fact of relationship between the three, there can be no
doubt, however the separation may have taken place. The Tuk-
pafka mentioned here are not to be confounded with those Okfuskee
Indians afterwards called Nuyaka.'

Some of my very best informants among the modern Creek In-
dians, including Jackson Lewis, now dead but in his lifetime one
of the most intelligent among the older men, have told me that
Sakapadai was a branch of Eufaula, although later associated with
Wiogufki and Tukpafka. One even maintained that Wiogufk itself
was a branch of Kufaula. Others, however, assured me with equal
emphasis that it had separated from the Wakokai towns, and prob-
ability is in their favor, since Benjamin Hawkins, writing in 1797,
says that Sakapadai and Wiogufki were ‘‘one fire with Woccocoie.’”®
It is, of course, possible that a more remote relationship existed, as
suggested above, between the Wakokai towns and Eufaula, and
perhaps Hilibi, but the information so far available rather points to
relationship having been assumed on the ground of an intimate
association in later times between the towns concerned. Jackson
Lewis told the following story regarding the origin of this town:

Some Eufaula left their town and tried to establish one of their own, but they were
a shiftless people and failed. Afterwards those who passed the place where they had
started their village could see old baskets lying about torn to pieces and flattened
out. From this circumstance the people of the place came to be called Sakapadai
(from saka, a basket like a hamper, and padai, ‘flattened out”). On account of the

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 34. : 4 See p. 248.
2 Ibid., p. 169. 5 Ga, Hist. Soc. Colls., 1X, p. 170.
8 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist Sess., Iv, pp. 286-292.

i
i
&
»
)
¢
<a
é
‘
r

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 265

failure of their attempt they also came to be called Tallahassee (‘‘Old town” people),
and later on Tallahasutci (‘‘Little Old town’’ people).

Gatschet, however, says that the name ‘‘probably refers to water
lilies covering the surface of a pond,” the seeds of which were eaten
by the natives.’

THe ATASI

Atasi, in its later years, was on close terms of intimacy with
Tukabahchee, of which it was said to be a branch. While this may
have been the case, its independent history extends back to very early

times. Spanish documents of the last decade of the sixteenth century

mention a town called Otaxe (Otashe), in the northernmost parts of
the province of Guale. On a few maps, representing conditions before
the Yamasee war, Atasi appears among the towns on Ocmulgee River.
It is perhaps the ‘‘Awhissie’ of Lamhatty, laid down midway
between the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers.2 On later maps it
appears on the Chattahoochee between the Kolomi and Tuskegee,
but this position was probably occupied for only a few years before
a permanent retirement was effected to the Tallapoosa. Another
location is, however, given by Hawkins on the authority of an old
Kasihta chief, Tussikaia miko, as on a creek bearing its name,
near the village of Apatai (see p. 223). A French writer of the middle
of the eighteenth century declares that the Creeks on Tallapoosa
River were formerly under absolute monarchs who resided at Atasi
“and bore the same name”’ as the town. He adds: ‘After the death
of the last of these princes there was no particular chief in this village,
but the chief of war commands. They say that this chief has gone
into the sky to see his ancestors, and that he has assured them that
he will return.” * This perhaps marks nothing more than a shift of
the chieftainship from a peace to a war clan.

At least three successive places were occupied by the Atasi on
Tallapoosa River. The first was some miles above the sharp bend
in the river at Tukabahchee, where Bartram found them in 1777-78.5
The second was five miles below Tukabahchee on the south side of
the river,® and the third a few miles higher on the north side near the
mouth of Calebee Creek. The name appears in the census lists
of 1738, 1750, 1760, and 1761.7 On the last mentioned date James
McQueen and T. Perryman were the officially recognized traders.’

1 Gatschet in Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 408.

2 Amer. Anthrop., n.S. vol. X, p. 569.

3 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., x, p. 70.

4MS., Ayer Lib.

5 Bartram, Travels, p. 448 et seq.

§ Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, pp. 40,46. ‘‘On the opposite bank [from Mr. Bailey’s house] formerly stood
the old town Ohassee [Ottassee], a beautifui rich level plane surrounded with hills, to the north, it was
formerly a canebrake, the river, makes a curve round it to the south, so that a small fence on the hill
side across would enclose it.’’—p. 40.

7MSS., Ayer Lib.; Miss Prov. Arch.,1, p. 95; Ga. Col. Docs., vm, p. 523.

266 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY | __ [Burt.738

Bartram in 1777-78 described the square of this town at some
length; his account will be given when we come to consider the
social organization of the confederacy. The name appears also in the
lists of Hawkins and on the census rolls of 1832, but is omitted by
Swan.! In 1797 the traders stationed there were Richard Bailey, a
native of England, and Josiah Fisher.2 The following is what
Hawkins has to say of it:

Aut-tos-see, on the left side of Tallapoosa, below and adjoining Ca-le-be-hat-che.
A poor, miserable looking place, fenced with small poles; the first on forks in a line
and two others on stakes hardly sufficient to keep out cattle. They have some plum
and peach trees; a swamp back of the town and some good land back of that, a flat of
oak, hickory and pine. On the right bank of the river, just below the town, they
have a fine rich cove of land which was formerly a cane brake, and has been culti-
vated.

There is, [5 miles] below the town, one good farm made by the late Richard Bailey,
and an orchard of peach trees. Mrs. Bailey, the widow, is neat, clean, and industrious,
and very attentive to the interests of her family; qualities rarely to be met with in
an Indian woman.* Her example has no effect on the Indians, even her own family,
with the exception of her own children. She has fifty bee-hives and a great supply of
honey every year; has a fine stock of hogs, cattle and horses, and they all do well.
Her son, Richard Bailey, was educated in Philadelphia by the Government, and he
has brought with him into the nation so much contempt for the Indian mode of life,
that he has got himself into discredit with them. His young brother is under the
direction of the Quakers in Philadelphia. His three sisters promise to do well, they
are industrious and can spin. Some of the Indians have cattle; but in general, they
are destitute of property.

In the year 1766 there were forty-three gun men, and lately they were estimated
at eighty. This is a much greater increase of population than is to be met with in
other towns; they appear to be stationary generally, and in some towns are on the
decrease; the apparent difference here, or increase, may be greater than the real; as
formerly men grown were rated as gun men, and now boys of fifteen, who are hunters,
are rated as gun men; they have for two years past been on the decline; are very
sickly, and have lost many of their inhabitants; they are now rated at fifty gun men
only.*

One outsettlement is mentioned by Hawkins, on ‘‘Caloebee”’ Creek,
although at the time he wrote (December 27, 1797)° it was abandoned.
It appears on the Purcell map (pl. 7) as ‘‘Callobe.”

Atasi was the seat of a leading camp of hostile Indians during the
Creek War and the site of one of its principal battles, November 29,
1813. It suffered severely in consequence, and, whether on account
of that struggle or for other causes, the number of Atasi Indians
has been reduced to a mere handful.

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 11, p. 25; Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist Sess., IV, pp. 252-254.

2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 168.

3 She belonged to the Hotalgalgi, or Wind Clan.—Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls.,1x, p.39. Misprinted
“ Otalla (wine) family.”

4 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 11, pp. 31-32.

5 Tbid., rx, p. 49.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 267

THe KoLomi

The earliest mention of Kolomi town is contained in a letter of the
Spanish lieutenant at Apalachee, Antonio Mateos, in 1686. A trans-
lation of this has been given in considering the history of the Ka-
sihta.2 The town was then probably on Ocmulgee River, where it
appears on some of the very early maps, placed close to Atasi. From
the failure of Mateos to mention Atasi it is possible that that town
was not yet in existence. From later maps we learn that after the
Yamasee war the Kolomi settled on the Chattahoochee. The maps |
show them in what is now Stewart County, Ga., but Colomokee Creek
in Clay County may perhaps mark a former settlement of Kolomi
people farther south. The name is often given on maps in the form
“Colomino.”’ * Still later they removed to the Tallapoosa, where,
as appears from Bartram, they first settled upon the east bank but
later moved across. In all these changes they seem to have kept
company with the Atasi. Their name appears in the lists of 1738,
1750, 1760, and 1761. In 1761 their officially recognized trader was
James Germany.’ Bartram thus describes the town in 1777:

Here are very extensive old fields, the abandoned plantations and commons of the
old town, on the east side of the river; but the settlement is removed, and the new
town now stands on the opposite shore, in a charming fruitful plain, under an elevated
ridge of hills, the swelling beds or bases of which are covered with a pleasing verdure
of grass; but the last ascent is steeper, and towards the summit discovers shelving
rocky cliffs, which appear to be continually splitting and bursting to pieces, scat-
tering their thin exfoliations over the tops of the grassy knolls beneath. The plain is
narrow where the town is built; their houses are neat commodious buildings, a wooden
frame with plastered walls, and roofed with Cypress bark or shingles; every habita-
tion consists of four oblong square houses, of one story, of the same form and dimen-
sions, and so situated as to form an exact square, encompassing an area or court yard
of about a quarter of an acre of ground, leaving an entrance into it at each corner.
Here is a beautiful new square or areopagus, in the centre of the new town; but the
stores of the principal trader, and two or three Indian habitations, stand near the
banks of the opposite shore on the site of the old Coolome town. The Tallapoose
River is here three hundred yards over, and about fifteen or twenty feet deep; the
water is very clear, agreeable to the taste, esteemed salubrious, and runs with a steady,
active current.® -

A little later Bartram called again and has the following to say
regarding the trader, James Germany, mentioned above:

[1] called by the way at the beautiful town of Coolome, where I tarried some time
with Mr. Germany the chief trader of the town, an elderly gentleman, but active,
cheerful and very agreeable, who received and treated me with the utmost civility
and friendship; his wife is a Creek woman, of a very amiable and worthy character

1 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 194-195.

2 See p. 221.

8 This form of the name suggests a derivation from kulo, a kind of oak with large acorns, and omin,
‘«where there are.”’ ;

4 Bartram, Travels, p. 394.

5 MSS., Ayer Lib.; Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 94; Ga. Col. Does., vm, p. 523.

6 Bartram, Travels, pp. 394-395.

2968 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

and disposition, industrious, prudent and affectionate; and by her he has several
children, whom he is desirous to send to Savanna or Charleston, for their education;
but can not prevail on his wife to consent to it.

In May, 1797, according to a list compiled by Hawkins, there was
no trader in this town, but in a subsequent list, dated September of
the same year, he gives William Gregory, who was formerly a hire-
ling of Nicholas White at Fus-hatchee.2 Swan (1791) mentions the
place,? and Hawkins (1799) thus describes it:

Coo-loo-me is below and near to Foosce-hat-che, on the right side of the river; the
town is small and compact, on a flat much too low, and subject to be overflowed in
the seasons of floods, which is once in fifteen or sixteen years, always in the winter
season, and mostly in March; they have, within two years, begun to settle back, next
to the broken lands; the cornfields are on the opposite side, joining those of Foosce-
hat-che, and extend together near four miles down the river, from one hundred to
two hundred yards wide. Back of these hills there is a rich swamp of from four to
six hundred yards wide, which, when reclaimed, must be valuable for corn and rice
and could be easily drained into the river, which seldom overflows its banks, in spring
or summer.

They have no fences; they have huts’in the fields to shelter the laborers in the
summer season from rain, and for the guards set to watch the crops while they are
growing. At this season some families move over and reside in their fields, and return
with their crops into the town. There are two paths, one through the fields on the
river bank, and the other back of the swamp. In the season for melons the Indians
of this town and Foosce-hat-che show in a particular manner their hospitality to all
travellers, by calling to them, introducing them to their huts or the shade of their
trees, and giving them excellent melons, and the best fare they possess. Opposite
the town house, in the fields, is a conical mound of earth thirty feet in diameter, ten
feet high, with large peach trees on several places. At the lower end of the fields, on
the left bank of a fine little creek, Le-cau-suh, is a pretty little village of Coo-loo-me
people, finely situated on a rising ground; the land up this creek is waving pine
forest.*

The name of this town is wanting from the census rolls of 1832,
and there is little doubt that the tradition is correct which states
that it was one of those which went to Florida after the Creek war
of 1813.5 A part of the Kolomi people were already in that country;
since they are noted in papers of John Stuart, the British Indian agent,
dated 1778.° . According to a very old Creek Indian, now dead, Kolomi
decreased so much in numbers that it united with Fus-hatchee, and
Fus-hatchee decreased so much that it united with Atasi, with which
the town of Kan-hatki, to be mentioned below, also combined. But,
as we shall see, this can not have been altogether true, though it is an
undoubted fact that the towns mentioned were closely united in terms
of friendship. While Kolomi is still preserved as a war name very
few of the Creeks in Oklahoma remember it as a town.

1 Bartram, Travels, pp. 447-448. 5 See Gatschet in Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1,

2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, pp. 168-195. p. 401.
8 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262. 6 Copy of MS. in Lib Cong.

4 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., M1, pp. 33-34.

ARR:

REY

te Soe

AERA ARE Me HE ERLE,

thew vege,

emo tne

portals om

“
”

obey Rey 4 e

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 269

THe Fus-HATCHEE

The descriptive name of the Fus-hatchee and their intimate rela-
tions with Kolomi, Kan-hatki, and Atasi lead me to believe that they
were a comparatively late branch of one of these. They appear first
on the De Crenay map of 1733, in which they are placed on the south
side of the Tallapoosa.'!. They are also in the lists of 1738, 1750, 1760,
and 1761.2. James Germany was their trader in the last mentioned
year. In 1797 the trader was Nicholas White.*? The name is in the
lists of Bartram‘ and Hawkins,’ and is evidently the ‘‘Coosahatchies”’
of Swan.° In his list of Creek traders, made in May, 1797, Hawkins
assigns none to this town; but in a second, dated the following
September, he gives the name of William McCart, who had formerly
been a hireling of Abraham M. Mordecai at Hotiwahali.? Hawkins
describes the town as follows:

Foosce-hét-che; from foo-so-wau, a bird, and hot-che, tail.8 It is two miles below
Ho-ith-le-wau-le [Holiwahali] on the right bank of Tal-la-poo-sa, on a narrow strip of
flat land; the broken lands are just back of the town; the cornfields are on the oppo-
site side of the river, and are divided from those of Ho-ith-le-wau-le by a small creek,
Noo-coose-che-po. On the right bank of this little creek, half a mile from the river,
is the remains of a ditch which surrounded a fortification, and back of this for a mile
is the appearance of old settlements, and back of these, pine slashes.

The cornfields are narrow, and extend down, bordering on the river.®

This was one of those towns which went to Florida after the Creek-
American war, and consequently we find no mention of it in the
census list of 1832. A small band is noted in northern Florida
as early as 1778.1° It was accompanied by Kan-hatki, and after
the Seminole war the two moved westward together and formed a
single settlement in the southern part of the Seminole Nation. There
they constituted one district, known as Fus-hatchee, and were so rep-
resented in the Seminole council. Their square ground was, however,
known as Liwahali, because the leaders in forming it are said to have
been Hotiwahali Indians.

THe KAN-HATKI

The history of the Kan-hatki or Ikan-hatki (‘White ground”’) is
parallel with that of the Fus-hatchee. They appear on the De
Crenay map, in the lists of 1738, 1750, 1760, and 1761, and in those

1 Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.

*MSS., Ayer Lib.; Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 94; Ga. Col. Does., vm, p. 523.
8Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 168.

4 Bartram, Travels, p. 461.

§Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 25.

‘Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

7 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, pp. 168, 195.

8 This is erroneous. It should be fuswa, bird, and hatci, river or stream.
9Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 33.

10 Copy of MS. in Lib. Cong.

270 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

of Bartram, Swan, and Hawkins.! In 1761 their officially recognized
traders were Crook & Co. Swan gives Kan-hatki as one of two towns
occupied by Shawnee refugees, but this statement was probably due
to the presence of some Shawnee from the neighboring settlement
of Sawanogi. In September, 1797, Hawkins states that the trader
here was a man named Copinger.? He gives the following account
of the town:

E-cun-hut-ke; from e-cun-na, earth, and hut-ke, white, called by the traders
white ground. This little town is just below Coo-loo-me, on the same side of the
river, and five or six miles above Sam-bul-loh, a large fine creek which has its source
in the pine hills to the north and its whole course through broken pine hills. It
appears to be a never-failing stream, and fine for mills; the fields belonging to this
town are on both sides of the river.

In the census list of 1832 1s a town called ‘‘ Ekun-duts-ke,’’ which
may be intended for this, but we know that a large part of the Kan-
hatki went to Florida after 1813, and the name above given may
have belonged to an entirely different settlement, since it could be
translated ‘‘a section line” or ‘‘a boundary line.” The later his-
tory of the Kan-hatki is bound up with that-of the Fus-hatchee, to
which the reader is referred.

THe WIiwoHKA

According to tradition, Wiwohka was a made-up or “stray”
town, formed of fugitives from other settlements, or those who
found it pleasanter to live at some distance from the places of their
birth. One excellent informant stated that anciently it was called
Witumpka, but the names mean nearly the same thing, ‘roaring
water” and “tumbling water.’’ Both designations are said to have
arisen from the nature of the place of origin of these people, near
falls, and these may have been the falls of the Coosa. From the
preservation of a purely descriptive name and their comparatively
recent appearance in Creek history it may be fairly assumed that
they had not had a long existence. Their name appears on the De
Crenay map, in the lists of 1738, 1750, 1760, and 1761.4 It is wanting
from Bartram’s list, but reappears in those of Swan and Hawkins
and in the census rolls of 1832.5 The census of 1761 couples it with
“New Town,” and gives the traders as Wiliam Struthers and J.
Morgan.’ The irregular nature of its origin may perhaps be associ-
ated with its later responsibility for the Creek war of 1813 and the

1MSS., Ayer Lib.; Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190; Miss, Prov. Arch., 1, p. 94; Ga. Col. Docs., VI, p. 523;
Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schooleraft, Ind. Tribes, V, p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 25.

2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, pp. 168, 195.

3 Ibid., m1, p. 34. |

4 Plate 5; MSS., Ayer Lib.; Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 95; Ga. Col. Docs., vim, p. 523.

6 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 25; Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess.,

iv, pp. 282-283.
6 Ga. Col. Docs., op. cit.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 271

Green Peach war in Oklahoma, both of which are laid to its charge.
At the present. time it has so far died away that but few real Wi-
wohka Indians remain. Its later relations were closest with the
Okchai Indians with whom the survivors now busk.

The following is Hawkins’s description of this town as it was in
1799:

We-wo-cau; from we-wau, water, and wo-cau, barking or roaring, as the sound of
water at high falls. It lies on a creek of the same name, which joins Puc-cun-tal-lau-
has-see, on its left bank, sixteen miles below that town. We-wo-cau is fifteen miles!
above O-che-au-po-fau and four miles from Coosau, on the left side; the land is broken,
oak and hickory, with coarse gravel; the settlements are spread out, on several small
streams, for the advantage of the rich flats bordering on them and for their stock; they
have cattle, horses, and hogs. Here commences the moss, in the beds of the creeks,
which the cattle are very fond of; horses and cattle fatten very soon on it, with a little
salt; it is of quick growth, found only in the rocky beds of the creeks and rivers north
from this.

The hills which surround the town are stony, and unfit for culture; the streams all
have reed, and there are some fine licks near the town, where it is conjectured salt
might be made. The land on the right side of the creeks is poor, pine, barren hills
to the falls. The number of gun men is estimated at forty.”

THe KEALEDJI

According to native tradition this was a branch of Tukabahchee,
but, if so, it must have separated at a very early date. Gatschet
says that the name appears to refer to a warrior’s headdress, con-
taining the words ika, his head, and a verb meaning to kill (itéidshas,
I kill). This seems probable. At any rate the name evidently is not
old enough to be worn down much by age and suggests a compara-
tively recent origin for the group. This is also confirmed to a con-
siderable extent by the absence of its name from the earliest docu-
ments. Probably it is the “Gowalege”’ placed on a southern affluent
of the Ocmulgee on the Moll map of 1720,* and perhaps the “ Calalek”’
of the De Crenay map,’ since in the French census of 1760 we find a
town ‘ Kalalekis’’® which looks like a misprinted form of the name
of this town. In the Spanish list of Creek towns made up in 1738
the name is spelled “Caialeche”’ and in that of 1750 ‘ Kalechy.” 7
It is certainly the “Coillegees near Oakchoy”’ of the census of 1761,
the traders of which were Crook & Co’ In 1797 the traders were
John O'Riley, an Irishman, and Townlay Bruce, of Maryland,
formerly a clerk in the Indian Department, ‘‘removed for improper
conduct.’’® It is in the list of Bartram’ and in that of Swan," and is
thus described by Hawkins:

1 The Lib. Cong. MS. has “17.” 7MSS., Ayer Lib.

2 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, pp. 40-41. 8 Ga. Col. Docs., vil, p. 523.

3 Also on plate 3. 9 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 169.

4 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 133. 10 Bartram, Travels, p. 462.

6 Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190. 11 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, V, p. 262.

6 Miss. Prov. Arch.,1, p. 95.

972 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Ki-a-li-jee; on the right side of Kialijee Creek, two and a half miles below the junc-
tion with Hook-choie. This creek joins the right side of Tallapoosa, above the falls;
all the rich flats of the creek are settled; the land about the town is poor and broken;
the fields are on the narrow flats and in the bends of the creek; the broken land is
gravelly or stony; the range for cattle, hogs, and horses is the poorest in the nation;
the neighborhood of the town and the town itself has nothing to recommend it. The
timber is pine, oak, and small hickory; the creek is fifteen! feet wide, and joins Talla-
poosa fifteen! miles above Took-au-bat-che. They have two villages belonging to
this town.

Ist. Au-che-nau-hat-che; from au-che-nau, cedar; and hat-che, a creek. They have
a few settlements on this creek, and some fine, thriving peach trees; the land on the
creek is broken, but good.”

2d. Hat-che-chub-bau; from hat-che, a creek; and chub-bau, the middle, or halfway.
This is in the pine forest, a poor, ill-chosen site, and there are but a few people.*

The last-mentioned settlement and the main town were burned by
hostile Creeks in 1813. The name Kealedji occurs in the list of
1832.4 After their removal west these people settled in the south-
eastern part of the Creek Nation, where they still (1912) have a dance
ground but no regular square. .

Hatcheetcaba (Hatci teaba), the second village of Hawkins, appears
as far back as the census of 1760.° It is also in those of 1761,° and 1832,’
but not in the lists of Bartram and Swan. It preserved its identity
after removal to Oklahoma, where it maintained a dance ground,
but it is not certain that it ever had a regular square.

THE PAKANA

We now come to peoples incorporated in the Muskhogean confed-
eration which were probably distinct bodies and yet not certainly
possessed of a peculiar dialect like the Hitchiti, Alabama, and other
tribes of foreign origin already considered. The Pakana are given
by Adair as one of those people which the Muskogee had “artfully”
induced to incorporate with them, and he is confirmed as to the
main fact by Stiggins, whose account of them is as follows:

The Puccunnas at this day are only known by tradition to have been a distinct
people and their antient town or habitation is called Puccun Tal ahassee which is
Puccun old town. This antient town is in the present Coosa County of this State
[Alabama]. The Au-bih-kas have a tradition that they were a distinct people and
that they in old times were very numerous, but do not say whether they were immi-
grants or not, or at what time they became one of the national body. But they say
as they belonged to the national body one and inseparable there was no distinction
made so that by continual intermarriage with the other tribes they at length became
absorbed and assimilated with their neighbors without distinction and no other
knowledge is left regarding them but the name of their antient habitation. Whether
in conversation they had a separate tongue of their own or not tradition is silent.®

1 The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘‘ 20’? in each of these places.

3Tn his ‘‘ Letters’”’ he says this village consisted of ‘‘6 habitations and a small town house.’’—Ga. Hist.
Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 34.

Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, pp. 48-49.

4Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 327-330.

5 Miss. Prov. Arch.,1I, p. 95.

6 Ga. Col. Docs., Vm, p. 523.

7Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., lst sess., 1V, pp. 278-280.

8Stiggins, MS., p. 5.

PRP ee ee ee ea eee

wee nett ip Page ee ee Ge A

<6 ta (tere rr

ey r

‘1 4.
Apes

—

and

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 273
f

Not much can be added to this. There is a tradition among the
modern Creeks that the Pakana separated from the Abihka, but
it is evidently due to the proximity of the two peoples in ancient
times and the number of intermarriages which took place between
them. Again, an old Hilibi man told me that this town was founded
by a Wiogufki Indian named Bakna, who held the first busk in his
own yard, and whose name became attached to the new town. But
Pakana was in existence long before Wiogufki. Wakokai, the
mother town of Wiogufki, and the Pakana town were, however,
located near each other, and to the close relations thence arising we
may attribute the tradition. It is confusing to find the name Pakan
tallahassee [Pakan talahasi] (‘‘Pakana old town’’) used for these
people in the very earliest mention of them, the De Crenay map
of 1733.1 Since we hear shortly afterwards of a Pakana tribe—
distinct from the Pakan tallahassee, which first settled near Fort
Toulouse and later migrated to Louisiana—a suggestion is raised
whether the Pakan tallahassee may not have been Muskogee or other
Indians who had occupied a site abandoned by the Pakana proper.
We have something similar in the case of the Tukabahchee talla-
hassee, who were really an outsettlement of Okfuskee Indians.?
While such an interpretation is possible I think the real fact was
that a single tribe split in two after Fort Toulouse was established,
one part locating near it as a convenient market. At that time
the original body may have received the name “‘old town Pakana’”’
to distinguish them from the emigrants. It is indeed strange that
on the De Crenay map we find ‘‘old town Pakana”’ (Pakanatalaché),
but no Pakana.' Still, this is not conclusive, for Fort Toulouse
had probably been in existence 18 years when the map was prepared
and the Pakana in its neighborhood may well have been overlooked.
Both bodies appear in the lists of 1750, 1760,* and 1761, in which
last year William Struthers and J. Morgan were the officially recog-
nized traders.’ In 1797 the trader was ‘‘ John Proctor, a half-breed.’’>
The division known as Pakan tallahassee appears also in the list of
1738° and those of Bartram, Swan, and Hawkins, and on the
census rolls of 1832.7 In 1768, or shortly before, it was burned
by the Choctaw.’ Hawkins derives the name “from E-puc-
cun-nau, a may apple, and tal-lau-has-see, old town.” The first
word signifies properly ‘‘a peach’’—katabuya is May apple—but it

1 Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190. 7 Bartram, Travels, p. 461; Schoolcraft, Ind.
1See p. 247. Tribes, IV, p. 578; V, p. 262; Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls.,
§MSS., Ayer Lib.; Miss. Col. Arch., I, p. 95. I, p. 25; Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 2d sess.,
4 Ga. Col. Docs., Vim, p. 523. IV, pp 285-286.
§ Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 169. 8 Eng. Trans., MS., Lib. Cong.
6MS., Ayer Lib.

148061°—22——_18

274 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

is doubtful whether its original meaning was related to either.
The name Pakana may have a long antecedent history and a totally
different origin. Hawkins adds:

It is in the fork of a creek which gives name to the town; the creek joins on the
left side of Coosau, forty miles below Coo-sau town.!

After the removal they settled in the southern part of the Creek
Nation near Hanna, Oklahoma, and have maintained their square
ground in the same place ever since.

The Pakana who settled near Fort Toulouse probably never re-
joined their kindred. From a letter written by M. d’Abbadie,
governor of Louisiana, April 10, 1764, we know that they emigrated
to Red River at the same time as the Taensa and Apalachee.? He
calls them ‘‘Pakanas des Alibamons,” either from the name of the
French post or from the fact that they were supposed to be related
to the Alabama Indians. The former supposition is, I believe, cor-
rect, since in the census of 1760 we find them classed as ‘‘ Alybamons,”’
not merely with the Koasati and Tuskegee, but also with the Okchai,
some Coosa Indians, and some Indians called ‘‘Thomapas’’; while,
on the other hand, the Muklasa, Tawasa, and part of the Coosa are
put among the ‘“Talapouches,’ * Indians on Tallapoosa River.
Evidently the classification is geographical, not linguistic. Later
these Pakana settled upon Calcasieu River in southwestern Loui-
siana, as shown in the following account given by Sibley:

Pacanas, are a small tribe of about thirty men, who live on the Quelqueshoe [Cal-
casieu] River, which falls into the bay between Attakapa and Sabine, which heads
in a prairie, called Cooko prairie, about forty miles southwest of Natchitoches. These
people are likewise emigrants from West Florida, about forty yearsago. Their village
is about fifty miles southeast of the Conchattas; are said to be increasing a little in
number; quiet, peaceable, and friendly people. Their own language differs from
any other, but speak Mobilian. 4

Still later some or all of these Pakana united with the Alabama
living in Texas, where they are still remembered. The last sur-
vivor was an old woman who died many years ago. Her language
was said to be distinct from Alabama, which would naturally be the
case if it was Muskogee.

THe OKCHAI

Like the Pakana, Adair includes the Okchai among those tribes
which had been ‘“‘artfully decoyed” to unite with the Muskogee,®
and Milfort says that the Okchai and Tuskegee had sought the pro-
tection of the Muskogee after having suffered severely at the hands of
hostile Indians. He adds that the former ‘‘mounted ten leagues toward

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 41. 4Sibley in Annals of Congress, 9th Cong., 2d
2 Amer. Antiq., XIII, pp. 252-253. sess., 1086 (1806-07).
8 Miss. Prov. Arch. I, p. 94. 6 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS OTT

the north [of the confluence of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers] and
fixed their dwelling in a beautiful plain on the bank of a little river.’’ 4
Among some of the living Okchai there seems to be a tradition of
this foreign origin, but nowhere do we find evidence that they spoke
a diverse language. Their tongue may have been a dialect of Mus-
kogee assimilated to the current speech in very ancient times.

This tribe appears on some of the earliest maps which locate
Creek towns, such as that of Popple.? Their original seats were, as
described by Milfort, on the western side of the Coosa some miles
above its junction with the Tallapoosa. By 1738, however, a part of
them had left that region and moved over upon a branch of Kialaga
Creek, an affluent of the Tallapoosa.* Another portion evidently
remained for a time near their old country, since the census of 1761
mentions ‘‘Oakchoys opposite the said [i. e., the French] fort.” 4

After the cession of Mobile and its dependencies to Great Britain
these probably reunited with the main body. Okchai are indeed
afterwards spoken of in the neighborhood of the old fort, but they
appear to have been in reality Okchaiutci, part of the Alabama,
whose history has been given elsewhere.® The last were probably
those “‘Okchai’’ who accompanied the Koasati to the Tombigbee
shortly after 1763.°

The Okchai proper are not noted by Bartram except under the
general term ‘‘ Fish Pond” Indians,’ but appear in the lists of Swan §
and Hawkins® and in the census rolls of 1832.1° Hawkins has the
following description:

Hook-choie; on a creek of that name which joins on the left side of Ki-a-li-jee,
three miles below the town and seven miles south of Thlo-tlo-gul-gau. The settle-
ments extend along the creeks; on the margins of which and the hill sides are good
oak and hickory, with coarse gravel, all surrounded with pine forest.!!

After the emigration they established their square ground on
the southern border of the Creek Nation, where it has remained
ever since.

A small band isrecorded among the Seminoles of northern Florida
in 1778.”

Besides Okchaiutci, which was not properly a branch at all,
several settlements were given out by this town. The most prom-
inent and probably the most ancient of these was Lalogalga (‘“ Fish
Place”’), from which the traders’ name of ‘Fish Pond” is derived.

1 Milfort, Mémoire, p. 267. 8 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

2 Plate 4. § Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., m, p. 25.

3MS., Ayer Lib. 10Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp.
4 Ga. Col. Docs., m1, pp. 521-523. 297-298.

6 See pp. 200-201. 11 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., tn, p. 37.

6 See p. 203. 12 Copy of MS. in Lib. Cong.

7 Bartram, Travels, p. 462.

276 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

“Wish Pond” occurs first in Bartram,! but it was often applied
to the Okchai Indians generally, and Latogalga appears first as a
distinct settlement in Swan’s list, 1791.2. Hawkins (1799) describes
it thus:

Thlot-lo-gul-gau; from thlot-lo, fish; and ulgau, all; called by the traders fishponds.
It is on a small pond-like creek, a branch of Ul-kau-hat-che, which joins Tallapoosa
four miles above Oc-fus-kee, on the right side. The town is fourteen miles up the
creek; the land about it isopen and waving; the soil is dark and gravelly; the general
growth of trees is the small hickory; they have reed in the branches.

Hannah Hale resides here. She was taken prisoner from Georgia when about
eleven or twelve years old, and married the head man of this town, by whom she
has five children. This woman spins and weaves, and has taught two of her daughters
to spin; she has labored under many difficulties, yet by her industry has acquired
some property. She has one negro boy, a horse or two, sixty cattle, and some hogs;
she received the friendly attention of the agent for Indian affairs as soon as he came
into the nation. He furnished her with a wheel, loom, and cards; she has an orchard
of peach and apple trees. Having made her election at the national council in 1799
to reside in the nation, the agent appointed Hopoithle Haujo to look out for a suitable
place for her, to help her to remove to it with her stock, and take care that she receives
no insults from the Indians.*

In 1796 the traders stationed there were “John Shirley and Isaac
Thomas, the first an American, the latter of German parents.’ 4

Evidently this is one of the two Fish Pond towns mentioned in
the census list of 1832.5 There is a square ground of the name in
Oklahoma at the present time, but those who formed it were not direct
descendants of the people who formed the old Lalogalga town.
When the removal took place all of the Okchai Indians came together
and established one square ground near the present Hanna, Okla.
Later, as the result of a fission in the tribe brought about by
the Civil War, part moved away and settled near Okemah some-
time after 1870. There they revived the old term Lalogalga, which
they have since employed.

Asilanabi was founded later than the first Latogaiga and was so
named because it was first located in a place where /lex vomitoria
was to be gathered. We do not find the name in print until we come
to the census rolls of 1832.5 There is a square ground in Oklahoma
so called, but, as in the case of Lalogalga, it has no historical con-
tinuity with the older settlement. It is the result of a later fission.

The Okchai living in Oklahoma claim that Potcas hatchee (Hatchet
Creek) was a former settlement of theirs which was ‘‘lost.”’” It was
in existence in Hawkins’s time and appears in the census list of
1832.6 The following is Hawkins’s description of it:

Po-chuse-hat-che; from po-chu-so-wau, a hatchet, and hat-che, a creek. This
creek joins Coosau, four miles below Puc-cun-tal-lau-has-see, on its right bank; this

1 Bartram, Travels, p. 462. 5 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., IV, pp.
2 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262. 297-298.
3 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, pp. 49-50; 1x, p. 170. 6 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 50; Senate Doce. 512,

4 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 34. 23d Cong., 1st sess., IV, pp. 284-285.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS OTT

village is high up the creek, nearly forty miles from its mouth, on a flat bend on the
right side of the creek; the settlements extend up and down the creek for a mile.
A mile and a half above the settlements there is a large canebrake, three-quarters of
a mile through and three or four miles in length.

The land adjoining the settlement is waving and rich, with oak, hickory, and poplar.
The branches all have reed; the neighboring lands above these settlements are fine;
those below are high, broken hills. Itis situated between Hill-au-bee and Woc-co-coie,
about ten miles from each town; three miles west of the town there is a small moun-
tain; they have some hogs.!

Probably the remnants of this town finally reunited with the main
body. Two other ‘“‘lost” settlements are also remembered—Talsa
hatchi (Tulsa Creek) and Tcahki lako (broad shallow ford). This
last, however, may have been the Okfuskee village of that name, at
one time on Chattahoochee River.?

Tue TUKABAHCHEE

Tukabahchee was not only considered one of the four “foundation
sticks” of the Creek Confederacy, but as the leading town among
the Upper Creeks, and many add the leading town of the whole
nation. During later historic times it was the most populous of all
the upper towns, and is to-day the most populous without any ex-
ception. Like the other head towns, it has a special ceremonial
title, Spokogi, or Ispokogi. Jackson Lewis thought this meant
that Tukabahchee brooded over the other towns like a hen over her
chickens. Another old Creek was of the opinion that it meant “to
hold something firmly,’’ since it was this town that held the con-
_ federacy together. Gatschet interprets it as ‘‘town of survivors,’’
or ‘“‘surviving town, remnant of a town.’’* It can not be said,
however, that any of the suggested interpretations has great prob-
ability in its favor. As some early writers give the second conso-
nant as ¢ instead of k, the initial word in the name may have been
tutka, fire. The original Spokogi were supposed to be certain beings
who descended from the upper world to the Tukabahchee and brought
them their medicine. From the intimacy which long subsisted be-
tween the Tukabahchee and Shawnee I am inclined to think that
the resemblance between this word and that of one of the Shawnee
bands, Kispokotha, or Kispogogi, is more than accidental.

It would certainly be a shock to almost any Creek to be toid that
this reputed capital of the confederacy, from which, according to
some of them, the busk ceremonial was derived, was not originally
a true Muskogee town at all. This, however, is the conclusion to
which we are brought by a study of the facts concerning its early

1 Ga. Hist. Soc.-Colls., m1, pp. 50-51. 3 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 148.

2 See p. 249.

278 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

history. It is the statement of Milfort, who probably derived his
information from Alexander McGillivray, and who says:

About the same time [as that in which the Muskogee and Alabama finally made
peace with each other] an Indian tribe which was on the point of being destroyed
by the Iroquois and the Hurons, came to ask the protection of the Moskoquis, whom
I will now call Crécks. The latter received them among themselves and assigned
them a region in the center of the nation. They built a town, which is now rather
large, which is named Tuket-Batchet, from the name of the Indian tribe. ~The
great assemblies of the Créck Nation, of which it forms an integral part, are sometimes
held within its walls.!

Alone this would not amount to proof, Milfort not being the most °
trustworthy authority, but Adair confirms it in the one important
point. He quotes a Tukabahchee Indian of his time named “Old
Bracket’’ to the effect that the people of this town ‘‘were a different
people from the Creeks.”’? Their origin myth also appears to have
varied considerably from that of the Creeks proper. This appears
from some confused notes furnished by Gatschet,? but still more from
the following legend preserved in the Tuggle collection, though that
differs not so much in general plan as in the line of march, south
instead of east.

The Took-a-batchees say that a long time ago their people had a great trouble and
moved away. They came to water they could not cross. They built boats and
crossed the water and marched south. They decided their course of march by a
pole. They stood the pole perpendicularly and let it fall and in whatever direction
it fell they marched in that direction. This pole was entrusted to a prophet. They
continued marching south until the pole would not fall in any definite direction, but
would wabble as it fell. Here they stopped and lived a long time. After a while
another great trouble came and they resumed their march until they came to water,
which was too wide to cross in boats, so they marched along the coast. They followed
their pole going east till they came to Georgia, where they lived when the white
people came to America.

A difference is possibly indicated in the claim made by the
Tukabahchee that they are ‘‘a stray’’ (town). This is explained,
however, on the ground that they could do as they pleased, and
this again may have been on acccunt of their superiority. They
were also called Italwa fatca, ‘‘town deviating from strictness,”
a title said to have been shared by the Abihka.*

The migration legend just quoted is borne out in this particular,
that when the Spaniards first heard of the Tukabahchee they appear
to have been in Georgia, but it is improbable that they reached that
country by marching along the coast. The earliest notice I have
of them is in a letter of Antonio Mateos, lieutenant of the Apalachee
province, of May 19, 1686, already several times mentioned, in

1 Milfort, Mémoire, pp. 265-266. 3 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 147.
3 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 179. 4Tbid., p. 148.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 279

which he says that Indians reported the English to have visited
“the province of Ticopache.’”' From the description it would
appear that Coweta lay between this ‘‘province” and Carolina. In
1695, in retaliation for attacks upon the Apalachee, an expedition
consisting of 400 Apalachee Indians and 7 Spaniards visited the
towns of Coweta, Kasihta, Oconee, and Tukabahchee (‘‘Tiqui-
pache”’). In one—the narrative does not say which—they cap-
tured 50 persons, but they found the other places burned and aban-
doned.?, The Oconee were on the Oconee River at this time and
the Coweta and Kasihta on the Ocmulgee, so that it seems probable
the Tukabahchee were then in the same general region. They
perhaps removed as a result of the attack. Tukabahchee Talla-
- hassee, noticed above as an Okfuskee town and located on the upper
course of Tallapoosa River,’ was probably so named because it
occupied a site formerly held by the Tukabahchee, and it is likely
that this was after their removal from Georgia.

It is to be noted that in most Tukabahchee traditions the Shawnee
play a leading part, and Gatschet says that some Tukabahchee
claimed they were Shawnee. This statement may, however, be
accounted for by the metaphorical term employed to designate
certam Tukabahchee clans. This association and their tradition
of a northern origin lead to the suggestion that the Tukabahchee
may have been those mysterious Kaskinampo discussed elsewhere
who in the seventeenth century are frequently connected with the
Shawnee Indians.‘

In the South Carolina records under date of 1712 mention is made
of two “Tukabugga” slaves.» The Tukabahchee appear among
the Upper Creeks, but at an indeterminate place, on the De Crenay
map of 1733.° Here the word is spelled ‘‘Totipaches,” in the list
of 1738 ‘‘Tiquipaxche,” in that of 1750 ‘‘Totipache,”’ and on the
census list of 1760 ‘‘Totepaches.”? In 1761 James McQueen and
T. Perryman were officially recognized traders at this town, ‘‘includ-
ing Pea Creek and other Plantations, Chactaw Hatchee Euchees, &e.’’®
In 1797 the traders there were Christopher Heickle, a German, and
Obadiah Lowe.? Bartram!? and Swan"! mention it, and Hawkins
gives the following description of the town as it existed in 1799:

Took-au-bat-che. The ancient name of this town is Is-po-co-gee; its derivation
uncertain; it is situated on the right bank of the Tallapoosa, opposite the junction of

1 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 195. ® Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190.

2 Tbid., p. 225. 7MSS., Ayer Lib,; Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 95.
3 See p. 247. Cf. ‘““‘Tukabatchee old Fields,’’ of 8 Ga. Col. Docs., vim, p. 523.

plate 8. 8 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., 1x, p. 168.
4 See pp. 213-214. 10 Bartram, Travels, p. 461.

6 Proc. of Board Dealing with Ind. Trade, p. 59, +4! Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.
MS.

280 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLE.738 |

Eu-fau-be, two and a half miles below the falls of the river, on a beautiful level. The
course of the river from the falls to the town is south; it then turns east three-quarters
of a mile, and short round a point opposite Eu-fau-be, thence west and west-by-north
to its confluence with Coosau, about thirty miles. It is one hundred! yards wide
opposite the town house to the south, and here are two good fords during the summer,”
one just below the point of a small island, the other one hundred yards still lower.

The water of the falls, after tumbling over a bed of rock for half a mile, is forced
into two channels; one thirty, the other fifteen feet wide. The fall is forty feet in
fifty yards. The channel on the right side, which is the widest, falls nearly twenty ~
feet in ten feet. The fish are obstructed here in their attempts to ascend the river.
From appearances, they might be easily taken in the season of the ascending the
rivers, but no attempts have hitherto been made to do so.

The rock is a light gray, very much divided in square blocks of. various sizes for
building. It requires very little labor to reduce it to form, for plain walls. Large
_ Inasses of it are so nicely fitted, and so regular, as to imitate the wall of an ancient .
building, where the stone had passed through the hands of a mason. The quantity
of this description at the falls and in the hill sides adjoining them, is great; sufficient
for the building of a large city.

The falls above spread out, and the river widens to half a mile within that distance.
and continues that width for four miles. Within this scope are four islands, which
were formerly cultivated, but are now old fields margined with cane. The bed of the
river is here rocky, shoally, and covered with moss. It is frequented in summer by
cattle, horses, and deer; and in the winter, by swans, geese, and ducks.

On the right bank opposite the falls, the land is broken, stony, and gravelly. The
hill sides fronting the river, exhibit this building rock. The timber is post oak,
hickory, and pine, all small. From the hills the land spreads off level. The narrow
flat margin between the hills and the river is convenient for a canal for mills on an
extensive scale, and to supply a large extent of flat land around the town with water.
Below the falls a small distance, there is a spring and branch, and within five hundred
yards a small creek; thence within half a mile the land becomes level and spreads
out on this side two miles, including the flats of Wol-lau-hat-che, a creek ten feet wide
which rises seventeen miles from its junction with the river, in the high pine forest,
and running south-southeast enters the river three miles below the town house.
The whole of this flat, between the creek and the river, bordering on the town, is
covered with oak and the small hard shelled hickory. The trees are all small; the
land is light, and fine for corn, cotton, or melons. The creek has a little cane on its
margins and reed on the small branches; but the range is much exhausted by the stock
of the town.

On the left bank of the river, at the falls, the land is broken pine forest. Half a
mile below there is a small creek which has its source seven miles from the river, its
margins covered with reed or cane. Below the creek the land becomes flat, and con-
tinues so to Talesee on the Eu-fau-bee, and half a mile still lower, to the hills between
this creek and Ca-le-be-hat-che. The hills extend nearly two miles, are intersected
by one small creek and two branches, and terminate on the river in two high bluffs;
from whence is an extensive view of the town, the river, the flat lands on the opposite
shore, and the range of hills to the northwest; near one of the bluffs there is a fine spring,
and near it a beautiful elevated situation for a settlement. The hills are bounded to
the west by a small branch. Below this, the flat land spreads out for one mile. It
is a quarter of a mile from the branch on this flat to the residence of Mr. Cornelis (Oche

4 The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘1207’.
2 The town house was opposite the mouth of the Eu-fau-be.—Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., rx, p. 38.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 281

Haujo [Hickory Hadjo]), thence half a mile to the public establishment, thence two
miles to the mouth of Ca-le-be-hat-che. This creek has its source thirty miles to the
east in waving, post oak, hickory, and pine land; in some places the swamp is wide,
the beach and white oak large, with poplar, cypressyred bay, sassafras, Florida mag-
nolia, and white pine. Broken piny woods and reedy branches on its right side, oak
flats, red and post oak, willow leaved hickory, long and short leaf pine, and reedy
branches on its left side. The creek at its mouth is twenty-five feet wide. The
flat between it and the river is fine for corn, cotton, and melons, oak, hickory, and short-
leaf pine. From this flat to its source, it is margined with cane, reed, and palmetto.
Ten miles up the creek, between it and Kebihatche, the next creek below and parallel
with this, are some licks in post and red oak saplin flats; the range on these creeks is
apparently fine for cattle; yet from the want of salt or moss, the large ones appear poor
in the fall, while other cattle, where moss is to be had, or they are regularly salted, are
fat.

They have 116 gun men belonging to this town; they were formerly more numerous,
but they have been unfortunate in their wars. In the last they had with the Chicka-
saws they lost thirty-five gun men; they have begun to settle out in villages for the
conveniency of stock raising and having firewood; the stock which frequent the mossy
shoals above the town, look well and appear healthy; the Indians begin to be atten-
tive to them, and are increasing them by all the means in their power. Several of
them have from fifty to one hundred, and the town furnished seventy good beef
cattle in 1799. One chief, Toolk-au-bat-che Haujo [Tukaba‘tci Hadjo], has five hun-
dred, and although apparently very indigent, he never sells any: while he seems to
deny himself the comforts of life, he gives continued proofs of unbounded hospitality ;
he seldom kills less than two large beeves a fortnight for his friends and acquaintances.

The town is on the decline. Its appearance proves the inattention of the inhab-
itants. It is badly fenced; thay have but a few plum trees and several clumps of
cassine yupon; the land is much exhausted with continued culture, and the wood
for fuel is at a great and inconvenient distance, unless boats or land carriages were in
use, it could then be easily supplied; the river is navigable for boats drawing two and
a half feet in the dry season from just above the town to Alabama. From the point
just above the town to the falls, the river spreads over a bed of flat rock in several
places, where the depth of water is something less than two feet.

This is the residence of Efau Haujo [Dog Hadjo], one of the great medal chiefs, the
speaker for the nation at the national council. He is one of the best informed men
of the land, faithful to his national engagements. He has five black slaves and a stock
of cattle and horses; but they are of little use to him; the ancient habits instilled in
him by French and British agents, that the red chiefs are to live on presents from their
white friends, is so rivited, that he claims it as a tribute due to him, and one that never
must be dispensed with.

At the public establishment there is a smith’s shop, a dwelling house and kitchen
built of logs, and a field well fenced. And it is in the contemplation of the agent
to have a public garden and nursery.

The assistant and interpreter, Mr. [Alexander] Cornells (Oche Haujo [Hickory
Hadjo]), one of the chiefs of the Creek Nation, has a farm well fenced and cultivated
with the plough. Heisa half-breed, of astrong mind, and fulfills the duties enjoined
on him by his appointment, with zeal and fidelity. He has nine negroes under
good government. Some of his family have good farms, and one of them, Zachariah
McGive is a careful, snug farmer, has good fences, a fine young orchard, and a stock
of hogs, horses, and cattle. His wife has the neatness and economy of a white
woman. This family and Sullivan’s, in the neighborhood, are spinning.!

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, pp. 27-31.

989 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Hawkins mentions a village belonging to Tukabahchee called
Wehuarthly [Wi hiti] (sweet water) from a little creek of that name
near which it stood.'

Tecumseh held most of his councils with the Creeks in this town.
The name appears in the census of 1832? and often in later history.
After the removal the Tukabahchee settled in the southeastern corner
of their new territory, but later drifted westward, following the game,
and at the present time their square ground is just north of Holden-
ville. This is still the most populous town in the nation and has the
largest square.

OtrHEeR MuskoGrErE Towns AND VILLAGES

Besides the recognized tribes or towns of major importance and
such of their offshoots as can be identified, the literature of this
region contains many names of towns or villages which can not be
definitely connected with any of those given. In some cases it may
be that we have to deal with ancient divisions in process of decline
which were never connected with the rest, but in at least nine-tenths
of the cases they are nothing more than temporary offshoots of the
larger bodies.

Opiltako (“Big Swamp”) seems to have been one of the most
ancient and important of these. It appears as far back as 1733, on
the De Crenay map.’ It appears also in the census lists of 1750
and 1760,‘ but not in that of 1761. The trader located there in 1797
was Hendrik Dargin.® Swan spells the name ‘“ Pinclatchas,”’ * and
Hawkins has the following description:

O-pil-thluc-co; from O-pil-lo-wau, a swamp; and chloe. big. It is situated on
a creek of that name, which joins Puc-cun-tal-lau-has-see on the left side. It is 20
miles from Coosau River; the land about this village is round, flat hills, thickets of
hickory saplings, and on the hillsides and their tops, hickory grub and grapevines.
The land bordering on the creek is rich, and here are their fields.’

The town does not appear in the census list of 1832, and seems to
have vanished out of the memories of the living Indians. By his ©
classification of Opillako, Hawkins clearly indicates that he con-
sidered it a branch of one of the other towns. It is probably the
Weypulco of the Mitchell map (pl. 6).

Hawkins thus describes another branch village:

Pin-e-hoo-te; from pin-e-wau [pinwa], a turkey, and ehoo-te [huti], house. It is on
the right side of a fine little creek, a branch of E-pe-sau-gee. The land is stiff and

1 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., rx, p. 46. 4MS., Ayer Lib.; Miss. Prov. Arch., I. p. 95.
2Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 243- 5 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., Ix, p. 170.
252. 6 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

3 Plate 5; also Hamilton, Col. Mobile, p. 190. 7 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 50.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 2983

rich, and lies well; the timber is red oak and hickory, the branches all have reed,
and the land on them, above the settlement, is good black oak, sapling, and hickory.
This and the neighboring land is fine for settlement; they have here three or four
houses only, some peach trees and hogs, and their fields are fenced. The path from
New-yau-cau to Cow-e-tuh-tal-lau-has-see passes by these houses. !

Another town of the same name was in Bibb County, Alabama,
east of Cahaba River, opposite the mouth of Shuts Creek.?

There is very muck less information regarding the other villages,
and I will arrange them alphabetically with the few facts we have
concerning them appended:

AcPACTANICHE. A town in the De l’Isle map of 1703, located on the headwaters
of Coosa River. The name may be intended for that of the Pakana.

ALKEHATCHEE or ALKOHATCHI. De Brahm, writing in the eighteenth century, gave
this as the name of an Upper Creek town.* It perhaps refers to Latogalga on Elk-
hatchee Creek.

ArcHasApa. Given on the Purcell map (pl. 7) as a town on Tallapoosa River not
far below Tulsa. It may be intended for Hatcheechubba, but if so, it is not properly
located. |

AucHEucauta. Royce * gives this as a town in the northwestern part of Coosa
County, Alabama. The first part of the name is probably atcina, cedar. It is
evidently the Cedar Creek Village of Owen ° and may be the Authinohatche of the
Popple map (pl. 4).

Avnosa. Swan has this in his list of Creek towns immediately after Autauga.®
It is possible that it was merely a synonym of Autauga.

Breep Camp. The census of 1761 mentions this, but states that it was already
said to be broken up.’ See, however, note 1 on page 418.

CauwaAouLav. Given by Brannon as a Lower Creek village in Russell County,
Alabama, ‘“‘west of Uchee P. O., south of the old Federal road.’

CHACHANE. A town which appears in the Spanish enumeration of 1738 placed
among the Lower Creek towns, farther downstream than any other except Old
Tamati. It is mentioned in some other Spanish documents.®

CHANAHUNREGE. On the Popple map (pl. 4). Perhaps the Clamahumgey of
Taitt (see p. 418).

CHANANAGI (“‘Long ridge”). A Creek town which Brannon places ‘‘in Bullock
County, just south of the Central of Georgia Railroad, near Suspension.’’® Wood-
ward represents the people of this‘town as being allied with the Tukabahchee when
the Creek-American war broke out. There is a modern village of this name east of
Montgomery, in Russell County, Alabama.

CuIcHOUFKEE. ‘‘An Upper Creek town, in Elmore County, east of Coosa River,
and near Wiwoka Creek.”’ 1° *

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 50.

2 Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 50.

3 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 182 [214]; Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 391.

4Wighteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., map of Alabama.

6 Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 43.

6 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

7 Ga. Col. Docs., vm, p. 523.

8 MSS., Ayer Lib.

§ Jefferys, French Dom., 1, p. 134, map, 1761; Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 44; Woodward
Reminiscences, p. 37.

10 Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 44.

284 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

CHINNABY’S Fort. In 1813 a Creek chief named Chinnaby, friendly to the
Americans, had a kind of fort at Ten Islands, on the Coosa River, known as Chinnaby’s
fort. Perhaps it was identical with Oti palin (q. v.).

CHISCALAGE. On the Popple map (pl. 4).

CHoxocco LitanrxEE. Brannon? locates this in the Horseshoe Bend of Tallapoosa
River, the scene of Jackson’s famous victory. The first word is from Itcu ako, horse.

CuuaHta. ‘An early Indian town, location not positive, just below White Oak
Creek, south of the Alabama River.’’ ?

Cora. On the Popple map (pl. 4); perhaps another form of ‘‘Coosa.”’

Conatcuie. Given by Royce as a town in the southwestern part of Talladega
County, Alabama, on the bank of Coosa River. If correctly transcribed the name
may mean ‘‘Cane River.”’ *

ConALIGA. Woodward mentions an Upper Creek town of this name. It is said to
have been ‘‘in western Russell County, or eastern Macon, somewhere near the present
Warrior Stand.”’ *.

CooccoHaPore. Site of an old town, apparently on Chattahoochee River. It
stood on the right bank and the fields were cultivated on the left bank.°

CoTOHAUTUSTENUGGEE. Royce ® gives this as a Lower Creek settlement on the
right bank of Upatoie Creek, in Muscogee County, Georgia. The last part is tastanagi,
‘“‘warrior,’’ and the whole is evidently a man’s name. ad

Cow Towns. Finnelson speaks of towns so called.’

DonnaLLY’s Town. Milton * mentions this as a settlement on Flint River, Georgia,
in 1793. The trader Panton calls it “‘ Patrick Donnelly’s Town on the Chatehoochie,”’
and says it was burned by horsemen from Georgia, September 21, 1793, 6 Indians being
killed and 11 taken prisoner.’

EKUN-pDUTS-KE. Given in the census enumeration of 1832.!° Ikan tatska means
“boundary line” and hence this may be identical with “Line Creek Village,” said
to have been on the south bank of Line Creek, in Montgomery County, Alabama.
This town may have been on a boundary line between two others."

Emarue or HeEMANHIE Town. This is given in the census of 1832." It was prob-
ably named for a man (Imahe).

Ero-HUSSE-WAKKES (Itahasiwaki) (‘“‘Old Log”). Young mentions it as a Lower
Creek town on the Chattahoochee River, 3 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia, having
100 inhabitants in 1820.'%

Fire’s Vittace. Given by Royce as an Upper Creek village a few miles east of
Talladega, Alabama.'*

Fin’Hatut (‘High Log”).!5 A Lower Creek settlement, perhaps the Yuchi town
called High Log which appears in the census list of 1832.'° There is a swamp of this
name in Wayne County, Georgia.

1 Gatschet in Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 395, quoting Drake, Book of Indians (1848), Iv, p. 55.
2 Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 44. ,

3 Royce in Eighteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pl. cvm, 1899.

4 Woodward, Reminiscences, p. 37, 1859; Handbook Ala. Anth. Soe. for 1920, p. 45.
6 Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1x, p. 173.

6 Thirteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., map of Alabama.

7 Amer. State Papers, Ind. Aff., I, p. 289.

8 [bid., , p. 372.

9 Copy of MS in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib., Chicago, vols. on Indian Trade, 0, p. 35.
10 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 319-320.

11 See p. 270; Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 48.

12 Senate Doe. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 301-302.

13 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 364.

4 Royce in Eighteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pl. CvIl, 1899.

15 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., I, p. 130.

16 Senate Doc. 512; 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 359-363.

SWANTON] EARLY: HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 285

HasiquacHe. On the Popple map (pl. 4).

Ikan atoHaKA, ‘‘Holy Ground,” a temporary settlement on the south side of
Alabama River, occupied by the Creek leaders, Weatherford and Hilis hadjo, during
the Creek-American war, until it was destroyed, December 23, 1813. It is said to
have contained 200 houses at the time. Brannon locates it in Lowndes County 24
miles due north of White Hall, just below the mouth of Holy Ground Creek on Old
Sprott Plantation.!

IsrapoGa (‘‘ Where people live’). Gatschet gives this as an Upper Creek settle-
ment, and Brannon says it was “in Talladega County, near the influx of Estaboga
Creek into Choccolocco Creek; about 10 miles from the Coosa River.’’ There is a
modern place so called in Talladega County, Alabama.’

Kenatcues. On the Popple map (pl. 4).

Kerorr. Given in H. R. Ex. Doc. 276, 24th Cong., Ist sess., p. 162, 1836, as a
Creek settlement, apparently on the upper Coosa.

Lrraratcui, Lirrerutcn1. The name is said by Gatschet to refer to the manu-
facture of arrows, li.* This was an Upper Creek town at the head of Canoe Creek,
St. Clair County, Alabama. It was burned by Colonel Dyer October 29, 1813.4 It
was probably the same as, or on the same site as, the Olitifar mentioned in the Pardo
narratives, although Olitifar was a ‘‘destroyed town” when Pardo heard of it.®

LustuHATCHEE. A town above the second cataract of the Tallapoosa River;
lustu, perhaps from ldsti, black, hatchee, river.

MeEutTon’s VitnAce. ‘“‘An Upper Creek town, in Marshall County, aati, on
Town Creek, at the site of the present ‘Old Village Ford.’ Meltonsville perpetuates
the name.”’ ®

NINNIPASKULGEE. Woodward’ mentions a band of Upper Creek Indians of this
name. They seem to have been located near Tukabahchee.

Nrexy. McCall* mentions this. It would appear to have been a Lower Creek
town.

OAKCHINAWA VILLAGE (okchan, ‘‘salt”). Given by Owen as an Upper Creek town
“Tn Talladega County, on both sides of Salt Creek, near the point where it flows into
Big Shoal Creek.”’ ° There may have been some connection between this town and
the Creek Oktcanalgi or Salt Clan.

Otp OsonEE Town. Given by Royce asa village probably belonging to the Upper
Creeks, on Cahawba River, in Shelby County, Alabama.'°

Orr Pain (‘Ten islands”). A town on the west bank of Coosa River, just below
the junction of Canoe Creek. Fort Strother was just below.!!_ See Chinnaby’s Fort.

Orr Turctina (‘‘Oteetoocheenas, Three Islands”). Swan gives this in his list of
Creek towns.’? It seems to have been between Coosa and Opillako or Pakan Talla-
hassee, and the name probably referred to three islands in Coosa River.

Pea Creek. A settlement mentioned along with Tukabahchee in the census of
1761.13 It may have been an outsettlement of Tukabahchee.

1 Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 46.

2 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg.,1, p. 133; Misc. Coll. Ala. Hist. Soc.,1, p. 399; Handbook Ala. Anth. Soe. for
1920, p. 47.

3 Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 403.

4 Pickett, Hist. Ala., m1, p. 294.

§ Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, p. 485. See plate 8.

6 Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 48.

7 Woodward, Reminiscenses, p. 37, 1859.

8 Hist. Ga., 1, p. 367.

® Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 49.

10 Eighteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pl. cvim.

1 Gatschet in Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 407.

1 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

13 Ga. Col. Does., vill, p. 523.

286 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Rassirt Town. Given as an Upper Creek town in the census enumeration of 1832.1
As the rabbit is always a subject for jest among the Creeks it was suggested to me that
this may have been nothing more than a nickname.

Sararo. In the report by Vandera of Pardo’s expedition into the interior this
appears as a settlement, probably Creek, on Tennessee River.”

SecHARLECHA (‘‘Under a blackjack tree’’). A Lower Creek settlement mentioned
frequently in early documents, probably a branch of Kasihta.

Sr. Tarrery’s. Given in the Ga. Col. Docs. as a small Creek town.* -

Tawa HADJO (‘‘Crazy Town’). An Upper Creek town on Cahawba River, far to
the northwest of the other Creek towns.*

TauipsenoGcy (‘Two talewa plants standing together,’ the talewa being used in
making dyes). This appears in the census enumeration of 1832 and also in School-
craft.°

TALISHATCHIE Town. ‘‘An Upper Creek town, in Calhoun County, Alabama,
east of a branch of Tallasehatchee Creek, 3 miles southwest of Jacksonville.’ ®

TaLLAPpoosa. Several early maps give a town of this name, and Adair in one place,
and only one, refers to a ‘‘Tallapoose town” within a day’s journey of Fort Toulouse.’
It is possible that it was an Alabama town, for the name is either Alabama or Choctaw,
and the town may have given its name to the river. It seems to mean “pulverized
stones,” or ‘‘sand.’’ In some maps this town seems to be placed on the Coosa (see
pl. 4).

Tcuuxko 4AKO (‘‘Big house,’’ i. e., squareground). Gatschet has mistakenly entered
two towns of this name in one of his lists of Creek towns. The proper name of each
of these is Peahki tako, ‘‘ Big ford.”

Tonowoctiy. Given along with Coweta as a Lower Creek town 8 to 10 miles below
the falls of the Chattahoochee.® Perhaps it is intended for Sawokli.

TuRKEY CREEK. ‘An Indian town, in Jefferson County, on Turkey Creek, north
of Trussville.’’!° This was in territory dominated by the Creek Indians and hence
was probably settled by people of that nation.

Uncuauta. An Upper Creek town in the western part of Coosa County, on Coosa
River.

WaiHaL. On the Purcell map (pl. 7). The name may be intended for Eufaula,
or this may have been a settlement on Wallahatchee Creek, Elmore County, Alabama.

Weyouia. On the Popple map (pl. 4) and some later maps; probably a very
much distorted form of the name of some well-known town.

TH COUCH

Our history of those tribes constituting the Creek Confederacy will
not be complete without some mention of three alien peoples which
were incorporated with it at a comparatively recent period. ‘These
are the Yuchi, the Natchez, and the Shawnee.

The Yuchi have attracted considerable attention owing to the fact
that they were one of the very few small groups in the eastern part

1 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 313-315,

2 Ruidiaz, La Florida, u, p. 484.

3 Ga. Col. Docs., Vu, p. 427.

4 Gatschet in Mise. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 410.

5 Senate Doe. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, p. 334; Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, rv, p. 578.
6 Handbook Ala. Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 51.

7 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 242.

8 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg., 1, p. 146; Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 411.
9 De Brahm, Hist. Prov. of Ga., p. 54.
10 Handbook Ala, Anth. Soc. for 1920, p. 52.
ll Royce in Highteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer, Ethn., pl. Cv.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS > OST.

of North America having an independent stock language. Their
isolation in this respect, added to the absence of a migration legend
among them and their own claims, have led to a belief that they were
the most ancient inhabitants of the extreme southeastern parts of the
present United States. The conclusion was natural, almost inevi-
table, but the event proves how little the most plausible theory may
amount to in the absence of adequate information. Strong evidence
has now come to light that these people, far from being aboriginal
inhabitants of the country later associated with them, had occupied
it within the historic period.

Dr. F. G. Speck has contributed to the study of southern tribes
an invaluable paper on “The Ethnology of the Yuchi Indians,” !
but he made no special investigation into their history from documen-
tary sources. However, he noted an apparent absence of Yuchi
names—with one possible exception—in the narratives of the De
Soto expedition, and particularly called attention to the non-Yuchean
character of the name of Cofitachequi, which up to that time had
generally been considered a Yuchi town.? I have touched upon this
particular point more at length insanother place.’

One reason for the general misunderstanding of the place of the
Yuchi in aboriginal American history was the fact that the language
was generally considered very difficult by other peoples and few
learned it, and, although not necessarily resulting from that circum-
stance, it so happened that they were known to different tribes by dif-
ferent names, never apparently by the term Tsoyaha, ‘‘ Offspring of the
sun,’ which they apply to themselves. Regarding the name Yuchi,
Speck says:

It is presumably a demonstrative signifying ‘‘ being far away” or “‘at a distance”

_ in reference to human beings in a state of settlement (yu, ‘“‘at a distance,” tci, “sitting

down’’).

It is possible, in attempting an explanation of the origin of the name, that the
reply “‘ Ywtct” was given by some Indian of the tribe in answer to a stranger’s in-
quiry, ‘‘Where do you come from?’’ which is a common mode of salutation in the
southeast. The reply may then have been mistaken for a tribal name and retained as
such. Similar instances of mistaken analogy have occurred at various times in con-
nection with the Indians of this continent, and as the Yuchi interpreters themselves
favor this explanation it has seemed advisable at least to make note of it.*

I can add nothing except to say that the Creeks have no explana-
tion of the name to offer, and that it appears rather late, little if any
before the opening of the eighteenth century. In the South Caro-
lina archives reference is made to “‘the Uche or Round Town people,”
but the second term is probably not intended as a translation of the
first.°

1 Univ. of Penn., Anth. Pub., 1, no. 1. 4 Speck, op. cit., p. 13.
2Tbid., p. 7. & Proc. Board of Comm. dealing with Ind. Trade,

3 See pp. 216-217. MS., p. 34.

288 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Gatschet gives Tahogaléwi as the Delaware equivalent of Yuchi,!
and from early maps, where it appears in the forms Tahogale, Taho-
garia, Taogria, Tongaria, Tohogalegas, etc., it is evident that it was
applied by other Algonquian peoples also. It was used most per-
sistently for a band of Yuchi on Tennessee River, but on the maps
of Moll and some other cartographers the Tahogale are placed along
Savannah River—a fact which serves to confirm the identification
of the term (see pl. 3).

Tohogalega was sometimes abbreviated to Hogologe or Hog
Logee. A legend on a map in Jefferys’s Atlas at a point on Savan-
nah River several miles above Augusta reads: ‘‘Hughchees or
Hogoleges Old Town deserted in 1715,” ? and an island in the river
at this point is called ‘‘Huhgchee I.” The form Hughchee is some-
what unusual, but is confirmed as actually intended for Yuchi by
numerous references to this island as ‘‘Uchee Island” in the Georgia
Colonial Documents and elswehere, as well as the existence of a
“Uchee Creek” which flows into the Savannah at this point.

The earliest historical name for the Yuchi was Chiska or Chisca.
I assert this confidently on the basis of information contained in
very early Spanish documents, both published and unpublished, and
on the very strongest. of circumstantial evidence, although as yet
no categorical statement of the identity has been found. The cir-
cumstantial evidence is as follows: First, the term Chiska occurs in
the same list, or on the same map, as the term Yuchi very rarely, and
then when we know, or have good reason to believe, that more than
one band of Yuchi were in the region covered. Secondly, the Span-
iards, who use it principally, apply the term not to an obscure tribe
but to a powerful people, and they mention in the same connection
all of the leading tribes of the Southeast with the conspicuous excep-
tion of the Yuchi. Thirdly, the term occurs persistently in three
different areas, in the region of the Upper Tennessee, on the Savan-
nah,’ and near the Choctawhatchee, where we know on independent
evidence that just so many Yuchi bands had settled.

Some time ago I attempted a further identification of this tribe
with a people settled upon the Savannah River at the time when
South Carolina was colonized by the whites, and called by the latter
Westo.t Prof. Verner W. Crane, who has made some important

1 Gatschet, Creek Mig. Leg.,1, p. 19.

3 Jefferys’s Am. Atlas, map 24.

3 There is but one application to Savannah River, it is true, but this is of considerableimportance as
tending tosettlean otherwise puzzling problem. Itis in the version of the Creek migration legend given
by Hawkins in which his native informant says that after they had crossed what is now the Chattahoochee
River the Creeks spread out eastward to the Ocmulgee, Oconee, and Ogechee Rivers, and to ‘‘Chis-ke-tol-
lo-fau-hatche” (‘‘Chiska town river’’). In the published version (Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., tm, p. 83) this is
spelled ‘ Chic-ko-tallo-fau-hat-che,’’ but the original in the Library of Congress has it in the form just given.

4See article ‘‘Westo” in Handbook of American Indians, Bull. 30, Bur. Amer. Ethn., part 2. I did
not, however, make an elaborate exposition of my views at the time when this article was written.

ee eae ae aed Oe eee Orn ee

4
<
: 4
>

EE a Se eee

sWanton] © EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 289

historical discoveries in this region, to be mentioned presently, has,
however, taken strong exception to it. The resulting discussion
between Professor Crane and myself has appeared in the American
Anthropologist, which the reader may consult,! but it will not be
profitable to cover the same ground again. I will merely incorpo-
rate a short statement of my present views on the subject and the
reasons which lead me still to adhere to my original opinion.

My studies of southeastern tribes have clearly demonstrated that
the Yuchi once inhabited some territory in the neighborhood of the
southern Appalachian Mountains, from which a large part of them
moved during the seventeenth and the early part of the eighteenth
centuries, invading the low countries to the south of them and settling
in several different places. Two or three such waves of migration
can be made out with certainty, the first resulting in a settlement on
Choctawhatchee River, in the western part of the present State of
Florida; a second giving birth to the Yuchi settlement on Savananh
River above the site of the present Augusta, later removed to the
Chattahoochee River and then to the Tallapoosa; and a third,
probably subsequent to the Yamasee war, which brought about a
Yuchean colonization of the lower Savannah, and later became con-
solidated into the well-known Yuchi town among the Lower Creeks.
Furthermore, distinct names are often applied to these several bands,
and sometimes they appear upon the same map under the distinct
names. ‘The first name appears in history as “Chisca,” but later
we find them called, successively, Hogologe and Yuchi; the second
are called both Hogologe and Yuchi; while the last appears as
Yuchi almost invariably. On numerous maps we find the Hogologe
(or Hogolege) and Yuchi entered as if they were distinct tribes, and
Romans includes the two in his enumeration of the principal Lower
Creek towns.”

So far as the Yuchi are concerned, then, the concurrent use of two
or more distinct names does not prove that the people so called were.
unrelated. There can be no question that the Westo constituted
for a long period a body of Indians distinct from those just men-
tioned. They were not a part of the same tribal organization. The
question is, Were they or were they not a Yuchean tribe? Did they
speak a Yuchean dialect?

In the first place, attention should be called to the fact that in
the immediate neighborhood of the southern Appalachians the

-Yuchi are the only people known to have moved southward in any

considerable numbers in the early historic period. Again, after
the Yamassee war and the later removal of those people to whom
1 Amer. Anthrop, n. s. vol. XX, pp. 331-337; vol. XxX1, pp. 213-216, 463-465.
3 Plates 4 and 6; Romans, Con. Nat. Hist. E. and W. Fla., p. 280.
148061 °—22——_19

290 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the term Yuchi is commonly applied to the Chattahoochee River,
the Yuchi and Westo towns were established a very few miles apart,
where the two may readily have united. It is evident that a suffi-
ciently large body of Westo Indians continued to exist in this neigh-
borhood to have attracted the attention of those traders and explor-
ers from whom accounts have come down to us if they were as dif-
ferent from the Creeks generally as there is every reason to believe,
unless they were confused with another people which did attract
such attention. And it is a matter of record that practically all
earlher writers upon the Lower Creeks make particular mention of
the Yuchi and comment upon their distinct language and peculiar
customs.

In his last communication Professor Crane cites a new piece of
evidence which he thinks renders it necessary for us to reject the
Yuchean connection of the Westo. ‘This is the reference in Wood-
ward’s Westo Narrative! to a report brought by two Shawnee Indians
to the effect that “ ye Cussetaws, Checsaws, and Chiskers were intended
to come downe and fight ye Westoes.” If the Chiska and Westo
were both Yuchi, Professor Crane argues that they would not be fight-
ing each other. This, however, by no means follows. Many instances
may be cited of tribes related by language at bitter enmity with
one another and allied on each side with peoples having no connec-
tion with them whatever. Besides, Woodward says regarding these
Shawnee, ‘“‘There was none here yt understood them, but by signes
they intreated freindship of ye Westoes showeing,’ and so on as
above. One may well hesitate to place entire confidence in infor-
mation obtained in this manner.

On the other hand, there is one bit of documentary evidence which
tends to identify the Indians under discussion with the Chiska. This
is given on page 296, and it will not be necessary to quote it at length,
but the gist of it is that about 1682 La Salle encountered some
- Indians called ‘‘Cisca” and learned that the Indians of ‘ English
Florida” had burned one of their villages, “aided by the English,”
after which they had abandoned thew easternmost villages and
moved into the neighborhood of La Salle’s fort. Now, English
Florida must certainly refer to Carolina, not Virginia, and the Caro-
lina settlers engaged in no war of consequence up to that time—
certainly none resulting in the expulsion of a tribe—except that
against the Westo, who had been driven out the year before.

As opposed to the Yuchean theory, Professor Crane can only sug-
gest a possible Iroquoian connection for these otherwise enigmatic
Westo, and he has but two direct arguments to offer, both of the
slenderest. One of these is the superficial resemblance between the

1 See pp. 306-307.

rea)

OSPR Be eae Ee A he Lh rns ETS

SDL OANA SERIO SN oN «gts aoe

ee ale

ld
f
=%
&
toy
*
-~
rd
7
a

rar

“Sed

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 291

name Rickohockans, which, as we shall presently see, he identifies
with the Westo, and the native name of the old Erie tribe
Riquehronnons; the other an excerpt from the South Carolina
archives to be noted presently.!. Regarding the first point it is to be
remarked that Mr. J. N. B. Hewitt, who has a profound knowledge
of the languages of the Five Nations and a very considerable
knowledge of Algonquian, considers the resemblance only super-
ficial and the former word plainly Algonquian. His researches also
indicate another direction of migration for the defeated Erie.

The excerpt referred to is a commentary appended to the South
Carolina Commons House address of 1693 mentioned above to the effect
that “the Mawhawkes are a numerous, warlike nation of Indians, and
strictly aleyd to the Westos. . . .’! As Professor Crane says,
“much depends on the interpretation of the expression ‘strictly aleyd’”’;
but I believe that the adverb would hardly have been used if the
connection between the Mohawk and Westo were merely linguistic.
While that might have been intended as one of the bonds between
them, some kind of political or military coordination appears to be
hinted at also, and this was extremely improbable between sworn foes
like the Erie and Iroquois, while, on the other hand, we know that the
Iroquois and Yuchi were both bitter enemies of the eastern Siouan
tribes.

My conclusion is that, in the present state of this question, the
Yuchean connection of the Westo has greater probability in its
favor than any other theory, and I shall treat their history along with
that of the better identified Yuchean bands, leaving the reader to draw
his own conclusions from the material available, all of which will be
presented.

On taking this position, however, we are immediately confronted
by a further identification, mentioned above, between the Westo and
the Rickohockans or Rechahecrians, a mysterious tribe which appears

in early Virginia history. Professor Crane, to whom we owe this

identification, bases it on material contained in the colonial archives
of the State of South Carolina, which is as follows. On January 13,
1693, the upper house of the colony of South Carolina laid before the
commons house of Assembly information to the effect that some
northern Indians had come to establish themselves among the Tus-
kegee, and others were coming the summer following to settle among
the Coweta and Kasihta. Thereply of the lower house, drawn up by a
committee of which James Moore, a leading Indian trader, was chair-
man, declared ‘‘ that all possible means be used to prevent the settlem*
of any Northern nation of Indians amongst our Friends, more Espe-

1 Crane in Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol. XX, pp. 336-337.

292 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

cially ye Rickohogo’s or Westos, a people which formerly when well
used made anattempt to Destroyus. . . .’ And Professor Crane
welladds: ‘The ‘Hickauhaugau’ of Woodward’s relation was, then,
simply a variant of ‘Rickohogo’ or Rickahockan.’”’' This identifica-
tion appears to me satisfactory and very illuminating. It is to be ob-
served, too, that the mountain habitat of these Rickohockans falls
very near to, if it is not identical with, the habitat of the northern
band of Chiska to be described presently. As the name Ricko-
hockan seems, fide Hewitt, to be an Algonquian term signifying “cave-
landers,” we must not lose sight of the possibility that it may have
been applied to more than one people, and that they were identical,
at least in part, with the Westo of South Carolina history. Singu-
larly enough Professor Crane, even in this identification, is confronted
by the same difficulty which we note so frequently in dealing with
the Yuchi—the application of synonymous terms to different bands.
Thus Lederer meets in one town Rickohockans whose home was “not
far westward of the Apalataean mountains” and later hears of the
“Oustack,” a fierce tribe at war with the Catawba.? These Oustack
must certainly have been the Westo then living in the same region
and known by aname almost identical, allowing for an ending which
we may reasonably attribute to Lederer’s Algonquian interpreter.

Still one more term may prove to have been applied to these peo-
ple of many names, the term Tamahita. A full statement of the ar-
guments in this case has already been given.’ Let us now take up the
history of these various Yuchi, or supposedly Yuchi, bands.

As I have already explained, there is no evidence that the Yuchi
were on Savannah River in De Soto’s time. In fact, there is no
proof that he himself met them at all. When he was passing down
the Tennessee River, however, he heard of them under the name
‘“‘Chisca,”’ the “province” so called lying across the mountains to the
north. They were evidently in the rough country in the eastern part
of the present State of Tennessee,tand De Soto sent two soldiers to
visit them. The Fidalgo of Elvas says:

In three days [after the arrival of the expedition at Coste] they that went to Chisca got
back, and related that they had been taken through a country so scant of maize, and
with such high mountains, that it was impossible the army should march in that
direction; and finding the distance was becoming long, and that they should be back
late, upon consultation they agreed to return, coming from a poor little town where
there was nothing of value, bringing a cow-hide as delicate as a calfskin the people

had given them, the hair being like the soft wool on the cross of the merino with the
common sheep.®
Se Ee ee ee ee eee ee ee
1 Crane, op. cit., p. 336.
2 Lederer, in Alvord and Bidgood, First Exp. Trans-Allegheny Region, pp. 135-171.
3 Pp. 188-191.
4 Mr. William E. Myer, who for years has made a careful study of the archeology of Tennessee, believes
that these Chiska were at the ‘‘stone fort’’ near Manchester, the county seat of Coffee County, Tennessee.
6 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, pp. 79-80,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 293

Ranjel says simply that the messengers “ brought good news,’’!
and Garcilasso speaks as if they actually reached the province they
were in search of.?_ On account of some slip in the memories of the
latter’s informants he applies the name Chisca to a town near the
Mississippi which the other chroniclers call Quizquiz, or Quizqui.
~Biedma makes no mention either of the province or the expedition.
It will be noticed that Elvas says nothing of any metal seen by the

explorers. Garcilasso, on the other hand, states that they “reported

that the mines were of a very highly colored copper”’.t| The success
of the expedition as reported by Garcilasso and Ranjel and this
mention of copper mines accord ill with what Elvas says. Js it
possible that some facts regarding the expedition were kept secret
within official circles, but leaked out into the camp through the
messengers? After the explorers had crossed the: Mississippi Elvas
tells us they ‘‘marched in quest of a province called Pacaha, which
he had been informed was nigh Chisca,”’® and, after he had arrived
at the former place, he sent out an expedition to see if they could
turn back toward the latter.° It is possible that they had learned of
another band of Yuchi who are known to have been living near the
Mussel Shoals about 1700 (pl. 3).

The next we hear of this province is in the Pardo narratives. In
November, 1566, as we have seen, Juan Pardo left the new port of
Santa Elena and marched northward to the province of Juada, proba-
bly the country of the Siouan Cheraw. There he built a fort, which he
left in charge of a sergeant named Moyano (or Boyano). The follow-
ing January (1567), after Pardo’s return to Santa Elena, a letter
reached him from Moyano informing him that his sergeant had been
at war with a chief named ‘‘Chisca,”’ that with 15 soldiers he had
killed over 1,000 Indians and burned 50 huts. Later Moyano re-
ceived a threatening letter from one of the mountain chiefs (un ¢a-
cique de la sierra), perhaps from this same Chisca—at any rate from
one of his allies. Determined to be the first to attack, Moyano
went out from the fort of San Juan with twenty soldiers, marched four days through the
sierra, and reached the enemies one morning and found them so well fortified that it
was a marvel, because they were surrounded with a very high wooden wall and having
a small gate with its defences; and the sergeant seeing that there was no way to enter
but by the gate, made a shelter by means of which they entered with great danger,
because they wounded the sergeant in the mouth and nine other soldiers in different
places, but none of them dangerously. When they finally gained the fort the Indians
took refuge in the huts which they had inside, which were underground, from which
they came out to skirmish with the Spaniards, and [the latter] killing many of the
Indians, fastened the doors of the said huts and set fire to them and burned them all,
so that there were killed and burned 1,500 Indians.?

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, m1, p. 110. 4 Thid., p. 372.
____Garcilasso in Shipp, De Soto and Fla., pp. 5 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, J, p. 117.
372-373. 6 Thid., p. 128.

3Ibid., p. 404 et seq. 7 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 0, pp. 477-480.

994 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

In contemplating this feat of Moyano’s I can not help repeating
Lowery’s reference to a Spanish proverb, ‘Distant countries, big
tales.”’? It is sad to relate that the hero of the expedition was after-
wards cut off, along with all of the force accompanying him except
one man, by a comparatively insignificant tribe near Port Royal
And yet it is possible that Moyano’s narrative is true if he was accom-
panied by a large body of friendly Indians not mentioned in the text.

Later the Chiska chief, in alliance with those of ‘‘Carrosa, Costehe, |
and Coza,’’ was reported to be lying in wait with several thousand
Indians, intending to attack Pardo, and this was why Pardo turned
back to Santa Elena from his second expedition that same year
(1567)? : ;

As we shall presently see, the Yuchi later came to be called Chichi-
mecs by the Spaniards through a fancied resemblance in character
to the wild tribes north of Mexico. A reference to ‘‘Chichimecas”’
far to the north of Florida in a Spanish document dating from the
last quarter of the sixteenth century may possibly have reference to
the tribe we are discussing.*

The course of Yuchi history now separates into several distinct chan-
nels, corresponding to a similar division among the people themselves,
A portion of them remained in the north, a second body settled not
far from Choctawhatchee River in western Florida, and two or three
others established themselves on and near the Savannah River.
Each will be considered in turn, beginning with that band mentioned
first, which remained nearest to the original Yuchi home.

In 1656, if we accept Professor Crane’s identification and my
own inferences from it, the Yuchi made a sudden and spectacular ap-
pearance on and disappearance from the stage of Virginia history.
John Burk has the following account of it:

Whilst the assembly were employed in these wise and benevolent projects, infor-
mation was received that a body of inland or mountain Indians, to the number of six
or seven hundred, had seated themselves near the falls of James River, apparently
with the intention of forming a regular settlement. Some movements were at this
time noticed among the neighboring tribes which seemed to indicate something
like a concert and correspondence with these strangers; and the minds of the colonists,
always alive to, and apprehensive of, Indian treachery, were unusually agitated on
this occasion. The place these Indians had made choice of was another source of
disquiet. It was strong and difficult of access, alike calculated for offensive and
defensive operations; and they recollected the immense trouble and expence that
had been incurred in extirpating the tribes which formerly dwelt in that place. At
the conclusion of the last peace with the Indians this station was considered so impor-
tant, that its cession was insisted on, as the main pledge and security of peace; and
it had hitherto continued unoccupied as a sort of barrier to the frontiers in that direc-
tion. Under all these circumstances they could not see it, without anxiety, occupied

1 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 147. 3 Lowery, MSS.
* Ruidiaz, op. cit., p. 471.

SWANTON) EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 295

by a powerful band of hardy warriors, who perhaps were only the advance guard of a
- more formidable and extensive emigration.

The measures of the assembly in removing this ground of alarm, were prompt and
vigorous. One hundred men were dispatched under the command of Edward Hill,
to dislodge the intruders. His instructions were to use peaceable means only, unless
compelled by necessity; and to require the assistance of all the neighboring Indians,
according to the articles of the late treaty. The governor was at the same time directed
to send an account of this invasion to Totopotomoi [principal chief of the Pamun-
key Indians}, and desire that his influence should be exerted in procuring the imme-
diate cooperation of the friendly tribes.

It is difficult to form any satisfactory conjecture as to the motives of this extraor-
dinary movement directly against the stream and tide of emigration. It was cer-
tainly a bold step to descend into the plain, in the face of an enemy, whose power
they must have heard of, and which could scarcely fail of inspiring astonishment and
awe; and to take the place of warlike tribes, whom the skill and destructive weapons
of the whites had lately exterminated and swept away.

The scanty materials which the state records have preserved of Indian affairs
throw little light on this subject. But though they do not present this people in all
the various relations of peace and war, we generally see them in one point of view at
least; and are often able by induction, to supply a considerable range of incident and
reflection. In the second session of [the] assembly, Colonel Edward Hill was cash-
iered, and declared incapable of holding any office, civil or military, within the colony,
for improper conduct in his expedition against the Rechahecrians. We are not told
whether the offence of Hill was cowardice or a wilful disobedienee of the instructions
he had received. There is however reason to believe that he was defeated, and that
the Rechahecrians maintained themselves in their position at the falls by force; for
the governor and council were directed by the assembly to make a peace with this
people, and they farther directed that the monies which were expended for this pur-
’ pose should be levied on the proper estate of Hill.

From other sources almost equally authentic we learn that the aid demanded of
the Indians was granted without hesitation. Totopotomoi marched at the head of an
hundred warriors of the tribe of Pamunkey and fell with the greater part of his fol-
lowers, gallantly fighting in this obstinate and bloody encounter.'

The site of this battle was at the falls of the James. It is evident
that we have here the migration of a tribe, and hence the probability
that this settlement was occupied by Yuchi rather than Cherokee
becomes so much the stronger. Why the newcomers disappeared
after having won a decisive victory over both whites and Indians,
and made a treaty of peace by which their right to inhabit part of
the country must have been recognized, isa mystery. The historians
appear to be silent both as to the time and the manner of their going.
The chances are that, having been forced or induced to abandon their
original seats, they had small attachment to any new spot and were
easily prevailed upon to establish themselves elsewhere. Perhaps
reports filtering back to them from their kinsmen in the south led
them to believe that there they should find an easier existence or less
hostile neighbors. On the other hand, they may merely have returned

1 Burk, Hist. of Va., 1, pp. 104-107.

296 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

into the interior, for we know that there were Yuchi in Tennessee
until a comparatively late period, but among the Florida records is
one which points to a new influx of Yuchi into the south shortly
after the date of the great battle on the James. This will be con-
sidered presently.

Whether these latter Indians were Rickohockans or not, there were
Rickohockans still in the north. In 1670, during his second expedi-
tion into the province of Carolina, Lederer was informed by several
Indians ‘‘that the nation of Rickohockans, who dwell not far to the
westward of the Apalataean Mountains, are seated upon a land, as
they term it, of great waves,” from which Lederer infers that they
meant the seashore. It is more likely, as Mooney suggests, that
they had reference to the mountains.” A tragedy of which Ricko-
hockans were the victims was witnessed by Lederer at the town of
Occaneechee. He says:

The next day after my arrival at Akenatzy, a Rickohockan ambassadour, attended
by five Indians, whose faces were coloured with auripigmentum (in which mineral
these parts do much abound), was received and that night invited to a ball of their
fashion; but in the height of their mirth and dancing, by a smoke contrived for that
purpose, the room was suddenly darkened and, for what cause I know not, the Ricko-
hockan and his retinue barbarously murthered.?

The next reference to the northern Yuchi is in a document printed
in the Margery collection under the heading “‘ Riviéres et Peuplades
des Pays Découverts,”’ apparently written by La Salle shortly after
his descent of the Mississippi in 1682. Unfortunately the first part
is wanting. The fragment preserved begins by speaking of some
people who were ‘“‘neighbors of the Cisca and their allies as well as
the Cicaca.’’* On the next page, in speaking of the upper Ohio
region, he says: ;

The Apalatchites, people of English Florida, are not far from some one of its most
eastern branches, because they have war with the Tchataké [Cherokee] and the
Cisca, one of whose villages they burned, aided by the English. The Ciscas then
abandoned their former villages, which were much further to the east than those
from which they have come here.’’®

In a letter written to M. de La Barre somewhat later La Salle
refers to the Illinois, Shawnee, and ‘‘Cisca’”’ whom he had assembled
about Fort St. Louis, near the present Utica, Illmois.* It is also
possible that they are the Chaskpe mentioned in another piace in
connection with the Shawnee and “Oabano,”’’ but still more probable
that the Chaskpe (or Cheskape) were a part of the Shawnee, since
they appear on early maps farther north than the Chiska, near the
Cumberland.

1 Alvord and Bidgood, First Expl. Trans-Alle- 4 Margry, Déc., 0, p. 196.
gheny Region, p. 155. 5 Tbid., p. 197.

2 Nineteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p.183. 6 Tbid., p. 318.

3 Alvord and Bidgood, op. cit., pp. 155-156. 7 Tbid., p. 314,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 297

Probably these Yuchi did not remain long at La Salle’s fort, but
from this time on the tribe appears on numerous maps under several
variants of its Algonquian name—Tahogalegas, Taogaria, Tongeria,
Taharea. Covens and Mortier place it on the south side of the
Ohio just above its junction with the Wabash. Coxe gives it as one
of four small tribes located on an island of the same name in Ten-
nessee River.' Sauvole in a letter of 1701 mentions it, though the
name has been misprinted ‘‘Coongalees.”’? Coxe and most of the
remaining authorities represent the tribe as located lower down the
Tennessee than any others except the Chickasaw, who at that time
had a settlement a few leagues above its mouth. In the fall of the
year 1700 Father Gravier, of the Society of Jesus, descended the
Mississippi to the newly established French post in Louisiana, and
some distance below the mouth of the Ohio he encounted ‘‘a pirogue
of Taédgria.”” He has the following to say regarding this adventure:

These belong to the loup nation, and carry on a considerable trade with the English.
There were only 6 men in it [the pirogue] with a woman and a child; they were coming
from the Akansea. He who seemed the most notable among them could speak a few
words of Illinois and spoke the Chaouanoua tongue. He made me sit in front of his
traveling cabin, and offered me some sagamité to eat. He afterward told me, as news,
that Father de Limoges (whom he called Captain Pauiongha) had upset while in his
canoe, and had lost everything; and that the Kappa akansea had supplied him with
provisions and a canoe, to continue his voyage. I gave him a knife and half a box of
vermilion; he made me a present of a very large piece of meat, the produce of his
nunting.®

Gravier naturally classified these people with the Algonquians,

since they were able to speak the language of their neighbors, the

Shawnee, and had themselves an adopted Algonquian name.

Five Canadians who reached South Carolina via the Tennessee
River in the summer of 1701 found this town above a town of the
Chickasaw and below that of the Tali. They estimated the number
of their men at ‘‘about 200.’* It is probable that soon after this
time the Yuchi moved higher up the Tennessee, for the next we hear
of them they were living close to the Cherokee country. Through
the South Carolina archives we learn that they had a town there
named Chestowee or Chestowa. This is a Cherokee word which
Mooney spells Tsistu’yl, and interprets ‘‘ Rabbit place.’’®> May 14,1712,
the South Carolina board dealing with Indian trade was informed
that a band of ‘‘ Uche or Round Town people” were on the point of
abandoning their town, and this is probably the band intended.® We
learn from the same source that in 1714 this town was “cut off” by

1 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1856, p. 230. 5 Nineteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p.
2 Ibid., 1851, p. 238. 538.
3 Jes. Rel., Thwaites ed., pp. 65, 115. 6 Proc. Board Dealing with Indian Trade, MS.,

4MS., Lib. La. Hist. Soc.; Correspondence Géné- pp, 34.
tale, pp. 403-404.

298 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the Cherokee in retaliation for the murder of a Cherokee Indian.!
The documents add that the murder had been committed at the
instigation of some English traders. The tradition of the event
remained in the country for a long time, as is evident by the following
statements of Ramsey. In recounting the various tribes which
formerly inhabited Tennessee he says:

A small tribe of Uchees once occupied the country near the mouth of Hiwassee.
Their warriors were exterminated in a desperate battle with the Cherokees.”

In another place he adds that this conflict occurred at ‘‘ the Uchee~
Old Fields, in what is now Rhea County.” The site is now in Meigs
County.’ He also says that the survivors were compelled to retreat
to Florida, where they became incorporated with the Seminole, but
he has evidently brought together two widely separated fragments of
Yuchi history. It is apparent that the extermination was not as
complete as he represents, nor did the whole tribe leave the country.
Mr. Mooney quotes testimony from a Cherokee mixed blood named
Gansé’‘ ti, or Rattling-gourd, who was born on Hiwassee River in
1820 and went west with his people in 1838, to the effect that ‘‘a
number of Yuchi lived, before the removal, scattered among the
Cherokee near the present Cleveland, Tenn., and on Chickamauga,
Cohutta, and Pinelog Creeks in the adjacent section of Georgia.
They had no separate settlements, but spoke their own language,
which he described as ‘hard and grunting.’ Some of them spoke
also Cherokee and Creek.’’* As the existence of the northern
band of Yuchi was not suspected when Mr. Mooney penned the above
he naturally assumed that they had drifted north from the Creek ©
country before a boundary had been fixed between the tribes. It is
now apparent that they were descendants of the Yuchi whose history
we have been tracing. On Mitchell’s map (pl. 6) and several others
we find ‘‘Chestoi O. T.”’ (i. e., Chestowee old town) laid down upon
the Hiwassee a short distance above its mouth. After the removal
some of these Yuchi probably reunited with the main part of their
tribe in the Creek Nation; a few are said to be still living in Tennessee, °
and there is a modern town named ‘‘Kuchee”’ on Tennessee River,
near the northern end of Meigs County.

Before taking up the largest Yuchi divisions, those on Savannah
River, it will be convenient to consider the third branch of the tribe,
since it did not have the permanency of the Savannah bands, and
historical information regarding it goes back to an earlier date. This
third branch was located when we first learn of it in what is now the
State of Florida, a short distance west of the Choctawhatchee River,
for which reason the people are called Choctawhatchee Yuchi.

1 Proc. Board Dealing with Indian Trade, MS., 3 Ibid., p. 84.
p. 87. 4Ninetecenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p.385.
2 Ramsey, Annals of Tenn., p. 81. 5 Information, from T. Michelson.

we fe a

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 999

The following probably refers specifically to the band under con-
sideration. It is part of a letter written from St. Augustine, August
22, 1639, to the court by Gov. Damian de la Vega Castro y Pardo
about various matters connected with the administration of his
province.

A number of Indians called Ysicas or Chiscas, a warlike people and who take pride
in this fact, roam through those provinces, free, originating from New Mexico. I
have tried to gather them, and get them away from the trails, assigning to them a
place where they could settle, ten leagues from this garrison beyond a river called Rio
Blanco, near another village of Catholics. It seemed to me that taking them off the
trails they could no longer molest the Christian Indians, but would spread out and
multiply, making a livelihood by hunting and trying to work and cultivate the ground
with the end of making of them vassals of your Majesty and converting them. Having
them close by and under supervision it would be easy to punish any excesses and they
could be used in helping to search for fugitive Indians, who run away from their doc-
trinas, which is causing great damage, for the reason that, running away this way loose,
they join bands of heathens and may apostatize. Furthermore these Ysicas are friends
of the Spaniards, courageous, and ready to go against any enemies. These Indians
are good by land and by water, as well as several other tribes wha have come to yield
their obedience to your Majesty two hundred leagues from here. . . '

These Yuchi are again mentioned in connection with the irruption
of a new horde of ‘‘barbarians”’ from the north to be described pres-
ently. They are represented as perpetual trouble makers for the
Spaniards, and in 1674 three of them threatened to interfere with the
labors of the missionaries among the Chatot. They are accused of
complicity in the outbreak in that tribe one year later, being de-
scribed as ‘‘a rebellious people, mountaineers (montaras), reared in
license without the control of culture or other conventions, attentive
solely to game, which is their means of livelihood and with which
those lands abound.”’ ?

Their meddlesome propensities brought on a war with the Apalachee
Indians in 1677, of which the following is an account. It is contained
in a letter written to the King of Spain by Goy. D. Pablo de Hita
Salazar, and is dated St. Augustine, November 10, 1678.

Report given to Captain Juan Fernandez de Florencia by the principal military
chiefs who made war on the Chisca Indians and whose names are: Juan Mendoza,
Matheo Chuba, the Cacique of Cupayca, Bernardo and Ventura de Ynija,* of San
Luis. This report tells how the war against the Chiscas originated, which is in the fol-
lowing way: Many years ago those Indians used to come on the trails. It was not
quite certain whether they were Chiscas or Chichutecas, but they would assault and
kill the Christians or would carry them off, men, women, and children, and make
slaves of them. Not until last year, which was 1676, did it become clear that they

were Chiscas by the deaths they caused at Huistachuco; and by the killing among the
Chines at Chachariz and at Cupayca we knew they were Chiscas, and although it is

1 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., p. 199. Translated by Mrs. F. Bandelier.

2 Lowery, MSS.

3TIn reality Ynija is probably a native word identical with the Creek heniha. The heniha wasan
assistant to a chief or other leading officer.

300 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

true that they went immediately in pursuit they could never catch them, because
their assaults were made at night. It has been possible to take away from them only
twice the female slaves which they had taken as well in San Luis as elsewhere, and that
winter and part of the summer were spent in great anxiety and alarm until they had
finished their digging. The digging being once finished, and being on armed night
watch in the cabin of San Luis the said chiefs, Juan Mendoza and Matheo and Benito
Ynija, discussing the case with other leading men of the settlement of San Luis, they
proposed to go out and hunt for the enemy. Some of them said, “We need not be
given leave to go,” while others said, “It could not be denied us, since every day the
enemy alarms us, and we are without tranquillity, and every day they kill our rela-
tives, and what is more they enslave some of them and carry them off and commit all
kinds of mockery with them; and we are all Christians and vassals of the king whom
may God protect for many years, and we are unanimous and agree in this matter. ”

They all went and asked leave of the said Captain Juan Fernandez as of their lieu-
tenant and war captain and the head of said province. Upon being told of their reso-
lution, he gladly gave them said leave, and he furthermore comforted and animated
them and promised to help them in every way possible, and they all came into this
cabin.! The chiefs, the caciques, and other leading men were very well satisfied and
joyous, and they began instantly to prepare their arms, their provisions, and bundles,
and they sent out messengers to the people of the other places, telling their caciques
and leading men, that, in case they should want to go and join them, they might be
able to make their preparations. From San Luis there went 85 men with their arms;
from the place called San Damian went its cacique, Don Bernardo with seventy men;
from la Chine, which is a settlement in the district of San Luis, 8 men; from los Cha-
catos, Which also lies within the boundaries of San Luis, 10 men; from Ayubale, came
2 men, and 3 from Tomole; also 1 from Azpalaga. These latter came without being
sent by their caciques, who for some reasons which they gave excused themselves.
When everything was prepared and in readiness the lieutenant reported it to the
governor and his excellency approved of it and thanked the said Indians for their good
intentions. The captain, Juan Fernandez, all being gathered in this cabin (bujio),
provided ammunition for all the harquebusiers, and he likewise gave us a small jar of
powder and a “‘sucuche” ? of bullets, and we left on the 2nd of September, 1677, after
the captain, Juan Fernandez, at the meeting in the cabin, had appointed as principal
chiefs, Juan Mendoza, captain of San Luis; Mateo Chubas, Maese del Campo, chief
of the camp, or. in the field; and Don Bernardo, cacique and captain of the settlement
of San Damian de Cupayca, and Ventura Ynija of this place, admonishing them to
behave like united brothers, as well on the journey as on the battlefield. When the
necessary orders had been given, we departed and went to sleep at the River Lagino, _
which is at a distance of two leagues from here, and where we arrived early. When all
the people were together, we counted the men, finding that we had thirty firearms—
15 from this place, San Luis, and 15 from San Damian, and between harquebusiers and
archers there were 190. The chiefs made speeches to their men, telling them that they
were men who could defend their homes, their wives, and children, and that with the
help of God our wishes would be fulfilled and we would see our enemies. As Chris-
tians, God and His Blessed Mother would favour us. Then they arranged that 12 men
should explore the country inland as spies, 12 should remain behind, each group being
protected by several harquebusiers.

As it seemed early yet, we went to sleep on the banks of a small stream two leagues
distant, called Lapache, which are studded with canes or reed. We placed our
watches and night patrol, a precaution which was taken at all the places where we
arrived. This place (Lapache) we left when the sun was high and arrived at noon at

1 This may mean the guardhouse.
2 This is now a nautical term and means a storeroom of a ship.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 301

a little stream called Ystobalaga and went to sleep near another one called Ytaechato
and there our watches and patrols said they had heard a noise which kept them in
arms, and the next day we saw tracks of two persons away from the road. We took
our noonday-rest ' at a rivulet, wooded on both banks and from there we sent out
spies to go as far as the river Santa Cruz. These returned to tell us that there were
no other tracks but those of the people of Santa Cruz, which lies on the bank of the
stream, where the cacique Baltasar awaited with about twenty men with. canoes to
ferry us across the river. We arrived at that river and went to the place mentioned,
which is on the other bank, and there we remained for two days provisioning ourselves.
From there we despatched twenty-four men to go ahead as spies. When we were
ready to leave the cacique Baltasar came with six of his men, saying that he was a
vassal of His Majesty, and that although he was but a new Christian, his heart was in
God and His Blessed Mother, and that he gladly was coming along to die for God,
our Lord, for his king, and for his country. We thanked him, telling him that it was
a great joy to die for God. We went to sleep near a lagoon, to one side of the road
and about four leagues from Santa Cruz on a plain. The spies came back, telling us
they had seen a trail which, although it was not fresh, seemed to show that it was of
bad people. The next day we departed and arrived at a spring which is called
Calutoble,? from which flows a river toward the south. From here we went to sleep
in a great forest * which is called Chapole. The next morning we prayed and recom-
mended ourselves to Our Lady, it being her day, that she might help us in everything,
for she was our patroness and our guide.

Then we journeyed onand for rest arrived at the deserted site of San Nicolas de los
Chacatos. From there we went to San Carlos, which is also abandoned by the said
Chacatos, and where we slept to one side of it [the settlement]. The next morning
early we surrounded the whole place in order to find out whether there were any
Chiscas in it, since it was their stopping place. We did not take the road which
heads toward the west because it goes to the region in which the Chiscas are settled,
who naturally had their sentinels everywhere, so we went southward without taking
to a road until we found one which led from the sea to the village of the Chiscas and
which the Chacatos and Panzacolas had opened (built), who had settled by the sea
and on which we traveled with our spies ahead and behind us, exploring the country
about. That night we slept by a rivulet with a small growth of wood and the next
day we departed without food, because our provisions had given out. All we had
that morning was a handful of ‘‘tolocomo,’’ which is made of parched corn, and we
did not eat till the next day. In the evening we arrived at the river Gurani and we
passed on to Bipar, leaving sentinels, arms in hand, on either bank of the stream.
. On the next day, which was the tenth of the journey since we had left Apalache,
we lost our way, very soon after starting and without any determined road we traveled
westward, passing small streams with a big growth of reed, small creeks with many
- obstacles, narrow but very deep. The spies who had gone ahead returned and told
us that they had seen many tracks and footpaths of bison and: therefore we determined
to rest for the night where they had seen them, trying to kill some with which to
make our shields and still our hunger, since our provisions had entirely given out.
The next morning the Chacatos who went with us killed a cow and we dried the skin.
One of the men fell ill with fever and pain in his side, and some said that several of
us ought to return with the sick man; others said no, and the patient himself said no,
that he would prefer that they should carry him, in order that he might die seeing
his enemies. :

1 “Sestear” is properly ‘“‘to take a nap.”’
2 Kali, spring. :
3“ Monte grande”’ could also mean a great mountain, but it is evidently a great forest. -

302 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 73

The next day’s travel brought us to a dense forest which we traversed and we slept
on the other side of it. The next day we traveled in the rain and slept by a spring
and the day following, after about one league’s traveling, we arrived at a big river
called Napa Ubab, which was as thickly wooded on one bank as on the other; we
crossed it that day and, as our provisions had given out, we slept on the opposite
bank. While there we heard the Chacatos, who were in our company, say that they
suffered a great many hardships and privations (hunger), that the Apalachinos although
great in number, did not know how to fight, and, upon seeing the palisades of the
Chiscas, they most assuredly would run away, while they themselves would perish.
Therefore they wished to return, but that of course, they would not be allowed to
return, if they showed themselves on the roads. We, the said chiefs, called them
and together we said to them, ‘‘Children, we are Christians and we bear all those
sufferings with great patience, so you also have patience. We all will have to have
it until we see our enemies. And should you try toreturn, we would take you on
by force until you take us to the place where the palisade of the Chiscasis and you
shall guide us. Once there, then, you may fight 1f you so wish to, and if not you can
stand aside,’’ which they really did, for only three of them fought beside us. The next
morning we despatched spies on two different sides, and we traveled all day, night
overtaking us on a little river, called Oclacasquis, whichis Rio Colorado. That night
some spies came back, telling us that they had seen tracks of bison and people who
followed them (the bison). We were very anxious, because twelve of the spies
whom we had sent out did not return all that night. In the morning we called those
who had seen the tracks and ordered them to go ahead and see if they saw more tracks»
and we followed them. Very soon they came running back, telling us that they had
seen the Chiscas curing meat in smoke. We at once distributed our men on two
wings in order to catch them between our forces and see if we could get them alive,
but they defended themselves so that it became necessary to kill them. There were
two. We remained there and on that day at about eight o’clock, the twelve men
who had been missing fired a shot. We answered with another, and upon arriving
where we were, they told us that they had lost their way, and they were greatly
consoled at the sight of ears of corn which we had taken from the two Chiscas, con-
sidering them (the Chiscas) to be near by.

We continued our journey and on the seventeenth day after our departure from
Apalache we rested for the night near a small lagoon, traveling the next day, always
in a westerly direction, We despatched three men ahead to look for the road which
led to the Chiscas, because the Chacatos had been overheard to say that we must be
near to judge from the forests (or mountains) which they recognized. A short while
afterwards the spies came back, telling us that they had found the road which led to
the Chiscas, and we traveled until at about sunset we were on the said road. Some
were of the opinion that we ought to pass the night where we had been when told
about this place, others that we ought to sleep right here in order to reach the palisade
early in the morning, but when we were all together the chiefs decided that we were
not to sleep at all, but to keep right on advancing, and with the help of God reach
the said palisade, because this was the eve of Saint Matthew, the Apostle. After
having traveled about one league we heard noises and a drum and saw big fires, and
we noticed that the road was a track greatly beaten by people who returned to the
palisades of the Chacatos, Panzacolas, and Chiscas who lived near the sea, and we
retired to a height to prepare ourselves, examine our arms, and fit ourselves up.
Then all the chiefs gathered and we held a consultation about what was to be done.
Some proposed to wait until sunrise, others to strike at midnight, still others shortly
before sunrise. Finally we all agreed to make it a quarter before sunrise. Thus it
was ordered, and we admonished our men. Then we sent two men ahead of us and
most courageously followed them, and very soon we reached them, and they told us

i
a
L;
;
a
y

‘

TE a Ae a oak te al

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 303

to look inside [the palisade], and that there were a great many people; that the
inclosure was very big and spacious, the extent of each wall being over three hun-
dred paces. They said the Chiscas were not sleeping; on the contrary there was
much noise and they kept up big fires within and without. When we had all reached
the place we sat down to watch the palisades and the great fires, and we entered into
consultation whether it would be advisable to surround the inclosure, but as it was
so big and we had few men, we did not dare do that, but determined to attack along
one wall, and that this attack would be at three o’clock in the morning. Two cap-
tains and the Maese de Campo, Matheo Chuba, were to attack in the center, carrying
the banner with the crucifix on one side and on the other Our Lady of the Rosary;
the captain Don Bernardo on the east side with his drum and fife; Captain Juan
Mendoza on the west side. About the time we got up to make the attack we saw a
great light of the size of a man flame up behind us and then consume itself. In its
center it had a blue spot. We saw about thirty persons, and at this instant a Chacato
who was on sentinel duty cried out that we were there.

We all attacked at once, giving them a whole charge of harquebus and archery and
pulling out the sticks [from the palisade], and through the openings the captains
threw themselves in upon the enemy with their harquebusiers, killing our enemies,
Within the palisades there were three big houses with their embrasures, where so
many of the Chiscas retired and shot’so many arrows at us from their shelter that it
looked like a dense smoke. As we carried with us small levers, we destroyed, helped
by our firearms, many boards, and we killed and wounded so many that the wounded
began fleeing and threw themselves into the river to drown themselves. Our car-
tridges set fire to the houses, They killed five of our men and wounded forty. There
was a tree which had caught fire from our firearms and its burning leaves set fire to
many houses, and the fact that although it was green it should have caught fire and
should burn like tinder greatly excited our attention. When the Chiscas saw that
wonder they threw themselves into the river which is in a ravine there, as well men
as women with their small babies clasped to their bosoms. Although we wished to
save them and keep them alive, they were almost dead and drowned. We found
others alive under the corn cribs (barbacoas), and we pulled them out, separating the
dead from the burned (or wounded) ones, and in so doing covered ourselves with
blood from head to foot. Putting out the fire of the several houses that were burning,
we found eighteen men and one boy dead. We did not count the women and chil-
dren, for as they had hidden in sentry boxes and behind or under boarding many of
them were consumed by the fire. All this lasted from three o’clock in the morning
until sunrise, when we saw that the Chiscas had all fled and had crossed the river
swimming.

We cured our wounded and reinforced our position with the sticks of the palisade
which had remained, building a small inclosure to guard ourselves against those of
our enemies still alive, whose loud shrieking on the other side of the river we heard.
Although within the palisades we had found provisions, they were but scarce, and
in our chiefs’ council we decided to send out thirty men to search the plains for food

and also to search the forests, for throughout that day we had been shot upon with

arrows from the river bank, and as the river was but narrow they reached us. But
we did notallow our men to cross the river, because somany of our men were wounded.
Thus, our men were to remain on land on this side. As we were sallying forth in a
little troop, one of the Chiscas shot an arrow from a sentry box and wounded one of
our men after he had got some provisions. One of our men said he wanted to go back
to the palisade, and, although he was admonished against it, he did not listen, and,
traversing the forest, he found some Chiscas in ambush, who killed him. The rest

1 There is evidently something lacking or the published version is poorly copied from the original,

304. _ BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 73

of us went back to our palisade with our provisions, and we spent two days and two
nights there, taking great precautions, keeping constant watches, and beating our
war drums morning and night. All that time we heard many screams and shouts,
and after a consultation among the chiefs we agreed to leave on the third day, setting
fire to all that had remained. When the Chiscas saw the fire, heard the drums, and,
besides, saw us come forth in two bodies, carrying our wounded in the center, a troop
of them came to encounter us in the same road. - Captain Bernardo de Cupayca dis-
charged his gun, and with one shot hit a Chisca so fairly that he fell dead, and the
Enija! from San Luis, Ventura, fired and killed another one, and our men wanted
to goand scalp them, which, however, the chiefs did not allow. The Chiscas fled,
and we continued on our way, enduring great suffering. After about half a league we
reached a clearing, where we found four shells and several pots in which were boiled
herbs. Weasked the Chacatos what this might signify, and they told us it was witch-
craft, in order that we might lose our way and not be able to reach our country, so
that we might fall into their hands and be killed by them. But it pleased God that
after eight days we entered the deserted country of the Chacatos very glad, carrying
our wounded on litters, and on the ninth day we met a troop of people who came from
Apalache to bring us provisions, which comforted us greatly, and we continued very
happily, entering Apalache on the fifth day of October of the year 1677, by the favor
of God and the Virgin of the Rosary.

I give my oath and true testimony, I, Captain Juan Fernandez de Florencia, lieu-
tenant of this province of Apalache, that there appeared before me the said Juan Men-
doza, Matheo Chuba, and Don Bernardo, the cacique of Cupayca, and Ventura, Ynija,
of this place of San Luis, who, in their own language, declared the above stated and
all that is written down, which I remit in the original to the governor, Don Pablo de
Hita Salazar, governor and captain general of the garrison of San Agustin and its
provinces by His Majesty. Made (written) in San Luis de Talimali on the 30th of
August, 1678.

JUAN FERNANDEZ DE FLORENCIA.?

Later the same incorrigible people are held responsible, jointly
with the English, for having prevented the establishment of a mis-
sion among the Apalachicola.

On the Lamhatty map (1707) these Yuchi appear in approxi-
mately the same position under the name Ogolatighoo [Hogologe].’
In 1718 we hear of a ‘‘ Rio de los Chiscas,” 5 leagues from Pensacola.‘
In the census taken in 1761 we find the “Choctaw Hatchee Euchees”’
included with the Tukabahchee and ‘Pea Creek and other planta-
tions” under the traders James McQueen and T. Perryman,® and
these are probably the Yuchi of the French census of the same
period located close to the Tukabahchee and said to number 15
men.* Weare to infer from this that they had then settled among the
Upper Creeks. Their possible connection with the Yuchi reported
by Hawkins to have united with the Shawnee on Tallapoosa River
has already been mentioned.” We hear nothing more about them
from this time on, but their name is preserved in EKuchee anna, a
village in Walton County, Florida.

1 See p. 299. Enija is another spelling of Ynija. 5 Ga. Col. Docs., VIM, p. 522.
2 Serrano y Sanz, Doc. Hist., pp. 207-216. 6 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 95.
8 Amer. Anthrop., n.s. vol. X, p. 571. 7Seep 190.

4 See p. 126.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 805

In 1603 some old soldiers reported to Goy. Ibarra, of Florida,
“that 20 leagues from Orista [in this case probably Santa Elena] is
a rich people so civilized that they have their houses of hewn stone—
that is, toward the northeast from whence they came, conquering
those [Indians] of our lands.”’' This may refer to Yuchi, although

the mention of “hewn stone’ houses tends to place the account
under suspicion. Another possible reference to the influx of this
band appears in a letter to the king from Gov. D. Alonso de
-Aranguiz y Cotes, dated September 8, 1662. He says:

In a letter of Nov. 8, of the past year, 1661, I recounted to Y. M. how in the province
of Goale, near this presidio, there had entered some Indians who were said to be
Chichumecos which ate human flesh, and if I had not assisted in opposing their design
they would have destroyed it, as I had had news regarding others from infidel Indians
who came fleeing from them, and as I saw that they would retire by the way they came
I made examinations and inquiries in different directions until I took four prisoners
near the province of Apalachecole which is a hundred and eighty leagues distant from
this presidio. Having sent infantry for the purpose I took some Indians of the Chisca
Nation to serve as interpreters of their language because there was no one in these prov-
inces who could understand them, and they said they were from Jacan, that when they
retired from the province of Goale they went to that of Tama and to that of Catufa,
and that there they wandered about in different bands, and the said Chisca Indians,
after having explained what people they were said that very near the lands of those
people there was only one very large river, on the middle course of which had fortified
themselves a nation of white people who warred with them continually and were
approaching these provinces, and they do not know whether they are Spaniards or
English.!

The position which the Indians describe as that of their former home,
along with their proximity to the white people, strongly suggests
that occupied by the Rechahecrians on the James, yet it is strange
that they should be unable to state whether their white neighbors

“were or were not English. These new arrivals are spoken of as if
distinct from the ‘‘Chisca’’—a fact tending to throw doubt on their
Yuchean affinities; but it is probable that the term Chisca was
limited by the governer to that band of Yuchi with which the
Spaniards were familiar until then, those who had made their
home on Choctawhatchee River. These invading ‘‘Chichumecos”’
may have been the Indians who appear soon afterwards in the
narratives of the early English explorers of the Carolina coast
and the accounts of the South Carolina colonists, under the name
of Westo. The members of the expedition which in 1670 made
the first permanent settlement learned that these Westo had
attacked and destroyed the Cusabo towns at St. Helena and
Kiawa. They found that the coast Indians were mortally afraid of
them and accused them of being cannibals, an accusation for which
there appears to have been no justification.’

’ Lowery, MSS. 2 See p. 66.
148061 °—22——20

306 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

In the summer of this same year (1670) John Lederer, exploring
southwest from Virginia on his own recognizance, heard of this
tribe through their neighbors and enemies, the Catawba, whom he
calls Ushery. He says:

This prince [i. e., the prince of the Ushery Indians], though his dominions are large
and populous, is in continual fear of the Oustack Indians on the opposite side of the
lake—a people so addicted to arms that even their women come into the field and
shoot arrows over their husbands’ shoulders, who shield them with leathern targets.
The men it seems should fight with silver-hatchets; for one of the Usheryes told me
that they were of the same metal with the pomel of my sword. They are a cruel
generation, and prey upon people whom they either steal or force away from the Ush-
eryes in Periago’s, to sacrifice to their idols.!

That the Westo were then at war with the Iswa (Lederer’s
Ushery), a branch of the Catawba, is plainly indicated in the South
Carolina archives.

In 1672-73 they attacked the South Carolina settlers.* In 1674
Henry Woodward, the interpreter of the colony, visited a Westo
town on Savannah River somewhere below the present Augusta.
He describes his visit thus:

Haveing paddled about a league upp [the Savannah] wee came in sight of ye Westoe
towne, alias ye Hickauhaugau which stands uppon a poynt of ye river (which is
undoubtedly ye river May) uppon ye Westerne side soe y* ye river encompasseth
two-thirds thereof. When we came win [sight] of the towne I fired my fowling piece
* & pistol w°® was answered with a hollow & imediately thereuppon they gave mee
a vollew of fifty or sixty smallarms. Here wasa concourse of some hundred of Indians
drest up in their anticke fighting garbe. Through ye midst of whom being conducted
te their cheiftaines house ye which not being capable to containe ye crowd yt came
to see me, ye smaller fry got up & uncouvered the top of ye house to satisfy their
curiosity. Ye cheife of ye Indians made long speeches intimateing their own strength
(& as I judged their desire of Freindship w* us). This night first haveing oyled my
eyes and joynts with beares oyl, they presented mee divers deare skins setting before
me sufficient of their food to satisfy at least half a dozen of their owne appetites. Here
takeing my first nights repose, ye next day I viewed ye Towne which is built in a
confused manner, consisting of many long houses whose sides and tops are both arti-
fitially done w"* barke uppon ye tops of most whereof fastened to ye ends of long poles
hang ye locks of haire of Indians that they have slaine. Ye inland side of ye towne
being duble Pallisadoed, & y* part which fronts ye river haveing only a single one,
under whose steep banks seldom ly less then one hundred faire canoes ready uppon
all occasions. They are well provided with arms, amunition, tradeing cloath &
other trade from ye northward for which at set times of ye year they truck drest deare
skins furrs & young Indian Slaves. In ten daies time y* I tarried here I viewed ye
adjacent part cf ye Country, they are Seated uppon a most fruitfull soyl. Ye earth is
intermingled w* a sparkling substance like Antimony, finding severall flakes of
TIsinglass in ye paths. Ye soales of my Indian shooes in which I travelled glistened
like sylver. Ye clay of which their pots & pipes are made is intermingled w ye
like substance ye wood land is abounding w* various sorts of very large straite timber.
Eight dais journey from ye towne ye River hath it first falls West. N. West were it

1Lederer, Discoveries, pp. 20-21.
28. C. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 428.
s[bid., pp. 406, 427-428, 461,

PN?

* swanTon] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 307

divides it selfe into three branches, amongst which dividing branches inhabit ye
Cowatoe and Chorakae Indians w'" whom they are at continual warrs. Forty miles
distant from the towne northward they say lye ye head of Aidistaw river being a
great meer or lake. Two days before my departure arrived two Savana Indians living
as they said twenty days journey West Scuthwardly from them. There was none here
y* understood them but by signes they intreated freindship of ye Westoes showeing
y* ye Cussetaws, Chaesaws & Chiskers! were intended to come downe and fight ye
Westoes. At which news they expeditiously repaired their pallisadoes, keeping watch
all night. In the time of my abode here they gave me a young Indian boy taken from
ye falls of y* River. The Savana Indians brought Spanish beeds & other trade as
presents makeing signes yt they had comerce w* white people like unto mee, whom
were not good. These they civilly treated & dismissed before my departure ten of
them prepared to accompany mee in my journey home.?

As pointed out by Professor Crane, ‘‘ Hickauhaugau”’ is probably
miscopied from ‘ Rickauhaugau”’ and is a synonym for Rickohockan.

In April, 1680, the governor of South Carolina had a confer-
ence with certain of the Westo chiefs, but later the Westo at-
tacked some coast Indians, friendly to the colonists. War followed
between them and the English, and, according to the colonial
historians, it would have been disastrous to the new settlements
had not a body of Shawnee fallen upon their enemies and driven them
away from the Savannah.’ This happened in 1681, and the Indians
thus dispossessed appear to have settled on Ocmulgee River near the
Coweta, then living in the neighborhood of the present Butts County,
Georgia. At any rate Fray Francisco Gutierrez de Vera states, in a
letter dated May 19, 1681, largely concerned with the Chatot mission,
that the Coweta chief had arrived and reported that ‘many Chu-
_ chumecas” had come to live at his town. There was certainly a
settlement of Westo near there, numbering 15 men at the outbreak of
the Yamasee war. But from the note discovered by Professor
Crane it is probable that their numbers had been augmented by other
Yuchi from the north.® Individuals, as we have seen, strayed far
enough westward to meet the French under La Salle.®

During or immediately after the Yamasee war they retired
beyond the Chattahoochee, where they are located .on maps of the
eighteenth century for a long time afterwards” They appear to have
lived close to the mouth of Little Uchee Creek, Russell County,
Alabama. They probably united with the main Yuchi town after
its removal to Alabama, but we have no‘direct evidence regarding
the time or manner in which this event took place. On the Purcell
map, however, we find a town called Woristo, between Kasihta and

1 This seems to be the original spelling of these names, which I have restored. The editor of the nar-
rative gave them as Cussetaws, Checsaws, and Chiokees.

2S. C. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, pp. 459-461.

* Hewat, Hist. Acct. S. C. and Ga., pp. 63-64.

4 Lowery, MSS.

6 See p. 291.

See p. 296,

308 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Okmulgee (pl. 7).. As the large Yuchi town and the Westo town
were both here it seems probable that Woristo is meant for Westo,
and that it was used for all of the Yuchi, especially since there is
every reason to believe that the Westo town proper had already
been given up.

In 1708 a rough Indian census made on behalf of the State of South
Carolina makes no mention of Yuchi Indians, though they may be
included in the eleven Lower Creek towns referred to,’ but the de-
tailed census of 1715 gives two Yuchi towns 180 miles W. N. W. of
Charleston.?, They were probably north of the Shawnee on Savannah
River between Augusta, Georgia, and the Cherokee, and constituted
the band which moved over to the Chattahoochee after the Yamasee
war. This band is the one to which the term Hogologe is attached
more particularly. They were accompanied by a part of the Shawnee
and the Apalachicola Indians, the latter under Cherokee leechee.?

As nearly as can be made out from the maps they settled near the
mouth of Cowikee Creek in Barbour County, Alabama, but before
many years they accompanied the Shawnee to Tallapoosa River.
Their name is mentioned by Romans when enumerating the
Creek tribes,t and their town is probably the Chisketaloofa of the
census of 1761, which had 30 hunters and was assigned, along with
Weupkees (Okitiyagana), to the traders Macartan and Campbell.
Morse enumerates “Cheskitalowas” among the Seminole villages.®
The name Chiska also appears in much later documents associated
with a point near the lower Chattahoochee. In a letter from the
Secretary of the Treasury transmitting copies of the report of the
Commissioners of Land Claims in East and West Florida, February
22, 1825 (pub., Washington, 1825), Cheeskatalofa is mentioned as a
town in which a meeting was held (p. 18). But while the name pre-
served a memory of them, the greater part of the Yuchi had proba-
bly moved even before 1761, since we know that their Shawnee
friends had already done so. For a conjecture as to their subsequent
fortunes see my discussion of the Tamahita, pages 188-191.

Shortly after the Yamasee war another influx of Yuchee into the
Savannah country took place, though little specific mformation
regarding this seems to be preserved. The new arrivals settled at
or near Silver Bluff, at Mount Pleasant, and as far down the river as
Ebenezer Creek.

Hawkins says that there were villages at Ponpon and Saltkechers, ~
in South Carolina,’ but this is the sole evidence we have regarding

18. C. Pub. Does., v., pp. 207-209. _

?Rivers, Hist. S. C., p. 94.

‘Brinton, The Floridian Peninsula, p. 141; see also p. 131.
‘Romans, Nat. Hist. E. and W. Fla., p. 280.

5 Ga. Col. Does., vim, p. 523.

6 Page 409; Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 364.
7 See p. 309.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 809

settlements so far to the east of the Savannah. Possibly some Coosa
Indians of South Carolina afterwards combined with them. After
the establishment of a Yuchi settlement on the Chattahoochee by
~ Chief Ellick of the Kasihta, in the year 1729, as will be detailed below,
they began to make their permanent residence more and more among
the Creeks, using their old territories principally for hunting. Al-
though the white settlers naturally coveted these lands, left vacant
for so much of the time, Governor Oglethorpe restrained them and
preserved the territory inviolate until after 1740. Not many years
later they had been practically given over by the Yuchi themselves.
Two very good descriptions of the Yuchi town on the Chattahoochee
have been preserved to us—one by Bartram and one by Hawkins.
It stood at the mouth of the present Big Uchee Creek. Bartram,
who passed through the place in 1778, says of it:

The Uche town is situated in a low ground immediately bordering on the river; it
is the largest, most compact, and best situated Indian town I ever saw; the habita-
tions are large and neatly built; the walls of the houses are constructed of a wooden
frame, then lathed and plastered inside and out with a reddish well-tempered clay or
mortar, which gives them the appearance of red brick walls; and these houses are
neatly covered or roofed with Cypress bark or shingles of that tree. The town ap-
‘peared to be populous and thriving, full of youth and young children. I suppose the
number of inhabitants, men, women and children, might amount to one thousand or
fifteen hundred, as it is said they are able to muster five hundred gunmen or warriors.
Their own national language is altogether or radically different from the Creek or
Muscogulge tongue, and is called the Savanna or Savanuca tongue; I was told by the
traders it was the same with, or a dialect of the Shawanese. They are in confederacy
with the Creeks, but do not mix with them; and on account of their numbers and
strength, are of importance enough to excite and draw upon them the jealousy of the
whole Muscogulge confederacy, and are usually at variance, yet are wise enough to
unite against a common enemy, to support the interest and glory of the general Creek
confederacy.’

Of course the Shawnee and Yuchi languages are radically distinct.
Bartram was led into the error of supposing a relation to subsist
between them by the fact that the two tribes were on very intimate
terms, were mixed together, and both spoke languages quite different
from Creek.’

Hawkins’s description follows:

U-chee: is on the right bank of Chat-to-ho-che, ten and a half miles below Cow-e-tuh
tal-lau-has-see, on a flat of rich land, with hickory, oak, blackjack, and long-leaf pine;
the flat extends from one to two miles back from the river. Above the town, and
bordering on it, Uchee Creek, eighty-five * feet wide, joins the river. Opposite the
town house, on the left bank of the river, there is a narrow strip of flat land from fifty
to one hundred yards wide, then high pine barren hills; these people speak a tongue
different from the Creeks; they were formerly settled in small villages at Ponpon,
Saltketchers (Sol-ke-chuh), Silver Bluff, and O-ge-chee, and were continually at war
with the Cherokees, Ca-tau-bau, and Creeks.

1 Bartram, Travels, pp. 386-387. 3 The Lib. Cong. MS. has ‘‘45.”’
3 See p. 190.

510 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [pon 73

In the year 1729, an old chief of Cussetuh, called by the white people Captain
Ellick, married three Uchee women, and brought them to Cussetuh, which was greatly
disliked by his towns people; their opposition determined him to move from Cussetuh;
he went down opposite where the town now is, and settled with his three brothers;
two of whom had Uchee wives; he, after this, collected all the Uchees, gave them the
land where their town now is, and there they settled.

These people are more civil and orderly than their neighbors; their women are more
chaste, and the men better hunters; they retain all their original customs and laws,
and have adopted none of the Creeks; they have some worm fences in and about their
town, but very few peach trees.

They have lately begun to settle out in villages, and are industrious, compared with —

their neighbors; the men take part in the labors of the women, and are more constant
in their attachment to their women than is usual among red people.

The number of gun men is variously estimated; they do not exceed two hundred and
fifty, including all who are settled in villages, ae which they have three.

Ist. In-tuch-cul-gau; from in-tuch-ke, adam across water [a ‘‘cut off]; and ul-gau,
all; applied to beaver dams. This is on Opil-thluc-co, twenty-eight miles from its
junction with Flint River. This creek is sixty feet wide at its mouth, one and a half
miles above Timothy Barnard’s; the land bordering on the creek, up to the village, is
good. Eight miles below the village the good land spreads out for four or five miles
on both sides of the creek, with oaky woods (Tuck-au-mau-pa-fau); the range is fine
for cattle; cane grows on the creeks, and reeds on all the branches.

They have fourteen families in the village; their industry is increasing; they built
asquare in 1798, which serves for their town house; they have a few cattle, hogs, and
horses.!

2d. Pad-gee-li-gau [padjilaiga]; from pad-jee, a pidgeon; and ligau, sit; pidgeon
roost. This was formerly a large town, but broken up by Benjamin Harrison and his
associates, who murdered sixteen of their gun men in Georgia; it is on the right bank
of Flint River, and this creek, adjoining the river; the village takes its name from the
creek; it is nine miles below the second falls of the river;? these falls are at the island’s
ford, where the path now crosses from Cussetuh to Fort Wilkinson; the village is
advantageoulsy situated; the land is rich, the range good for cattle and hogs; the swamp
is more than three miles through, on the left bank of the river, and is high and good
canebrake; on the right bank, it is one mile through, low and flat; the cane, sassafras,
and sumach, are large; this extensive and valuable swamp extends down on one side or
the other of the river for twelve miles.

They have but a few families there, notwithstanding it is one of the best situations
the Indians possess, for stock, farming, and fish. Being a frontier, the great loss
they sustained in having sixteen of their gun men murdered discourages them from
returning.

3d. Toc-co-gul-egau (tad pole) [téki ilga, tadpole place]; a small settlement on Kit-
cho-foo-ne Creek, near some beaver dams on branches of that creek; the land is good,
but broken; fine range, small canes, and pea vines on the hills, and reeds on the branches;
they have eight or ten families; this establishment is of two years only, and they have
worm fences. U-che Will, the head of the village has some cattle, and they have

promised to attend to hogs, and to follow the direction of the agent for Indian affairs,

as soon as they can get into stock.

1 Also see Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, pp. 171-172.

218 miles above Timothy Barnard’s and 9 miles below the old horse path, the first rock falls in the
river. ’’—Hawkins, in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, p. 171.

3 Another description by the same writer, largely parallel, is in Ga. Hist. Soc, Colls., 1x, p. 171.

;
%
e
%
*
ar

age

7."

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 811

Some of the Uchees have settled with the Shaw-a-ne, at Sau-va-no-gee, among the
Creeks of the upper towns. !

I will also add what Hawkins has to say regarding the settlement
of Timothy Barnard, who plays a prominent part in Creek history,
both before and after this time:

This gentleman lives on the right bank of Flint River, fifteen miles below Pad-jee-
li-gau. He has eleven children by a U-chee woman, and they are settled with and
around him, and have fine stocks of cattle in an excellent range. He has a valuable
property, but not productive; his farm is well fenced on both sides of the river; he
has a peach orchard of fine fruit, and some fine nectarines, a garden well stored with
vegetables, and some grape vines presented to him by the agent. He is an assistant
and interpreter, and a man who has uniformly supported an honest character, friendly
to peace during the revolutionary war, and to man. He has 40 sheep, some goats,
and stock of every description, and keeps a very hospitable house. He is not much
acquainted with farming, and receives light slowly on this subject, as is the case

with all the Indian countrymen, without exception.” ”

The trader located at the main Yuchi town in 1797 is given by
Hawkins as James Smithmoor.’

The Yuchi also appear in the enumerations of 1760,‘ 1761,° that
of Swan,°® and in the census of 1832, when they were credited with
one main town and with a branch village called High Log.7. During
the latter part of the eighteenth century and the first of the nine-
teenth, settlements of Yuchi were probably scattered through south-
ern Georgia at many places. Imlay says ‘‘The Uchees Indians oc-
cupy four different places of residence, at the head of St. John’s, the
Fork of St. Mary’s, the head of Cannuchee, and the head of St.
Tillis (Satilla).’’§

After their removal to the new Creek territories west of the
Mississippi they settled in the northwestern part of the nation, where
they continued an almost distinct tribal life, although represented
in the Creek national assembly. The reader is referred to Dr.
Speck’s admirable paper for an account of their later condition.®

Besides the Savannah, the Yuchi also occupied at least the upper
portion of Ogeechee River. This is indicated by Hawkins in his
account of the Yuchi town just given and also by several maps of
the eighteenth century, in which the Ogeechee is called ‘‘Great
Ogeechee or Hughchee River,’ the latter being one spelling of the

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, pp. 61-63.

2Tbid., pp. 66-67.

8Tbid., 1x, p. 171.

# Miss Prov. Arch., I, p. 96.

5 Ga. Col. Docs., vim, p. 522.

6 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.

7 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., I'v, pp. 356-363; Schoolcraft, op. cit., p. 578.
8 Imlay, Top. Descr. of N. A., p. 369.

9 Univ. of Pa., Anthrop. Publ., 1, No. 1.

10 Jefferys, Am. Atlas, map 24.

312 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 73

name Yuchi. On many maps we find ‘‘Ogeechee Old Town”’ laid
down near the upper course of Ogeechee River and on the trading
path from Augusta to Ocmulgee old fields and the Creek country.
The way in which this appears indicates that the town had re-
moved at the time of the Yamasee war, when it may have united with
those Yuchi known as Westo, the larger body of Yuchi not migrating
until some years later. Their fate is somewhat confused by the fol-
lowing reference in Bartram:

Mr. Egan politely rode with me over a great part of the island (Amelia). On Egmont
estate are several very large Indian tumuli, which are called Ogeeche mounts, so
named from that nation of Indians who took shelter here, after being driven from
their native settlements on the main near Ogeeche River. Here they were con-
stantly harrassed by the Carolinians and Creeks, and at length slain by their con-
querors, and their bones entombed in these heaps of earth and shells."

If there is any truth in this legend at all it is probable that the
people referred to were Yamasee, or at least Indians of the province
of Guale who had perhaps lived about the mouth of the Ogeechee,
but not the Ogeechee tribe we have been considering.

As noted above, a portion of the Yuchi went to Florida. They
appear first in west Florida near the Mikasuki,? but later they moved
across the peninsula and settled at Spring Garden, east of Dexters
Lake, in Volusia County. Afterwards they were involved in the long
Seminole war with the whites. All of them did not go in the first emi-
erations, a special census taken in the year 1847 giving four Yuchi
warriors among the Seminole left in the peninsula.*

THE NATCHEZ

The Natchez having been made the subject of a special study by the
writer,‘ no extended notice need be given here. Their earliest known
home was on St. Catharines Creek, Mississippi, close to the present
city which bears their name. After Louisiana was colonized by the
French the latter established a post among them, which was in a very
flourishing condition when, in the year 1729, it was suddenly cut off
by a native uprising. Subsequently the French attacked these
Indians, killed many, captured some, whom they sent to Santo
Domingo as slaves, and forced the rest to abandon their old country
and settle among the Chickasaw. When the French turned their
attacks against the Chickasaw the Natchez found it necessary to
move again, and some went to the Cherokee, some to the Catawba,

1 Bartram, Travels, pp. 63-64.

2See pp. 406, 409, 412.

Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, I, p. 522.

4Indian Tribes of the Lower Miss. Valley and Adj. Coast of the Gulf of Mex., Bull. 43, Bur. Amer.
Ethn., pp. 45-257.

14 (aie Rede tr na pat RIS EEA OPA LY PER ERE re pe bk

Sy tas SMR coe Sond

,
. 5

ttt ri, ae a

SWANTON] EPARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 313

and some to the Creeks. Those who went to the Cherokee and
Creeks subsequently followed their fortunes, and the latter band
was taken in by the Abihka. They seem to have conformed in most
particulars to the usages of their neighbors. Taitt thus describes his
visit to them on March 27, 1772:

I went this morning to black drink to the Square, where I was very kindley received
by the head men of the town who told me to look on myself as being amongst my
friends and not to be affraid of any thing, for their fire was the same as Charlestown
fire and they never had Spilt the blood of any white Man;! after that I had Smoked
Tobacco and drinked black drink with them they desired that I might Stay in their
Town all day as they were building a hot house and Should have a dance in the Even-
ing which they wanted me tosee. In the Evening I went to the Square where thirteen
Chickasaws had joined the Natchies and Creeks for the dance. . . The women
being dressed like Warriours with bows, hatchets, and other weapons in their hands,

came into the Square and danced round the fire, the pole Cat dance, two men Singing
and ratling their Callabashes all the time.’

Although having separate towns, the Natchez and Abihka are said
to have intermarried to such an extent as to become completely fused.
Since descent was reckoned in the female line the Natchez were still
distinguished from the Abihka through their mothers, and the lan-
guage was transmitted thus for many years, but it is now extinct.
Among the Cherokee the Natchez preserved their identity longer,
and a few Indians remain who can speak the old tongue. Among
the Creeks some stories are still told regarding them. Jackson
Lewis repeated a tradition to the effect that the Natchez were at
one time hemmed in by the French, but all that could move, men,
women, and children, escaped by wading through water. Then
they went to the Chickasaw to live, but after a time they found some
of their children who had gone out berrying run through with canes.
This was done by the Chickasaw, who did not want the Natchez
among them, so the latter moved on and came to where the Abihka
lived. They asked the Abihka to take them in and the Abihka told
them to “enter the gates” and confer with the chiefs, the Abihka
being the ‘‘door shutters’? of the confederacy. The Natchez did
this and were adopted. They were allowed to settle with the Abihka,
according to one story, because the Abihka were a very small people,
perhaps having been reduced in wars with the Cherokee. According
to Adair, some Chickasaw moved with the Natchez and the two
occupied a town called Ooe-asa, somewhere near the upper course of
Coosa River.’

To these few notes I will add the account which Stiggins gives of
this tribe which was not included in my bulletin above mentioned.

1 A notable prevarication, except on the supposition that the speaker meant English white men.
2 Mereness, Trav. Am. Col., pp. 531-532.
8 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 319.

314 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Tt is of particular interest inasmuch as Stiggins himself was a Natchez
Indian.!' It has not before been published.

The Natches.—The men of that tribe almost all converse in the Creek tongue, with
their families or not. Tho’ the women can speak it fluently yet most generally in their
own common concerns and to their children they use their own native tongue. Fre-
quently in one house they use both tongues without any detriment to their conversa-.
tion or business. ‘The tradition they relate as the cause of their removal from the
seat of their nativity to their final settlement in the Taladega Valley I will relate as I
heard it. That about one century ago that the tribe lived in one large body or tribe
on the bank of the Mississippi where the present city of Natches now stands and ex-
tended above it, that their government was monarchical, and that all cases both civil
and political were determined by the king and his suite, for he was attended by both
men and women in great state. The throne was hereditary and the king was supreme
head of the tribe. His person was sacred and his mandates inviolable. He lived ina
retired manner in the suburbs of the town, secluded from the society of all persons
but his own near relations, who officiated about his person both men and women as
attendants and guards, about one-third of his connection at a time, and such as were
not in attendance on his person were in the forest in search of game for his subsistance.
During the hunting excursion the party was headed by one of his near relatives to
direct and take care of the party. But it must be noticed that all earthly institutions
tho’ made for lasting happiness for ages, are delusive and visionary. So it happened
to them. For while they were living under their peaceable and happy institution of
government, a government familiarized to them by time, and consonant to their
habits of life, they received a visit from a detachment of French who went up the
river Mississippi to explore the country and fix on an eligible spot to,erect a garrison,
and without a previous compact with the natives to insure their good will. They
pitched on a site in the vicinity of the town. Tho’ much against the will of the
Indians, they disguised their chagrin and seemingly were careless and not opposed
to the encroachment of their unwelcome visitants and neighbors, who had fortified
themselves in the suburb below the town.

The French, by their gallantry, pursued the destructive course said to have been
in Sodom of olden time. As tho’ danger was not imbruing nor destruction awfully
pending over their ill-fated heads they made free with the men and married their
women. They were tolerated in their love to their women with seeming good will by _
the natives for they saw the advantage that would ultimately result through their
blind devotion to love, for it would make them unsuspicious and unguarded against
a design they had in contemplation to effect through that means. As was expected
their lewd practices soon caused a relaxation of their vigilance and discipline, for
they frequented the town at night in a careless manner and unguardedly admitted
the women into the fortress at night and made them welcome visitants at all times.
The Indians saw how remiss and negligent the French were getting in their manner of
living, as was expected, and they for revenge secretly and exultingly proceeded to put
their scheme into execution, which was to exterminate their gallant and unwelcome
neighbors. Therefore the Indian men concerted a plan with their women as though
without design for the women to make their appointments with the Frenchmen to be
and stay within the fortress on such a night, which appointment was accordingly
made and the garrison overreached. For when the time arrived, instead of the expected
women, the fortress was entered by men in disguise and armed, who on entrance
instantly fell to work and exterminated the whole garrison of men. One man escaped
because his loving wife, wishing to save him, had prevailed on him to stay with her

1 Probably a son of Joseph Stiggins, trader in the Natchez town in 1796.—Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc.
Colls., IX, p. 34.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 315 -

in the town that night, and after the above catastrophe she effected his escape down
the river Mississippi. So he carried the news of the disaster to his comrades to his
countrymen. |

The Indians were very much elated with the successful event of their plan, which
had even exceeded their most sanguine expectations, getting clear of their intruders
so quickly and easily without the loss of any of their own blood. But their joy was of
shortduration. They equipt themselves with the spoils of their vanquished neighbors,
in arms, clothing, provisions, and hats, which last they particularly admired, and they
did not suppose there were any more to revenge their horrid deed. In their enthusiasm
to take possession of their empty garrison that they so easily attained they unanimously
concluded and even prompted his majesty and all his suite, and all that could get
quarters to remove therein as the buildings were more commodious than those of the
town. Then, after they had arranged their new habitation and gotten all snug and
secure, the king sent out the usual hunting party headed by one of his nephews. But
after their hunting excursion was over and they returned, behold their surprise at
seeing a number of shipping moored in front of the fort and apparently the whole of
their tribe in the act of embarking on board of the shipping under the guard and con-
trol of two rows of white men with hats on similar to those worn by the people that
they destroyed. From the following circumstance I expect the whole of the tribe
were not captured, as there is a people on the south waters of the Missouri who call
themselves Natchez, who probably made their escape when those in the fortress were
surrounded and captured. All that were shipped off by the French were insulated and
settled in the island of St? Domingo where their progeny now remain. Their arms
offensive and defensive were bows and arrows pointed with either sharpened bone or
pieces of flint. With these weapons they attacked their enemy or killed their game for
subsistence. When those that had been a hunting returned and saw their tribe on the
ships and saw them disappear down the river, they could not imagine what would be
their destination and fate, so in their incertitude and perplexity of mind they con-
cluded to leave their forlorn case with the seat of their ancestors forever, and in the
scenes of a new and untried home forget the wreck of their tribe who they expected
were doomed to slavery and wretchedness. Having had intercourse and friendship
with the Chickasaws they moved to them first where some took up their abode, and
some with the Cherokees, but the greater part headed by the royal family, made a
compact of assimilation with the Aw bih kas or Creek tribe and settled in the Tallidega
Valley. They remained thus sequestered for about twenty-five years, when, at the
instance of their chief, they all made a final exit and settled in the Valley and by
their compact became a member of the Ispocoga body, which they have remained
down to this period.

This remnant of the Natche tribe to this distant day are unfriendly to the French
people. Their antient manners and customs it is said were similar to those of the
Au bih kas, so they had to make no change in their habits of life by their removal.
These statements were handed down to the most antient of the present day by their
forefathers, who were spectators, though in their infancy, of what had happened to and
in their tribe. They have a belief in a supreme being but no worship or adoration.
Though they generally talk about good and bad actions in this life I never could
understand that they had any idea of rewards or punishments in future, for they
generally believe in another life here on a place they can not describe. They keep
the Busk festival in a very devout and sacred manner. Near one of the towns in the
Valley not very far from Soto’s fortification there is a cavern said to be near a quarter
of a mile long and much dissected. Such Indians as have been in it say that it is peo-
pled by fairies. They have never seen any because they have the power of making
themselves imperceptible, but they have seen their tracks and know that they live
on the innumerable bats and swallows that stay in there. It was entered by some men
Inany years since, that is a half century ago. They found the bones of a human being
in the first room and right by him carved in a rock, ‘‘I. W. Wright, 1723”’

816 _ BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (pun. 73

In the beginning of my narrative I said as a prelude I would intersperce an occa-
sional tradition, therefore I will relate one retained by the Natche tribe and related
by them as a matter handed down through successive generations for their information.
I insert it to show in its connection and inference that in olden times their patriarch
knew or heard in some way of the deluge and that the primary information or knowl-
edge he had of it had got blended with traditional fiction. It is said that speech and
rational power was given to man alone and he by his knowledge and understanding
is enabled to make the other creatures subservient to him, so that he rules and man-
ages them in a way most conducive to his will and their comfort in life, but when the
gift of speech is imparted to a dumb creature it is to be observed as a matter of inspira-
tion to the beast purposed by the great spirit to be words of sacred truth from himself
through said creature. As a manifest proof of the foregoing remarks it is said that
there was a large assemblage of the antients on some particular occasion, in times
of yore, when to their surprise they were accosted by a little dog, who, having gaped
and yawned in a particular whining manner, began in articulate words to bemoan
their sudden fate. He called on them individually to look between his ears first
toward sunset and then in every other direction and see their fate. They looked-
accordingly as he said. They could see nothing, but on a second bidding they could
see mountains of water rolling toward them. He bade him who could fly to the moun-
tains for safety and escape death, so they fled. Only a few of them reached the moun-
tains, however, most being overtaken and overwhelmed by the waving torrent of
water. Among them the ‘‘old man of sorrow” was one who escaped by his flight to
the mountains. He is called in their tongue Tam seal hous hous opah.! He uttered
his wailings and lamentations continually, and in tears of sorrow he mourned for all
that perished, and his sorrow likewise extended to the living whom he took under
his care and instrueted them by good words how best to live in future in order to
shun the paths of destruction. The earth was overwhelmed by the billows of water
- and no one survived that did not attain the summit of the mountains. From these
was the earth repeopled. Who this old man of lamentation or sorrow was may be a
question but as I never heard any more of him I shall leave him as I heard of him,
without any conjecture relative to him, to be solved by the inquisitive, and the
antient of days.”

In 1796 the trader in this town was Joseph Stiggins, as above
noted; in 1797 the traders were ‘‘James Quarls,’”’ who had ‘the
character of an honest man,” and ‘Thomas Wilson, a saddler.’’ 3

It_is not generally known that John Stuart, Indian agent under
the British Government, at one time formulated a proposition to
restore these Indians to their old home near Natchez, Mississippi.
His suggestion is outlined in a letter dated December 2, 1766, in the
following terms:

This consideration [that the Choctaw might at any time obstruct the navigation of
the Mississippi] suggested to me the advantage which might arise to His Majesty’s
Service from collecting the Scatter’d Remains of the Natchez and giving them a Set-
tlement in their own Country again. There may be from 150 to 200 Gun Men of them
remaining, in the Cherokee, Creek, and Chickasaw Nations; they still retain their
Language and Customs, as well as the strongest Resentment for the Expulsion and
in a great Measure the Destruction of their Nation by the French.4

1 Tam =dom*, person; seal=sit, big; hous hous opah may be from the stem hd, duplicated, meaning to
howl, or from hac, old, perhaps in the form hachactipa, “is very old,” though I do not have this form
in my material.

2 Stiggins, MS., pp. 7-11.

3 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., rx, pp. 34, 169.

4 English Transcriptions, Lib. Cong.

ines SB; os ay

roi

be DA frre oe te ti 1 BE 8 A) eS FEY.

whe. ee aS

tw”

need wr

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 817
THE SHAWNEE

The earliest known home of the Shawnee was on Cumberland
River. From there some of them moved across to the Tennessee
and established settlements about the Big Bend. As we have seen,
Henry Woodward was a witness, in 1674, to what was probably the
first appearance of members of the tribe on Savannah River.
Although he represents them as settled southwest of that stream near
the Spaniards, it is more likely that the individuals whom he met
belonged on the Cumberland, had been to St. Augustine to trade
with the Spaniards, and were on their return home. Shortly after-
wards a Shawnee band settled near what is now Augusta, and, as
already stated, in 1681! they drove the Westo Indians from that
neighborhood. In 1708 they had three towns on Savannah River,
and the number of their men was estimated at 150,? but in 1715 a
more detailed census gives three towns, 67 men, and 233 souls.’

Before even the first of these enumerations, however, a part of
the Shawnee had moved north to join their relatives from the Ohio
and Cumberland who had settled in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania,
about 15 years before. These latter belonged to the Piqua band, and
the association of the southern Shawnee Indians with them led
Mooney to state that the Shawnee in Carolina belonged to both the
Piqua and Hathewekela,® but there is no absolute proof of this, and
it is more likely that all the Piqua came directly from the Cumber-
land. There is some doubt as to the time when the first Shawnee
moved from Carolina into Pennsylvania, yet we are able to fix upon
the probable period. In the first place, Lawson, in his History of
Carolina, published in 1709, says that the ‘‘Savannas Indians”’ had
formerly lived on the banks of the Mississippi ‘‘and removed thence
to the head of one of the rivers of South Carolina [the Savannah],
since which, for some dislike, most of them are removed to live in the
quarters of the Iroquois or Sinnagars [Seneca], which are on the heads
of the rivers that disgorge themselves into the bay of Chesapeak.’’®

In June, 1707, Gov. John Evans of Pennsylvania visited the
Shawnee Indians on the Susquehanna and states that, while he was
at their village—
several of the Shawnee Indians from the southward came to settle here, and were
admitted to so do by Opessah, with the governor’s consent; at the same time an
Indian from a Shawnee town near Carolina came in, and gave an account that 450 of

the Flat Head (Catawba) Indians had besieged them, and that in all probability the
same was taken. Bezallion (a Trader, who acted as interpreter) informed the Governor

1 See p. 307. 5 Handbook of Amer. Inds., Bull. 30, Bur. Amer.
25.C. Pub. Docs., v, pp. 207-209, MS. Ethn., pt. 2, Article ‘‘Shawnee.”’
3 Rivers, Hist. S. C., p. 94. 6 Lawson, Hist. Car., pp. 279-270.

4 Hanna, The Wilderness Trail, 1, pp. 119-160.

318 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

that the Shawnees of Carolina, he was told, had killed several Christians; whereupon
the government of that province had raised the said Flat Head Indians, and joined
some Christians to them, besieged, and have taken, as it is thought, the said Shawnee
town.’

It is probable that the numbers of those Carolina Shawnee who had
migrated to Pennsylvania were constantly swollen. In 1715; as a
result of the Yamasee war, a part of the Shawnee on Savannah River
moved to the Chattahoochee, settling apparently near where Fort
Gaines is now located. The rest either remained in their old towns
until about 1731 or began moving north immediately. All we know
with certainty is that they were in Pennsylvania by October of the
latter year, as the following testimony demonstrates:

On October 29, 1731, two traders, named Jonah Davenport and
James Le Tort, furnished detailed information to the governor of
Pennsylvania regarding the number of Indians in the Alleghany
country, and this testimony contams the following item:

Assiwikales: 50 families; lately from 8S. Carolina to Ptowmack, and from thence
thither; making 100 men. Aqueloma, their chief, true to the English.?

On an earlier page he enumerates these people as if they were
distinct from the Shawnee. As a matter of fact they were the prin-
cipal Shawnee division in the south, and according to recent informa-
tion gathered by Doctor Michelson would seem to have been con-
sidered first in rank.

In order to reach Pennsylvania the Piqua seem, as Hanna suggests,
to have ascended the Ohio or Cumberland and then to have crossed
to the headwaters of the Potomac by “the Virginia Valley, the
Kanawha, or the Youghiogheny,’* Part of them occupied towns
on the upper course of the Potomac for a time, while the remainder
kept on eastward to the Susquehanna. As these upper Potomac
towns appear to be apart from and to one side of the Shawnee towns
reported near Winchester, Va., the latter may have marked a stage
in the northward movement of the Carolina Shawnee. The following
information regarding the Winchester settlements is contained in
Kercheval’s History of the Valley of Virginia:

The Shawnee tribe, it is well known, were settled about the neighborhood of Win-
chester. Whatare called the ‘‘Shawnee cabins” and ‘‘Shawnee springs” immediately
adjoining the town is well known. It is also equally certain that this tribe had a con-
siderable village, on Babb’s marsh, some three or four miles northwest of Winchester.*

Of course, which band of Shawnee was actually settled here can
not as yet be demonstrated. Those who went to the Chattahoochee
probably remained there very few years, since we soon hear of them
among the Upper Creeks. Another band of Shawnee came from the

1 Hanna, The Wilderness Trail, 1, pp. 150-151; 8 Thid., p. 158.

Day, Hist. Coll. State of Pa., p. 391. 4 Kercheval, Hist. Val. of Va., p. 58.
_ 2 Hanna, The Wilderness Trail, 1, p. 296.

——See ee re

ix Ps “hf ym Y
, x ,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 8319

north about this time, but whether the two belonged to the same
Shawnee subdivision we do not know. These were evidently the
Indians encountered by Adair in the year 1747 on their way south.!
According to Draper these Shawnee made asettlement in the northern
part of the Creek Nation, and after a few years returned to the Ohio
without going farther south. Adair himself speaks of the Shawnee
“who settled between the Ooe-asa and Koosah towns.’”’? Some Chick-
asaw legends regarding the movement of these people to the Creeks
and back is given in another place.‘

At any rate several distinct Shawnee settlements existed among
the Upper Creeks at the same time. In 1752 and the year following
there was a Shawnee town not far from Coosa River, apparently in
the country of the Abihka Indians. In fact, some maps show two
settlements of the tribe here, one of which is called ‘“Cayomulgi,”’
which is evidently the “Kiamulgatown”’ of the census list of 1832.5
No town of the name is now remembered; perhaps it was the Creek
name for the Shawnee town, which had by the whites been applied
to a later Creek settlement. Hawkins gives “Kiomulgee”’ as the
name of the upper part of Natchez or Tallasee Hatchee Creek, which
extends toward Sylacauga.® This would agree well with the location
of a town on the Purcell map (pl. 7) called Mulberry Tree, not other-
wise identified. It should be noted that the Creek word for mul-
berry is kit while omulga signifies all.

In the French census of 1760 there appear among the Creeks two
Shawnee towns of 50 men each. One was evidently the settlement
just mentioned, which is called Chalakagay, perhaps intended for
Sylacauga, a name which indicates in Creek a place where buz-
zards are plentiful—and the other is meant for ‘Little Shawnee.’’
The latter is placed within 3 leagues of Fort Toulouse.” In the census
of 1761 we find only the latter settlement, “Savanalis opposite toMuck-
lassee or shaircula savanalis.”” ‘‘Shaircula”’ is probably intended for
Hathawekela. It then numbered 30 hunters and had as agents Wil-
liam Trewin and Crook & Co.2 Bartram includes this in his list of Creek
towns, but confounds its inhabitants with the Yuchi.® Swan gives a
town bearing the Shawnee name and states that Kan-hatki was also
occupied by Indians of this tribe@® I have elsewhere shown that, on

_ this latter point, he is in error.

In 1797 Hawkins states that the trader here was ‘‘John Haigue,

commonly called Savannah Jack,’’ evidently a mixed blood.* In his

sketch he has the following to say regarding it:

1 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., pp. 2-3. 6 Ga. Hist. Soc., Colls. rx, p. 34.

3 Hanna, The Wilderness Trail, m1, pp. 240-242. 7 Miss. Prov. Arch., p. 96.

8 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., pp. 155-156. 8 Ga. Col. Does., Vm, p. 523.

4See pp. 414-416. 9 Bartram, Travels, pp. 462, 464.

5 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., pp. 302-309; 10 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 262.
Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, rv, p. 578. ll Ga. Hist. Soc. Cells., Ix, p. 169.

320 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73 ©

Sau-wa-no-gee is on a pine flat,’ three miles below Le-cau-suh, and back from a
swamp bordering on the river; their fields are on both sides of the river, but mostly
on the left bank, between the swamp and the river, on a vein of rich canebreak land;
they are the Shaw-a-ne, and retain the language and customs of their countrymen
to the northwest, and aided them in their late war with the United States. Some
Uchees have settled with them; they are industrious, work with their women, and
make plenty of corn; they have no cattle, and but few horses and hogs; the town
house is an oblong square cabin, roof eight feet pitch, the sides and roof covered with ~
the bark of the pine; on the left ofthe river.”

The tribe does not appear in the census list of 1832 unless it may
be concealed under the appellation ‘‘Kiamulgatown” above men-
tioned.? At what time the Shawnee separated definitely from the
Creeks I do not know, but it was as early as the time of the removal,
although their reservations in the west adjoined and the Shawnee
and Creeks retained their old-time intimacy.

THE ANCIENT INHABITANTS OF FLORIDA
History

Most of the tribes considered hitherto had had very intimate
relations with the Creek Confederacy, the central object of our in-
vestigation. We now come to peoples who remained for the most
part distinct from the Creeks, but whose history nevertheless occu-
pies an important place in the background of this study—first,
because they were near neighbors and had dealings with them, usu-
ally of a hostile character, for a long period, and, secondly, because
their country was later the home of the Seminole, an important
Creek offshoot which must presently receive consideration. These
were the ancient inhabitants of Florida. I have already called atten-
tion to the distinction which existed between the Timucua of northern
and central Florida and the south Florida tribes below Tampa Bay and
Cape Canaveral,‘ and I will discuss the geographical distribution and
subdivisions of each separately before proceeding to their history
proper.

When we first become acquainted with the Timucua Indians
through the medium of French explorers.we find a great number of
towns combined into groups under certain powerful chiefs. It is
probable that all of these groups, like the ‘‘empire” of Powhatan,
were by no means permanent, yet some of the tribes remained domi-
nant throughout Timucua history and gave their names to mis-
sionary provinces. The French speak of about five of these associ-
ations or confederacies. That of Saturiwa, or that headed by Satu-
riwa—for it is uncertain whether the name belonged properly to a
tribe or a chief—was on both sides of the lower St. Johns and seems
to have included Cumberland Island. The Timucua proper, or Utina,

1 The published edition has ‘‘forest.’’ 8 Senate Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., IV, pp.
2 Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., M1, pp. 34-85; 302-303.
Ix, p. 41. 4See pp 27-31.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 321

centered about Santa Fe Lake, but extended eastward across the
St. Johns. The Potano were apparently on the Alachua plains, but
sometimes Potano province is made to reach eastward to the At-
lantic, and to include the ‘‘Fresh Water’ province. Northwest of the
Potano, and borderimg on the Apalachee country, were the provinces
of Onatheaqua and Hostaqua (or Yustaga).

In the Spanish period our information becomes more detailed,
owing largely to the labors of the Franciscan missionaries. Utina,
Potano, and Hostaqua or Yustaga, are still recognized as important
provinces, but Onatheaqua has disappeared, and it is difficult to tell
just what province corresponds to the old overlordship of Saturiwa.
Yustaga is mentioned in one letter as though it were independent of
and coordinate with Timucua. Tacatacuru, or Cumberland Island, is
certainly independent. The mission field to the south is divided be-
tween San Juan del Puerto at the mouth of St. Johns River and St.
Augustine. However, according to one account, Dofia Maria, chief-
tainess of Nombre de Dios de Florida, close to the latter place, was
ruler over San Juan del Puerto, so that the territory governed by
her may have been the old domain of Saturiwa. Inland from Taca-
tacuru, known to the Spaniards as San Pedro, were two independent
Timucua provinces called Yui (Ibi, Iuy) and Icafi or Icafui. There
is some confusion about this last, because the missionaries seem to
speak of it as identical with Cascangue or Cascange, while this latter
is often referred to as a Guale tribe, and it took part in the uprising
of 1597. Probably we have to deal with two peoples, one Timucua,
the other Guale, living close together.

South of St. Augustine was a group of towns classed together in
what the Spaniards called the Fresh Water district, which seems to
have been placed by some in the Potano province. It was long and
narrow; Maiaca, the farthest town, was 8 leagues from Tocoy, the
nearest. In the minds of some there was a doubt as to whether this
last belonged properly to the province or not. Toward Cape Cana-
veral was a tribe called Surruque, Curruque, or by some similar name.
It is probably the Serropé mentioned by Laudonniére, although he
places it on a large lake inland. By the large lake we must under-
stand the lagoons back of Canaveral. Surruque may be classed pro-
visionally as Timucua, though there is no certainty. Tocobaga was
a province between Tampa Bay and Withlacoochee River, Ocale a
province north of the Withlacoochee, and Acuera inland to the east
of the latter. In De Soto’s time there seems to have been a town or
province of considerable importance called Aguacaleyquen between
the Santa Fe and the upper Suwanee.

Below is a practically complete list of Florida missions and Timucua
provinces, tribes, towns, and chiefs, so far as they have been revealed
to us by the early writers

148061°—2221

322

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY

[ BULL. 73

FLORIDA MISSIONS

List or 1655

List or 1680 a

PROVINCIA DE GUALE Y MOCAMO

Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe.

San Juan del Puerto, en la costa
San Pedro Mocama.

San Buenaventura de Boadalquivi.

Santo Domingo de Talaje.

San Josef de Zapala.

Santiago de Ocone, isla.

Santa Catarina de Guale, y es la principal
de esta provincia de Guale.

San Felipe.

Chatuache, y es la ultima por la costa del
Norte.

Nuestra Sefiora de Guadalupe de Tolo-
mato.
Sefior San Juan del Puerto.

Sefior San Felipe de Athuluteca (given
in 1643 as San Pedro Atuluteca).

Sefior San Buenaventura de Ovadal-
quini.

Sefior Santo Domingo de Assaho.

Senor San Joseph de Capala.

Sefiora Santa Cathalina de Guale.

PROVINCIA DE TIMUCUA

La doctrina del pueblo de Nombre de
Dios.

San Salvador de Macaya.
San Antonio de Nacape.

San Francisco Patano [Potano].
Santa Fe de Toloco.

Santa Cruz de Tarica.

San Pedro y San Pablo de Poturiba.
Santa Elena de Machaba.

San Miguel de Asile.

San Agustin de Urica.

Santa Maria de los Angeles de Arapaja.

Santa Cruz de Cachipile.

San Francisco de Chuaquin.

San Ildefonso de Chamini.

San Martin de Ayaocuto.

San Luis, de la provincia de Acuera, al
Sur.

Santa Lucia, idem.

San Diego de Laca.

Nombre de Dios de Amacarisse.

Sefior San Diego de Ecalamototo.

Senor Salvador de Maiaca, converssion
nueva.

Sefior San Antonio de Anacape, convers-
sion nueva. ~

Sefior San Francisco de Potano.

Sefior Santo Thomas de Santa Fee.

Sefiora Santa Cathalina de Ahoica.

Santa Cruz de Tharihica.

Sefior San Juan de Guacara.

Sefior San Pedro de Pothohiriva.

Sefiora Santa Helena de Machava,

Sefior San Matheo de Tolapatafi.

Sefior San Miguel de Assile.

a) i ee

ae Tot abn Sl amemel

pate

awypsrge 8

3 Rep a Eom

View

er.

NR See ae ee eee
é t

< dios tear di a ae ie

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 323

PROVINCIA DE APALACHE

San Lorenzo de Apalache. Senor San Lorengo de Ybithachucu.
La Concepcion de Apalache. Nuestra Senora de La Purissima Congep-
gion de Ajubali.

San Francisco de Apalache. Senor San Frangisco de Oconi.

San Juan de Apalache. Senor San Joan de Ospalaga.

San Josef de Apalache. Senor San Joseph de Ocuia.

San Pedro y San Pablo de Kpal [evi- | Senores San Pedro y San Pablo de Patali.
dently Apal].

Senor San Antonio de Bacuqua.

San Cosme y San Damian. Senores San Cosme y San Damian de
Yecambi.
/ Sefior San Carlos de los Chacatos, conver-

sion nueva.
San Luis de Apalache. Sefior San Luis de Talimali.
Nuestra Senora de la Candelaria de la
Tama, conversion nueva.
Sefior San Pedro de los Chines, conver-
sion nueva.
San Martin de Apalache. Sefior San Martin de Tomoli.
Santa Cruz y San Pedro de Alcantara de
Ychutafun.
Coaba, en la cordillera de Apalache.

TIMUCUA PROVINCES, TRIBES, TOWNS, AND CHIEFS

Asino. This town and two othersnamed Tucuro and Utiaca were said to be 40 leagues
inland from St. Augustine, four days’ journey, and to be 14 to 2 leagues apart.
Their country is mentioned as a good agricultural region.

Acanono. One of the chiefs living inland from San Pedro, who met Ibarra in 1604.

Acassa. A town inland from Tampa Bay.

Aceta. See Vicela.

Acugera, AqueraA, Acquera, AGuERA. An important province somewhere near the
upper course of the Ocklawaha River. In 1655 it was the seat of a Franciscan
mission called San Luis, and there was another mission there known as Santa
Lucia.

Acie. See Assile.

AGUACALECUEN, AGUACALEYQUEN, CALIQUEN. A town and province visited by De
Soto. Itseems to have lain between the Suwanee and its branch, the Santa Fe.

Anoica. <A town which gave its name to the mission of Santa Cathalina de Ahoica,
which seems to have been somewhere near the Santa Fe River.

AracHeroyo. A town inland from Tampa Bay.

Auatico, OLatayco. A town belonging to the province of San Pedro or Tacatacuru.
The name is probably from holata, chief, and hica, town settlement.

ALIMACANI, ALLIMACANY, HaAtMACANIR, AtimAcANY. An island and town not far to
the north of the mouth of St. Johns River.

Amaca. A town inland from Tampa Bay.

AmacarisseE. A mission of the province of Timucua existing in 1655 is called Nombre
de Dios de Amacarisse. This was settled by Yamasee, and its name is prob-
ably the original of the name Yamacraw.

Awnacape, Nacare, ANAcaBiLA. A town in the Fresh Water province which gave its
name to the mission of San Antonio de Anacape (1655). It was 20 leagues south
of St. Augustine. Reckoning them in their order from St. Augustine southward
the Fresh Water towns were: Tocoy, Antonico(?), St. Julian, Filache, Equale,
Anacape, Maiaca. Yamasee were settled here in 1680.

824 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

AnacHARAQua. A place mentioned by Laudonniére.

Anronico, ATonico, possibly also called Tunsa. One of the Fresh Water towns.
The name is probably Spanish. (See Anacape.)

Apatu, Apatou, Hapatuya. A town mentioned by the De Soto chroniclers and Lau-
donniére. It was in the northwestern part of the Timucua country near O¢a-
chile and in the province of Hostaqua. The name means ‘‘fort” in Timucua.

AquErRA. See Acuera.

ArapasA, Harpana. This place gave its name to the mission of Santa Marfa de los
Angeles de Arapaja, which was 70 leagues from St. Augustine, probably north-
west.

Araya. A placein Florida south of the Withlacoochee.

ArcuaHa. A place mentioned by Laudonniére.

Assitz, Acite, Axttue, AGum, OcHILE, OctLtLta, Aste. An important town in the
westernmost part of the Timucua country. It gave its name to the mission of
San Miguel de Assile-and to the River Ocilla.

Astiva. Given by Laudonniére as the name of a chief and town.

Arututeca. A town which gave its name to the mission of San Felipe de Athuluteca.
This is called in another place San Pedro de Atuluteca. It was probably near
San Pedro or Cumberland Island.

AYACAMALE. There is a single reference to this town in one of the Lowery MSS.

Ayaocuto. It gave its name to the mission of San Martin de Ayaocuto. The chief
of this town was leader in the Timucua insurrection of 1656.

AysBe. See Yui.

Ayorore, ATHORE. Governor Ibarra gives this town as one of those in the country
inland from San Pedro but subject to the chieftainess of SORES de Dios.
Laudonniére seems to place it nearer the St. Johns.

Brca, Veca. Mentioned among the towns whose chiefs came to “ give their obedience”’
to Governor de Cango.

Brcao. Mentioned in the same connection as the last.

Besest. Mentioned once in the Lowery MSS. Possibly the Apalachee town of
Wacissa.

Cacuirite. This town gave its name to a mission, Santa Cruz de Cachipile, in 1655.

Qacoroy, Zacoroy. A town south of St. Augustine, 14 leagues from Nocoroco.

CapEcHA. One of the towns reported to the French in 1565 as allied with Utina.

CaLaBAY. See Sarauahi.

CaLAny. A town reported to the French in 1565 to be allied with Utina.

Cate. See Ocale.

CaLIQuEN. See Aguacalecuen.

CaNogacota. A warlike tribe near the Suwanee mentioned by Fontaneda. I be-
lieve these were the Potano. (See pp. 29-30.)

CapaLoEy. Ranjel records this as the name of a chief near Tampa Bay.

CAPARACA, CAapoaca, Xapurca(?). A town southwest of Nocoroco and south of St.
Augustine.

CascaNGuE. See Icafi.

Casti. Given by Laudonniére as a Timucua town.

Cayuco. A town near Tampa Bay.

CHamini. A town that gave its name to the mission of San Ildefonso de Chamini.

Cum. See (ilili.

Cumaucayo. A town south of St. Augustine.

Cuinica, Curntsca. A town 1} leagues from San Juan del Puerto, and attached to it
as a mission station.

CuotupaHA. A Florida town reached by De Soto just before he came to Aguacaley-
quen.

Cuuaquin, A town which gave its name to the mission of San Francisco de Chuaquin.

wate

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 825

QIcaLE, CIcaALE, QicaL, Sicate. A town south of St. Augustine and 3 leagues south
of Nocoroco.

CiauacHe. See Siyagueche.

Crum, Cami, Cammy. A town mentioned by Laudonniére and by one of the older
Spanish chroniclers.

Cotucucuta, Cotcunta. A town several leagues south of Nocoroco.

CoRRUQUE, CORROUQUE, CURRUCHE, CURRUQUEY, CURRUQUE. See Surruque.

Coya. A Florida town mentioned by Laudonniére.

Disnica. A town given in the Lowery MSS. and probably south of St. Augustine. It
may be miscopied as d is rarely found in Timucua names.

DuicHaNCHELLIN. A chief met by Narvaez in the western Timucua country.
(See p. 334.)

Egatamototro. A town which gave its name to the mission of San Diego de E¢ala-
mototo (1680).

Egrra. Given by Ranjel asa chief and perhaps town near Tampa Bay, in 1539. It
may be a variant of Ocita (q. v.).

Eciavov. A town mentioned by Laudonniére, 1565.

Epretano, Lano. An island in St. Johns River and a town on the same.

Exasay. An old field. It may have been the site of Elafay. (See next list, p. 332.)

Exanoaue. A town in the Fresh Water province, near Antonico.

Emoxa. A town mentioned by Laudonniére.

ENneEcAQUE, ENAcArPPE, ENEGUAPE. A town mentioned by Laudonniére.

Equate, Locuate. A town in the Fresh Water country, fifth in order from St. Augus-
tine.

Ereze. A town inland from Tampa Bay.

Esqureaa. A chief whose province, according to an early Spanish document, lay
on the west coast of Florida between those of Pebe and Osigubede.

Erocate. See Ocale.

Exancue. A town in the neighborhood of San Pedro (Tacatacuru).

Frmacue. A town in the Fresh Water province, the fourth in order from St. Augustine.

Guacara. A town which gave its name to the mission of San Juan de Guacara. It
took part in the Timucua rising of 1656; subsequently it was occupied by
Apalachee.

Guagoco. A plain, and probably a town, in the Tocobaga country. Recorded by
Ranjel.

Guatutma. An Indian of rank belonging to Aguacalecuen. Mentioned by Ranjel.

Harmacantr. See Alimacani.

Hapatuya. See Apalu.

Harpana. See Arapaja.

Hewrocorite. A chief and town mentioned by Laudonniére.

Hermacare. A chief and town mentioned by Laudonniére.

Hicacuirico. A town 1 league from San Juan del Puerto, the missionary at which
point visited it.

Hrocara. A chief, and probably a town, mentioned by Laudonniére.

Homo.oa, Homotona. See Moloa.

Horrvuaue. See Surruque.

Hostaqua, Hostraqur, Houstaqua, Yustaca, Yustaqua, Ustaaa, Ustraqua,
OstaGca. A province in the northwestern part of the Timucua country border-
ing on the Apalachee. Itseems to have consisted of a number of towns or small
tribes, probably not always under one government. That there were some
differences between these people and the rest of the Timucua appears to be indi-
cated by one of the early writers who speaks of ‘‘the provinces of Ustaqua and
Timuqua.”’

396 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73 _

Hvuara. A town inland from San Pedro. The chief was summoned by Ibarra to meet
him in San Pedro.

Hurripacuxi. See Orriparacogi.

IcarI, ICAFUI, ycarur. A Timucua province identical with or confused with Cas-
cangue. It lay on the border between the Timucua and Guale provinces,
apparently on the mainland, and comprised seven or eight towns. It was
visited by the missionary at San Pedro.

ITaARAHOLATA, YTARA. A small town abounding in corn which De Soto entered one
day before he reached Potano. (For the meaning of holata see Alatico.)

Juraya. A rancheria in Florida, about 7 leagues from Utina Paja hacienda.

Laca. A town which gave its name to the mission of San Diego de Laca (1655), 7
leagues from St. Augustine.

LamaLe. A town inland from San Pedro. The chief came to see Ibarra in 1604.

Lano. See Edelano.

LoquaLe. See Equale.

Luca. A town visited by DeSoto. It was between Tampa Bay and the Withlacoochee
River.

MacuaBa, Macuava, Macnaaua. A town which gave its name to the mission of
Santa Elena de Machaba. It was inland near the northern border of the Timu-
cua country.

Maraca. A town which gave its name to the mission of San Salvador de Maiaca (1680).
What is probably the same town appears in the mission list of 1655 as San
Salvador de Macaya. We also find a town the name of which is spelled Maycoya
or Mayeguia. Either two towns have been confused or the letters in one name
transposed. Maiaca was the most distant from St. Augustine of all the Fresh
Water towns. It was a few leagues north of Cape Canaveral, on St. Johns
River. Laudonniére also spells the name Mayarque and Maquarqua.

Margera. See Mayara.

Mataca, Matica. A town south of St. “Augustine and Nocoroco., Evidently the
Malica of Laudonniére.

Matann, See Perquymaland.

Marracovu. A chief and town mentioned by Laudonniére.

Maruraqua, OmiTraqua. A chief and town mentioned by Laudonniere.

Mayaca. See Maiaca.

Mayasuaca, Maysuaca. A town near Maiaca, for which Fontaneda is the principal
authority.

Mayara, Mayrra, Margera. A town and chief of the lower St. Johns River mentioned
by Laudonniere.

Mocama. The mission on Cumberland Island was called San Pedro Mocama, and
Mocama may have been the native name of the town, but the name may also
have been transferred from the SE gure which was called the province
of Mocama. The word means ‘‘on the sea.’

Mocogo, Moaquoso, Mocoso. A province of considerable importance north of Tampa
Bay and apparently on Hillsborough River. It is mentioned by the De Soto
chroniclers, Laudonniére, and other explorers.

Mocorr. A town south of St. Augustine in the region of Nocoroco.

Motoa, Monova, Moto, Motona, Mottona, Homotoa, Homoxous, Omouoa, MoToa.
A town mentioned by Laudonniére and some early Spanish writers, on the
south side of St. Johns River, near its mouth. De Gourgues places one of
similar name 60 leagues inland on the same river. It is probably identical
with the Motoa mentioned by Ibarra as a chief and town near San Juan del
Puerto at the mouth of the St. Johns River. An early Spanish document
speaks of this town, or its chief, as ‘‘Moloa the brave.” It was later a mission
station 5 leagues from San Juan del Puerto.

Nacailr. See Anacape.

POR QO POR ea wren

FEE GE OT TIP FRI 24

. ms

etc? ®

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS O27

Nacuarete. A chief in the country between Tampa Bay and the Withlacoochee

& River, mentioned by Ranjel.

Napa, Napuica, Napuyca (hica means town or settlement). An island, village,
and mission station 1 league from San Pedro. A mission station called Santo
Domingo was in this island and in or near it Santa Maria de Sena.

Napituca, Napreraca. A village apparently in the province of Aguacalecuen, between
the Suwanee and Santa Fe Rivers. Ranjel describes it as ‘‘a very pleasant
village, in a pretty spot, with plenty of food.” It was here that the people of
Aguacalecuen endeavored to recover their chief.

Natoso (or Raroso). A mission station 24 leagues from San Juan del Puerto.

Nra Cusacant. A chieftainess mentioned by Laudonniére. Nia is the Timucua word
meaning ‘“‘woman.” No town bore this name.

Nocoroco. A town at the mouth of a river (Halifax River ?) bearing the same name
which was one day’s journey south of Matanzas Inlet.

OcaLe, Ocaty, Cate, EtrocaLe, OLrocate. A province and town which De Soto
passed through. It was north of the Withlacoochee, not far from the present
Ocala.

OcuiLE, Oca. See Assile.

Ogrra, Ucrra. A town at or near the head of Hillsborough Bay, where De Soto landed.

Oxrata OvaE Utina. Full name of the head chief of Utina or Timucua, according
to Laudonniére.

Ouatrayco. See Alatico.

OtoeaLe. See Ocale.

Otoracara. A Florida chief prominent in the account of the De Gourgues expedi-
tion.

Omitraqua. See Mathiaqua.

Omotoa. See Moloa.

OnaTHAQUA. Mentioned by Laudonniére as a tribe or town near Cape Canaveral.

ONATHEAQUA. Given by Laudonniére as the name of a province in the northwestern
part of Florida bordering on the Apalachee.

Orrpia, OrtBE. See Urubia.

ORRIPARACOGI, ORRIPARAGI, URRIPARACOXI, PARACOXI, Hurripacuxi, URRIBARA-
cuxi, Urrrpacoxir. A chief and province spoken of by the De Soto chroni-
clers. It was inland, northeast of Tampa Bay.

Orriyeua. Given by Ranjel as the name of a chief living north of Tampa Bay.

OsIQUEVEDE, OsIGUBEDE. A province mentioned by Fontaneda south of Apalachee
(see p. 30).

OssacHite. See Ucachile.

Ostaca. See Hostaqua.

PanarA. One of the towns lying inland from San Pedro; the chief came to meet
Ibarra in 1604.

Paracoxi. See Orriparacogi.

Parca. This town name appears in one document. The spelling is somewhat in
doubt.

Patica. A town mentioned by Laudonniére, on the seacoast 8 leagues south of St.
Johns River. Another town of the same name was on the west bank of the St.
Johns in the territory of the Timucua tribe. Le Moyne spells the latter
Patchica. An early Spanish document spells the name Palica.

Perse. Given in an early Spanish manuscript as the name of a chief on the west
coast of Florida between Cafiogacola and Esquega.

Pentoaya. Name of a town at the head of the River of Ais.

PERQUYMALAND. This seems to be given as a town south of St. Augustine and
Nocoroco, but it is doubtful whether the name has been copied correctly.
There may be two names here, the original being ‘‘Perqui y Maland.’’

328 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [put. 73

Pra. A town on the east coast south of St. Augustine and Nocoroco.

Pirano. A mission station a league or half a league from San Pablo (Puturiba).

Pryaya. Given in an early Spanish manuscript as the name of a chief on the west
coast of Florida between Osigubede and Tanpacaste.

Pooy, Posoy. Mentioned in a Spanish document of 1612 as a town or province situ-
ated on a certain bay. The document says: ‘‘The best bay [on the south-
western coast of Florida] is the bay of Pooy, which is where the Indians say
Hernando de Soto disembarked.’’ This is Tampa Bay or that part of it known
as Hillsborough Bay. A letter of 1625 mentions a province called Posoy, which
is probably identical with this. In 1680 a Calusa province is referred to
called Rojoi, said to contain a population of non-Christian Indians numbering
300. Rojoi is probably a misspelling of Pojoi (=Pojoy).

Porano, Poranou, Parano. One of the most important provinces or tribes in Flor-
ida and seemingly the most warlike. It was in the Alachua plains and was
later the seat of the mission of San Francisco de Potano.

Potaya. A town and mission station 4 leagues from San Juan del Puerto.

Potoyoroya. A carry back of Cape Canaveral, where the Indians moved their canoes
across from one lagoon to another.

Puata. A town in the neighborhood of San Pedro, whose chief came to see Gov.
Ibarra in 1604.

Punuurr. A town inland from San Pedro, whose chief came to see Ibarra in 1604.

Pururrpa, Porurrea, Pororra, Pornoutriva, Porocirrera. A town and mis-
sionary seat which seems to have been located on San Pedro (Cumberland)
Island near its northern end. The river which separated the provinces of
Timucua and Guale, and which was probably the Satilla, bore its name. The
chief of this town was among the insurgents of 1656. The mission was called
San Pedro y San Pablo de Puturiba.

Ratoso. See Natobo.

SaBoscue, SavovocHEQuEyA. A town near the east coast south of St. Augustine
and Nocoroco.

[Sr. Jut1an.] One of the Fresh Water towns, the third from St. Augustine. The
native name is not preserved, or at least not identified.

Satrvacant. Given by Laudonniére as the name of a Florida river; probably a
misprint of Halimacani (see Alimacani).

[San Mareo.] A village about 2 leagues from San Juan del Puerto.

[San Pasto.] A village about 14 leagues from San Juan del Puerto. To be distin-
guished from San Pedro y San Pablo de Poturiba (see Puturiba).

[San SEBASTIAN.] A town on an arm of the sea near St. Augustine, destroyed
about 1600 by a flood.

SARAUAHI, SARAURAHI, SARACARY, SERRANAY, SARABAY, CARABAY, CALABAY. Ap-
parently the name of Nassau River and a town a quarter of a league from San
Juan del Puerto.

Saturtwa, SaTurrua, SaTuRIoNA, SaTurrBA, Satoriva, Sororipa. One of the
leading chiefs in Laudonniére’s time, and his province. It is scarcely men-
tioned by the Spaniards. The province lay on both sides of the St. Johns at
its mouth. Dofia Maria, a leading supporter of the Spaniards, whose town was
close to St. Augustine, probably ruled over the Saturiwa territories in later
times.

Setoy. See Soloy.

Sena. I do not know whether this is a native or a Spanish word. A mission not
appearing in the regular lists was known as Santa Maria de Sena. Possibly
this is intended for Sienna. It was on an inlet north of the mouth of the St.
Johns, perhaps Amelia River.

Sicate. See Cicale.

SWANTON] ‘EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 899

SryacueEcuHeE, CiauacHe. A town near Cape Canaveral.

Sococuuno. A town mentioned in one of the early Spanish documents.

Sotoy. A town not farfrom St. Augustine. It was probably on the river called by
the French Seloy and Seloy is probably a variant form of the word.

SuRRUQUE, SURRUCHE, SURRUCLE, SERRALLI, CORRUQUE, CORROUQUE, CURRUCHE,
CURRUQUEY, SURUDE, CURRUQUE, URRUCLE, HoRRUQUE, ZORRUQUE. A town
or tribe at Cape Canaveral. It is probably the Sorrochos of Le Moyne’s map
and I believe also the original of his Sarropé. Lake Sarropéis probably placed
too far to the south and too far inland. The French knew of it only by hearsay.

TACATACURU, TACADOCOROU, TACATACOURU, TECATACOUROU, TAcuRURU. The na-
tive name for Cumberland Island, later known to the Spaniards as San Pedro.
It may also have been the ancient name of the chief town, the seat of the mis-
sion of San Pedro Mocamo, which was situated on the inner side of Cumberland
Island near the southern end and 2 leagues from the Barra of San Pedro.

TarocoLe. <A town inland from Tampa Bay.

Tanupa. A town inland from San Pedro, whose chief came to visit Ibarra in 1604.

TANPACASTE. Given in an old Spanish document as a chief between Piyaya on the
north and Pooy on the south.

Tarrinica, TArrxicA, THARIHICA, TARICA. A town 54 leagues from St. Augustine
which gave its name to the mission of Santa Cruz de Tarihica. It was one of
the 11 towns which rebelled in 1656.

Timucua, Tuimocoa. Name of the largest confederacy or tribe in Florida, also called
Utina. It has givenits name to a group of tribes speaking similar dialects, the
Timuquanan linguistic stock. With the possible exception of the Potano it was
the most powerful tribe as well as the largest. The center of its domain was
about Santa Fe Lake and its overlordship or dominance extended to the eastern
shores of the St. Johns.

Tocastr. A village which De Soto passed through. Itwas on a large lake some dis-
tance south of the Withlacoochee.

Tocoaya, TocoHaya, Tocoya. A town very close to San Pedro, Cumberland Island.
Its chief was one of those who met Ibarra at the latter place in 1604.

TocopaGca, TocovaGca, Tocospaa, Tocopaca, TopopaGca. A chief and province fre-
quently mentioned in Spanish documents but not by- De Soto or the later
writers. It was on the west coast and one old document places it, probably
erroneously, between the province of Mogoso on the north and that of Canoga-
cola on the south. The chief town was at the head of one of the arms of
Tampa Bay.

Tocoy, Tocor. <A town of the Fresh Water district, the nearest of all to St. Augustine,
from which it was 5 leagues distant, according to one writer, and 24 according
to another.

Totapatari. A town which gave its name to one of the later Florida missions, San
Matheo de Tolapatafi. Itseems to have been in the western part of the Timucua
country, near Assile.

Totoco. A town from which the mission of Santa Fede Tolocoreceived its name. It
is perhaps the Santo Thomas de Santa Fee of the mission list of 1680.

Tomeo. A town apparently in the neighborhood of the Fresh Water province.

Tucura. A town apparently in the same province as the above.

Tucuro. Oneof three towns 40 leaguesfrom St. Augustine. See Abino. This may
be identical with the above, though the distance seems to be against such a
supposition.

Tunsa. See Antonico.

Ucacuite, Uzacui, Ossacniie, VEACHILE. This has been discussed in full in dealing
with the Osochi tribe. (See p. 165.)

Ucira. See Ocita.

330 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Urera. See Yufera,

Unumay. A province and town just south of Cape Canaveral. There is reason to
think that it belonged to the province of Ais rather than to the Timucua country.

UaueteN. Ranjel gives this as the name of the first village of the province of Ocale.

Urica. A town which gave its name to the mission of San Augustin de Urica (1655).

Uriutina. Ranjel describes this as ‘‘a village of pleasant aspect and abundant food.”
It was passed by De Soto just after crossing the river of Aguacalecuen.

Urripacoxit, URRIBARACUXI, URRIPARACOXI. See Orriparacogi.

Urrucie. See Surruque.

Urusia, Urruya, Orreia, Orrpe. A town near Cape Canaveral, 14 leagues from the
town of Surruque.

Ustaaa, Ustaqua. See Hostaqua.

Urayne. A town inland from San Pedro, whose chief came to see Ibarra in 1604.

Urtaca. A town 40 leagues from St. Augustine. See Abino.

Uricnini. A place evidently situated inland from San Pedro, and within a league or
half a league of San Pablo (Puturiba).

Urtina. A synonym for Timucua, q. v.

Urina Pasa. Timucua name of a Spanish hacienda.

Utinamocuarra, Urinama. A town passed by De Soto one day’s journey north of
Potano.

Uzacuiu. See Ocachile.

VEACHILE. See Ogachile.

Veca. See Beca. 4

[VERA Cruz.] A village half a league from San Juan del Puerto.

Viceta, AcELA. A small town passed through by De Soto a short distance south of
the Withlacoochee.

Xapuica. This occurs in connection with some Guale towns, but the word appears
to be rather Timucua. It may be a synonym for Caparaca, q. v.

XATALALANO. A town inland from San Pedro, whose chief came to see Ibarra in 1604.

Yaocay. A town in the Fresh Water province, near Antonico.

Yoarul. See Icafi.

Ycoapatano. A town inland from San Pedro and said to be within a league or half a
league of the mission of San Pablo, presumably the mission of San Pedro y
San Pablo de Poturiba.

Yrara. See Itaraholata.

Yua. <A town whose chief came ‘‘to give obedience” to Méndez de Can¢o in 1598 or
shortly before. Perhaps this is really Yui.

Yurera, Urera. <A town inland from San Pedro, apparently toward the northwest,
for it was passed through by some missionaries returning to San Pedro from the
upper Altamaha. Its chief was one of those inland chiefs who came to visit
Ibarra in 1604. ;

Yur, Yer, YBy, Ayp1(?). The name of this province should probably be pronounced
Ewe in English. It was a small province on the mainland, consisting of five
towns, and was 14 leagues from San Pedro. It was visited by the missionary
at San Pedro.

Yustaca, Yustaqua. See Hostaqua.

Zacoroy. See QVacoroy.

ZORRUQUE. See Surruque.

All of the Indians of southern Florida on the western side of the
peninsula, from the Timucua territories as far as and including the
Florida Keys, belonged to a confederacy or overlordship called
Calusa or Calos. On the eastern coast were a number of small

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 831

independent tribes, each usually occupying only one settlement.
The most important of these appears to have been Ais, located close
to what is now Indian River Inlet. The next in prominence, if not
in power, were the Tekesta, at or near the present Miami, and between
these were the Jeaga, or Jega, in Jupiter Inlet, and the Guacata and
Santa Lucia Indians, probably identical, who lived about St. Lucie
River. The province of Ais is said to have extended northward
almost to Cape Canaveral, but the authority of its chief was probably
not very great along the northern edge of this area, where we are
told of a province called Ulumay.

We will consider first the towns of Calusa. Two lists of Calusa
towns have come to my notice; one in Fontaneda’s Memoir, the other—
possibly from him also, but containing many more names and some
variants of the names in his Memoir—in the Lowery manuscripts.
From the fact that Tampa is given by Fontaneda as a Calusa town, it
has been quite generally assumed that the Calusa extended as far north
as the bay of that name, but in the Lowery manuscripts I find very
strong evidence that the original Tampa Bay was farther south
than the inlet now so called, and was probably identical with
what is now Charlotte Harbor. The principal Calusa town was
farther south on San Carlos Bay. Fontaneda classifies the Calusa
towns into three groups, those on the west coast of the peninsula,
those about Lake Mayaimi, now Okeechobee, and those on the
Florida Keys. The following list is as complete as I can furnish.
In the list from the Lowery manuscripts the towns, or, as the
document gives it, their caciques—since town and chief were called
by the same name by the Spaniards—are given from north to south,
and I indicate in each case the town above and below the one named,
mentioning the one to the north first. In the case of towns from
Fontaneda’s list I give the group to which each belongs:

Aprr. Between Neguitun and Cutespa.

Atcona (or Coosa). Mentioned in the narrative of an expedition into the Calusa
country in 1680, and said to have 300 people.

Apogota Necra. Thisisgivenin an account of an expedition into the Calusa country
in 1680. The expedition was accompanied by Timucua interpreters and
this name seems to contain the Spanish word black and the Timucua word
for buzzard. It contained 20 people.

CaLAoBe. Belongs to the seacoast division (see p. 29).

CaraGarRA. Between Namuguya and Henhenguepa.

Casiroa, Casirua. Seacoast division. Between Muspa and Cotebo.

CaYovea. Seacoast division.

Cayucar. Between Tonco and Neguitun.

Curt. Between Tomcobe and Taguagemae (or Taguagemue).

Comacuica. Seacoast division.

Cononoauay. Between Cutespa and Estegue.

CoteBo. Between Casitua and Coyobia.

CorosiA. Between Cotebo and Tequemapo.

832 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

CucuryaGa, Cucmiaca, Cuctyyaca. A town of the Florida keys. It was said to be
southwest from Bahia Honda and 40 leagues northeast of Guarungube. Prob-
ably it was on Big Pine Key.

Oustavur. South of Jutun.

CurespA. Inland division. Between Abir and Cononoguay.

Exaray. In the report of an expedition to Calusa in 1680. It had 40 people. The
word may be in the Timucua language.

Enempa. In interior division.

EstaMe. Seacoast division. Between Metamapo and Sacaspada.

EstanTapaca. Between Yagua and Queyhicha.

Estecur. Between Cononoguay and Tomsobe.

Excuru. Between Janar and Metamapo.

GUARUNGUBE, GQUARUGUMBE, GARUNGUNVE. The outermost town on the Florida
keys, ‘‘on the point of the Martyrs,’’ and thus probably near Key West.

GuEVU. Seacoast division.

HENHENGUEPA. Between Caragara and Ocapataga.

JANAR. Between Ocapataga and Escuru.

Jupy1. Between Satucuava and Soco.

JuesrocospaGa. Between Queyhicha and Sinapa.

Jurun. Seacoast division. Between Tequemapo and Custavui.

Mertamapo. Seacoast division. Between Escuru and Estame.

Muspa. Seacoast division. Between Teyo and Casitua.

Namucuya. Between Taguagemae and Caragara.

Necurrun. Between Cayucar and Abir.

No (or Non). Seacoast division. The word is said to mean ‘‘town beloved.’’ (See
p- 30.)

OcapaTaGaA. Between Henhenguepa and Janar.

QuEYuHIcHA. Between Estantapaca and Juestocobaga.

QuIstYovEe, Seacoast division.

SACASPADA, (ACASPADA. Seacoast division. Between Estame and Satucuava.

Satucuava. Between Sacaspada and Judyi.

SrnaeEsta. Seacoast division.

Srvapa. Seacoast division. Between Juestocobaga and Tonco.

Soco. Seacoast division. Between Judyi and Vuebe.

TAGUAGEMAE (or Taguagemue). Between Chipi and Namuguya.

Tampa, TANPA. Seacoast division. The northernmost town of the Calusa country,
followed on the south by Yagua. Itwas probably on Charlotte Harbor. Accord-
ing to one Spanish writer the Indians at the mouth of the present Tampa Bay
were called by some people Tampas, by others ‘‘ Vantabales.”’

Tatesta, Testa. Seacoast division. It is given as a town between Tekesta and
Cuchiaga, according to one writer, about 80 leagues north of the latter town.
A ‘“‘key of Tachista” is also mentioned in one place, and still another docu-
ment places it on the Florida Keys. It may have been near their inner end.

TavaGuEemue. Interior division. ~

;

TreQuEeMAPO. Seacoast division. Between Coyobia and Jutun. »

Tryo. Between Vuebe and Muspa.

Trquizacua. From the narrative of a Calusa expedition undertaken in 1680. Pop-
ulation of town, 300.

Tomo. Seacoast division.

Tomsose, Tomcose. Interior division. Between Estegue and Chipi. Perbaps
the Sonsobe of Fontaneda, who in one place speaks of it as a province distinct
from Calusa.

Tonco. Between Sinapa and Cayucar.

Tucut. Seacoast division.

5
4
3
3
¥
>
a
:
4

ae AAS PRD RI 8 8 a a Crh heh es

acd

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 333

VANTABALES. See Tampa.
VureBse. Between Soco and Teyo. Possibly the Guevu of Fontaneda.
YaGua. Seacoast division. Between Tampa and Estantapaca.

As stated above, the settlements on tle east coast did not belong
to a single province, although there is reason to consider them
as having constituted one linguistic group with the Calusa.'! The fol-
lowing settlements are mentioned, beginning at the southern end of
this strip of coast:

TekestA, TeGesta, Tequesta. Situated close to the present Miami.

TAVUACIO.

Janar. As the writer who gives this is the same who records a town Janar among
the Calusa we may assume that they are not identical.

CABISTA.

CusTEGIyo.

JeAGA, GEAGA, JeGA, GeGA, GuEGA. This was located in the present Jupiter Inlet.
According to Spanish writers it was 10 leagues north of Tekesta and 18 leagues
south-southeast of Ais.

Guacata, CuacaTa. In one place Fontaneda speaks of this as a town on Lake May-
aimi (Okeechobee) and elsewhere as one of the provinces of the east coast. A
Spanish document in the Lowery collection gives it as a place ‘‘in the land of
Ays.’’ It is possible that these people lived on St. Lucie River and camped
farther inland than most of the coast people. In that case they would probably
be identical with the people of the town afterwards known as Santa Lucia
from a missionary establishment started among them.

Tunsa. Given as a town or province ‘‘in the land of Ays.’
Timucua list.

Ars, Ays, Aiz, Hayz,Jece. The chief of this town or province was the most powerful
on the eastern coast. From Dickenson it appears that he was able to overawe
all of the chiefs to the south of him as far as the Jeaga, and the ‘‘province of
Ais” is made by the Spaniards to extend in the other direction nearly to Cape
Canaveral. The capital town itself was near Indian River Inlet, and Indian
River itself was known as ‘‘the river of Ais.’’ This is sometimes called San
Agustin de Ais from an abortive missionary attempt made there.

Utumay (given in one place as Cotomas). This is spoken of asa ‘‘province” and
at the same time placed in the territory of Ais. It was near Cape Canaveral
and on the borders of the south Florida linguistic area or areas. Fontaneda
makes the language of Ais extend as far as Maiaca and Maiajuaca, but the
first of these was Timucua, and there is reason to think that: the Timucua tribes
extended even farther south. See Surruque in the Timucua list.

Orponoy. A town in the province of Ulumay.

Bovocue. A town in the province of Ulumay.

Rea. A land or town of the province of Ais. (See p. 342.) It is doubtful whether
this word has been correctly copied.

’

But see Tunsa in the

* Harrisse has shown that the peninsula of Florida was almost
certainly discovered and mapped with an approximation to accu-
racy late in the fifteenth or early in the sixteenth century, a
dozen years at least before the supposed discovery by Ponce de Leon
in 1512 or 1513.2 Still, if Florida does not owe her entry into Euro-
pean history to the last-mentioned navigator, she unquestionably

1 See p. 31. 4 Harrisse, Disc. of N. A., pp. 77-109, 142-153.

834 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

does her name, which afterwards displaced all previous appellations.
Ponce de Leon ranged the coasts seemingly for many miles, on both
the eastern and western sides, and then returned to Porto Rico,
where he had outfitted. In 1521 he undertook a second expedition,
coasting the western side of the peninsula and making a landing,
perhaps in Apalachee Bay, as suggested by Harrisse.'. Here, however,
he was defeated by the Indians and badly wounded. He returned
to Cuba to be cured, but soon died. Meantime, in 1519, Francisco
de Garay sent an expedition into the Gulf of Mexico, which traced
the northern coast of the Gulf from Florida to the River Panuco.
In 1524 Verrazano is supposed to have followed the coast of North
America from Florida northward. All of these navigators simply
touched upon the shores of the peninsula. 'We now come to expedi-
tions which penetrated some distance into the interior. The first of
these was led by the unfortunate Narvaez, who landed in Florida
April 11, 1528, probably at or near Tampa Bay. From there the
Spaniards marched inland, meeting very few Indians and apparently
only one or two Indian villages. They crossed two rivers, which we
may surmise to have been the Withlacoochee and Suwanee, and
. finally came to the country of the Apalachee. No tribal names are
mentioned in the territory traversed before reaching these people;
merely the name of a chief, Dulchanchellin, whose village seems to
have been in that province which the De Soto narratives call Ocale. ?
What happened to the Spaniards among the Apalachee has been
related in giving the history of the Apalachee tribe.’

The expedition of De Soto reached Tampa Bay May 25, 1539. On
Tuesday, July 15, it set out from the town of O¢ita, or Ucita, which
was evidently near the head of the bay, passed through the territory
of Mocog¢o, and then through a number of places which seem to have
been under a chief named Urriparacogi. Afterwards the explorers
crossed the Withlacoochee River and came into the province of Ocale,
and from there, leaving the province of Acuera to one side, reached
the important province of Potano on or near the Alachua plains.
Then they passed northward through Potano, crossed another river,
perhaps the Santa Fe, and came into still another important province
known as Aguacalecuen, or Caliquen. It is uncertain whether the places
entered by them, beyond the capital of this province, all belonged
toitornot. At any rate the next great chief mentioned was U¢achile,
Uzachil, or Ossachile, a name which I have sought to identify with the
later Osochi, and from his territory they traveled into the province of
Apalachee northward of Ocilla River.‘ All of the people living in

1 Harrisse, Disc. of N. A., p. 152.
2 Bandelier, Jour. of Cabeza de Vaca, pp. 9-23; Oviedo, Hist. Gen., m, pp. 579-581; Doc. Ined., xIv, pp.
269-271,

8 See pp. 112-115.
¢ Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, pp. 21-46; , pp. 4-6, 51-71

z
+
-
€

a ee as

SY SID Peis A 5

5
:4
x
z
;
¢
7
&
;

te eed Se a al es tee ee ee es oe ee el

Yet oy

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 835

these places probably belonged to the great Timucua group. The
De Soto chroniclers are of particular service in giving us an early
picture of the tribes of this stock toward the western side of the
peninsula, the later settlements all having been made from the east.

The next important chapter in the history of Florida is its settle-
ment by French Huguenots. The first expedition sailed in Feb-
ruary, 1562, under Jean Ribault, and sighted land on the east coast
near where St. Augustine now stands. There Ribault opened com-
munications with the natives, entered the River St. Johns, and after-
wards sailed on up the coasts of Florida and Georgia until he arrived
at what is now Broad River, South Carolina. There he established
a small colony in the neighborhood of the present Beaufort and then
returned to France. The party left by him succeeded very well for
a time, but, becoming impatient at his long absence and despairing
of his return, they finally built a small vessel in which a few of them
at length reached France after incredible hardships. In 1564 three
vessels were sent out from Havre under the command of Réné Gou-
laine de Laudonniére and came in sight of Florida at a point about
30 leagues south of the entrance to the River St. Johns, which had
already been named by Ribault the River May. They opened com-
munications with the Indians almost immediately, and after exploring
the country in search of a suitable site for an establishment, finally
picked out a place on the south bank of the St. Johns River and built
a fort there, which they named Fort Caroline. This fort was occu-
pied by the French from some time in July, 1564, to September 19,
1565, when it was captured by the Spaniards under Pedro Menendez
de Aviles, and the brief French colonial period in Florida and Carolina
was brought to an end.1

During the time of their occupancy the Frenchmen explored the
country in all directions, and the accounts which they have left,
supplemented by the drawings of Le Moyne, a member of the second
expedition, give us more ethnological information regarding the
ancient Floridians—outside the domain of language—than is pre-
served from the entire Spanish period. An expedition to avenge
those Frenchmen who had been put to death by Menendez was
undertaken in the year 1567 by Dominique de Gourgues and was
eminently successful, but the Spaniards remained in possession of the
country and continued to occupy it, with one brief interruption,
until 1821.

The Spanish conquest of Florida—both civil and _ spiritual—
starting from St. Augustine, proceeded slowly in all directions. The
Indians were at first hostile, for no nation secured the attachment
of the natives so quickly as the French; but as the French refugees

1 Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de La Floride; Le Moyne, Narrative.

8386 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

were gradually weeded out from among the Indians and the latter
became used to their new neighbors the opposition died down. A letter
dated 1568 states that there had recently been a massacre of Spaniards
at Tocobaga. In 1576 or 1577 Pedro de Andrada was sent at the
head of 80 soldiers to support Autina (Utina) against Saturiwa,
Nocoroco, Potano, and other chiefs! In 1583 Governor Pedro
Menendez Marques writes that all of the Indians in the interior, as
well as on the coast, had come to see him and yield their obedience.
He declares that the Indians were being converted rapidly.”

In 1584 war broke out again with the Potano and Captain Andrada,
who had been sent against the tribe as before, was killed along with
19 of his men.’ In retaliation a body of troops under Gutierrez de
Miranda, alcaide of Santa Elena, was sent against these people,
many were killed, and they were driven from their town.’ In 1585

there was considerable mortality among the Indians.* These events ©

do not seem to have interfered with the conversion of the natives,
however, which contemporary documents speak of as proceeding
very rapidly. The work was assisted particularly by two native
leaders, Dofia Maria, chieftainess of a town within two gunshots of
St. Augustine, and Don Juan, chief of the island of Tacatacuru or
San Pedro, the present Cumberland Island. The former, whose
husband was a Spaniard, was of material assistance, receiving and
entertaining those Indians who came to St. Augustine from a distance.
A letter written, or rather dictated, to the King of Spain by her, is
preserved in the Spanish archives. Don Juan is the chief who,
although a Timucua, desired to be made mico mayor of the province
of Guale. This chief was of great assistance in driving back
the rebellious inhabitants of Guale in 1597.° In the eastern Timucua
districts alone, including Nombre de Dios, San Pedro, San Antonio,
and the Fresh Water district to the south, there were said to be
more than 1,500 Christian Indians in 1597. They came from all
quarters, however, to be baptized.’

About the time of the Guale outbreak trouble arose with a tribe
in the neighborhood of Cape Canaveral, whose name is spelled
Curruque, Surruque, Zorruque, Horruque, Surreche, and in various
other ways. According to some of the missionaries the governor
made an unprovoked attack upon this tribe, but he himself says
that these people had killed a Spaniard named Juan Ramirez de
Contreras and two Indian interpreters, besides several persons who
had been shipwrecked among them. At any rate he sent a force
which fell suddenly upon a town of this province where he believed
the chief to be living and 60 persons were killed and 54 taken prisoner.

1 Lowery, MSS. 4 Brooks and Lowery, MSS. See p. 84,
2 Brooks and Lowery, MSS. 5 See p. 87.
8 Brooks, MSS,

ee a.

nay ~Cvetity ©

SWANTON } EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 307

It is said in one account that Ais Indians were among those slain,
and this province and Ais are certainly frequently spoken of
together, yet it is probable that they belonged to different linguistic
groups and were associated only geographically as also in their
manner of living.t. Don Juan, the chief of San Pedro and intimate
friend of the Spaniards, died June 16, 1600. He was succeeded by
his niece (his sister’s daughter), in accordance with the custom of
the country.!. During the same year, or shortly before, the Indian
town of San Sebastian, which lay on an arm of the sea back of
St. Augustine, was overwhelmed by an unusual high water and many
of its inhabitants drowned.! In 1601 the Potano Indians asked to
be allowed to return to their town which they had vacated in the
war of 1584.2, In 1602 valuable letters from the missionaries Fray
Baltazar Lopez, who was stationed at San Pedro, and Fray Francisco
de Pareja, at San Juan del Puerto, at the mouth of the St. Johns
River, give us minute information regarding the mission stations
within their districts and the number of Christianized Indians in each.
In the former there were 8 settlements and nearly 800 Christians.
In the latter Pareja mentions 10 settlements and about 500 Chris-
tians, “‘ big and little.”

These friars also speak of several other provinces which they
visited or where there were Christians, including Ybi with 5 towns
and more than 1,000 Indians, Cascangui or Ycafui with 7 or 8 towns
and 700-800 Indians, Timucua with 1,500 Indians, Potano with 5 towns
and where as many as 1,100 Indians were being catechised, and the
Fresh Water province where were said to be six or more towns of
Christian Indians, besides the Mayaca Indians, who had not been
visited by monks.” Pareja is the well-known author of Timucua
catechisms and manuals and a grammar of the language. A letter
from a third friar written the same month states that there were
about 200 Christians in the Fresh Water towns and in Mayaca
perhaps 100 more to be baptized.2, Governor Cango estimates about
1,200 Christians in the four visitas of San Pedro, San Antonio,
San Juan, and Nombre de Dios.?, Pedro Ruiz seems to have been
the missionary at San Pedro in 1604.2 In 1606 these various missions,
along with those in the province of Guale, were visited by the Bishop
of Cuba, who confirmed 2,075 Indians and 370 Spaniards.?_ Letters
of Alonso de Pefiaranda and Francisco Pareja, of November 20, 1607,
complain of attacks made by wild Indians on those who had been
Christianized. They state that between November, 1606, and Octo-
ber, 1607, 1,000 Indians had been Christianized, and that in all
there were over 6,000 Christian Indians.? In 1608 Governor Ibarra

1 Lowery and Brooks, MSS. 2 Lowery, MSS.
148061°—22 22,

3388 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

claims that 4,000 Indians had been converted in a year and a half
and that 1,000 more were under instruction by the missionaries.
He says that the church in San Pedro was as big as that in St. Augus-
tine; that it had cost the Indians more than 300 ducats, and had
they not worked on it themselves it would have cost them more
than 2,000 ducats.!. In 1609 the chief of Timucua (Utina) with his
heir and the leading men of his tribe were baptized in St. Augustine;
and later we are told that 28 Timucua and Apalachee chiefs begged
for baptism.?_ A letter from the missionaries dated January 17, 1617,
informs us, however, that in the preceding four years more than
half of the Indians had died of pestilence. Yet they claim 8,000
Christianized Indians still living.? It is stated that many mission-
aries died of the pest in 1649 and 1650; yet in the latter year there
were 70 in Florida.? It is not said whether this pestilence extended
to the natives. The number and names of the Timucua missions
existing in the years 1655 and 1680 have already been given.?

In the year 1656 a rebellion broke out among the Timucua and
lasted eight months, even spreading to the Apalachee. Governor
Robelledo says that it was directed against the friars, but the letter
of a missionary lays the blame upon the governor himself, because
he had tried to compel the Indians to bring corn on their backs
into St. Augustine. The leader of this revolt is said to have been
the chief of St. Martin, evidently the town known as San Martin de
Ayaocuto, and was participated in by 10 others, including the chiefs
of Santa Fe de Toloco, San Francisco de Potano, San Pedro y San
Pablo de Puturiba, Santa Elena de Machaba, San Francisco de Chua-
quin, Santa Cruz de Tarixica, San Matheo de Tolapatafi, San Juan del
Puerto, and San Juan de Guacara. The Sergeant Major Adrian de
Cafiicares was sent to the disturbed area by Governor Robelledo with
60 infantry, the rebellion was put down, and 11 Indians garroted.?
This appears to have been the only uprising of any consequence in
which the Timucua Indians were involved. A letter from Capt. Juan
Francisco de Florencia to the then governor of Florida, dated 1670,
states that in November, 1659, he had been ordered to go to the prov-
inces of Ustaqua and Timucua to people and rebuild the towns of San
Francisco, Santa Fe, San Martin, and San Juan de Guacara, which had
been depopulated because some natives had died in the pestilences
they had had and others had gone to the forests (montes), ‘‘ because
these places formed the passageway and means of communication to
the said provinces from the presidio of St. Augustine.””! This depopu-
lation was probably due immediately to the great rebellion.

In 1672 there is said to have been another great mortality among
the Indians.1. A memorial by Fray Alonso del Moral, dated September

1 Lowery, MSS. 2 Lowery.and Brooks, MSS. 3 See p. 322.

= Wala aa aa hi te Gere TS ee Pe eee oe a eRe ee ee Pte ee

i ei gt ime ok

DEN ett ok yer BSS.

PUSSY SC Mabie tA data tp sie ne fa

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 339

24, 1676, states that there were then 70 places for missionaries but
usually only about 40 to fill them; in 1681 the number of missionaries
is given as 34.!. The list of missions drawn up in 1680, while showing
more in the Apalachee province and practically the same number in
Guale, exhibits a distinct decrease among the Timucua missions and
it is evident that some former Timucua missions are largely con-
cerned with different peoples. In 1688 a letter was written to the
then King of Spain, Charles II, by several Timucua chiefs, with the
assistance, of course, of the missionaries. It was a companion letter
to that sent by the Apalachee already mentioned.? It was signed
by Don Francisco, chief of San Matheo; Don Pedro, chief of San
Pedro; Don Ventura, chief of Asile; Don Diego, chief of Machaua;
Gregorio, chief of San Juan de Guacara; and,Francisco Martinez,
residente in San Matheo.* These are given in the Spanish version, In
the Timucua some of these and some parts of the letter do not appear.
We may assume that the towns mentioned were the chief remaining
towns of the Timucua. Utina, Potano, Acuera, and the Fresh Water
district are not represented. In 1697 it is said that the missionary,
Fray Luis Sanchez, was murdered in Maiaca, which is spoken of as a
new conversion; and, although this mission bears a Timucua name,
it is evident that it was then settled largely by Yamasee.!

The destruction of the Timucua missions by the Creeks and Eng-
lish, along with those of the Apalachee and other Florida Indians,
now followed rapidly, so rapidly that one writer declares the destruc-
tion of the provinces of Timucua, Apalachee, and Guale took place
within four or five months. He places the event in the year 1704,
which is only approximately correct. A royal officer, Juan de Pueyo,
writing November 10, 1707, says that the province of Florida was
then being rapidly depopulated by the English and infidel Indians,
who were extending their depredations southward of St. Augustine.
He states that 32 settlements of Indians had been destroyed, a num-
ber almost as great as that of the missions.* It is possible that some
Timucua had revolted along with the Guale Indians and the Yamasee,
but probably not many did so. The following general account of the
destruction of the missions, along with some information regarding
the last Indian villages in Florida before the arrival of the Seminole,
is contained in a letter by Governor Dionisio de la Vega, written
August 27, 1728:

Up to the year 1703, when the English made their first invasion from Carolina
assisted by the Indians in their interest into the provinces of Apalache and Guale,
the Indians thereof lived in perfect peace and tranquility; and from time to time some

infidel Indians would come and join them, desirous of pledging their obedience. But
the said provinces having been destroyed by virtue of said invasions, and all the

1 Lowery, MSS. 8 Gatschet in Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., Xv, pp. 495-497.
2 See. pp. 12, 120. 4 Brooks, MSS.

340 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

towns deserted and many of the Indians, converted as well as infidels, killed or made
prisoners, while the majority of them revolted and joined the English, enjoying the
freedom under which they were allowed to live. The few who then preferred to
remain under the protection of the arms of Y. M., settled down upon other lands
where they could consider themselves free and secured from the attacks of the revolted
Indians and formed their huts and settlements under the name of towns, where they
were assisted by the missionary fathers with that love and zeal which was required
of them.

After the destruction of these provinces and their towns, war continued torage between ~
the converted and infidel Indians, the latter assisted and fomented by the English. All
around their [i. e., the English] towns are settlements, where they have congregated a
large number of Caribe Indians, allowing them those liberties to which they are accus-
tomed, and in this manner they have succeeded in annihilating over four-fifths of the
number of Indians who had sought refuge. The rest of them remaining in their settle-
ments, the largest of which hardly had a population of sixty souls, males, females,
children, and Indians all told. In each of those settlements resided a clergyman, this
being indispensable owing to the diversity of languages, which requires their separate
instruction in the doctrine, and in some of those settlements it was necessary to have
two clergymen because of the population being composed of Indians of distinct
nationalities.

In none of these settlements was it ever possible to have a church where the holy
sacrament of the Eucharist could be offered, notwithstanding they were distant only
seven, five, and three leagues from this city (St. Augustine) ; so great was the fear they
had of the infidels, that for the slightest cause they would move from one place to
another without ever having a permanent residence.

For this reason, and because the churches dedicated for mass to be said in them, were
not decent, it was decided to administer the Viaticum to the sick Indians during the
hour of its celebration only.

But seeing themselves every day more and more harrassed by the infidel Indians,
they sought refuge under the guns of the fort of this city, where they have formed their
settlements, the farthest being within gunshot distance, the names of the said settle-
ments or towns being Mores, Nombre de Dios, El] Nuevo, Tolemato, La Costa, Palica,
and Casapuyas. The first one was composed of twenty men, eighteen women, and ten
children, and among them there were only one man and one woman infidels. The
second was composed of eighteen men, fourteen women, and eight children, all Chris-
tians. The third one was composed of twenty-three men, twenty-two women, and
twenty children, all Christians, except one of the men who was an infidel. The
fourth one has no fixed number; sometimes it has thirty or forty, and at other times
only four or six, owing to its inhabitants being fond of moving about, similar to those
from the keys. The women who generally reside there are seven, and about twelve
children, all [the latter] Christians. The men [of the last town] are mostly infidels,
and of the women three. The fifth had fourteen men, ten women, of whom some are
infidels, and possibly had about four or five children. Chiqueto, which is also called
Nombre de Dios, had about fifteen men, and twenty women, all Christians, and
finally Casapuyas had fourteen men, and as many women, of whom the majority
were infidels, and was composed of two different nations.!

There is an evident mistake in the last paragraph quoted, but as
it has occurred in the Spanish transcription and possibly was made

by the author himself, it can not be entirely rectified here. The
principal trouble is that, while the writer professes to give the popu-

1 Brooks, MSS,

att

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 341

lation of the several towns in the order in which their names appear,
one of them, Nombre de Dios, is second in the list of names and
sixth in the statistical list. This leaves it uncertain whether the
other names and figures correspond, especially since the word “fifth”
in the translation has been substituted for ‘‘sixth”’ in the original on
the probable, but not necessarily correct, supposition that the writer
had made a mistake. It is also possible that the Spanish text names
six towns instead of seven. It runs as follows: ‘‘meres nombre de
Dios Tolemato el nuevo la costa Palica y Casapuyas,”’ and it is impos-
sible to say whether the name of the third is Tolemato or Tolemato el
nuevo. I have assumed the former provisionally in order to make
the seven towns which the statistics call for. In the English trans-
lation accompanying this text matters have been made worse by
the entire omission of Mores, El Nuevo, and La Costa. Neverthe-
less, with the exception just noted, we have no reason to doubt the
correctness of the town names given and the statistical information
is borne out by a comparison with that on pages 105-106, although
the number of the towns themselves does not precisely correspond.

Following the above, De la Vega adds the information regarding
the Apalachee towns which I have quoted elsewhere. Then he
continues:

The aforesaid was the condition of the religious settlements in the provinces subject
to the jurisdiction of San Agustin de la Florida, whose churches were built of palmetto,
both the walls and roof, except the one at Holomacos[Tolomato], which was built of
lumber board, and the one at Nombre de Dios, which was the best and contained the
image of Our Lady of the Milk, the walls of which, through private donations of the
faithful, had been built of stone and mortar, although the roof was of palmetto like
the others. Buta body of two hundred English having penetrated into that town on
the aforesaid day, the twentieth of March [1728], together with as many Indians, they
plundered and pillaged it and set the whole town on fire. They robbed the church
and the convent and profaned the images, killing six and wounding eight Indians, a
lieutenant and a soldier of infantry. They also took several prisoners with them and
withdrew without further action. In view of this the governor had the church blown
up by means of powder, withdrawing the Indians who had remained there to the
shelter of this city, leaving only the town of Pocotabaco [ Pocotalaco] under the pro-
tection of the guns of this fort."

As I have pointed out elsewhere, the Yamasee or Guale element
was evidently predominant in these villages, and how many of them
were occupied by Timucua we do not know, although that called
“Pueblo de Timucua”? probably contained most of them. A few
may have emigrated to southern Florida and joined the Indians
there, and a few were probably absorbed into the Yamasee. Those
who retained their tribal identity withdrew to the Mosquito Lagoon
and Halifax River, Volusia County, where Tomoka River keeps

1 Brooks, MSS. 4 See p. 105.

849 _" BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

their name alive. Ultimately, even these must have been absorbed
by the invading Seminole.

It is somewhat singular that during this period of intense missionary
activity in northern Florida the Indians in the southern part of the
peninsula had been left for the most part to their own devices. They
would perhaps have been left entirely alone had it not been for the
numerous shipwrecks on their coast and the necessity of protecting
the lives and property of those cast away among them. Shortly
after founding St. Augustine, Menendez visited the head chiefs of
Calos and Tocobaga, the latter probably Timucua, however.
In 1566 we learn that the Takesta protected some Spaniards from ~
the chief of Calos,? and in the legend on an early Spanish map it is
stated that the Indians in that neighborhood had been converted by
Pedro Menendez Marques. They afterwards abandoned their spiritual
but retained their political allegiance.* During or just before 1570
there was war between the Spaniards and the people of Ais, for we
read in an early manuscript that, in accordance with the terms of a
treaty of peace made with Ais in 1570, 40 reales were given to the
chief of Colomas [Ulumay], ‘‘a land of the Cacique of Ays,” and 80 to
the chief of Rea in the same province. It is probable that the last
name has been miscopied.t| In 1597 Governor Mendez de Can¢o
traveled from the head of the Florida Keys to St. Augustine. The
chief of Ais met him with 15 canoes and more than 80 Indians.* In
a letter written the year following Can¢o says that this chief had
more Indians than any other between those two points.? The Ais
are mentioned in connection with the Curruque expedition about the
same time but they were only incidentally concerned in it.°

Tn 1605 an Ais Indian called Chico, or the Little Captain, evidently
a subordinate chief, came to St. Augustine with 24 warriors to offer
his services to Governor Ibarra, who, he had heard, was at war with
the French and English. Complaint was made that the Indians of
Nocoroco had bewitched the cousin of the grand chief of Ais. A
messenger was sent to confer with the grand chief and promise was
made that some young Spaniards would be sent to learn the Ais lan-
guage.» In 1607 Governor Ibarra states that during Holy Week he
had received visits from the chief of Santa Lucia, Don Luis, the Little
Captain of Ais, Don Juan Gega, and others, “who are the principal
lords of the mouth of the Miguel Mora.” * This name was given to
the opening between the Florida mainland and the keys on the
eastern side. From a letter written the following year it appears

1 Lowery, Span. Sett]., u, pp. 228-243, 277-280; Barcia, Florida, pp. 94-98, 125-129.
2 Barcia, Florida, p. 124.

8 Brooks, MSS.

4 Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Library.

5 Lowery, MSS.

6 See pp. 336-337.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 3438

that Don Luis, chief of the mouths of Miguel Mora, and the chief of
Guega[Jeaga] had been at war, and that the governor had made peace
between them.' In 1609 the chief of Ais visited St. Augustine and
several chiefs living on the southeast coast were baptized in that
city.!

In 1612 an expedition was sent to the southwest coast of Florida
to punish the chiefs of Pooy and Tocopaca (Tocobaga) because they
had attacked Christian Indians. This expedition also pushed on
farther south until it came to the town of Calos, from which more
than 60 canoes came out to meet it. The chief of Calos is said to
have had more than 70 towns under him, not counting the very great
number which paid him tribute because they feared him.t The
same year Indians came from beyond Calos asking for missionaries."
A missionary letter of 1618 states, however, that the Indians of
Jeaga and Santa Lucia were ‘‘rebellious,’”’ and Christianity seems
not to have affected them permanently. A decade later we hear
that hostile English and Dutch vessels were using this territory,
particularly that between the bar of Ais and Jeaga, as an anchorage
ground.! In 1680 the clergy of Florida desired to enter upon the
conversion of the natives of the southern part of the peninsula, and
in consequence the governor of Florida, Don Pablo de Hita Salazar,
sent an interpreter to reconnoiter that region. The latter entered
several Calos towns, but was finally turned back by the natives,
who feared that they should be held responsible by the chief of Calos
if they allowed him to proceed to that place. He reported that the
Calusa Indians dominated all others in that part of the peninsula and
forced them to pay tribute to their chief, who was known as ‘‘No
he querido”’ (‘‘Not loved’’).!. A letter written in 1681 states that
many Indians fleeing from Guale had settled in the towns of Calos.*
Another effort to missionize the Calusa in 1697 also failed, but it
is said that the Indians then livmg on Matacumbe Island were
‘““Catholies.’’?

An intimate picture of the Indians of the southeastern coast is
given by the Quaker Dickenson, who was cast away there with a
party from Pennsylvania in 1699.3 An attempt was made to ‘‘reduce”’
the Ais Indians to the Catholic faith in 1703,‘ but there is no evidence
that any success was attained, and both they and the Calusa appar-
ently remained unconverted to the very end of Spanish rule. Romans
states that in 1763, the year when Florida passed from Spanish to
British control, the last of the Calusa people, consisting of 80 fami-
lies, crossed to Havana.’ Not all of the Calusa left the country,
however, and indeed the emigrants may have been Tekesta and

1 Lowery, MSS. 4 Barcia, Florida, p. 322.

2 Barcia, Florida, p. 316. 5 Romans, Concise Nat. Hist. Fla., p. 29.
3 See pages 92-93, 389 et seq.

344 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY _ [BULL 73

other occupants of the eastern shore, who were always rather better
inclined toward the Spanish ovcrmen than were the Calusa.
Until recently this fate of the old Florida tribes was remembered by
some of the oldest Creek Indians.t_ Possibly the Calusa may have
emigrated in the year mentioned and returned with the return of the
Spaniards 20 years later, but it is improbable that southern Florida
was ever entirely abandoned. At any rate some of these people were
in occupancy of the territory about Charlotte Harbor and the Caloosa-
hatchie River in the period of the Seminole war. They took no part
in this contest during its earlier stages. They made no treaties
with the Americans and at no time agreed to remove to the west.
Comparatively unnoticed, they remained in their old haunts, car-
rying on a considerable commerce with Havana, and looking to that
city as their trading point. Williams describes their condition in
the first half of the nineteenth century as follows:

The inhabitants of several large settlements around the Caximba Inlet, the heads
of the Hujelos, St. Mary’s, and other southern streams, never appeared at,the agency
to draw annuities, but lived by cultivating their fields, hunting, trading at the Spanish
ranchos, bartering skins, mocking birds, and pet squirrels, for guns, ammunition and
clothing, and sometimes assisting in the fisheries. This race of Indians would have
remained peaceable to this day had not an order been issued from the agency requiring
them all to remove. They never agreed to remove, either personally or by their
representatives; and they were easily excited to fight rather than leave the homes of
their ancestors. “Their knowledge of the country and their long connection with the
Spanish traders and fishermen afforded perfect facilities for supplying the Seminoles
with arms and munitions of war, and those facilities are at this time improved to our
great injury.”

They were first seriously disturbed when the Seminole, hard pressed
in their seats near the center of the State, moved southward into
the Everglades. There they intrenched themselves and induced
the Calusa, or ‘‘Spanish Indians,’’ as they are called in the docu-
ments of the time, to take up arms in their interest. In 1839 Colonel
Harney had gone to Charlotte Harbor to establish a trading post
for the Indians, when his camp, consisting of 30 men, was attacked
by 250 Indians and 18 were killed.? In retaliation for this injury
Colonel Harney fell upon the Spanish Indians, under their chief
Chekika, July 23, 1839, killed Chekika and hung six of his followers.*
The next year Doctor Perrine, a botanist living on Indian Key,
who was devoting himself to the culture of tropical plants, was
killed by Chekika’s band. This happened on the 7th of May, 1840.5
Other depredations were also committed by them. If they are the

1 See p. 188.

2 John Lee Williams, The Territory of Florida, 1837, p. 242.
3 Fairbanks, Hist. of Florida, p. 191.

4Ibid., p. 194. But Fairbanks dates the event too late.

5 [bid., p. 191

——eEE— ll

ty y4"s at. ca i i a lin ak a i le alle eS eee ee ee eeeeeererrererlrereeerereerrrereeee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 345

Florida ‘‘Choctaw,”’ as I have supposed, we can trace them down to
1847 when ‘‘four Choctaw warriors’’ are enumerated in the penin-
sula.! In 1850 seventy-six more Seminole were sent west,’ but
we do not know whether the remnant in question was among them
or remained in its ancient home. The latter would be the more
likely supposition, but the reverse is indicated by an old Seminole
Indian in Oklahoma, who declared that he knew of these Florida
Choctaw, asserting that one youth descended from them is still living
among the Seminole of Oklahoma. He added that when the Seminole
reached Fort Smith during their removal west the Choctaw who were
with them wanted to remain with the Choctaw who had emigrated
from Mississippi, but the Indian agent would not allow it. He
knew nothing regarding the origin of this band of Choctaw, but
thought they had emigrated to Florida from Mississippi about the
time when the other Seminole settled there.

ETHNOLOGY

From what has been said regarding the history of the Florida
Indians it is evident that it is no longer possible to add to their
ethnology, except as new manuscripts come to light from time to
time, particularly in the Spanish archives. It is probable, however,
that such supplementary information will be comparatively small.
We must rely principally on the narratives of Laudonniére and his
companions, assisted by the illustrations of Le Moyne, on such infor-
mation as may be extracted from the writings of the Franciscan
fathers, Pareja and Mouilla, and on a few notes in the works of
other Spaniards. It has not been thought best to reproduce Le
Moyne’s drawings in the present volume, although his text has been
freely drawn upon, because the former contain so many errors that
Le Moyne must have intrusted the execution to some one entirely
unfamiliar with his subject, or else extreme liberties must have been
taken with the originals.

Ribault describes the Timucua as ‘‘of good stature, well shaped of
body as any people in the world; very gentle, courteous, and good-
natured, of tawny color, hawked nose, and of pleasant countenance.’’?
They were good swimmers and could climb trees with agility.

The only invariable article of apparel worn by males was the
breechclout, which we are informed consisted of a painted deerskin.
Le Moyne represents this as if it were in one piece, passed about the
privates, and carried round and tied at the back. If his representa-

~ tion might be relied upon the Florida Indians would be set off in this

1 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, 1, p 522. 2 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, pp. 171, 172.

846 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuL. 73

particular from all Indian tribes known to us, but there is every
reason to believe he is wrong. As worn elsewhere, the breechclout
consisted of a belt about the waist and a skin or piece of cloth passed
between the legs and between the belt and the body, the ends being
allowed to fall down in front and behind. That the natives did have
belts is proved by Ribault’s narrative, for he says that when he was
at the mouth of the St. Johns River a chief sent him a girdle of red
leather in token of friendship.!. The warm climate of Florida rendered
additional garments less necessary than with other southern tribes,
but it is quite certain that they were worn. So far as men are
concerned, the only direct evidence of this which we have, how-
ever, is contained in one of Le Moyne’s drawings in which the chief
Saturiwa is represented wearing a long garment,” and in a statement
by Spark, who says: :

In their apparell the men only vse deer skinnes, wherewith some onely couer their
priuy members, other some vse the same as garments to couer them before and behind;
which skins are painted, some yellow and red, some blacke and russet, and euery
man according to his owne fancy.*

He adds that the color with which these skins were adorned “neither
fadeth away nor altereth color” when washed.t The one figured by
Le Moyne is apparently a painted deerskin, but it appears to be
intended rather to add to the gorgeous appearance of the chief who
wears it than to protect him from the cold. Women wore a kind of
short skirt made of Spanish moss.* If Le Moyne may be trusted,
instead of being fastened around the waist, this was sometimes
, carried up over one shoulder.6 An anonymous writer who accom-
panied Laudonniére says:

The women have around them a certain very long white moss, covering their breasts
and their private parts.’

Sometimes this was of skin, for Le Challeux remarks:

The woman girds herself with a little covering of the skin of a deer or other animal,
the knot saddling the left side above the thigh, in order to cover the most private
parts.®

And Hawkins’s chronicler confirms this:

The women also for their apparell vse painted skinnes, but most of them gownes of
mosse, somewhat longer than our mosse, which they sowe together artificially, and make
the same surplesse wise.*

1 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 170.

2 Le Moyne, Narrative, pl. 39.

3 Hakluyt, Voyages, I, p. 613.

4Tbid., p. 615.

6 Le Moyne, Narrative, plates and p. 14; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 172.
6 Le Moyne, Tbid.

7 Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 405.

8 Thid., p. 461.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 347

Dickenson testifies to the same effect:

The women natives of these towns clothe themselves with the moss of trees, making
gowns and petticoats thereof, which at a distance, or in the night, looks very neat.!

Most of the people of whom he speaks were, however, refugees from
Guale. In his narrative Le Moyne also mentions “‘many pieces of a
stuff made of feathers, and most skilfully ornamented with rushes of
different colors,’”’ sent in from the western Timucua by a French
officer. They may have been those feather cloaks so common
throughout the south. The women wore their hair long, but cer-
tainly not in the disheveled fashion represented by Le Moyne.2 From
a remark of Ribault it is evident that the men were in the habit of
pulling out the hair on all parts of their bodies except the head.*
They do not seem to have roached their heads like the Creeks. Ri-
bault says, in describing those Indians whom he saw, “Their hair was
long and trussed up, with a lace made of herbs, to the top of their
heads,’’ and this remark is confirmed by Laudonniére and in the
pictures of Le Moyne.t| In another place, where he describes the
leading men who accompanied Saturiwa, Ribault states that their
hair was “trussed up, gathered and worked together with great
cunning, and fastened after the form of a diadem.”* Le Challeux
says:

They keep their hair long, and they truss it up neatly all around their heads, and
this truss of hair serves them as a quiver in which to carry their arrows when they are
at war.®

He also says, regarding feathers:
They esteem nothing richer or more beautiful than bird feathers of different colors.”

These are represented by Le Moyne on several of his subjects, used
in a great variety of ways. One has a single sheaf of feathers coming
straight out from the knot of hair at the back of his head. Another
has a number of long, curving feathers in the same place, suggesting
a fountain. Another has a kind of feather tassel tied to the top-
knot by a cord or small withe. Many have feathers around the
edges of the hair lower down, either alone or in addition to some
of the central clumps of feathers just mentioned. Saturiwa and
some of his leading men are represented on various occasions with
small tufts of feathers of exceptional height over the middle of the
forehead in front, with the tail of an animal hanging from the top-
knot, or again with what appears to be a metallic diadem encircling

! Dickenson, Narrative, p. 93.-

2Cf. Hakluyt, Voyages, ml, p. 613. ‘‘Wearing theire haire downe to their shoulders, like the [Eas-]}
Indians.”

3 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 172.

4 Le Moyne, Narrative, plates and p. 14; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 173.

6 Tbid., p. 178.

6 Gaffarel, op. cit., p. 461.
7Ibid., p. 462.

848 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

the forehead. Asis well known, circlets of this last kind made of silver
were in common use among our southern Indians. There must also be
mentioned skins of animals with the head on, one of which appears
with a kind of tassel hanging out of the mouth. The persons who
wear these are evidently doctors or other principal functionaries.
Laudonniére says that feathers were worn particularly when they
went to war.? Perhaps the most interesting headdress is what ap-
pears to be a basket hat.* We should have to go as far as the great
plateaus to find anything comparable. Pareja, however, speaks of
a palm-leaf hat worn by the women,‘and this is what Le Moyne
may have intended.

Turning to ornaments, we find it worthy of note that there is no
evidence that these peoplepierced the nose or the ears except in one
place, the soft lobe, where nearly all of Le Moyne’s figures, both
male and female, are represented with a kind of dumb-bell shaped
ornament.°? Le Moyne says of this:

-All the men and women have the ends of their ears pierced, and pass through them
small oblong fish-bladders, which when inflated shine like pearls, and which, being
dyed red, look like a light-colored carbuncle.®

In two cases men are represented with staple-shaped earrings, in
one with a ring, and in another with the claws of some bird thrust
through this member. The person wearing these last was probably
a doctor. Says Le Challeux:

They prize highly little beads, which they make of the bones of fishes and other
animals and of green and red stones.’

Ornaments were also worn about the neck, wrists, and ankles,
just above the elbows and biceps, just below the knees, and hanging
from the breechclout. One woman is represented with a double row
of pearls or beads about her waist. Ribault says that the French
obtained from the Indians ‘of Florida, gold, silver, copper, lead, tur-
quoises, ‘‘and a great abundance of pearls, which they told us they
took out of oysters along the riverside; and as fair pearls as are
found in any country of the world.’’® By oysters I suppose we are
to understand fresh-water mussels. At least the greater part of the
pearls among the southern Indians were extracted from these. Says
Spark:

The Frenchmen obteined pearles of them of great bignesse, but they were blacke,
be meanes of rosting of them, for they do not fish for them as the Spanyards doe, but
for their meat.!°

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, plates.

2 Laudonniére, Hist. Not.de la Floride, p. 9; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 172.
3 Le Moyne, Narrative, pl. 11.

4 See p. 387.

5 Le Moyne, Narrative, ills.

6 Tbid. p. 14.

7 Gafferel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 462.

8 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 37.

9 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 177.

10 Hakluyt, Voyages, ml, p. 616.

a a eT ee

Need. 2s:

ra EFS

i
;
3
+

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 349

Shells, and beads worked out of shells, were also employed, and
Le Moyne mentions ‘“‘bracelets of fishes’ teeth.” ' The gold and sil-
ver, as Laudonniére expressly states—and in this he is confirmed by
Fontaneda—were obtained from wrecked Spanish vessels bound from
Mexico and other parts of the “Indies” to Spain; ? and the quantity
among them speaks volumes for the number of disasters of this kind
which must have taken place.

Hawkins’s chronicler describes the gold and silver found in Florida
at considerable length, but to much the same purport:

Golde and siluer they want, not: for at the Frenchmens first comming thither they
had the same offered them for little or nothing, for they receiued for a hatchet two
pound weight of golde, because they knew not the estimation thereof: but the souldiers
being greedy of the same, did take it from them, giuing them nothing for it: the
which they perceiuing, that both the Frenchmen did greatly esteeme it, and also did
rigorously deale with them, by taking the same away from them, at last would not be
knowen they had any more, neither durst they weare the same for feare of being
taken away: so that sauing at their first comming, they could get none of them: and
how they came of this gold and siluer the Frenchmen know not as yet, but by gesse,
who hauing trauelled to the Southwest of the cape, hauing found the same dangerous,
by means of sundry banks, as we also haue found the same: and there finding masts
which were wracks of Spanyards comming from Mexico, iudged that they had gotten
treasure by them. For it is most true that diuers wracks haue beene made of Span-
yards, hauing much treasure: for the Frenchmen hauing trauelled to the capeward
an hundred and fiftie miles, did finde two Spanyards with the Floridians, which they
brought afterward to their fort, whereof one was in a carauel comming from the Indies,
which was cast away fourteene yeeres ago, the other twelue yeeres; of whose fellowes
some escaped, othersome were slain by the inhabitants. It seemeth thay had esti-
mation of their golde & siluer, for it is wrought flat and grauen, which they weare
about their neckes; othersome made round like a pancake, with a hole inthe midst,
to boulster vp their breasts withall, because they thinke it a deformity to haue great
breasts. As for mines either of gold or siluer, the Frenchmen can heare of none they
haue vpon the Island, but of copper, whereof as yet also they haue not made the
proofe, because they were but few men: but it is not unlike, but that in the maine
where are high hilles, may be golde and siluer as well as in Mexico, because it is all
one maine.*

To the same origin must be attributed the ‘‘gold alloyed with
brass, and silver not thoroughly smelted”? which one of Laudon-
niére’s lieutenants sent him from the western Timucua districts.4
The articles made of these, however, were without doubt worked over
into objects such as had been manufactured out of copper already
in pre-Columbian times.. I have made mention of the metal diadems.
Le Moyne figures round and oval metal plates strung together
into bands below the knee and above the biceps. Numbers of them

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 2.

2 Laudonnieére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, p. 6; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 170; Mem. Fontaneda,
ed. Smith, pp. 21-24.

3 Hakluyt, Voyages, m, pp. 615-616.

4 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 8.

350 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

also appear fastened to the breechclouts by separate cords in the
manner of a fringe, and larger circular pieces are hung about the
necks of several of the principal men. We are told that the plates
fastened to the breechclouts were placed there so as to produce a
tinkling sound when the wearer moved, and they were particularly
used in dances.2 How they were made fast to the strings is not
evident, but the large neck pieces were secured to a cord about the
neck of the wearer by means of a hole in the center of the plate,
through which the cord was passed and knotted on the outside so
that the knot would not pull through.* The later southern Indian
method of fastening silver ornaments to clothing was similar. Al
of the gorgets which Le Moyne depicts are circular, while the other
plates are oval.* In his text he enumerates among the things sent
by La Roche Ferriere from the western Timucua country “circular
plates of gold and silver as large as a moderate-sized platter, such as
they are accustomed to wear to protect the back and breast in war.’ *
This passage suggests another use for these plates, and no doubt they
actually did furnish a certain amount of protection to the wearer;
but if they were consciously worn with this object in view the idea
must have been secondary, for most of the warriors are represented
without them, and the largest that Le Moyne figures furnish but very
partial protection. Ribault mentions one Indian who had hanging
about his neck ‘fa round plate of red copper, well polished, with a
small one of silver hung in the middle of it; and on his ears a small
plate of copper, with which they wipe the sweat from their bodies.’’®
This last was rather utilitarian than ornamental, but seems to have
served both purposes. It is the only mention of a sweat scraper in
America that has come to my attention. Another man had ‘‘a pearl
hanging to a collar of gold about his neck, as great as an acorn.” ®
If we could trust the expression used here we would have to sup-
pose another kind of neck ornament which fitted closer than the
ornaments already described, but this is the only Florida reference
upon which such a conclusion can be based, and nothing of the kind
is figured by Le Moyne. Nevertheless Le Moyne speaks of “girdles
of silver-colored balls, some round and some oblong.” ’ If the trans-
lation is correct we seem to have an ornament somewhat more diffi-
cult to manufacture than the plates elsewhere described, but here
again there is no certain evidence with which to back up the infer-
ence. Silver chains mentioned as worn by the chiefs* were probably
of Spanish origin. The beads and pearls were arranged in separate

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, plates. 6French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 178.

2 [bid., p. 14. eIbid., p. 177.
8 Ibid., plates. 7Le Moyne, Narrative, pp. 2, 14 (ill.).

4Ibid., p. 8. &French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 350.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 351

strings or mixed together in all the places in which metal plates could
be worn, except as tinklers on the breechclout. Spark says:

The Floridians haue pieces of vnicornes hornes which they weare about their necks,
whereof the Frenchmen obteined many pieces.!

The absolute silence of French writers on this subject is ground for
suspicion that Spark misunderstood the origin of the shell gorgets,
though it is quite possible that bison horns or portions of them were
worn in this manner.

Tn one picture Le Moyne represents feather fans on the ends of poles
borne by two companions of the chief and again by companions of
a woman being brought to the chief as his wife.2. A Florida chief
presented Ribault with a “plume, a fan of harnshau (heron) feathers,
dyed red.” *

Like their neighbors to the north, the Timucua resorted to
tattooing very extensively. Ribault says:

The forepart of their bodies and arms they also paint with pretty devices in azure,
red, and black, so well and properly, that the best painters of Europe could not
improve upon it.*

This is not given as tattooing, but Laudonniére is evidently speak-
ing of the same designs when he remarks:

The most part of them have their bodies, arms, and thighs painted with very fair

devices, the painting whereof can never be taken away, because the same is pricked
into their flesh.®

Says Le Moyne:

The reader should be informed that all these chiefs and their wives ornament their
skin with punctures arranged so as to make certain designs, as the following pictures
show. Doing this sometimes makes them sick for seven or eight days. They rub the
punctured places with a certain herb, which leaves an indelible color.®

Le Challeux also says that “for ornament they have their skin
checkered (marqueté) in a strange fashion,’ and John Spark,
chronicler of Hawkins’s second voyage, adds the following testimony:

They do not omit to paint their bodies also with curious knots, or antike worke, as
every man in his own fancy deuiseth, which painting, to make it continue the better,
they vse with a thorne to pricke their flesh, and dent in the same, whereby the paint-
ing may have better hold.®

They supplemented this with temporary face paintings, particularly
upon state occasions or when they went to war.

In their warres [says the writer last quoted] they vse a sleighter colour of painting

their faces, thereby to make themselves shew the more fierce; which after their warres
ended, they wash away againe.®

1 Hakluyt, Voyages, m, p. 616. 5 Laudonniére, Hist. Not. de la Floride, p. 6.
2 Le Moyne, Narrative, pls. 37, 39. 6 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 15 (ill.).
3 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 180. 7 Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 461.

4Tbid., 1875, p. 171. 8 Hakluyt, Voyages, II, p. 613.

352 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Farther on he states that the colors employed were ‘‘red, blacke,
yellow, and russet, very perfect.” ' When Ribault and his com-
panions crossed the St. Johns after having met the Indians on one
side, he says that he found them ‘waiting for us quietly, and in
good order, with new paintings upon their faces, and feathers upon
their heads.” ? And Laudonniére states that when they went to
war they painted their faces much, “and stick their hair full of
feathers, or down, that they may seem more terrible.” * Le Moyne
notes that they were “in the habit of painting the skin around their
mouths of a blue color.” 4 Like the Creeks, their neighbors, they
kept their bodies covered with bear grease, for some ceremonial
reason, Laudonniére declares, and also to protect them from the
sun’s heat. °

The chiefs Onatheaqua and Houstaqua living near the Apalachee
painted their faces black, while the other Timucua chiefs painted
theirs red.6 The Indians first seen by De Soto and his men at Tampa
Bay were painted red.’

Another peculiar custom is thus described by Le Moyne:

They let their nails grow long both on fingers and toes, cutting (or scraping) the
former away, however, at the sides (with a certain shell), so as to leave them very sharp,

the men especially; and when they take one of the enemy they sink their nails deep
in his forehead, and tear down the skin, so as to wound and blind him.4

There are not many special descriptions of Timucua houses.
Ribault says, in speaking of the dwellings of those Indians whom he
met at the mouth of the river which he called the Seine and which
was probably what is now known as the St. Marys:

Their houses are made of wood, fitly and closely set up, and covered with reeds, the
most part after the fashion of a pavilion. But there was one house among the rest
very long and wide, with seats around about made of reeds nicely put together,
which serve both for beds and seats, two feet high from the ground, set upon round
pillars painted red, yellow, and blue, and neatly polished.®

Le Challeux describes them thus:

Their dwellings are of a round shape and in style almost like the pigeon houses of
this country, the foundation and main structure being of great trees, covered over
with palmetto leaves, and not fearing either wind or tempest.®

Says Le Moyne:

The chief’s dwelling stands in the middle of the town, and is partly underground
in consequence of the sun’s heat. Around this are the houses of the principal men,
all lightly roofed with palm branches, as they are occupied only nine months in the
year; the other three, as has been related, being spent in the woods. When they

1 Hakluyt, Voyages, mI, p. 615. 6 Tbid., p. 91.

2 French, op. cit., p. 178. 7 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, U, p. 56.

3 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 9. 8French, op. cit., p. 180.

4 Le Moyne, Narrative, pp. 8, 15. *Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 461.

6 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 12.

av a

FERS Bee OSS

ven

IIE | tals.

_—

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 353

come back they occupy their houses again; and if they find that the enemy has
burnt them down, they build others of similar materials. Thus magnificent are
the palaces of the Indians.'

The description of Timucua houses given by Spark contains
details not noted by the others:

Their houses are not many together, for in one house an hundred of them do lodge;
they being made much like a great barne, and in strength not inferiour to ours, for
they haue stanchions and rafters of whole trees, and are covered with palmito-leaues,
hauing no place diuided, but one small roome for their king and queene.?

‘It is to be noticed that the houses at the mouth of the St. Marys
were covered with reeds, while on those which were farther south
palmetto was employed. It is probable that the frames and the rest
of the construction were practically identical. The greater part of the
common houses figured by Le Moyne are circular, but there is another
type square or squarish in ground plan and with a pronounced gable,
although the gable ends are sloping, not perpendicular. Besides
these, two houses are figured square or oblong in outline, with a dome-
shaped roof, and the door in one end very similar to some of the
houses on the North Carolina coast. The town house, the one
described at most length by Ribault, is also figured by Le Moyne in
one place.* It is represented as a long, quadrilateral building with a
regular gable and perpendicular ends. This specimen appears to be
thatched with palmetto like the rest. In 1699 Dickenson described
the town houses in three mission stations in this region, but these
were mainly occupied by Indians from the former province of Guale,
and the architecture can not be set down as certainly Timucua.
What he has to say regarding them will be found on pages 92-93.
Cabeza de Vaca must mean one of the town houses when he speaks
of a house ‘‘so large that it could hold more than 300 people.” ®

The following description of the village of Ucita on Tampa Bay
may be given by way of contrast, showing as it does either a some-
what different method of arrangement on the west coast of Florida
or greater variety in method than the French narratives indicate:

The town [of Ucita] was of seven or eight houses, built of timber, and covered with
palm leaves. The chief’s house stood near the beach, upon a very high mount, made
by hand for defense; at the other end of the town was a temple, on the roof of which
perched a wooden fowl with gilded eyes.®

In the center of the town of Uriutina was ‘‘a very large open court,’”
and in Napetaca a ‘‘town yard”’ is mentioned.’ It appears that the
beds of these Indians were made on a raised platform about the sides

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, p-.12 (ill.). 5 Bandelier, Jour. Cabeza de Vaca, p. 10.
2 Hakluyt, Voyages, m1, p. 613. 6 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 23.
*Le Moyne, Narrative, pls. 30-33. TIbid., 0, p. 72.
4Ibid., pl. 30. 8 Ibid., p. 44.
148061 °—22 285 6

854 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

of the houses precisely like those of the other southern tribes.
The seats illustrated by Le Moyne were probably made in an identical
manner and were in fact the same thing.!. Their openwork construc-
tion offered certain advantages, thus explained by a writer quoted
by Gaffarel:

They are often bothered by little flies, which they call in their language maringous
and it is usually necessary for them to make fires in their houses, absolutely under
their beds, in order to be freed from these vermin; and they say that they bite severely,
and the part of the skin affected by their bite becomes like that of a leper.?

Spark seems to have seen a more solidly constructed bed, pro-
vided with a wooden pillow:

In the middest of this house is a hearth, where they make great fires all night, and
they sleepe vpon certeine pieces of wood hewin in for the bowing of their backs, and
another place made high for their heads, which they put one by another all along the
walles on both sides.*

The narrative of De Gourgues records that Saturiwa seated him
upon ‘‘a seat of wood of lentisque, covered with moss, made of pur-
pose like unto his own,’’! the rest sitting upon the ground. Perhaps
these seats were of the three-legged variety used in the West Indies
and throughout the Southern States generally.

They made their fires in the usual Indian fashion, by means of
two sticks.

Le Moyne figures several different kinds of pots and baskets.
Some of the former are of a size and shape suggestive of Creek sofki
pots. In one picture alarge pot with a round bottom is seen placed
over afire. There are also two or three earthen pots, some with short
handles, a few flat dishes or pans, and in one place are two large gourds
or earthen jugs which seem to be provided with strap handles and to be
closed by means of small earthen jars placed over them, mouth down.°*
Laudonniére saw in the house of one of the chiefs ‘‘a great vessel of
earth made after a strange fashion, full of fountain water, clear, and
very excellent.’’® ‘‘A little vessel of wood,” used as a cup, is spoken
of in the same connection,® and Le Moyne mentions round bottles or
wooden vessels in which they carried cassine.’

Among baskets we find the common southern carrying basket
with a strap passing over the forehead of the bearer. Le Moyne
figures sieves and fanners. In addition, however, there is a basket
with two handles very much like our bushel basket, and several

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, pls. 29, 38.

2 Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, pp. 461-462.
3 Hakluyt, Voyages, Il, p. 613.

4 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 209.

5 Le Moyne, Narrative, pl. 20.

6 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 74; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, pp. 228-229.
7 Le Moyne, op. cit., p. 12 (ill.).

PR ray

$
3
%
4

A So TR FTAs OEE ONES Cet > |

= lt EE ety

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 355

baskets with one handle like European baskets.' These last I
believe to have been based on the imagination of the illustrator. In
1562 one of the Florida chiefs presented Ribault with ‘‘a basket
made of palm boughs, after the Indian fashion, and wrought very
artificially.”? Three years later one of his lieutenants received
‘‘Jittle panniers skillfully made of palm leaves, full of gourds, red and
blue.”* Woven mats are also spoken of. It appears from Pareja
that shells were ordinarily used as drinking cups.°

Regarding skin dressing Le Moyne says:

They know how to prepare deerskin, not with iron instruments, but with shells,
in a surprisingly excellent manner; indeed I do not believe that any European could
do it as well.®

Skins, painted and unpainted, were presented to the French; and
one of those given to Ribault was ‘‘painted and drawn throughout
with pictures of divers wild beasts; so lively drawn and portrayed
that nothing lacked but life.’

Le Moyne mentions ‘‘green and blue stones, which some thought
to be emeralds and sapphires, in the form of wedges, which they used,
instead of axes, for cutting wood.’’® From this it appears that they
probably felled trees, cleared their land, and manufactured canoes
in the same manner as the other southern Indians, using stone axes
and fire. At any rate they made their canoes out of single trunks
of trees. Ribault says that these would hold 15 or 20 men, and he
adds that they rowed, or rather paddled, standing up.’ The canoes
illustrated by Le Moyne all have blunt bows, but those at present
employed by the Florida Seminole are pointed, and the canoes

‘recovered from time to time from the marshes also have pointed

bows. The use of additional pieces for the bow and stern does not
seem to have been known. Le Moyne represents their paddles
with rather short, wide blades. That they had means of cutting
very hard substances is shown by the statement in Elvas that the
Indians captured by De Soto’s army would file through the irons at
night with a splinter of stone.° As elsewhere in the Southeast, cane
knives were extensively employed.

The dog was the only domestic animal, and there is no evidence
that it was used to assist in transportation; therefore land transporta-
tion was all on foot, berdaches being employed to carry very heavy

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, plates.

2 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 17; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 180.
3 Laudonniere, ibid., p. 75; French, ibid., p. 230.

4 Laudonniére, ibid., p. 168; French, ibid., p. 315.

5 See p. 384.

6 Le Moyne, op. cit., p. 8.

7 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 17; French, op. cit., p. 280

8 French, op. cit., 1875, p. 178.

® Le Moyne, op. cit., plates.

16 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 46.

356 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73.

burdens.t| The chiefs, chiefs’ wives, and other principal persons
were, on occasions of state, carried in litters, borne on the shoulders
of several men. All early Spanish travelers among the southern
Indians speak of these, and Le Moyne illustrates one in which a
woman is being borne on the shoulders of four men.’ She is
placed on a raised seat covered with a decorated skin, and protected
from the sun by a structure of green boughs. Each of the bearers
carries a crotched stick in one hand. The opposite end of each of

these was stuck into the ground when they made a halt and~

the handles of the litter were allowed to rest in the crotches.
Before march two men blowing on flutes, and at the sides are two
others with large feather fans on the ends of long poles. Some of
these features, especially the last, seem suspiciously European, but
the use of flutes before such personages is well attested. Feather
fans were also employed throughout the southern area; it is rather the
type of fan shown here that is doubtful.

Other animals besides the dog were perhaps reared from time to
time, as one of Laudonniére’s lieutenants was presented with two
young eagles by a chief who had bred them in his house.? The
statement in De Soto’s letter regarding domestication of turkeys and
deer is evidently a mistake. Ribault says that the tools with which
they made their ‘‘spades and mattocks,” their bows and arrows, and
short lances, and with which they ‘‘cut and polished all sorts of
wood that they employed about their buildings,’ were ‘certain
stones, oyster shells, and mussels.’’®

They lived partly upon the natural products of the earth, but
depended principally upon the chase, fishing, and agriculture.
Laudonniére says:

They make the string of their bow of the gut of the stag, or of a stag’s skin, which
they know how to dress as well as any man in France, and with as different sorts of
colors. They head their arrows with the teeth of fishes, which they work very finely
and handsomely.®

Ribault states that the shafts of their arrows were of reed.’ Spark
is considerably more detailed:

In their warres they vse bowes and arrowes, whereof their bowes are made of a
kind of Yew, but blacker than ours, and for the most part passing the strength of the
Negros or Indians, for it isnot greatly inferior to ours: their arrowes are also of a great

length, but yet of reeds like other Indians, but varying in two points, both in length
and also for nocks and feathers, which the other lacke, whereby they shoot very

1 See p. 373.

2 Le Moyne, Narrative, pl. 37.

8 Laudonnitre, La Floride, p. 75; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 230.
4 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 0, p. 162.

§ French, op. cit., p. 174.

6 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 7; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, pp. 170-171.
‘ French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 174.

piety 2

mye

% 7. 4 e

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 357

stedy: the heads of the same are vipers teeth, bones of fishes, flint stones, piked points
of knives, which they hauing gotten of the French men, broke the same, & put the
points of them in their arrowes heads: some of them haue their heads of siluer, other-
some that haue want of these, put in a kind of hard wood, notched, which pierceth
as farre as any of the rest. In their fight, being in the woods, they vse a maruellous
pollicie for their owne safegard, which is by clasping a tree in their armes, and yet
shooting notwithstanding: this policy they vsed with the French men in their fight,
whereby it appeareth that they are people of some policy.'

Commenting on the weapons of the Timucua farther west, Elvas
says:

Their bows are very perfect; the arrows are made of certain canes, like reeds, very
heavy, and so stiff that one of them, when sharpened, will pass through a target.
Some are pointed with the bone of a fish, sharp, and like a chisel; others with some
stone like a point of diamond; of such the greater number, when they strike upon
armor, break at the place the parts are put together; those of cane split, and will enter
a shirt of mail, doing more injury than when armed.”

Le Moyne speaks of arrows with gold heads sent in by one of the
Frenchmen from the western Timucua, but these were probably
copper.’ Their arrows were not poisoned.‘ Quivers were made of
skins, but from Le Challeux it appears that their hair was impressed
into service as a natural receptacle for arrows (see p. 347). He adds:

It is wonderful how suddenly they take them in their hands in order to shoot to a
distance and as straight as possible.®

A wrist guard made from bark is described and figured by
Le Moyne.°

Deer were stalked, as we know from a picture of Le Moyne’s and
the following description accompanying it:

The Indians have a way of hunting deer which we never saw before. They manage
to put on the skins of the largest which have been taken, in such a manner, with the
heads on their own heads, so that they can see out through the eyes as through a
mask. Thus accoutered they can approach close to the deer without frightening them.
They take advantage of the time when the animals come to drink at the river, ard,
having their bow and arrows all ready, easily shoot them, as they are very plentiful in
those regions.’

The only difference to be noticed between the method illustrated
here and that known to have been used north and west is the use of
the entire deerskin instead of the head only.

The spears spoken of and illustrated by Le Moyne were probably
used in killing fish; probably fishhooks were also in use. The only
method of fishing about which we have direct information, however,
was by means of fish traps or weirs. Some are figured by Le
Moyne,® and Ribault says that they were “built in the water with

1 Hakluyt, Voyages, m1, p. 613. 6 Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 461.
3 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 26. 6 Le Moyne, op. cit., p. 10 (ill.), pl. 14.

3 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 8. 7 Ibid., p. 10 (ill.).

« Bourne, op. cit. U1, p. 69. 8 Tbid., pl. 3.

3858 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

great reeds, so well and cunningly set together after the fashion of a

labyrinth, with many turns and crooks, which it was impossible to
construct without much skill andindustry.” 1 Among the fish given
to the French were ‘‘trout, great mullets, plaice, turbots, and mar-
velous store of other sorts of fishes, altogether different from ours.” ”
Ribault mentions crabs, lobsters [?], and crawfish among the articles
of diet. Laudonniére received presents of ‘‘fish, deer, turkey cocks,
leopards [panthers], and little brown bears.” * An early Spanish
writer says that the natives of San Pedro (Cumberland Island) ‘‘sus-
tained themselves the greater part of the year on shellfish (marisco),
acorns, and roots.’ >

Alligators formed quite an item in the Floridian bill of fare, and
Le Moyne thus describes how they were hunted:

They put up, near a river, a little hut full of cracks and holes, and in this they
station a watchman, so that they can see the crocodiles [or alligators] and hear them
a good way off; for, when driven by hunger, they come out of the rivers and crawl
about on the islands after prey, and, if they find none, they make such a frightful
noise that it can be heard for half a mile. Then the watchman calls the rest of the
watch, who are in readiness; and taking a portion, ten or twelve feet long, of the
stem of a tree, they go out to find the monster, who is crawling along with his mouth
wide open, all ready to catch one of them if he can; and with the greatest quickness
they push the pole, small end first, as deep as possible down his throat, so that the
roughness and irregularity of the bark may hold it from being got out again. Then
they turn the crocodile over on his back, and with clubs and arrows pound and pierce
his belly, which is softer; for his back, especially if he is an old one, is impenetrable,
being protected by hard scales.®

We must, of course, discount the man-eating proclivities attributed
to this animal, but the description of the hunt may nevertheless be
perfectly correct. We are also indebted to this author for the only
extant account of the methods pursued in preserving game and fish:

In order to keep these animals longer they are in the habit of preparing them as
follows: They set up in the earth four stout forked stakes; and on these they lay
others, so as to form a sort of grating. On this they lay their game, and then build a
fire underneath, so as to harden them in the smoke. In this process they use a great
deal of care to have the drying perfectly performed, to prevent the meat from spoil-
ing, as the picture shows. I suppose this stock to be laid in for their winter’s supply
in the woods, as at that time we could never obtain the least, provision from them.’

The picture to which reference is made shows such a frame sur-
mounted by several fish, a deer, an alligator, a snake, and some quad-
ruped about the size of afox. This, and astatement by Le Challeux,
are the only references to snake eating which the various narratives

1 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 172.

2 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 18; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 180.

3 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 178. Perhaps the “‘lobster’’ was the ‘“‘langosta’’ mentioned by
Fontaneda, p. 387.

4 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 130; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 279.

5 Lowery, MSS.

6 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 10 (ill.) and pl. 26.

7Tbid., pp. 9-10 (ill.).

tr eee

Pr eh Torr etic? eed roar)»

ee EE EEE eee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 859

contain, although the last author speaks of the eating of lizards.!
It may be suspected that this picture is drawn from the imagination
of the illustrator rather than from direct observation, for it is
improbable that such animals were dried without being dressed.
The description of the general drying process agrees very well, how-
ever, with what we know of this process elsewhere in the South.
Le Challeux says that they used fish grease in place of butter ‘‘or any
other sauce.’’? The same observer thus speaks of corn: ‘‘They do
not have wheat, but they have corn in abundance, and it grows to
the height of 7 feet; its stem is as big as that of a cane and its grain
is as large as a pea, the ear a foot in length; its color is like that of
fresh wax.”’? The following statement by Laudonniére gives the
best account of the method of cultivation and along with it an
insight into the native economic life:

They sow their maize twice a year—to wit in March and in June—and all in one and
the same soil. The said maize, from the time that it is sowed until the time that it be
ready to be gathered, is but three months on the ground; the other six months, they
let the earth rest. They have also fine pumpkins, and very good beans. They never
dung their land, only when they would sow they set weeds on fire, which grow up the
six months, and burn them all. They dig their ground with an instrument of wood,
whichis fashioned like a broad mattock, wherewith they dig their vinesin France; they
put two grains of maize together.. When the land is to be sowed, the king commandeth
one of his men to assemble his subjects every day to labor, during which labor the king
causeth store of that drink [cassine] to be made for them whereof we have spoken.
At the time when the maize is gathered, it is all carried into a common house, where
it is distributed to every man, according to his quality. They sow no more but that
which they think will serve their turn for six months, and that very scarcely. For,
during the winter, they retire themselves for three or four months in the year, into the
woods, where they make little cottages of palm boughs for their retreat, and live there
of maste, of fish which they take, of disters [oysters], of stags, of turkey cocks, and
other beasts which they take.*

Le Moyne, however, asserts that they planted toward the end of
the year, allowing their seed to lie in the ground nearly all winter.

The Indians cultivate the earth diligently; and the men know how to make a kind
of hoe from fish bones, which they fit to wooden handles, and with these they pre-
pare the land well enough, as the soilis light. When the ground is sufficiently broken
up and levelled, the women come with beans and millet, or maize. Some go first with
astick, and make holes, in which the others place the beans, or grains ot maize. After
planting they leave the fields alone, as the winter in that country, situated between
the west and the north, is pretty cold for about three months, being from the 24th of
December to the 15th of March; and during that time, as they go naked, they shelter
themselves in the woods. When the winter is over, they return to their homes to
wait for their crops to ripen. After gathering in their harvest, they store the whole
of it for the year’s use, not employing any part of it in trade, unless, perhaps some
barter is made for some little household article.> \

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 2.

2 Gaffarel, Hist. Floride francaise, p. 462.

3 Laudonniére, La Floride, pp. 11-12; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 174.
4In small huts; Laudonniére, op. cit., pp. 12, 144; French, op. cit., pp. 174, 294.
5 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 9 (ill.).

860 . BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

As with the more northern tribes, small outhouses were built near
the fields and watchers posted in each to drive away crows.?

Ribault mentions among the things planted by the Floridians
‘‘beans, gourds, citrons, cucumbers, peas, and many other fruits and
roots unknown to us.’”” For ‘‘citrons’”’ and ‘‘cucumbers”’ we should
probably understand pumpkins and squashes. Later Spanish writers
tell us, however, that the Indians of the Fresh Water district lived
only on fish and roots.* The same was true of all the Indians on the

coast to the southward.* In later times a change may have taken |

place for Dickenson encountered cultivated fields north of Cape
Canaveral in which pumpkins were growing.®

Their food was broiled on the coals, roasted, or boiled. There is
every reason to believe that corn was cooked in all the numerous ways
known to other southern Indians. Le Moyne enumerates ‘‘grains of
maize roasted, or ground into flour, or whole ears of it’? among the
things which the natives brought to Laudonniére’s people,® and at one
time they were presented with ‘‘little cakes.’’’ Laudonniére men-
tions among the articles of food carried along by the Indians when
they were away from home “‘victuals . . . of bread, of honey, and of
meal, made of maize, parched in the fire, which they keep without
being marred a long while. They carry also sometimes fish, which
they cause to be dressed in the smoke.’”’* Le Challeux says:

The method of using it [corn] is first to rub it and resolve it into flour; afterward they
dissolve it [in water] and make of it their porridge [migan], which resembles the rice
used in this country; it must be eaten as soon as it is made, because it spoils quickly
and can not be kept at all.®

Spark gives the following naive account of the use of tobacco:

The Floridians when they trauell, haue a kinde of herbe dried, who with a cane and
an earthen cup in the end, with fire, and the dried herbs put together doe sucke thorow
the cane the smoke thereof, which smoke satisfieth their hunger, and therewith they
liue foure or fiue dayes without meat or drinke, and this all the Frenchmen vsed for
this purpose; yet do they hold opinion withall, that it causeth water & fleame to void
from their stomacks.!°

While we do not find it stated specifically that the Timucua culti-
vated tobacco, the fact may probably be assumed.

The granary or storehouse has been mentioned, but the various
accounts leave us in the dark as to whether all of these granaries were
public or whether there were private granaries also. The reference

1 Laudonniére, in French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 227.

2 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 174.

3 Lowery, MSS.

4 Brooks, MSS.

5 Dickenson, Narrative, p. 66.

6 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 2.

7 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 177.

8 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 9; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 172. The mention of honey is curious
and seems to be unique so far as Florida is concerned. But see p. 202.

9 Gaffarel, Hist. Floride francaise, p. 462.

10 Hakluyt, Voyages, Il, p. 615; see also p. 386.

<2) eee ge eee

, ae

hse entails oe hae?

age SAE Nee phy yivint.

earch on

RI eA IPRI: 0% IEEE RN pd Rage SN ra 8, PyRDA y AN GBS a

ies
vV

gt.

ey >

AES en OLD “Br Earn > Pe a ee ee eee ee ee eee

SWANTON J EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 361

in Le Moyne’s account of the disposition of the corn crop would lead
one to suppose that he is speaking of family granaries,! and the same
seems to be in some measure implied in the section in which he tells
of the way in which native wild fruits were stored. He says:

There are in that region a great many islands, producing abundance of various kinds
of fruits, which they gather twice a year, and carry home in candes, and store up in
roomy low granaries built of stones and earth, and roofed thickly with palm-branches
and a kind of soft earth fit for the purpose. These granaries are usually erected near
some mountain, or on the bank of some river, so as to be out of the sun’s rays, in order
that the contents may keep better. Here they also store up any other provisions
which they may wish to preserve, and the remainder of their stores; and they go and
get them as need may require, without any apprehensions of being defrauded. Indeed
it is to be wished that, among the Christians, avarice prevailed no more than among
them, and tormented no more the minds of men.?

This use of ‘‘stones and earth” for granaries is confined, so far as
we now know, to Florida; elsewhere they were of poles. The mutual
regard which they observed with reference to their stores did not pre-
vent them from pilfermg small articles from the French colonists.
An anonymous writer says:

They are, however, the greatest thieves in the world, for they take as well with the
foot as with the hand.*

But he exonerates the women from this charge. Le Challeux, how-

ever, confirms the main accusation:

They steal without conscience and claim all that they can carry away secretly.4

In the following section, where Le Moyne speaks of the storage of
animal food, he is certainly referring to a public storehouse:

At a set time every year they gather in all sorts of wild animals, fish, and even
crocodiles; these are then put in baskets, and loaded upon a suflicient number of
the curly-haired hermaphrodites above mentioned, who carry them on their shoul-
ders to the storehouse. This supply, however, they do not resort to unless in case
of the last necessity. In such event, in order to preclude any dissension, full notice
is given to all interested; for they live in the utmost harmony among themselves.
The chief, however, is at liberty to take whatever of this supply he may choose.®

It does not seem very likely that all of the animal food was put
into public storehouses and all of the corn and wild fruits into pri-
vate ones. Evidently both kinds of granary were in existence, but our
authorities are not clear regarding the relative functions of the two.

The number of natural products drawn upon in addition to the
cultivated plants and animal foods must have been very large, but
we have only the reference just given, and one or two others.
Ribault makes a statement to the effect that the natives gave them
‘‘mulberries, raspberries, and other fruits they found in their way,” ®

1See p. 360. 4 Tbid., p. 461.
2 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 9 (ill.). 5 Le Moyne, Narative, p. 9 (ill.).
3 Gaffarel, op. cit., p. 405. 6 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 173.

362 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

and there is a reference to the use of chinquapins in one of the De
Soto narratives.! Laudonniére speaks of ‘‘mulberries, both red and
white,”’ also of grapes.? The last are also mentioned by Le Challeux *
and Spark.t| From Utina the French received upon one occasion
two baskets of ‘‘pinocks, which are a kind of little green fruit, which
grow among the weeds, in the river, and are as big as cherries.” ®
It is evident from the context that the berries to which Ribault
refers were plucked and eaten fresh. Among the roots mentioned
the kunti of the Florida Seminole is perhaps to be included, though
the latitude is rather high for it, or they might have had the original
kunti of the Creeks, the China brier. Acorns are referred to by one
writer,° and Spark states that the French resorted to them in their
extremity, washing themrseveral times in order to remove the bitter
taste,”? from which it may be assumed that they prepared them in
the same manner as the Indians to the north. A marginal extension
of the native dietary is indicated by Laudonniére and Pareja. The
former says:

In necessity they eat a thousand rifraffs, even to the swallowing down of coal,
and putting sand into the pottage that they make with the meal.’

And from Pareja’s catechism it appears that on occasion they ate
coal, dirt, broken pottery, fleas, and lice, though some of these may
have been taken rather as remedies than as food.®

Not much can be gathered from our French informants regarding
the social organization of these people, but there is enough to show
that they had a class of chiefs to whom great respect was paid,
indicating resemblances to the oligarchic system of the Creeks.
Ribault says:

It is their manner to talk and bargain sitting; and the chief or king to be separated
from the common people; with a show of great obedience to their kings, elders, and
superiors.!°

This impression is confirmed by Pareja, the Franciscan missionary,
and in addition he gives us some information regarding both the
caste and the clan systems, the only information of this nature acces-
sible to us. Naturally this account leaves much to be desired, but
we should rather rejoice at its completeness under the circum-
stances than complain on account of its omissions. This part of
Pareja’s catechism has been published and most of it translated

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 0, pp. 70-71.

2 French, op. cit., 1869, pp. 181, 182, 257.

3 Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 462.

4 Hakluyt, Voyages, I, p. 613.

5 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 149; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 298.
6 See p. 358; also cf. pp. 359 and 383.

7 Hakluyt, Voyages, Il, p. 614.

8 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 9; French, op. cit., p. 172.

® Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., XVI, p. 683.
10 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, pe171.

rciacd ap

1p ape ape PA eA EMRIs

CEL AID, A ge

eanicot an

<diricdisiinne aia

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 863

by Gatschet,! but there are some unfortunate errors and omissions
which have made it necessary to go back to the original work.
A careful study of this has made the general outlines of the
Timucua organization sufficiently plain.

Pareja gives the following terms of relationship and their signifi-
cance along with certain grammatical forms based on them. I have
arranged them for convenience under the appropriate stem words.

chirico: chirico viro, chirico nia, used by father and mother in speaking to their
son and daughter, respectively.

ahono: ahono viro, ahono nia, used precisely like the above. Among terms used
by males we find this given farther on again as a mode of expression ‘‘more used in
the interior.’’ The following additional examples occur: Ahono viro misoma, my
elder son; ahono nia misoma, my elder daughter; ahono viro pacanoqua, my inter-
mediate son; ahono nia pacanoqua, my intermediate daughter; ahono viro quianima,
my younger son; ahono viro iubuacoli, ahono viro quianicocoma, my youngest or last
son; ahono nia iubuacoli, ahono nia quianicocoma, my youngest or last daughter;
ahono viro ysicora, ahono chirico, ahono ysinahoma, my very last son.

iti: itina, my father; itaye, thy father; oqe itimima, the father of that one; itinica,
itinicale, itinicano, ytimile, our father; itayaque, your father; oqecare itimitilama,
ytimilemala, their father; ytele, paternal uncle; yteleye, thy paternal uncle; itilemima,
his uncle; itelemile, ytelenica, ytelenicano, our paternal uncle; yteleyaqe, your
paternal uncle; ytilemitilama, their paternal uncle; ytemiso, name given to an uncle
older than the father; ytequiany, name given to an uncle younger than the father;
ytimale, father and son; ytelemele, uncle and nephew; ytemisomale, elder uncle and
nephew; ytequianimale, younger uncle and nephew.

itora (probably from the preceding stem), grandfather, father-in-law, or godfather;
ytorina, ytorana, my grandfather, etc.; ytoraye, thy grandfather; ytorimima, his grand-
father; ytorimile, ytorinica, ytorinicale, ytorinicano, our grandfather; ytorayaqe, your
grandfather; ytori mitilama, their grandfather; ytora naribua, coesa ytora, great-
grandfather; ytora naribuana, my great-grandfather; ytora naribuaye, thy great-
grandfather; ytora naribuamima, his grandfather; ytora naribuamile, our great-grand-
father; ytora naribuaiage, your great-grandfather; ytora naribuamitilama, their great-
grandfather; ytora mulu, great-great-grandfather; ytora muluna, my great-great-
grandfather; ytora muleye, thy great-great-grandfather; ytora mulumima, his great-
great-grandfather; ytora mulumile, ytora mulunica, ytora mulunicano, our great-
great-grandfather; ytora muluyage, ytora muluyaqeno, your great-great-grandfather;
ytora mulumitilama, ytora mulumitilale, their great-great-grandfather; ytora is the
name given by children to their father, his brothers, and their mother’s brothers after
the death of their mother; ytorapatami, ytorapatamima, paternal uncle’s wife; ytora,
term given by a woman to the husband of her aunt; ytora naribua mulumale, the
great-great-grandfather and great-great-grandson; ytorimale, grandfather and grandson;
ytorimalema, uncle and nephew or godfather and godchild.

siqinona, nisiqisama, the one who begot me (name given to the father after his
death) ; siqinomale, son and father.

naribuana, ‘‘my old man,” name given to father’s brother after his death; naribua-
pacano, name given to a man deprived of his children by death.

hue sipire, hue asire, the second stepfather.

isa, mother: ysona, my mother; ysaya, ysayente, isit thy mother? ysayesa, did thy
mother do that or this? ysayeste, did thy mother say this or that? _ ysaye, iste, thy

1 Proc, Amer. Philos. Soc., XV, pp. 491-497.

864 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

mother does not wish; ysomima, his mother; heca ysomile, heca ysonica, our mother;
ysayage, your mother; ysomitilama, their mother; ysale, maternal aunt; ysalena, my
maternal aunt; ysaleye, thy maternal aunt; ysalemima, his maternal aunt; isalenica,
Isalemile, ysalenicano, our maternal aunt; ysaleyaqe, your maternal aunt; ysalemiti-
iama, their maternal aunt; ysamiso, maternal aunt older than mother; ysa quianima,
maternal aunt younger than mother; ysomale, ysomalema, mother and daughter;
ysalemale, nephew and uncle or niece and aunt.

ule, child (name given by woman): ulena, my child; ulaya,isit thy child? ulemile,
it is her child; ulemima, is it the child of that woman? Maria ulemima (or ulemila),
the child of this Maria, or the child of Maria; ulenica, ulemile, itis our child; uleyaqe,
your child; ulemitilama, the child of that one; Ana ulemicare, the children of Ana;
ulena miso, my elder child; ulena pacanoquana, my second child; ulena quianima,
the younger child; ulena quianicocoma, the fourth child; ulena yubacoli, ulena
usicora, my very last child; ano-ulemama, the mother of living children; ulena, my
sister’s child; ulena, my child (name given by stepmother to stepchild).

yacha: yache pacano, name given to a mother without children or kindred; yacha
quianima, name by which the elder brother calls his younger brother and younger
sister; yacha miso, name by which the elder brother calls his elder sister, applying
also to the children of the father’s brother and the mother’s sister; yachimale, male
and female children of brothers when spoken of collectively; yachemulecoco, great-
grandmother on father’s side and on mother’s; yachimalema, sister and brother;
yachema, mother of a girl just having reached maturity (?).

yquine: yquinena, she who gave me milk (name given to mother after her death);
yquyneye, the mother who gave thee milk; yquinemima, the mother who gave him
milk; yquinemile, the mother who gave us milk; yquineyaqe, the mother who gave
you milk; yquinemitilama, the mother who gave them milk.

nibira, grandmother, stepmother, godmother, aunt on father’s and mother’s side
after father’s death; mother after father’s death; nibirina, honihe nibira, my grand-
mother, etc.; nibiraye, thy grandmother; nibirimima, his grandmother; nibirimile,
nibirinica, our grandmother; nibirayage, your grandmother; nibirimitilama, their
grandmother; nibirayache, ysa yache, great-grandmother; nibirayachena, ysayachena,
my great-grandmother; nibira yacheye, isaiache, thy great-grandmother; nibira
yachemima, ysayachemima, his great-grandmother; nibira yachemile, nibira
yachenica, ysayachemile, ysayachenica, yachenicano; nibira yacheyaqe, ysaya-
cheyaqe, your great-grandmother; nibira yachemitilama, isayachemitilama, their
great-grandmother; nibirayachemulu, great-great-grandmother; nibira yachemuluna,
my great-great-grandmother; nibira yachemuluye, thy great-great-grandmother;
nibira yachemulumima, his great-great-grandmother; nibira yachemulunica, nibira
yachemulunicano, our great-great-grandmother; nibira yachemuluyagqe, your great-
great-grandmother; nibira yachemulumitilama, their great-great-grandmother; nybira
yachemulumale, nibira yachemale, great-grandmother and _ great-grandchild;
nibirimalema, godmother and godchild. :

neba, uncle on mother’s side; nebena, my uncle; nebaye, thy uncle; nebemima,
his uncle; nebemile, nebenica, nebenicano, our uncle; nebayaqe, your uncle; nebe-
mitilama, their uncle; nebua naribama, nebua nebemima, uncle of my uncle;
nebapatani, uncle’s wife; nebemale, uncle and nephew.

nibe, paternal aunt; nibina, my paternal aunt; nibaye, thy aunt; nibimima, his

aunt; nibinica, nibinile, nibinicano, our aunt; nibeyaqe, your aunt; nibimitilama,

their aunt; nibirimalema, aunt and nephew or niece.

nasi, son-in-law, also name given to husband of niece, probably the husband of a
man’s brother’s daughter and the husband of a woman’s sister’s daughter; ano nasi-
mitama, father-in-law, mother-in-law; ano nasimitachiqe, those with fathers- or
mothers-in-law; nasimitana, my father-in-law, or mother-in-law; nasimitaye, thy

—

Le eee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee

pest fe

flee?

PERE ECT NERS Hee tek FSNRE AON, IRIMD S BS MOR HEE arm, dngpeedoctnecse a

- |e ey OE Se ee err Ee a

LIST EPES TaG ae ee As

ty 5 eed

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 865

father- or mother-in-law; nasimitamima, his father- or mother-in-law; nasimitanica;
nasimitamile, nasimitamileno, our father- or mother-in-law; nasimitayaqe, your
father- or mother-in-law; nasimita mitilama, their father- or mother-in-law; nasi,
nasimileno, son-in-law; nasina, My son-in-law; nasiye, thy son-in-law; nasimima,
his son-in-law; nasinica, nasimile, our son-in-law; nasimile carema, our sons-in-law;
nasaye, your son-in-law; nasiyaqe, your sons-in-law; nasimitilama, their son-in-law;
nasimitamale, father-in-law, and son-in-law and daughter-in-law.

nubo, nubuo, daughter-in-law, also wife of nephew, probably the wife of a man’s
brother’s son, and a woman’s sister’s son: nubona, nubuona, my daughter-in-law;
nuboye, thy daughter-in-law; nubomima, his daughter-in-law; nubonica, nubuomile,
our daughter-in-law; nuboyaqe, your daughter-in-law; nubuomitilama, their daugh-
ter-in-law; nubuomitana, nynubemitama, ninubuomitama, my father-in-law or my
mother-in-law; nubuomitamalema, daughter-in-law and father- or mother-in-law.

piliqua, name given by one parent to his or her children after the death of the other;
also given by the children to each other under those circumstances; it is also given
by the mother’s sister and father’s brother to the children when a parent has died;
also used in general for a child without father or mother, or without a relative.

hiosa, elder brother of man, elder boy of father’s brother and mother’s sister, name
which children give each other after death of one parent: name given to two chiefs of
equal rank; women of the Timuqua tribe use this for the elder brother.

qui: quiena, qiena, my child (used by men only); qiena miso, my older child;
quyanima, my younger child; quiani cocoma, yubuacoli, my last or latest child;
quiena, name a man gives his mother’s brother’s child.

quisotimi, name given to third cousins, also to father’s sister’s child, also to a step-
son or stepdaughter; quisotina (another form); niquisa, my (w. sp.) brother’s wife;
niquisimitana, my (w. sp.) husband’s sister; qisitomale, the grandson and the grand-
father, the great-grandson and great-grandiather.

ama, children of father’s sister; amamale, male cousins of brother and sister.

eqeta, equeta, children of father’s sister; eqetamale, male cousins of brother and
sister.

aruqui, children of father’s sister.

pacanoqua, the intermediate child, child born between others.

yubuacoli, last child (of man or woman); yubuaribana, name by which a man
calls his younger brother after the latter’s death.

isicora, isinahoma, the very last child (of man or woman).

anta, antina, name used by a man to his brother and a woman to her sister in the
Timuqua dialect.

yame, a man’s, and probably also a woman’s, sister’s husband; yamancha, yamenchu,
the same in the Timuqua dialect; yamemitana, the name a man calls his wife’s sister.

tafiseems to be the name applied to a man’s brother’s wife; tafimitana was the
name given by a woman to her husband’s brother.

niha, elder brother of man, in Timuqua dialect elder brother of woman also, also
son of father’s brother and mother’s sister older than self; nihona, elder sister of
woman; ano nihanibama, my sister’s son (said by a woman after his death); ano
nihanema, child of sister’s son (said by a woman aiter its death).

amita, amitina, younger brother and sister of man, also the father’s brother’s son
and daughter and mother’s sisters younger than self; amitina, amita oroco, younger
sister of woman; in Potano and Icafi dialects amita chirima, amita chirico.

ano ecoyana, name a man gives to his elder brother after his death.

coni, name which a man gives to his sister’s childern: conina, my nephew or niece;
conaye, thy nephew; conimima, his nephew; coninica, conimile, our nephew;
conayaqe, your nephew; conimitilama, their nephew.

ebo, evo, a woman’s brothers’ and sisters’ children, also her mother’s brothers’
children; ebona, ebuona, evona, my nephew or niece; eboya, ebuoia, thy nephew;
ebuomina, her nephew. —-

366 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 73

iquilnona, name by which a man calls his wife’s sister.

poy, woman’s elder brother; poyna misoma, my elder brother; poyna quianima,
my younger brother; poymale, brother and sister.

anetana, ano etana, my brother’s son (said by a woman after his death).

inihi: inihimale, husband and wife, wife and husband, male and female. This is
usually employed for wife.

inifa, the usual term for husband.

taca: tacamale, husband and wife, wife and husband, male and female of fant
beings only.

aymantanica, sister’s son (used by a woman after his death); aymantana, name
given to the deceased son of the preceding, also a deceased near relative dearly loved;
aymanino neletema, a dearly loved deceased chief (so called by both men and women).

ano quelana, or anona, ‘‘my relative,’’ covers those of the same house, lineage, or
parent by the female side.

The following terms and sentences given by Pareja also have a
bearing on the social organization of the Timucua:

titi nocoromale, those who are natives or of one country.

hica nocoromale, those who are of one town.

paha nocoromale, those who are of one house.
“ hica niahobale, hica nicorobale, we are of one town.

paha niocoralebale, we are all of one house.

ano quela niyahobale, we are of one lineage, caste, or generation; ano quela chiya-
hobale, thou art of one lineage, caste, or generation; ano quela yahomale, they are of
one lineage, caste, or generation.

ano quela chichaquene?, of what lineage are you?

ano chichaquene chitacochianomi (or chitaco anoya)?, who are your kindred?

ano virona, elapachana, names by which relatives and brothers and sisters call
each other.

anonia male, elapacha male, brothers and sisters, and male and female kinsmen
so speak to each other.

elapacha, anomalema, ano oquomi, ano oquo malema, indicate common relation-
ship.

ubua, name given to a widow or widower by all of the relatives of the deceased.

ocorotasiqino, name given to all of those descended from two lineages.

siquita pahana, all of those descended from one lineage or parentage, if it is in the
male line.

ucucanimi, distant relationship.

anocomalema, master and vassal, slave, male or female, and master, and master
and male or female servant.

ano quelamalema, ano pequatamale, master and servant and master and vassal.

atemalema, lord and slave, male or female (when master is placed first the word
for master is used, and when servant is placed first the term for servant is used).!

While the relationships expressed by the terms given above seem
at first sight very complicated the majority are reducible into a few
comparatively simple categories which are expressed in the following
tables. Terms applied to individuals belonging to the same clan as
self are italicized.

1 Pareja, Cathecismo, en lengua Castellana y Timuquana, pp. 107-128.

a eo

eee

_ SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 367
SELF MALE
: I
paternal paternal maternal maternal
grandfather grandmother grandfather ae grandmother
(itora) | (nibira) (itora) | (nibira)
| |
father’s father’s father mother ol ae mother’s == mo’s
sister brother (iti) (isa) sister brother bro’s
(nibi) (itele) (isale) (neba) wife
| (nebepatani)
fath’s sis’ chil. | l I
(ama, eqeta, elder yr. bro. self elder yr. sis. mo’s bro’s
aruqul, or brother (amita) (male) sis. (amita or children
qisotimi) (hiosa, (yacha acha (qiena)
Ba ti miso) quianima)
brother’s child child sister’s child
(qiena) (qiena) (coni)
; |
grandchild
(quisito)
il
father-in-law mother-in-law
(ano nasimita) (ano nasimita)
ae et ee (or itora)
|
’ brother’s === brother Ue | | |
wife self —===_ wife wife’s wife’s sister’s
( emitana) (male) (inihi) sister husband
sister’s sister (yamemitana) (iquilnona)
husband
(yame)
| |
daughter-in-law=son daughter SS son-in-law
(nubo, nubuo) (nasi)
SELF FEMALE \
I
paternal paternal maternal maternal
grand father- grandmother grandfather grandmother
(itora) | (nibira) (itora) | (nibira)
| |
See ae ae fattlor’s father uti) mother (isa) mother’s mother’s = mo’sbro’s
busband sister brother sister brother wife
(itora) (nibi) (itele) (isale) (neba) (neba-
patani)
father’s a8 younger self elder younger mother’s
sister’s brother brother (female) sister sister brother’s
children (poy) (poy) (nihona) (amita) children
(ama, eqeta, + (yachina?) (ebo)
aruqui
qisotami) Sey wg
brother’s child child sister’s
(ebo) (ule) child
ce)
grandchild
(quisito)
II
father-in-law =—=— mother-in-law
(ano nasimita, (ano nasimita,
he or eaeal nubuomitana, nubuomitana)
brother’s ‘te or itora) |
wife — a self husband husband’s husband’s
(niquisa) ; (female) (inihi?) brother sister
sister’s sister (tafimitana) (niquisamitana)
husband
(yame) i
daughter-in-law —=——= son daughter ——— son-in-law
(nubuo, nubo) (nasi)

868 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Some points are obscure but the outlines of the organization are
perfectly clear. There was one term for both father’s father and
mother’s father, and from what we know of Indian tribes elsewhere it
is probable that this term was extended generally to designate the
old men of the tribe. A complementary term was used for grand-
mother, employed in precisely the same ways. There was one term
for father and one for mother, but, with the addition of a syllable, these
were made to apply to the father’s brothers and the mother’s sisters,
respectively. From experience with other types of organization we
may feel sure that they were used for the men and women of the
father’s and mother’s clans of their generation also. There was aterm
for mother’s brother and a term for father’s sister, each of which
probably had similar clan extensions. While pronounced differently
these two, neba and nibi, have a most suggestive similarity. There
were terms for elder brother, younger brother, elder sister, and
younger sister. The sister, however, made less distinction between
the elder and the younger brother than did the brother between his
elder and younger sister. These terms likewise included_elder and
younger brothers and sisters of the father’s brothers and the mother’s
sisters. There was one term for the child of self whether male or
female, and by the man this term was used for the brothers’ children and
for the mother’s brothers’ children as well. The name used for her
children by a woman, however, was applied only to them and to the
children of her sisters. On the other hand, she called by one term,
which we may compare to our nephew or niece, the children of her
brothers and of her mother’s brothers, while the man’s corresponding
term applied only to his sisters’ children. There was one term for
grandchild of wide application and a term for father’s sister’s
child. From the nature of the terms used I will hazard a guess that
it was from this last group that husbands and wives were selected.
Regarding in-law relationships this much is certain, that there was one
distinct term for son-in-law and another for daughter-in-law. The
terms for father-in-law and mother-in-law are based upon these.
The terms used for brother-in-law and sister-in-law seem to have been
as follows: one for the individual of the opposite sex on either side
(tafi), one for the husband of a man’s sister and probably for the
brother of his wife, and one for the wife of a woman’s brother and
the sister of her husband. Most of the other terms are descriptive.

The influence of the clan system on the extension of these terms
would probably be evident if Pareja had taken the trouble to give
more extended information, but it is by no means necessary that it
should belong to a tribe having exogamous groups. The terms for
erandfather, grandmother, and grandchild probably have no con-
nection with clans. The terms for father’s brother and mother’s
sister, which are modifications of those for father and mother, might

ee tn r
y

ae aE a

ee ee

£ .
er More ht aes tars

AN a He meme aime OU aap ee 2

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 369

equally well be used by tribes with clans or without clans, and when
we get to the next generation we find the children of the father’s
brothers and those of the mother’s sisters called alike by the same
terms as the own brothers and sisters. They might all belong to the
same clan, it is true, but only in case there were but two exogamous
groups in the tribe or in case Pareja has merely recorded the terms
used in such cases: Distinction of descent as between father and
mother is carefully preserved also in the generation succeeding, a
man calling his brothers’ children by the same terms as his own chil-
dren, and a woman her sisters’ children by the same names as her
own children, while the sisters’ children and brothers’ children, re-
spectively, receive still other terms. Of course this might indicate
exogamous groups, as it is probable there would be a feeling against
intermarriage between persons calling themselves brothers and sis-
ters, but unless we suppose, as already stated, only two exogamous
groups there is no reason why the children of brothers should belong
to the same clan. The mother’s brother’s child is called by the same
name as his own child by a man and by the same name as her brother’s
child by a woman. These two terms suggest a clan organization
more strongly than any others, but do not establish it. The individ-
uals of these classes might have been categorized together without
any further extension of the terms. If we assume but two exogamous
groups among the Timucua the above terms will fall in with it harmoni-
ously, but there is every reason to suppose that there were more;
and, such being the case, we find that many groups of persons re-
ceive one name not because they are of one clan but because they
bear a certain blood relation to self or because their parents had
received a certain name. With more than two clans the children of
brothers are not necessarily of oneclan. If they then call each other
brothers and sisters it is evidently on account of the relationship
between their fathers. I call my brothers’ children by the same
name as mine, although they may belong to several clans, simply
because their fathers are my brothers. Precisely this classification
is found among the Creeks, except that with them a term is used
which distinguishes my actual children from the children of my clan
brothers. Both, however, convey the significance of ‘‘my son”’ or
‘‘my boy,”’ and the distinction introduced does not follow clan lines.
One includes my actual children; the other children of my clansmen,
whether they are of the same clan as my children or not.

We have several documentary statements regarding the existence
of matrilineal descent and the inheritance of the sister’s son. All
beyond this that we know of the clan system of the Timucua is con-
tained in the following paragraphs of Pareja, which I quote from
Gatschet’s translation with one or two small corrections. It occurs
in the original immediately after the terms of relationship.

148061 °—22 24

370 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

There are many other terms for degrees of kinship too prolix to be given here, and
I therefore mention only the most important. In the following lines I will mention
some of the principal lineages found in every part and province of the country, though
sometimes occurring in a different shape, and I begin with the pedigrees of the upper
chiefs and their progeny.

The upper chiefs (caciques), to whom other chiefs are subject, are called ano parucusi
holata ico (or olato aco; or utinama). From this class comes a councillor, who leads the
chief by the hand, and whose title is inchama. From him comes another class, that
of the anacotima; the cacique seeks the advice of these second councillors, when he
does not require that of the inihama. Another caste descends from the anacotima; it
is that of the second anacotima, and from these the afetama derive themselves. Another
class (of councillors) usually accompanies the iniha, who forms the first degree after
the head-chief; this class is the ibitano class. From the ibitano a line proceeds, that
affords councillors; this line is called toponole, and from them spring the ibichara.

From the last named proceed the amalachini, and the last lineage that traces its
origin to the head chief is itorimitono, to which little respect is paid. But all the other
classes, mentioned before this last, are held in high consideration; they do not inter-
marry, and although they are now Christians, they remain observers of these caste
distinctions and family pedigrees.

Of a further line derived from the upper chief all members call and consider each
other as ‘‘nephews.’’ This is the line of the White Deer, honoso nayo. In the provinces
of the ‘‘Fresh Water” and Potano, all these lineages emanating from the chief are
termed people of the Great Deer, quibiro ano. Families sprung from former chiefs are:
oyorano fiyo chuluquita oconi, (or simply) oyolano.

The lower pedigrees of the common people are the ‘‘Dirt (or Earth) pedigree,’’.

utihasomi enatiqi; the Fish pedigree, cwyuhasomi, and its progeny,’ called cuyuhasomt
aroqui, cuyuhasomiele, while its progenitors are termed tucunubala, irihibano, apichi.

Another strange lineage is that of the Buzzard, apohola; from it descend those of the
nuculaha, nuculahaquo, nucula-haruqui, chorofa, usinaca, ayahanisino, napoya, amaca-
huri, ha-uenayo, amusaya. These lineages all derive themselves from the apohola and
do not intermarry.

Still another pedigree is that of the chulufichi; from it is derived the arahasomi or
Bear pedigree, the habachaca and others, proceeding from this last.

From the acheha derives itself the Lion family or hiyaraba, the Partridge line or
cayahasomi, and others, as the efaca, hobatine, quasi, chehelu. In some districts these
lineages are of low degree, while in others they rank among the first, and since it
would be mere loss of time to give more, the above may suflice.!

Two different classifications seem to be represented here, of which
the second is plainly along the line of clans, and the groups probably
were in fact clans similar to those of the Creeks. The first, however,
indicates a kind of aristocratic system which appears to have been
based on male descent and recalls somewhat the special privileges
accorded to children and grandchildren of ‘‘Suns’”’ among the Natchez.
Perhaps these ‘lineages’? were actually associated with clans,
just as the henihas among the Creeks were drawn from a certain clan,
and among some towns the tastenagis and imalas were largely from
definite clans. Since the ending -ma of inihama is probably the plural,
it is quite possible or even probable that the inihama were the Timu-
cua equivalents of the Creek henihalgi. We find that linked clans

1 Pareja, Cathecismo, pp. 130-133; Gatschet in Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., xv, pp. 492-493,

* gad fet SM <

Ny
ie

EMS Be PR traps

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 371

or phratries existed among the Timucua. The word for clan appears
to have been hasomi. Pareja mentions six phratries—that of the
White Deer, or Great Deer, which seems to have been that to which
the chief usually belonged in the provinces best known to him; the
Dirt or Earth phratry; the Fish phratry; the Buzzard (or Vulture,
aura) phratry; the Chulufichi phratry; and the Acheha phratry.
Some of their subdivisions are also given by Pareja.

The aristocratic nature of Timucua government is apparent from
the statements of the French already referred to as well as from the
information regarding their social organization recorded by Pareja.

From Pareja’s Catechism it appears that chiefs were allowed to
exact tribute and labor from their subjects, and that by way of
punishment they sometimes had the arms of their laborers broken.
From the same source we learn that just before assuming the chief-
tainship a man had a new fire lighted and maintained for six days
in a small house or arbor which was closed up with laurels and ‘“ other
things.” The chiefs wore at times long painted skins, the ends of
which were held up from the ground by attendants. Le Moyne
figures this* and the custom is directly confirmed by Laudonniére,
whose testimony there is no reason to doubt; otherwise we might
regard it as something drawn from the customs of European courts
and falsely attributed to the Floridians. These skins were often
presented to the French as marks of esteem.‘ In giving out drinking
water the bearer observed ‘‘a certain order and reverence’’ to each.®

As intimated above, the country appears to have been divided
between a limited number of head chiefs, under each of whom were a
very much greater number of local chiefs. These little confederacies
may have been of the nature of some of the larger Creek groups which
consisted of a head town and a number of outsettlements.

From Laudonniére we learn that, like Indian tribes generally,
the ancient Floridians observed taboos with reference to women at
the time of their monthly periods and when a child was born. He
implies that when a woman was pregnant she lived in a house apart
from that of her husband. The men would not eat food touched by
a menstruant Woman.*®

Of their marriages the same writer says:

They marry, and every one hath his wife, and it is lawful for the king to have two
or three, yet none but the first is honored and acknowledged for queen, and none but
the children of the first wife inherit the goods and authority of the father.”

1 Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., Xvi, pp. 489, 490.

2 Tbid., p. 490.

3 Le Moyne, Narrative, pl. 39.

4 Laudonniére, La Floride, pp. 72-73; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 228.
5 Laudonnieére, ibid., p. 74; French, ibid., p. 229.

6 Laudonniére, ibid., pp. 8-9; French, ibid., p. 172.

7 Laudonniére, ibid., p. 8; French, ibid., p. 172,

372 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The marriage of a chief was consummated in a great ceremony,
to which Le Moyne devotes two of his illustrations ' and the following
descriptions:

When a king chooses to take a wife, he directs the tallest and handsomest of the
daughters of the chief men to be selected. Then a seat is made on two stout poles
and covered with the skin of some rare sort of animal, while it is set off with a struc-
ture of boughs, bending over forward so as to shade the head of the sitter. The queen
elect having been placed on this, four strong men take up the poles and support them
on their shoulders, each carrying in one hand a forked wooden stick to support the
pole at halting. Two more walk at the sides, each carrying on a staff a round screen
elegantly made, to protect the queen from the sun’s rays. Others go before, blowing
upon trumpets made of bark, which are smaller above and larger at the farther end
and having only the two orifices, one at each end. They are hung with small oval
balls of gold, silver, and brass, for the sake of a finer combination of sounds. Behind
follow the most beautiful girls that can be found, elegantly decorated with necklaces
and armlets of pearls, each carrying in her hand a basket full of choice fruits and
belted below the navel and down to the thighs with the moss of certain trees, to
cover their nakedness. After them come the bodyguards.

With this display the queen is brought to the king in a place arranged for the pur-
pose, where a good-sized platform is built up of round logs, having on either side a
long bench where the chief men are seated. The king sits on the platform on the
right-hand side The queen, who is placed on the left, is congratulated by him on
her accession and told why he chose her for his first wife. She, with a certain modest
majesty, and holding her fan in her hand, answers with as good a grace as she can.
Then the young women form a circle without joining hands and with a costume dif-
fering from the usual one, for their hair is tied at the back of the neck and then left
to flow over the shoulders and back; and they wear a broad girdle below the navel,
having in front something like a purse, which hangs down so as to cover their nudity.
To the rest of this girdle are hung ovals of gold and silver, coming down upon the
thighs, so as to tinkle when they dance, while at the same time they chant the praises
of the king and queen. In this dance they all raise and lower their hands together.’

Le Challeux says that ‘each has his own wife, and they protect
marriage indeed very rigorously,’’? from which it would seem that
laws similar to those of the Creeks were in force among them.

Two other sketches of Le Moyne illustrate the ceremonies under-
gone by widows; and they are thus explained:

The wives of such as have fallen in war or died by disease are accustomed to get
together on some day which they find convenient for approaching the chief. They
come before him with great weeping and outcry, sit down on their heels, hide their
faces in their hands, and with much clamor and lamentation require of the chief
vengeance for their dead husbands, the means of living during their widowhood, and
permission to marry again at the end of the time appointed by law. The chief, sym-
pathizing with them, assents, and they go home weeping and lamenting, so as to
show the strength of their love for the deceased. After some days spent in this
mourning they proceed to the graves of their husbands, carrying the weapons and
drinking cups of the dead, and there they mourn for them again and perform other
feminine ceremonies. .. .

After coming to the graves of their husbands they cut off their hair below the ears
and scatter it upon the graves, and then cast upon them the weapons and drinking

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, pls. 37, 38. + Gaffarel, Hist, Floride frangaise, p. 461,
2 Tbid., pp. 13-14 (ill.).

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 873

shells of the deceased, as memorials of brave men. This done they return home, but
are not allowed to marry again until their hair has grown long enough to cover their
shoulders.!

Regarding the division of labor between the sexes, there seems to
have been little difference between the Timucua and Creeks. Lau-

donniére says that ‘the women do all the business at home;”? and
Le Moyne indicates that the men prepared the ground for planting,
while the women made holes and dropped in the seed.*

Le Moyne has the following to say of berdaches:

Hermaphrodites, partaking of the nature of each sex, are quite common in these
parts, and are considered odious by the Indians themselves, who, however, employ
them, asthey are strong, instead of beasts of burden. When achief goes out to war the
hermaphrodites carry the provisions. When any Indian is dead of wounds or disease,
two hermaphrodites take a couple of stout poles, fasten cross-pieces on them, and at-
tach to these a mat woven of reeds. On this they place the deceased, with askin under
his head, a second bound around his body, a third around one thigh, a fourth around
oneleg. Why these are so used I did not ascertain; but I imagine by way of ornament,
as in some cases they do not go so far, but put the skin upon one leg only. Then they
take thongs of hide, three or four fingers broad, fasten the ends to the ends of the poles,
and put the middle over their heads, which are remarkably hard; and in this manner
they carry the deceased to the place of burial. Persons having contagious diseases
are also carried to places appointed for the purpose on the shoulders of the hermaphro-
dites, who supply them with food, and take care of them until they get quite well
again.‘

As quoted above, he also speaks of the service rendered by these
persons in bringing food to the storehouses.*

The following regarding burial customs is from Laudonniére:

When a king dieth, they bury him very solemnly, and, upon his grave they set the
cup wherein he was wont to drink; and round about the said grave, they stick many
arrows, and weep and fast three days together, without ceasing. All the kings which
were his friends make the like mourning; and, in token of the love which they bear
him, they cut off more than the one-half of their hair, as well men as women. During
the space of six moons (so they reckon their months), there are certain women ap-
pointed which bewail the death of this king, crying, with aloud voice, thrice a day—
to wit, in the morning, at noon, and at evening. All the goods of this king are put into
his house, and, afterwards, they set it on fire, so that nothing is ever more after to be
seen. The like is done with the goods of the priests; and, besides, they bury the
bodies of their priests in their houses, and then set them on fire.®

The mourning rites for persons of the lower orders are not given,
but from Pareja it appears that the custom of cutting off the hair
was universal.” He also informs us that some object was placed with
the body in the tomb.’ In the narrative of De Gourgues’s expedition

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 8.

2 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 8; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 172.

3 Le Moyne, op. cit., p. 9 (ill.).

4Tbid., pp. 7-8 (Ill.).

5 See p. 361.

6 Laudonniére, La Floride, pp. 10-11; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, pp. 173-174.
7 Pareja, Confessionario en Lengua Castellana y Timuquana, p. 127.

874 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Olotocara, the nephew of Saturiwa, is said to have begged De Gour-
gues ‘‘ to give unto his wife, if he escaped not, that which he had meant
to bestow on him, that she might bury the same with him, that
thereby he might be better welcome unto the village of the souls or
spirits departed.” Le Moyne says:

When a chief in that province dies, he is buried with great solemnities; his drinking-
cup is placed on the grave, and many arrows are planted in the earth about the mound
itself. His subjects mourn for him three whole days and nights, without taking any
food. All the other chiefs, his friends, mourn in like manner; and both men and
women, in testimony of their love for him, cut off more than half their hair. Besides
this, for six months afterwards certain chosen women three times every day, at dawn,
noon, and twilight, mourn for the deceased king with a great howling. And all his
household stuff is put into his house, which is set on fire, and the whole burned up
together.

In like manner, when their priests die, they are buried in their own houses; which
are then set on fire, and burned up with all their furniture.”

A manuscript, copies of which are to be found in both the Lowery
and Brooks collections, contains an interesting account of the burial
customs of the Tocobaga Indians. It is entitled ‘‘ Notes and Annota-
tions of the Cosmographer, Lopez de Velasco,” and the part which
concerns the Tocobaga runs thus:

When one of the principal caciques dies, they cut him to pieces and cook him in
large pots during two days, when the flesh has entirely separated from the bones,
and adjust one to another until they have formed the skeleton of the man, as he was
in life. Then they carry it to a house which they call their temple. This operation
lasts four days and during all this time they fast. At the end of the four days, when
everything is ready, all the Indians of the town get together and come out with the
skeleton in procession, and they bury it with the greatest show and reverence. Then
they say that all those who have participated in the ceremonies gain indulgencies.*

The skill displayed by these Indians in debate is testified to by
Spark.* Laudonniére and Le Moyne describe at considerable length
their method of holding councils. Laudonniére says:

They take no enterprise in hand, but first they assemble oftentimes their council
together, and they take very good advisement before they grow to aresolution. They
meet together every morning in a great common house, whither their king repaireth,
and setteth him down upon a seat, which is higher than the seats of the others; where
all of them, one after another, come and salute him; and the most ancient begin their
salutations, lifting up both their hands twice as high as their face, saying, Ha, he, ha!
and the rest answer, Ah, ah! As soon as they have done their salutation, every man
sitteth him down upon the seats which are round about in the house. If there be
anything to entreat of, the king calleth the lawas, that is to say, their priests and the
most ancient men, and asketh them their advice. Afterward, he commandeth
cassine to be brewed, which is a drink made of the leaves of acertain tree. They drink
this cassine® very hot; he drinketh first, then he causeth to be given thereof to all of them,

1 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 216; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 356.

3 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 15 (Il.).

3 Brooks MSS., Lib. Cong., translated by Miss Brooks,

4 Hakluyt, Voyages, Mm, p. 613.

6 Le Challeux spells the word cassinet.—Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 462.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 875

one after another, in the same bowl, which holdeth well a quart-measure of Paris.
They make so great account of this drink, that no man may taste thereof, in this assem-
bly, unless he hath made proof of his valorin the war. Moreover, this drink hath such
a virtue, that, as soon as they have drunk it, they become all of a sweat, which sweats
being past, it taketh away hunger and thirst for twenty-four hours after.!

Le Moyne’s account, as usual inserted to accompany a sketch, is
as follows:

The chief and his nobles are accustomed during certain days of the year to meet
early every morning for this express purpose in a public place, in which a long bench
is constructed, having at the middle of it a projecting part laid with nine round trunks
of trees for the chief’s seat On this he sits by himself, for distinction’s sake, and
here the rest come to salute him, one at a time, the oldest first, by lifting both hands
twice to the height of the head and saying, ‘‘Ha, he, ya, ha, ha.’’ To this the rest
answer, ‘‘Ha, ha.’’ Each, as he completes his salutation, takes his seat on the bench.
If any question of importance is to be discussed, the chief calls upon his laiias (that
is, his priests) and upon the elders, one at a time, to deliver their opinions. They
decide upon nothing until they have held a number of councils over it, and they
deliberate very sagely before deciding. Meanwhile the chief orders the women to
boil some casina, which is a drink prepared from the leaves of a certain root [plant],
and which they afterwards pass through a strainer. The chief and his councillors
being now seated in their places, one stands before him, and spreading forth his
hands wide open asks a blessing upon the chief and the others who are to drink.
Then the cup bearer brings the hot drink in a capacious shell, first to the chief and
then, as the chief directs, to the rest in their order, in the same shell. They esteem
this drink so highly that no one is allowed to drink it in council unless he has proved
himself a brave warrior. Moreover, this drink has the quality of at once throwing
into a sweat whoever drinks it. On this account those who can not keep it down,
but whose stomachs reject it, are not intrusted with any difficult commission or any
military responsibility, being considered unfit, for they often have to go three or four
days without food; but one who can drink this liquor can go for twenty-four hours
afterwards without eating or drinking. In military expeditions, also, the only sup-
plies which the hermaphrodites carry consist of gourd bottles or wooden vessels
full of this drink. It strengthens and nourishes the body, and yet does not fly to
the head, as we have observed on occasion of these feasts of theirs.”

To these accounts of the regular gatherings I will add one of the
ceremony attending a meeting between one of the Florida chiefs,
Saturiwa, and the French. The usual form of friendly greeting
consisted in rubbing the body of the visitor, seemingly a continent-
wide method of salutation.’

The king [Saturiwa] was accompanied by seven or eight hundred men, handsome,
strong, well made, and active fellows, the best trained and swiftest of his force, all
under arms as if on a military expedition. Before him marched fifty youths with
javelins or spears, and behind these and next to himself were twenty pipers, who
produced a wild noise without musical harmony or regularity, but only blowing
away with all their might, each trying to be the loudest. Their instruments were
nothing but a thick sort of reed or cane, with two openings, one at the top to blow
into and the other end for the wind to come out of, like organ pipes or whistles. On

1 Laudonniére, La Floride, pp. 9-10; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, pp. 172-173. Strangers of note were
treated to this drink and given cornte eat.—Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 407.

2 Le Moyne, Narrative, pp. 11-12 (ill.).

§ Anonymous writer in Gaffarel, Hist. Floride frangaise, p. 404.

376 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (put. 73

his right hand limped his soothsayer, and on the left was his chief counsellor, without
which two personages he never proceeded on any matter whatever. He entered
the place prepared for him alone [an arbor made of boughs] and sat down in it after
the Indian manner—that is, by squatting on the ground like an ape or any other
animal. Then, having looked all around and having observed our little force drawn
up in line of battle, he ordered MM. de Laudonniére and d’Ottigny to be invited
into his tabernacle, where he delivered to them a long oration, which they under-
stood only in part.!

All of the French chroniclers relate that these chiefs were preceded
by men who built arbors for them to sit in when holding council,
and Ribault speaks of arbors constructed both for the Indian chief
and for the French, distant two fathoms.? Other boughs were
spread upon the ground, on which they squatted cross-legged.

Le Moyne thus describes the preparations for an ordinary social
feast:

At the time of year when they are in the habit of feasting each other, they employ
cooks, who are chosen on purpose for the business. These, first of all, take a great
round earthen vessel (which they know how to make and to burn so that water can
be boiled in it as well asin our kettles), and place it over a large wood fire, which one
of them drives with a fan very effectively, holding it in the hand. The head cook
now puts the things to be cooked into the great pot; others put water for washing
into 2 holein the ground; another brings water in a utensil that serves for a bucket;
another pounds on a stone the aromatics that are to be used for seasoning; while the
women are picking over or preparing the viands.?

The native institution with which the authorities which we depend
upon had most to deal was, not unnaturally, war, and 10 of Le
Moyne’s 42 sketches deal with it in one way or another. Some of
these do not bring in native customs and need not be referred to,
but the remainder give us our best information on the subject.
Timucua weapons consisted of bows and arrows, darts, and clubs,
the last of a type different from the Creek dtasa, if we may trust
the illustrations. ‘‘A chief who declares war against his enemy,”’
says Le Moyne, ‘‘does not send a herald to do it, but orders some
arrows, having locks of hairs fastened at the notches, to be stuck
up along the public ways.” + He gives the following account of
the manner in which Saturiwa set out to war against his enemy,
Utina:

He assembled his men, decorated, after the Indian manner, with feathers and
other things, in a level place, the soldiers of Laudonniére being present, and the
force sat down in a circle, the chief being in the middle. A fire was then lighted
on his left and two great vessels full of water were set on hisright. ‘Then, the chief,
after rolling his eyes as if excited by anger, uttering some sounds deep down in his

throat, and making various gestures, all at once raised a horrid yell; and all his sol-
diers repeated this yell, striking their hips and rattling their weapons. Then the

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 3. 3 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 11 (ill.).
2 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 171. 4 Ibid., p. 13 (ill.).

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 877

chief, taking a wooden platter of water, turned toward the sun and worshiped it,
praying to it for victory over the enemy, and that, as he should now scatter the water
that he had dipped up in the wooden platter, so might their blood be poured out.
Then he flung the water with a great cast up into the air, and as it fell down upon
his men he added, ‘‘As I have done with this water, so I pray that you may do with
the blood of your enemies.’’ Then he poured the water in the other vase upon the
fire and said, ‘‘So may you be able to extinguish your enemies and bring back their
scalps.’’ Then they all arose and set off by land, up the river, upon their expedition.}

The following is Laudonniére’s version of this ceremony:

When he [Saturiwa] was sitting down by the river’s side, being compassed about
with ten other paracoussies, he commanded water to be brought him speedily. This
done, looking up into heaven, he fell to discourse of divers things, with gestures
that showed him to be in exceeding great choler, which made him one while shake
his head hither and thither; and, by and by, with, I wot not what fury, to turn his
face toward the country of his enemies, and to threaten to killthem. He oftentimes
looked upon the sun, praying him to grant him a glorious victory of his enemies;
which, when he had done, by the space of half an hour, he sprinkled, with his hand,
a little of the water, which he held in a vessel, upon the heads of the paracoussies,
and cast the rest, as it Were, in a rage and despite, into a fire, which was there pre-
pared forthe purpose. This done, he cried out, thrice, He Thimogoa! and wasfollowed
with five hundred Indians, at the least, which were there assembled, which cried,
all with one voice, He Thimogoa! Thisceremony, asa certain Indian told me, famil-
iarly, signified nothing else but that Saturiwa besought the Sun to grant unto him so
happy a victory, that he might shed his enemies’ blood, as he had shed the water at
his pleasure. Moreover, that the paracoussies, which were sprinkled with a part of
that water, might return with the heads of their enemies, which is the only, and
chief, triumph of their victories.”

We learn from Pareja’s Catechism that before they set out on an
expedition the warriors bathed in certain herbs.*

Provisions were carried along by women, young boys, and berdaches,
but frequently it seems to have been confined to parched corn.‘

The following descriptions of the conduct of a Florida war expedi-
tion accompany three of Le Moyne’s sketches, but may very prop-
erly be run together:

When Saturiwa went to war his men preserved no order, but went along one after
another, just as it happened. On the contrary, his enemy, Holata Outina, whose
name, as I now remember, means ‘‘king of many kings,’’ and who was much more
powerful than he as regards both wealth and number of his subjects, used to march
with regular ranks, like an organized army; himself marching alone in the middle
of the whole force, painted red. On the wings, or horns, of his order of march were
his young men, the swiftest of whom, also painted red, acted as advanced guards and
scouts for reconnoitering the enemy. These are able to follow up the traces of the
enemy by scent, as dogs do wild beasts; and, when they come upon such traces, they
immediately return to the army to report. And, as we make use of trumpets and

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 5 (ill.).

2 Laudonniére, La Floride, pp. 98-99; French, Hist. Colls. La., pp. 251-252.

3 Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., XVI, p. 637.

4 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 141; French, op. cit., p.291. Spark probably means parched corn by ‘‘ the head
ofmaiz roasted”’ on which he says they “will travel a whole day.”

378 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULN. 73

drums in our armies to promulgate orders, so they have heralds, who by cries of
certain sorts direct them to halt, or to advance, or to attack, or to perform any other
military duty. After sunset they halt, and are never wont to give battle. For en-
camping, they are arranged in squads of ten each,! the bravest men being put in squads
by themselves. When the chief has chosen the place of encampment for the night,
in open fields or woods, and after he has eaten, and is established by himself, the
quartermasters place ten of these squads of the bravest men in a circle around him.
About ten paces outside of this circle is placed another line of twenty squads; at
twenty yards farther, another of forty squads; and so on, increasing the number and
distance of these lines, according to the size of the army.

At no time while the French were acting along with the great chief Holata Outina
in his wars against his enemies, was there any combat which could be called a regular
battle; but all their military operations consisted either in secret incursions, or in
skirmishes as light troops, fresh men being constantly sent out in place of any who
retired. Whichever side first slew an enemy, no matter how insignificant the person,
claimed the victory, even though losing a greater number of men. In theirskirmishes,
any who fall are instantly dragged off by persons detailed for the purpose; who, with
slips of reeds sharper than any steel blade, cut the skin of the head to the bone, from
front to back, all the way round, and pull it off with the hair, more than a foot and
a half long, still adhering, done up in a knot on the crown, and with that lower down
round the forehead and back cut short into a ring about two fingers wide, like the
rim of a hat. Then, if they have time, they dig a hole in the ground, and make a
fire, kindling it with some which they keep burning in moss, done up in skins, and
carry round with them at their belts; and then dry these scalps to a state as hard as
parchment. They also are accustomed, after a battle, to cut off with these reed knives
the arms of the dead near the shoulders, and their legs near the hips, breaking the
bones, when laid bare, with a club, and then to lay these fresh broken, and still
running with blood, over the same fires to be dried. Then hanging them, and the
scalps also, to the ends of their spears, they carry them off home in triumph. I used
to be astonished at one habit of theirs—for I was one of the party which Laudonniére
sent out under M. d’Ottigny—which was, that they never left the field of battle
without shooting an arrow as deep as they could into the arms of each of the corpses
of the enemy, after mutilating them as above—an operation which was sometimes
sufficiently dangerous, unless those engaged in it had an escort of soldiers. * * *

After returning from a military expedition they assembled in a place set apart for
the purpose, to which they bring the legs, arms, and scalps which they have taken
from the enemy, and with solemn formalities fix them up on tall poles set in the ground
inarow. Then they all, men and women, sit down on the ground in a circle before
these members; while the sorcerer, holding a small image in his hand, goes through a
form of cursing the enemy, uttering in a low voice, according to their manner, a thou-
sand imprecations. At the side of the circle opposite to him there are placed three
men kneeling down, one of whom holds in both hands a club, with which he pounds on
a flat stone, marking time to every word of the sorcerer. At each side of him the other
two hold in each hand the fruit of a certain plant, something like a gourd or pumpkin,
which has been dried, opened at each end, its marrow and seeds taken out, and then

mounted on a stick, and charged with small stones or seeds of some kind. These they

rattle after the fashion of a bell, accompanying the words of the sorcerer with a kind of
song aftertheirmanner. They have such a celebration as this every time they take any
of the enemy.’

In the particular case of the expedition by Saturiwa against
Thimogoa Laudonniére says that after having attacked one of the
enemies’ towns successfully and taken 24 prisoners, they

1 Laudonniére says they were encamped six by six.—La Floride, p. 141.
2 Le Moyne, Narrative, pp. 6-7 (ill.).

—————

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 879

retired themselves immediately into their boats, which waited for them. Being come
thither, they began to sing praises unto the Sun, to whom they attributed their victory.
And, afterwards, they put the skins of those heads on the ends of their javelins, and
went all together toward the territories of Paracoussy Omoloa, one of them which was in
the company. Being come thither, they divided their prisoners, equally, to each of
the paracoussies, and left thirteen of them to Saturiwa, which straightway dispatched
an Indian, his subject, to carry news before of the victory to them which stayed at
home to guard their houses, which immediately began to weep. But as soon as night
was come, they never left dancing, and playing a thousand gambols, in honor of the
feast.

The next day the Paracoussy Saturiwa came home, who, before he entered into his
lodging, caused all the scalps of his enemies to be set up before his door, and
crowned them with branches of laurel, showing, by this glorious spectacle, the
triumph of the victory which he had obtained. Straightway began lamentation and
mourning, which, as soon as the night began, were turned into pleasures and dances.}

Some captives were probably tortured to death, as was threatened in
the case of the Spaniard, Juan Ortiz, who was ‘‘bound hand and foot
to four stakes, and laid upon scaffolding, beneath which a fire was
kindled, that he might be burned.”’ ”

One of Laudonniére’s lieutenants was witness of a ceremony
intended to keep in mind the injuries which his people had received
in times past from their enemies. It consisted in the mock killing of
one of his family and subsequent wailing over him. This was per-
formed only when they returned from a war expedition without the
heads of their enemies or any captives.’

Le Moyne thus describes Floridian fortified towns:

A position is selected near the channel of some swift stream. They level it as even
as possible, and then dig a ditch in a circle around the site, in which they set thick
round pales, close together, to twice the height of a man; and they carry this paling
some ways past the beginning of it, spiralwise, to make a narrow entrance admitting
not more than two persons abreast. The course of the stream is also diverted to this
entrance; and at each end of it they are accustomed to erect a small round building,
each full of cracks and holes, and built, considering their means, with much elegance.
In these they station as sentinels men who can scent the traces of an enemy at a great
distance, and who, as soon as they perceive such traces, set off to discover them. As
soon as they find them, they set up a cry which summons those within the town to the
defence, armed with bows and arrows and clubs. The chief’s dwelling stands in the
middle of the town, and is partly underground, in consequence of the sun’s heat.
Around this are the houses of the principal men, all lightly roofed with palm branches,
as they are occupied only nine months in the year; the other three, as has been related,
being spent in the woods. When they come back, they occupy their houses again,

_ and if they find that the enemy has burned them down, they build others of similar

materials... .

For the enemy, eager for revenge, sometimes will creep up by night in the utmost
silence, and reconnoiter to see if the watch be asleep. If they find everything silent,
they approach the rear of the town, set fire to some dry moss from trees, which they

1 Laudonniére, La Floride, pp. 100-101; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, pp. 253-254.
2 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 28.
8 Laudonniére, La Floride, pp. 93-97; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, pp. 248-249.

380 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY >. Ronee

prepare in a particular manner, and fasten to the heads of their arrows. They then
fire these into the town, so as to ignite the roofs of the houses, which are made of palm
branches thoroughly dried with the summer heats. As soon as they see that the roofs
are burning, they make off as fast as possible, before they are discovered, and they
move so swiftly that it is a hard matter to overtake them; and meanwhile also the fire
is giving the people in the town enough to do to save themselves from it and get it
under. Such are the stratagems used in war by the Indians for firing the enemy’s
towns; but the damage done is trifling, as it amounts only to the labor required for
putting up new houses.

But when the burning of a town has happened in consequence of the negligence of
the watch, the penalty is as follows: The chief takes his place alone on his bench,
those next to him in authority being seated on another long bench curved in a half
circle; and the executioner orders the culprit to kneel down before the chief. He
then sets his left foot on the delinquent’s back; and, taking in both hands a club of
ebony [?] or some other hard wood, worked to an edge at the sides, he strikes him on
the head with it, so severely as almost to split the skull open. The same penalty is
inflicted for some other crime reckoned capital among them; for we saw two persons
punished in this same way.!

When fishing in a certain lake in their country the people of
Potano set a watch to protect the fishermen.” News of the approach
of an enemy was conveyed by means of smoke signals.’

The following notes regarding war are from Laudonniére:

The kings of the country make war, one against another, which is not executed
except by surprise, and they kill all the men they can take; afterwards they cut off
their heads, to have their hair, which, returning home, they carry away, to make
thereof their triumph when they come to their houses. They save the women and
children, and nourish them, and keep them always with them. Being returned
home from the war, they assemble all their subjects, and, for joy, three days and three
nights, they make good cheer, they dance and sing; likewise, they make the most
ancient women of the country to dance, holding the hairs of their enemies in their
hands, and, in dancing, they sing praises to the sun, ascribing unto him the honor
of the victory. ... When they go to war, théir king marcheth first, with a club
in one hand, and his bow in the other, with his quiver full of arrows. While they
fight, they Bake great cries and exclamations.*

The valor and skill of Timucua warriors is also well attested by
the chroniclers of the expedition of De Soto. What is said about
their method of treating captives shows at once that slavery was
not institutional among them. In the fight which Laudonniére’s
men had with Utina the Indians displayed great skill, discharging
their arrows by squads and throwing themselves on the ground
when the Frenchmen aimed at them.®

That fighting with bows and arrows was an art in itself is shown
by this description of the Fidalgo of Elvas:

The Indians are exceedingly ready with their weapons, and so warlike and nimble
that they have no fear of footmen; for if these charge them they flee, and when

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 12 (ill.).

2 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 142; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 291.

3 Bourne, Narr, of De Soto, I, p. 22; Le Challeux in Gaffarel, Hist. Floride francaise, p. 460.
¢ Laudonniére, op. cit., pp. 7-8; French, op. cit., p. 171.

6 Laudonniére, op. cit., p. 166; French, op. cit., pp. 313-314,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 381

they turn their backs they are presently upon them. They avoid nothing more
easily than the flight of an arrow. They never remain quiet, but are continually
running, traversing from place to place, so that neither crossbow nor arquebuse can
be aimed at them. Before a Christian can make a single shot with either, an Indian
will discharge three or four arrows; and he seldom misses of his object. Where the
arrow meets with no armor, it pierces as deeply as the shaft from a crossbow.!

Regarding games Laudonniére says:

They exercise their young men to run well, and they make a game, among them-
selves, which he winneth that hath the longest breath. They also exercise them-
selves much in shooting. They play at the ball in this manner: They set up a tree
in the midst of a place, which is eight or nine fathoms high, in the top whereof there
is set a square mat, made of reeds, or bullrushes, which whosoever hitteth in playing
thereat winneth the game.” ;

And Le Moyne:

Their youth are trained in running, and a prize is offered for him who can run
longest without stopping; and they frequently practise with the bow. They also
play a game of ball, as follows: In the middle of an open space is set up a tree some
eight or nine fathoms high, with a square frame woven of twigs on the top; this is to
be hit with the ball, and he who strikes it first gets a prize.®

To be sure Le Challeux remarks, ‘‘they never teach their children
and do not correct them in any way;”* but '. is referring to the
training of young children in matters connected with morals and
manners.

According to our French informants the sun and moon were the
principal objects of adoration among these Indians, particularly
the former.® This probably means that their beliefs were sub-
stantially like those of the Creeks and Chickasaw. A side light
on their cult is furnished in the following account of a ceremony
by Le Moyne:

The subjects of the Chief Outina were accustomed every year, a little before their
spring—that is, in the end of February—to take the skin of the largest stag they could
get, keeping the horns on it; to stuff it full of all the choicest sorts of roots that grow
among them, and to hang long wreaths or garlands of the best fruits on the horns,
neck, and other parts of the body. Thus decorated, they carried it, with music and
songs, to a very large and splendid level space, where they set it up on a very high
tree, with the head and breast toward the sunrise. They then offered prayers to the
sun, that he would cause to grow on their lands good things such as those offered him.
The chief, with hissorcerer, stands nearest the tree and offers the prayer; the common
people, placed at a distance, make responses. Then the chiefand all the rest, saluting

the sun, depart, leaving the deer’s hide there until the next year. This ceremony
they repeat annually.®

Pareja says that there were many different ceremonies, varying
from tribe to tribe, and he mentions one called ‘“‘the ceremony of

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, pp. 25-26.

2 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 7; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 171.
3 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 13 (ill.).

4 Gaffarel, Hist. Floride francaise, p. 461.

5 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 171; Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 8.
5 Le Moyne, op. cit.

sco BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the laurel performed to serve the Demon.”* When passing a ledge
in the ocean where surf broke, the Timucua Indian whistled to it so
that he would not be upset, and he also whistled to the storm to
make it stop?

If we may believe Le Moyne, the high opinion in which chiefs were
held had resulted in a kind of chief cult accompanied by human
sacrifice.

Their custom is to offer up the first-born son to the chief. When the day for the
sacrifice is notified to the chief, he proceeds to a place set apart for the purpose, where
there is a bench for him, on which he takes hisseat. In the middle of the area before
him is a wooden stump two feet high, and as many thick, before which the mother
sits on her heels, with her face covered in her hands, lamenting the loss of her child.
The principal one of her female relatives or friends now offers the child to the chief
in worship, after which the women who have accompanied the mother form a circle,
and dance around with demonstrations of joy, but without joining hands. She who
holds the child goes and dances in the middle, singing some praises of the chief.
Meanwhile, six Indians, chosen for the purpose, take their stand apart in a certain
place in the open area; and midway among them the sacrificing officer, who is deco-
rated with a sort of magnificence, and holdsaclub. The ceremonies being through,
the sacrificer takes the child, and slays it in honor of the chief, before them all, upon
the woodenstump. The offering was on one occasion performed in our presence.*

This suggests, in away, therites and customs of the Natchez Indians.

Elvas declares that human sacrifice existed also among the people
of Tampa Bay:

The Indians are worshippers of the devil, and it is their custom to make sacrifices
of the blood and bodies of their people, or of those of any other they can come by;
and they affirm, too, that when he would have them make an offering, he speaks,
telling them that he is athirst, and that they must sacrifice to him.*

As an example of the reverence which they paid to particular
objects may be cited their treatment of the column set up by Ribault
in 1562. When Laudonniére saw it three years later it was ‘‘ crowned
with crowns of bay, and, at the foot thereof, many little baskets
full of mill fi. e., corn], which they call in their language tapaga
tapola. Then, when they came hither, they kissed the same with
great reverence, and besought us to do the like.’’®

Le Moyne says of this:

On approaching, they found that these Indians were worshipping this stone as an
idol; and thechief himself, having saluted it with signs of reverence such as his sub-
jects were in the habit of showing to himself, kissedit. His men followed his example,
and we wereinvited todothesame. Before the monument there lay various offerings
of the fruits, and edible or medicinal roots, growing thereabouts; vessels of perfumed
oils; a bow, and_arrows; and it was wreathed around from top to bottom with flowers
of all sorts, and boughs of the trees esteemed choicest.®

The Spaniards speak of temples among some Timucua tribes, but
it is probable that these were identical with the town houses men-

1 Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., Xv, p. 491. 5 Laudonniére, La Floride, pp. 69-70; French,
2 Ibid., XVI, p. 637. Hist. Colls. La., p. 224.
3 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 13. 6 Le Moyne, Narrative, p. 4 (ill.).

4 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, pp. 29-30.

——

cok ogc "RCE “

.
La
rf

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 388

tioned by the French, although their situation with respect to the
town was not always central; and, moreover, they were sometimes
placed upon mounds. Thus Elvas says that there was such a temple
in the town of Ucita at the opposite end from the house of the chief.
On the top was a wooden fowl with gilded eyes, ‘‘and within were
found some pearls of small value, injured by fire, such as_ the Indians
pierce for beads.” ' The temple of Tocobaga was in this section of
Florida? and Tocobaga and Ucita may in fact have been the same place.

Pareja’s Confessionario gives us considerable insight into the
smaller superstitions and taboos shared by the people as a whole,
which compensate in some degree for a lack of more detailed informa-
tion regarding tribal beliefs and ceremonies. When a kind of owl
hooted it was believed to be saying something and it was appealed to for
help. If this owl or another variety called the ‘‘red owl” (mochuelo)
hooted they said, ‘‘Do not interrupt it or it will do you harm.” It
was thought to be an omen, and usually one of evil. If a person
uttered a cry when woodpeckers were making a noise it was thought
he would have nosebleed. If one heard the noise made by a fawn he
must put herbs into his nostrils to keep from sneezing, and if he did
sneeze he must go home and bathe in an infusion of herbs or he
would die. When one jay chattered to another it was a sign that a
visitor was coming. In winter the small partridge (la gallina
pequefia) must not be eaten. When a snake was encountered,
either on a country trail or in the house, it was believed to portend
misfortune. When the fire crackled it was considered a sign of war,
and war was also forecasted from lightning. Belching either por-
tended death or else was a sign that there would be much food.
Dreams were believed in.

Omens were also drawn from the tremblings or twitchings of differ-
ent parts of the body. Such a trembling sometimes indicated that
a visitor was coming. If one’s eyes trembled it portended weeping.
If his mouth twitched it was a sign that something bad was going to
happen to the individual, or that people were saying something about
him, or that a feast was to take place.

There were many food taboos. The first acorns or fruits gathered
were not eaten. The corn in a cornfield where lightning had struck
was not eaten, nor the first ripened corn. The first fish caught in
a new fishweir was not eaten, but laid down beside it so that a great
quantity of fish would come into it with the next tide. It was
thought that if the first fish caught in such a weir were thrown into
hot water, no other fish would be caught. After eating bear’s meat

- they drank from a different shell than that ordinarily used so that

they would not fall sick. When a man had lost his wife, a woman her

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 23. 3 Barcia, La Florida, p. 127,

384 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

husband, or either a relative, they would not eat corn which had been
sowed by the deceased or corn from land which he or she had been
wont to sow, but would give it to some one else or have the crop
destroyed. After attending a burial a person bathed and abstained
for some time from eating fish. Before tilling a field an ancient
ceremony was recited to the shaman (1. e., probably under his leader-
ship). Prayer was offered—that is, a formula was repeated—over
the first corn, and when the corncrib was opened a formula was
recited over the first flour. A ceremony accompanied with formule
was performed with laurel when chestnuts (?) and palmetto berries
were gathered, nor were wild fruits eaten until formule had been
repeated over them. Perhaps this applied only to the first wild
fruits of the season. Corn from a newly broken field was not sup-
posed to be eaten, apparently, though it is hard to believe that this
regulation was absolute. Unless prayers had been offered to the
‘‘spirit’”’ by a shaman, no one was allowed to approach or open the
corncrib. Some ceremony is mentioned which took place early in the
sowing season, in which six old men ate a pot of ‘‘fritters.”’

When a party was to go out hunting the chief had formule repeated
over tobacco, and when the hunting ground was reached all of the
arrows were laid together and the shaman repeated other formule
over them. It was usual to give the shaman the first deer that was
killed. Before fishing on a lake formule were also recited, and after
the fish were caught the shaman prayed over them and was given
half. The first fish caught, however, was, after the usual formule,
placed in the storehouse. Pareja also mentions a kind of hunting
ceremony performed by kicking with the feet, probably some form of
sympathetic magic, and it appears that not a great deal of flesh was
eaten immediately after hunting for fear that no more animals would
be killed. It was also thought that no more game would be killed if
the lungs and liver of an animal were thrown into cold water for
cooking. If a hunter pierced an animal with an arrow without kill-
ing it he repeated a formula over his next arrow, believing that it was
then sure to inflict amortal wound. If the grease of partridges or other
small game which had been caught with a snare or lasso was spilled it
was thought that the snare would catch nothing more. Formule
were uttered to enable hunters to find turtles. Bones of animals
caught in a snare or trap were not thrown away but were hung up
or placed on the roof of the house. If this ceremony were omitted
it was thought that the animals would not enter the snare or trap
again. When they went to hunt deer they took the antlers of another
deer and repeated formule over them. If a man went to his fishweir
immediately after having had intercourse with his wife he thought
that no more fish or eels would enter it.

EEE

vves

a a ee

ee. Oe eee

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 385

At the time of her monthly period and for sometime after her con-
finement a woman did not eat fish or venison. It was also considered
wrong for her to anoint herself with bear grease or eat fish for a number
of moons after having given birth. Both at that time and at the
menstrual period she must not make a new fire or approach one.

A gambler rubbed his hands with certain herbs in order that he
might be fortunate in play. <A runner is also said to have taken an
herb to make him win, and this seems to have been in the form of a
drink.’

The only reference to a future state of existence is in the account
of De Gourgues’s expedition, and it has been given already.’

Regarding priests or shamans there is information both from
Laudonniére and Le Moyne. The former says:

They have their priests, to whom they give great credit, because they are great
magicians, great soothsayers, and callers upon devils. These priests serve them
instead of physicians and surgeons; they carry always about with them a bag full
of herbs and drugs, to cure the sick who, for the most part, are sick of the pox.*

Le Moyne thus describes the ceremony gone through by an aged
shaman in order to forecast the fortunes of chief Utina’s expedition
against the Potano:

The sorcerer . . . made ready a place in the middle of the army, and, seeing
the shield which D’Ottigny’s page was carrying, asked to take it. On receiving it,
he laid it on the ground, and drew around it a circle, upon which he inscribed various
characters and signs. Then he knelt down on the shield, and sat on his heels, so
that no part of him touched the earth, and began to recite some unknown words in a
low tone, and to make various gestures, as if engaged in a vehement discourse. This
lasted for a quarter of an hour, when he began to assume an appearance so frightful
that he was hardly like a human being; for he twisted his limbs so that the bones
could be heard to snap out of place, and did many other unnatural things. After
going through with all this he came back all at once to his ordinary condition, but in
a very fatigued state, and with an air as if astonished; and then, stepping out of his
circle, he saluted the chief, and told him the number of the enemy, and where they
were intending to meet him.4

We may add that according to both Laudonniére and Le Moyne
the event verified the prediction.
Le Moyne thus describes how the sick were cared for:

Their way of curing diseases is as follows: They put up a bench or platform of suffi-
cient length and breadth for the patient . . . and lay the sick person
upon it with his face up or down, according to the nature of his complaint; and,
cutting into the skin of the forehead with a sharp shell, they suck out blood with
their mouths, and spit it into an earthen vessel or a gourd bottle. Women who are

! Pareja, Confessionario en Lengua Castellana y Timuquana, pp. 123-133; Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., XVI,
pp. 635-638; xvn, pp. 500-501; xvm1, pp. 489-491.

2 See p. 374.

3 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 8; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, pp. 171-172.

«Le Moyne, Narrative, pp. 5-6 (ill.).

148061°—22 25

386 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

suckling boys, or who are with child, come and drink this blood, particularly if it is
that of a strong young man; asit is expected to make their milk better, and to render
the children who have the benefit of it bolder and more energetic. For those who
are laid on their faces they prepare fumigations by throwing certain seeds on hot coals;
the smoke being made to pass through the nose and mouth into all parts of the body, and
thus to act as an emetic, or to overcome and expel the cause of the disease. They have
acertain plant, whose name has escaped me, which the Brazilians call petum [petun],
and the Spaniards tapaco. The leaves of this, carefully dried, they place in the wider
part of a pipe; and setting them on fire, and putting the other end in their mouths,
they inhale the smoke so strongly, that it comes out at their mouths and noses, and
operates powerfully to expel the humors. In particular they are extremely subject
to the venereal disease, for curing which they have remedies of their own, supplied
by nature.?

Ribault mentions among the presents which his people received
from the Indians “roots like rinbabe [rhubarb], which they hold in
great estimation, and make use of for medicine?

Pareja sheds a great deal of light on the activities of shamans.
As we have seen, the shaman prayed over the new corn. He also per-
formed ceremonies to find a lost object, and he brought on rain and
tempest. He was asked to pray over a new fishweir so that many
more fish would enter. When it thundered, in order to keep back
the rain, he would blow toward the sky and repeat formule. Pareja
explains that in cases of sickness the native doctors were accustomed
to place a kind of cupping glass over the affected part and then
suck it, afterwards exhibiting a little piece of coal, earth, or ‘‘ other un-
clean thing,” or something alive or which appeared to be alive.
This evidently quite impressed the good father, who attributed the
performance to the devil. The doctor would also place white feath-
ers, new skins (‘‘chamois”’), and the ears of an owl before a sick per-
son and thrust arrows into the soil there, saying that he would draw
out the disease as he withdrew the arrows. Sharp practice was
evidently well known among these primitive physicians. We are
informed that when a sick person was getting better he prepared
“food of a sort of cakes or fritters or other things”’ and shouted out
after the doctor that he had cured him. Otherwise it was thought
that the disease would reappear. A shaman was also known to
threaten that the people would all be killed unless they gave him
something to avert a calamity which he declared was threatening.
Sometimes he injured a person whom he considered had not paid
him enough. He is also accused of having caused delay in childbirth
at times so that he would be called in and paid well to hasten the de-
livery; or, when he had been called, it is alleged that he would make
the patient suffer more until he was paid what he thought he ought
to receive. The principle of the ‘‘hold up” was thus well recognized
among Timucua doctors.

1 Le Moyne, Narrative, pp. 8-9 (ill.). 2 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1875, p. 177.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 387

It appears that when a man fell sick a new house was built for him,
probably only a temporary affair, and a new fire was also made at
which his food was cooked. Perhaps part of the motive for this was
to protect the principal dwelling in case of the sick man’s death, for
it was usual to burn the houses of chiefs and shamans at such times.
Formule were also repeated over the sick. Some sickness was
attributed to witchcraft and herbs were used to counteract the effects.
When foot races were held herbs were sometimes used to cause a rival
to faint. The Timucua wizard, who desired to cause the death of a
person, used in his incantations the skin of a “viper” and that of a
black snake, along with part of the “ black guano”’(a kind of palm tree)
and other herbs. While he was going through his incantations he
would not eat fish, cut his hair, or sleep with his wife. When the per-
son he was trying to kill died the wizard bathed and broke his fast.
If the victim did not die it seems to have been thought that the incan-
tation would react upon the wizard himself and kill him. Instead of
killing a person the wizard sometimes injured him in some particular
part, such as the feet. Witchcraft was also resorted to to attract the
regard of a person of the opposite sex. Sometimes this was effected
by getting an herb into the person’s mouth and by the use of certain
songs. To bring back the affections of her husband a woman
bathed in an infusion of certain herbs. For the same purpose she
tinged her palm-leaf hat with the juice of an herb, or she did this to
induce another person to fall in love with her. Fasting was resorted
to with the same intention.!

Notes conveying specific information regarding’ the ethnology of
the Calusa, Tekesta, and Ais Indians of southern Florida are few.
An early Spanish writer, Gov. Mendez de Can¢o, writing in 1598
or 1599, says that the Indians of southern Florida did not live in set-
tled villages because they had no corn, but wandered about in search
of fish and roots. Fontaneda, whose information dates from a very
early period, has the following to say about the Indians of Calos:

These Indians possess neither gold nor silver, and still less clothing, for they go
almost nakéd, wearing only a sort of apron. The dress of the men consists of braided
palm leaves, and that of the women of moss, which grows on trees and somewhat
resembles wool. Their common food consists of fish, turtles, snails, tunny fish, and
whales, which they catch in their season. Some of them also eat the wolf fish, but
this is not a common thing, owing to certain distinctions which they make between
food proper for the chiefs and that of their subjects. On these islands is found a shell-
fish known as the langosta, a sort of lobster, and another known in Spain as the chapin
(trunk fish), of which they consume not less than the former. There are also on the

islands a great number of animals, especially deer; and on some of them large bears
~are found.?

1 Pareja, op. cit.; Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., xv, pp. 500-501.
2 Doc. Ined., Vv, pp. 532-533.

888 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

A later writer says that the Calusa Indians wore gold and other
metal on their foreheads, but this was a custom general in the penin-
sula.!

The people in the interior of the country about Lake Okeechobee,
which was called by them ‘“‘the little ocean,’ ! were probably related
to these Calusa. Fontaneda speaks of them thus:

This lake [Mayaimi] is situated in the midst of the country, and is surrounded by a
great number of villages of from thirty to forty inhabitants each, who live on bread
made from roots during most of the year. They can not procure it, however, when the
waters of the lake rise very high. They have roots which resemble the truffles of this
country [Spain], and have besides excellent fish. Whenever game is to be had, either
deer or birds, they eat meat. Large numbers of very fat eels are found in the rivers,
some of them as large as a man’s thigh, and enormous trout, almost as large as a man’s
body; although smaller ones are also found. The natives eat lizards, snakes, and
rats, which infest the lakes, fresh-water turtles, and many other animals which it
would be tiresome to enumerate. They live in a country covered with swamps and
cut up by high bluffs. They have no metals, nor anything belonging to the Old
World. They go naked, except the women, who wear little aprons woven of shreds
of palm. They pay tribute to Carlos, composed of all the objects of which I have
spoken, such as fish, game, roots, deer skins, etc.”

Still less is to be learned regarding the social organization and
religious beliefs of these people. From what has already been said
and from what Fontaneda and others relate elsewhere it is plain that
the chief of Calos was head chief either of a very large tribe or of a
sort of confederacy centering about Charlotte Harbor and San Carlos
Bay, that his power was similar to that of the Timucua chiefs, and
that here also there was a class of nobles. The riches and conse-
quently the power of the Calos chief ruling in the latter part of the
sixteenth century were greatly enhanced by the gold and silver cast
upon his coast in wrecked Spanish vessels from Mexico and Central
America. Jn Laudonniére’s time he had united spiritual with

political and social power, for that adventurer learned through a

Spaniard who had been a captive in the country of Calos that he
made his subjects believe—

that his sorceries and charms were the causes that made the earth bring forth her
fruit; and, that he might the easier persuade them that it was so he retired himself
once or twice a year to a certain house, accompanied by two or three of his most
familiar friends, where he used certain enchantments; and, if any man intruded him-
self to go to see what they did in this place, the king immediately caused him to be
put to death.

Moreover, they told me, that, every year, in the time of harvest, this savage king
sacrificed one man, which was kept expressly for this purpose, and taken out of the
number of the Spaniards, which, by tempest, were cast away upon that coast.®

This sacrifice is also mentioned by Barcia, but perhaps on Lau-
donniére’s authority.‘

1 Brooks and Lowery, MSS.

2 Doc. Ined., V, pp. 534-535.

2 Laudonniére, La Floride, p. 132; French, Hist. Colls. La., 1869, p. 282.
4 Barcia, La Florida, p. 94.

Vo ae Ps

Be AP MOF oe rw i Ry

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 3889

It is referred to at more length in the notes of Lopez de Velasco
from which we have already quoted.' He says:

The Indians of Carlos have the following customs:

First. Every time that the son of a cacique dies, each neighbor sacrifices (or kills)
his sons or daughters who have accompanied the dead body of the cacique’s son.

Second. When the cacique himself, or the caciqua [his wife] dies, every servant of
his or hers, as the case may be, is put to death.

Third. Each year they killa Christian captive to feed their idol, which they adore,
and they say that it has to eat every year the eyes of a man, and then they all dance
around the dead man’s head.

Fourth. Every year after the summer begins they make witches, in the shape of
devils with horns on their heads, howling like wolves, and many otheridols of different
kinds, who cry loud like wild beasts, which they remain four months. They never
rest, but on the contrary, they keep on the run with fury all the time, day and night.

The actions of these bestial creatures are worth relating.?

The following, also from the notes of Lopez de Velasco, is all that I
have been able to find regarding the customs of the Tekesta Indians.
This writer extends the term, however, to cover the entire southeast
coast of Florida as far as Cape Canaveral.

The Indians of Tegesta, which is another province extending from the Martires to
Canaveral, have a custom, when the cacique dies, of disjointing his body and
taking out the largest bones. These are placed in a large box and carried to the
house of the cacique, where every Indian from the town goes to see and adore them,
believing them to be their gods.

In winter all the Indians go out to sea in their canoes, to hunt forsea cows. One of
their number carries three stakes fastened to his girdle and a rope on hisarm. When
he discovers asea cow he throws his rope around its neck, and as the animal sinks under
the water, the Indian drives astake through one ofits nostrils, and no matter how much
it may dive, the Indian never loses it, because he goes onits back. After it has been
killed they cut open its head and take out two large bones, which they place in the
coffin, with the bodies of their dead and worship them.*

Concerning the other east coast peoples, the Jeaga and Ais, nothing is
to be had from Spanish sources, but this gap is in some degree filled
by the information contained in a small work entitled ‘‘ Narrative of
a Shipwreck in the Gulph of Florida: Showing, God’s Protecting
Providence, Man’s Surest Help and Defence in Times of Greatest
Difficulty, and Most Imminent Danger. Faithfully Related by One
of the Persons Concerned therein, Jonathan Dickenson.’’ This
describes the adventures of the passengers and crew of a vessel which
sailed from Port Royal, Jamaica, June 23, 1699, and was wrecked on
the east coast of Florida on July 23 folowing. The place where this
vessel struck was a few miles northward of an inlet called Hobe, now
known as Jupiter Inlet. The Indians stripped them of all of their
clothing and other possessions, but spared their lives. They took
them first to the town at Hobe, probably identical with Fontaneda’s

1 See p. 374. 3 Brooks MSS., Lib. Cong. Translated by Miss
3 Lowery and Brooks, MSS. Translated by Miss _ Brooks,
Brooks.

390 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Jeaga. Later they allowed them to travel northward toward St.
Augustine, which they reached September 15, after very great hard-
ships, from which a few died. After having been very well enter-
tained by the Spanish governor they set out northward again, reached
Charleston, S. C., October 26, and arrived at Philadelphia February 1.
The work is in the form of a diary, and proved so popular when it first
appeared that it went through a number of editions. Internal
evidence shows that great reliance may be placed upon it.

In their travels along the Florida coast, after leaving Hobe, this
party passed two Indian villages and came to a third called by the
Spaniards Santa Lucia, where a mission station was at one time estab-
lished, though there were no Spaniards there at the time. I have
already given reasons for identifying this place with the Guacata of
Fontaneda.'' From this place they were hurried away at midnight of
the second day, apparently at the command of the chief of Ais, who
lived about 20 miles to the northward, and after passing another
village they came to Ais in safety. Dickenson calls this place Jece,
but there is practically no doubt of its identity with the Ais of the
Spaniards. The chief of this town is said to have been chief of all the
towns from Santa Lucia to Ais and northward. He was even in a
position to domineer over the chief of Hobe, from whom he secured a
part of the plunder the latter had collected. At Ais the fugitives
found a party from another English vessel, and they remained one
month, when they were rescued by a Spanish coast patrol. Between
Ais and Mosquito Inlet they passed six inhabited towns and one that
had been abandoned. The two last occupied towns were large and
stood near together a little south of the inlet. Possibly they were
the towns called Mayarca and Mayajuaca by Fontaneda, which were
probably Timucua. Somewhere back of Cape Canaveral they came
upon the first Indian plantation and saw some pumpkins growing
there. This may have been about on the border between the Timucua
Indians and those of southern Florida, for Dickenson asserts that all
of those in the towns between Hobe and the place last mentioned
raised nothing.

The ethnological information which this work contains applies
almost entirely to the Indians of Hobe, Santa Lucia, and Ais—i. e.,
those called by Fontaneda Jeaga, Guacata, and Ais. It is probable
that their culture and language were the same, and very likely close
to those of the Calusa, and it is fortunate that from the Ais, who appear
to have had the greatest individuality, the largest part of this infor-
mation comes. On account of the evident likeness of these three
peoples I will place the material available together.

1 See p. 333.

Ned, a te pes

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 891

We find the following information regarding clothing. At Santa
Lucia, Dickenson writes:

In a little time some raw deer skins were brought in, and given to my wife and
negro woman, and to us men, such as the Indians wear, being a piece of plaitwork of
straws, wrought of divers colours, and of a triangular figure, with a belt of four fingers
broad of the same, wrought together, which goes about the waist; and the angle of the
other having a thing to it coming between the legs; and strings to the end of the belt,
all three meeting together, are fastened behind with a horse tail, or a bunch of silk
grass, exactly resembling it, of a flaxen colour; this being all the apparel or covering
that the men wear.!

This article of male attire is, of course, the breechclout. It is
described less at length as worn by the two Hobe Indians who first
met our travelers after their shipwreck. Dickenson adds that ‘“ they
had their hair tied in a roll behind, in which stuck two bones, shaped
one like a broad arrow, the other like a spearhead.” ?

The town of Hobe is described as “being little wigwams made of
small poles stuck in the ground, which they bent one to another,
making an arch, and covering them with thatch of small palmetto
leaves.””* The chief’s house was “about a man’s height to the top,”’
and within was a platform bed ‘‘made with sticks, about a foot
high, covered with a mat.’’* The chief’s house in Santa Lucia ‘‘ was
about forty feet long, and twenty-five feet wide, covered with
palmetto leaves, both top and sides. There was a range of cabins
[beds] on one side and two ends; at the entering on one side of the
house, a passage was made of benches on each side, leading to the
cabins.”’ 4

The chief of Hobe, to make a rude wind break, ‘‘got some stakes
and stuck them in a row joiming to his wigwam, and tied some sticks,
whereon were small palmettoes tied, and fastened them to the stakes
about three feet high, and laid two or three mats, made of reeds,
down for shelter.”’ ®

The floors of the houses were the bare earth, covered, however,
with filth and vermin.®

The beds, as has been noticed, were provided with mats, and
Dickenson mentions among certain -articles presented to the chief
of Santa Lucia ‘‘some plaited balls stuffed with moss to lay their
heads on instead of pillows.’’?

Pots, including ‘‘a deep round bowl,’’* and baskets are mentioned,
also a “‘bag made of grass.’’® Cooked fish was served to the white
people on palmetto leaves. Gourds were also used.

1 Dickenson, Narrative, pp. 33-34. 6 Ibid., p. 34.
2 Tbid., pp. 9-10 7 Ibid., p. 37.
3 Ibid., p. 17. 8 Tbid., p. 35.
4 Tbid., p. 33. 9 Tbid., p. 54,

®Tbid., p. 18,

399 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [punn. 73

Regarding their economic life, the following statement will hold for
all of these towns:

These people neither sow nor plant any manner of thing whatsoever, nor care for
any thing but what the barren sands produce. Fish they have as plenty as they
please.!

The castaways thus describe one, and what appears to have been
the most common, way of fishing:

The Cassekey [of Hobe] sent his son with his striking staff to strike fish for us, which
was performed with great dexterity; for some of us walked down with him, and
though we looked very earnestly when he threw his staff from him, we could not see
a fish at the time he saw it, and brought it to shore on the end of his staff. Sometimes
he would run swiftly pursuing a fish, and seldom missed when he darted at it; in two
hours time he got as many fish as would serve twenty men.’

The striking staff or spear was the ordinary fishing implement;
what purpose the bow and arrow served other than that of war is not
apparent. One night, shortly after the fishing performance that has
just been described, some Indians were seen fishing from a canoe
by means of a torch. The fish brought to the whites are said to
have been ‘‘boiled with the scales, heads, and gills, and nothing
taken from them but the guts.’’* At one place they were given
oysters to eat and at another clams, and they were instructed
how to roast them. The vegetable food of the people of Ais con-
sisted principally of ‘‘palm berries [species uncertain], coco-plums
[Chrysobalanus icaco], and sea grapes [Coccoloba wvifera] . . . the
time of these fruits bearing being over they have no other till the
next spring.’’* The two latter suited the palates of the whites very
well, but the palm berries they could not endure, and this is not
surprising, since, according to Dickenson’s testimony, they ‘‘ could
compare them to nothing else but rotten cheese steeped in tobacco
juice.”’7 They are spoken of in each of the principal towns which
they visited, however, and were evidently a staple article of diet with
the natives. The Indians provided water for the whites, and very
likely for themselves, by scratching holes in the sand.

These Indians occupied a thin strip of shore backed by swamps
and dense undergrowth and do not seem to have ventured far inland.
Their means of transportation and intercommunication were dugout
canoes, used more often in the long narrow lagoons of that coast
than on the open ocean, and often poled rather than paddled.* In-
deed some of these were almost too small for outside work; the cast-
aways were ferried across to Hobe in one just wide enough to sit

1 Dickenson, Narrative, p. 51. 6 Tbid., p. 51. For the identifications I am in-
2 Tbid., p. 19. debted to Lieut. W. E. Safford, of the Bureau of
3 Ibid., p. 29. Plant Industry, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
4 Ibid., p. 36. 7 Tbhid., pp. 37-38.

5 Thid., pp. 23, 36 8 Ibid., p. 17.

8 Ibid., p. 48.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 893

down in.!. On certain occasions, especially when large burdens were
to be carried, two canoes were lashed side by side but some distance
apart, poles were laid across to make a platform, and mats were
placed on top of this.?

Tobacco was very much valued by these people, but apparently not
cultivated by them. ‘‘A leaf, or a half a leaf of tobacco, would pur-
chase a yard of linen or woolen, or silk, from the Indians.”” Ambergris,
found along their coast, was so little esteemed that an Indian of Ais,
“having a considerable quantity of ambergris, boasted that when he
went for St. Augustine with that he could purchase of the Spaniards
a looking glass, an axe, a knife or two, and three or four mannocoes,
which is About five or six pounds of tobacco; the quantity of amber-
gris might be about five pounds weight.” *

The little that we learn resending the private life of these people,
their manners and customs, does not set them forth in a very engaging
light. That they should plunder the white people of their posses-
sions was to have been expected, and the latter were lucky to have
escaped with their lives, but their treatment of them in small matters
shows them to have been deceitful, overbearing, unfeeling, and cow-
ardly. They mocked and insulted them in every manner, and upon
one occasion an Indian filled the mouth of Dickenson’s infant son with
sand. They made fun of two of the English who were seized with
fever and ague, and Dickenson goes on to remark that they treated
their own unfortunates as badly.

This we well observed, that these people had no compassion on their own aged
declining people when they were past labour, nor on others of their own which lay

under any declining condition; for the younger is served before the elder, and the
elder people, both men and women, are slaves to the younger.‘

This, it is to be observed, is sharply at variance with the treat-
ment of their old men by the Creeks. Nevertheless the English did
not want for some defenders and protectors in each town, and when
there was more than enough food for the Indians they had plenty.
As an example of primitive generosity in supplying at least the
essentials of existence to all may be cited one occasion at Ais when a
canoe laden with fish came in, ‘‘and it was free for those that would,
to take as much as they pleased. The Indians put us to go and take,
for it was a kind of scramble amongst us and the young Indian men
and boys. All of us got fish enough to serve us two or three days.’’®

In spite of the extreme primitiveness and simplicity of their culture
the town chief was treated with considerable respect and seems to
have exerted very great influence. His house is represented as the
largest in the town, and seems to have supplied the place of the public

' Dickenson, Narrative, p. 17. 4 Ibid., p. 55.

2 Tbid., p. 48. 6 Ibid., p. 56
3 Ibid., p. 60.

894 * BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY {puny 73

houses of the Timucua and Creeks, with which it may indeed have
been identical, since the chief among the Creeks was at the same time
guardian of the town house. The house of the Santa Lucia chief
has already been described. His own seat is placed ‘‘at the upper
end of the cabin” ;! but from the context it is evident that the middle
of the side farthest from the door is intended. The wording is in
somewhat archaic English and by no means clear, but we must
assume one of two arrangements as follows:

40 feet.

Cabins or beds.

“09 GS

Benches for Benches for
headmen. headmen.

40 feet.

Chief’s

Sent Cabins or beds.

Cabins or beds.

“qO9J GZ -

ee)
Po
ob
oS
Bo
on
ao

Benches for
headmen

In the first plan it does not seem natural that the head men should
sit on either side of the door, where in most tribes the slaves or in-
ferior persons were placed; in the second it does not seem natural
to break up the floor space, yet a similar order is met with in a
Cusabo town (see p. 64), and was probably the correct one. Daily
meetings were held here, in which the black drink was brewed and
imbibed in quantities, the custom resembling closely in its observances
that found among the Creeks. Dickenson describes it thus:

The Indians were seated as aforesaid, the cassekey at the upper end of them, and
the range of cabins was filled with men, women, and children, beholding us. At
length we heard a woman or two cry, according to their manner, and that very sorrow-
fully, one of which I took to be the cassekey’s wife; which occasioned some of us to
think that something extraordinary was to be done to us; we also heard a strange sort
of a noise, which was not like the noise made by a man, but we could not understand
what, nor where it was; for sometimes it sounded to be in one part of the house, and
sometimes in another, to which we had an ear. And indeed our ears and eyes could
perceive or hear nothing but what was strange and dismal, and death seemed to sur-
round us; but time discovered this noise to us. The occasion of it was thus:

In one part of this house, where a fire was kept, was an Indian man, having a pot on
the fire wherein he was making a drink of a shrub, which we understood afterwards

1 Dickenson, Narrative, pp. 33-34.

, rl eT |
——————————————— —————————

Se en es ee a Ne, See Oe ee TE eee eT Ss er ee ee ee ee ee eee ee eee

™

robe

SWANTON] PARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 395

by the Spaniards is called Casseena, boiling the said leaves, after they had parched
them ina pot; then with a gourd, having a long neck, and at the top of it a small hole,
which the top of one’s finger could cover, and at the side of it a round hole of two inches
diameter. They take the liquor out [of] the pot, and put it into a deep round bowl,
which being almost filled, contains nigh three gallons; with this gourd they brew the
liquor and make it froth very much; it looks of adeep brown colour. In the brewing
of this liquor was this noise made, which we thought strange; for the pressing of the
gourd gently down into the liquor, and the air it contained being forced out of a little
hole at the top, occasioned a sound, and according to the time and motion given, would
be various. The drink when made cool to sup, was in a shell first carried to the casse-
key, who threw part of it on the ground and the rest he drank up, and then made a
loud hem; and afterwards the cup passed to the rest of the cassekey’s associates as
aforesaid; but no other person must touch or taste of this sort of drink; of which they
sat sipping, chattering, and smoking tobacco, or some other herb instead thereof, for
the most part of the day. '

The evening festivities which followed were much after the same
style.

In the evening we being laid on the place aforesaid [on mats on the floor], the In-
dians made a drum of askin, covering therewith the deep bowl, in which they brewed
their drink, beating thereon with a stick; and having a couple of rattles made of a small
gourd, put on a stick with small stones in it, shaking it, they began to set up a most
hideous howling, very irksome to us; and some time after came many of their young
women, some singing, some dancing. This continued till midnight, after which they
went to sleep.”

All this was at the town of Santa Lucia, and there also the Penn-
sylvanians had an opportunity to observe the ceremony with which
an ambassador from another chief was received. In this case the
emissary was from the chief of Ais, who, as has been said, seems to
have been considered the superior of the chief of Santa Lucia and all
other chiefs in that region. Says Dickenson:

About the tenth hour we observed the Indians to be in a sudden motion, and the
principal part of them betook themselves to their houses; the cassekey went to dress-
ing his head and painting himself, and so did all the rest; after they had done, they
came into the cassekey’s house and seated themselves in order. Ina small time after
came an Indian with some small attendance into the house making a ceremonious
motion, and seated himself by the cassekey, and the persons that came with him
seated themselves amongst the others; after a small pause the cassekey began a dis-
course which held him nigh an hour, after which, thestrange Indian and his com-
panions went forth to the water side to their canoe, lying in the sound, and returned
presently with such presents as they had brought, delivering them to the cassekey and
those sitting by, giving an applause. The presents were a few bunches of the herb
they had made their drink of and another herb they use instead of tobacco, and some
plaited balls stuffed with moss to lay their heads on instead of pillows; the ceremony
being ended, they all seated themselves again and went to drinking casseena, smoking,
and talking during the stranger’s stay.*

Soon after several of the white people were themselves asked to
take seats in the cabin, beside the chief—an evident mark of honor.

1 Dickenson, Narrative, pp. 33-36. 3 Ibid., pp. 36-37.
2 Ibid., p. 36.

896 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [punn. 73

The chief of Ais was treated with still more respect by his own
people. Dickenson thus describes his return from Hobe, whither he
had gone in the hope of obtaining some of the things out of the
wrecked vessel:

We perceived he came in state, having his two canoes lashed together, with poles
across from one to the other, making a platform, which being covered with a mat, on
it stood a chest, which belonged to us, and my negro boy Cesar, that the cassekey of
Hoe-bay took from me, whom he had got from the Indians; upon this chest he sat
cross legged, being newly painted red, and his men with poles setting the canoe
along to the shore. On seeing us, he cried ‘‘ Wough,” and looked very stern at us.

He was received by his people with great homage, holding out his hands, as their
custom is, to be kissed, having his chest carried before him to his house, whither he
went, and the house was filled with Indians: the old cassekey began, and held a dis-
course for some hours, giving an account, as we suppose, what he heard and saw, in
which discourse he would often mention Nickaleer, which caused us to fear, that all
things were not well. After he had told his story, and some of the elder Indians had
expressed their sentiments thereon, they drank casseena, and smoked till evening.!

Some of these social customs, such, for instance, as the brewing of
the black drink, contain religious elements, but, beyond these, two
ceremonies are described which seem to have been primarily reli-
gious. The first took place the night after the arrival of our travel-
ers at Hobe. It is detailed thus:

Night being come and the moon being up, an Indian, who performed their cere-
monies, stood out, looking full at the moon, making a hideous noise, and crying out,
acting like a mad man for the space of half an hour, all the Indians being silent till he
had done; after which they made a fearful noise, some like the barking of a dog, wolf,
and other strange sounds; after this, one got a log and set himself down, holding the
stick or log upright on the ground, and several others got about him, making a hideous
noise, singing to our amazement; at length their women joined the concert, and made
the noise more terrible, which they continued till midnight.?

The first part was probably a shamanistic performance; the latter
may have been merely a social dance, the upright log being
really an extemporized drum. The second ceremonial took place at
Ais between the 18th and 25th of August and the account we have
of it is the only narrative in any way complete of an Ais ceremonial.
From the first sentence it might be thought that this was a monthly
ceremony, but there is no certainty. It strongly suggests the Creek
busk and probably belonged in the same class, though these people
did not raise corn and the date of celebrating it was a month or two
too late for a new-corn ceremony. The account follows:

It now being the time of the moon’s entering the first quarter the Indians had a
ceremonious dance, which they began about 8 o’clock in the morning. In the first
place came in an old man, and took a staff about 8 feet long, having a broad arrow

on the head thereof, and thence halfway painted red and white, like a barber’s pole.
In the middle of this staff was fixed a piece of wood, shaped like unto a thigh, leg,

1 Dickenson, Narrative, p. 48. aTpbid., p. 19.

Dea

ae ee

424

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 397

and foot of a man, and the lower part of it was painted black. This staff, being carried
out of the cassekey’s house, was set fast in the ground standing upright, which being
done he brought out a basket containing six rattles, which were taken out thereof
and placed at the foot of the staff. Another old man came in and set up a howling
like unto a mighty dog, but beyond him for length of breath, withal making a procla-
mation. This being done and most of them having painted themselves, some red,
some black, some with black and red, with their bellies girt up as tight as well they
could girt themselves with ropes, having their sheaths of arrows at their backs and
their bows in their hands, being gathered together about the staff, six of the chiefest
men in esteem amongst them, especially one who is their doctor, took up the rattles
and began an hideous noise, standing round the staff with their rattles and bowing to
it without ceasing for about half an hour. Whilst these six were thus employed all

_the rest were staring and scratching, pointing upwards and downwards on this and
the other side, every way looking like men frightened, or more like furies. Thus they
behaved until the six had done shaking their rattles; then they all began to dance,
violently stamping on the ground for the space of an hour or more without ceasing, in
which time they sweat in a most excessive manner, so that by the time the dance was
over, by their sweat and the violent stamping of their feet, the ground was trodden
into furrows, and by morning the place where they danced was covered with maggots;
thus, often repeating the manner, they continued till about 3 or 4 o’clock in the after-
noon, by which time many were sick and faint. Being gathered into the cassekey’s
house they sat down, having some hot casseena ready, which they drank plentifully
of, and gave greater quantities thereof to the sick and faint than to others; then they
eat berries. On these days they eat not any food till night.

The next day, about the same time, they began their dance as the day before; also
the third day they began at the usual time, when many Indians came from other
towns and fell to dancing, without taking any notice one of another. This day they
were stricter than the other two days, for no woman must look upon them, but if any
of their women went out of their houses they went veiled with a mat.!

The fact that the castaways had an abundance of fish and berries
to eat on the 25th probably had something to do with the ceremony,
feasting being a constant preliminary accompaniment of fasting.
The day after (1. e., the 26th) Dickenson says:

We observed that great baskets of dried berries were brought in from divers towns
and delivered to the king or young cassekey, which we supposed to be a tribute to the
king of this town, who is chief of all the towns from St. a Lucia to the northward of
this town of Jece.”

These presents were probably rather to discharge social obligations
or secure the good will of the chief than actual tribute, and it is to
be suspected that they had some connection with the ceremony just
concluded.

Altogether the culture of the people of Ais and the east Florida
coast generally seems to have belonged with that of Calos. Its
simplicity was partly due, without doubt, to the poverty of the
country; in fact, in later times the economic condition was con-
siderably advanced by frequent wrecks along the coast, though
at the same time native industry must have been proportionately

1 Dickenson, Narrative, pp. 52-54. 3Ibid., p. 54.

398 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

discouraged. The rather high position of the chief is probably
attributable in some degree to the influence of their neighbors on the

north and west.
THE SEMINOLE

The history of the Seminole is very well known in outline, and much
has been written regarding our famous Seminole war; yet it is evident
that much remains to be said, on the Indian side at least, before we
can have a clear understanding of the Seminole people and Seminole
history. The name, as is well known, is applied by the Creeks to
people who remove from populous towns and live by themselves,
and it is commonly stated that the Seminole consisted of ‘‘runaways”
and outlaws from the Creek Nation proper. A careful study of their
history, however, shows this to be only a partial statement of the
case.

Perhaps the best account we have regarding the beginnings of the
Seminole is by Bartram. The destruction of the Apalachee towns
in the manner elsewhere narrated! had partially cleared the way
for settlements in Florida by Indians from the north, and in the
period immediately succeeding bodies of them gradually pushed
southward from the large Creek towns on Chattahoochee River.
The first impulse toward Florida of any consequence began with that
great upheaval we have so often mentioned—the Yamasee war.
The Yamasee themselves entered Florida almost in a body, but they
arrived there as friends of the Spaniards, adding their strength to
the decaying forces of the original Floridian tribes, and themselves
shared in large measure the fate of those peoples—extermination or
expulsion from the country. At the same time a movement was
started which resulted in the invasion of the peninsula on its western
side, and this, deed, marks the real beginning of the Seminole.
Bartram gives an account of it in describing his journey from the
Savannah River to Mobile, and it has been reproduced in detailing
the history of the Oconee Indians.?

By consulting this it will be seen that the Oconee Indians were a
nucleus about which the Seminole Nation grew up. It is evident
that for a considerable period part of them remained near the Chat-
tahoochee, for they are recorded in the census of 1761 * and their
town is described by Hawkins in 1799.‘ It disappears in the interval
between 1799 and 1832, when the government census of Creeks was
taken, and probably all had then moved to Florida.’ Brinton says
that the first group of Seminole came into Florida in 1750, under a chief
named Secoffee.’ He was probably the one known to the English as

1 See pp. 121-123. 4 See p. 181.

2 See p. 180. 5 Brinton, The Floridian Peninsula, p. 145.
8 Ga. Col. Does., VI, p. 522.

Savas ths AE te =

VPN gchage etins,

VM xtige te

ee oe cry et

s
PPO Plas

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 8399

“the Cowkeeper,’’ mentioned in the quotation above from Bartram.
He appears in the Georgia Colonial Documents as living well toward
the south and spending most of his time in warring with the Span-
iards.'_ The Oconee chief who participated in Oglethorpe’s first gen-
eral Indian council was ‘“‘Oueekachumpa,” called by the English
“Long King.” ? It does not appear whether Secoffee was his suc-
cessor or merely the leader of those Oconee who went into Florida.
I do not know on what authority Brinton places the invasion of
Florida by Secoffee in 1750, but the date appears to be at least ap-
proximately correct, and is important as establishing the beginnings
of the Seminole as a distinct people. Fairbanks incorrectly states—
that is, if Secoffee is really the Cowkeeper of the English—that he
“left two sons, head chiefs, Payne and Bowlegs.’’* This is, of course,
an assumption natural to a white man, but descent was in the female
line among both Creeks and Seminole, and Cohen, who knew Indian
customs much better than Fairbanks, is undoubtedly correct when
he says that Cowkeeper was “‘uncle of old Payne.’”’* He adds that
the former had been given a silver crown by the British Govern-
ment for services during the American Revolution, from which we
know that he lived at least almost to the end of that struggle. Cohen
apparently contradicts himself in referring to these chiefs, but his
later statement appears to be correct, and from this it seems that
the Cowkeeper was succeeded by a chief known as “King Payne.’
Cohen says that he married a Yamasee woman.’ The grant of land
to Forbes & Co. made in 1811 in payment for debts contracted by the
Indians was signed among others by Payne for all of the Alachua
settlements and by Capitchy Micco [Kapitsa miko] for the Mikasuki.
In 1812, in revenge for depredations committed on the Georgia settle-
ments by these Indians, Colonel Newman, Inspector General of Flor-
ida, offered to lead a party against Payne’s town, which was still in
Alachua, and probably just where Bartram found it. In the fight
which ensued near that place King Payne was mortally wounded,
and many other Indians killed or wounded, but the invaders were

forced to retreat under cover of night. King Payne was succeeded

by his brother, Bowlegs, whose Indian name is given by Cohen as
Islapaopaya [opaya meaning ‘‘far away’’].° Cohen says that the
Alachua settlements were broken up in 1814 by the Tennesseeans and
Bowlegs was killed.?, At any rate about this time the Alachuas, or
part of them, moved farther south, and we presently find their head
chief, Mikonopi (‘Top Chief’’), the nephew of King Payne and Bow-

1 Ga. Col. Does., Vu, p. 626 et seq. *Ibid., p. 33.

2 Acct. Shewing the Progress of Ga., pp. 35-36. 6Ibid., pp. 35, 238.
3 Fairbanks, Hist of Fla., p. 174. 7Ibid., p. 35.

4Cohen, Notices of Florida, p. 238.

400 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

legs, living at Okihamki, just west of Lake Harris or Astatula.'| Mi-
konopi came as near being ‘“‘head chief of the Seminoles” as any
at the outbreak of the great Seminole war. We may therefore say
that the nucleus of the Seminole Nation was not merely a body of
‘outcasts’? as has been so often represented, but a distinct tribe,
the Oconee, affiliated, it is true, with the Creeks, but always on the
outer margin of the confederacy and to a considerable extent an
independent body, representing not the Muskogee but the Hitchiti
speaking peoples of southern Georgia—those who called themselves
Atcik-hata.?

The Hitchiti character of this Seminole nucleus comes out still
stronger when we turn to examine those towns established in the
wake of the Oconee invasion. The only early lists available are
those given by Bartram and Hawkins, which are as follows:

SEMINOLE TOWNS ACCORDING TO BARTRAM (1778) *

Suola-nocha.

Cuscowilla or Alachua.

Talahasochte.

Caloosahatche.

Great island.

Great hammock.

Capon. Traders’ names.
St. Mark’s.

Forks.

SEMINOLE TOWNS ACCORDING TO HAWKINS (1799) 4
Sim-e-no-le-tal-lau-has-see.
Mic-c-sooc-e.
We-cho-took-me.
Au-lot-che-wau.
Oc-le-wau thluc-co.
Tal-lau-gue chapco pop-cau.
Cull-oo-sau hat-che.

Hawkins says of the Seminole settlements enumerated by him:

These towns are made from the towns O-co-nee, Sau-woog-e-lo, Eu-fau-lau, Tum-
mault-lau, Pa-la-chooc-le and Hitch-e-tee.®

Of these six towns only Eu-fau-lau is certainly known to have be-
longed to the Muskogee proper, and one early writer represents this
as made up of outcasts from all quarters. We do not know the status
of Tum-mault-lau with certainty, but the form of the name itself,
the position which it occupied in very early times, and certain other

1 His residence is often given as Pilaklakaha, which appears to have been a Negrotownnear Okihamki.

2 See p. 172.

3 Bartram, Travels, p. 462.

4Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1, p. 25. A more nearly phonetic way of rendering the fifth would be Akla-
waha tako, and the sixth Talaa’lgi teapko popka (‘‘a place to eat cow or stock peas’’).

5 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls,, m, p. 25.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 401

considerations, all point to a connection with the Hitchiti-speaking
peoples.! The language of the Mikasuki in Oklahoma is so close to
that of the Hitchiti that they are commonly considered to be parts
of one people; and the following story regarding them was told to
me by Jackson Lewis, an old Hitchiti Indian, for whose opinions I
have the greatest respect. He said that the name was properly
Nikasuki.

The Nikasukis are precisely the same as the Hitchiti. In early days some Hitchiti
went hunting to a point where two rivers met. They found alligators there which
they ate, and when they came back they reported that they were good food. They
went many times, and finally they came to like this point of land so well that a num-
ber of them settled there permanently. They had reported that alligators were as
numerous and as easy to obtain as hogs (suki in Hitchiti), so that the parent tribe
called their settlement Hog-eaters, which is what Nikasuki means.

We can not, however, concede the likelihood that n could so easily
have been corrupted into m, since the latter appears in the early
documents as far back as we can go. I have elsewhere quoted the
opinion of the old Mikasuki chief relative to the distinction between
his people and the Hitchiti, and their supposed relationship to the
Chiaha. It must be remembered that the Chiaha anciently came
away from the Yamasee, at a point not far from the earlier home
of the Oconee, and it is quite possible that they recognized
a closer connection with the Oconee Indians than with the
Hitchiti proper. True, Mr. Penieres, subagent for Indian affairs
in Florida, reported in 1821 that only a few straggling families
of Chiaha were to be found in the peninsula;’ but it is quite
possible that these represented a much later immigration, the earlier
colonists having already (by 1778) adopted the name Mikasuki. The
first settlement of these ‘‘ true Mikasuki,’”’ as I venture to call them,
was, so far as we know, at Old Mikasuki, near the lake which bears
their name, in Jefferson County, Florida. Later they, or part of them,
moved to New Mikasuki, somewhere near Greenville, in Madison
County. In 1823 the chief of this town was Tuskameha (Taski
heniha).? It appears from Cohen, however, that at a somewhat ear-
lier date the chief of the Mikasuki was named Tokos imala; called by
‘the whites John Hicks, or Hext. Tokos imala appears in a list of
towns dated 1821 as chief of the town in the Alachua plains,’ and
he did not die until 1835; therefore when no town is enumerated
in the Alachua plains in 1823 and no chief bearing the name,‘ we
are left to guess whether the town has been omitted or whether
someone else appears in his place. It is probable that the Mikasuki

1 See p. 12. 4Cohen, Notices of Florida, p. 641.
2 See p. 404. 5 See p. 406.
3 See p. 411. 6 List on pp. 411-412.

148061 °—22 26

402 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

were scattered among several towns, but as these, with but few
exceptions, received new names from each new location, it is prac-
tically impossible to trace them.

From notes gathered by myself and the statements of early writers
it is evident that this Mikasuki element was one of the most impor-
tant, if not the most important, among the Seminole. It is also
evident that there was before the outbreak of the final Seminole
war a certain amount of friction and mutual jealousy between them
and the Muskogee Seminole, founded partly, no doubt, on differences
in speech and customs. Thus, in a letter written by William P.
Duval to Col. Thomas L. McKenney, general superintendent of
Indian affairs, and dated Tallahassee, April 5, 1826, we find the
following disparaging notice: |

The Mickasuky tribe I must except from this general [commendatory] remark.
They are, and ever have been, the most violent and lawless Indians in all the South.
They have set their own chiefs at defiance, killing their hogs and cattle, and pillaging
their plantations. There are about two hundred of these Indians that never can be
managed but by force. Three times have they attempted to put to death their head
chief, because he has endeavored to restrain their excesses.

All the chiefs, in open council, have denounced them; and have assured me that,
if the Government will afford them assistance, they will punish these outlaws of
their nation and bring them into their boundary. I have seen many of them on
the Suwanee and Ocilla Rivers; they are actually raising crops in the neighborhood
of the whites, although I furnished them with provisions two months since, when they
all promised immediately to go into the boundary. Not one has gone, nor will they
move unless compelled. I have been upwards of two months in the woods, regulating
and bringing the Indians to order; and have completely succeeded, except with the
Mickasuky tribe. The inhabitants are greatly exasperated at the injuries they have
sustained from this tribe, and the worst consequences may be expected. I acknowl-
edge I can do nothing more without force. No confidence can be placed in this tribe,
and the orderly Indians complain as much of them as the whites. They have most
wantonly killed up the cattle and hogs of the nation, and will continue to do so. In
fact, their own people have suffered as much from their depredations as our citizens.!

On the other hand, John Hicks, chief of at least a part of the
Mikasuki, is represented by Cohen as the most influential and far-
sighted man among the Seminole and a supporter of the emigration
idea.?, His death was followed almost immediately by the ascendency
of the party opposed to emigration and the outbreak of the Seminole -
war. Cohen is also authority for the statement that the Ocklawaha
tribe or band represented the last element of Yamasee Indians, and
he is probably correct, since the Yamasee are placed near Ocklawaha
River on several maps of a slightly earlier period. He adds that
they were noticeably darker than the other Seminole.* On the list
of towns given in 1823 appears one called ‘‘ Yumersee,”’ located “at the

1 Am. State Papers, Indian Affairs, 0, p. 694.
2 Cohen, Notices of Florida, p. 64 et seq.
3Tbid., p. 33,

—

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 408

head of Sumulga Hatchee River, 20 miles north of St. Marks.” The
chief at that time was ‘‘ Alac Hajo”’ (Ahalak hadjo, “‘ potato hadjo’’).!
I have given their history elsewhere.’

According to an aged Oklahoma Seminole who was born in
Florida, the people of Tallahassee, where the State capital now
stands, were Sawokli. It appears from the early records that this
was an old Florida settlement, but I have no other evidence regarding
its origin. The Cull-oo-sau hat-che (Kalusa hatchi) town of Hawkins
I believe to have been occupied by some of the earliernatives of Florida,
which, as has been seen, had remained down into American times.*

The history of the earliest Muskogee element in Florida is rescued
for us in part by Romans, who says:

About the middle of the land, nearly in latitude 28, is a village called New Eufala,
being a colony from Yufala, in the Upper Creek Nation, planted in 1767, in a beautiful
and fertile plain.*

Although a little too far south, as given by him, there is reason to
believe that this is the town later known as Tco’ko tca’ti, or ‘Red
House,’ and sometimes as ‘‘Red Town,” between the Big hammock
and the hammock called from the name of this town ‘‘Chucoochartie
hammock.”

There is no way of determining whence the populations of ‘‘ We-cho-
took-me”’ and “ Tallau-gue chapco pop-cau,”’ the two remaining towns
in Hawkins’s list, were drawn, nor those of most of the towns men-
tioned by Bartram. We-cho-took-me was remembered by Jackson
Lewis, the informant to whom I have so often referred. He pro-
nounced the name Oetcotukni and interpreted it to mean ‘‘ where
there is a pond of water.”’

A few years after the date set by Romans, namely in 1778, a new
Muskogee element appears in this region contributed by the towns
of Kolomi, Fus-hatchee and Okchai, besides an Alabama contingent
from Tawasa and Kan-tcati.°

After the conclusion of the Creek war of 1813-14 great numbers of
Creeks, especially from the Upper Creek country, in a few cases entire
towns, descended into Florida, increasing the original population by
about two-thirds. And, whereas we have seen that up to this time
the Hitchiti element was predominant, it now begins to be swallowed
up or overshadowed by that of the true Creeks or Muskogee. The
distinction between the older or true Seminole and the later comers
was maintained for a time, as appears in the reports and documents
of the early years of the nineteenth century relating to Indian affairs
in Florida. One of the most important statements in this connection

1 See p. 411. 4 Romans, Concise Nat. Hist. Fla., p. 280,

2 See p. 108. 6 MS., Lib. Cong,
3 See p. 344,

404 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

is by Mr. Penieres in a letter to General Jackson, dated July, 1821,
though the estimates of population given by him are probably
too high. This has been printed several times, but I here take it
from Jedidiah Morse’s Report on the Indian Tribes, where it seems to
appear with the smallest number of typographical blemishes:

The Indian tribes known under the.denomination of the Creeks, are divided into
bands, designated to me as follows: The Mekasousky, Souhane, Moskoky, Santa-Fé,
Red-stick and Echitos. I have been assured that those bands had raised, during the
late war, more than twelve hundred warriors, which may lead to suppose a population
of more than three thousand individuals.

The nation known under the denomination of Seminoles, is composed of seven
bands—viz, the Larchivue, Oklévuaha, Chockechiatte, Pyaklé-kaha, Taléhouyana
and Topkélaké. Besides these are some remnants of ancient tribes, as the Houtchis,
Chaas, Cana-acke, etc.; but of these there are only a few straggling families.

On the borders of Georgia is another tribe, called Cahouita. This tribe, under the
orders of Mc’ Intosh, raised from one hundred to one hundred ana fifty warriors; who
under this chief, about seven years ago, waged a civil war on the whites and Seminoles
who hold them in the utmost detestation.

To this census, which would carry the Indian population to more than five thousand
individuals, of both sexes, must be added five or six hundred maroon negroes, or
mulattos, who live wild in the woods, or in a state of half slavery among the Indians.!

Mr. Penieres evidently distinguishes as ‘‘Creeks’’ the later comers
into Florida, and as “Seminoles” the earlier occupants of the peninsula.
Under the first heading he is not describing the Creek Nation in
general, but only those who had settled in Florida within the seven
years preceding the date of his letter. Although there at first appears
to be great lack of system in this enumeration, a careful examination
shows that it has a real significance and helps us to understand the
Indian population of Florida, the elements which entered into it,
and to some extent the distribution of those elements. Let us take
the Seminole proper first. The name first given, ‘‘Latchivue,” is
without doubt meant for Alachua, but it is not intended to designate
the Oconee who lived on the Alachua plains in Bartram’s time, but
evidently that portion of the Mikasuki under John Hicks or Takos
imala known on independent evidence to have been there in 1821.
“Oklevuaha”’ is, of course, Ocklawaha, and represents probably, as I
have said above, the old Yamasee element. ‘‘Chockechiatte’’ is
Tcoko teati, the Eufaula colony.2,_ Pyaklé-kaha is evidently identical
with Pelaclekaha, which is given by some authorities as the residence
of Mikonopi and by others as a Negro town near Okihamgi, his actual
residence. At any rate it clearly refers to the Oconee colony in
Florida, the pioneer town and the one visited by Bartram when situ-
ated on the Alachua plains. The town next mentioned, Taléhouyana,
is misprinted in most of the other places where this letter has been
copied. While its identity is not entirely assured there is good

1 Morse, Rept. to the Sec. of War, p. 311. 2 See p. 403,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 405

reason to believe that it is none other than the town of Hotalgihuyana,
settled by Chiaha and Osochi Indians. The place last mentioned is
‘““Topkélaké,”’ which means ‘fort place,” ‘place where there is a
fort.’”’ There were several localities known by the name. One
appears in 1821 near the present city of Tallahassee, and there was
probably another near Tohopekaliga Lake in central Florida, but I
am inclined to identify this settlement with a town which occurs in
the enumeration made in 1823 and which is placed 30 miles ‘“‘ east,” by
which I suppose we are to understand north, of Cape Florida.’ It
would thus seem to have been in the neighborhood of Hillsboro
Inlet. The settlers were probably from the Upper Creeks.? While
it is said that the Seminole were composed of seven bands, only six
are enumerated. Perhaps Mr. Penieres classed as a seventh the ‘‘rem-
nants of ancient tribes” to which he refers immediately afterwards.
Of these the ‘‘Houtchis”’ are of course the Yuchi, and we know from
several sources that their settlement was one called ‘‘ Tallahassee or
Spring Garden,”’ in the enumeration of 1823, near a place in Volusia
County called Spring Garden to-day.' The ‘‘Chaas’”’ were probably
the Chiaha, a settlement of whom, according to Bell, was at a place
called Beech Creek, the exact location of which I have been unable
to determine.’ According to my Seminole informants there was a
great fighter in Florida named Kana’ki, and they thought the name
“Cana-acke”’ might have been derived from him, but I believe it is
intended for the Kan-hatki.‘

Turning to those bands set down as belonging to the Creeks we find
some that are undoubtedly Muskogee and some of different lineage.
The Mikasuki are also referred to under this head, and the name was
probably used for those at New Mikasuki, who may have come from
the Lower Creek towns much later than the ones already considered.
The ‘‘Echitos”’ are, of course, Hitchiti, in this case people from the
true Hitchiti town. The rest appear to have been mainly Muskogee,
although there were some Alabama and Koasati among them. The
“‘Souhane”’ were those Indians settled on Suwanee River, who, accord-
ing to a letter written by Gen. Jackson in 1821, were from the
Upper Creeks.’ The Santa Fe band must have been the Indians on
Santa Fe River. Jackson gives a Santa Fe talofa “at the east fork
of the Suwanee,” but does not state whether its people came from
the Upper Creeks or were old inhabitants of Florida. The “ Red-
Stick”? band may have been so named merely because they belonged
to the element among the Creeks recently at war with the whites, or
they may have been that portion from the Red towns. In any case

1 See p. 412. 4 See p. 269.

2 See p. 407, town No, 22. 6 See p. 406, town No. 11.
3 See p. 407. 6 See p. 406, town No. 9.

406 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY {BuL. 738

we can not separate them from the band set down as ‘‘Moskoky’ —
the Muskogee. In Jackson’s letter 11 towns beside two on the
Suwanee are definitely identified as having come from the Creeks,
and nearly all of these were from the Upper Creeks.!. The remaining
seven are either given’as containing strictly Florida people or else are
passed over without comment, and among them are one or two which
there is reason to believe belong among the later comers. The relation
of two to one, which I have already mentioned as representing prob-
ably the proportion of refugee Creeks to old Seminole, is therefore
maintained roughly, even in the number of their towns. The
“Spanish Indians,” consisting of remnants of the ancient Florida
peoples, are not included in this enumeration.

The Seminole towns moved about so frequently and their names
were altered so often that it is impossible to give a complete history
of the people by towns, or to identify in every case the tribes which
occupied them. Two or three town lists have been preserved from
the period just before the outbreak of the Seminole war and it may
be of some interest to insert these. They vividly illustrate the truth
of the statement I have just made. The first is contained in a letter
of Capt. John H. Bell, agent for the Indians in Florida, addressed to
a committee of Congress, in February, 1821, and reproduced by
Jedidiah Morse in his Report on Indian Affairs.?_ It is as follows:

1.. Red-town, at Tampa Bay. Number of souls unknown.

2. Oc-lack-o-na-yahe, above Tampa Bay. A number of souls.

3. O-po-nays Town, back of Tampa Bay.

4. Tots-ta-la-hoeets-ka, or Watermelon Town, on the seaboard, west side Tampa Bay;
the greater part of all these fled from the Upper Creeks when peace was given to that
nation.

5. A-ha-pop-ka, situated back of the Musquitoe.

6. Low-walta Village, composed of those who fled from Coosa, and followed McQueen
and Francis, their prophets.

7. McQueen’s Village, east side Tampa Bay.

8. A-lack-a-way-talofa, in the Alachua Plains. A great number of souls. Took-o-
sa-moth-lay, the chief.

9. Santa-fee-talofa, at the east fork of Suwany. Lock-taw-me-coocky, the chief.

10. Waw-ka-sau-su, on the east side of the mouth of the Suwany, on the seaboard;
these are from the Coosa River, followers of McQueen and Francis.

11. Old Suwany Town, burnt in 1818, on the Suwany River. These are from the
Tallapoosa towns, and they are from the Upper Creeks.

12. A-la-pa-ha-talofa, west of Suwany and east of the Miccasuky. The chief Ock-
mulgee is lately dead.

13. Wa-cissa-talofa, at the head of St. Mark’s River. These are from the Chatta-
houchy, Upper Creeks.

14. Willa-noucha-talofa, near the head of St. Mark’s River, west of Wa-cissa-talofa.
Natives of Florida.

1 See below. 2 Morse, Rept. to the Sec. of War, pp. 306-308.

‘

‘ie PP i tt ee Sc

Ones

eee at

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 407

15. Talla-hasse, on the waters of the Miccasuky pond. These have lived there a.
long time, have about 100 warriors, and suppose 10 souls to a warrior; say 1,000 souls.

16. Top-ke-gal-ga, on the east side on the O-clock-ney, near Talla-hasse.

17. We-thoe-cuchy-talofa [Withla-cooche talofa], between the St. Mark’s and
O-clock-ney Rivers, in the fork of the latter; very few of them are natives of the land.

18. O-chuce-ulga, east of the Apalachicola, where Hambly and Blunt [Blount] live;
about 250 souls. Coth-rin, the chief.

19. Cho-co-nickla Village, the chief is Nea-thoe-o-mot-la, the second chief, Mulatto-
King; were raised here; have about sixty warriors on the west side of the Apalachicola.

20. Top-hulga.'| This village and Cho-co-nick-la join each other. Raised in East
Florida, and removed there.

21. Tock-to-eth-la, west of Fort Scott and Chatta-houchy, ten miles above the forks;
forty or fifty warriors were raised at the O-cun-cha-ta, or Red Ground, and moved
down.

22. Another town in East Florida Point, called O-chu-po-cras-sa. These moved
down from the Upper Creeks. About thirty warriors, and a great many women and
children settled there.

The foregoing list is extracted from a talk held by General Jackson with three Chiefs of
the Florida Indians, viz, Blount, Nea-moth-la, and Mulatto King, at Pensacola, 19th
September, 1821. To which may be added the following settlements in East Florida:

23. Pe-lac-le-ke-ha, the residence of Miccanopa, chief of the Seminole nations,
situated about one hundred and twenty miles south of Alachua.

24. Chu-ku-chatta, about twenty miles south of Pilaclekaha.

25. Hich-a-pue-susse, about twenty miles southeast of Chukuchatta, at the same
distance from the head of Tampa.

26. Big Hammock settlement, the most numerous, north of Tampa Bay and west of
Hechapususse.

27. Oc-la-wa-haw, on the river of that name, west of St. John’s River.

28. Mulatto Girl’s Town, south of Caskawilla Lake.

29. Bucker Woman’s Town, near Long Swamp, east of Big Hammock.

30. King Heijah’s, south, and Payne’s negro settlements in Alachua; these are
slaves belonging to the Seminoles, in all about three hundred.

31. John Hicks’ Town, west of Payne’s Savannah, Miccasukys.

32. Oke-a-fenoke swamp, south side, a number of Cowetas.

33. Beech Creek, settlement of Cheehaws.?

34. Spring Garden, above Lake George, Uchees. Billy is their chief.

35. South of Tampa, near Charlotte’s Bay, Choctaws.

It is probable that the supplementary list repeats under a dif-
ferent name some of those in the list quoted from Jackson. Thus
Bell’s “John Hicks’ Town,” No. 31, is evidently identical with Jack-
son’s ‘‘ A-lack-a-way-talofa,’’ No. 8, John Hicks’s Indian name hay-
ing been Takos imala. Jackson’s “Red Town,’ No. 1, may also be
the same as Bell’s ‘‘Chu-ku-chatta,’”’ No. 24, the latter meaning ‘‘red
house;’’ but in that case we must suppose that Jackson has erred in
classing the town with those “the greater part’? of which fled from

1 Also called Attapulgas; the Creek is Atap’halgi from the atap’ha, dogwood. (See Gatschet in Mise.
Coll. Ala. Hist. Soc., 1, p. 393.)

2 Possibly this is identical with Fulemmy’s Town or Pinder Town, which is placed on Suwanee River in
1817 and was inhabited by ChiahaIndians. ‘‘ Pinder”’ is dialectic for peanut. (See Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist.
Soc., 1, p. 396.)

408 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

the Upper Creeks. Analyzing the composition of these towns as far
as the information at hand will allow we find the following condition:
Nos. 8 and 31, as just noted, represent one town, occupied by the
Mikasuki, but probably by only a part of them; No. 23 represents
the old Oconee; No. 24, the Eufaula Indians; No. 27, the Yamasee;
No. 32, Coweta Indians; No. 33, Chiaha; No. 34, Yuchi; and Nos. 28
to 30 were probably settled almost entirely by negroes. I have al-
ready given my reasons for thinking that the ‘‘Choctaws”’ settled
according to Bell in No. 35 were really Calusa Indians.’ No. 21 is
said to have been drawn from the Red Ground among the Upper
Creeks. There were two towns of this name—one an Abihka, the
other an Alabama town. I believe that the one here referred to was
the Alabama town because the Abihka were little involved in the
war, and it appears, moreover, that comparatively few of the In-
dians engaged in the fight at Horseshoe Bend emigrated to Florida.
On the other hand, the Alabama were active hostiles, and Paddy
Walsh, one of the ablest Creek leaders, was an Alabama of Tawasa
town. The Indians of town No. 7 were probably Tulsa, because
Peter McQueen, their leader, was a Tulsa Indian. The name of No.
6 is probably an attempt at Liwahali. There is to-day in the Semi-
nole Nation a town of this name. It is said to have consisted partly
of Hotiwahali Indians, as the name implies, but also of people from
Kan-hatki and Fus-hatchee.?, Probably No. 6 is this compound town
or the nucleus out of which it developed.

Nos. 1 to 4 are said by Jackson to have come for the most part
from the Upper Creeks; and No. 22, apparently the settlement at
Cape Florida, is assigned a similar origin. No. 13 is said to have
come from the Chattahoochee and at the same time from the Upper
Creek settlements. Perhaps the inhabitants were from those settle-
ments above the falls of the Chattahoochee which were established in
early times by the Okfuskee. No. 10 is given asfrom the Coosa, and
No. 11 from the Tallapoosa, while No. 17 is merely said to have
consisted of immigrants. Nos. 25 and 26 were probably from the
Upper Creeks. Nos. 14, 19, and 20 are said to have been occupied
by old Florida Indians, while Nos. 4, 9, 12, 16, and 18 were also
probably populated from the older occupants of the peninsula.
Tallahassee, No. 15, is said by some living informants to have been
a Sawokli settlement. To summarize, 16 towns appear to have
belonged to the old Seminoles, 15 to the immigrants from the Upper
Creeks, and 3 to the Negroes settled among them. The towns of
the newcomers were apparently more populous, since they seem to
have outnumbered the earlier occupants.

1 See p. 28, 2 See p. 269,

7 sie

ee eee

ae eee ae =e

—————

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 409

In his estimates of population Morse gives a somewhat different
list furnished by a Capt. Young, and dating from a slightly earlier
period: !

Tribe. Population. Location.

1. Micasukeys [Mikasuki] 1,400 | 30m. NNE. from Fort St. Mark, on a pond 14
miles long, 2 or 3 wide; land fertile, and of a
beautiful aspect.

2. Fowl Towns [or Tota- 300 | 12 miles E. Fort Scott; land tolerable.
losi talofa].?
3. Oka-tiokinans [Okiti- 580 | Near Fort Gaines.
yakani].
4. Uchees [Yuchi]...... 130 | Near the Mikasukey.
5. Ehawho-ka-les [Saw- 150 | On Apalachicola, 12 miles below Ocheese
okli uff,
6. eta ‘ 220 | At the bluff of their name.
7. Tamatles (Tamalil. . 220 | 7 miles above the Ocheeses.
8. Attapulgas [or Atap’- - 220 | On Little River, a branch of Okalokina, 15
hulga].* miles above the Mikasukey path, from Fort
Gadsden; fine body of lands.
9. Telmocresses [Tal 100 | W. side of ‘Chattahoochee, 15 miles above the
mutcasi|.* fork; good land.
10. Cheskitalowas [Chis- 580 | On the W. side of Chattahoochee, 2 miles
ka talofa].® above the line.
EE SWGRIVOA 5 scans. -,~ 250 | 4 miles above the Cheskitalowas.
12. Emusas [Yamasee] ©. . 20 | 2 miles above the Wekivas.
13. Ufallahs [Eufaula]. . - . 670 | 12 miles above Fort Gaines.
14. Red grounds ee 100 | 2 miles above the line.
bama Indians’}. °
15. Eto-husse-wak kes 100 3 miles above Fort Gaines.
[Itahasi waki].
16. Tatto-whe-hallys 130 | Scattered among other towns; dishonest.
{Chatukchufaula?].?
ive enn 8 [Talla- 15 | On the road from Okalokina to Micasukey.
assee
18. Owassissas ®.......... 100 | On the eastern waters of St. Mark’s River.
19. Chehaws [Chiaha]... 670 wane Flint River, in the fork of Makulley
eek.
20. Talle-whe-anas_ [Ho- 210 | E. side of Flint River, not far from Chehaws.
talgihuyana].
21. cies [Okmul- 220 | E. of Flint River, near the Tallewheanas.
gee].
SUOtBlos.. elms Se sss 6, 385

This appears to include merely the uppermost Seminole towns
along with some which properly belong to the Lower Creeks. Most
of them are easily identified, as has been indicated in the brackets.

1 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 364.

2 A writer quoted by Gatschet gives these as Cahalli hatchi, old Tallahassi, Atap’halgi, Allik hadshi,
Etatulga, Mikasuki, (Misc. Colls. Ala. Hist. Soc.,1, p. 413). Thesecond, third, and last of these occur inde-
pendently in the above list. Also see p. 177.

3 See No. 20 in Bell’s list.

4 A Tal muteasiin this neighborhood is recorded by no one else unlessit isintended by the “‘Sumachaches”’
of Manuel Garcia’s diary, dated 1800 (Edward E. Ayer Coll.in Newberry Library, Chicago). Thesame
officer mentions Tallahassey and Bruacissey (Owassissas), besides several towns properly belonging to the
Lower Creeks.

See p. 308. 8 See p. 403.

8 See p. 108. 9 See p. 406.

7 See p. 245.

410 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

This group of quasi-Seminole towns, along with the Lower Creeks,
ceded a tract of land to Panton, Leslie & Co. in 1785 in order to ex-
tinguish debts contracted with that trading house, and confirmed it in
1806. The following chiefs affixed their signatures to the confirma-
tion of this treaty. I have preserved the manuscript orthography.

Hopay Hacho Totolozu Talofa [Totalosi Talofa], great orator of the Seminole.
Hothepocio Justannagee of Totolose Talofa [Totalosi Talofa]
Hopay micco of Ocknuilgeeche [Okmulgee or Okmulgutci].
Tustannagee micco of the same town.

Kuneeka Thlucco of Cheeyaha [Chiaha].

Emathlee Thlucio of the same.

Mico Napamico of Cuasita [Kasihta].

Yahullo Emathla of Chiska Talofa.

Tasikaya mico of Osootchie [Osotci].

Uchee Tustannagee of Uchee [Yuchi].

Yahulla micco of Ufalles [Eufaula].

Albania Justannagee of Ufallee [Eufaula].

Tasikaya Hadjo of Ocheesces [Ochisi].

Nika mico of Achinalga [Achinaalga].

Tustannage Hadjo of Tochtouheithles.!

Ninnyyuageichy of Tochtouheithles.?

Tustannage of Palachucklie [Apalachicola].

Yahulla Ennakla or John Meally of Ocheesa [Otcisi].
Hopay Hadjo, for Copixtsy mico, of Mickacuky [Mikasuki],
Justannagee Hopay or Little Prince of Cowetas [Coweta].
Ocheesce mico of Yauollee [Iolee].?

Hopayok Hadjo of Yanollee [Iolee].

Mico Tecocksy or Hatas mico.

Hopayoo mico of Tauassees [Tawasa].

Totka Tustannage of Wifalutka.*

Efau Tustannagee of Mikasuky [Mikasuki] for Hopay Hadjo.
Pawas mico of Ocoteyokony [Okitiyagani].

Tustannage Chapo of Ennussee [Emussee or Yamasee].
Tasikaya mico of the same.

Tustannage Chupko of Tomathly [Tamali].

Halleveccha, king of Tomathla [Tamali].

Tuskinia, lieutenant of Chatoackchufall [Chatukchufaula].*

The Chatukchufaula Indians were probably on the Chattahoochee
at this time above the Coweta, and were therefore included. A
similar grant of land was made to Forbes & Co. in 1811.5

The third list of Seminole towns was made only two years after
Bell’s.° Where possible, in the subjoined reproduction of it, I have
indicated by numbers in brackets the town in list 1 to which each
corresponds, but the number of cases in which it has been found

1 The town numbered 21 in list 1 and 5 in list 3, and are probably of Alabama origin.

2 Seven of list 3.

3 Perhaps identical with No. 13 in the third list.

4 Copy of MS., Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib.

5In the Ayer collection is a statement of the debts contracted by the Indians with this firm, the
amount of each debt, and the name of the debtor, but the names are mostly English nicknames.

5 American State Papers, Indian Affairs, I, p. 439.

Oh a se

SWANTON]

EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS

411

impossible to do this, together with the numerous changes in the
names of the chiefs and in the town locations, show the difficulties
encountered in tracing the history of Seminole bands.

Town.

1. Cohowofooche. . - - . ide
2 [15]. Tallahassa [Tala-
3 [23]. Okehuspe [Oki-
4 [20]. ‘Tape [Atap’-

5 [21]. Totoawathla.......

6[19}. Chokonokla
[‘‘Burnt house’’?]

f°) 11 Re ee

8 [18]. Spanawalka [‘‘ Plen-
ty of Spaniards
there”’?].

eeeOS Reo... --

10. Ohathlokhouchy [0i-
takutci].

LSY MIMCTECC soe: = 5.212 fs
12. Lochchiocha. .......-
13 [147]. Alouko..........

14. Hiamonee.........-.--
15. Tuckagulga. ......-.--
Ie WASUDA. <<. 3. 42/53

17. Hatchcalamocha.... -

18. Etotulga ___[‘‘ Fallen
tree’’].

19. Topananaulka [Tu-
benanalga, ‘‘Place

of zigzag timber’’ |.

20. Seleuxa [Ironwood ?}. .

mi Bhesulgea ss 2355.0...

22. Mickasuky (New). .- .
23. Sampala (Sambala]. .. :

24. Oktahatku [Oktaha
hatki

25 [12]. Chohalaboohhul-
ka [Tcu lihaboa/lga,
‘“Place where deer
tracks abound”’}.

Chief.

Situation.

Neamothla

[Heniha
imata

|.
Chefixico [Tcu fiksiko]. -|

Miconope [Miko naba].. -

Ehe-mathlochee [Ima-
tutci?].

Eheconhatamico [Ikan-
hatki miko].

Mutlatto King..< .....:..

Blount ess et

Latafixico [Hola‘ta fiks-

iko}.

Woxaholahta [Woksi
hola‘ta].

Alac Hajo[Ahalak hadjo]

Okoska-amathla [Okos-
ki imata].
Tukchuslu Hajo.......

Chowastic [Tcowastayi] .
Ben Burgess. ........--

Toshatehismico [Koa-
sati miko].

Amathla Hajo [Imala
hadjo}.

iielecooche [Mikotci]. -

Obiakeets 324.80 5.055

Koamathia [Koe imala?].

Hockoknakola.........

MIB KAM CNAs ese erie ey
Ehe-maltho-chee [Ima-
lotci].

Menohomaltha Hajo
{Heniha imata hadjo].
YVaHOIG AIO. 25.08 Joo:

| 23 miles N. by W.

from St.
Mark’s.

20 miles N.
Mark’s.

60 miles SW. from Volusia.

by W. from St.

30 miles E. of Appalachicola,
and 1 mile N. of Forbes’s
purchase.

W. side of Chattahoochee, 10
miles above the forks.

W. side of Appalachicola, 4 m.
below the fork.

60 m. above the mouth of Appa-
lachicola, on the W. bank.

2 m. below Iolee, on the same
side.

At the mouth of Oscillee River,
on the E. bank.

On Little River, 40 m.
Appalachicola.

Head of Sumulga MHatchee
River, 20 m. N. of St. Mark’s.

60 m. E. of Appalachicola, and
near Ochlochne.

E. side of Sumulga Hatchee
River, 20 m. N. of St. Mark’s.

5 m. from the Georgia line, on
the E. bank of Ochlochne
River.

On the E. bank of Ochlochne
River, between that and
Hiamonee.

2m. E. of Sumulga Hatchee
River and 18 m. from St.
Mark’s.

Near Drum Swamp, 18 m. W.
of New Mickasuky town.

E. of

A 10m: mi of the old Mickasuky

tow
3 im. “WW. of New Mickasuky.

Head of Oscillee River.

5 m. S. of New Mickasuky
town.

30 m. W. of Suwanee River.

26 m. above the forks of the
Appalachicola, on the W.
bank.

7m. E. of W. [!] from Sampala.

W. side of Suwanee, above its
junction with Alapaha.

1 Mentioned under the name of its chief, ‘‘Ematlochee,” in U. S. Ind. Treaties (1833), p. 578, 1837, as a

Creek town.

412 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 73

Town. Chief. Situation.

2D.eW CHM. !s:c..ct cls eiow es erin: [Hola‘ta | 4 m. E. of Tallahassee towns.
imata].

27 [9]. Wachitokha...... Ho-lahta-mico [Hola‘- | E. side of Suwanee, between
ta miko]. that and Santa Fe.

28. Talakhacha [Tala | Tullis Hajo [Hilis hadjo] | W. side of Cape Florida, on the

hatci?]. seacoast.
29 [22]. Sohopikaliga [To- | Cho-ke-hip-kalana. ...-. E. of the last town, 30 m.

hopki lagi, ‘‘ Where
sits a fort’’].
30. Loksachumpa.......-- Lok-po-ka, Sakoosa | Head of St. John’s River.
Hajo [Takusa Hadjo].
31. Ahapapka [‘‘Place to | Ocheesetustanuka[Otci’-| Head of Okelawaha.

eat potatoes’’ ]. si tastanagi].

32. Apukasasoche........ Enehe-mathlochee (Hen-| 20 m. W. from the head of St.

iha imalutci]. John’s.

33. Yulaka [Wialaka, | Philip, or Emathla...... On the W. side of St. John’s
spring, or Yulaha, River, 35 m. from Volusia or
orange?]. Dexter.

34 [34]. Talahassee, or | Uchee Tustehuka, or | 10 m. from Volusia.

Spring Gardens. Billy [Yutci tastanagi].

Bie! Deh (pao Sea eee ae sags Checota'Hajo:..5- = .--<- wie ne John’s, E. of Black

reek.

36. Tuslalahockaka....... Alac Hajo [Ahalak hadjo]} 10m. W. of Walalecooche.

37 [27]. Yalacasooche.....| Yelathaloke........-.-.- Mouth of Oklawaha.

Jackson Lewis gave me the name of one later Seminole town,
Lania’tci aba’la (‘‘ Across a little mountain”), which I have not been
able to identify in the above lists.

With the Seminole war we have little to do. As an example of
the possibilities of Indian warfare when opposed to European it has
no parallel, having dragged through eight years, not including Jack-
son’s first raid inte northern Florida, and having cost the United
States Government, it is estimated, $20,000,000, the lives of many
thousand persons of both sexes, and enormous property losses
besides. Mikonopi, who, as I have shown, represented the old Oconee
element, was the theoretical head chief of the Indians during this
contest, but the brains of native resistance were Osceola, an Indian
from Tulsa, and Jumper, who is said to have come from the Upper
Towns, but to have been the last survivor of ‘‘some ancient tribe.”
In spite of the prominence of these two Creeks, the Mikasuki and
the other older elements as a whole took the most conspicuous parts
in it. Although they were outnumbered, and in time nearly over-
whelmed, by the later Creek refugees, to whom the popular but
erroneous rendering of the term ‘‘Seminole,” that of “‘runaways,”’
would more particularly apply, the fact must be emphasized that
the primacy in this war belonged to a non-Muskogee people who
had in no way been concerned in the great Creek uprising, and that
it was therefore at base a war with an entirely separate tribe.

We learn from the report of an Indian agent, writing in 1846,
that the year before, shortly after the removal of the Seminole to

1 Ind. Affs. Rept. for 1846, p. 275.

€
=

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 413

the strip of Oklahoma later occupied by them, there were 27 ‘‘towns”’
or bands there which were in 1846 reduced to 25 by the death of two
leaders, and the incorporation of their bands with others. The
associations of the Creek elements in particular, in Florida, were so
little sanctified by time and custom that they were easily destroyed,
and progressively, with gradual losses in numbers, these 25 were
still further cut down, until within the memory of the older people,
only eight towns or neighborhoods supporting square grounds re-
mained, and in 1912 these had been still further reduced to six.
The Mikasuki preserve a ground near Seminole, Okla., and the
Hitchiti had one near Keokuk Falls, which was given up many years
ago. Of the remainder, one, located near Sasakwa, is called Liwa-
hali, and, as I have stated above, contains, besides persons from the
Upper Creek town of that name, the descendants of those who once
occupied Kan-hatki and Fus-hatchee. Eufaula may be assumed to
represent the descendants of that old Seminole colony planted at
Teuko teati. According to the people now constituting it, the only
Indians other than Eufaula living there are Chiaha. The other
square grounds are called Okfuskee, Chiaha, Talahasutci, and Otcisi.
Okfuskee and Chiaha bear names of former Creek towns, but I learn
that the appellations are quite conventional, although no doubt some
of the individuals going by the name are actually descended
from people belonging to the town which the name _ indi-
cates. Talahasutci is probably the ‘‘Talahasochte”’ of Bartram.
There are now no old people belonging to it, but the chief told me
he thought it had broken away from Tulsa. On the other hand,
some Creek informants insisted that it came either from Abihka or
from Abihka through Pakan talahasi. As I have pointed out else-
where, Pakan talahasi did not come from Abihka, and it is not likely
that this town did either. If Hawkins is right in his description of
the make-up of the Seminole population it would seem that
originally it must have been either a Mikasuki town or a branch of
Lower Eufaula.‘ Conclusive evidence is lacking. In Bartram’s
time the chief was known as the White King (Miko hatki).? Otcisi
is a name not found among the regular town names of the Creeks
proper. One of my oldest informants said that his mother explained
it as derived from the custom of going out after hickory nuts (otci)
with which to make oil. He thought the town was a branch of
Eufaula hopai, but that into it had been gathered people from other
places. Otcisi was, however, a name given by Hitchiti-speaking
people to the Creeks, and in fact to any who used a language different
from their own. Another informant, himself an Otcisi, said that

1 See p. 400. 2 Bartram, Travels, p. 224 et seq.

414 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

most of the inhabitants came from Hickory Ground, though a few
were from Talwalako. This is, perhaps, the most probable statement,
since this man, Yonasi, was the oldest person belonging to that place.
The name, as applied to a town, appears as early as 1800 in the diary
of Manuel Garcia, a Spanish officer sent to receive the Apalachee
fort from Bowles.

But, as I have already said, the lack of permanence of most Semi-
nole towns, and the frequent change of name which they underwent,
has rendered it next to impossible to follow in any connected manner
the history of more than a very few groups. At the same time the
main outlines of Seminole history and the principal factors entering
into it are quite evident. They were at base a portion of the Atsik-
hata or non-Muskogee people of southern Georgia, around whom had
gathered a still more numerous body of refugee Muskogee. These
latter obscured their original character to such an extent that
its basal separateness was usually unrecognized, and ultimately
the language of the invaders overwhelmed that of the original
settlers. This fact lends coherence to several early statements
like that of Swan that ‘the Seminoles are the original stock of the
Creek, but their language has undergone so great a change that it
is hardly understood by the Upper Creeks, or even by themselves
in general. It is preserved by many old people, and taught by
women to the children as a kind of religious duty; but as they grow
to manhood, they forget and lose it by the more frequent use of the
modern tongue.” * Of course, Swan misunderstood the situation.
The original Creek language of which he speaks was Mikasuki, which
in his time was already being crowded out by Muskogee or Creek
proper.

THE CHICKASAW

The Chickasaw have had a simple, readily traceable history since
the time when they first appear in our documents, and although
from the point of view of the historian proper they might be made
the subject of a long memoir, a short sketch will satisfy my present
purpose. Our first notice of them is in the De Soto narratives and
there we learn that they then possessed those great warlike qualities
for which they were afterwards noted. De Soto passed the winter
of 1540-41, from about Christmas to March 4, in what appears to
have been the principal Chickasaw town.? On the evening of March
3 the Spanish commander made a demand on the Chickasaw chief

' Archivo Nacional, Sevilla, copy in Edward E. Ayer Coll., Newberry Library.

2 Swan in Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 260.

3T. H. Lewis discusses the location of the Chickasaw towns which De Soto visited in the National
Magazine, vol. 15, pp. 57-61, 1891-92, criticizing tho earlier investigations of Claiborne. The last word has
evidently not been said on this subject.

poche gttierhee Brce Ageia india

> fg

ee ree
T

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 415

for carriers so that he could set out in the morning, but early on
that very day the Indians suddenly fell upon the camp in four bands,
got past the sentinels with fire concealed in little pots—after the
manner of Gideon—set fire to the town, and attacked the Spaniards
so unexpectedly that only two were able to mount their horses, most
of which ran away or were killed. The men on foot were also
in such confusion that, had the Indians been aware of their advan-
tage and pressed it, the chroniclers testify that not a soul would have
survived. As it was, mistaking the horses running wildly about for
cavalry preparing to charge them, the Indians became frightened
and fled. Next day the badly shattered European force moved to
a smaller town a league away, where the Chickasaw chief himself
usually lived. There they set up a forge with bellows of bear skins
and began to manufacture new saddles and spears, and to retemper
their weapons. Fortunately for them the Indians left them in peace
until the new weapons had been completed, and eight days later, when
they ventured an assault, they were easily beaten off.1. TheChickasaw
thus have the distinction of being the tribe which came nearest to
putting an end to De Soto and his entire army, and the escape of the
whites was due rather to a number of fortuitous and unexpected cir-
cumstances than to their own foresight or bravery. In the interest
of history and ethnology we may consider ourselves fortunate that
the disaster was averted.

Neither the expedition of De Luna nor that of Pardo reached this
tribe, although the Napochies? with whom De Luna fought were
probably, in part at least, identical with the Napissa, noted by Iber-
ville in 1699 as having united with the Chickasaw.’ Spanish docu-
ments of the seventeenth century again mention them, but they do
not reemerge into clear light until the settlement of Carolina and
Louisiana. Woodward, in the account of his Westo discovery,
dated 1674, mentions Chickasaw in connection with the Kasihta and
Chiska Indians.‘ English traders had reached the Mississippi by
1700 and their first settlements among the Chickasaw must have
been made at the same period (see pl. 6). From then on the
Chickasaw formed a base for the extension of British trade and
British power, and they remained firmly attached to their English
allies until the period of the American Revolution.

Shortly before 1715 the Chickasaw and Cherokee drove the Shaw-
nee Indians from their long-established settlements on Cumberland
River.® In 1745 a band of Shawnee returned to this region but were

! Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, 1, pp. 100-108; 11, pp. 22-24, 131-138.
2 See pp. 231-240.

3 Margry, Déc., Iv, pp. 164, 180, 184.

4S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 461; and p. 307.

6’ Hanna, The Wilderness Trail, 1, p. 131,

416 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

shortly afterwards driven out and retired among the Creeks.1. Hay-
wood thus records the Chickasaw tradition regarding the event:

The Chickasaws formerly claimed for their nation, exclusively, all the lands north
of the Tennessee, and they have denied that the Cherokees were joined with them in
the war against the Shawnees when they were driven from their settlements in Cum-
berland. They said that the Shawnees first came up the Tennessee in canoes, and
thence up Bear Creek thirty miles; and there left their canoes, and came to war with
the Chickasaws, and killed several of their nation. The Chickasaw chiefs and war-
riors embodied and drove them off. From thence they went to the Creeks, and lived
with them for some time. They then returned and crossed at the Chickasaw Old
Field, above the Muscle Shoals. From thence they went to Duck River and the
Cumberland River, and settled there; and the Chickasaws discovered their settle-
ments. Two of the chiefs of the Chickasaws who were in those days their principal
leaders—the one named Opoia Matehah and the other Pinskey Matehah—raised their
warriors and went against the Shawnees, and defeated them and took all their horses
and brought them into the nation. The Cherokees, they said, had no share in the
conquest, and that they drove the Shawnees themselves, without any assistance from
any red people.

Haywood adds that ‘‘ this information is contained in a public doc-
ument of the nation, signed by Chenobee, the king, Maj. George Col-
bert, and others.”’ ?

This is part of a brief against the claims of the Cherokee to land
north of the Tennessee and must be interpreted in the light of that
fact, nor must too much confidence be placed in the particular narra-
tive given, since the mythizing tendency always lays hold of such
events, and, moreover, events belonging to several different years
may be crowded together to set off one main fact.

French writers hold the Chickasaw, or the British traders through
them, responsible in large part for the Natchez uprising of 1729, and
from what Adair tells us there was evidently ground for the accusa-
tion.? At any rate, after the Natchez had been defeated and driven
away by the Louisiana French, the latter turned their attention
to the Chickasaw as allies of those implacable foes, and Bienville
undertook to crush them by two simultaneous movements against
their towns, from the north and south. The movements were not
synchronized, however, and resulted in utter failure. D’Artaguette
led 140 whites and about 300 Indians from his post on the Illinois, but
between the Mississippi River and the Chickasaw country they were
set upon by Indians and their English allies at the town of Hashuk
humma,‘ their leader and a few others were captured and burned
to death, and the rest of the force killed or dispersed. The army
approaching from the south consisted of 500 French and numerous
Choctaw allies. They attacked one of the palisaded villages of the
Chickasaw, but were repulsed with heavy loss and retreated to
Mobile. The Chickasaw on their side are said to have had 60 killed,

1 Hanna, Wilderness Trail, 1, p. 241. 3 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., pp. 353-354,
3 Haywood, Hist, of Tenn., p. 426. 4 Warrenin Pub. Miss. Hist. Soc., vim, p. 550,

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 417

but felt this so keenly that according to Andrews, a Cherokee trader,
they ‘‘had quitted their lands and were drawn near to the Creeks,
who received them kindly.” This, however, may refer to the
Natchez, because the bulk of the Chickasaw certainly remained in
the same situation. Under date of June 15, 1738, the above trader
informed William Stephens that the Choctaw and French had fallen
out, and this news determined some Chickasaw who had come to
Carolina to return.'

To retrieve the disaster he had suffered, Bienville, in 1740, collected a
huge army on the Mississippi with which he hoped to deal his enemy a
crushing blow, but, being unable adequately to provision such a
force, the greater part was soon obliged to disband. A small expe-
dition, under the Canadian Céloron, moved on toward the Chickasaw,
who, believing it to be the advance guard of that huge host they
had seen assembling against them, entered into a peace agreement,
the terms of which on the surface were decidedly favorable to the
French. Nevertheless, the Chickasaw recovered their courage as
soon as the expedition had dissolved, the treaty became a dead
letter, and the Indians were soon raiding French posts and inter-
cepting canoes on the Mississippi as formerly. These wars were not
undertaken without great losses on their part. Adair, who was
with them in the forties, thus describes the manner in which their
numbers had become reduced:

The Chikkasah in the year 1720, had four large contiguous settlements, which lay
nearly in the form of three parts of a square, only that the eastern side was five miles
shorter than the western with the open part toward the Choktah. One was called
Yaneka, about a mile wide and six miles long, at the distance of twelve miles from
their present towns. Another was ten computed miles long, at the like distance
from their present settlements, and from one to two miles broad. The towns were
called Shatara, Chookheereso, Hykehah, Tuskawillao, and Phalacheho. The other
square was single, began three miles from their present place of residence, and ran
four miles in length, and one mile in breadth. This was called Chookka Pharaah,
or ‘‘the long house.’’ It was more populous than their whole nation contains at
present. The remains of this once formidable people make up the northern angle
of that broken square. They now scarcely consist of four hundred and fifty warriors,
and are settled three miles westward from the deep creek, in a clear tract of rich
land, about three miles square, running afterwards about five miles towards the N. W.
where the old fields are usually a mile broad. The superior number of their enemies
forced them to take into this narrow circle, for social defence; and to build their
towns on commanding ground, at such a convenient distance from one another as
to have their enemies, when attacked, between two fires.”

From the estimates of Chickasaw population given in even very
early times it would seem that this decrease was not as great as
Adair supposes; the matter will be taken up in another place.

Besides the towns above enumerated one or two additional Chicka-
saw settlements are to be mentioned. Adair speaks of a town occu-

1 Ga. Col. Does., Iv, pp. 134, 156. 2 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., pp. 352, 353.
148061 ° —22-—_27

418 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

pied by them ‘‘in the upper or most western part of the Muskohge
country, about 300 miles eastward of their own nation,” which was
known as “‘Ooe-asa,” the latter half of the word evidently from
Chickasaw a”sha, to settle, to stay.!. This can not have lasted long,
as we find Deed Taitt, in a letter written at Tukabachee, March
16, 1772, saying:

About nsec Chickasaws were at the Abicouchies lately wanting to settle in
this Nation; the Head man of the Town gave them leave to settle the Ground they
formerly possessed on Condition of their Continuing in this Land, they returned to
their own lands and it is uncertain whether they come back.’

The settlement must have been attempted, however, because 11
days later he met the very same number of Chickasaw in the Natchez
town, and he says of them:

These Chickasaws are making a Settlement on the side of a Creek called Caimulga,
about 15 miles north from this, and falling into the Coosa River at the Chickasaw
Trading path, about a mile above Clamahumgey.* :

As a ‘“‘Kiamulgatown” appears in the roll of towns taken just
before the removal it is possible that these Chickasaw continued
to occupy it until then, but it is more likely that they had been
displaced by Creeks, or perhaps Shawnee.*

Another Chickasaw settlement was made at a very early date near
New Windsor on the South Carolina side of Savannah River. This
was not later than the third decade of the eighteenth century, for in
1737, when they moved over to the newly established post of Au-
gusta, Georgia, it is said that they had been located at the former
place “‘for some time past.” A Chickasaw band continued near
Augusta probably down to the period of the American Revolution.
The chief of the band in 1737 was named the ‘‘Squirrel King.’’®

In June, 1755, we find reference to 35 Chickasaw Indians “that
usually reside about Augusta;’’® and under date of November 27,
1760, the same records speak of Chickasaw settled at New Savannah,
about 12 miles from Augusta.’ In 1795 the tribe laid claim to land
opposite Augusta on the basis of this early settlement, and a memorial
was sent to the United States Government to substantiate it,’ but
it was probably not occupied after the Revolution. The later his-
tory of the Savannah band is thus given by Hawkins, quoting Tasi-
kaia miko, a Kasihta chief. It contains an interesting hint regard-
ing the past history of the people under consideration.

1 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 54. Mr. Halbert interprets it very oraeeiBy as w viha ansha, ‘‘home of
emigrants,’ and identifies it with the Breed Camp mentioned in the census of 1761, perhaps because the
Chickasaw Indians are known to have been called ‘‘the breed.”

2 Mereness, Trav. in Amer. Col., pp. 525-526.

3 Tbid., pp. 531-532.

4 See p. 319.

5 Ga. Col. Rec., Iv, p. 47.

6 Tbid., vu, p. 206.

7 Tbid., vm, p. 433.

8 Ramsey, Ann. of Tenn., p. 81.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 419

Cussetuh and Chickasaw consider themselves as people of one fire (tote-kit-cau
humgoce) from the earliest account of their origin. Cussetuh appointed the first
Micco for them, directed him to sit down in the big Savanna, where they now are,
and govern them. Some of the Chickasaws straggled off and settled near Augusta,
from whence they returned and sat down near Cussetuh, and thence back to their
nation. Cussetuh and Chickasaw have remained friends ever since their first
acquaintance."

Hawkins adds that on account of this friendship the Kasihta
town refused to take part in the war between the Creeks and Chicka-
saw in 1795.1. As Hawkins wrote in 1799 it appears that this band
of Chickasaw had rejoined their own people by that date.

Still another outsettlement was on the lower course of the Ten-
nessee River, where it is mentioned by Coxe ? and some other very
early writers, but it was soon abandoned for the main settlements.
In comparatively late times a small body settled temporarily on
the Ohio.

In 1752 and 1753 the Chickasaw defeated MM. Benoist and
Reggio. Under date of August, 1754, the Colonial Documents of
Georgia inform us that the Chickasaw had been twice attacked,
evidently referrmg to these expeditions, and reported that they
could not stand a third assault without help Aid was in con-
sequence sent to them. A little later war broke out with the Chero-
kee and terminated about 1768 with a decisive Chickasaw victory on
the Chickasaw old fields.®

During this period they were harassed more by the Choctaw and
other French Indians than by the French, and their numbers fell off
greatly in consequence. Romans, who visited their towns in 1771,
compares them with the Choctaw rather to their own disadvantage.
He says that the Chickasaw towns, or ‘“‘town’’ as he chooses to call
it, “‘they divide into seven by the names of Melattaw (i. e., hat and
feather); Chatelaw (i. e., copper town); Chukafalaya (i. e., long town);
Hikihaw (i. e., stand still); Chucalissa (. e., great town) ;* Tuckahaw
(i. e., a certain weed); and Ashuck hooma (i. e., red grass); This
was formerly inclosed in palisadoes, and thus well fortified against
the attacks of small arms, but now it lays open.’’? He says that the
traders nicknamed this tribe ‘“‘the breed,” presumably on account
of the extent to which it had intermixed with others and with the
whites. He himself declares that there were only two genuine
Chickasaw of the old stock living—one a man named Northwest.

The fidelity which this tribe had displayed with but individual
exceptions toward the English was afterwards transferred to the
Americans, and few disputes arose between the two peoples. In
1786 official relations with the United States Government began

1 Hawkins, Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., mm, p. 83. ’ Haywood, Hist. of Tenn., pp. 446-462,
1 French, Hist. Colls. La., 1850, p. 229. 6 The translation is wrong. It means “town
3 Romans, Concise Nat. Hist. E. and W. Fla.,p. 59. deserted.”

‘Ga. Col. Rec., v1, pp. 448-450. 7 Romans, op. cit., p. 63.

4920 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

when, by the Hopewell treaty, their northern boundary was placed
at the Ohio.! In 1793-1795 war broke out with the Creeks, who
invaded the Chickasaw country to the number of 1,000. Here they
attacked a small stockade. They were met by a mere handful of
Chickasaw, but an unaccountable panic seized the invaders, who
fled precipitately. This victory was won by a body of about 200
Chickasaw. Soon afterwards peace was made.

Although they were at peace with the white settlers, the latter
after this time began to press steadily in upon the Chickasaw, who,
by a treaty signed July 23, 1805, made their first cession of territory
to the United States Government. Further Ccessions were made
September 14, 1816, October 19, 1818, and October 20, 1832. By
the provisions of the treaty signed on the date last mentioned they
yielded up their right to all of their lands to the east of the Missis-
sippi * and accepted new homes in the territory now included in the
State of Oklahoma. The actual migration began in 1822, ten years
before the treaty was signed, and extended to 1838. Together
with the Choctaw they occupied what is now the southeastern part
of this State between the Arkansas and Canadian Rivers on the
north and the Red River on the south. The two tribes mingled to-
gether rather indiscriminately at first, but were separated in 1855,
the Chickasaw being assigned the westernmost part of the above
area. Here a national government was established after the pattern
of those of the Choctaw and the other ‘‘civilized tribes,’ and this
lasted until the nation merged into the State of Oklahoma, of which
the Chickasaw are now citizens.

THE CHOCTAW

The present work has been undertaken primarily with the object
of furnishing an adequate setting for an understanding of the evolu-
tion of the Creek Confederacy and the various elements entering
into it. What has been said regarding the South Carolina and
Florida tribes and the Chickasaw have marginal importance in the
carrying out of this purpose, though they are of less absolute concern.
When we come to the Choctaw, however, we are met with a different
problem. 'The Choctaw were always one of the largest southern
tribes, and they were more numerous than the Creeks even in the
palmiest days of the latter. Although of the same linguistic stock,
their customs, social organization, and even their physical charac-
teristics Were very different. They never seem to have been on
a footing of friendship with the Creeks, and in fact fought them on
equal terms during a long period. So far as our acquaintance with
them extends they appear to have been a relatively homogeneous

1 Highteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., part 2, p. 650.
3 Haywood, Hist. Tenn., p. 461; also Stiggins’s MS.
3 See Eighteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., part 2.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 421

people, whose history lacks the complication of that of most of the
tribes so far considered. While it is capable of extended treat-
ment, for our present purpose a few words will tell all about it
that we need to know. It is probable that the Apafalaya chief and
river spoken of by Ranjel and the Pafallaya province of Elvas,' refer to
the Choctaw, or to some of them, since Adair informs us that ‘‘ Long
Hairs,’’ (Pa"s-falaya) was a name given to the Choctaw by their
neighbors.2, We do not hear of the tribe again until late in the
seventeenth century, when they occupied the region in the south-
eastern part of the present State of Mississippi and the southwestern
part of Alabama, which they held until their removal to Oklahoma
in the fourth decade of the nineteenth century. A small portion of
them have remained in their old country to the present day, while a
few are to be found in Louisiana.

POPULATION OF THE SOUTHEASTERN TRIBES

The population ot an Indian tribe at any early period in its history
can not be determined with exactness. In the case of the Creeks we
have to consider not only the Muskogee or Creeks proper, but a num-
ber of tribes afterwards permanently or temporarily incorporated
with them, and the problem is proportionately complicated. For-
tunately we are helped out by a considerable number of censuses,
some of which were taken with more than usual care.

The Cusabo tribes were always small, even at the time of their
first intercourse with the Spaniards and French, but we have no
data regarding their population until the year 1715, just before the
outbreak of the Yamasee war, when a careful estimate approaching
an actual enumeration as closely as was possible at that time was
made under the auspices of Governor Johnson of South Carolina.
There were then two bands left belonging to this group. The ‘‘Corsa-
boys” (i. e., the Cusabo proper) are credited with five villages, 95
men, and a total population of 295, while the Itwans of Charleston En-
trance had but one village, with 80 men, and a total population of
240. The entire population of this group was therefore 535, and they
are already described as ‘‘mixed with the English settlement.’’ The
Yamasee war depleted their numbers considerably. Most of them
probably remained in the same place, where they progressively de-
clined and disappeared, though a few retired among the inland In-
dians. The Coosa are not separately enumerated in this list, and it is
uncertain whether they were omitted or are included among the
Cusabo. According to Adair some of them later joined the Catawba,
but probably not all.

1 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 99; 1, pp. 129-130.

2 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 192.

3S. Car. MS. Docs. at Columbia; also Rivers, Chap. in Early Hist. 8S. Car., p. 94.
‘ Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 225.

499, BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The province of Guale, between Savannah River and St. Andrews -

Sound, was evidently very populous in early Spanish times; but
Barcia represents the number of Indians there to have been con-
siderably reduced as a result of the first uprising against the mis-
sionaries at the end of the sixteenth century.!. In 1602 the mis-
sionaries claimed that there were ‘‘more than 1,200 Christians’’ in

Guale. In 1670 Owen estimated that there were about 300 Indians’

under the priest at St. Catherines, and that the Indians under all of
the priests upon that coast would totai 700.2 Arnong these may be
included a few Timucua, but most were Guale Indians and Yamasee.
The figures refer merely to the number of effective men, not to the
total population. After these Indians had settled in South Carolina
under the leadership of the Yamasee they occupied 10 towns which in
1708 were estimated to contain 500 men able to bear arms,* and in
1715, just before the Yamasee uprising, they were reported to have
413 men and a total population of 1,215.4 The war which followed
sadly depleted them and their losses continued after they had retired
to Florida, whither they were pursued by the English and with still
more effect by the Creeks. Almost immediately after they had been
driven out of Carolina the English settlers learned that one of their
chiefs had been made by the Spaniards general in chief over 500 In-
dians to be sent against Carolina, but of course only a fraction of these
were Yamasee.’ By this time they had probably become completely
merged with the Indians of Guale. In 1719 a captive reported only
60 Yamasee near St. Augustine. In 1728 and 1736 we have from
Spanish sources detailed statements of the population of all the
Indian towns near St. Augustine,” and these agree very closely,
although a disastrous British raid had taken place between them.
The first mentions seven settlements with an aggregate population
of 115 to 125 men, 105 women, and upward of 55 children, the number
of children in two towns not being given. The second list gives
eight towns with 123 men capable of bearing arms and 295 women
and children, a total of 418. Fifty or more belonged to the Timucua
town and there are two or three Apalachee, but upward of 360 must
have been Yamasee or Indians of Guale. While this figure is con-
siderably higher than the total indicated in the earlier list the numbers
of men reported in both agree quite closely and there is reason to
think that in the earlier the numbers of children, and probably
those of the women also, were considerably underestimated. In 1761
Yamasee numbering 20 men were reported living near St. Augus-
tine,® but we know that several bodies were settled elsewhere. Some

1 Barcia, La Florida, pp. 170-172. 6 Pub. Ree. of S. C., MS., vu, p. 186.

2S. Car. Hist. Soc. Colls., v, p. 198. 6 Tbid., vim, p. 7.
3 Pub. Rec. of 8S. C., MS., v, pp. 207-209. 7 See pp. 105-106, 304.

4S. C. MS. Does. at Columbia. 84 Descr. of S. C., ete., 1761, p. 63.

4
ca
3
*
j
:
;

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 493

of them constituted the village of Yamacraw with which Oglethorpe
had to deal. In Adair’s time a few were with the Catawba.' In
1821 the ‘“‘Emusas’’ on Chattahoochee River, whom I believe to
have been descendants of the Yamasee, numbered 20 souls.?

It is evident that the Apalachee were a large tribe at the very
earliest period, but they certainly did not number 15,000, 16,000,
30,000, or 34,000, as estimated by various Spanish missionaries.*
Much more probable is the statement in a memorial, dated 1676, to
the effect that there were then 5,000.4 In 1702 we find it stated that
Spaniards planned to fall upon the English settlements at the head
of 900 Apalachee Indians.’ From Moore’s report on his destruction
of the Apalachee towns in the winter of 1703-04 it appears that he
and his Indian allies killed about 400 Apalachee and brought away
1,400.8 Two towns and part of another did not come with him. He
expected some of them to follow, but they fled for the most part to
Mobile to place themselves under the protection of the French.’
Bienville states that these originally numbered 500 men but by 1725
or 1726 had become reduced to 100,§ partly from natural causes,
partly through removal to Pensacola. In 1708 the Apalachee who
had been carried off by the Carolinians and settled on Savannah
River numbered about 250 men.* The census of 1715 gives their
population more accurately as 275 men and 638 souls in four vil-
lages.° A French manuscript of a little later period estimates 600
men.'! After the Yamasee war all of these seem to have returned to
Florida, and in 1718 they started a town near Pensacola, where it is
said that more than 100 settled, and they increased every day after-
wards, partly from the Apalachee who had been living near Mobile.”
Acéording to Governor De la Vega the Apalachee in their old country
had in 1728 become reduced to two villages, one of 140 persons, the
other of 29.8 In 1758 De Kerlerec gives the number of their warriors
as 30, probably including both the Spanish and the French bands."
In 1764, after the cession of Mobile to Great Britain, the Apalachee,
along with several other tribes, moved over into Louisiana and settled
on Red River. In 1806 we learn from Sibley that they counted but
14 men.'® Whether this band embraced both the Mobile and Florida
Apalachee is uncertain, but probably all went together. Morse re-
ported 150 in Louisiana in 1817, a very considerable overestimate."

! Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 225. 10 Tbid.; also Rivers, A Chapter in the Early Hist.
2 Morse, Rept. on Ind. Affairs, p. 364. of S. C., p. 94.

3 See p. 118. 11 Copy of MS. in Lib. Cong.

4 Lowery, MSS. 2 Barcia, La Florida, p. 341.

6 Carroll, Hist. Colls. 8. C., 0, p. 351. 13 See p. 127.

6 See pp. 121-123. 144 Compte Rendu, XV sess. Internat. Cong. Am.,
7 See p. 123. I, p. 86.

‘8 Copy of MS. in Lib. Cong. W Sibley, Annals of Cong., 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1085.

® Pub. Ree. of S. C., Ms., Vv, pp. 207-209. 16 Morse, Rept. to the Sec. of War, p. 373.

494 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Only one or two Indians of Apalachee blood are now known to be in
existence in Louisiana and Texas. There are a very few among the
Alabama in Oklahoma.

We have no estimate of the number of Apalachicola Indians until
they were removed to the Savannah. In 1708 the number of their
men was 80.!_ In the census of 1715 they are credited with 2 villages,
64 men, and 214 souls.? After the Yamasee war they settled upon
Chattahoochee River, at first all in one town. Later several bands
left, most of them going south into Florida. By the census of
1738,? and the French census of 1760,‘ those that remained were
credited with 60 men, by the French estimate of 1750 with more
than 30, by the English census of 1761 with 20,° by the Georgia cen-
sus of 1792 with 100, including the Chiaha (p.435), and in the census
of 1832 with 2 settlements and 239 persons besides 7 slaves.° The
census of 1738 gives, however, what is probably another band of
Apalachicola Indians under the name of their chief, Cherokee leechee,
and credits them with 45 men.’ At the present time there are only
a few left, living near Okmulgee, Oklahoma.

The Franciscan missionaries reported 300 conversions among the
Chatot in 1674. When they settled near Mobile Bienville states
that they could muster 250 men, but in 1725-26 they had become
reduced to 40 men.’ Du Pratz says this tribe occupied about 40
cabins, circa 1730.° In 1806, after: their removal to Louisiana, they
numbered 30 men.’® In 1817 there were, all told, according to
Morse, 240," a figure much too large. They have now disappeared,
unless they are represented by some band of Choctaw and their
name concealed by that of the larger tribe.

No separate enumeration of the Tawasa and Pawokti is available,
except in the census of 1760, which returns about 40 Tawasa!
men, the Georgia census of 1792, which reports about 60, and the
1832 census, where, including Autauga, 321 are given, with 21 negro
slaves. It is probable, however, that this last includes all of the
Alabama at that time remaining in the Creek Nation.

The Sawokli united with the Lower Creeks. In 1738 the Spaniards
estimated the number of their men at 20.14 In 1750, however, four
Sawokli settlements appear to be named with more than 50 men"
and in 1760 four with a total of 190.% The Tamal are perhaps

1 Pub. Rec. of S. C., MS., pp. 207-209. 9 Du Pratz, Hist. de la Louisiane, 0, pp. 212-213.

2 Rivers, Chap. in Early Hist. 8. C., p. 94. 10 Sibley, Annals of Cong., 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1087.
3 Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. 1. Morse, Rept. to the Sec. of War, p. 373.

4 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 96. 12 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, pp. 94-95.

5 Ga. Col. Rec., vl, p. 522. 13Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 258-260.
6 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., pp. 345-347. 14 MS., Ayer Coll.

7 Copy of MS. in Ayer Coll., Newberry Lib. 15 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 96.

8 Copy of MS. in Lib. Cong.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 495

included in this last census. In 1761 they and the neighboring
villages, probably of the same connection, were estimated to con-
tain only 50 hunters... Hawkins says that Sawoklutci contained 20
families, but gives no figures for Sawokh itself.2 Young (1821) gives
a town called Ehawho-ka-les, apparently intended for Sawokh, having
150 inhabitants.t He gives 580 in Okitiyagana.* The census of
1832 gives 187 Sawokli, besides 42 slaves, 157 in its branch town,
Okawaigi, and 106 in another branch, Hatcheetcaba.‘ The few still
living are about Okmulgee, Oklahoma.

The Pensacola Indians were so insignificant in historic times that
Bienville, writing in 1725 or 1726, says there were not more than
40 men in their village and that of the neighboring Biloxi together.®
In 1764 John Stuart places them in one group with the Biloxi, Chatot,
Capinans, Washa, Chawasha, and Pascagoula, and allows them all
but 241 men.°

From the De Soto narratives we know that the Mobile Indians
were once a powerful people. The numbers lost by them when the
Spaniards stormed their town—2,500 according to Elvas, over 3,000
according to Ranjel—at once testify to this fact and to the terrible
blow they then suffered.?. In 1702, when Iberville was in the Pas-
cagoula village on the river of the same name, he was given to under-
stand that the Mobile tribe had 300 warriors and the Tohome as many
more, but two years later he visited them himself and estimated that
both together comprised only about 350.8 Du Pratz, about 1730,
says that the Tohome were of approximately the same size as the
Chatot, which he estimates to include about 40 cabins, but he gives
nothing with reference to the population of the Mobile.’ In 1758
De Kerlerec estimates the Mobile Tohome and Naniaba at about 100
warriors.'°

In 1725-26 Bienville states that the Mobile numbered only 60 men,
the Big Tohome 60, and the Little Tohome—probably identical with
the Naniaba—30, and he adds that within his own remembrance the
former had counted 500 and the latter 300."' This is difficult to recon-
cile with the statements made by his brother. Regis de Rouillet, in
1730, gives the number of warriors as 30, 60, and 50, respectively,
making the Mobile the smallest of the three."

1 Ga. Col. Rec., vim, p. 522.
2 Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 66.

3 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War., p. 364.

4 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 342-344.
5 Copy of MS. in Lib. Cong.

6 Am. Hist. Rev., Xx, p. 825.

7 Bourne, Narr. of De Soto, I, p. 97; 1, p. 128.

8 Margry, Déc., Iv, pp. 427, 514.

9 Du Pratz, Hist. Louisiane, 0, p. 213.
10 Compte Rendu Int. Cong. Amér., 1906, I, p. 85.
*tMS., Lib. Cong.

426 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

As we have seen, there were two distinct bands of Chiaha, one on
the Tennessee and one originally near the Yamasee, later among the
Lower Creeks. The first are scarcely heard of after De Soto’s time
until we come to the census of 1832, which mentions two towns, one
of 126 and the other of 306 Indians. These may have been descendants
of this northern body, or a later settlement from the other Creek
towns. The second body is said to have numbered 120 men in 1738,
160 in 1760, and in 1761, as has already been said, together with
the Osochi and Okmulgee, 120 hunters. In 1792 they and the
Apalachicola together were reputed to have 100 gunmen (p. 435).
Hawkins states that the Chiaha and Osochi branch settlement of Hotal-
gihuyana contained 20 families in 1799.4. Young (1821) enumerates
670 Chiaha proper and 210 Hotalgihuyana Indians.° According
to the census of 1832 the Chiaha and Hotalgihuyana counted 427
Indians and 70 slaves.®

The enumeration of 1750 estimates the number of Osochi men at
30, but that of 1760 has 50.7. In the English census of 1761 they
and the Chiaha and Okmulgee are given together 120 men,* in 1792
they appear alone credited with 50 men (p. 434), while in the
American census taken in 1832 are two Osochi towns with an agegre-
gate Indian population of 539.°

In 1738 we find the number of Hitchiti men placed at 60, in 1750
at only 15,7 and in 1760 at 50.!° In 1761 it was estimated that they
had 40 hunters," and in 1772 Taitt says there were ‘‘about 90 gun-
men.”’!? Young gives the population of the Fowl Towns, occupied largely
by Hitchiti Indians, as 300 in 1821.% In 1832 they are credited,
including a branch village, with a population of 381, besides 20
negro slaves.'4 Though still fairly numerous they are more or less
confounded with other groups speaking a similar language.

The Okmulgee are enumerated first in 1750, when they are credited
with more than 20 men, and the census of 1760 gives them 30 men.’°
In 1761 they are said to have had, together with the Chiaha and
Osochi, 120 hunters.11 Hawkins does not give their numbers, but

1 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 307-309.
2MS., Ayer Coll.

3 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 96; Ga. Col. Docs., vm, p. 522.
4 Hawkins in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 64.

5 Page 409; Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 364.

6 Sen. Doc. 512, pp. 350-352. :

7™MS., Ayer Coll.; Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 96.

8 Ga. Col. Does., VI, p. 522.

10 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., Iv, p. 512.

11 Miss. Prov. Arch., op. cit.

12 Ga. Col. Docs., op. cit.

18 Trav. in Am. Col., p. 548.

14 Morse, op. cit.
16 Sen. Doc. 512, pp. 347-350.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 427

Morse in 1822 says, on the authority of Young, that there were 220
in allt’ They may be one of the two Osochi towns in the list of
1832 which number almost alike.2 The omission of their name is
strange since, after the removal to Oklahoma, -they constituted a
very important town.

In 1738, 50 men are given as belonging to the Oconee, in 1750, 30
men,’ and in 1760, 50 men.t In 1761 we find ‘“Oconees big and
little” given with 50 hunters.® There were evidently fewer in
Hawkins’s time, but meanwhile many of them had gone to Florida.

The Spanish census of 1738 includes two Tamali towns—old Tamali
(Tamaxle el viejo) and new Tamati (Tamaxle nuevo), the first with
12 men, the second with 26.6 The latter, however, was probably in
the main a Sawokli settlement.?. The French estimate of 1750 men-
tions only one town of 10 men.’ No further reference to the popula-
tion of this town appears until we come to Young’s enumeration of
the Seminole towns included in Morse’s report, where the total popu-
lation appears as 220.8

The only references bearing on the population of the Tamahita
tribe are in the census list of 1750, where the “‘Tamaita”’ among the
Lower Creeks are set down as having more than 18 men,? and in that of
1761 where the ‘“‘Coosawtee including Tomhetaws”’ are credited with
125 hunters.’ But see pp. 188-191.

In 1702 Iberville estimated that the Alabama Indians consisted of
400 families in two villages.!° This enumeration would, of course,
not include the Tawasa, nor probably the Pawokti, but, on the
other hand, may have embraced some Koasati. The same limita-
tions would probably apply to the figures in the Carolina census of
1715, in which we find them given four villages, 214 men, and a total
population of 770." According toa French manuscript of the third
decade of the same century there were then 6 Alabama towns and
400 men.” The estimate of 1750 seems to mention only two Alabama
towns with 15 and 40 men, respectively. De Kerlerec places the
number of Alabama warriors at 1,000 in 1758, but he includes the
Talapoosa Indians and Abihka, therefore his figure is of no value.'
The census of 1760 gives about 40 Tawasa men and 50 Mugulasha,
while a town which perhaps corresponds to Okchaiutci contained
100 men.'* The census of 1761 gives 30 hunters for Muklasa, 20 for
Okchaiutci, and 70 for Wetumpka and ‘‘Red Ground,” the second
of which was probably also an Alabama settlement, but there is no

1 Morse, op. cit. 8 See p. 409.

2 Sen. Doc. 512, pp. 353-356. 9 Ga. Col. Docs., vil, p. 524.

3 MSS., Ayer Coll. 10 Margery, Déc., Iv, p. 514.

4 Miss. Prov. Arch., op. cit. ul Rivers, Chap. Early Hist. 8. C., p. 94.

5 Ga. Col. Docs., op. cit. 13 MS., Lib.Cong.

6 Copy of MSS., Ayer Coll. 13 Compte Rendu, Int. Cong. Am., xv sess., I, p. 83.

7 See p. 143. 14 Miss Prov. Arch., I, p. 94.

498 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

reference to Pawokti, Tawasa, or Autauga, though at this time they
must have been among the Upper Creeks... Henry Bouquet in 1764
gives 6,000 warriors[!],? and Marbury in 1792 has 60 Alabama Indians,
40 Okchaiutci, 30 Muklasa, and apparently 60 Tawasa (including Red
Ground), though his spelling renders this uncertain. Hawkins in
1799 estimated the Alabama proper—Tawasa, Pawokti, and
Autauga—to comprise about 80 gun men, but he does not give the
number of those in Okchaiutci or Muklasa.? Stiggins places the num-
ber of Alabama in 1814 at 2,000, which is excessive.’ In 1832 the
Alabama are represented only by Tawasa and Autauga with a com-
bined population of 321 and 21 slaves. This was after the separa-
tion of those Alabama who went to Louisiana and Texas. In 1806
Sibley states that there were two Alabama villages in Louisiana, one
containing about 30, the other about 40 men.®° According to Morse,
in 1817, there were 160 Alabama, all told, in Texas, but he prob-
ably overlooked some bands.’

In 1882 the United States Indian Office reported, or rather esti-
mated, 290 ‘“‘Alabama, Kushatta, and Muskogee” in the State of
Texas,*® and the same figure is repeated without variation in every
subsequent report until 1901, when 470 are given on the authority
of the census of 1900.° This figure is repeated until 1911. In 1910
a special agent was sent to these people from the Indian Office to in-
quire into their condition and make an enumeration of them, but
his instructions did not cover the Koasati Indians, who were con-
sequently ignored. The number of Alabama was found to be 192;
the Koasati were estimated along with some Seminole, Isleta, and
other Indians in different parts of the State.!° These figures were
repeated in the Indian Office Reports for 1912, 1913, and 1914. The
census of 1910 returned 187 Alabama in Texas and 111 in Louisiana—
a total of 298. The number of those in Oklahoma is small, but there
are enough to maintain a square ground. No separate enumeration
of them has been made, so far as I am aware.

By the earliest writers the Koasati were probably included among
the Alabama. The first independent enumeration of them is in the
estimate of 1750, which gives 50 men. ‘That of 1760 gives 150 men.%*

1 Ga. Col. Does., vil, pp. 523-524.

2 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, m1, p. 559.

3Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., OI, p. 37.

4Stiggins, MS.

5 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 258-260.
6 Ann. of Cong., 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1085.

7 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 373.

8 Rept. Comm. Ind. Aff. for 1882 p. 340.

9 Tbid., 1901, p. 702.

10 Tbid., 1911, p. 67.
11 Ind. pop. of the U. S., census of 1910, p. 17.
12 MS., Ayer Coll.; Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 94.

ie thes POR aabe «a0.

SWANTON] KARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 499

In the census of 1761 they and the Tamahita together are reported as
having had 125 hunters.'' At least 100 of these were undoubtedly
Koasati. Taitt, writing in 1772, reports 40 ‘‘Alibamons”’ here.2 He
probably means 40 gunmen. In 1792 Marbury credits them with
130 men (see p. 437). About 1793 some of them began to move to
Louisiana and others followed from time to time. Those that were
left. in 1832 numbered 82 according to the census of that year.* In
1806 Sibley states that the Koasati in Louisiana supposed the num-
ber of men in all their settlements there to reach 200.4 Schermerhorn
estimates their number on the Sabine in 1814 at 609.2 Morse, in
1817, gives 350 on Red River, 50 on the Neches 40 miles above its
mouth, and 240 on the Trinity, a total of 640 men, women, and
children.’ In 1829 Porter gives 180 Koasati.? Bollaert in 1850
estimated the number of warriors among the Koasati on the lower
Trinity alone at 500 in two villages. After 1882 they were enumer-
ated by the Indian Office along with the Alabama as given above.
In 1910 11 were with the Alabama in Texas, 85 in Louisiana, and 2
in Nebraska—a total of 98.° A few more are in Oklahoma.

There were two branches of the Tuskegee, one of which united with
the Cherokee. The latter was probably small and I have no data
regarding it. The other is set down in the census of 1750 as
containing 10 men, in that of 1760 as containing 50 men," and
in that of 1761 as containing, along with “‘Coosaw old town,’ 40
hunters." Taitt, in 1772, gives about 25 gunmen,” as does Marbury
in 1792 (p.437). In 1799 Hawkins says they had 35 gunmen." The
census of 1832 returned 216 Indians and 35 slaves."

The Spanish census of 1738 gives 111 men in Kasihta,” the French
census of 1750 more than 80,!° and that of 1760, 150,!° while that of
1761 places the number of hunters belonging to it at 100.17. With
this Taitt (1772) agrees,’* but Marbury (1792) raises it, counting in
the villages, to 375 (p. 434). In 1799 Hawkins estimated the number

1 Ga. Col. Rec., vil, p. 524.
2 Trav. in Am. Col., p. 536.
3 Sen. Doe. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 265-266.
4 Sibley in Ann. Cong., 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1085.
5 Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., 0, p. 26.
6 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 373.
7 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, m1, p. 596.
8 Jour. Eth. Soc. of London, 2, p. 282.
‘Ind. Pop., Bur. of Census, p. 18.
10 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 94.
11 Ga. Col]. Rec., val, p. 524.
12 Trav.in Am. Col., p. 541.
13 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., mm, p. 39.
14 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 265-266.
16 Copy of MS., Ayer Coll.
16 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 96.
17 Ga. Col. Rec., vil, p. 522.
18 Trav. in Am. Col., p. 550.

430 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73 —

of gunmen here at 180, although they themselves placed it at 300." It
was then the largest town in the nation. The census of 1832 gives
them seven distinct settlements and a total population of 1,918
Indians and 134 slaves.2, They are now, of course, much reduced in
numbers.

The estimate of Coweta men in 1738 was 132,? in 1750, 80+,‘ in
1760, 150,5 and in 1761, 130 hunters are enumerated.* Taitt (1772)
gives 220 gunmen in ‘‘Coweta, Little Coweta, and Bigskin Creek,” 7
and Marbury (1792) puts the number of men in Coweta and its vil-
lages at 280. (p. 434). Hawkins places the number of gunmen in
Coweta Tallahassee and its outvillages in 1799 at 66 by actual count
against a claimed total by the people themselves of 100, but he
furnishes no figure for Coweta itself. The census of 1832 enumerated
five Coweta settlements with a total population of 896 Indians and 67
slaves.? To this must be added the Indians of Broken Arrow,” which,
if we could trust this census, would increase the Coweta Indians by
1,082 Indians and 59 slaves.® It is evident, however, that among
the five Broken Arrow towns here enumerated two or three are really
Okfuskee villages and probably only the two first mentioned towns
represent this division. If this is so, the Broken Arrow population
would number only 438 Indians and 31 slaves, which would raise the
total Coweta population to 1,334 Indians and 99 slaves. They have
since fallen off very rapidly in numbers.

The Coosa Indians were evidently powerful and numerous in De
Soto’s time. Pardo reported that in 1567 the Coosa town had 150
neighborhoods—i. e., small villages." Garcilasso says there were
500 houses, but he is notoriously given to exaggeration when it comes
to figures of any sort.'? Those of the De Luna expedition who visited
Coosa in 1559 reported that the principal town of the province had
30 houses, a figure which may be accepted as approximately correct.
They add that there were seven other villages in its neighborhood,
‘five of them smaller and two larger,’’ and allowing 20 houses
on the average to each of these we should have about 170
houses, by which I suppose we are to understand 170 different family
establishments.'* This would furnish the amount of leeway that

1 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., 1m, p. 59.

2 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 363-398.

3 Copy of MS., Ayer Coll.

4MS., Ayer Coll.

5 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 96.

6 Ga. Col. Rec., vil, p. 522.

7 Trav. in Am. Col., p. 549.

8 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 56.

9 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., Iv, pp. 379-386.

10 The population of Broken Arrow is referred to by only one other writer. Thisis David Taitt in 1772,
who gives 60 gunmen. See Mereness, Trav. in Am. Col., p. 549.

1 Ruidiaz, La Florida, 1, p. 484.

12 Garcilasso, in Shipp, De Soto and Fla., p. 374.

18 Barcia, La Florida, p. 32. ®

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 431

Garcilasso’s figuring always requires, and it is not far out of the way
as compared with Pardo’s, if the latter’s 150 “vecinos”” means family
groups. When Coosa reappears in history the town is small and
decayed, but, as explained elsewhere, there is every reason to believe
that the Coosa tribe continued to be represented by a number of the
leading towns of the Creek Confederacy.

The Spanish census of 1738 gives 100 men in Coosa and 414 in the
Coosa group of towns.t The French estimate of 1750 gives 30+ in
the town and 240+ in the group.?. In 1760 the Coosa group of
towns numbered about 430 men, and in 1761 about 270 hunters are
reported in them.* In 1792 the ‘‘Coosa of Chickasaw Camp’ were
credited with 80 men, and all the Coosa offshoots together with 440.4
According to the figures furnished by Hawkins the entire Coosa con-
nection would number upward of 520, and by the census of 1832 the
erand total was 3,792 Indians, about one-sixth of the entire Creek
population.

The Abihka are treated as a distinct tribe by many early writers,
but the Coosa Indians are sometimes included with them, and per-
haps others. This appears to be the case, for instance, in the census
of 1715 which returned 15 Abihka towns with 502 men and a total
population of 1773.2. In 1738 Abihkutci, the only Abihka town
given, was estimated to contain 30 men.t. In 1750 the same town
is set down with more than 60 inhabitants,? in 1760 with 130 men®
and in 1761, 50 hunters.?. Taitt in 1772 estimates 45 gunmen,’ and
Marbury (1792) puts the figure as low as 15 (p.435). In 1832 Talla-
dega, Abihkutci, and Kan-tcadi are separately entered with a com-
bined population of 905, exclusive of slaves.°

In 1738 the Wakokai included 100 men,! in 1750 60+,” in 1760
100 men," and in 1761 60 hunters.” Taitt (1772) gives 100 gunmen;
Marbury (1792) 300 (p. 487). In 1832 the combined population of
Wiogufla, Tukpafka, and Sakapadai was 942 Indians and 5 slaves.”

1 Copy of MS., Ayer Coll.

2MS., Ayer Coll.
_ §Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 95; Ga. Col. Rec., vim, p.523. David Taitt (Travels in Am. Col., pp. 502, 528)
states in his diary of 1772 that some years before his time Okfuskee numbered 300 gunmen but the town
had then spread out so much into branch villages that there were only about 30 gunmen in the old set-
tlement. Inthe same way Great Tulsa which had once contained 100 gunmen had become reduced to
“not above thirty” by the settlement of two outvillages, one 8, the other 25 miles off. The Coosa towns
at about that time must have contained upward of 400 gunmen.

‘MS., Lib. Cong.

5 Rivers, Chap. Early Hist. S. Car., p. 94.

6 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 95.

7 Ga. Col. Rec., vim, p. 523.

8 Trav. in Am. Col., p. 534.

§Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., IV, pp. 304-307, 315-318.

10 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 95.

1 Trav.in Am. Col., p. 535.

12 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 286-293.

432 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

In 1738 the Hotiwahali were credited with 10 men,! in 1750 with 15,?
in 1760 with 70,3 and in 1761 with 35 hunters.4 Marbury, in 1792,
places the number of men as high as 110 (p. 435). In 1832 this town
and its branch, Laplako, appear with a population of 607 Indians
and 36 slaves.°

The number of gunmen in Hilibi and its branches is given suc-
cessively as 80 in 1738,' 20 in 1750,? 80 in 1760,° 40 in 1761,’ 100 in
1772,° 160 in 1732, and in 1832 the total population was reported
as 804 souls, exclusive of slaves."

In 1738 there were reported 131 Eufaula men among both Upper
and Lower Creeks;! in 1750, 25+ ;? and in 1760, 160." In 1761 they
had 125 hunters,” and in 1792 Marbury estimates 80 men in the two
towns among the Upper Creeks but does not include the one upon the
Chattahoochee (pp. 436-437). Hawkins gives 70 gunmen in Upper
Eufaula,’ but ventures no estimate of the other Eufaula settlements.
Young (1822) gives 670 Lower Eufaula Indians. In 1832 there were
1,440 Eufaula Indians of the upper and lower towns with 21 slaves.

Atasi is reported to have had 56 men in 1738,’ 40+ in 1750,’ 80 in
1760,* and 50 hunters in 1761.4. In 1772 Taitt estimated 60 gunmen,*®
but Marbury in 1792 only half that number (p. 435). According to
Hawkins they had 43 gunmen in 1766, afterwards increased to 80,
and in his time, 1799, they had fallen off again to 50 gunmen.” The
population, in 1832 is given as 358."8 ~

In 1738 Kolomi appears with 50 men,' in 1750 with 25; in 1760,
1761, and 1792 with 50;° but no figures are given by Hawkins.

The Pakan Tallahassee Indians were estimated to have 60 men
in 1738,! 10 in 1750,? 100 in 1760,” 75 hunters in 1761, 20 gunmen
in 1772,2' and 50 in 1792 (p. 435), and are credited with a population
of 288 in the census of 1832.22, When the last enumeration was made
part had gone to Louisiana. In 1806 Sibley says these comprised
about 30 men.?8 |

The Okchai towns are supposed to have counted, all together in
1738, 200 men;' in 1750, 80;? in 1760, 200 men; and in 1761, 125
hunters.” In 1792 they are pyramided up to 385, including, how-
ever, the town of Opillako (p. 436). In 1832 the Indian population

1 Copy of MS., Ayer Coll. 18 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., mm, p. 48.
2MS., Ayer Coll. ; 14 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 364.
8 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 95. P 15 Sen. Doe. 512, op. cit., pp. 275-278, 337-342; 378-379.
4 Ga. Col. Rec., Vim, p. 523. 16 Trav.in Am. Col., p. 540.
5 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 255- 17 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m, p. 32.
258, 268-270. 18 Sen. Doc. 512, op. cit., pp. 252-254.
6 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p. 95. 19 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 94; Ga. Col. Rec., op. cit.
7 Ga. Col. Ree., Vi, p. 523. 20 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 94.
8 Trav. in Am. Col., p. 530. 21 Mereness, Trav. in Am. Col., p. 535.
9MS., Lib. Cong. 22 Sen. Doe. 512, op. cit., pp. 285-286.
10 Sen. Doe. 512; op. cit., pp. 296-297, 318-323. 23 Sibley, in Ann. Cong., 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1086.
11 Miss. Prov. Arch., £, pp. 95-96. 24 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, pp. 94-95.

12 Ga. Col. Rec., vi, pp. 522-523. 2 Ga. Col. Rec., vm, pp. 523-524.

|
.
|

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 433

is given as 1,375.1 At the present day their numbers proportion-
ately are well kept up.

Although the connection is not established beyond doubt I will
consider Tukabahchee and Kealedji together. In 1738 about 150
men;? in 1750, 75+;* in 1760, about 350 men;‘ and in 1761 about
130 hunters were credited to these towns and their branches. Taitt
(1772) has 190 gunmen, 120 in Tukabahchee and 70 in Kealedji.° In
1792 Tukabahchee is, curiously enough, omitted; Kealedji is esti-
mated to contain 100 men (p. 436). In Hawkins’s time, 1799, there
were 116 gunmen in Tukabahchee,’ reduced very much shortly before,
he says, by misfortunes in war. He does not give the population of
Kealedji. In 1832 the two towns, including Hachee tcaba, are given
a total population of 2,079 Indians and 183 slaves.®

The census of 1715 gives two Yuchi towns with 130 men and 400
souls,’ but this does not include the Yuchi on Choctawhatchee, the
Westo, or the band on Tennessee River. About 1730 this last was
supposed to count about 150 men.” In 1760 there were 65 men, 15
in an Upper Creek town.'! In 1761 the Yuchi among the Lower
Creeks are credited with 50 hunters,” and to them must be added a
few Choctawhatchee Yuchi enumerated with the Tukabahchee.
Bartram, in 1777, estimated their warriors at 500 and their popula-
tion at from 1,000 to 1,500. In 1792 Marbury reports 300 men,
which would mean a population of over 1,000 (p. 434). By 1799,
when Hawkins wrote, practically all of these had been gathered into
one main settlement, though with outlying villages.'* Young (1822)
gives in one settlement 130 Yuchi.* In 1832 two Yuchi settlements
appear, having a total Indian population of 1,139.° Dr. Speck
states that their number ‘‘can hardly exceed five hundred” at the
present day (1909),!7 but the official enumeration for 1910 was only
a.

1Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong , Ist sess., IV, pp. 241-243, 284-285, 293-296, 297-299.
2Copy of MS., Ayer Coll.
3MS., Ayer Coll.
4 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, p-95.
§ Ga. Col. Rec., vim, p. 523.
6 Travels in Am. Col., pp. 502, 516.
7 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., m1, pp. 29-30.
8 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 243-252, 278-280, 327-330.
9 Rivers, Hist. 8. C., p. 94.
10 Copy of MS. in Lib. Cong.
ll Miss. Prov. Arch., I, pp. 95-96.
12 Ga. Col. Rec., vim, p. 522.
13 Bartram, Travels, p. 386.
14 Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., m1, p. 62.
15 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 364.
16 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 356-363,
17 Speck, Anth. Pub. Univ. of Pa. Mus., I, p. 9.
18 Pop. of Ind. Tribes, 1910, p. 21.

148061°—22 28

434 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

Figures and estimates for the Natchez who settled among the
Creeks have been given in a separate publication.'

In addition, a word may be said regarding those Shawnee who faz
a time constituted part of the confederacy. In 1708 the South
Carolina documents give three Shawnee towns in, that colony and 150
men;? in the census of 1715 three towns with 67 men, and 233 souls.’
In 1760 there were 100 Shawnee men in the bands among the Creeks.*
In 1761 the united Shawnee on Tallapoosa River were estimated to
have 30 hunters,> but Marbury (1792) raises this to 60 (p. 436).
Hawkins does not give any figures, and the name Shawnee does not
occur in the census list of 1832, but we find a town called ‘‘Kiamulga-
town” which appears elsewhere coupled with the Shawnee and may
have been occupied by them. It had a population of 175.°

The following table contains the population of all the above towns
as well as the remaining towns of the confederacy, so far as they are
known, drawn from the Spanish, French, and English trading lists of
1738, 1750, 1760, and 1761, as given by Taitt, Marbury, and Hawkins,
and in the census of 1832.

CoMPARATIVE Town CENSUS

Spanish | French Census | Taitt, Mar- ale U.S
Owe census | census | Census | of 1761%| 1772 bury, 17999 | census
of 1738 | of 1750 | of 17607) (hunt- | (gun- 1792 (gun- of 1832 10
(men). | (men). | (men). ers). men). | (men). men) (souls).
New Tamali-.....2-.. 7 ASA Meare am ote i Sie | aati aia fs ee a a
Owe tamer et eis 132 +80 150 130 220 ZEON eres 896
PFOROR ATTOW occ ot ules oe eo aan ere [ae epee Pee ee GO eae eee cee 438
ents. ese oye 111 +80 150 100 100 375 180 | 1,918
aIChIs Sse aes ee | Cee Ne oreo 50 HOSS sate 300 | 14250] 1,139
Osgehi cs Siena tees 30 50 | tl eae Uy eee eer 539
Chinhia sa osde eee 12190 |} #220 | 160 |} 120 R... 2. (eae ee 427
Okmul veer st seo <8 « +20 30 | 2 DA Re ses | eee
|S AiG ch 9 a ee ee 60 15 50 | 40 | 907 Steen eae eee 381

1 Bull. 43, Bur. Amer. Ethn. I may add that Taitt says there were 30 gunmen, ‘“‘Natches and Creeks,”
in the Natchez town among the Upper Creeks in 1772 (Mereness, Trav. Am. Col., p. 532), and Marbury
places the figure at 110 in 1792 (p. 436).

25. C. Pub. Does., MS., v, pp. 207-209.

3 Rivers, Chap. Early Hist. 8. C., p. 96.

4 Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 96.

5 Ga. Col. Rec., vim, p. 523.

6 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 302-303.

7 Miss. Prov. Arch., 1, pp. 94-96.

8 Ga. Col. Docs., vill, pp. 522-524.

9 Ga. Hist. Soe. Colls., m1, pp. 26-66.

10 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., IV, pp. 239-394. My figures often differ from those given in the docu-
ment because it was found that many errors in compilation had been made.

ll Native estimate.

12 Including 3 towns.

13 ‘Cina.”’

14 With Apalachicola.

cacesteessitieciacinan ideal

1-0 Sy RADE le ew

_ Apalachicola... -.-.-. 60 | +30 60 7 a A LOO ghncs ote 239
Sawokli and villages. . 20} +850 190 ODEs sure sabe |S 5 oe 450
CONES... Soto lwe ae 50 30 50 BOUL Ao shah tc dk oe | Sees
Eufaula, Lower...... lll} +415 60 SO ee pelle a el cence 981
0 TP SOT pe aie a eee ee ee ed Se SO Ae aos elo S224] Sates te
Weupkees (?) (Okiti-

ERE Ss re sya oe mf: SS So) Saas 30 GOs ox ocihe| noe a ected ae eee eS =
Cherokeeleechee. .... BOP e te Ao yaa eats te Se oo Oe A ls che eis ote Se ee
ePACnAUe. - 202... 11) | Leet | Sete Sill |S aan aie aah ee, | A aOR Fei pie
Bd Tamal. ..2..5.2 A, Th 2g cg See oR ee (ene! P ean ee! bee aac
“USES Re ae (aa os STs [See ae es] am (IE et Nel MME fn oe Po gay (eed Ak

Total of Lower
towns. ....... 757 | 398 1,030] 770| 470|1,105| 430| 7,408
25
UE a aes 100 2 200 80 30 200 ble sere 610
| 0 |

Saogahatchee........].....-. Er ee Tg Sees Spe | alee oe Meee 30 240
es age Sg eee (eee at isl Sees Pe pe eect [ono 564
Tukabahchee...-..... 100 | +50 200 390 0 etsace TICs Sel 257,
ITT FI Aa ee Eas, (Magee a RR 1 (i) ey (ese es ee (eee ern ey
Ji eat pS a ede 56 +40 80 50 60 30 5 80 358
Honwahali...- 2.5... 10 15 70 31390 | bearers TAO eS ose 427
Ee ashe oo eae le Mealy. Seinen cys A ora Macon oe fe ceneee aS awa Bee 180
Fus-hatchee.......... 204] -=Fs0ahi "B00? 501... 22 a Bese eee 0
PTLOTINES erat sors cia cree 50 25 50 aU eee SOS: SSe5 EEE eae
TS 1 As 12 15 * 40 SOc setae 30). 5 BASieee are
Pirictanaet eras Soo |= oboe |setias. 50 20M eee BUG Eee al [eas Sern Sates
MeLCIA NOMS o>). / 2's .- 5 - 40 | 40 216
Hatchee teaba...... | ce ee Jat?) (°) | Res Ey | Laie 201
Wiwohka............ 100 | +40 | e100! [> 961]. 2205.8 70| 40] 301
IT Re ES pees Pe ai poeaeuee Se enn a eee ae ae 8 144
Pakan tallahassee. . . . 60 LONE SS sss 45 20 BOP | ees on 288
Pakana (at Fort Tou-

MSC oad fo eet | ate eee 30 50 1) eae el cee a eS |
eeUTCH. oo. 425. 30 | +60 130 50 45 1 i ee See 378

_ 1 With Chiaha. 6 With some Tawasa.

2 With Nafape. : 7 Including some Coosa.
3 Including outsettlements and some Yuchi. § With some Coosa.
4 See above. 98 See Wiwohka.

6 43 in 1766. 10 Including Tcatoksofka and Hatchee tcaba.

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY

CoMPARATIVE TOWN CENSUS—Continued

436
Spanish | French | consus
Nore | RS | Ga | Ge
Kean -teate Ses |e cl rere se eee
Malladesas: Saco ie 851. oh sea Eee hee ee ee
Breed. Camps! 2-2 2 eee Sen es leteieees
Biligkoes 2262 sea see SS 10 40
Ic hiblovkeetat eter. rote 80 20 3 80
Oktahasasi/t2. Set | sere a | Seren
Kitcopataki ss steer fee lea eE see
Sukaispogaso- Wis t350| ase =| sans en ee oe
Okfuskeesl22 25.2 =: 4200 ; +100 300
Okfuskitel. eke sco. 14 10 15
Kealedjiz2 eae 50 | +25 130
COORAE San ae ee 100 +30 20
Eufaula, Upper-..... 20 10 100
Natehezcet= 32 seek see Saleen ae 20
Okchai (2 towns)... -- 200 | +80 130
atovaloas oul ek aa aelee a oe eee sae
TACTILE 01] cy Plamen gems eon [ole Deere baer psi Oa
poteas hatehee i. alsan re cca eee cee pee eeee
\WDIKOMGil a Seausaeaaes 100 +60 100
WWitoe tba 205.25 och es Nee ie eee ee co
Pokpaitkea® Sais silos: ho) ae. =| wee aa
PSC N22y 07270 F: 5 Deena, Ses 9 ea PoP Fe Rea I” Ae
Sawanogi (Shawnee).|.-.-...|...---- 11 100
Kiamuleatown: i8.2. slo ale oie 32 | Sao
Thomapas. 4.2 1¥2-22)25 "easel Psu 2e- 70
Okechaiutersss eases 40 100
DAWASE "22 aes or |e eee 20 10

1 Said to have been broken up soon afterwards.

2 See Asilanabi.

3 With Little Hilibi.

4 Okfuskee old town.

5 With some outvillages.
6 Teatoksofka.

7 In the villages, including Nuyaka.
8 Outvillages, including Kohamutkikatska with a population of 405, Tohtogagi

with 93, Tcutako-nini with 339, and Hitcisihogi with 212.

9 Including Black Creek village.

10 Including Piltako.
11 Two towns.

12 Tawasa.

13 Autauga.

msus | Taitt,
of 1761 1772
(hunt- (gun-
ers). men)
MX) esses
40 100
20 45
5 130 30
40 70
A te | Ee
taet Rese)
125 |S oeerese
60 100
30) We Aste
OV ee eee

[BULL. 73

6493

with 113, Hotitaiga

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE#@CREEK INDIANS 437

CoMPARATIVE TOWN CENSUS—Continued

ike Sa attr (Geta | cers Uae ReMad | tag fe 08
(Gen copay ON ery” | nen). | Gueny, | Om | Cup
men)
2 See ee eet ana
ES TC ils Re ae eee 115 | 1450 a eect 60 SO Men 25a
Ronee Old TOW: 222.2. |2 22.00.22.) - C1 Cacia. se (IAL al Fo
CTCL 2 a ee ea 10 50 3 40 25 25 35 216
(ETT Wid Ee Dy Re eae aaa one gl a5 ees ee GION See cee. 82
Chickasaw (a stray
he aS a ae 50 Ae ot pe Anh ee pa We eke eee
PeIMUINIDED een le SO act on eal ot giga oleae Toes Wee le aes a 5 439
STURT aya ene ad Saeed ened Rs Nl 128
SMR ree IN ee ee ele Wat weal Pon ee eed Sie 2
Emarhetown (or He- |
SUSU SLtl ae A Ciyitig Ce ge te SIE SR AG eee el oe Dh Ee (Dem eae oe 210
Chockolocko [Teahki
LSE EEE soe as “Bape Dh eee apse a, (ea aN (ani tO Seay a 456
MIC UCOSS eae oss OE Pye gel eee as2 52 NES alle oe She ten OOS 298
REE eee eee ee ey gals aN sae (ecg en Peo ace 243
(LS ES SSeS SSE a a eae, (AS eile ee eee een ee ee | eee 147
Lc a A eS prea [ep | ae ec 2p eee (MI ac eS!
OT EUS VIS Peli 3 ee sel ee | eae mead RRR a) (a AU Beane tee tere
2 SOLE) 7G (CS eat Ra [a pera PN ec ae ae (eee PH a ere eC ra
OL AATEDTOL 2 2117s aaa RS Rie pel ee eg ae heer 7A ae ae | eG eee
Total of Upper
towns....... 1,306 | 865 | 2,575 | 1,390 | © 715 | 2,500 |§ 1,111 | 14,325
Lower towns - . 797 398 | 1,030 770 | 7470 | 1,105 | § 430 | 7,408
Grand total.......... 2,063 | 1,263 | 3, 605 | 2,160 |9 1,185 | 3, 605 |91,541 | 21, 738

Jn addition to the town enumerations already given we have
many general estimates of Creek population which, though they
may not in all cases be so accurate, yet tell a more connected story.

In 1702 Iberville places the total number of Creek and Alabama
families at 2,000." In 1708 an early South Carolina estimate gives
600 men among the “‘Ochesee”’ (i. e., the Lower Creeks), in 11 towns,
and 1,300 men among the Upper Creeks, in ‘‘many towns,’ besides

1 Kan-tcati. 74 towns.

2? Witumpka and Red Ground. 82 towns.

3 Including Coosa old town. 917 towns.

4 Including Tamahita. 10 13 towns.

5 13 towns. ll Margry, Déc.,t v, p. 602.

§ 11 towns,

488 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

the people of Chattahoochee town not enumerated.! The census of
1715 gives for the ‘‘Ochesees or Creeks,” 10 towns, 731 men, and
2,406 souls; for the ‘‘Abikaws,”’ 15 towns, 502 men, and 1,773 souls;
and for the ‘‘Talliboosas,”’ 13 towns, 636 men, and 2,343 souls; or in
all 38 towns, 1,869 men, and 6,522 souls.2 This is exclusive of the
Alabama, Yuchi, Shawnee, Apalachicola, and Yamasee. An esti-
mate made in 1739 gives 1,500 warriors for the Creeks,? and one of
1747-48, ‘‘not much over 2,500 men.’”’* Adair says that ‘‘this nation
is generally computed to consist of about 3,500 men fit to bear arms” ;
and adds, on the authority of a ‘“‘gentleman of distinguished char-
acter,’ that they had doubled their numbers ‘‘within the space of
thirty years past,” which would be perhaps from 1720 to 1750 or 1730
to 1760.25 In De Brahm’s “History of the Province of Georgia” the
entire Creek population about 1753 is estimated at 15,000 and the
number of their warriors at 3,000.° De Kerlerec, in 1758, estimated
the Alabama, Tallapoosa, and Abihka Indians at 1,000 warriors, and
the “Kaouitas” (i. e.; Lower Creeks), at 2,000.7. A French manu-
script from the third decade of the eighteenth century seems to give
3,500 men, exclusive of 400 Alabama, although the material is some-
what confused. An estimate dated in the year 1761 gives 2,500
gunmen.’ In 1764 John Stuart places the total number of Creek
gunmen, exclusive of the Natchez, Yuchi, Shawnee, and some Ala-
bama, at 3,600.'° Romans estimates 3,500 gunmen in 1771," and
Bartram, about the same time, a total population of 11,000.% The
latter arrives at his conclusion by allowing 200 persons to each of
the 55 Creek towns known to him.

Swan, 1791, says ‘‘the smallest of their towns have from 20 to 30
houses in them, and some of the largest contain from 150 to 200,
that are tolerably compact’’;'* and further on Gen. M’Gillivray
estimates the number of gunmen to be between 5,000 and 6,000,
exclusive of marauders, acting independent of the general interest
of the others. The ‘useless’? old men and the women and children
were reckoned as three times the number of gunmen, making the
total about 25,000 or 26,000 souls.'* These figures are perhaps a
little high, as the census of 1832, taken just before the removal of
the Creeks to the other side of the Mississippi, yielded a grand total
ot: 21,759. te ae given out by the U.S. Indian Office and

1 Pub. Rec. 8. C, MS.. V, pp. 207-209. £A Descr. of the Prov. of S. C., pp. 60-61.
2 Rivers, Chap. K arly H ist. of 8. C., p. 94. 10Am. Hist. Rev., Xx, 4, p. 825.

3 Ga. Col. Rec., v, p. 191. 1)Romans, E. pil WwW. Fis., p. 91.

4 Pub. Ree. 8. C., MS., xxm, po. 74-75 2 Bartram, Travels, pp. 462-463.

5 Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., pp. 257-259. 13 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, V, p. 262.

6 De Brahm, Hist. Prov. Ga., p. 55. 4 Tbid., p. 263.

7 Compte Rendu, Int. Cong. Am., 1906,1,pp. 88, 84 15 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., Iv,

8 Copy ofMS., Lib. Cong. pp. 334-394.

walt, ah ds 4 enw gee etna ap tapi

j
bres tee

be ee ae ae

Ute ane

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 439

from other sources between this date and 1857 vary between 20,000
and 25,000, but it is probable that the Creek population was actually
shrinking during the period, for a more accurate census taken by
the Indian Office in 1857 gave only 14,888. Since then they have
shrunk slowly, even in the official enumerations, and more rapidly
if we take into consideration the actual amount of Indian blood
which these figures represent. This latter element probably accounts
in a measure for the fact that the U.S. Official Census of 1910 gives
only 6,945 Creeks as against 11,911 in the Report of the U.S. Indian
Office issued the same year.

The difficulty with the foregoing figures is the fact that during
most of this period the population was both receiving accessions from
outside and giving out part of its population in various directions.
Some of the accessions were received so far back that all of our figures
include them. The Apalachicola, Yuchi, Natchez, Yamasee, Oconee,
and Shawnee, however, also some of the Alabama, were taken in after
certain of the estimates and counts had been made. On the other
hand, from comparatively early in the eighteenth century, bands of
Indians began to move into the Florida peninsula, and thither went
also some tribes like the Yamasee and Oconee, which would otherwise
have united with the Creeks permanently. After the Creek war still
greater numbers went to Florida, including several entire towns.

There are no figures on which an accurate estimate of the Indian
population of Florida before the Seminole intrusion may be based.
A document dated 1597 claims more than 1,400 to 1,500 Christian
Indians in the territory attached to Nombre de Dios, San Pedro, the
Fresh Water district, and that of San Antonio.! In 1602 792 Chris-
tian Indians were reported from the ‘‘vicaria of San Pedro,’’ 500 in
that of San Juan del Puerto, and about 200 in the Fresh Water district.
In addition, 100 were under instruction in the province last mentioned
and 1,100 in the province of Icafi. The same manuscript gives a
total population of 700 to 800 in the province of Yui, 1,500 in Timucua
or Utina, and 1,000 in Potano.t’ In 1606 the Bishop of Cuba visited
the Florida missions and confirmed 2,074 Indians.!. In 1608 it is
claimed that 5,000 Indians were converted or being catechised.'. A
letter written February 2, 1635, claims 30,000 Christian Indians were
connected with the 44 missions.'. As the Apalachee field had but
just been opened this includes principally Timucua and Guale
Indians. Itis probably much too high. In 1728 the town of Nombre
De Dios or Chiquito, which seems to have contained most of the
surviving Timucua, had about 15 men and 20 women; eight years

440 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73 ;

From southern Florida we have only the most general statements.
All agree that the most populous tribe by far was the Calusa, and
several say that the Ais were the most numerous of all on the Atlantic
seaboard. But in details there is no approximation to uniformity.
Thus one writer states that there were more than 70 Calusa towns,}
and another ‘‘more than 600,’ not including tributaries.’ In any
case these ‘‘towns”’ were nothing more than small hunting and fishing
camps, the south Florida Indians not having been addicted to agricul-
ture. In another place I have given a list of 56 Calusa towns with
their names.2, An expedition sent into the Calusa country in 1680
passed through five villages said to have a total population of 960.
From about this time on the population would probably show a
steady decline had we the means of registering it.

In 1778 Bartram says of the Seminole:

All of them, I suppose, would not be sufficient to people one of the towns in the
Muscogulge; for instance, the Uches on the main branch of the Apalachucla River,
which alone contains near two thousand inhabitants.*

He probably much exaggerated the number of Yuchi, but there
is reason to believe that his estimate for the Seminole was not far
wrong. Upon the whole, it appears likely that the older Seminole
with whom Bartram had to deal, those living in the peninsula before
the Creek-American war, constituted about one-third of the total
number after the refugees from the Upper Creeks had been incorpo-
rated, and this would make them 1,500 or a little more. The Semi-
nole seem to have been underestimated in most of the reports made
of them. Joseph M. White, secretary to the Commission for Land_
Titles in Florida, and Mr. Pome subagent for Indian affairs, esti-
mated them at Aho 3,000,‘ and figures are given as low as 2,000.
In 1823, however, an actual count was furnished by the Indians
themselves, in which 4,883 were returned, exclusive of Negroes.°
Later, as various bands of Seminole were captured and sent west, the
numbers of the bands are given, and we find a total of about 4,000.
When we allow for those who had been killed or who had died from
other causes, and those who escaped enumeration in one way or
another, the correctness of the Indian figure appears to be indicated.
Another estimate by Mr. Penieres to the effect that there were about
1,200 warriors would agree with this very well. In 1836 the United
States Indian Office reported ay i65 Seminole i in HES west,’ and 1 in

1 Lowery, MSS. Thid,, p. 439.
2 See pp. 331-333. 6 Tbid., p. 411.
8 Bartram, Travels, p. 209. 7 Rept. Comm. Ind. Aff. for 1846, p. 397.

4 Am. State Papers, Ind. Aff., 1, pp. 411, 413-414.

Ls tage
wR er

ie PTE o Le

.
erprae"

- Se be ot heh eee Mein n FCS

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 44]

1837, 5,400.1 Between 1838 and 1843 the figures are a little over 3,500,
and between 1844 and 1856 between 2,500 and 3,000, or a trifle more.
Most of these were based on the preceding enumerations, and when,
in 1857, an actual census was taken only 1,907 were returned.
During the next 15 years the number increased slowly until it reached
about 2,500, and-it has continued to vary between this figure and 3,000
down to the present time. Nevertheless this includes the Seminole
Negroes or freedmen, and in 1905 it was found that they constituted
about one-third of the nation, a proportion they have maintained
ever since. In 1908 an attempt was made to secure separate figures
for the full and mixed bloods, and 1,399 were returned for the for-
mer and 739 for the latter.’ It is probable that this separation was
only relative and that the actual full bloods, could the truth be
known, would be found to number a mere handful. The census of
1910 gives 1,729 Seminole Indians, of whom 1,503 were in Oklahoma
and 226 in Florida.‘ The last number is evidently an underestimate.

Until 1893 no figures were given by the United States Indian Office
for those Seminole who had remained in Florida. MacCaulay,
however, attempted an exact enumeration of them in 1880 and
found 208 individuals.’ In 1893 the Indian Office reported, or rather
estimated, 450,° and the same figure was repeated in 1894.7 In the
report of 1895 we find 565 entered and the same number in 1896 and
1897.8 In 1898, 1899, and 1900 the number given is 575.° In 1902
it is reduced to 358" and so appears until 1911, when it jumps to
446." In 1912 thisis repeated, but in 1913 itis increased to 600,” and
in 1914 reduced to 562.% There is known to be a considerable admix-
ture of Negro blood in the band, but the amount of white blood is
practically negligible. No separate enumeration of mixed bloods has
been made.

The following tables contain the earlier estimates of Creek and
Seminole population in a more compact form and all of the impor-
tant censuses taken of them in later times.

1 Rept. Comm. Ind. Aff. for 1847, p. 592, includ- 7 Ibid. for 1894, p. 570.

ing Apalachicola Indians. 8 Ibid. for 1895, p. 566; 1896, p. 532; 1897, p. 484.
2 Ibid. for 1847, p. 229. 9 Ibid. for 1898, p. 600; 1899, p. 564; 1900, p. 640.
3 Tbid. for 1908, p. 185. 10 Tbid. for 1902, p. 632.
4 Ind. Pop., Census 1910, p. 20. 1 Thid. for 1911, p. 59.

5 Fifth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 476-480. 12 Tbid. for 1912, p. 136; 1913, p. 50.
6 Rept. Comm. Ind Aff. for 1893, p. 696. 13 Tbid. for 1914, p. 78.

: : < pe
4492 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 73

~~
CREEK AND SEMINOLE POPULATION AT VARIOUS PERIODS Prior TO 18341

(The figures are for the Creeks unless otherwise specified.]

Authority. Year. Warriors. ae 1a pu:
Thervallens 2 sgccS2s2 5 Alea ee 1702 3 2,000 7, 000
South Caroling recorde) sys. G22 1 eee ee 1708 3 2,000 7, 000
DO EER Se See Sts Po Ay SRE er Ye eee 1715 32,083 7, 292
Bienvilles scar nh see Aes wie 1725-26 2, 200 7. 700
Spanish manuseript ys 2st ee eee 1738 42, 063 7, 220
Georgia records#6 (At See ee eee 1739 — "2 5500 5, 250
South Carolina records.............------ hee 1747-48 +2, 500 8, 750
Adair O20 SECA A es aks ae meet T95e 1750(?) 3, 500 12, 250
An anonymous French estimate. .......------ | 1750(?) 87258 4, 403
Besbrahmis * 5 geyeties 13S tes sigs oe hie er 1753. 3,000 | 7 10,500
De -Merletec): tisd ten. LE Ree tee Sea 1758 3, 000 10, 500
Prench; Census: . cei. Sale eee ee 1760 3, 655 12, 792
Anonymous description of South Carolina....| 1761 2, 500 8, 750
Georgia Colonial Documents. ...........--.--- | 1761 8 2, 160 7, 560
Johme Stuart 195 Ai ee i hee ee eee 1764 3, 600 12, 600
Gol? Henry: Bouquets. 2 .cisesee EEO. SA | 1764 9 2, 950 10, 325
HlamiPottere just halen Smee ae Ee ee 1768 1, 600 5, 600
Bioniania: }, ss hee see ec a eae eae ag 3, 500 12,250 ~—
Bartrame: ax. sce ee see ears ee | Sil, 182s as ceases eee 11, 000
PREECE HL. EN chs ethers ee eR pb: Sls Seach 1780 10 5, 860 17, 280
Mirae 3 tsb. a Sein ofa se 2. 32 ree ee ~ 1786 5, 860 17, 280
| 14,000 .
Hy Knox .Sectetarywot Wat:a2 a. tech: ase | 1789 | 4, 000-6, 000 to
| | 21, 000

1 Authorities: Iberville in Margry, Déc., rv, pp. 601-602; S.C. Pub. Rec., MS., v, pp. 207-209; Rivers,
A Chapter in the Early Histroy of South Carolina, p. 94; Copy of Spanish MS. in Ayer Coll.; Ga. Col. Rec.,
V, p. 191; S.C. Public Records, MS., xxii, p. 75; Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 257; Anonymous French
Memoir, MS., Ayer Coll.; De Brahm, History of the Province of Georgia, p. 55; DeKerlerec in Compte
Rendu, Int. Cong. Americanists, 1906, I, pp. 83-84; French Census in Miss. Prov. Arch.,1, pp. 94-97; A
Description of S. C., pp. 60-61; Ga. Col. Rec., vil, pp. 522-524; Bouquet in Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, m1, p.
559; Am. Hist. Rev., xx, 4, p. 825; Potterin Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., lst ser., X, p. 121; Romans, A Concise
Nat. Hist. of E. and W. Florida, p. 91; Bartram, Travels, pp. 462-463; Purcell in Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls.,
Ist ser., IV, p. 99; Morse in Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 146; Knox in American State Papers, Ind. Aff.,1, p.
60; Swan in Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, v, p. 263; Sehermerhorn in Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., 2d ser., 11, p. 20;
Penieres in Am. State Papers, Ind. Aff., 1, pp. 411-413; Am. State Papers, 1, p. 439; Schoolcraft, Ind.
Tribes, 1, p. 584; U. S. Censusin Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, tv, p. 578; MSS., Lib. Cong.

2 Obtained, where number of warriors is given, by multiplying by 3}.

3 Exclusive of Yamasee, Apalachicola, Shawnee, and Yuchi, but including Alabama. The last was an
actual census.

4 Excludes Alabama and neighboring towns.

5 From this time on the Apalachicola, some Shawnee, a few Yamasee, and nearly all of the Yuchi are
included.

6 Evidently incomplete.

7 Given as 15,000.

8 From about this time the nation lost many to Florida.

» With 600 Alabama.

10 Creeks and Seminole.

SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 443

CREEK AND SEMINOLE POPULATION AT VARIOUS PERIODS PRIOR TO 1834—Con.

Total popu-

Authority. Year. Warriors. ition
ar 117, 500
TREN ad se in Sa ae re eee 1791 5, 000-6, 000 to
{1 21, 000
23 605 12, 618
TTL AUR, Sa ane ere a ce IS Se Se 1792
1, 399 4, 882
PERC ROOI 22 eR 2a 5. te eS Sn Sent = sae 1814 5, 000 317, 750
Andrew Jackson..........- ise Pe ap a ee 1821 2 1, 200 2 3, 000
Lo eg Oe eee ae Selast 1A Nalgene RS 22000
OE ES Gage SER Hele chl rh giant ye ea 2 MM ESE nt aes 245 000.
NN Ne eet) Nett 3 12h oc hs cee 23,000
Report to American Commissioners. .......-.- - PROS) ehitesceseose ss a 4 4, 883
20, 00)
MERIT Geto an ts ot oe to 5 6 Sot Dons 12h pole ee aie aaa :
* 5, 000
20, 000
BUAETNAN Saree le ic aie TSE CGS ec Bin tng See TBZOS. LAS hearae shes ,
> 4000
POO States OONsUS. i S22 se ese 55 522255 22: SCE tal, | eae earl cao 25 759
CREEK AND SEMINOLE PoPULATION SUBSEQUENT TO 1834
United States Indian Office: Total population.
UA TESS VS See SS pe ge a - enRe ry EE 22, 000
yo ALS Shes ee Oe a a ae me aie OST Tee sad 22, 000
MIR I Se aia Soest eee cl aioe fy oasis - odes Ss > wie SEES 3, 765
aa PE RRR Beet ei are MIO es Fase Ao A Ne Scie in ie = ob ee ea ME en 21, 437
Speen ISM Pe ee Se ne Be Be Os Ss ee ye we oe ara be 5, 072
Mites SOT CORN SEN Re ae wn Seapets Boi 5, 5 Bees! oer cyo ald <!Sc e wie Se wo Set tye Be 25, 293
ST ELETTREC (=) SOS ARES RS Or RS A ra ea nl ea eias tea 3, 565
LUiov = OF ESN Eas ia Sie an eh Rae ee Te eT, Te 25, 338
SELLE TGR bo A Bae Fe ee nee Re EE a PY 3, 765
Stee etme es Ser eee nae hr re ee Ames oe ne res 25, 338
Seminole (in west; and so with following figures)...........--..-- BAOLZ
eee ROME oe 8 8 arnt sa ian Ree ae yeh ae SUS Be eae tote 25, 338
RISEHEHON OGG 23.52.50 2 ox wee ge on cee ee eee ne oa tn 3, 824
ieee RRM Me care So) s tices Soawec ene Deb eg ee ctee fe- teak ieee tose seas 25, 338
PETES ns 2 oe, ae CEN Re Pee ac sem eee oh eae e- 3, 136
ER Rig oe SOL SAIS A ee acs ral dings t0v whe cere eralyso nic oie nm 24, 754
STEEL De aS Seem Cer, aia See aR a he ge Oe 3, 136
Schoolcraft:
Se NET Cae a Soe SOR ees SG St stot Ste eyes Fon oe Meets 2 3, 250
eet —Oreeks.: = Pee et eee: Oe Feet e age hens seg oe hoe che S eee es 25, 000
PMO re Ph ret ee eS mc Bape go bas se we as tee 2's ak Nie S 1, 500
eer alG THOM LOM ood coe Sx S's toe cep ae vias 2 Ses se DS xcs 370
re er IOUe TD OPE. 02. SS ses aoe gS wc ee Seen 2 2 348
pee 1 Given as 25,000 to 26,000. 5 Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, 11, p. 621.
2 Seminole. 6 Ibid., 1, pp. 6-24.
3 Given as 20,000. 7 Tbid., 1, p. 522.

4 Seminole, exclusive of Negroes.

444 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY

United States Indian Office:

[BULL. 73

Total population.

1851—Seminole.2. : 2650 Lato oes oe eo re ee ae 2, 500
WSH3——Creeks? ois. = 2h, vs Sapo a wise ake ee eaence he = age aye ere eae 25, 000
Seminole (including 500i Hlorida)-. 22. svcc sce 4 dees see oe ee 3, 000
1855—(Same).
Schoolcraft:
1855—Semiinol ez) os.5 bt i SEE SAR © See oa Re ree 2, 500
1857—=_Seminoleze e202) cnate olor ores ce, Soe eee ae ee tL ce ee 2, 500
United States Indian Office (new census):
1857——Creeleae oT ie Be dec cere ware 6 Shs ere ae ea Te Be ee 14, 888
Seminole: sof. io son) a castes sar ek eee Seka eee 1, 907
Schoolcraft: f
NS — CREE Ics 33 a oo ane Maes ec cre mrareive ee eon e eats Sn ee ee eee 28, 214
Seminoles. sa. sos ek up eee sees Sea peaks Sey See Ne ae 1, 870
United States Indian Office:
1858—Seminole:2 S25 $Y Sssehse seccces seat Das ee ee Oe ee ee 2, 060
BHO Cree keisha ce Sa Ee re ei sen RS een 13, 550
Seminole}: 32. 5) 5. agus 5205 63S: | 1 de eee eee 2, 253
ISG I—Cresles: Sou 25 ashes noctac eek Sees Shee eee ee a eee 13, 550
Semimole 25.23 s/o, ee eee a eS ee 226i
186566 Creeks! a2 ceiSe co ara sce wichow se kile He Mois See oie See SP ere 14, 396
Seminole sinisy <2)? Sais SMe es eas bi ond che Sc hte 2, 000
NBG 1 = Creeks s/s. ai sit ae eo Bee itee iw sci ce Sere eee Sen Ee ere 12, 294
Seminole o2.ab. sek is ise a seritt aoa. Sec Eee ae ee eae ee 2, 236
S68-—Creekie cs won odes Soe site ees ag eee i sae eee eee 12, 003
Seminole. 2as5% teen tse de oan Vee eee os oe eee 1, 950
NS69— Creeks: eo ock oe Ses acto be vate ee ee nica iateveleisie sisal a eeate eats alae ame 12, 294
Seminole oct sac. Qolanct a oe ce eee Bene ee eee ee eee 2, 136
MS 70 Creeksy-utnecele ac sie so Seca ciogos ois ieee eke Sipe ae ns eee 12, 294
Seminole a-2222 84 cine ah.oz.c eee ne cate eerie ee a Bet 2, 136
US 71—“Greeks:. on ate tetas Secreta e sees ses aoe ae oe ero eee 13, 000
Seminoles saic: 2 cows Shs Suess so Seon aes 2s oe coe eee 2, 300
US 72=Creeks 7224 soya cca cine aie ee iste le ae HO SSE coe Boe te eS 13, 000
Seminolerssice ats ces tes nae ets een cot os ete eee eee 2, 398
WS873=—-Creekss. 585 55 ae be eee ee eS eh ar ae Sie ee ee oe 13, 000
Seminoles] cakes 22 Se ae eee res oe oe oe a ee 2, 438
1874—Creeks (including 2,000 freedmen)................-.--- tod aaRe 13, 000
Seminole: SusGes sao sho eee et be Sas cee Se eee eee eae 2, 438
1875—(Same).
1876—Creeks (including 3,000 mixed bloods)......-.------------------ 14, 000
Seminole (100 mixed: bloods): 225). Q22 22 secre. oe eee 2, 553
1877—Creeks (1 ,200.mixed bloods) 222.2. /. gesoecise 42 eee eee 14, 000
Seminole (200 iixed bloeds))2))o...0 24 ess S a eee eee eee 2, 443
1878—(Same). ;
1879 —Greekas 2 se. ca02 oataee soon oe One See oe eee 14, 500
Seminole: 22255) ce See oS nea ES nee eee eee 2, 560
1S80=Crecks:-. 2202 So. hee eee Set ee ee eee eee *.... 15,000
Seminole... 3... <nd.scci econ ene Seles hie wideee eee EEE eee eee 2, 667
WSS Creekeh c ocsicie cic c ots Ss oes a sislererei See alnle ce eee Se reer 15, 000
Semimolese ae. ch... no soc s cashic ce oo stine ope a eee eee 2, 667
1BSI=—Oveeks eres Sire Soe eee ew ege eae ee Sores Or eT eee 15, 000
Seminole: Ss 5 sete tc = ic yse -i5 eo ae Soe a ee eee 2, 700
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas............:..----..- 290

1 from here on the Seminole removed to the west are meant unless otherwise specified.

RAD eat an a A eS invert

Se DNs Sees.

\
SWANTON ] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 445
_ United States Indian Office—Continued. Total population.
viele cae tt 1 Ne RE aS pes RTS i ae en od Roe eee ee 14, 000
Pi HURONG Sa mes ee ee eee Mime ail 1S AN Beads. obec a Se 3, 000
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas..................---- 290
1884—(Same).
\ Se NEE nt aa ee eee Pa eee mtn el. EA heehee. 14, 000
PIOHAMIDD, Satis ene eee Gere on te al tae bee lee 3, 000
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas.................2.--- 290
1886—(Same).
1887—(Same).
Ds eR eh eee oe En aS ac B it. ana cline oid Seo s 14, 200
Pa accede nis ics SE a we Clee ON eee SS 3, 050
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas................2----2- 290
See RH ts, Oe Sen ask ook AL ck oa De Vee ee 14, 200
PATOL oP tee CMa ae Sian On So Sta st hn Noes Oda ee 2, 600
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas...............-..---- 290
ee ORR co eg attire eee eee LL Suc Ce eh Saleh eo 15, 000
RPISREUINI ose oN eat Sele each e bats er eh ye let 6 le 2, 600
; Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas...................--. 290
4 CI MCS Ss 2 Saas Me, racer ne wie Se eae os Sete ees 15, 000
¥ ERHEMOLO cetera He me icee a 3 aeRO eee ees) (oe ek 2, 600
at Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas..................-.-- 290
‘a Le EISve es aR, roe ae A ae ea Pile rah RLS Oe ee 15, 000
td GMI LOS sep os 55 tae acre Se Ie Sle am Sones See ee aly og Aes 3, 000
+ Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas.........5.........--- 290
- 1893—(Same and).
3 Siriaas, PETMMINOLG. coon cS- =. RSIS THe Ais Le Pt f Moeeoe 450
; 1894—(Same and).
2 lees SOLMINOLE Ce 38 a3 cee. dete. 8 3 Re Ae oe 450
& oes rece. mill blood. Indians... ...0- fae. on Boo fee ok 9, 447
& Spree OCORIO Resa s std os es. SOI RO eds > 4,416
P DSi Gaes Goes aes Pose Sots as SE 2 = Sed os CO ee 2, 900
4 leedel es SODUIIOLG ae ee tg ew ae te ed: 5 Pir oy ee a 565
4 Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas..................------ 290
: VE SE C7221 fae Rape Sl ae A eR Pe 13, 863
z BIE OUS GS ee SoS aS Sia ROh Mec ste oe Se ok PERL Mh RD Sa 2, 000
> BiGnittans SPAMB ONO. oso oats ten eee ace ae Nene OE ace 565
4 Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas..............4......- 290
5 rie MOO ier Se. 25. tS. oe MN ea ok ee ete PSS 13, 863
2 SCLIN © SNS AE Ae Neer Spiro toy Are ae Ww OTS een ee 2, 900
> Hlpids PeMmINOle 4 5. Fac usese coe ye pe ca eC MMe see eee 5. os 565
4 2 Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas...................... 290 ©
Ms Dee teee sy DOOM gon tao tock oa sls Sen eee Uh OL 2 10, 014
- MrecrMeee Mens = cosas Soke ee. ee 5s Seek erotik eee eh 4,757
- BREIL Src Oe She oe Rei he 2's ie ELE AEE CEL SEM 2, 900
Hi “4 Migs eS ORMOlG = 2. 22a5 Sos hice Geka Ho I Re os 575
o Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas.....................- 290
> SE ig Nhe Se an a eae we nae, Weir tee 14, 771
t ca MmINNNE ey Reena hn see Esa eS aL ML AES. RAS TS 2, 900
t Riiptey erin 6.2% & Steere tao ot ee ewes te ee oS 575
# Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas...................+-2-- 290
> Mee Packt Wlogde pcm etc SS a 10, 000
Le ELETAN SEG I G18 SS ERR a ong le a ee 6, 000
Seminole. ........ | itp REE Eee Bee SE Re A ES ee 3, 000

- saeeealinl

|
446 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73 :
United States Indian Office—Continued. Total population. i
1900—Seminole freedmen...........------ Se eet ee eR Ee 575 3
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas...............-.------- 290 2
1901—Creeks by: blood 22 4s2sc2r 2 se a ae ae ae ee eer eee 10, 000 z
Creek freedmen’ 2 sja~ anc smo poise an aie ae 5, 000
Seminoles. .'.3S42 awesene Sits eaeeees oe aoe eee ee eee 2, 157 4
Florida Semingleae. 2 ss. cen era oe eee eee 358
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas........--...-....-.-- 470 3
1902-——Crepicds cs ou. sco oe eae ee Ego eran ts Da ad ae oe 15,000 am
Seminole. 225.950. 5.55 a: Sa. 5 eet ee See 2, 50a ‘
Higrida Seminole ss... 23's 5 ee es ee ee 358
Alabama, .Koasati,. and Muskogee. 222 2-4. -S25- ue eee 470
1903-—Creéeks: by ‘blood 2: .. 202222 Meee ee Bes ee eee ae es eee 9, 624
Creek ireedimen - 2-'. 2 sass ae onesie eke ee 4, 954
Seniinoles 22% 2.22. Gg ccuic vote sea See ee a 2, 750
Florida. Seminole.(-.. i225. 22 tuscan See ee ee 358 -
Alabama, Koasatiyand Muskegeéis-:.2-s--4- 5-2-4002 -s22 sees 470
1904—Creeks by. blood. 2. 2.22224 2 hic aetna Be Se alen eee eee 9, 905
Creelkireedmen:. 240205. 5a. ca einiien SE Tien eee ee ee 5,473
Florida: Seminoles. 2 22.22. oe ee eee es ee 358
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee: .2.2.2.- 2.42556. b= soe 470
1905—Creeks: by, bloodie 24 a20 ee een eae se = teil a 10, 185
Creek freedmien'.-" =. 222. 10 asc cme ncaae vena: eee 5, 738
Semunolevbysblood!s 2: 320 sc esesee = <nle yee ainge es ee eer 2,099
Seminoleireedimen. oda 5. -2 ees teish. siee teeske eee 950
Florida: Seminole 2.20! Sse c ee Ss ae eo ens a ee ore 358
Alabama,’ Koasati, and Muskogee=*..2: 2252. 025 <cseseen es eeee ee 470
1906—Créeekatby blood 2. 5.2. Nec 2 se we oe se eo eee ee 11, 081 >
Creek ireedmene.—s 2. S. 2sae see Sec 2: oe eee 6, 265 ¥
Seminole-by bloodis.2.2.2 522 aot oe eee 2, 132 ;
Seminolé-tréedimen)\.- 5222). ao3 ss as se pee Eee 979
Mloriday Seminole... 232 25-44 nee tgs 2 Sos «+ ee See 358
Alabama, Koasati, and = MuskogeeSa4-—-2ce--4- 2 eee seo eee eee 470
1907—Creeks: by blood 2.2925 2se este eo oe See eee eee 11, 895 é
Creek treed Meter 2 Seine aden ae area tee ae eee 6, 807 ;
Seminele-by bloods psec antec one Saree eee hogan 2, 138 5
Seminole freedimen"=.. 5.28225. eso 25 cae oe oe ee eee 986 “
Plorida Seminoles;.*h-cecc 322 See eee stein ere 358 ¢
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee:::: °222-<2 2: <.-< 252222 aaeee eee 470 i
1908—€reek full bloods. >= > a252 0-30 -<j2 ss ates = ee 6, 812
Creek mixed: bloodst/.2 7). 25 232 orc cee, eee ee ee 5, 083
Creek freedmen.....-......---- Yin Seni de Von seein aS eae ate 6, 807
Seminole full bloodss 2% 2-257 222... Se eee 1, 399
Seminolesmixed"bloodsster. eas ss es ioe eee eee 739
Seminole freedimeni eos. hose esetr- oe ne oes Ae ee eee 986
Florida Seminole. 2. .225: 2.s3e see oe eee ee ee 358
Alabama, Koasati, and’ Muskogee: 3.222222 204. sass ere ees 420
1909—Oreek fill bloods: 2... <2 Ret oo sca- ao se eee ee = eee 6, 816
Creek mixed bloods... 2.2: 222 20k eee oe ee 5, 091
Creektirecdintiens 2.0.3. J. 2. ae aa yee ee 6, 807
Seminole tullebloodshes5-- --2 eee eee ioe eietacet eee eee 1, 399

Seminole:mixedsbltoods: 3.5 sc c's Sate seine seateletisielte Seer 739

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 447
United States Indian Office—Continued. Total population.
r MNT oi ie af BP OO igre yn Sida, Ring dim meson Sn 986
Peete MRS ETORTIOUO «ie door oe Sains «oo digit oe aiwie Sm ole oe 358
Pisbpanas, Kossati, and: Muskopee-. 2.22. ..- 2. 5/6 ct aaencincceee 470
LSS SG: eee ie a a er a 11, 911
or) Pit peo Se, i a a ae ane ane - 6,806
PION OY NG as eae seg. ee See os. ds Sewage einiaemreie be a= ral ig
rm IICOUMIOH eee! sen eh eS. oe een ice: 986
Lo Ce Pa SES Tena | Cs Sa re 358
Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee.................2-.....-5------ 470
Census of 1910—
Creeks (full bloods?)....-.. Gisatar ss eee pe AS a ge oe Bs 6, 945
BLEU IL MMOOME T2522) 2o os. soe nee Sha aaci\eaivie’s Seas 1, 729
UAT SARE BONE nn ke SE Io wate art tater 8 Ora Auk ot ke 298
Aa GHGs <2 eee Peer 18M 3 Sp cig aki Acme wos oe a0 wha aoe wees ore 98
United States Indian Office:
I Ae CERI ADC Mcts haa ora arm aan i as nw ermal tens Sate ee pave FS a 11,919
ac Ritoe aC re yess Mer ieicieion bios < tla nint seo sige cranes 2 6, 806
SESSA SOS gh 0) [000 (NR em gah le a a 2,137
“LT CHIT SR ge 2 C 0: 22) a en ee nn 986
ER URE RESPEC ise Paice Ls oo ames Sine st 5 cwieare meme Ses 446
BaP UTIL ITN SMES eM rd hte Sn igo a Sercie a Sic ae oe Save eS 192
See ECM PML oe So cae one nk Soke ee oe oe ooh oe Sew co a See 11,911
Mrermircoumion se s72 sen sete US AMS SS Ce yes 6, 806
/ Sepa Kind DDO Meee BEN. BOT) eds See eb Recs Shes 2187
Soimniaie Ireeanien ser. = 214 ote. es ies a ae ac bela ete am Sees 986
RCMP RES CKOIN OG cS ao wret os a. hot Saray ethno d cia ae Se ae 446
PRIMER UMS DOR ASN ae oe oo ae 2G 250: 2 ot Ne Sr den Se wre ow a te etee 192
i913—Creeks by blood--.....-.. 2... - Sige Boe oe ee eee psp ys | Heo
REECE AR OGUIHG HCE sity Peaeh wert ae otha Ros oe eee Pak a, 6, 807
Bemsolerhyt bloods: 181 ates eits tt 32 ae ea Ee ete & 2,183
BieaIREROM CE OCI CH ase rn ae ahs tN otis Sa we mosh Lea Wade dee 986
RY SENMEMOL SO I Oo ee oe Ae ee ok keane te ee 600
Poh Ly SEER WT LSS AT ance ed eB NR ol Le ea 192
Ree ECP WY GO cS een e en tn eos oon ole eee ste s- Sos 11, 905
Creek freedmen. ..- =... ..... Sa Fay See habe nase te 6, 807
Seminole by blood...............-.-- Ses RS ety ae eee pears Pete 2, 133
Seminole freedmen...............-.-- PAD Ar for epee Ot be ALONE 986
PPMIEWEBNRSCRDEUOL Os <2: Ys fs Be fos ro ce eee ca Sas ee one oe 562
PURSUIT RA TSHR Oe Fhe ns ae ee nee tat een ee 192
1915—Creeks by blood (full blood, 6,873; half blood or more, 1,698; less
RHABUEUE DOOM, SOU) 2, sh ese aes oe eee Se LIS 11, 967
Picrmanr Omen. / 2.00 he emcees oe? oe Shot tot Tacs 6, 809
Seminole by blood (full, 1,254; one-half or more, 478; less than
SE PL hv 21 ses ete ta palin mig tie So, Se ee a PS a Sn 2,141
PCMAG OTC Se rast ete Etre oe aw Ha ne ee tye ee eee 986
Sitrbeve! Ute iy 2) ee: ba ae oe bale aed Ry eee be an Oa a 578
fod ESS pie Wis 22 nad JOP ape Sea a apa ae Re Os A eR 192
meaiG—Creans by blood. °.2is2.-2.-.5.2.22.-22520 Sete lactate ans eee ees 11, 965
opie STAT Daa! iets eal tee Neaciee SSR ARR peat a hie 6, 809

448 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73
’ United States Indian Office—Continued. Total population,
1916—Seminolétreedmen: 22 5. 2a) hes cae cen ceo ee ee ee 986
Florida; Seminole! 25222 seseed Set ates et oe eee Ce eee 574
Alabamarin’exas) s28. 2 oor ec owecs see ce a eee ane eee ee 192
1917—Creeks by blood ca! << Usteue eee ves ee See ee 11, 952
Greek dreedMen™ S: ef $225 2a 22552 ae ewe ee ee ee 6, 809
Seminole ‘by blood!to 2.3.52 5. ea. Sse! see ae es seca eee 2, 141
Seminoletreedimen’- 2s hc se Soot oo eee re ee ee eee 986
MlondasSemimnole:. 285.2. 26% te sate ose = eee eee eee 586
Alabama: Iny Texas o8. f See ee eeeee oe Se ee tee na eee 192
LOLS Creeks Wy blood 5. pecan non arin cicnecae eli ie os etal 11, 952
Creek-freedmion : 5h.2 2c apiece al eo ssthte oe ee eee 6, 809
Seminole biy blood > occ. ...4. 2 bs de deceees Soe eee ee eee 2,141
Seminoletireedimens 5 oo she jas ecco ee eee eee 986
Blorida: Seminoles. sesso eee cok ye ee ee 585
iMlabamainwRexds: 22558 2055. .6..s acest eae a eee ee 192
1919—Creeks and Seminole. si2si 2st Fs. ee ann siee oe oe ae (same as in 1918)

BloridaiSeminolet secs oes. aigsenno etc oe ore et eee ee ioe
Alabama and Koasati in Polk County, Texas..-...-....--........ 206

To the figures since 1910 must be added about 100 for the
Koasati and 100 for the Alabama Indians in Louisiana.

The earlier figures for the Chickasaw are so discordant that not
much satisfaction can be obtained from them. Particularly it is hard
to reconcile them with the size of the later figures. Either we must
suppose that the earlier figures are too low or that there was a con-
siderable increase in population during the latter part of the eight-
eenth century and the first part of the nmeteenth. For about 20 years
after their removal west of the Mississippi the Chickasaw and Choc-
taw were much mingled together, and some addition to the population
may have come from the latter tribe. The slaves were also reckoned
in and later as freedmen account for much of the increase shown, but
they do not account for all of it in the period under consideration.
Early in the eighteenth century we hear that the tribe had lost so
heavily in its wars with the French and their Indian allies that it had
become ‘“‘reduced to 200-300 warriors,’’ which would indicate a
population of not much over 1,000 at the outside,' yet Morse’s Report
shows what appears to have been an exact enumeration of 3,625 in
1821;? and 15 years later the United States Indian Office estimates
5,400. For the period from about 1800 to 1840 I think we must
assume an actual increase, but it is probable that the earlier estimates
of population were sometimes too low, and I venture to place the
population in 1700 at from 3,000 to 3,500.

18.C. Pub, Rec., XXII, p. 75. 3 Rept. Comm. Ind. Aff. for 1836, p. 402.
2 Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War, p. 364.

Wes

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 449

CHICKASAW POPULATION AT VARIOUS PERIODS PRIOR TO 1834!

1699. M. de Montigny, 350 cabins.

1702. Iberville, 2,000 families.

1704. De La Vente, ‘‘as numerous as the Choctaw,’’ i. e., 700 to 800 cabins.
1708. South Carolina documents, at least 600 warriors.

1715. South Carolina census, 6 villages, 700 men, 1,900 population.
1722-23. Bienville, 6-7 villages, 800 men.

1739. Georgia records, 500 warriors.

1747. South Carolina public documents, reduced to 200 to 300 warriors.
1750. Adair, barely 450 warriors.

1750. An anonymous French memoir, 560 warriors.

1764. Capt. Thos. Hutchins, 750 warriors.

1764. Col. Bouquet, 750 warriors.

1764. John Stuart, 500 gunmen.

1768. Rev. Elam Potter, estimated at 300 to 400 warriors.

1771. Romans, 250 warriors.

1780. Purcell, 575 warriors, 2,290 population.

1814. Schermerhorn, 1,000 warriors, 35,000 population.

1817. Morse, 3,625 population.

1829. Gen. Peter B. Porter, 3,600.

1833. Report in Schoolcraft, 4,715.

CHICKASAW POPULATION SUBSEQUENT TO 1834

1836. United States Indian Office, 5,400.

1838. United States Indian Office, 4,176 (in west).
1839. United States Indian Office, 5,000.

1841. United States Indian Office, 5,000.

1842. United States Indian Office, 5,010.

1843. United States Indian Office, 5,010.

1844. United States Indian Office, 4,130.

1845. United States Indian Office, 4,211.

1847. United States Indian Office (in Schoolcraft), 1,166 families, 4,260.
1847. Another entry in Schoolcraft, 6,500.

1853. United States Indian Office, 4,709.

1855. United States Indian Office, 4,787.

1861. United States Indian Office, 5,000.
1865-1870. United States Indian Office, 4,500.
1871. United States Indian Office, 5,000. =f
1872-1875. United States Indian Office, 6,000.
1876. United States Indian Office, 5,800.
1877-1878. United States Indian Office, 5,600.
1879. United States Indian Office, 7,000.
1880-1889. United States Indian Office, 6,000.
1890-1891. United States Indian Office, 6,400.

1 Authorities: Compte Rendu, Int. Cong. Am., 15th sess., 1, p. 35; Iberville in Margry, Déc., Iv, pp.
601-602; S. C. Pub. Rec., MS., v, pp. 207-209; Rivers, A Chapter in the Early Hist. of S. Car., p. 94; Ga. Col.
Rec., v, p. 191; S. C. Pub. Rec., xxm, p. 75, MS.; Adair, Hist. Am. Inds., p. 353; Hutchins in Schoolcraft,
Ind. Tribes, m, p. 555; Bouquet, ibid., p. 559; Potter in Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., Ist ser., X, p. 121; Am. Hist.
Rev., XX, 4, p. 825; Romans, Concise Nat. Hist. of E. and W. Fla., p. 69; Purcell in Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls.,
1st ser., Iv, p. 100; Schermerhorn in Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., 2d ser., U, p. 16; Morse, Rept. to Sec. of War,
p. 364; Porter in Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, m1, p. 597; Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes (1833); Reports U.S. Indian
Office; Ind. Pop.in U.S., U.S. Census of 1910, p. 15; MS., Lib. Cong

148061°—2 29

450°» BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

1892. United States Indian Office, 6,800.

1893-1897. United States Indian Office, 6,000.

1898. United States Indian Office, 8,730.

1899. United States Indian Office, 9,048.

1900. United States Indian Office, 10,500.

1901. United States Indian Office, 6,000 Indians, 3,500 freedmen.

1902. United States Indian Office, 11,500.

1903. United States Indian Office, 4,659 by blood, 198 by intermarriage, 4,211
freedmen.

1904. United States Indian Office, 4,826 by blood, 348 intermarried, 4,471 freedmen.

1905. United States Indian Office, 5,474 by blood, 598 intermarried, 4,695 freedmen.

1906. United States Indian Office, 5,558 by blood, 623 intermarried, 4,730 freedmen.

1907. United States Indian Office, 5,684 by blood, 635 intermarried, 4,670 freedmen.

1908. United States Indian Office, 1,538 full bloods, 4,146 mixed bloods, 635 inter-

married, 4,670 freedmen.

1909. United States Indian Office, 1,550 full bloods, 4,185 mixed bloods, 647 inter- —

married, 4,673 freedmen.

1910. United States Census, 4,204.

1910-1912. United States Indian Office, 5,688 by blood, 645 intermarried, 4,651 freed-
men.

1913. United States Indian Office, 5,674 by blood, 645 by intermarriage, 4,670
freedmen.

1914. United States Indian Office, 10,955 total population.

1915. United States Indian Office, 1,515 full bloods, 966 one-half or more, 3,823 less
than half (including 645 by intermarriage), 4,662 freedmen.

1916-1919. United States Indian Office, 5,659 by blood, 645 intermarried, 4,652
freedmen.

The only attempt to give the Chickasaw population by towns, so
far as | am aware, is contained in an anonymous French memoir of
about 1750,’ from which I quote the following:

Men
AV AINAQ MIAN 2 ce ee ee a eS Sie So Debnam eee ee 40
Falatché....-:.: Dee ae Se, ee ene A ee tS ae 50
Gotlat Chitou's-s..55: oe So as hese eka ae eaten ae ae 60
Acquimar e225, O52 PPE Ss es Saar ec ee 40
Conéquatdlass.. ss 5< p5stence es Se ne te ee ae eee 50
Outanquatles <2.5.Ry Sas ees ee re 30
Achonqueouma, s.4. eet. sto ss Sade See oe ee Bee 30
Cotirdloussast. 5.25 3/5 Seo ae id pen eat ee me Sopereeeee 60.
Tasca oullOMeten: aoe ce oe ae ee ee eee 80
Apeonne. .- 222-222 25st ie oe Say ee ee ee 120

560

The figures for the Choctaw appear to tell a siniple story. Setting
aside two or three early estimates, which are evidently too small or
too large, there is practical unanimity. It wotld seem from the
figures given us by travelers and officials that during the eighteenth
century the tribe had a population of about 15,000. Only a few
small tribes were added to it during the historic period. Toward

1 MS., Ayer Lib.

ig: iat saad th iim a tae atlas Rl Wh ee enack we He haces beat ha

Pe Le

te
Pa
e

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 451

the end of that century and during the first three decades of the
nineteenth the population appears to have increased gradually, for
the census of 1831, taken just before the removal, shows 19,554.!
Allowing for the 1,000 or 2,000 Choctaw who remained in Mississippi
and are not always enumerated in the later returns, we seem to have
& surprising constancy in Choctaw population. Thus in 1904, when
a careful census was made in which the Indians, intermurried whites,
freemen, and Mississippi Choctaw were carefully distinguished, we
find 15,550 Indians belonging to the old emigration to Oklahoma to
whom the 2,255 ‘Mississippi Choctaws’’ must be added.? These
last were not, however, the Choctaw then living in Mississippi, but
those who had emigrated recently from that State to share in the
Choctaw allotment. As in 1910 there were 1,366 in Mississippi,
Alabama, Louisiana, and other States,* we must also add at least that
number, making a total of 18,539. This shows a decrease of only
about 1,000 since 1831, but to the earlier figures something like 1,200
must be added for those Choctaw who had left the nation previous
to the census of 1831 and settled in Louisiana and Texas. An
actual decline of about 2,200 is thus indicated. It must, however,
be remembered that the amount of Indian blood represented by the
18,539 Choctaw listed in 1904 was much sinaller in quantity, relatively
as well as absolutely, than that in the 19,554 of 1831, the quantity
of white and Negro blood having been continually on the increase.
From 1903 to 1914 the figures of the Indian Office show an apparent
increase, so that, including the older emigrants to Oklahoma, the
later emigrants, and the Indians in other States, there is a total of
20,451. But when one considers the premium placed upon Indian
blood during the period of allotment and the constant lowering of the
bars it will at once be suspected that all of this is not a legitimate
Indian growth, and that these 20,451 are for the most part not ethnic
Indians but legal Indians. The true state of affairs is probably
approached much closer in the census returns of 1910, in which we
find 14,551 given in Oklahoma, 1,162 in Mississippi, 115 in Louisiana,
57 in Alabama, and 32 in other States—a total of 15,917.23 There
had thus been an actual decrease in the numbers of the tribe since
1831, and a still greater decrease in its blood, though this latter must
be corrected in turn by the addition of a certain amount which has
passed out among the whites and Negroes and is no longer recognized
as Choctaw, or even as Indian, and by allowing for certain individuals
who have left the Indian country and now live the lives of ordinary
white citizens.
1 Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., Ist sess., M1, p. 149.

2 Rept. Comm. Ind. Aff. for 1904, p. 598.
3 Ind. Pop. in the U. 8., Census of 1910, p. 17.

ry ~ , .
452 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

The following table contains the figures upon which this discussion
is based: 4

PoruLATION OF THE CHocTAW AT VARIOUS PERIODS PRIOR To 1834 !

Authority. Year. Warriors. Total population.
enva lle iss sec soos onan See eae ce 1702 3, 800-4, 000 | 7/13, 300-14, 000]
pela Venhe anc. Os ite eae ee re ee TiO4bg | etree Mere 37, 000-8, 000
MEG UL MILAN Sache tee se BP eo. ee ae et eee 1715 700 [2, 450]
ienyille se -< aden sae nee eee cee ee 1725-26 8, 000 [28, 000]
ecw proullets aes, toh J arte ee ie Be 1730 +3, 000 [+10, 500]
Reve Bau dOmM se Se cae apron oe gee 1732 1, 466 [5, 131]
Colonial Records of Georgia. ....-.-..-- SPARE OBE IN 16, 000 [56,-000]
Colonial Records of Georgia. .........---- 1739 5, 000 4117, 500]
Anonymous French MS.2. 22222 ij 4--s5.26 = 1750(?) +3, 610 5 412, 635
TAGE grip rh aati ic SOR i 1750(?) °4, 500 [15, 750]
Weckerlerec =. co-. 28 ot gue ohene ese 1758 3, 500-4, 000 | 7 [12, 250-14, 000]
1 SLOG RINE! es ates Rear oenes SEE Be ha: 1764 4, 500 [15, 750]
IP LChIMS tects Se Oana ele epee Sacer ee AGA Val ee Ne oe ee See ° 21, 500
Letter of John Stuart. <2/20 5. 525 ee 1764 5, 000 [17, 500]
Pethite se oa ote estes ten oo ears: 1768 800-900 [ 2, 800-3, 150]
Romans = cle osee soeew eol sits een ne 1771 2, 600 9, 100
IRSMBCY 2.8 eset Jere ee le eat eee 1780 4,141 13, 423
SIRE, SB eee ead a ie eee ane 1785 4, 500 [15, 750]
Schermerhonn:accs,o cia. ese oem eee 1814 4, 000 15, 000
18 W016 (23(01) Bee aa ege ie Se een seme eace 1S2 0 pee ea 15, 000-20, 000
IWOrseS 2S ese eee eile see cies nee ne eels Sorel LOD, lleeeas tee cise 25, 000
Armstrong (a.@ensus) += S222 - loss ees se PISS? M3 one 19, 554

1 Authorities: Ibervillein Margry, Déc.,1v, pp.601-602; Compte Rendu, Int. Cong. Am., X Vsess.,1,p.35;
Mollmap; Ga. Col. Rec., v, p* 56; Ibid., p. 191; Mem. Am. Anth. Ass’n, Vv, No. 2, pp. 71-72; Adair, Hist.
Am. Inds., p. 282; De Kerlerec in Compte Rendu, Int. Cong. Am., XV sess.,1, p. 76; Bouquet in
Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, m, p. 559; Hutchins, ibid., p. 555; Am. Hist. Mag., vol. Xx, 4, p. 825; Potter in
Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., lst ser.,X, p. 121; Romans, Concise Nat. Hist. of E.and W. Fla., p.74; Ramsey
in Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., ist ser.,1V, p. 99; Smith in Schoolcraft, Ind. Tribes, m1, p. 555; Schermerhorn
in Mass. Hist. Soc. Colls., 2d ser., 1, p. 17; Hodgson, Journ. N. Amer., pp. 274-275; Morse, Rept. to Sec. of
War, p. 364; Reports U. S. Ind. Office; Ind. Pop.in U.S., U.S. Census of 1910, p. 15.

2 Figures in brackets are derived by multiplying the number of warriors by 33; the rest are as givenin
the originals.

3 More than 700-800 cabins.

446 towns.

5 45 towns.

6 Not above this figure.

752 towns.

8 Correspondence on the subject of the Emigration of Indians, &c., Senate Document No. 512, 1833, Wash-
ington, 1835, M1, p. 149

sik ce faplacgnanish jae pipeline

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 458

CHocTAw POPULATION SUBSEQUENT TO 1834

1835. United States Indian Office, 18,500.

1838-1843. United States Indian Office, 18,500.

1844. United States Indian Office, 19,410.

1845. United States Indian Office, 19,392.

1847. United States Indian Office, 16,000.

1850. United States Indian Office, 12,760.

1853. Schoolcraft (from census rolls), 15,767.

1854. United States Indian Office, 15,767.

1855. United States Indian Office, 16,000.

1856. United States Indian Office, 22,707.

1857. United States Indian Office, 19,707.

1861. United States Indian Office, 18,000.

1865-1870. United States Indian Office, 12,500.

1871. United States Indian Office, 15,000.

1872-1878. United States Indian Office, 16,000.

1879. United States Indian Office, 16,500.

1880. United States Indian Office, 15,800.

1881. United States Indian Office, 15,890.

1882. United States Indian Office, 16,000.

1883-1885. United States Indian Office, 18,000.

1886. United States Indian Office, 16,000.

1887. United States Indian Office, 18,000.

1888. United States Indian Office, 18,200.

1889-1892. United States Indian Office, 18,000.

1893-94. United States Indian Office, 20,000.

1895-1897. United States Indian Office, 17,819.

1898. United States Indian Office, 18,456, including freedmen but excluding inter-
married whites.

1898. United States Indian Office, 19,406, including freedmen and intermarried
whites.

1900. United States Indian Office, 20,250.

1901. United States Indian Office, 16,000, not counting 4,250 freedmen.

1902. United States Indian Office, 20,250, including freedmen.

1903. United States Indian Office, 14,918, besides 205 intermarried whites and 2,983
freedmen.

1904. United States Indian Office, 15,550, besides 954 intermarried whites, 4,722
freedmen, and 2,255 Mississippi Choctaws.'

1905. United States Indian Office, 17,160, besides 1,467 intermarried whites, 5,254
freedmen, and 1,235 Mississippi Choctaws.

1906. United States Indian Office, 17,529, besides 1,550 intermarried whites, 5,378
freedmen, and 1,356 Mississippi Choctaws.

1907. United States Indian Office, 19,036, besides 1,585 intermarried whites and
5,994 freedmen.

1908. United States Indian Office, 19,036, including 10,717 mixed bloods, but not
including 1,585 intermarried whites and 5,994 freedmen.

1909. United States Indian Office, 19,106, including 10,769 mixed bloods, but not
including 1,671 intermarried whites and 5,994 freedmen.

1910. Census returns (including 1,162 in Mississippi, 14,551 in Oklahoma, 115 in
Louisiana, 57 in Alabama, and 32 in other States), 15,911.

1 By Mississippi Choctaws are meant Indians in the Choctaw Nation who had recently arrived from
Mississippi; those remajning in the latter State are spoken of as Choctaws in Mississippi.

454 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

1910. United States Indian Office, 17,489, besides 1,651 intermarried whites, 5,985
freedmen, and 1,637 Mississippi Choctaws.
1911-12. United States Indian Office, 17,479, besides 1,651 intermarried whites,

5,985 freedmen and 1,672 Mississippi Choctaws.

1913. United States Indian Office, 17,328, besides 1,651 intermarried whites, 5 fae»
freedmen, and 1,639 Mississippi Choctaws.

1914. United States Indian Office, 17,446, besides 1,651 intermarried whites, 5,994
freedmen, and 1,639 Mississippi Cae

1915. United States Indian Office, 20,799 (8,444 full bloods, 2,473 half bloods or
more, 10,822 less than half blood, including 1,651 by intermarriage); freedmen

6,029; in Mississippi 1,253; in Louisiana, a few.

1916-1919. United States Indian Office, 17,488 by blood, 1,651 intermarried, 6,029
freedmen, 1,660 ‘‘Mississippi Choctaw,”’ and 1,253 in the State of Mississippi.

To the last figures must be added about 200 for the Choctaw in
Louisiana, Alabama, and elsewhere.

The only early town-by-town censuses of the Choctaw Nation
which have come to my attention are contained in two manuscripts,
the one in the French archives, a copy bemg in the Library of Con-
gress, the other in a manuscript preserved in the Edward E. Ayer
collection at the Newberry Library, Chicago,’ the same from which
the Chickasaw census on page 450 was ea The first is dated 1730
and is by Regis du Roullet, a French officer sent among the Choctaw
in order to enlist their aid against the Natchez Indians; the author
of the second is unknown and its date uncertain, that provisionally
set for it, 1750, being more likely too late than too early.

The following table embodies the material contained in these two
lists, the subdivisions being given in accordance with the census of
1750, and the orthography of the town names in accordance with
the same census except in the case of those towns which do not

appear in it:
NuMBER oF MEN IN THE CHocTaw TOWNS

Those of the east: 17302 1750
@hicachae:.csssreo-aes Seer hase eae eee ee eer ees 160 150
Qsquee ‘alagna:s.s- 5 s.. 522 Siete ee sae oi se a a $200 400
Ub See Alt ow aia Seeman OG eer acsoh ont rsere Sek: 60 60
NachonbaotWen yas 220 555 ste in) ie oe ei ye pn ne ee 50 40
Nacchoubaniouny 2 =. 4-4-2 Sj2ce 35 te See see ee 20 <> ayae
Bouctowilowtelty soo boa. 4 sees aga aerate ee 30 30
AY OUAIDY «5 sain 2 oe a nla sew io atalino sm we es nl ip a tet ae 50 30

Those of the south:

Conehats owes «woah «oct te eee a= Seer te Sern Sie co ee ee 100 4150
BY AAAI G 5 ce = oa wi Sica cle Sipe nn a orm ct ee 60 100
QameTotisas.. 2-22 acts tance ees: oa eine = eae 100 80
(git CHALOM (ac. =< Bec «510.9 oo See OES sei ae ee 80 §680

1Mem. Am. Anth. Assn., v, No. 2, pp. 71-72.

2 The number of men in a few of these towns is given in a communication by the same writer the year
before. These are Coit Chitou 400, Bouctouléuchy (?) 20, Yanabé 30, Oqueloiisa 60, Coucha 209, and 30
youths, Nachoubaoiienya 30, Osquea alagna 500, Tala 30, Youanny 60, Chicachaé 150.

3 Including Cheniacha.

4 Adair, however, reports ‘‘ Coosah,” the Conchats of the above list, to have been the largest town in
his time.—Hist. Am. Inds., p. 283.

pita tS sad Atulblpe aly gods tine Yat te

g =

eat

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 455

Those of the west: 1730 1750
eae NO sa tee ts. ey Geen wat awe ch kod S44 wenlnw See bth! 60
a iatepenmns Sees es Sept os GPE tk geet ces bins eee whats 1035-50
lt ap ES SS Fie ol oe ae ee a A ma 30 40
EE Tas BE IB Se ae Sar ea ee ree 15 70
Deemnuni PLTECHIDOUU ea: cote cot fs one esse ~ 22 dsc eset. eee 60 40
Ao BS op eae = Teta Ac > gy Saale ne a aes ee Os ae 60
MECH EI MmLIIC i to" Lele ce ees Sea oct SS fo cases EEL peas eT
Louscouchetacanlé [ Pouscouchetacanlé].............-------------- 80 50
RO RAER ARON ee Oe eI eS nw el aves eles Sn ye inl Sow 2 20 30
RCE Ae ea Set. 2. eet ee Dead s Seige oe sae yee ee eat LOO
Tsp oy ela ga ere aS pe A ca 20 60
MIE RMNCRE RG Steet fe Mei TAS he Ce Nee Soe. So a 100 ~=—-:150
ol LS Ok ps eB EER Sea See Soha ge Si hae Sete nee ioe Be Fear 100
SEEN IEURO 8 Ae NI re etek Se sce) oeccs keel Glee ee 130 80
SEDs Ti pi a Ce he RE a a eR ome Ses ere 20
ONE SE ei he ge tan Se ae A Te gare die Sy a oo SE 120 80
(PUIG te SSE sate Rape i 3 ai pl i a ge Pa 60 40
ee eet RS Sere 538 eae a SS wt oe eee oe 50 200
SRE MUR Sot See n= TAS se betes se se so SE ee ena oh he 130 70
MUMIEBGM TE Seri sn eset ia ae Tels he doe 2 ee Picnin dageeiaie seca a 40
LES SS ae ae PU RIS it eR Re Ee eS oe Oy 40
CELINE Ot ge IN ee ae ee 8 een ee ee Ss 20° ~~ «+30
PENCIL ee Sn ane SY OP ew ne oti n een see seg Suc e oe 15 80
“TEE AA tS ee lg i Sage ai EO a en a at hg ie tha See 180 ~=30
MST OORNOUI Se eo ees ae cts a eee R dt Sos Pe Pee 100 ~—- 60
“Eke CUS LS 2a ES Rs ae ee Ee Ad ee 130 90
MEMES ChOUeA-IOUPDLE 52 oe ep Salsa esa ance Se ae 40 :
BP SEED. ee SS ie Se a a ag ry a Re Si I eR 100 60
UML EATLE Th ee eeP sipante CERES aii Sia etaen Sa a nent ee a ee Sea 50 40
OUT eenpee Se ee ee eae ae re roe tO a ede Sree ea SOCs Lesa el 60 50
POURCMIPE CGS na aa nskt ek. oda ne eel te Ske SPC. aka ee 30 ‘
pernipee Nee tet areata’ ters de Pee 1d cite sii ge Eee s Saaz ndbee tsi. 20 ~=«60
SECM TORPAROING UMiar eet en. MESS on IS oe ie a db we hock 70 70
Pranpemar uo | TtcOkChaqMol: 2. 2m 2 25 22 2 fo se SS eee eave beens t 100 ~=100
LECCE UE Shaye Ss A om LOOP aor
TED ot 2 cbc en a ce a aN cg sen ER ee a eect
MEUM Lame ees 52 Se, Pet Ee eres See ams ES 30 80
RUEBEN RE ise i. Sie nig ab ae a Seg ees ee elas tee Bs ol te os wa Go B06 Bec
Mpreoupoupouls...i- 25-5... -..= 55 Se Re eee Degen ead See set 80
OL ee CO eS ee Pe ere ene = peng ss)

While the number of southern tribes progressively decreased from
early times until many of them became wholly or nearly extinct, the
surviving groups, the Creeks, Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw,
appear at first rather to have increased. Owing to their numerous
wars the Chickasaw decreased in the first half of the eighteenth
century, but after that time there is evidence that they grew rapidly,
until they reached about 5,000, where their population remained
stationary down to the present day. In appearance they continued

1 Spelled Atchouchouga by Regis du Roullet.

456 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

to mount up much beyond that point, but later figures show that this
was due to the inclusion of an almost equal number of Negro freedmen

among them. Actually we find that the proportion of full bloods —

has decreased and that the maintenance of their numbers exclusive

of freedmen has been due to an extensive contribution of white and ~

Negro blood. Like the Chickasaw, the Creeks show a considerable
increase during the last part of the eighteenth century and the first
part of the nineteenth, in spite of the many Indians who removed to
Florida. This growth may have been in part fictitious since, when a
census was taken in 1857, both Creeks and Seminole were found much
less numerous than had been supposed. Nevertheless the figures for
the Seminole which can be checked show that before these tribes were
removed to the West they were populous. Their losses during the emi-
eration and in the period during which they were trying to adapt them-
selves to their new surroundings may account in part for the discrepancy,
although in the case of the Creeks there may have been some frauds
due to the intrigues of designing contractors. Still the Creeks can
hardly have been less than 15,000, and 20,000 would not be an exces-
sive estimate for the mother tribe of a people of 5,000 like the Semi-
nole. From time to time these tribes have undergone periods of increase
and decrease. Asin the case of the Chickasaw, their apparent strength
has been augmented by including Negro freedmen, descendants of
those slaves formerly held by the Indians. In the case of the Creeks,
Seminole, and Choctaw, however, the Negroes were not so numerous,
being a little more than one-third instead of a little less than one-
half. The number of Creek and Seminole full bloods has also declined
progressively. In 1908 rather more than half of both were returned
as full-blood Indians, but I am confident that the actual number is
very much smaller, so small as to be barely a handful. In short the
Indian blood in all of these tribes appears to be spreading out con-
tinually, but it is spreading over a body of white and Negro blood
ever greater in amount, while the Indian blood becomes less and less.

Perhaps we shall not be far wrong if we assume a Creek population
of about 7,000 in 1700, 12,000 in 1750-1760, 20,000 in 1832, 15,000
in 1857, 10,000 in 1898 (exclusive of freedmen), and 7,000 in 1910.
For the Seminole we may give the following estimates: 1,500 in 1780,
4,750 in 1821, 2,500 in 1857, 3,500 in 1892, 2,500 in 1906 (Gncluding
freedmen), and down to the present time, with the same increase of
white and Negro blood. For the Chickasaw: 3,000 to 3,500 in 1700,
2,000 in 1715, 1,500 in 1750-1770, 3,600 in 1821, 5,000 in 1836, 4,000
in 1910. For the Choctaw: 15,000 in 1700, 21,000 in 1831, 16,000 in
1910, with the reservations above made.

Feit etn ey

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ACCOUNT SHEWING THE PROGRESS OF THE COLONY OF GEORGIA FROM ITS FIRST
ESTABLISHMENT. Published by order of the Honorable Trustees [for establishing
the Colony of Georgia in America], London, 1741.

Apair, Jas. The history of the American Indians. London, 1775.

ALABAMA ANTHROPOLOGICAL Society, Handbook, 1920. Montgomery, Ala., 1920.

ALABAMA HisroricaL Socrery, Transactions of the. Tuscaloosa, Ala., 1896-1900.

ALvorpb, CLARENCE W., and Brncoop, LEE. First explorations of the Trans-Alle-
gheny region by the Virginians, 1650-1674. Cleveland, 1912.

AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN AND ORIENTAL JouRNAL. Vols. I-xxxu, Chicago [and
elsewhere], 1878-1910.

AMERICAN Stare Papers. Documents, legislative and executive, of the Congress of
the United States. Class II, Indian Affairs. Vols. rm. Washington, 1832-34,
Public Lands. Vols. vin. Washington, 1832-1861.

AYER LIBRARY OF AMERICANA, in Newberry Library, Chicago, Ill. Original Span
ish and French MSS. and copies of such MSS.

Banve.ier, Ap. F., ed. The journey of Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca. Trans. by
F. Bandelier. New York, 1905.

Barcia CARBALLIDO y ZuNIGA, ANDRES G. Ensayo cronolégico para la historia
general de la Florida, 1512-1722, por Gabriel de Cardenas Z. Cano [pseud.]. Madrid,
1723.

BartraM, JoHN. Description of East Florida. London, 1769.

Bartram, Wm. Travels through North and South Carolina, Georgia, East and West
Florida, the Cherokee country, the extensive territories of the Muscogulges or Creek
Confederacy, and the country of the Chactaws. Philadelphia, 1791. London,
1792.

Brpcoop, Lee. See Alvord, Clarence W., and Bidgood.

Bo.ttaert, WM. Observations on the Indian tribes in Texas. (Jour. Ethnol. Soc.
London, vol. m, 1850.)

BosomwortH, THomas. Journal of 1752. [MS. in South Carolina Archives; copy
in Archives Bur. Amer. Ethnol.]

Bossu, M. Nouveaux Voyages aux Indes Occidentales; Contenant une Relation
des différens Peuples qui habitent les environs du grand Fleuve Saint-Louis,
appellé vulgairement le Mississipi; leur Religion; leur gouvernement; leurs moeurs;
leurs guerres & leur commerce. Vols. -1. Paris, 1768.

Bourne, E. G., ed. Narratives of the career of Hernando de Soto. Vols. tn.
New York, 1904.

Brinton, Dante, G. Notes on the Floridian peninsula, its literary history, Indian
tribes and antiquities. Philadelphia, 1859.

Burk, Joun. The history of Virginia from its first settlement to the present day.
Vols. rm. Petersburg, Va., 1805.

BusHNELL, Davin I., Jr. The account of Lamhatty. Amer. Anthrop., n. s. vol.
10, No. 4, pp. 568-574, Lancaster, 1908. °

CANDLER, ALLEN D. See CotontaL RecorDs oF THE STATE OF GEORGIA.

Carrot, B. R. Historical collections of South Carolina; embracing many rare and
valuable pamphlets, and other documents, relating to the history of that state,
from its first discovery to its independence, in the year 1776. Vols. 1. New
York, 1836.

457

She

458 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL.73

Conen, M. M. Notices of Florida and the Campaigns. New York, 1836.

COLECCION DE DOCUMENTOS INEDITOS, relativos al descubrimiento, conquista y colo-
nizacién de las posesiones Espafiolas en América y Oceania. Tomos1-xuir.- Madrid,
1864-84.

CottoT, Le GENERAL Victor. Voyage dans l’Amérique Septentrionale, etc. Vols.
rand atlas. Paris, 1826.

CotonraL Recorps or THE STATE oF GEORGIA (THE). Compiled and published
under authority of the Legislature, by Allen D. Candler. Atlanta, Ga:, 1904-1909.

Concris INTERNATIONAL DES AMERICANISTES. Compte-rendu. Quinziéme ses-
sion, Québec, 1906. Quebec, 1907.

CORRESPONDENCE ON THE SUBJECT OF THE EMIGRATION OF INDIANS. Vols. I-v.
(Sen. Doc. 512, 23rd Cong., Ist sess., Washington, 1834-1835.)

Coxe, Daniev. A description of the English province of Carolana. By the Span-
iards call’d Florida, and by the French, La Louisiane. London, 1741. (Same, in
Frencu, B. F., Historical collections of Louisiana, 2d ed., pt. 2, Philadelphia,
1850.)

Davies, JNo. History of the Carribbee islands. Translated from the French.
London, 1666.

Davita PapiniA, Fray Auacustin. Historia de la fundacion y discurso de Ja pro-
vincia de Santiago de Mexico de la Orden de Predicadores por los vidas de sus varones
insignes y casos notables de Nueva Espafia. Brussels, 1625.

De Braum, JoHN GERAR WittiAMs. History of the Province of Georgia. _ Wormsloe,
1899.

DESCRIPTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA. (Anonymous.) 1761.

DICKENSON, JONATHAN. Narrative of a shipwreck in the Gulph of Florida. 6th ed.
Stanford, N. Y., 1803.

Dorsey, JAMES OWEN, and Swanton, JoHN R. A dictionary of the Biloxi and Ofo
languages. Bull. 47, Bur. Amer. Ethn., Washington, 1912.

ETHNOLOGICAL Soctery or Lonpon. Journal, vols. tv, Edinburgh and London,
1848-56. New series, vols. 1-1, London, 1869-71.

——— Transactions, vols. 1-vur, London, 1861-69.

Farrpanks,G.R. History of St. Augustine. New York, 1858.

——— History of Florida, 1512-1842. Philadelphia, 1871.

FonTANEDA, HERNANDO DE EscanANnTE. Memoria de las cosas y costa y Indios de la
Florida. (Documentos Inéditos, tomo v, 532-548, Madrid, 1866. Same, in Smith,
B., Letter of Hernando de Soto, and Memoir of Hernando de Escalante Fontaneda,
Washington, 1854. Same, French trans., in Ternaux-Compans, Voyages, tome xx,
9-42, Paris, 1841.)

Frencu, B. F. Historical collections of Louisiana, embracing many rare and valuable
documents relating to the natural, civil, and political history of that state. Parts
1-v. New York, 1846-53. (Same, New ser., New York, 1869. Same, Second ser.,
New York, 1875.)

GAFFAREL, Paut Louris Jacques. Histoire de la Floride fran¢aise. Paris, 1875.

GatscHet, ALBERTS. The Timucua language. (Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., vols. xv1-
xvi, Philadelphia, 1877-1880.)

——— A migration legend of the Creek Indians. Vol. 1, Philadelphia, 1884 [Brinton’s
Librasy of Aboriginal American Literature, No. 4]. Vol. m, St. Louis, 1888 [Trans.
Acad. Sci. St. Louis, vol. v, nos. 1 and 2].

Georer1a Historica Socrety. Collections. Vols.1-rv. Savannah, 1840-78.

GomarRA, Francisco Lopez pe. Historia de las Indias. Antwerp, 1554. (French
trans., Paris, 1606.)

Grece, ALEXANDER. History of the old Cheraws, containing an account of abo-
riginesof the Pedee, 1730-1810. New York, 1867.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 459

Haxktuyt, Ricnarp. Collection of the early voyages, travels, and discoveries of the
English nation. Vols. rm. London, 1810.

Hamitton, Peter J. Colonial Mobile, an historical study largely from original
sources, of the Alabama-Tombigbee basin from the discovery of Mobile bay in
1519 until the demolition of Fort Charlotte in 1820. Boston and New York, 1910.

Hanna, ©. A. The wilderness trail, or the ventures and adventures of the Pennsyl-
vania traders on the Allegheny Path with some new annals of the old West, and
the records of some strong men and some bad ones. Vols. -m. New York and
London, 1911.

Harrisse, Henry. The discovery of North America. A critical documentary and
historic investigation. London and Paris, 1892.

Hawkins, Bens. A sketch of the Creek country, in 1798 and 99. (Georgia Hist.
Soe. Colls., vol. m1, Savannah, 1848.) Besides the original of this work in the pos-
session of the Georgia Historical Society there is a copy, also in Hawkins’s hand-
writing, in the Manuscripts Division of the Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
There are few differences of consequence between this and the published version,
but a number of minor points, and where the Library of Congress MS. seems to be
superior I have followed it. I have not attempted to point out these changes
separately, but-the more material divergencies are indicated in footnotes.

Letters of Benjamin Hawkins 1796-1806. (Georgia Hist. Soc. Colls., vol. ix,
Savannah, 1916.)

Haywoop, JNo. The natural and aboriginal history of Tennessee, up to the first
settlements therein by the white people, in the year 1768. Nashville, 1823.

HerrerA, ANTONIO DE. Historia general de los hechos de los Castellanos en las
islas i tierra firme del mar oceano. Tomosr1-v. Madrid, 1720.

Hewat, Avex. Historical account of the rise and progress of the colonies of South
Carolina and Georgia. Vols. 11. London, 1779.

Hopeson, ApaM. Remarks during a Journey through North America in the years
1819, 1820, and 1821. New York, 1823.

Imiay, GmBert. A topographical description of the western territory of North
America. London, 1797.

InpiAN Arratrs (U.S.). Office of Indian Affairs (War Department). Reports,
1825-1848. Report of the Commissioner (Department of the Interior), 1849-1914.

InpDIAN TREATIES and laws and regulations relating to Indian affairs. Washington,
1826.

Treaties between the United States of America and the several Indian tribes
from 1778 to 1837. Washington, 1837.

INDIAN POPULATION IN THE UNITED STATES AND ALASKA, 1910. (Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington, 1915.)

Jerrerys, THos. The natural and civil history of the French dominions in North
and South America. Parts rm. London, 1761.

The American atlas or a geographical description of the whole continent of
America. London, 1776.

Jesurr Reiations and allied documents. Travels and explorations of the Jesuit
missionaries in New France, 1610-1791. Reuben Gold Thwaites, ed. Vols. r-.xx1.
Cleveland, 1896-1901.

Relations des Jesuites contenant ce qui s’est passé de plus remarquable dans
les missions des péres de la Compagnie de Jesus dans la Nouvelle-France. Embras-
sant les années 1611-1672. Tomes 1-mr. Quebec, 1858.

Jones, CHas. C. Historical sketch of Tomo-chi-chi. Albany, 1868.

KercHevaL, Samugey. A History of the Valley of-Virginia. Winchester, 1833.

La Harpe, BERNARD DE. Journal historique de 1’éstablissement des Frangais A la
Louisiane. Nouvelle Orléans, 1831. (Same, trans. in French, B. F., Hist. Coll.
La., vol. m1, New York, 1851.)

460 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73

LAUDONNIBRE, René. L’ Histoire notable de la Floride située és Indes Occidentales,
contenant les trois voyages faits en icelle par certains Capitaines et Pilotes fran¢ois,
qui y a commandé l’espace d’un an trois moys: a laquelle a esté adjousté un
quatriesme voyage fait par le Capitaine Gourgues, mise en lumiére par M. Basnier.
Paris, 1586. (Same, Paris, 1853.)

History of the first attempt of the French (The Huguenots) to colonize the
newly discovered country of Florida. (A translation of the above in French,
B. F., Hist. Colls. of La. and Fla., n. s., pp. 165-175, New York, 1869.) a

Lawson, JNo. History of Carolina, containing the exact description and natural
history of that country. London, 1714. (Reprint, Raleigh, 1860.)

LEDERER, JoHN. The discoveries of John Lederer in three several marches from
Virginia to the west of Carolina and other parts of this continent; begun in March,
1669 and ended September, 1670. Together with a general map of the whole ter-
ritory which he traversed. Collected and translated by Sir William Talbot, Bar-
onet. London, 1672. Reprinted, Rochester, N. Y., 1902.

LE Moyne, Jacques. Narrative of Le Moyne, an artist who accompanied the French
expedition to Florida under Laudonnieére, 1564. Translated from the Latin of De
Bry. Boston, 1875.

Le Pace pu Pratz, Anrorne 8S. Histoire de la Louisiane. Tomes -1m. Paris,
1758. (Same, English trans., London, 1763, 1774.)

Liprary oF Conaress, Manuscripts Division. One of the greatest single sources
of information, rich in original documents and in copies of such documents. ~~

Loaan, Jno. H. A history of the upper country of South Carolina, from the earliest
period to the close of the War of Independence. Vol.1. Charleston and Columbia,
1859.

Louisiana Historicat Society MSS.

Lowery, Woopsury. The Spanish settlements within the present limits of the

United States. 1513-1561. New York and London, 1901.

Spanish settlements within the present limits of the United States: Florida,

1564-1574. New York and London, 1905.

Florida Manuscripts. (Library of Congress.)

MacCautey, CLiay. The Seminole Indians of Florida. Fifth Ann. Rept. Bur. Ethn.,
pp. 469-531.

M’Catt, Hueu. The history of Georgia, containing brief sketches of the most remark-
able events, up to the present day. Vols. 1-1. Savannah, 1811-16.

Marcry, Prerre. Découvertes et établissements des Fran¢ais dans l’ouest et dans
le sud de l’Amérique Septentrionale (1614-1754). Mémoires et documents orig-
inaux, Pts. I-vi. Paris, 1875-86.

Martyr, PETER (D’ANGHIERA). De Orbe Novo. English trans. by F. A. MacNutt.
Vols. 1. New York, 1912.

MassacHuseTrs HistoricaL Society. Collections. Vols. 1~-x, Boston, 1792-1809
(vol. 1 reprinted in 1806 and 1859; vol. v in 1816 and 1835). 2d ser., 1-x, Boston,
1814-23 (reprinted 1838-43). 3d ser., -x, Boston, 1825-49 (vol. 1 reprinted 1846).
4th ser., 1-x, Boston, 1852-71.

Mereness, Newron D., ed. Travels in the American Colonies. New York, 1916.

Mitrort, Le Cierc. Mémoire ou coup-d’ceil rapide sur mes différens voyages et
mon séjour dans la nation Créck. Paris, 1802.

MississipPt PRovinciAL ARCHIVES, 1763-1766. English Dominion. Compiled and
edited by Dunbar Rowland. Vol.1. Nashville, Tenn., 1911.

Mooney, JAMES. The Siouan Tribes of the East. Bull. 22, Bur. Amer, Ethn.,
Washington, 1894.

Myths of the Cherokee. Nineteenth Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pt. 1, Wash-
ington, 1900.

SWANTON] EARLY HISTORY OF THE CREEK INDIANS 461

Morse, Jepm1an. A report to the Secretary of War of the United States, on Indian
affairs, comprising a narrative of a tour performed in the summer of 1820. New
Haven, 1822. :

NAVARRETE, MARTIN FERNANDEZ DE. Coleccion de los viages y descubrimientos que
hicieron por mar los Espafioles desde fines del siglo xv. Madrid, 1825 [-1837].

Ovrepo Y VALDEZ, GoNZALO FERNANDEZ DE. Historia general y natural de las
Indias. Primera parte. Madrid, 1851.

ParesA, Francisco. Cathecismo, en lengva Castellana, y Timuquana. Mexico,
1612.

Confessionario, en lengua Castellana, y Timuquana. Mexico, 1613.

Arte de la lengva Timvqvana compvesta en 1614. (Bibliothéque Linguis-

tique Américaine, tome x1, Paris, 1886.)

See GatscnetT, A.S. (Timucua language, 1878.)

Pickett, Apert J. History of Alabama, and incidentally of Georgia and Mississippi,
from the earliest period. 3ded. Vols. 1-1. Charleston, 1851.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE BoarRD DEALING witH INDIAN TRADE. (MS. in State Archives
of S. Car.)

Pusuic Recorps or Soutn Carouma. [MSS.] .

Ramsey, J. G. M. The annals of Tennessee to the end of the eighteenth century.
Philadelphia, 1853.

Rivers, W. 8S. A chapter in the early history of South Carolina. Charleston, 1874.

Romans, BERNARD. A concise natural history of East and West Florida. Vol. 1
(Vol. m unpublished). New York, 1775.

Royce, CHarLES ©. Indian Land Cessions in the United States. Eighteenth Ann.
Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., part 2, Washington, 1899.

Rum1az y CaraviA, Eveento. La Florida su conquista y colonizacién por Pedro
Menéndez de Avilés. Vols. 1. Madrid, 1894.

Scnootcrart, Henry R. Historical and statistical information, respecting the
history, condition and prospects of the Indian tribes of the United States. Parts
vi. Philadelphia, 1851-57.

SenaTE DocuMENT 512. See Correspondence on emigration of Indians.

[SERRANO Y Sanz, MANUEL, ed.] Documentos historicos de la Florida y la Luisiana
siglos XVI al XVIII. Madrid, 1913. _

Sarre, Barnarp. The history of Hernando de Soto and Florida; or, record of the
events of fifty-six years, from 1512 to 1568. Philadelphia, 1881.

Srptey, Jno. Historical sketches of the several Indian tribes in Louisiana, south
of the Arkansa river, and between the Mississippi and River Grand. Message
from the President communicating discoveries made by Captains Lewis and Clark,
Washington, 1806. Same, in Am. State Papers, Indian Affairs, vol. 1, 1832. Same,
in Annals of Congress, 9th Cong., 2d sess., 1076-1088.

Smirx, Buckincuam. Two documents in two of the early tongues of Florida,
Apalachian and Timuquan. Washington, 1860.

, tr. Letter of Hernando de Soto and Memoir of Hernando de Escalante Fon-
taneda. Washington, 1854.

Souts CarouiNaA HisTorRIcAL AND GENEALOGICAL MAGAZINE. Vols. I-xvitt.
Charleston, S. C., 1900-1912.

Souta Caro.imna Historica Socrery. Collections. Vols. rv. Charleston and
Richmond, 1857-1897.

Speck, Frank G. The Creek Indians of Taskigi town. (Mem. Am. Anthr. Asso.,
vol. 1, pt. 2, Lancaster, Pa., 1907.)

Ethnology of the Yuchi Indians. (Anthr. Pub. Univ. Mus., Univ. Pa., vol.

1, no. 1, Philadelphia, 1909.)

462 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 73 .

Stieeins, Georce. A historical narration of the genealogy, traditions, and downfall .

of the Ispocoga or Creek tribe of Indians writ by one of the tribe. (MS. = possession
of the Wisconsin Historical Society.)

Swan, CaLEB. Position and state of manners and arts in tie Creek, or Muscogee
Nation in 1791. (Jn Schoolcraft, Indian Tribes, vol. v, pp. 251-283, Philadelphia,
1855.)

Swanton, Jonn R. Indian tribes of the lower Mississippi Valley and adjacent coast
of the Gulf of Mexico. (Bull. 43, Bur. Amer. Ethn., Washington, 1911.)

De Soto’s line of march from the viewpoint of an ethnologist. (Proc. Miss.

Valley Hist. Asso. for 1911-1912, vol. v, pp. 147-157, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 1912.)

See Dorsey, J. O.

Tartrer, Parrick T., ANDERSON, H., Douetas, D., and others. A true and his-
torical narrative of the colony of Georgia. Charles Town, 8. Car., 1741. (Reprinted
in Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., vol. 1, pp. 163-263, Savannah, 1842.)

Tuomas, Cyrus. Introduction to Indian Land Cessions in the United States. By
Charles C. Royce. (Eighteenth Ann. Rept. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pt. 2, Washington,
1902.)

True (A) AND Historica, NARRATIVE OF THE COLONY OF GEORGIA IN AMERICA, &C.
(Anonymous.) Charles Town, 8. C., 1741.

Tuaeie, W. O. Myths of the Creeks. (MS. in archives of the Bureau of American
Ethnology.)

Wiuurams, JNo. Lez. The Territory of Florida; or sketches of the topography, civil
and natural history, of the country. New York, 1837.

Winsor, Justin. Narrative and critical history of America. Vols. I-va1. Boston
and New York, 1884-89.

Woopwarp, THos. 8. Woodward’sreminiscences of the Creek, or Muscogee Indians,
contained in letters to friends in Georgia and Alabama. Montgomery, 1859.

aha eels Rts Pe ie servacublics mer

os a aan Werte ON Ng cecal RS?

Page.
“VETER We aaa ne eee ee 251-254
a division of the Muskogee. ............ 215, 251
and Natchez, described by Stiggins...... 251
derivation of the name................... 252
BIPTAUOUS Ol set niman seta de Ga oh 253
population of....... se a tien ge ch 431
relations of, with Coosa.................- 251
town, described by Hawkins............ 253
ABIHKUTCI—
BRMOKMISKOS TOWN: --. acc. F. nse -- 247
confusion regarding the name............ 252
PI BUUDI Ole ete ess oc eos 5 435
BING, & Timucua TOWN 12 0s:- 222.202 cse.- 323
Prete OOLOSS LOW Eins co 5 in S ne - iewarnie'e 331
ABLANDOLES, Cusabo name of a tribe.......- 20
ACAHONO, a Timucua chief.................- 323
ACKSSA, @ Timucua town....-.-.. 2. -...--- 323

ACCABEE. See Ickabee.
ACELA. See Vicela.

ACHESE, possibly the Coweta................ 226
ACHITIA, a synonym for Chiaha.-........... 169
ACHUSE— .
CUES ISLC) TO) oie eta ee ee 147
USENET IR eI a ee 151
AcosTA, probably Koasati..>................ 201
AcosTE, probably Koasati................... 201
ACPACTANICHE, a Muskogee branch village... 283
ACQUERA. See Acuera.
ACUERA, a Timucua province............... 323
ADRIAN, an Apalachee chief ._............... 125
ADULTERY, customs regarding.. ............ 77-78

_ <Apusta. See Audusta, Edisto.
- A€QuITE. Sce Aeykite.

AEYKITE—
a Lower Creek town: .......2....5.25..-- 174
a synonym for Hitchiti..........2....... 175
eT eTs GE es ae a ee a a 175
AGILE. See Assile.
BPPAGBICULTURE 02. 5.00-.---cc-.-c---- 63, 75, 359-360
AGUACALECUEN, a Timucua town and prov-
ACD) ede RS ae ee ee ae ae 323, 334

AGUACALEYQUEN. See Aguacalecuen.
AGUERA. See Acuera.
AcutL. See Assile.

_ AHAPAPKA, a Seminole town...............- 412
A-HA-POP-KA, a Seminole town....-......... 406
AnoIcA, a Timucua town...................- 323
AHONGATE, a Tupiqui Indian............... 83
AHoPo. See Asopo.

_ AHOSULGA, a Seminole town................. 411
AHOYA— :

a Cusabo town name-.--................ 20, 22

MUCH WiLhtANGUSte..~. 5.522 n et Sek. 56

an island visited by Juan Pardo......... 55
AHOYABI—

LESH: 2 ri a 30

SIECE EO NOYES > oar ec ccccoyece ce -vt 55

Page.
AINE, name substituted for Somme by Le
DA OWT GS acre ee oe ENS eR ee 51, 52
AIOUACHE, identification of...............-.. 212
AIs—
a Florida tribe and province........._. 331, 333
association of, with Surruque...........- 337
Ceremonial: £2522 ct ee ioc aen Jem 396
culture of people of: 2.25. oe 397
described by Dickenson..............- 390-398
information concerning. ............-.... 389
wal of Spaniards with. 2.22214: 222 342
Alz. See Ais. ;
AKFACHES, an Okfuskee town............... 246
AKFEECHKOUTCHIS, an Okfuskee town...._.. 246
AKTCABEHALE, old Alabama town........... 199
ALABAMA ANTHROPOLOGICAL SOCIETY, hand-
book published. by: =... 22 -222-5.- 2522.2! --10
ALABAMA Fort, establishment of the... .... 196
ALABAMTAS TRIBES. 26. ee eta. See Sate 191-201
and Mobile, hostilities between.......... 164
ArshnOMCEIOL te. ene ce Se eho 193
TIMAOUISIATI Sens oes oe at oan a ee 198
invihe} Creek War. 2 -2Tcoh.- tse eee 199
induced to war on the French..........- 194
laneusreoLecy..2- 02. eens soe eae 199
mention e ss. As... eee 150
population oft =.22 e2iss2-8 25 eee - 8 427-429, 437
punitive expedition against............ 194-195
RAWASAISINON G = . rscee eel ne ae aha es 139, 140
traditions of origin of.................. 191-192
war of, with Chickasaw and others....-. 194
War Of, with Hrenchl. 20s. .2. 2 162-163
ALAac Haso—
@ Seminole Chieh.2-. 40-222 2scssne 403
a Yamasee chief...... ee ae eee 108
ALACHEPOYO, a Timucua town.............- 323
ALACHUA—
s.Seminole-town. 205. foc) 0cst cee 400
settlements of, broken up.........-...... 399
ALACHUAS, a synonym for Oconee........... 180

A-LACK-A-WAY-TALOFA, a Seminole town... 406, 407
ALAJE. See Aluque.

A-LA-PA-HA-TALOFA, a Seminole town........ 406
ALATICO, a Timucua town...:.....:-.-.<...- 323
ALCOLA, a'Calusa town. .2.-..-2 2.22.22. 331
ATEGUIFA, 2 Gualeitown:.=-sc 0.2). os ee See 82
ALIBAMO, province mentioned by Biedma... 192
ALIESTE.~ See Aluste.

ALIMACANI, a Timucua town... ...........-- 323
ALIMAMU, village mentioned by Elvas....... 192
ALKEHATCHEE, a Muskogee branch village... 283
ALLIBAMIS, a Synonym for Alabama........- 198
ATMIGATORS, hunting Of. 3.2 cc. -2 22s sccce = 358
ALLIK HADSHI, one of the six Fowl towns..... 178
ALOUKO, a Seminole town.........:.....-.-- 411
AUPATOPO 8 Guale GOW -micss5 sees ose cccces 83

463

464 INDEX
ALTAMAHA— Page. APALACHEE INDIANS—Continued. Page.
a province visited by De Soto ........... 95 territory occupied by=......-...------- 109-110
head town of the Lower Yamasee........ 95 LO pit GbE seeseceren seosasorccecsss0s 110-112
SVMON VAIS Of: soe eee se stesiae a see 95 under protection of the French.........- 124
ALTAMAHA SouNpD, French and Spanish war Of, with the Yuchi-.......-....---- 299-304
TIAMOS Olsen aches see Sasa eeneemieeeiinere bly |) APATACHE EMISSIONS 22 = nine ascetics 323
ALTAMAHAW, a Yamasec town.............- 97 | APALACHEN, a synonym for Apalachee...... 113
ALUESTE, vassals of chief of............-.---- 60 | APALACHEN PROVINCE, expedition into.... 112-115
See Aluste. APALACHIA, invasion of, by English and
ALUETE, vassals of chief of...........-.--.-- 19 Creeks e. cSis oe -o ote eee eas seca are 121-123
See Aluste. AP ATA CHICOLSS 2, Sone sc cee ote ssn teeta 129-134
ALUQUE, a Guale town..........--.. Sotcaene 185) a Lower Creek tribe and town..... 129, 131, 189
ALUSH, name of a chief.............. sdc080¢ 20, 67 Hitchiti'spoken by=---=-os---seneseeeee 12,130
ALUSTE— - included in Hitchiti group............... 172
a Cusabo tribe, chief, and village...--..- 20,82 location Of. > s-crsen= =e ae aeeeeeee 131
submission of chief of, to Spaniards...... 59 mission among, prevented by Yuchi..... 304
SyMOMUMyanS CODs ane se eige oteeieale ean ae 59 mother town of the Creek confeder-
AMACA, a Timucua town ..-.---.--2..sces-00 323 GCY. sie cob ba dates o Sees nee ante seers 132
AMACANOS, a synonym for Yamasee........ 95,119 name applied to Lower Creeks........... 129
AMACARISSE, a Timucua mission.......-..-- 323 on the Chattahoochee River............- 190
See Nombre de Dios de Amacarisse. OviginnOfe secs cee een eee nee e aleea eee 131
AMAKALLI. See Au-muc-cul-le. PopulationlOfet eee e ease oe cineeeiseeeere 424,435
AMECARIO, aSynonym for Yamacraw....... 168 remotely related to Apalachee........... 130
AMELIA ISLAND, French and Spanish names TOMO Vall Ofe a sae ieee saloon stecera etal ete 101
10) ood Sea SEaE ae se beeeeserecoseacoemacac 51 SACLCU LO PCAC ae eases eet ee 132
AMERCARAIO, a synonym for Yamacraw..... 108 town of, described by Bartram........ 132-133
AMISCARON. See Yamiscaron. APALACHITES, a Synonym for Apalachee..... 118
AMOBI, identification of. ...-.-.....5......00 212 | APALACHOCOLOS, a synonym for Lower
AMOYE, a Cherokee town.............--- poo 24h, Creeks? s s-'s eacote se cc cnet cae 95, 119
ANACAPE, a Timucua town................- . 823 | ApaLAcHucLA. See Apalachicola.
ANACHARAQUA, a Timucua place name...... 324 | APALATCHIKOLIS, a Lower Creek town iden-
ANATICHAPKO. See Au-net-te chap-co. “ tical with Apalachicola: =~ .\sse cee sees 174
ANDRADA, CAPTAIN PEDRO DE, killed by the APALU, a Timucua town. - -<-.5.--sssceenen= 324
BOLAMON. one came lneceste ener teen eeislelsieloias 336 | APATACHES, a misprint for Apalaches........ 128
ANHAYCA APALACHE— APATAI, See Au-put-tau-e.
a synonym for Iniahica........ eececeeeee 111 | APEICAH, a town on the Lamhatty map...... 254
an Apalachee town............- eeeeeeee- 116 | APOJOLA NEGRA, a Calusa town............- 331
ANICA, a Cusabo province. .....2..eeceee- .-. 37 | APPEE-BEE, Indian name of Foster Creek.... 20
ANICATIYA. See Anica. APPELLACHEE INDIANS. See Apalachee.
ANIMALS, domestic, of Florida..... pts erase 355 | APUKASASOCHE, a Seminole town. .......... 412
ANOXA, a Cusabo province. ........-.-.-.--- 37 | AQuERA. See Acuera.
ANSE DES CHACTAS, a tract of land assigned to ARAMBE—
thei CHatotenewceceensteek ccc aaa cee see ee 136 9 Cusaho Province: oes cssce a. see eee 37
ANTONICO, a Timucua town.........20.2---- 324 mentioned by Peter Martyr............- 43
AOBI— ARANUI. See Arambe.
‘q CusabotribGsseese acces ckeneaesacmacse 82 | ARAPAJA, a Timucua place name..........-- 324
possibly intended for Ahoyabi.......... 82 | ARAYA, a Timucua place name.............- 324
submission of chief of, to Spaniards...... 59 | ARCHAHA, a Timucua place name. ......-..- 324
See Ahoyabi. Arrows, of Florida Indians............... 356-357
APAFALAYA, chief of, probably Choctaw..... 421 | ARTHUR, GABRIEL, explorations of.......... 184
APALACHE 0 SACHILE, probably the Osochi... 165 | AsAo—
PAPATA GHEE {INDIANS |p nicoc = cielsiscieisiacenlseime 109-129 a Guale towns: cc tence sero eines 83
among the Alabama. o-<nas scree seme 127 chief of, head of punitive expedition... ... 84, 88
at war with the Tuscarora...........-.-- 18 church {built at. s-2.cs ena e meee ee eneing 89
DLCAKIM OUI Ofss on ccieiseceeeeeaasectem ster 121 murder of missionary at...............-- 86
HIPS TeleLenCOtO. ces cc cre sis~ tocesen seine 112 See Talaxe.
join in Yamasee uprising. --........-.-- 98,124 | AsAo, BAHIA DE, identification of........... 51
land assigned to, by Bienville. .......... 127 | AsAo, ISLA DE, identification of...........-. 51
language of, an independent dialect. ..... 130 | ASASsI, a synonym for Yamasee....... ae 107
language of, preserved in letter to Charles AsHA-po. See Ashepoo.
OBE age tose donee ananee SedccoeoocoroDer 120 | ASHEPOO TRIBE—
MENON Of see eae eee ee esses 150 included in Cusabo...... Secsecbegeoucse 17
MOvVe tO, Hed RivelssosssaSensenecenecmon 128 land ceded by chief of. .......- Siveteseae 70
On MODie Bayer mses eesnaasioniaaasacecane 128 location! Of9-2. 23 --saaceacennes Seiead ania 62
population of. .........--------2enencce 118, 423 river named from....... occ ceeencdncesara 20
remotely related to Apalachicola......... 130 | AsHirpoo. See Ashepoo.
TOMOV Al Oleesae cates aeene cncetemenaeinete 101 | AsHLEY, LorD, extracts of letters to......... 67,68
return of, to Florida...........-......--- 125 | ASHLEY BARONY, purchased from Coosa
settled near the Mobile............--..-- 127 Tai ans Sieve stare siesta ote Seietoe siete feelin eter 69

eee ee oe ee es a ee ee ar ace te eee 9 Ae a ee

peau ten ad dae They

Aas

>»
ca NP SS

Loan

ern ere'".

“Tao

ail at Mid

e
3
#
%
&
Ea
x
$
i
a
i
=
‘

<£

ba
=

INDEX 465
5 Page Page.

ASHUCK HOOMA, a Chickasaw town.......... 419 | AUT-TOS-SEE, Hawkins’s name for Atasi..... 266

ASILANABI, population of...............--.-- 436 | AVILA, FATHER FRANCISCO DE, attacked by

ASILE. See Assile. UCM ANS Se Seas OEE ce 86, 87

AsoPpo— AWENDAW, name of a town................- 20
WOUALO LOWS = cen ao. -cee uo ene eee 81 | AWHISSIE, perhaps a synonym for Atasi.-... 265
MION OL. - as otiae oo wre daca tmcts Soueeg BAe PARES SUOUCs ceca semcceens tke cce ee cceck acre. 355

Asopo, BAHIA DE, identification of.......... 51 | AXILLE. See Assile.

Asopo, ISLA DE, identification of. ........... 51 | AYACAMALE, a Timucua town.............-.. 324

ASPOACHE. See Espogache. AYAOCUTO, a Timucua town........:....... 324

ASSAHO. See Asao. AYAVILLE, an Apalachee town............... 121

ASsHEPOO. See Ashepoo. AYBE, AYBI. See Yui.

ASIEE, a Timucts townls. 2. 2.<2.0.202-0.%. 324 | AYJICHITI, a synonym for Hitchiti........... 175

ASSIWIKALES, a Shawnee division. .......... 318 | AYLLON, LUCAS VASQUEZ DE—

Assopo, murder of missionaries at........... 86 death ote seamen sate cee sees eee 34
See Asopo. / OxpedilloniOls-. ssc) see sea cee ees caetece 32-34

ASTINA, a Timucua chief...................-. 324 right of settlement obtained by.......... 34

ATAHACHI, &@ Mobile village.................-. 152 route taken by expedition of. ........... 37

ATAP’HALGI, one of the six Fowl towns...... 178 | AyMi. See Insiguanin.

See Attapulgas. AYOTORE, a Timucua town.................. 324

ATAP’HULGA. See Taphulga. Ays. See Ais.

ATASI— AYTOCHUCO, a Guale town.................: 83
a Muskogee division. .............- 215, 265-267 | AYULA, a Guale town.......................- 83
ENS Clign tage eeae Se eee eee eS 265 | BABicKkock, Cusabo name ofa creek........ Re a1)
on Chattahoochee River................. 1s9 | Bactca, an Apalachee town...............--- an ih!
POMUMAMEM Ol nxn, hone ee RO eee woe «oe 432, 435 | BAacKBOooKS—
separated from Tukabahchee............ 254 Cusabo name ofa tribe..--.............- 20
town of, described by Hawkins. -......... 266 derivation of the name..................- 38

ATAUGA. See Autauga. BACKHOOKS. See Backbooks.

ATCHASAPA, &@ Muskogee town............... 283 | BAILEY FAMILY OF ATAsI INDIANS, described

ATCHINA HATCHEE, population of............ 437 by: Hawkins. 1 casts. flee ee 266
See Au-che-nau-hat-che. BALLENAS, BAHIA DE, identification of... ...- 51

ATCINA-ULGA— BAPTISM OF INDIANS. 2.2. 5....--.-.-2 336, 337-338
au ictaskee tOWi 220. =c2k ssee~e ehe.ce 248 | BarcHOo AMINI, Cusabo personalname....... 20
MGNOP eK baere 2. Sates Secs SS 3o 8 23 82: 250 | Barc.ay, Jim, Alabama villagenamed for... 199

ATHORE. See Ayotore. BARNARD, TIMOTHY, settlement of..........- 311

ATINEHE. See Utine. BARNWELL, CAPTAIN, Indian allies of........ 18

AToNIcO. See Antonico. BASKETS—

ATSIKHATA, the original Seminole........... 414 made by Florida Indians. ............... 354

ATTAPULGAS, a Seminole town and tribe... 407,409 made OhTeedS: so2s.cc8 Jee. soe e eee 73
See Atap’halgi. BAxOs, BAHIA DE LOS, identification of...._. 51

AT-TAU-GEE. Sce Autauga. BEAUvFORT, S.C., French colony near........ 335

ATULUTECA, a Timucua town............... $24)|- BECA, a Timucua town. ..:- ..../.<c2.-2. «324

AUBASE, population of. .......652.5.05.0020-8 437 | BECAO, a Timucua town..................... 324

AU-BE-COO-CHE. See Abihka. BEECH CREEK, settlement of Chiaha Indians 407

AU-CHE-NAU-HAT-CHE, & Kealedji village....: 272 | BEvJEsI, a Florida town...........-....... aoe 34
See Atchina hatchee. BELLE, river named by Ribault............. 48

AU-CHE-NAU-UL-GAU. See Atchina-ulga. BELLE Vorr RIVER, identification of........ 51, 52

AUCHEUCAULA, a Muskogee town............ 283 | BELOXIEs. See Biloxis.

AUDUSTA TRIBE— BERDACHES, account of by Le Moyne....... 373
[ater KNOWL aS FGIStOn.... 0c. -c-ances 50 | BrepM4, account by, of De Soto expedition. 154-155
REMBIOM Gos ee Senco ss oc ckaes SEeule 49 | BIENVILLE—

name of, asynonymfor Edistoand Orista 20
AU-EN-DAU-BOO-E. See Awendaw.

AUHOBA, & Muskogee town............-....- 283
AULEDLY, a Tawasa town.........:5.......2. 131
AU-LOT-CHE-WAU, a Seminole town.......... 400
AU-MUC-CUL-LE, a Chiaha village. ........... 169
AU-NET-TE CHAP-CO, a Hilibi village......... 259
AuNIcOON. See Yamiscaron.
AU-PUT-TAU-E, a village of Cussetah.......... 223
AUTAUGA—
BH AIBDAINE TOWN. 2-505 ocean: Sako bse 140,192
described by Hawkins.................. 197
“TENET eget SSE Ce to = a a 200
AUTE, an Apalachee town................. 111, 115
AUTINA. See Utina.

148061°—22—_30

account by, of destruction of Apalachee. 123

land assigned by, to Apalachee.......... 127

punitive expedition of................- 194-195
Bic HAMMOCK, a Seminole settlement. .....- 407
Bic, OKFUSKEE, mention of................- 249
Bic SANDY VILLAGE, occupied by Alabama.. 199
Bic SAWOKLI, described by Hawkins....._.- 142
Bic TOHOME—

POPMlation Ol oon. sec acs oor as net aoe ake 425

probably the true Tohome...-..-........ 164
Bic TULsA, identification of................- 243
BigcUPrALA, mention/Of s-. 6c tes eee 261
Big WETUMPKA, on the Coosa............... 206
BILoxI— ;

WENO Ofes ony. os b sees cece wc cn eeeeert 149

466 INDEX

BimLoxi—Continued. Page. | CALUMET— Page.
MOVE tOWMed RIVED. eeeeies = seeecaseeeeee 128 of peace, Singingiof- 55> -eancceneceeeeee * 193
Willage on Pearl River.--.. se --acsee ose ee 150 presentation: Obsssscescee- ssa ee eee 150

BLACK DRINK— sung at Mobile Rort-ses.seese eee eee 162
DEC WANS iOl. 1 Skeet = eae ene ee eters 394-395 | CALUSA TRIBE—

Ceremony, Of 66 = 3. ccceck seme eem ae cess 313 descriptioniofice 5-025 see 387-388
See Cassine. dominationtof= 3c. - =-..eeeee sees 343

IBLOUNT ay Mloridaichiefos:22.--------aaeee 407 language Of zt2cen snc oe ono eee 28,

Biuacacay, Cusabo personalname.........- 20 location of 2.93 42a5en sees eee eee 28

Buiunt. See Blount. possible connection of, with Choctaw -... 28-30

BOHICKET, a Cusabo place name............- 20 territory claimed by.22-cese.o see eee 180

BOHICOTIS, a Cusabotribes-2. sc-ceeseeeeeeee 68 | CAMACU TRIBE, rebellion of, in 1576.......... - 58

BOISBRILLANT, expedition by, against the CAMACU, CAMAQU. -Sce Escamacu. :

Alabama... 5. Se Sek ee seth cometuisees oe cee 163 | CAMBE, a Cusabo place name...............- 20
BoLtuxas. See Biloxi. CANA-ACKE, derivation of the name......... 405
BOo-CHAW-EE. See Boo-shoo-ee. CANACHEQUI, seeming synonym for Red
Boo-sHOO-EE, Cusabo placename..........-- 20 Ground. 325 cheats Set cee eee eee 197
Boston NEws, account of Yamasee warin.. 98 | CANCGO GOV. DE, submission of Indians to .... 88
BOVOCHE, a Florida town. ..-......-2....-2- 333 | CANJAUDA. See Kan-tcati.

BOWLEGS,'an Oconee'chief=: - = ssseecs-ne aeee 399 | CANNIBALISM, charges of, unjustified... ...... 305

“BREED, THE,’’ nickname for Chickasaw.... 419 | CANOES—

BREED CAaMP— making.of. «0232. eeeeeeee see eee 355
auMuskogee: to wil =--+ see sees se cee 283 of: the; Cusabose.<% <tc osse eee ee eee 75
population: of: -Ss. 2. ace <tc seen eee 436 | CANOGACOLA, a Timucua tribe.............. 324

BROAD RIVER— CANOS, CANOSI—
setilemention:...- sist eke tagansatee tenes 52 account of, by Vandera---.2:.222-.2-2- 219-220
GRbESIONE 2 Bes Sas hoa a ee Soo. ne ee 49 identified as Cofitachequi...-.--........- 56

BROKEN ARROW, population of.........-- 430, 434 synonyin for Kasihtasseeee=-seeee snes 219

BUCKERWOMAN’s TOWN, aSeminoletown.. 407 | CANSIN, a synonym of Couexis............... 53

BUuLL’s Bay, landing of English at..........- 65-66 | Caotira. See Coweta.

IBURTAL (CUSTOMS). ee eaoe see 44, 45, 48, 147, 373-374 | Cap ROMAN, identification of.............. gong

BURIAL GROUND OF THE YAMASEE......... 107 | CAPALA, name of Sapello Sound. ............ 82

BUSHNELL, D. I., jr.— Sce Sapala.
account by, of Coweta people..........-- 226 (CAPAT OEY, a, Timucua chief o2225- 4-se eee 324
discovery of manuscript by.......-.----- 130 | CAPARACA, a Timucua town.............-..- 324

CABEZA DE VACA— CaPE FEAR, French and Spanish names for. 51
account by, of Narvaez expedition..... 144-146 | CAPHATACHAQUES, a synonym for Cofitache-
Apalachee described by.--.......-....- 113-115 QUID sss es se tas ee Sachets ce eae eee 217

CaABISTA, a Florida settlement.........-..... 333 | CAPINANS, CAPINAS, mention of....---.... 149,150

CaBo ROMANO, identification of...........-.. 51 | Capoaca. See Caparaca.

CGACASPADA. See Sacaspada. ~ CaPoLa, an Apalachee town..........-.--..- 111

CACHIPILE, a Timucua town.......-.-....-.-- 324 | CAPON, a Seminole town. -----..--.-5---22-- 400

CACIQUE, name applied to Timucua chiefs by CARABAY. See Sarauahi.

Spaniards 2) s224 2 w.osnn sees eee aeee ees 5 .147]| -CARAGARA, a Calusa ittownl)-seees sess eeeee 331
CACOROY, a Timucua town.........-..---.-- 324 | CARANKOUAS, location of.......-.-.-.---.-.- 205
CACOUGAI, a synonym for Tuskegee........- 208 | CARAPUYAS, settlement near St. Augustine.. 104
CADECHA, a Timucua town...--2::22.-.<-.-- 324 | CaRiBs, attempt to capture, as slaves........ 32
CAHALLI HATCHI, one of the six Fowl CAROLINA SETTLEMENT, Indians join ----- 91,93, 94

TOWNS: 2. ome a denceeiSectee eee ee ee 178 | CAROLINAS,Spanishexploration of coast ofthe. 31-35
CAIALECHE, a synonym for Kealedji.......... 271 | CaRrrosa INDIANS, mention of. ............-- 202
CAKINONPA. See Casqui. CASAPUYAS, a settlement close to St. Augus-
CALABAW. See Catawba. TIME. seeks es ceeced bee eee eee eee eee 340
CALABAY. See Sarauahi. CAsScCANGUE—

CALAHUCHI, an Apalachee town.........--.-- 1il a Gualetowmnss tes. Ses oeee epee 83

CALALEK, perhaps the Kealedji.............- Zi mention Of 3 ee essa Ste. see eios eee 182

CATANYaluimucua town--- ses .-ceeeee eee 324 population! Of c< ease eee ee 337

CATAOBE}.a Calusaitowns-cotheene-le-ceee see 331 referred to asa Guale tribe...-.........-- 321

CALE. See Ocale. See Icafi.

CALIQUEN. See Aguacalecuen. CASISTA, CASISTE, a Lower Creek town (see

CALLAWASSIE, Cusabo name ofan island... -- 20 Feashitia)& scicceeceeriaake emanate 131,218, 221

CALLOBE, an out-settlement of Atasi........- 266] Casrroa,a Calusa town2t=-2--e- = bases eee 331

CALOOSA. See Calusa. CASKEMAMPO. See Casqui.

CALOOSAHATCHE, a Seminole town.....-...-- 400 | CASKIGHI, a synonym for Tuskegee. -.......-- 208

CALOs, a south Florida tribe (synonym of CASKINAMPO. See Casqui.

@alUsa) oe. cas Saacics nem te ee eee oe 342 | CASKINANPAU, on the Tennessee (see Casqui). 214
CALUGA, possibly the Okalusa ........----.. 214 | Cason. See Coosa.

'
j
i

—

~*~

. me-cetal itera i he RA Ae? ovine O ie Bot

INDEX 46 7
Casqui— Page CHAQUETO TRIBE, See Chatot tribe. Page.
at war with the Pacaha.................. 213 | CHARENTE, river named by Ribault........- 48
various synonyms for.............--.---- 213 | CHARLEs V, land taken in name of.......... 34
Casquin. See Casqui. CHARLESTON HARBOR—
CASQUINONPA, on the Tennessee (sce Casqui). 214 Spanish name for-s:ese.0-t5-/--20--56-5- 51
MRDCINE OLIN EINE iis! 3.5 soe co eae se os oe 374-875 tribSs in Vicinity Of ss.9-t soos. =o. ee 67-68
See Black drink. CHASEE, a Yamasee town.................... 97
Cassista. See Kasihta. CHASKPE, probably a part ofthe Shawnee... 296
CassoTty— CHATEAUX, a synonym for Chatot........... 134
CACM NS) ch ctv ss ee ae 214 | CHATELAW, a Chickasaw town............... 419
synonym for Koasati...................- O02) pb CHATOT URIBE”... =e iapewn los P een 134-137
kam. a Timncua Lown-- 5. sais 2s052.055 324 and Chacta, confusion between names of. 135
Castro, ALVARES DE, dean of the cathedral Airs mention/Of--- 2. cs..sn 5 6520s oe 134
(Phd 3 Wisp Ste Ce) FRE Se Pk LR es ye ee 33 language of, distinct from Choctaw...... 136
CATABAS. See Catawba. migration of, toi Mobilejt.=-3-2-4.24-2-4- 136
CATAWBA— > peace made between Apalachee and ...-. 119
at war with the Tuscarora..............- 18 population! Of: -.- nascar soe Pe ese 424
make war on colonists..................- 101 protection of French sought by........-- 123
See Flat Head Indians. settled among Apalachee. ..............- 135
‘CATTOUGUI, a synonym for Tuskegee... ...... 208 settlement of, in Louisiana. ............- 137
Catuco, Cusabo name for fort at Santa Elena, under protection of French.-............- 124
otherwise known as Fort San Marcos. .. - .. 20, 59 warlike Mature Of-eass-oc oe -eace eee 135
CaueHr, garrison left at.-..-.....62.682558 Joc 171 Yuchi concerned in outbreak among..... 299
CAvETtA, a Lower Creek town (see Coweta). 221 | CHATTAHOOCHEE, a Muskogee settlement.... 226
GmUSA a CNSAbO DrINe>. 22. 28a: oi. Belocs 68 | CHATTEAU, a synonym for Chatot..........- 137
See Coosa. CHATUACHE—
CAUWAOULAU, a Muskogee Village........... 283 a Cusabo placename. .....0..2-1..0.2202 21
CavETA, a Lower Creek town (see Co- @ Hloridamission=, s2n-4- 52228 See ee aoe 322
GL) hens See ae es 2 ae: 125,131, 221 synonym for Satuache..........-....22.. 61
CaxA, a Village in Tascaluca province........ 155 |) CHATUFO; a Gualetownes.e. 3--2Ss. 2.032528 81, 82
CayAGNA. See Kiawa. CHATUKCHUFAULA—
CAYAGUA, a synonym of Kiawa.............- 61 aibranchiof Mulsasts sees este ee 245
CAYAGUA, BAHIA DE, identification of....... 51 NOCRIIONY Of patra tsa ase eases eee ee 410
CAYAGUE, CAYAWAH, CAYAWASH, CAYEGUA. CHAVACLEY HATCHIE, Creek name for Half-
See Kiawa. WAY) SUOUSG oracle <iaiseee em ae care ee 245
Cayo. See Cocayo. CHAWASAWS, mention of...............:.--- 150

CAYOMULGI, a Shawnee settlement. ......... 319
See Kayomalgi, Kiamulgatown.
CAVOVEA, 3 Calusa TOWNS «2. ....022<.-052-5~ 331
GAXUCAR yaiCalusa town: ...405 (25322-25225 331
CAVUCO, a Limncua tow. 225 j.2 55 285.522 324
CE£LORON, expedition of, against the Chick-
BRT peace mcinnal toe ote caee ae as. ase Sete 417
CEREMONIES—
aieine OLplanting. 2-25. 22522.. 2.25 32.5 43-44
of Woridaiindians: <0. 2243.4 see s.8. 2. 394-397
CHAAS, settlement of (sce Chiaha).-.-----...- 405
CHACATOS, a synonym for Chatot....... 95,119, 135
CHACHANE, a Muskogee town................ 283
CHACHAUE, population of...................- 435
CHACTA, Name misapplied to the Chatot... 135-136
CHACTOES, mention of (see Chatot tribe) -.... 150
CHA-HAH, a synonym for Chiaha............. 169
CHALAKAGAY, a Shawnee town among the
TBR yet sa an co ne ecw Hein ciate oa ia Sa Ook 319
CITALAQUILICHA, a Lower Creek town (see
Gherokeeleeches) es s5 255 e243) Pe ett 131
CHALLACPAULEY, a branch of Tulsa.......... 245
CHAMINI, a Timucua town............-...... 324
CHANAHUNREGE, a Muskogee village......... 283
CHANANAGI, a Creek town............:..---- 283
CHAOGOULOUX, a town east of Flint River.. 142
CHAOUACHAS, a synonym for Tawasa.......- 139
CMAOUAKALE, a town on the Chattahoochee
Kaee SA WORN) ooo ws oie nced to netesect sec 5 142

CHAOUAKLE, a Lower Creek town (see Saw-
7 ah kg Se Se eR Ree ence eee 143,174

CHAWELATCHIE, evidently Halfway House... 245
CHEARHAW, a body of Upper Creeks (see

Ciiahia) aces oe acaa hes css ae eee eee te 172
CHE-AU-CHOO-CHEE—
a Lower Creek town .....-............-- 174
LOCATION) Of-75 3 5 253 Ja SSea aoe tee eee 175
CHE-AU-HOO-CHEE, a Chiaha settlement...... 170
CHECHESSA. See Chichessee.
CHEEAWOOLE, a synonym for Hotiwahali.... 254
CHEEHAWS, synonym for Chiaha............ 167
CHEESKATALOFA, mention of (see Chiska
CAOLa) Eo jana eee ee see an cee ee eS ee Bee 308
CHEHAW—
a body of Upper Creeks.................- 172
a;Chiaha towiliecomscitecnorsowcc cos Soeee 169
Cusabo name of a river...............-.. 21
See Chiaha.
CHEHAWS, a Seminole tribe (see Chiaha).-.-.-. 409
CHEKIKA, a Calusa chief.-....5.22:....2...- 344
CHERAW TRIBE—
enemies of settlers =...<4... 50 ese ee 100
LOCATION, Of a=... ee resean s Soho se 35
CHEROKEE INDIANS—
aggressions of, on Creek territory........ 253
attack of, on Guale missions............. 90
extent of country of. - 202 Poi eee: 213
war of, with Chickasaw.-................. 419
CHEROKEE LEECHEE, an Apalachicola chief.. 131,
132
CHEROKEELEECHEE, population of (sec

Chalaguilicha) 2 << seccccenerrte ss scan ss eae 435

468 INDEX
Page. Page.
CHESKITALOWAS, a Seminole village and CHIMAUCAYO, a Timucua town. -............- 324
tribe (see Chiska talofa)-............---- 308,409 | CHINicA, a Timucua town....-.........---.- 324

CHEsTOI, O. T. See Chestowee. Curnisca. See Chinica.

CHEsTOWA. See Chestowee. CHINNABY’S FORD =222sdse-csee caesar 284°

CHESTOWEE, a Yuchi town...........-.-.-.- 297° | Curt, ia‘ Calusa town: .s2e.n-cee eek oe eee 331

CHEWALLEE, a synonym for Hotiwahali-.... 256 | CHIQUITO—

CHEW OCKELEEHATCHEE— Indian village near St. Augustine........ 105
name of Kasihta village........-.-.--- 143, 225 synonym for Nombre de Dios.....--..-- 104
namoeof-lulsa branch-—.cenece= eee oe 143,245 | CHIQUOLA, a synonym for Kasihta........... 219
Origin ofmamess cee. caces- ces eee merce a= 143 origin. of themames... sce sse-eeeeee eee 53, 219

CHIAHASINDIANS Hono So acSanocetemenenieee 167-172 | CHIscA—

a, Lower Greek: tribe sh s02 G22 see woe 189 Apalachee expedition against............ 120
among Upper Creeks...........------= 171, 172 influence of,in Spanish-A palachee War... 119
and Coweta, friendship between......... 230 Metltion Of} /..- to soc ace cecs ee eee eee 202
branchyofthesy amaseec. .2-.-ss--e2eeeee 401 name applied to Quizqui.-.............. 293
linguistic classification of. --........--- to 12 name for the Yuchi....... 119, 189, 288, 289, 292
Jocationiol-sscoe cast hace cease eee eee 167 PLOVINCe Of -.. ....2.conseaer seer eee 292-293
populationofss.cesess cs cess eae eee 426,434 | CHISCALAGE, 2 Muskogee town.............. 284
present statusiol-sesess sence enero ee eee 170 | Csi, possibly the Coweta...............-.. 226
probably in Hitchiti group-.-...........- 172 | CuiskA. See Chisca.

settlement of, among Lower Creeks...... 169 | CHISKA TALOFA—

significance of the name. ...............- 167 populationjof.> ste eee eee 435
Uppers popwlationioh-.4-eesseroeeeeeaeee 437 probably the town of the Hogologe ... 308
Wisitiol Desoto LOrccecuscenenceeeeeee ee 170 | CHOCKOLOCKO, population of.............-.- 437
visited by Pardo); s.csests-scoscoeen ese 171 | CHO-CO-NICKLA VILLAGE, a Seminole town... 407

Curasa, a Lower Creek town (see Chiaha).... 13) | CHocTAW INDIANS. ......-...------------- 420-421

CHICACHAS, mention of (see Chickasaw) ... 149, 150 confused with Chatot...........-.-.---.- 136

CHICHESSEE, Cusabo name of a river and in Mloridatets 5. Shicie cient ee eee 28, 345

CLROKc2 = ncicsucce ses J eaeaeed seceacdencauce 21 manner of dressing hair.............-..-- 13

CHICHIMECS, Spanish name for the Yuchi (see peace overtures to, by French........... 161

@hichumecos)=2c6- pene -acecseemeseeeene 294 populationofils24 22 5e ie ase eee 450-455

CHICHOUFKEE, an Upper Creek town.......- 283 possible connection of, with Calusa. ..... 28-30

CHICHUMECOS— with Yamasee, war on colonists.......-- 101
IMAiES OL INTOLMONda ee oseseceoessce see 305 | CHOCTAWHATCHEE Y UCHI—
possibly same as Westo........--.......- 305 in Ploridajs,.ctesencccsee react =-a-eaees 298
Synonymifor Wuchii co. Sc2-cmcce astecce aoe 90 located close to the Tukabahchee.......- 304
See Chuchumecos. CHocTtoUuUH—

CHICKASAWalDHIB H cas c\se nace ane ch eenomeeets 414-420 a. Tawasa tow); <<.ces ces ss sees ee eee 131
allies\ofthe English... 2.5.2...s.ec-ce-e- 415 synonyin for Chatotesee-2-ssseet=sceeee 131
cessions of land!by_—--acas casas eeeeeeeee 420 | CHOHALABOOHHULKA, a Seminole town.....- 411
first noticeiofees sas pe seco sean se aoe 414 | CHOKONOKLA, a Seminole town............-- 411
involved in Creek Confederacy-.-........ 10 | CHOLOCCO LITABIXEE, a Muskogee village.... 284
populatiomofee. es s-e-eoeeeee se = 437, 448-450 | CHOLUPAHA, a Floridatown................. 324
settlements of cee Ste as eee ee 417-419 | CHOOTHLO, a Lower Creek town (see Sawokli). 174
Spaniards attacked by-............-..-.- 415 | CHooTHLOTcHY, a Lower Creek town (see

CHICO, R10 DE, identification of-----........ 36, 51 Sawoklt) ites c.-<ceeiee eee seeee ee eee eee 174

CHICORA, a Cusabo province................- 37 | CHosa. See Alcola.
importance Of-. ..a-pepeee sen see eee tee 47 | CHOWOLLE HATCHE, Hawkins’snamefor Half-
location Of oo. ccmewecaceence seen e Saeeee 47 way House: 232 ..ectscsepaseee nee aee eee 245

CHIcoRA INDIANS, account of, by Peter Mar- CHOWWOKOLOHATCHEE, a Kasihta settlement

VE cjeias« ese Selseiteweecetacsc's cadences eee a2 41 ON... sce sce cn cdag eee tae Lee 2 eee 225

CHIEFS— CHUAHLA, a Muskogee town. ..........------ 284
Creek, speeches Of: .\..-<cieccecccoaen coees 15 | CHUAQUE. See Huaque.
customs! concerning... 06k occa cn nese 371 | CHUAQUIN, 2 Timucua town...........-....- 324
Goeference Paid \tO-,.-2.c....ssessseoeeoes 393, 396 | CHUCALAE. See Chucalagaite.

Hlorida; WOUSSOlvanssceeecanncceeee eee 394 | CHUCALAGAITE, a Guale town........-......- 82
SACTINICH LOS aes oc ota ce ete eee ee 382 | CHUCALATE, See Chucalagaite.

Seminole; listiofsis. see sciaccemetese 411-412 | CHUCALETGATE. See Chucalagaite.

WUMUSUS S170 Of- seas see esses ceeaee= 2 = 46,47 | CHUCALISSA, a Chickasaw town.............. 419

CHIHAQUE, a synonym for Chiaha _.......... 167 | CHUCHUMECOS—

CHIHAW, a band in South Carolina.......... 70 invasion of Guale by English and........ 91

CHIHLAKONINI. See Tcuta’ko-nini. settle near Coweta.........0.2-..------- 307

CHILDREN— See Chichumecos.
training Ofs..ocscchiec ces ss casera 381 | CHUFYTACHYQUE, identification of (sce Ka-
Whippinp Of .5.ccesps.caes eee eee oer 162 SIbtayac sc -ceacendeehesae ee Reese enter eee 217

Carini. See Cilili. CHUKAFALAYA, a Chickasaw town. .......--- 419

CHILUQUES, a Synonym for Cherokee... ...... 20, 90

CHUKAHLAKO, See Tchuko tako.

cdhteDes

th ferme Botting ee a cr. @ ay

area ¥- 54

bat ve

eel Yaa et

INDEX 469
CHU-KU-CHATTA— Page COMBEE, See Combahee. Page
PU BETMITOIO LOWE daw cases nx'nba dees we 407 | COMBEHE, a Cusabo tribe...................- 68
Meaning OfNAME. = 20 cscen xs Saseeseee ean 407 See Combahee.

CuusE, BAy oF. See Ichuse.
CHYAWHAW. See Kiawa.

Cicaca, mention of (see Chickasaw)....-.....- _ 296
CICALE, & ‘Timucua town... .. 2.4. ..<5.-25<-- 325
CIGUACHE. See Siyagueche.
CiscAa— :
references to, by La Salle...............- 296
synonym for Yuchi..... Wee Botte tere 296
CLAN SYSTEM, influence of, on terms of re-
TAUIOHSDS De Se Soo oe at ersee siete ce soe 368-369
CLASSIFICATION OF LINGUISTIC GROUPS. .... - 11-31
CLEWALLA, a synonym for Hotiwahali...... 257.

CLEWAULEYS, a synonym for Hotiwahali... 257
CLOTHING—

Olthe: Apalachee s <1. soscs wees wee eed 112
SGA ECG i ges ae SA eee ee 387
ofmeelorida Indians: S.:--2<--=..c<2..< 391
TGR ECON Mba el SE oe ON eS See 346
CLOWTER, Cusabo personal name. ........-.- 21

CLRICORA. See Chicora.

CLUALE, @ synonym for Hotiwahali........ 257
CoaBA, an Apalache mission............... 323
COACHMAN, WARD, an Alabama Indian ..... 192
Coga, asynonym for Coosa (of Alabama).... 230
Cocao. See Coosa (of South Carolina).

Cocaoyo. Sce Coosa (of South Carolina).
Cogapoy—
LOWINOL Gbback O12 oss cs-cc sake antbel 58
OMI OL MeNtON Of. Goss coco s. eek 37
See Cusabo.
Cocayo, a Cusabo province (see Coosa (of
RULER COLOURS) eniaacccepecssdcscesecess 37
COCHOUTEHY, a synonym for Osochi........-. 166
CocHuTcHy, a synonym for Osochi...... aan 166
Cora, perhaps a form of Coosa.........-..-.- 284
CoFETAZQUE, a synonym for Kasihta.......- 219
CoFITACHEQUI—
identical with Kasihta...............- 216, 218
incation of se || eee oe ee 2s 23) 40, 41, 218-219
Noia UGH LOW » £5is2 ois. Se e2Stiene scl 287
prowince Ola 26. Gers Secssct esa S22 Ssaseke 216
relations of, with Talimeco............-. 168
RU TIME NSO tai oh oe wei ons cere css 216
WIBILOGED UDO SOLO: © 2. ois fee sos ass oe 40, 218

See Kasihta.
CoFoNUFO, name of St. Catherines Sound... — 82

CoFONUFO, BAHIA de, identification of....... 51
COHATCHIE, & Muskogee town...............- 284
ConoTH. See Quohathe. :
COHOWOFOOCHE, a Seminole town........-..-. 411
COILLEGEES, a synonym for Kealedji......... 271
CoLcuniA, a Timucua town..........-.--..-- 325
CoLomas. See Ulumay.

CoLoME, a Lower Creek town (see Kolomi).. 221
COLOMINO, synonym for Kolomi............- 267
CoLucucaiA, a Timucua town............... 325
COLUMBUS, DIEGO, Indians freed by. ......-- 32
ComAcnica, a Calusa town.......5.........-- 331
CoMBAHE, chief of, land ceded by.-.-.--......- 70

See Combahee tribe.
COMBAHEE TRIBE—

BEC USAUO MAMNGs (22S Ss osalk pce Soscue 21
ineluded iniGusabo.: <<< 2..2s<o5.-2-<see 17
EST Ci i ahs eee oe 62

COMBOHE, See Combahee.

COMMUNAL HOUSES. ... 2.0.0 ccccccecceses 48, 74, 353
CONALIGA, an Upper Creek town. .........-. 284
CONCHAC, applied to Abihka Indians-....... 251
CONCHAQUE, evidently the Muskogee. ....... 193
CONCHATTAS, a synonym for Koasati......-- 205
CONCHATYS, a synonym for Koasati........- <1) 203
CONGAREE, Colonists at war with the. ......- 71
“‘CONGEREES,”’ at war with the Tuscarora. . - 18
CoNONOGUAY, a Calusa town. ..............- 331
COOCCOHAPOFE, site of an old town.......... 284
COO-LOO-ME, a synonym for Kolomi........-. 268
Coosa OLD TowN—
an Upper Creek settlement......-....... 189
Mention) Olssas «te asGe Mem aeee s daisc ae woe 241
POPWSLONOl anes sae osess eas = eee 437
COOSA TRIBE (of Alabama)—
a; Muskopee division’: ..: 3.2 s-<<sc= <0 nr 215
described’ by Hawkilis\.-.<.'...-<<2ctccs 241
language spoken by..........-.--.------ 26
populationiofs=— jess. ces Seas ees 430-431, 436
relations of, with Hotiwahali............- 255
COOSA FRIEE (of South Carolina)—
among Catawba. ..---<sascseaataseseco2 71
connection of name of, with Cusabo-. - - .- 16, 21
described by Vandera............-....-- 240
distinguished by their location........-- 25
early reference bO=-s.ces sce ecu nae eesoee 37
English declare war on............------ 68
included-in Cusabo.....<.255 s2s-c2tene a=. 17
location Of. 235. ..-ssess Ses Sates 56, 61
Saleobland | by:= =~ sm<cinuse~ Soe eeeeecere 70
CoosaBoys, mentioned in 1720 --..........-. 71

See Cusabo.
CoosaDA, a mixed settlement (see Koasati). 202
CoosaH. See Coosa (of South Carolina).
COOSAHATCHI, Coo-sAu. See Coosa (of Ala-
bama).

Coo-SAU-DEE, described by Hawkins........ 204
Coosaw. See Coosa (of South Carolina).
CooSAWTEE, synonym for Koasati..........-. 203
CoosoE INDIANS, mentioned in 1716 ........- 71
See Coosa (of South Carolina).
Copper—
mines; report Of-2: 2.2.2 < serena cemence ee 293
Ornaments Of See ete ok Ses ccs awemeeees 350
CORNELLS, ALEXANDER, a Creek chief-....... 281
Corpa, FRIAR PEDRO DE, murder of-......-. 85
CoRROQUE. See Surruque.
CorsApoy, at war with Tuscarora......-...- 18

See Cusabo.
Cosa INDIANS, mention of (see Coosa (of Ala-
AMS) cs ceria eae = Poss oC 3 S06e 202
COSAHUE. See Cusabo.
COSAPUE, murder of missionaries by Indians
Oleic on sae Scouse Steele ioe <a nee 60
See Cusabo.
CosITo, a synonym for Kasihta............-.- 224
CossAPUE. See Cusabo.
Cossoks, tribute exacted from (see Coosa (of

Sot Carolina) -.<o- sacease setae ase a 69
CosTE—

probably Kossati-s. = 4.4.2. ss. ceees Se 201

Spaniarus Qtr 522 Ss se osteo ore Sess 202

470 INDEX
/ Page Page.
COTACHICACH, a Cusabo tribe............-.-- 68 | CrEEKs—Continued.
COTEBAS, a Cusabo place name...........-.- 21 Origin of the nama: sees. ceseecae tee eee 521
CorERO, a Calusaitown=t..--~<cses-eee eee 331 population Of-- pce eae ce eeeee 437-439, 442-448 ©
COTOHAUTUSTENUGGEE, a Lower Creek set- territory. ceded! by s2s-c sec cemeceee es ceaes 16
tlement <2: 59s 2. Se oe See eek 284 tribes know :aS. <. ced deweceaeeecieteee 404
CovAcann, mentionio&ss--cseec os 62 ae ee 143 Upper and Lower, location of.......... 215-216
CoucHATI, Synonym for Koasati..........--- 203 villages of, burned by the Spaniards..... 221
Courxis— war of,in Alabamaze: c-n.e-.esese sees 199
a Gualetown:. 22. = --toaesseeas sae ee ees 81, 82 war of, with Chickasaw-..............--- 420
Identificatiomiobes eer cee ee eee aioe 50 with English, invade Apalachia....... 121-123
LOCATION OL ceme cee acon eee teeter ae 50 Yamasee harrassed by...........---.---- 106
IMentIOM.Of ee tess =F eeeioses eae eee es 84 Yamasee joined by, in war on colonists.. 101
COUSAH OLD FIELDS, mention of ............- 241 |. CRUCES, BAHIA DE LAS, identification of... 51
COUSSAS OLD VILLAGE, mention of-.........-- 241 | Cruz, BAHIA DE LA, identification of-....... 51
Cow TOWNS, mention of ........--.--------- 284 | CuacaTa. See Guacata.
COWASSADA, a Synonym for Koasati......... 204 | CuBIHATCHA, population of................-- 437
COWETA s. cs. csccns cess ongsns austen es 225-230 | CucHtIaGA. See Cuchiyaga.
a Lower Creek tribe.’.....2.....-2. 189,215,225 | CucuryaGa, a Calusa town ..........-.....-- 332
alliance of, with Chiaha.--.-:..........- 168 | CuctyyaGa. See Cuchiyaga.
bands 52sec astosettous hice oeeeieeeae 227-228 | CULAPALA, a Guale town..............--.--- 81
called the bloody town......-......-.--- 132 | CULL-OO0-SAU HAT-CHE, a Seminole town... 400,403
chief, missionaries driven off by. .-..--... 130 See Calusa.
chiefiotf, (described srec-2-5 scene seat 225-226 | CULOPABA. See Culapaba.
described by Hawkins....-.--.-....-. 227-228 | CUMBERLAND ISLAND, French and Spanish
Expedition AgaiNsta=2.<2seseeeseoee eee 180 NAM CS GORE ae neo wee cess se eee eee 51
MEAG Wal TOWN. vise os eaten cose nceeee 133,223 | CURRUQUE. See Surruque.
location’ of:thes-. 5 ..#secc cece esiee sarees 226 | CUSABEES, CUSABES, CUSABOE. See Cusabo.
men tioneds2 Savas eee dese cee eee 174} CUSABO.. ..c2.cc oc ancessc conse cseeteete seer 31-80
population(of: <2 25.2cn2 se s-sce bec 430, 434 allies of whites against the Tuscarora. . . - 70
COWETA TALLAHASSEE— bands of, among the Creeks.............- 71
a Lower Creek town......-.-.--.-------- 174 bands of, join the Catawba ..........-- 71
an out-village of Coweta. ............---- 175 connection of, with Coosa..............-- 16
described by Hawkins........---..-----. 228 CUStOMS Of...<s sanc2 2 ccnceemenee eee noee 76-80
CowETAv. Sec Coweta. described by Hewat -............-.-.---- 72
Cow-E-TUH. See Coweta. different lists of tribes of...............-- 67, 68
COW-E-TUH TAL-LAU-HAS-SEE. See Coweta ethnology of, dependent on documentary
Tallahassee. SOUDCES 5.4500 65225 Stee tec Roe eee 10
COWKEEPER, THE, an Oconee chief......-. 181,399 first appearance of name of. ........--..-- 16
Coy, a Floridaitowiicr. c-ce- daiece ce sees 325 island of Palawana given to........-.-.. 70
CoyoxsrA’ a Caltisaitowit=. «-22sce-2 2-625 oe er 331 name of a tribe and a town.............. 21
CozsEprovincelof.. oeics.ecesceeetosee sete 231 population of. 4.28.5 esos a eee 421
See Coosa (of Alabama). territory, European settlements in....... 31
Cozao— use of name by the English........-..... 16
identification Of-.--+...cs20e. se sseee ee 2 56 words and phrases Of... ...5..s-sc«cecse= 20-23
province visited by Juan Pardo.......... 55 | CUSABO PROVINCES—
See Coosa (of South Carolina). authorities for... 22. c.wsce dacooee eee 36
CRANE, Pror. V. W., on the Yuchi ....-- 288-289, list, Of:. /2 os SSeS ee 36-38
290, 291 | CUSATEES, a Synonym for Koasati..........- 202
CRAVEN, GOV. CHARLES, defeat of Yamasee CuscOWILLA, an Oconee and Seminole
DY bic om sje = necieratincas eon ns sete eee eee 98 TOW o.o.c0s cco saetee Rema neeneeeneee aemeeee 180,400
CREEK CONFEDERACY— CussaH, chief of, land ceded by........---.-- 70
existing at time of De Soto. ..........-.. 257 Sce Coosa (of South Carolina).
jomed by WKWoasatie: 23 S25 e eases 203 | CussATOES, order for trade with............- 217
lands ceded by, to Oglethorpe. .-......-.- 109 Sce Kasihta.
CREEKS— CUS-SE-TUH, a synonym for Kasihta---......- 222
arrival Of il HlOridAsceses +. sone e eee ne es 403 | Cussitaws. See Kasihta.
attack of, on Guale missions.........-.-- 90 | CussoBos. See Cusabo.
attack of, on Yamasee.............-..42- 102 | CussoEs, a Cusabo tribe............-.2..0..6 68
conference of, with Gov. Oglethorpe. -... 15 Sce Coosa (of South Carolina).
distinction between Seminole and....... 404 | Cussoo INDIANS, location of............-.--- 68
GiVvISIONS Oleeeeemecenscec sees aces ese 216 See Coosa (of South Carolina).
jealous Of Yamasceveaecossstecesescecce 101 | Custravul, a Calusa town-..-<-.-.-5-.-ce-< 332
join Yamasee in war on Colonists... .-...-- 98 | CusTEGTyYO, a Florida settlement. .-........-- 333
land claimed by -.cecscaceecscictiesaeeen cl 16 | CustomMs—
misration lesenGOfesseseenaaeeneeee ese 192 of the: CusabOse as oan nes se eee ee eee 76-80
movement of, into Florida peninsula.... 106 social, of Florida Indians.............. 393-397

>
.
1
4
.
Z
4
%
rd
"

INDEX ALY

Page.
DaTHA, the Cusabo name for an island. . .... 21
DatTHaw. See Datha.
DAWFUSKEE, 8 Yamasee town............--- 97
DAwHo, the Cusabo name of ariver.......-.- 21
DEER—
GOMIGARICHMOL Olas sete. Ses ocan eee eee te = 42, 47
BSI Oca a lea aia e 6 alo ses catenin ae Saas Ae 357
DELGADO, FRAY DrEGO, in charge at Talaxe. 89
) DELUGE, tradition ofthe... 2.2..-..c.-ceses 316
DE Luna, DON TRISTAN, colony under...... 159
IDESGCENT, MALLING. . oo aa scccee~-sncce- 399
DE SoTro—
among the Chickasaw.................-- 414
battle of, with Mobile Indians. ........ 151-158
companions of, at Cofitachequi. .......-.. 40
(DEG ye, G 010) OVE 8) es eee ie een a 334
meeting of, with Mobile Indians.......-.- 151
route of, interpretation of...............- 10
Wisic Of, To Apslachee. <.~ acciea<s st oc 115-117
DICKENSON, JONATHAN, narrative of....... 389-390
DISEASE, cure of, by shamans. ..........-. 385-387
PIRAIGA ft HLOTIOS COW. ~ 2 oc. ww cece en aces 325
Doxsoy Sounp, French and Spanish names
OTR pS ie ae EN a ee ee 51
Don DiEG0, chief of Talaxe and Asao....... 84
Don JuAN—
SUMACH ey CHHOl o-oo ae Ses ees- 336
chief of San Pedro, death of............- 337
eademico OL GuHsle. .. <2 2 <2 oo2-- nc a= ne S4
DON JUANILLO, a Guale chief............-.-- 84, 88
DONA MARIA, a Florida chieftainess......... 336
DONNALLYS TOWN, a settlement on Flint
Jil 2 OC ee ge i a ne eee 284

DoONOCHE. See Lonoche.
DUAARHE. See Duhare.
Duacuk. See Duhare.
DvuaHE. See Duhare.

DuHARE—
PCHSAVOPLOVINCO. |. noccc encase ninca case 37
Bccoone GhaunGiaqns Oless 2. ns. ccs-5ce se - = 41
Pea store ni rete Tee ee ee ee 42
RIN OCERUED Ol siete ecteesa sins Saens ce -ieain= 47
ROCHON Olee iene anon sae ea vigens smc lacie 47
tributary provinces of. ._..--....---...-- 42, 47

DUHARHE. See Duhare.
DvuLcE, R10o—

RO CMMUCHION Olsens ser Saco ~ mca ec cone 51

probably the Savannah................. 52,53
DULCHANCHELLIN, a Timucua chief.........- 325
DuvAL, WM. P., on the Mikasuki............ 402
EARTHENWARE, of Florida Indians........-. 354
ECALAMOTOTO, a Timucua town...........-.. 325
Ecuitos, a synonym for Hitchiti............ 405
E-CHUSE-IS-LI-GAU, a Hilibi village........... 259
Ecisa, FRANCISCO FERNANDEZ DE, expedi-

ANG Vey a) fabs es ge nae i Rel Sera ee ae 17
Ecrra, & Timucua chief 6 ..-.......2-5-5- 325
ECLAvUOU, a Timucua town..............-.-- 325
E-cUN-CHATE, Alabama village described by

U2 57 Lhe se Sts ie Se pe 197

See Kan-tcati.
E-CUN-HUT-KE, a synonym for Kan-hatki..... 270
EDELANO, a Timucua town.................- 325
EDISLOH, chieftainess of, land ceded by...... 70
See Edisto.

Epista, EpistaH. See Edisto.

Page
EDISTARE, synonym of Edisto..............- 20
Episto—
SiGosabotribGs =. oes sciecas oe oo clene= 17, 21
Ciel CO Oleic nc seemed ace cans ae 63
later name of Audusta.........-.-...---- 50
LOCHDIONOL Meet sae oe aas tase see ace oe enn 2 60-61
MOMMOU GM ats a cmcek sate peace eee eens 67,68
probable origin of the name............-.. 37
SYMON VMS LOLs s sae serie set aaa t ecase oes 19-20
EpisTo ISLAND, French name for............ 51
Epist0, ISLAND OF THE, plans to purchase... 69
EpIsTtor, Epistou, Epistow. See Edisto.
EESCAMAQU. Sce Escamacu.
EETATULGA, one of the six Fowl towns....-. 178
Erau HavJo, a Tukabahchee chief.......... 281
EKUN-DUTS-KE—
Ar MUSKOPES TOW e0.s onion - cap =o ee cee 284
TOON HeatiON Ole mem eee oo ss ee aa 270
OPW ALON O fate eaters = alain ere eee 437
EL NUEVO, a settlement close to St. Augus-

HINOS sae at howe ek sme ean tees see teas 340
DLAKAY,.9 Calusa tows... ~~ = ------ 332
ELasayY, a Timucua place name.......------ 325
ELANOGUE, a Timucua town........-...---- 325
EASE, & Cusabo tribe .-.-- =. -<- =< s-52--< 68
ELLIck, Kasihta chief,settlement established

lOhesop ecosSce SoU SB BREA aeoeo ech onenedseres 309
ELVAS, FIDALGO OF—

description of Apalachee by ..-.---.---- 116-117
narrative of De Soto expedition by .... 155-159
EMARHETOWN—
a Muskocee;towiiso se sace,<casce esses == 284
DPODUIALON Of. sao esis ental a a -- 4387
EMOLA, 2 Timuqua town......=.-..-.------- 325
Emusas, a Seminoletribe........--.-.------- 409
formerly the Yamasee....-......---..-.-- 109
ENACAPPE. See Enecaque.
ENECAQUE, @ Timucua town.........------- 325
-ENEGUAPE. See Enecaque.
ENEMPA, a Calusa town......-- ee Re 332
ENFRENADO, visited by Juan Pardo..-....--.- 55
ENGLISH, influence of the. ........--...------ 196
E-PE-SAU-GEE, described. ...-..--.---------- 250
See Ipisagi.
EPHIPPICK, 2 Tawasa town......----.------- 131
EQUALE, a Timucua town..-.....--.-.-.....- 325
EREZE, 2 Timucua town ..---.-.-------.---- 325
EscaMAacu—
Cusabo, name ofa tribe..........--....-- 21
name used for Santa Elena Indians... .-- 60
possibly identical with Yamacraw.....-- 18
SyNON Ya OLMACCOUK - 2. one a en 50
(nella icel Gy ries Ltr BONS SORES per near =e 58

Sec Maccou.
EscaMaAQqu, EscAMAQuU, ESCAMATU. See
Escamacu.
Espo. See Espogue.

EsPOGACHE—
a Guale Own: < jes soriek aoe oe tae ete 82
churchibuilt Ste. o. ota s 2 see =e 89
surrender of chief of............---------- 88
EsPoGuE—
QUBIS COW sic ise we ae das acesense te 82
Spanish officials killedin....-...-.---.-- 85
EspoGuE, BAHIA DE, identification of ...---- 51

EspoquE. See Espogue.

472 INDEX
Page. Page,

EsQuEGA, a Timucua chief.............-...- 325 | FLorIDA INDIANS—Continued.

HSTAME a: Calusa town. -..--s:---0----eene => 332 population.ofs- <i s on. eee nee ee eee 439

ESTANTAPACA, & Calusa town.......-.-.----- 332 See Ais, Calusa, Jeaga, Tekesta, Timu-

ESTEGUE, a Calusa town........-.--..------- 332 cua.

ETANTE, a Seminole town.........----------- 412 | FLORIDA MISSIONS—

ETEWAUS. See Etiwaw. declineiofiece.crn-scseo. pace eee ee eee 104

Etrwans. See Etiwaw. INS ROIS SSS Hob Scaneacnenere noaneadcaa. se 322, 323

EtTIwAw— BLUTES, US60fstac=. 0 sesso ee eee ee 356
allies ofthe whites:. 532-6 tee. <a snmn enema 71 | Foop—
imeludediin'Cusaho. ce s- eee seater 17 DGLTICS. 5. swieienotecss sae soem seca 48
location or 1m1670lec~ 2+ =< -emeseneee eee 61 bread ‘of chestnuts---25-- 2. -mesnioer eee 152
merged into surrounding population. -... ra PITTS wos myaletnarelatste ae seater eee ee 46,65
nameota Cusabo tribe:s-5.--s5--seessee" 21 BLARING coos. sacl cee cae ate cee eee 42
possible origin of the name..-..--....---- 38 of Apalachee............ foto. HIDtIS SHEETS 116

ETOCALE. See Ocale. of Calusa indians. 2). see) bees 387, 388

ET0-HUSSE-WAKKES, a Lower Creek or Sem- Of Cusaho: sc .20 Sete eee pe eeseee nee 63,75

INO TOW eco ceta eo eee oes Sue oemee 284, 409 of Florida Indians.............. 358-360, 361-362

ETOTULGA, a Seminole town.....-.---------- 411 of Hobedndians-22-sseee = eee eee ee 392

EUCHEE ANNA, Yuchiname preservedin.... 304 of St. Helena Indians. =. -.-2.---.+-=snces 63, 67

EUCHEE CREEK, Kasihta settlement on... ..- 225 of Sewee Indians! s-2 3. 3.seecsner eee 66

Ev-FA-LAU. See Eufaula. of Damatiindians=4-s40-5eo-- eee eee 182

FD ORAM Teale etic once sot ere Sete erete 260-263 presented to Spaniards................... 54
a division of the Muskogee.... . 174, 189, 215, 262 taboos.s22 3c eee sacs ete eee 383-385
described by Hawkins...............--- 261 | FORKS, a Seminole town.....-.............- 400
ORL SIMO fetes iat et aed cer racine eee 260 | Fort CAROLINE, occupied by the French.... 335
population Of o=--4-eonesasasee ee 432,435,436 | Fort CAtuco, Fort San Marcos knownas... 59
Seminole town made from..........-.-- 400 | Fort TOULOUSE, Tawasa settled near....... 127
See Lower Eufaula, Upper Eufaula. FORTIFICATIONS—

EUFAULA HATCHEE— built by Indian labor... :-s2----se-ssssee 120
described by Hawkins............-..---- 261 indians ini lorid asses aee eee eens 379-380
MopulationlOf-e.cs--ce see eee eee eee 437 | FOSQUICHE, a Guale town.........-.......-.- 82

EUFAULA OLD TOWN, location of.......--.-.- 261 | Four, the sacred number.................-.. 80

Evu-FAU-LAU. See Eufaula. FOWL TOWNS— |.

EU-FAU-LAU-HAT-CHE. Sce Eufaula hatchee. List Of Joo. ccec esas s seen sse renee seer 178

EUHARLEE, acorruption of Eufaula. ....-...- 261 Seminole settlements. ...........-....... 409

Evu-Ta-Lau. See Eufaula. FHOwus; domestication 0f-2-2-5--.-.ces essen 42

Eutaw. See Etiwaw. FRANCISCANS, missionary work of...........- 85

EXANGUE, a Timucua town. ......-..---.--- 325 | FRANCISO OF CHICORA—

HE XCURUMAVOalISatOWl-) =a sstceeee eee ae 332 account of Indians obtained from........ 41

WA CE SPAINTIN Got oe Cae ae tence wep seine ao Messe 352 interpreter for Ayllon...:............-..- 34

Rangum. SéeMalquiche.ae---2s-0ss-2e4e4 5 83 tales related!by. 2 sc.2.c ccc scccen ester 36

FALQUICHE, a Guale town.-......--..------. 83 | FRENCH, THE—

AMINE CEN GUARE CSc. cna anar encase ae . 87-88 attempts of, to colonize the Carolinas and

FASQuE. See Fosquiche. Bloridasscjocsfeetee snes sceee sence eee 48-53

FEASTS— settlement of, destroyed by Menendez.... 335
ofthe 'Cusaho!e 5s. -nssesseaesceseis ose 79-80 | FRESH WATER PROVINCE, population of..... 337
preparations fore os cases oeees-eaeeeeeoce 376 | FRUITS FOUND AT PoRT ROYAL............. 65

FEATHERS, use of— : WUEL a Guale Chieie-e-see> sec segs eee 82
byMloridaindians-- senses emcees aces 351 | FULEMMys Town, a Seminole town....-.-..-.. 407
imvdress! ace seiscecenicsees Sie Fe ie te tae 347 | FuLo. See Yfulo.

FEATHERWORK, house hung with..........-. 7. FULOPLATA, ai Gualetowilsns 2-2 -sceaeeeeee 83

FENCED-IN-VILLAGE, Alabama village in Furs, of unusual quality.-.............. 145, 147, 148

PORES Ae 2053556 ae sea eee ease eee wos 7199)! NUS-HATCHEE 22.2 oa ccer cae ten eee eee eee 269

FIFE’S VILLAGE, an Upper Creek village....... 284 description Ofss- canes == oe eee eee eee 269

FILACHE, a Timucua town............-. toes te WS D1 element among the Seminole.....-......-. 403

FIN’HALUI, a Lower Creeksettlement......... 284 population) of- ><. ccs ccs - eee eee 435

HISHING pmeunOdS OL 2.-)--\-2een cause ee 357,392 | FUSHATCUTCI, an Okfuskee chief............. 247

Tish PonpD INDIANS, name applied to GALE. See Guale.

OkCh alee eect mets sien tee eee oe 275,276 | GAME—
HISHPOND {00 WINS res to sone ee «nee cick eaten 201 abundance Of: 22.22. -. «22 set sees haseeee 74
FLAT HEAD INDIANS, Shawnee town taken in Louisiana: tcc..sccs- nce eenee see 205
10) Pe ane S525 acreriee Seinen eit 317-318 Preservahlon OL-s-2h< ec cen see eee eee 358
See Catawba. superstitions concerning........-......... 384

FLoripA, Spanish conquest of............... 335 | GAMES—

IBELORIDAGINDIANS to-4)5./0 ete ee eee 320-398 DOI]. Ue siciccecesinwessneeene sn eemeeeees 43
DSpPtisM Ofsecce 5 4s cence meRe ene er ee 337-338 of Florida Indigns-2-.-- -ce- eesti 381
ethnology of, dependent on documentary GARAY, FRANCISCO DE, expedition of.......- 334

SOURCES 2c <pieeeseiieis tetera saci Mosiie 10 | GARCILASSO, description of Apalachee by.. 117-118

nxcigdeas Seine RR iE fee

ya Shee

INDEX 473

Page. Page,

GARONNE, river named by Ribault.........- 48 | GUALE, ISLA DE, identification of...........- 51
GEAGA, a Florida settlement......-.....-.--- 333 | GUALEQUINI—

See Jeaga. Bahia de, identification of............... 51

GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES from St. Augustine Isla de, identification of.................. 51

NE PLL ee epg Se ee eae 51 | GUANIN. See Insiguanin.

GERMANY, JAMES, an Indian trader........-. 267 | GUARUNGUBE, a Calusa town................ 332
GHUACLAHATCHE, Bartram’s name for Half- GUATUTIMA, a Timucua personal name...... 325

RELY SLUNINGEE sean chloe Send weet an ao 245 | GUEGA. See Jeaga.

GIRONDE, river named by Ribault....-.....- 48) | GUEVE, & Caltisa towil-.2425.-...5--<U-=-5- 332
GITASEE, name for the Kasihta.........-.---- 222 | GUIOMAEZ—

GOALE. See Guale. possibly the Wimbee................--.- 56, 62
POLO OUnU ITY MOTOS. - os... 5< ove te wom @ 349 visited by Juan. Pardo... 2... .:c.s0a-5<-e 55
GOMARA, narrative of, copies that of Peter HABIQUACHE, a Muskogee village...........- 284

REND ee eso ln Sa an Meelenia mn salen 41) || CELAIR, DRESSING. 22 a.a% sce anew o ccietc 72, 73, 347, 391
GORDILLO, FRANCISCO, in command of Ay- HALBERT, H. S., information from........... 136

DIREC Mere ne akin bsdes acca es —hi5 32 | HALFwAy Hovsg, a Tulsa village........... 245
GOURGUES, DOMINIQUE DE, expeditionunder. 335 | HALIMACANI, RIVIERE, identification of...._. 51, 52
GOWALEGE, probably the Kealedji........... 271 See Alimacani.

GRAIN, CHITVAlOn Of- oo ~ oer cep cec ewe ceo - 42 | HALMACANIR. See Alimacani.............-. 323
GRANARIES AND STOREHOUSES.........-..- 360-361 | HAMASTE, an Apalachee town.......-.-..--. 127
GRANDE, river named by Ribault............ 48 | Hapatuya. See Apalu.

GRAVIER, FATHER, meeting of, with the HARPAHA. See Arapaja.

ODT oa cee cane enicnivceecaese co veses 297 | HATCHCALAMOCHA, a Seminole town......... 411
GREAT HAMMOCK, a Seminole town.......-- 400 | HAT-CHE-CHUB-BAU, a Synonym for Hatchee
GREAT ISLAND, a Seminole town...........- 400 CCAD as ete eee ore wee ee aoe ae 272
GREAT WASSAW ISLAND, French name for. . . 51 | HATCHEE TCABA—

GREEN PEACH WAR, Wiwohka responsible sekealodjivillare: i350 02. eee =a oase 272

pine Sees Ba = SAE Se ey a eee 270-271 a Sawoklt branch: 5.2. ):5.s6eese seo 5 143
GaP Ara CUSRDO WING. ...ce0csecscccessa==5 67 popilationiolgc2ss cases =e eos sae 435
GvAcAIA, province mentioned by Peter Hayz. See Ais.

PA BVI enn ate ooo G co.cc aimevcscamcshecct 43 | HELIOCOPILE, a Timucua chief--............- 325

See Guacaya. HELMACAPE, a Timucua chief.............-- 325
GuacaRA, a Timucua town.................. 325 | HEMALO, Cusabo name ofa chief.......-.... 21
GuacaTA, a Florida tribe and town......-.- 331,333 | HEMANHTE TOWN, a Muskogee town......-- 284:

See Santa Lucia. HENHENGUEPA, a Calusa town.-...........-- 332
GuaAcaYA, a Cusabo province...............- 37 | HEsPoGuUE. See Espogue.

Guacgoco, a Timucua town. ............-...- 325 | Herwrt, J. N. B., on Rickohockans........- 291
GUALDAPE— Haexr.) See Hieks, Johns. 2.0 c= <0ss- aces pe 401

8 Gusabo place name: <-< oo50c5- 2.025. - 21 | HIAMASE INDIAN BAPTIZED AT MOBILE....-- 106

people of, described by Oviedo........-.. 47-48 | HIAMONEE, a Seminole town............-.-- 411

possibly a form of Guale..............--- 84 | HICACHIRICO, a Timucua town..............- 325
GUALDAPE RIVER— HICH-A-PUE-SUSSE, a Seminole town.......-. 407

LOGARION Olesen te eacce a socsc che ace == 35,3841 | HickKAUHAUGAU—

probably the present Savannah.......... 40 SY NOM yatOrs WiestOs=-exm- 2s ~csne =e esos 306

settlement on....... elena e lana ea 34 variant of Rickohockans.............--.- 292
GUALDAQUINI, name of Jeky IIsland......... 41 | Hickory GROUND, descended from Coosa.... 242
GUALE— Hicks, JOHN, a Mikasuki chief...........-. 401, 402

abandonment of...... oe RLS Spee 91,93 | HicH Loa, a Yuchi village.................- 311

Bie WARE WAN OTISCH 2m cece on ome eine ae 53-54 | HIHAJE, a Hitchiti village................-.- 178

PIM AMES Glo cscs s sacs... eben so a5 5 52-5 SOT WIEMIIBY< = tose aciec sete oases ose aac 258-260

PUPCHT UAT ee oan. Own ce asics oe as 89 a Muskogee division...............------ 215

disappearance of the name....-.........- 94 described by Hawkins...............-..- ee 259

grammar written by Spanish missionaries. 18,85 Onigimtraditiom Of... . . co. ses cleo opie 258

language spoken by Indians of Santa POPUISWON! Ofens aeoc anes ee a2 wee eas 432, 436

LO) SS eee 19 | Hii, CoL. EpwaRD, cashiered .............- 295

linguistic classification of........-......-- 15 | HILL-AU-BEE, Hawkins’s name for Hilibi.... 259

merged with the Yamasee...........-...- 80 | HmToN HEAD ISLAND, French name for..... 51

name of St. Catherines Island...........- 41 | Hitton, Witt1AM, Commander of English

TERE WU eae SRE Bee 81 GX POGICLOB WMG =.= sc neta a sca esee = 62

ESHER eee aia ita cas unc ae aiecs s <a=-'s's 15 | HINAFASQUE, a Guale town.................- 83

PODUIGSICM Ols- wey nce nasaciee cnet mace esn-- 422 | Hiocats, a Timucua name..-............-.-.- 325

MOWONG Oley ecn sec cas notte coscnscaite ses scss 15,58 | HIT-CHE-TEE, a synonym for Hitchiti......-.- 177

Spanish officer killed in.............-..-- 85 | HIT-CHE-TOO-CHE, a branch village of Hit-

towns, burned by the Spaniards. ........ 88 CNitie ce. cases seats cade ssnenemee eer 177

ROWS MNCHUORLOL 2: csc dae tasin anna cecams SIS UTCHIT gan cn atincace ses oncuaseer satsn esac 172-178

ISIC. COV. LDAITS LO pasccaceccdencs Sones 89 a Lower Creek tribe and town......... 174,189

visit of Menéndez to.................-..-- 53-55 connection of Yamasee with............. 95

474 INDEX

Hitcniti—Continued. Page Huaq. See Huaque. Page.
derivation of the namé.................-- 172 | HUAQUE, a Cusabo province. ................ 37
described by Hawkins.-.............---- 177) | EOWARA,/a Timucua towne: <2. eeer see aeee 326
histoty/Ofsct. ose eee eee eee 175-178 | HUGHCHEE, a synonym for Yuchi..-........ 288
inthe GreeksNaiions. essen ae eee 178 | HuGHEs, murder of, by Tohome............. 164
in the Seminole Nation.............--.-- 178 | HuGuENOTS—
ofiginanythiof=--tssse 5. e=-Saeee enon 173 established among Cusabo. ..-. Bet Ss 18
population Ofveseeseee-- eee eee ES 426, 434 @xpeditlons/Of - jae csc ae eae ene 48-53
Sawokli united with.--...-.......-...... 143 settlement of Florida by.....---.-..-...- 335
Seminole town made from........--.---- 400 | HuIstacHuco,a synonym for San Lorengo de
square ground of, near Keokuk Falls.... 413 Yibithachucui: jc sesess. ose eoeee eee 112
tribes speaking language of.........-...- 125130 }/|| MELUNWING =. so. sen as setae eee ce eee eee eee 74

HITcIsIHoGI, a synonym for Tohtogagi.....-- 248 CUSTOMS. eee eseee ane Seencistecenee 384

HiITHA, a province mentioned by Peter Martyr 42 ofvalligatorss=-2scc sc cce ee eee 358
See Yta. Otldeer: : 5. sea- cee fae Sere ose 357

HLANUDSHIAPALA. See Thla-noo-che au- HURRIPACUXI. See Orriparacogi. ;

bau-lau. HuspaAw, a Yamasee town.................-- 97
Hoscaw Point, a Cusabo place name. ...--- 21 | IAMACOS, a synonym for Yamasee........... — 96
Hope— TAMAsk, a synonym for Yamasee......_..... 107

identified asWiedza--scccceteatccecccee- oe 390 | IBARRA, GOV. PEDRO DE—
Indians of, described by Dickenson... . 390-398 expeditioniofz.. oo ..8e cos cone aoe 19

HOCAnSIE a) GualetoOwlie. ce eccses eneeee cas 83 ¢ journey, Of--<~ ce aeceece- ee eee. ee eee 14

Hoa LoGEE— VISIt of, to coast sindians=. =: == ese seee 59, 81, 89
a synonym for Hogologe...:............- 190 | Ipr. See Yui.
an abbreviation of Tohogalega......-...-- 288 | Ica¥FI, a Timucua province.............. 83, 321, 326

Hoe RANGE, traders’ name for Suka-ispo’ga. 248 | Icarul. See Icafi.

HoOGOLOGE— Icasqui. See Casqui.

Sey nehi ban Geass. eae eee eee eee 190,308 | IcuHIsI, possibly the Coweta.................- 226
an abbreviation of Tohogalega.........-- 288 | IcHUSE, BAY OF, colony established on..... 147
identifiediassYuchites s-scseer see cane ae 189,289 | ICKABEE, a Cusabo place name.........-..-.. 22

HOGUE OHOTEHANNA, & synonym for Okiti- ICKERBY. See Ickabee.

VACAMIER TE pees tenes serosa acceeomee ee 143 | IcosaNs, the Cusabo name ofa tribe...--...- 22
HO-ITH-LE-WAUL-LEE, a Synonym for Hoti- IDOLS—

Wallin Lite. s4l ee ae Saal enenmeie SS ae eee 2 257 Ineplantine:Ceremonies=--eens—eenee eee 43
HOtr-TAIGA, an Okfuskee settlement.......-- 249 Worshiplol. ico cemcm ese ete ee eee 382
RET OZ WATIAIE TC as a A ee eee ve eee 254-258 | IxAN ATCHAKA, a Creek settlement.......... 285

a war town of the Upper Creeks... .....-- 254 | IKAN-HATKI, a synonym for Kan-hatki......- 269

described by Hawkins.-............-..-: 257 | ILApi, possibly a synonym for Hilibi.......-- 258

Meaning Of LHe NAMEL- pense sec eee sess 254 | ILCOMBE—

POpPUlahloMioiteeaece eee e re cee eee 432, 435 a Yamasee LOWDs..c.sceb oe scasee eee 97

prominent among the Tallapoosa River an Apalachee tOwil=.c aecase se eee eee 111
Creeks ere eet. ena Cee ees eee 240 | ILLAHATCHEE, probably an Okfuskee town.. 249

Howpaos. See Pahoc. Itwans. See Etiwaw.

Homoioa, HomMoLona, Homotcus. See Im-MOOK-FAU. See Imulkfa.

Moloa. IMMORTALITY, beliefin................- 44, 374, 385
HOOK-CHOIE, a synonym for Okchai........- 275 | IMuKFA—

HOOK-CHOIE-00-CHE, described by Hawkins. 201 deseribeds.c 2s 2s- asa etee eo eee 250

Hooks, the Cusabo name of a tribe........_- 22 united with Suka-ispo’ga....-.-.......-. 248

HOOSEcHE, Bartram’s name for Osochi....-. 166 | INTAHICA, an Apalachee town..........-...-. lll

HORRUQUE. See Surruque. See Iviahica.

Hostaqua— INIAHICO, a Synonym for Iniahica....--.-..-. lil
auEimuctalprovancesen tees eserar cere 325 | INNA, a Cusabo personal name.............-- 22
Location Of. 2 ee ase Serre econ 321 | INSIGUANIN—

HOTALGIHUYANA— aiCusabo provinces. .+- 2-7-5 eee eee 37
POPUlation Os ss. che cenceeee Gece e eee 426 Location Of. - cc stencecep ee sna e eee ee 47
settled by Osochi and Chiaha....._.....- 167 tradition of tailed menin................ 43

HOUSED Se eceeeceen 48, 62, 64, 72, 74, 352-353, 391, 394 | IN-TUCH-CUL-GAU, a Yuchi village........... 310

Houstaqua. See Hostaqua. INZIGNANIN, INZIGUANIN. See Insiguanin.

HovutTcuis, a synonym for Yuchi............. 405 | Ipisaai, an Okfuskee branch village......... - 248

Hoya— Isaw, 2 Cusabotribe= 3-0. socccemce se w egies 68
aiCasaboplacemame!ss.. soaceeen cee eee 20,22 | IsHpow, a Cusabo tribe...........-.......... 67
chief of South @arolina=ss-..o2.c.ece sce 19 See Ashepoo.
tribe; locatiomOleepeessacce season Seeeee 49 | ISLANDSNAMEDBY RIBAULT, identification of. 51
tribute levied Onis: 3-2 scos ss sede ete eee 58 | IspocoGA, a synonym for Creek.............. 140
where name is found*-.csecess scceeee seer 50 | IspoKoal, ceremonial t tle for Tukabahchee.. 277
See Oya. IsTAPOGA, an Upper Creek settlement....... 285

‘

Oe a

a aS

INDEX 475

Iswa. See Ushery. Page. | KAstata—Continued. Page.

ITAHASIWAKI. See Eto-husse-wakkes. deseription: off. is c2-2 seco: 224

ITARAHOLATA, a Timucua town.............- 326 expedition against. 22-22 2222. 2.2.00.22.. 180

ITAWANS, mentioned in 1716...............-. 76 friendship of, with Chickasaw........... 419
See Etiwaw. head peace towil-a02-.24.. 1 BE eS 133, 225

ITPAVANS; a Cusabo tribe...2..2..2.22.2...% 68 on the Chattahooche..................- 221-222
See Etiwaw. Peace withsccsen<~eees a eee 217

ITTaWwANs. See Etiwaw. populationof. S252 ss cee ee 429-430, 434

ieoanen Cusaho tribe.fs20-6 20. oe, 67 settlements, listof... 2.225. 0n eee 225
See Etiwaw. similarity in language of, with Kiawa.... 25

TEWAN, @ Cusabo tribe. 5.58.22 ke so. tee 68 Sifeseccupied DY .c% cbs sce eneeeen ee 220
See Etiwaw. KASKINAMPO—

Ivy. See Yui. a tribe on the Tennessee..............--- 213

IvIAHICA— possibly the Tukabahchee..............- 279
anes nalnches town == 5.25022 2.2 os se csc 118 See Casqui.

Synonym for Iniahiea: -: .. 2.22. -. 2... 111 | KASKINSBA, KASQUINANIPO. See Casqui.

IviITAcHUCO— KAWAIGI—
anApalachesitowns 21. 0.22 slo. d 117 aSaywokir offshoots<: st2:5.-22 1.22 ee eee 175
synonym for San Loreneode Ybithachucu 112 a synonym of Okawaigi.................. 143

JANAR— Kawita. See Coweta.

PIC AIDLOWdlss cosakecccckedctescoteccece 332 | KAYAWAGH, KAyawaH. See Kiawa.
an east coast Florida settlement. ........ 333 | KAYOMALGI, an Abihka town............... 254

JASKAGES, a Tuskegee town...........------ 210 See Cayomulgi, Kiamulgatown.

JEAGA— ICRATEDIDe a. «Josh sacs ene See eee ee 271-272
a Florida tribe and settlement........- 331,333 a branch of Tukabahchee................ 271
information concerning................ 389-398 a Muskogee division=......../........-.- 190
See Hobe. described by Hawkins................... 272

JECE, identified as Ais.................------ 390 MMASSACLOMUe sao se = steers oa Noes 246

JEKYL ISLAND— : populationyofi=ss4s2 242 ese 433, 436
Garkyaiame of: fase fe. Shee 41 separated from Tukabahchee...........- 254
French and Spanish names for.........-- 51 | Keawaw. See Kiawa.

JoHAssA, a Cusabo place name.............-- 22 | KEHATCHES, a Muskogee town....-.......--- 285

Joun Hicks Town, a Seminole town........ 407 | KEROFF, a Creek settlement................- 285

JORDAN RIVER— KEYAWAH, a Cusabo tribe. --.2.:-.2-.-.2...- 67
identified as Santee...............------- 35 See Kiawa.
location of...............------------- 35, 41,52 | KEYwWaHAH, Krywaw. See Kiawa.

Maminprofes sett ee ee 34 | KI-A-LI-JEE, Hawkins’s name for Kealedji... 272

Toi # Oalusa towne. <2 -i.2 2 sec2 over 332 | KIAMULGATOWN—

JUESTOCOBAGA a Calusa town..........----- 332 evidently Cayomulgi.................-.. 319

JuMPER— inhabitants Of Si l22~ oak. sc)e seca 418
a@hemimolelender)=: toe. eos! te 412 population! Of! 22a. hese ane- sas eae 436
UGS CNL) SS = oe ae ae 107 | Krawa—

JuRAYA, & Florida rancheria................. 326 ai GUSADOLLTIDC Rea esa e an sae ee 17, 22

PEON, @ Calusatown= 22. 30. .ceo cent ons. 332 first permanent settlement at............ 67

Kaaway. See Kiawa. pranijofiand' tolsc2ae..s5: cn neseer ee nee 25

KACHETAS, 2 Lower Creek town............. 174 Indian name of Charleston Harbor....... 65

KAKIGUE a form of the name Tuskegee... .... 208 LOCaHLONTODS INEGTOs aaa nee a eee enone 61

KAKINONBA. See Casqui. possibly a branch of the Chiaha.......... 25

KALALEKIS, possibly a synonym for Kealedji. 271 remnant of, merged in surrounding popu-

KANaA’KI, @ Florida warrior --............... 405 LatiOMe OSES cece ees 71

KAN-HATEI..... sccong sh cesta eabesAse 269-270 tribes surrounding English colony at... . 67
not occupied by Shawnee...............- 319 | KiawaH, mentioned in 1717................- 71
FH PINAMOW Olcregacenseacaaccs tas se2ecck 3 435 See Kiawa.

KAN-TCATI— KIAWAWS! aCusaDO.UtDe...e ce -tcee eee! 68
a branch town of the Abihka............. 253 See Kiawa.
FOPMIMMOWMOltosescs.c5ccc-czes- 3-02 Ste 436) || WRIA WAY, a CuSabo tribe: <--- cc es0cccecs enc 68

Kan-tcaTi (Alabama), an Upper Creek See Kiawa.

GELDO' S275 2= > aaa agee Aca ease eae 189 | KiAwHAS. See Kiawa.
penGor invWlonds=2.2220-e2s- =o. 198 | KiNG HEIJAH’s, a Seminole town............ 407
element among the Seminole...........- 403 | KING PAYNE, an Oconee chief............... 399

Kaouiras, a Lower Creek town............. 174 | KispoGoai, resemblance of the word to Spo-

See Coweta. PORTS 33 SO EE fee occa tm aeincce sec c wets 277

KARKINONPOLS. See Casqui. KispokoTHa. See Kispogogi.

IARTHIPA) Josseseee eco eae ce Antic reece tee 216-225 | KissaH. See Coosa (of South Carolina).

a Lower Creek tribe....... ene teins 189 | KiTcOoPATAKI—
a Muskogee division ....................- 215 SEND ieva Aes can sowsccalse eee tetas emas 260
appearance of, as Cofitachequi........... 216 population of.......... Sdstecststateossse 436

described by Hawkins................ 222-224

KrwaHa. See Kiawa.

476 INDEX
Page. Page.

IKOASATY INDIANS): ns cscs «aqee=s== == 201-207 | ‘LANUDSHI APALA. See Thla-noo-che au-

an Upper Creek tribe........--.--------- 189 bau-lau.

join Creek Confederacy .....------------- 203 | LAPLAKO—

language Ole ese sees epee eee 205 a branch of Hotiwahali ..........---.--- 257

miuprations Of} =. cece sees seeen senna 198, 205 population: of: 228. sencinsacce nesses 435

on the Tennessee. ......-.----.---------- 211 | LascaNGuE. See Cascangue.

DOPUIALON Olesen == secre = eee 205,437 | LATCHIVUE—

Telatea tO Ala baMar soe. =o es eee 201 @ Seminole Dand =<...) dete see ciciee area 404

TEMOV Al Of- oe see seeking hee eee 203 miscopying of Alachua.........-.-------- 404

southern settlement of......-.----------- 203 | LAUDONNIERE, expedition under.........--- 335

two branches) 0f-cas- <. ese saeco ee anceeee 201 | LAWSON, JOHN, journey of..............----- 17
KOHAMUTKIKATSKA, a branch of Okfuskee... 249 | LE MOyYNE, errors in drawings of...-.-..---- 345
KOLOMMe 25. c< chistes oe ca seeeen tee pansies 267-269 | LES GRANDS OEFASQUE, an Okfuskee town.. 246

a Muskogee division .........---..------- 215 See Okfuskee.

described by Bartram. ..........-..----- 267 | Lewis, JACKSON—

described by Hawkins.........-..-...--- 268 a modern Creek Indian..............----- 264

element among the Seminole. .......--.- 403 informant 245222 oon coe eee 401, 403

Location Ofeeaem access sace esac soeene 267 | ErKatcKa, a Coweta town........---.------- 229

on Chattahoochee River........-.------- 189 | LimaMu, village mentioned by Ranjel....-... 192

Popul alOmOle nee eames =a seeee eR ese ee 432,435 | LiraratcHi, an Upper Creek town......-.--- 285
K00-A-SAH-TE, a Synonym for Koasati....... 203 | LirterutcHi. See Litafatchi.............--- 285
Koosau, mention of, by Adair.......-...-.- 240 | LirTLe Hire, mention of..........-.------- 259

See Coosa (of Alabama). LitTLE OAKcHOyYs, a part of the Alabama... 197

KorsABol. See Cusabo.

KustaH. See Coosa (of South Carolina).

KussETAU, a Lower Creek town..........--- 174
See Kasihta.

Kusso. See Coosa (of South Carolina).

KussoEs, a Cusabo tribe..............-....- 68
See Coosa (of South Carolina). f
JeuSssOo;a Cusabotribeias =socceeeessceceee 67

See Coosa (of South Carolina).
KYAwaw, KyEwaw, Kywana. See Kiawa.

Kywaws, king of, given grant of land....... 71
See Kiawa.
La CONCEPCION DE APALACHE........-...- 110, 323

La Costa, a settlement near St. Augustine. 105, 340
La Punta, an Indian village near St. Augus-

LTO Seetale alate sists afeie tieisisie ceisieiniaseisiae ie inion ae 105
LABOR—
compulsory, on Spanish fortifications.... 120
GivislOnOl-ceesesace Ropsass6secSacebensos 373
ACA, aulimiucua OW sc. .s.secc- ec esensecre 326
BALOGALGA—
an Okchai settlement...........-.-..---- 275
described by Hawkins-.......-.........- 276
population Ofa- feces .ce-se eee ee eee 436
revival onthbemame eset. eee eee 276
DAMALE, a Timucua town...........-.------ 326
LAMECO, a name for Chiaha.............-...- 167
TsAMHATTY, account Of.........0..---0------s 130
LANGUAGE—
An alachOO: ..sccscacteces sseaenbaerestmes 120
classification according to.-........--.-.- 11
mutually intelligible to certain tribes.... 191
Naniaba, closely allied to Choctaw---..... 165
ORPHOMCORSAEL So cic va creocs orice nicer a 205
of the Natchez......... Saab ooede: SaSeser 314
ofthe: Texas rAlapama:..-0 6. csecscaene 199
Of thevDUSKCPCO rar. conic ctiecaciscceisisins 207-208
Of SURO SYM C ha reese a ania «one 287, 309
Tawasa, related to Alabama............. 140
Timucua, spoken by Osochi...........-- 165
Timucua, works of Parejain............. 337
Tohome, closely allied to Choctaw....... 165

Lano. See Edelano.

LITTLE SAWOKLI, described by Hawkins... 142,175
LITTLE TOHOME—

population Ofj2—sseeeeeee sees ee ee eee 425
probably the Naniaba..........--.------ 164
LittLE TuLsa, the seat of Alexander McGil-
livrayeccccscececchece ce sastavsoneetesseees 242
LITTLE UFALA, mention of.............-.--- 261
Sce Eufaula.
LITTLE WETUMPKA, on the Coosa....-.-.-.- 206
LIZARDS; Gating) Ofsccnseiee cece seae es een 359
LLAMAPAS, miscopying of word for Yamasee. 96, 100
LOACHAPOKA, mention of...........------+-- 246
Sec Lutcapoga.
LOCHCHIOCHA, a Seminole town........--.-- 411
Loa@uaALE. See Equale.
LOKSACHUMPA, a Seminole town........-..-- 412
Lone KiNG, an Oconee chief ...........--.-- 399
LONOCHE, 8 Guale Indian. --- 5-2 2-2-2 == 83
Lopez, FRAY BALTAZAR—
letters Of2. 2.2. sce tees comes eee eee 337
missionary at San Pedro............-..-- 89
reference t0:- ose nase ae eee ee ee 15
LOUISIANA, establishment of colony of....-.. 159

LOWER CREEKS—
attack of, on San Carlos de los Chacatos. 135

called Cowetae-ccec.tees cccecseeeeeeecees 225
expedition of, against Yamasee.........- 103
list of tribes 235.2 csse~ccs cane ene ecco 189
location: of: 32..2t2adacaactoeeseSmctieeene ee 216
of Bartram, really Seminole. .-.........- 134
peace made between Apalacheeand.-... 119
rémoval of 5... 2542-6 =< eee ee cee 101
towns Of: 0.502.208 nc: kG. ce es en eee 131
LOWER EUFAULA, population of.-...-....... 435
LOWER YUFALE, where located........... enn 26 il
See Lower Eufaula.
LOW-WALTA VILLAGE, a Seminoletown..... 406
Luca, a Timucua town.............. weesees 326
LUNA, TRISTAN DE, expedition of..........- 230
LUN-HAM-GA TOWN, an Abihka town....... 254
LUSTUHATCHEE, a Muskogee town........ «Ja, 286
LUTCAPOGA—
8Tulsa branch: ..c.-csne fas oewee cnseelone 245

INDEX 477
Page. Page.
LutcarpocaA—Continued, MENENDEZ MARQUES, FRANCISCO, rebellion

Okfaskee Indians at... ......csccecex's os 248 Gualladibysrtaces cesansroreene cameos tae ces 119

WOMB HON Mass - dace ca ote ev accey ee 435 | MENENDEZ MARQUES, GOv. PEDRO, mention
MABILA, & Mobile province. ........-....-.-. 152 Ole anata ete aA epee anne als aie tate aes 16

See Mobile. METALS, use of, by Florida Indians... -.... 349-350
MACARISQUI, synonym for Nombre de Dios de METAMAPO, a Calusa town.............-.---- 332

RIA CATISOGS «cus dG dacs pae sea abla Ghou sites MIccANOPA, Chief of the Seminole .........-. 407
Maccou— MIc-c-sooc-E, a Seminole town.............-- 400
appearance ofnamein Spanishaccounts. 50 See Mikasuki.

LOCATION GE LUGS ae wae s oneness ek etannas 49 | MICHELSON, TRUMAN, on the Shawnee.....- 318

name applied to province..............-. 18 | MIcKASUKY, a Seminole town. ........--.--. 411

possibly the Yamacraw...........-.-.--- 18 Sce Mikasuki.

See Escamacu. MiIco—

MCGILLIVRAY, ALEXANDER, family of-......- 242 head, explanation of term.............-- 84
MACHABA, a Timucua town............... 112, 326 the Guale name for chief..........-- 14, 16, 84
McInrtosH, Coweta chief .................... 229 | MrkKASUKI—

MCQUEEN, JAMEs, Tulsa moved by......... 243 aieminole tribe: -.22ssecs cocci sao oe 409
MCQUEEN, PETER, 2 Tulsa chief............- 408 band of, of Muskogee lineage............. 405
McCQUEENS VILLAGE, a Seminole town. ..... 406 important element among the Seminole.. 402
MAIACA— one of the six Fowl towns..............- 178

a Timucua town..... Lm mae nano ieee oe 321, 326 proper spellingiofe | oo. camcntsce ce sides secee 401

Setbled by VAMASEC. ....<ccccsscscecnscws 339 relations with Hitchiti.................. 401
MAIERA. See Mayara. square ground of, near Seminole, Okla... 413
MATER CHULLVAGION Ola <oncinecincciceiecme va)ncic< 359 Yamasee probably fused with..........- 107
MAGAGA. GQ PIMIUCHS COWL ssccccccacceccecee: 326 | Mirko. See Mico.

MALAND. See Perquymaland. MIKONOPI—

MALDONADO, a Spanish explorer............. 147 head chief during Seminole war. .......- 412

Matica. See Malaca. PESIGONCO/Obe as serncts at Se ae oe ee aie 400, 404

MAP MADE BY LAMHATTY........ccccesecens 13 | MIRANDA, GUTIERREZ DE, in command of

MAPS RECORDING VILLAGE SITES, need of... - 10 Pantadilena Wort. ..>-<2sececscseaee sees 59

MARQUES, Gov., mention of..... “Dado 19 | MISSIONARIES—

MARRACOU, a Timucua chief and town...... 326 murder'Of, 111-1597... 22.22,ssaseeeoe asians 60

MARRIAGE CUSTOMS........ eovee 45, 77, 253, 371-373 sent to Apalachee: ....:...<2.csacctisase 118

MARTYR, PETER— Uprisingagamst 3... Ao0s sesso ae asses 16
account of Ayllon’s expedition by....... 32-33 | Missions—

account ofChicoraand DuhareIndiansby 41 amon? Chatot:. cts soe eescssce < Set 324-108 153
MASCARASI, @ synonym for Nombre de Dios AMSIACH CG as. ooni0 anes cis onaine holesaoieseee 323

AIPATTIACATINGGS 25.5 Seca s cs ews stcccue secsce 96 destroyed by Creeks and English...... 339-340
MASSACRE OF TRADERS............ Setectiseet pao MIOTIGSs 2 jase ceaenessee 89, 90, 322-323, 337-338
MASSI, a synonym for Yamasee...... peewee = 107 TH TINICURS ofr s sic one cee me oni Ue ee 322
MATAHALE, on the Tennessee. ..... Sa gesseet 214 | MOBILA TRIBE, mention of.............--.... 159
MATHEWS, MAURICE, cession of land to...... TOR MOBILE = 5 sick cs cass ca.celehmnous tele aeons 150-165
MATHIAQUA, a Timucua chiefand town...... 326 at war with Pensacola.............-..... 159
MATOHAH, Mention Of. <2. sc ecccesceenniccessd 214 CUSTOMS Of: 5.2.2 oo 02sec nates aechee. 162
MAUILLA, a2: Mobile toWD. 2-55. sc.ccncececcccs 156 encounter of, with De Soto. ............. 151
May, early name of St. Johns River......... 48 first meeting of, with Spaniards. .......- 150
Mayaca. See Maiaca. location of........ Bee sheabe ee Sea soe 159, 161
MAYAJUACA, 8 Timucua town............... 326 overthrown by De Soto...............--- 147
MayARA, a Timucua town................... 326 peace overtures to, from French... -....-.- 161
Mayon— POPULAHON Of-sseacenect so sagas eee eee 425

a Cusabo tribal and place name. ......-. 22 reconciliation of, with Tohome. ........- 163

AGGRO OF ss Seb apts ars aia opis 3 Sua e So's 49 singing of calumet by...........-....---- 162

not mentionedin Spanish narratives.... 50 union of, with Tohome. ........:-23-<+:2 164

probably united with other tribes. ...... 50 | MOBILE RIVER, settlements on. ..........--. 150
MAYRRA. See Mayara. MOBILIENS, location of..............2.-..-.2- 164
MEDICINE— : See Mobile.

plants used as...... Sie lala afee ce oe wisi ae 45,56 | MocAMA—

PIACUCO OM oe oe <a sine cde oeceete ea len 79,385 a mission on Cumberland Island......... 326
MEDICINE MEN, sorceries of. ..............-.- 162 meaning of name\.. 5-522) sh. 3 Ine tisS.- 90
MEKASOUSKY, a band of Creeks.............- 404 | Mocogo, a Timucua province. .............- 326

See Mikasuki. MoaGoso. See Mococo.

MELATTAW, & Chickasaw town..........---.- 419 | MoGOTE, a Timucua town........--.-...---- 326
MELTONS VILLAGE, an Upper Creek town.... 285 | MOLLONA. See Moloa.
MENENDEZ DE AVILES, PEDRO— MOLOA, a Timucua town. ....-: .. 25... 562% 326

SE POOHAGI: Olsoasancraccicdtvannccanacsse sens: 53-55 | MOLONA. See Moloa.

French settlement destroyed by......-.. 53 | MoLoua. See Moloa.

478 INDEX

MOOK-LAU-SAU, a synonym for Muklasa.. ... 207
MOONEY, JAMES—
conclusion of, regarding Santee and

SOwee'sss Ss ees genes saree eiettecton 17
on location of Cheraw tribe. .....-.--.---- 35
on mythology of southern Indians......- 36
on the Shawnee. .........- = \odcdgeicedoae 317
on the Tuskegee: ie cse=ceseeceeeeieea = 208
onthe Yvichis\-- seesaw oe 298
Siouan tribes studied by..........------- 10
Moore, Cou., in command of Creeks and
HON CVISHY «xo a.ce\- bese see eatole cto cieetelciels atte = 121
Moquoso. See Mocogo.
MoREs, a settlement close to St. Augustine.... 340
MORTUARY CUSTOMS: cere sacsesiseece ial 48, 80, 147
Moscoso, Luis DE, of De Soto’s expedition.. 152,
153, 155, 156
MoskOKy, a band of Creeks.......---.---- 404, 406
Motoa. See Moloa.
MoulILa, asynonym for Mobile.......-..---- 159
MouNDsS—
MEST CASQUL= Ae er cieininaiciateitse siecle mercies 214
on Ameliaisland ci cstoncted-escsecceees 312
reason for erection of............--------- 210
MOUENING CUSTOMS! 2252. scmec s7--- 22 373
MowlmLL,name given by Du Pratztothe Mobile 164
MoyAno, in charge of Fort San Juan......-- 293
MPU KICA SANS sane tiaieinlclneiricieiesteicnisisiniaminineeriata 207
‘an iWUipper Creek: tribe: it .saace---= 22-5 189
classed among the Tallapoosa Creeks..... 274
described by Hawkins...........-------- 207
linguistic classification of.........------- 13
meaning of thename.............-.-..-- 207
Mopulationiofesse ass csee see senate le 435
MULATTO GIRL’S TOWN, a Seminole town.... 407
MULATTO KING, a Florida chief............-- 407
MULBERRY TREE, a town on the Purcell map 319
IMUSKOGEE) «0 ae ise, Jos ashedeceees ee 2152282
derivation of the name..........-.------- 215
Givisions/OP theses. a.<ssecsesastsccee ete 215
towns'and villages... c.ssscc<scee == 282-286
MUSPA,. a Calusatowns.-e- scene eae 332
MYER, WM. E., on the Chiska........-....-- 292
MYTH OF LONG-TAILED MEN.......--.-------- 43,47
NaAcaPE. See Anacape.
NAFAPE, a Tulsa out-village...........------ 245
NAGUARETE, a Timucua chief........-..--.- 327
NAMES, geographical, from St. Augustine to
CapeMear : sascaseascceee ees seed eee eee 51
NAMUGUYA, a Calusa town.........------.-- 332
NANIABA—
classed. as: Choctaw 2: Jeece-ceeeees se -- 5 165
CuStoOmMS).Of2 <<2 2 cen tee eee none ee 162
LOCALLON Of scacceccscce ee eeees reeset 159-160
singing of calumet by-....--.----.-------- 162
NANIPACNA, a Mobile village. . .-.......-..-- 159
NANNA HuBBA, a survival of Naniaba....... 160
Napa, a Timucua place name. ..........-..- 327

NApPETACA. See Napituca.
NAPIssaA, united with Chickasaw. ......... 240,415

NAPITUCA, a Timucua village..............-- 327
NAPOCHIES—
a Choctaw-speaking people. ..-......---- 240
expedition against, by Spaniards and
CO0Sae tsa. Sansiei eae Soe see eneimeieeies 231-239
probably identical with the Napissa..... 240

Napuica. See Napa.

Page.
NARVAEZ—
Cabeza de Vaca’s narrative of.......... 112-115
ExpeditioniOies sccncencesceen sce ae ates 334
Nassau SOUND, French and Spanish names
fOF 2S ks ssodenscesec eee cee newt omemmetane 51
NATCHES, a synonym for Natchez........-.-. 314
NATCHEZ 25 st ee Sica tec aeeer 312-317
accountiof, Dy StigPInS=o-se sneer sees 313-316
an Upper Creek tribe................--.- 189
fused with the Abihka................... 313
LAN SUELO OLAS osate moacicce een eene anemia 314
Location! Of: secasacaessc-cneeeee meee = ees, Vrele
othertribes]oined"Dys-----s2-eeneeaeeee 312
population OfoS-soeet oc eect eee 434, 436
refugee, absorbed by Abihka...........-. 251
tradition of removal of...........-...---- 314
uprising of, due to the Chickasaw.......- 416
NATOBO, a Timucua mission. .............-- 327
NEA-MOTH-LA, a Florida chief. .............. , 407,
NEEDHAM, JAMES, explorations of........... 184
NEGROES, as gifts to Indians.............-... 263
NEGUITUN, a Calusa town.-............-.---- 332
NEw EUFALA, a colony from Eufaula........ 403
See Eufaula.
NEw TAMAUI, population of.............---- 434
NEW-YAU-CAU—
Geseription: of. -.csne2 -coceeee ee cease 249
Mention Of%=... sscsace sae e ac Ee See 248
NIA CUBACANI, a Timucua chieftainess. --.-.- 327
NIKASUKI—
claimed to be proper name for Mikasuki. 401
meaning of the name...............--..- 401
NINNIPASKULGEE, a band of Upper Creeks... 285
Nipxky, a lower Creek town. ......-..--.----- 285
NITAHAURITZ, an Alabama town............-. 198
NO; a Calusaitowns-s2fesn. se see eee aa ee eee 332
Nocoroco—
a\Blorida ‘chief. =2;2222ss2-teeses-seseeeee 336
a Timucua town: --seceseeee one eee 327
NOHUNT, THE GARTSNAR TOWN......-.------ 249

NOMBRE DE D1os—
Indian settlement near St. Augustine.. 104,340

la doctrina del pueblo de. .....--.-..-.-- 322
NOMBRE DE DIOS DE AMACARISSE........-.- 322
a mission near St. Augustine. ..........- 96
Yamacraw from: : 222 cv densceessoneeene 108

Non. See No.

NortH Episto RIVER—
explored by Robert Sandford............ 63
Spanish mametors-pec sees =n eeeeee see 51

Nuaq. See Huaque.

NUESTRA SENORA DE GUADALUPE.......... 322

NUESTRA SENORA DE GUADALUPE DE TOLO-

MATO ss sccccct cascbcee eet teste ere 89, 90, 322

NUESTRA SENORA DE LA CANDELARIA DE LA

KVAMIArS Soe see tears Seed ae ae eee 110, 182, 323

NUESTRA SENORA DE LA PURISSIMA CONGEP-

CION SDE AGU BAL io eee ase ee nee 110, 323

NUESTRA SENORA DE LA SOLEDAD, an Apa-

NaGhee TOWN ea. w ccc caccics ese seek see eee 126

NUuT GRASS, medicinal qualities of. ........-- 56

NvuyAKA, origin of the name.............---- 248

See Newyaucau.
OAKCHINAWA VILLAGE, an Upper Creek town 285
OAKCHOYS, a synonym for Okchai........... 275
OAXKJOTE, a form of Ocute.............-.--2- 175

——

See Edisto..

INDEX 479
Page Page
OAKMULGES, a Seminole tribe..............- 409 | OEFASQUE TALAJASE, an Okfuskeetown.... 246
identification ots. oe. co .steteee ae oc ew? os 51 | OEFASQUETS, an Okfuskee town............. 246
See Okmulgee. OEMOULKE, a synonym for Okmulgee....... 178
OBALDAQUINI, ISLA DE— OEYAKBE—
IGGNEINCRUON Of wos cs encanta sce se sae 51 a Lower Creek town...........2.--..2-2% 174
rebellion.of Indians)of.2ces6- dacs .s'sses 91 a synonymn for Okiti-yagani............ 143
OCALE, a Timucua province............-.. 321, 327 TIOABINE Oss = Soh coma emeepeneeet See. 175
OcaPpaTaGa, a Calusa town..............-.-- 332 | OruLo. See Yfulo.
OccANEECHEE, Rickohockans murdered at.. 296 | OGEECHEE OLD Town, a Yuchi town....... 312
OcCANEECHI, a Siouan tribe................. 184 | OGLETHORPE, GOV.—
Oc-FUS-COO-CHE, a branch of Okfuskee......- 251 founding of colony of Georgia by......... 108
Oc-FUS-KEE, synonym for Okfuskee. Pee! 249 BEVEL CEN a aon eee a= 15
OcHE Havso, a Creek chief. ...............- 281 | OGOLAGGHOOS—
OCHEESE CREEK, old name for Ocmulgee given as a Tawasa town..............-.- 121
Cee oat ee ee 215, 220 Synonyimifor Yuch ives see) eee se 131, 304
OCHEESES, a Seminole tribe............ .---- 409 | OHATHLOKHOUCHY, a Seminole town... ...... 411
See Ochisi, Otcisi. OIKI EAKO. See Okmulgee.

~ OCHETE, an Apalachee town................. 111 | Oryaxkpl, Muskogee name for Okiti-yagani... 143

OcHILE. See Assile. See Okiti-yakani.
OcHIsI, name applied to the Muskogee..-..... 226 | OKA LUSA, meaning of the name............. 214
See Ocheeses, Otcisi. OKATIE. See Oketee.
O-CHUCE-ULGA, a Seminole town. .........-. 407 | OKAWAIGI, branch of the Sawokli............ 143
O-CHU-PO-CRAS-SA, a Seminole town ......... 407 See Kawaigi.
OcHus, a synonym for Achuse............... 140. | WORCHAT. 53-5 f acc sce onshore eotaa set SS 274-277
OcHus PROVINCE, location of.............-.. 151 a Muskogee division .........22.........- 215
Octtta. See Assile. among the Seminole..................... 275
(Ogira, & Timucna tOwn<.-s.sss.c.ce ccs. ce sd 327 an Upper Creek tribe. -3-2-:..eae2-«~4c6 189
OcKLAWAHA— association of Alabama with............. 200
IS GITETOT OM oo 1s 404 element among the Seminole............ 403
the last remnant of Yamasee Indians.... 402 MASSACTE AL... sce 25 oat sere oe ee eee 246
Oc-LACK-O-NA-YAHE, a Seminole town......- 406 population: of: . 35.5.5. 53s. 2ee ae eee 432, 436
Oc-LA-WA-HAW, a Seminole town...........- 407 united with the Muskogee..............- 274
See Oklawaha. OKCHAIUTCI—

- OC-LE-WAU THLUC-CO, a Seminole town...... 400 anvAla bam a tows. 5s, teers eh eee ee eee 200
OCMULGEE OLD FIELDS, described by Bartram 177 an Upper Creek tribe.........:....--2s: 189
OCMULGEE RIVER, old name for.........-- 215, 220 part of the Alabamai<? 225202220. S.52202 275
MCMUTONMEVINEAGEC co soos tke poten once cs 179 population Of. - .-sasecence nes ce eee 436

; See Okmulgee. OKE-A-FENOKE SWAMP, settlement of Cowetas
OCMULQUE, a Lower Creek town........-..-- 131 OD osc sas Sane’ Safenmacsdeccceer cece se tae 407
See Okmulgee. OKEETEE. Sce Oketee.
OcongE, Ibarra’s name for Oconee..........-- 179 | OKEHUMPKEE, a Seminole town............- 411
EET ee Sa = ee ee 179-181 | OKETEE, the Cusabo name of ariver......... 22
a lower Creek town and tribe.. 131,174,189,221 | OKETEET. See Oketee.
application of thename.................. 179 | OKE-TE-YO-CON-NE. See Okitiyakani.
expedition against............- BRIE os et 180 | OKFUSKEE—
Mistany Glee =— 2.2 fs Ae 180 descended from Coosa............------- 246
included in Hitchiti group..............- 172 described by Hawkins................-.- 249
linguistic classification of................ 12 meaning of thename....2........-...... 249
LUE nn ae oe a 180 MopulaioOn Ofte sti aes eteete oe 436
nucleus of the Seminole...............- 398, 400 LOWUS# pian ob sa% acdsee sense ness. <tsceses 246
THAI GU RSS a a 211 | OKFUSKUTCI, population of.................. 436
PTE i Coe ee ee 427,435-| OKIHAMGI, a Florida town...........-.-..... 404
OTA 9) Eg ee ae ee ee 101 | OkmOmGA. See Okehumpkee.
Seminole town made from............... 400 | OKITI-YAKANI—
town of, described by Hawkins.......... 181 a branch of the Sawokli ................- 143
HNO A PAlAChiCOlaes ...<.65 -nacncalecclewes 129 a Lower Creek and Seminole town and
Oconl, an Apalachee town ..............-..- 112 Ua ee eee ener Oe aoas se eee 174, 409
See Oconee. Meaning of name Of. -...5 <2 a6 22s26322- 322 175
Ocony, Pareja’s name for Oconee.......-..-- 179 | OKLAWAHA BAND OF SEMINOLE, descended
OcuLEYA. See Uculegue. {LON VAMASCO. « .Ssea5e spas se sbeeses} EES 107
OCULEYGUE. See Uculegue. OEMULGEER, J... ic saednes cokk Sacsteee ood 178-179
OcuTE— a branch of the Hitchiti................. 178
a@ synonym for Hitchiti........2......... 175 a .Lower:Creek tribe. .....2.2-2s-S0¢ te 22 189
IGRRUCAL With PLIGGDIbl.c oss. ce c0<cceec~ ss 174 included in Hitchiti group............... 172
MEH EOn A CHIC sen fcoccacocecacatecenes 95 population: Of cus<s.s05 ss cca= 5 eee 426, 434
ODISTASH, another name for Edisto Island... 67 signification of name.3.-.<<5é . 2: 4222 2. 178

OKMULGEE TOWN, Hitchiti first tosettleat. 176

480 INDEX
Page Page.
OKOMULGUE, a synonym for Okmulgee... ..- 179 | ORISTAU TRIBE, rebellion of, in 1576....-..... 58
OKONIS, a Lower Creek town ......---------- 174 See Orista.
See Oconee. Or1x. See Orixa.
OKTAHA, composition Of.....-.-------------- 260 | Orrxa, a Cusabo province (see Orista).....-- 37
OKTAHASASI— ORNAMENTS of Florida Indians........-..-- 348
PAID UV ACC: See tel\ owe we eee comets oe e 260 | ORRIPARACOGI,a Timucuachiefand province. 327
POPULANON OR esate elect ele ee 436 | ORRIYGUA, a Timucua chief..........------- 327
OKTAHATKU, a Seminole town......---.------ 411 | OSACHEES, a Lower Creek town.......------ 174
Oxtcaryutcl, an Alabama town.......---.-- 192 See Osochi.
OLATA OUAE UtINA, chief of Timucua...... 327 | OSCANGUE. . See Cascangue.
OLATACHAHANE, @ Gualename..........--.- 83 | OscEOLA, Seminole leader............--.--- 412
OLATAPOTOQUE, a Guale town.......-.-.---- OSCILLEE, a Seminole town.......-.-.------- 411

OxatTayco. See Alatico.

OLATAYLITABA, a Guale town.........--.----
OLD Brinins, head chief of Lower Creeks... 103
OLD COOSA, mention! Of: <-2cc-—s 52 eens =e 241
OLD MIKASUKI, first settlement of true Mika-

SUBIR sane sneer sec sicbiocece terete esiome shake 401
OLD OSONEE TOWN, an Upper Creek village... 285
OLD SUWANY Town, a Seminole town...-... 406
OLD TAMALI, population of.............---- 435
OLIBAHALI—

a synonym for Hotiwahali............--. 255
ID OMUIMASWWASLbttOs oe sane eas aces enice ee 255
WISILOGsDyiS DANIBTOS tose eiseeetie seems 231
OLOCATPA, a Gualeitown.- secs. e-seeee seas 84
OLOGALE. See Ocale.
OLOTACARA, a Florida chief...............-.- 327

OmITIAQUA. See Mathiaqua.
Omo.Loa. See Moloa.

OMOLQUET—

a Lower Creek townl:2<cesccesss-s20---2 174

a synonym for Okmulgee.............-.- 178
OMUSEE CREEK, named from the Yamasee. 108
ONATHAQUA, a Timucua tribe or town...... 327
ONATHEAQUA—

a Timucua province... .......-..------ 327

LOCHT OM Oba ari sam aereclde acca aa raisin teats 321
ONI-SE-CAU, a Cusabo place name............ 22
OOE-ASA, a town occupied by Natchez and

@Ohickasaw:c..tescsck seasse ere eee ace cee 313

OOK-TAU-HAU-ZAU-SEE, a Hilibi village..... 259

See Oktahasasi.
OosECHA, a synonym for Osochi............. 166
OOsSE-00-CHE, Hawkins’s name for Osochi... 166
OPELOUSAS BAND, on the Mississippi........ 199
OPILLAKO, a Muskogee town.........-...-.-- 282

OPILLIKEE HATCHEE, Kasihta settlement on 225
O-PIL-THLUC-cO, Hawkins’snamefor Opillako. 282

O-PO-NAYS-TOWN, a Seminole town..-....-... 406
OPPONYS, name given Oconee.........---.-- 180
ORDONOY, a Florida town..........-....... 333

ORIBE. See Urubia.
OripiA. See Urubia.

ORISTA—
a Cusabo tribe and town...........------ 60, 82
Btwar withiGuales..8.- ct tes sece 53-54
chief of, vassal of chief of Aluete.-.-.-..... 19
people of, described by Rogel...........- 57
probable origin of the name.....-........ 37
synonymifor Hdisto--e--.------------«- 19-20
town of, burned....... SAS a ae 54
tribute levied One see esd-eeaeceee senses 58
See Edisto.

ORISTA, BAHIA DE, identification of.......-.. 51

ORISTANUM, See Edisto,

OSENUBBA HATCHEE, Kasihta settlement on 225
OSIGUBEDE. See Osiquevede.

OSINGULO, son of a Coweta chief......-..---- 125
OSIQUEVEDE, a Timucua province. ....-.-... 327
OSOCHI? 432 seentee satee ss case Onan ar ee eee 165-167
a Lower Creek tribe........-..-.-----=-- 189
association of, with Chiaha...........--- 166
connection of, with Ugachile........-.-.-- 166
early associations of.-.....---.---------- 25
language spoken by---------.---:----..-- 165
MieTationlOfss =. .s- setae eee eee 165
OF ginlOfee ace 4-2 ee ee ee eee 165
Population) Of2 2 Somece eee se eee 426, 434
Osos, ISLA DE LOS, identification of.....-.- 51
Ospo, rebellion against missionaries at... .-- 86

See Espogue.
OsPpoGuE. See Espogue.
OssABAW ISLAND, French and Spanish

Names Oreos see oeeien = seeks see ener 51
OssABAW SOUND, French and Spanish names

fOP=ce cease cues Soe eames em merieaaseoae 51
OSSACHILE, a Synonym for Ugachile........- 165
OSSUARIMS Spee ee eee a access saseeete eer 48
OsTAGA. See Hostaqua.
OSTANO, a synonym of Stono................ 61
OsTANO, BAHIA DE, identification of........ 51

OsTANUM. See Stono.

_OSUCHE, a Lower Creek town.....-.-------- 131

See Osochi.
OSWICHEE, a synonym for Osochi-.-.-...-..-- 166
OTAFE. See Otaxe.

OTAPALAS, a Gualeitown. ~-------2-seseseen 81
OTASHE, a synonym for Atasi-.......-.----- 265
OTax. See Otaxe.
OTAXE—
ai Gualetowil-.scncctiedeaseesee ee Roeee 81
a synonym for Atasi.......-.-..-.--.-..- 265
OTCIAPOFA— ‘
a pure Muskogee town..-....-..---------- 200
derivation of the name-_--2-...--.--2-2. 242
descended from Coosa......-.----------- 242
population Ol Fe ao. eae ee 435
OTers!, origin of term. -- -- =. eee ene 413-414
See Ocheeses, Ochisi.
O-TEL-LE-WHO-YAU-NAU, a Chiaha village... 170
See Hotalgihuyana.
OTI PALIN, a Muskogee town......-.--.------ 285
OTITUTCINA, a Creek town.............----- 285
OTOA, asynonym for Tamati...........-.--- 181
SABANGHIHAREA, on the Tennessee. ....-.--- 21
OvADE—
identification Ole. caieses<qeee see e=Eeee 50
location of..... i ee I et et i ay 50
synonym for Guale.............--.--...- 53, 84

ties 4's, ew

INDEX 481
Page Page.
OUCHOUTCHIS, a synonym for Osochi. ..... -- 175 | PARCAGOULES, a synonym for Pascagoula... 138
Ovurusky, a form of Okfuskee..........-.---- 246 | PARCHED-CORN INDIANS, name of remnants
OUSCHETAWS, a synonym for Osochi......... 166 OMcosstitrines! 2. sa--cpeacecss2: Some seo 72
OvusTACK INDIANS— PARDO, JUAN—
feared by the Catawba...............---- 306 expeditions) ofss «s2mss2c -h.025. 20 55, 167, 171
TGGHEANOE BSW CSD oc eb ose cencccsdeamaes 292 fort built by, in province of Juada...... 293
Ouxa. See Orixa. visit of, to Coosa country ....-.......-.-: 240
Ovyoutcuis, a Lower Creek town identified PAREJA, FRAY FRANCISCO DE—

PBR ON ee <oik.* on oa ws tenmad ea teatieme ace 174 LOGLOTS Ofe2aot.2 7 eer edb ope onan 5. 337
OWASSISSAS, a Seminole tribe.....-.---------- 409 missionary to the Timucua............. 118
OWEN, WILLIAM, letter of, referring to coast works of, in Timucua language. .-....-_. 337

MM IATISter eer, woe. Sch enaemaica e's =cittm 67 PASCAGOULA—

OWENDAW. See Awendaw. MENGOMNIOl-oece ee nee Se ss .cetoee tee oe 149, 150
Oya— war declared by, on the Tawasa.......-- 138
a Cusabo place name. ................--. 22 | PASCAGULAS. Sce Pascagoula.
RERGUISED LOW seccetnnmenminn ma cen a sicn 9 mainte 82 | PAsQuE, probably same as Pasqui........... 38
a South Carolina chief.................-- 19 PASQUI, a Cusabo province. ...........-.-.-- 37
See Hoya. PASSACOLAS, mention of.........-... ee eee 149
PACAHA, visited by De Soto................. 214 Sec Pensacola.
PACANAS— PATANO. See Potano.
a synonym for Pakana...............-..- 274 | Panica—
described by Sibley..................---- 274 aiGarolina\ tribes: s-35+.as5sckene-ot aes 104
PAD-GEE-LI-GAU, a Yuchi village............. 310 a Timuciis town: oa 500. Sh Noe 397
PAFALLAYA, a Choctaw province...........-. 421 Cusabo name ofa tribe..............-.-- 22
PAHOC, a Cusabo province..........-...----- 37 | Pau-woc-tr. See Pawokti.
See Pahor. PR WORN aes ot tas ee Sota pe 137-141
PAHOR, a province mentioned by Peter an Alabama town.-...---cc-¢-csesce.- 141,192
Martyr........-------------+22-+ ++ 22-220 43 described by Hawkins...........-...... 197
See Pahoc. linguistic classification of-............... 13
PAKAN TALLAHASSEE— Mopulationtofin- 42. 2hs sone aa oo ees 424
identification of.-........---------------- 273 | PEA CREEK, a Muskogee settlement........ 285
OTe G AGM Sa eee A ee ae 432,435 | Prarts—
PAKANA.....-.----222000222---2----22 222+: 272-274 collected by De Soto..:..2.....-.---:-.-- 153
a Muskogee division.......---.-.-.------ 215 gathered by natives. ..............-.... 73, 220
account of, by Stiggims...-.....-....-..- 272 of Bloridasindians. 25-23 -seosat aa eee 348
an Upper ONRGHAUILUG. oc cchce noone ce wiecne 189 presented to Spaniards Ls ede. ee 54
incorporated with the Muskogee... ......- 272 | pepe, a Timucua chief................------ 327
language of.--....--.-------------------- 7 | PEDEE RIVER, Spanish name for.........-.. 51
move to Red River...........-..-...--- 128 | PELACLEKAHA, PE-LAC-LE-KE-HA, a Seminole
origin Of. .........-..-------------------- 273 (Hay; Dt ee eB ED Sees UR es a 404, 407
population of.............--------------- 435 | PgnicauT, description of Apalachee by..... 124
settlement of, near Fort Toulouse ..... 273,274 | PpwsacoLa—
PALACHOCOLAS Fort, an Apalachicola settle- at war with the Mobile.................- 148

ment... ---.- 22-222 - 2-2-0 eee 131 destroyed in wars. ----...-:--22---.02h-- 148
PA-LA-CHOOC-LE— linguistic classification of. .......-...-.-- 13

a peace town....---....---.------.-+---- 134 little known regarding................... 144

Seminole town made from............... 400 VOCAL OT OTe ees oe ek aes Se te oak 143, 148

See Apalachicola. manner of hair dressing.............-..-- 13
PALAWANA, a Cusabo place name............ 22 Pen iGr Ofte sae Be ee. Piao eee 150
PALAWANA ISLAND, CusaboIndianssettledon 70 Pocuintive Of en... Sores. ck eS eee 425
PaLica, an Indian village near St. Augustine. 104, propelnameof. 2540-2 -.>_ terse eee 143
: 105,340 village of, on Pearl River...............- 150
PALLACHICOLAS, head town of Upper and PENTOAYA, @ Timucua town. ...........-... 327

Lower Creeks....--.--------+-+-++-+-++--- 129 | People OF THE FoRKS, a synonym for

See Apalachicola. Rania Gare ee Kes ee as aS 159, 162
PALLACHOCOLAS, synonym for Apalachicola. 134 PERQUYMALAND, a Timucua town...-..-..-. 397
Pale ee Ee iower Creek Cyn... ie PERRYMAN, JOE, a chiefofthe Creek Nation. 179

Leelee : PERRYMAN, LeEGus, a chief of the Creek
PALOCHOKOLO, a synonym for Apalachicola. 134 Nation 179
PANARA, & Timucua town............-...--- KPTAGH » Bk Satie eae eg Me Mal inn koe ee 4 0 Aa A Ba z
PANCHACULAS, PANCOCOLOS, PANZACOLA. PESTILENCES. --.-- 20. ---220c0ea--ecenen20- 151, 338
. See Pensacola. PHONETICS—
Paor. Sce Pahoc. OCELIETENCE Of Pe cen ccecte a3 ase 15, 18,19, 24
PARACHOCOLAS Fort, an Apalachicola settle- occurrence of “1””...... 15,18, 19, 20,24, 29,38, 41

VIELE eerie Cle Ben pn em, 131 OCCHITEN CEO! Hn) Fe oe cawcesectan te <n ase 15, 24
PARACOXI. See Orriparacogi. occurrence of “‘r’’.......5 ates 15,19, 20, 29,38
ARCA, @, DIMUCIA TOWN: ..0 2-10... = 2-2-0: 327 occurrence of “w’......-..-..- SPoeenesen 24

148061°—22—-31

482 ' INDEX

Page. Page
PIAS a LimuciatOwne.-- see =e ieee 328 | Priests. See Shamans.
PIACHI, a Mobile village. .....---.-.--------- 152 | Provinces, Cusabo, list of..............---- 36-38

Location! Ofm eam creer = eee ae 146 | PROVINCIA DE GUALE Y MOCAMA, missions
PIrPEAKOy POPUlationlOl-e-e=sse. see eee 436 COMIDTISI eee eerie ee eee ee eee ae 90
PINCLATCHAS, Swan’s name for Opiltako....- 282 | PuALA, a Timucua town.....--.-..-.-....-- 328
PINDER Town. See Fulemmys Town. PUCCUNNAS, a synonym for Pakana......... 272
PINEDO, Spanish explorer. .-....------------- 150 | PUNHURI, a Timucua town...-..........-.-. 328
PIN-E-HOO-TE, a Muskogee branch village.... 282 | PuTURIBA, a Timucua town.............-.-- 328
PIQUA BAND OF SHAWNEE.......-.---------- 317 | QuacayA. See Guacaya.

PITANO, a Florida mission station. ....--.---- 328 | QuExos, PEDRO DE, expedition under com-

PIvAVAL a DIMUuCHaIGhici. se sce. see =e 328 MAT Ole eee eae eer 32, 34

PLEASANT PoRTER, an Okmulgee chief of QUEYHICHA, a Calusa town.................- 332
the@reck Natione:..-sccesee eee ee sae = 179 | QumarTE, chief of San Marcos...............- 129

Po-CHUSE-HAT-CHE, a Synonym for Potcas QUISIYOVE, a Calusa town......--..........- 332
Hatcheesces. sec tee Seen see. renee e eae rite 276 | QuizQut, a town near the Mississippi-.-..-.-- 293

POCOLABO, a Yamasee town...........------ 97 | Quizquiz. See Quizqui.

POCcOTABACA, Synonym for Pocatalaca.....-- 104 | QuOHATHE—

PocoraLaca, Indian settlement near St. ‘a Cusaboiprovineess. =) aee0 ass aeeeee sees 37
INS TISHING tae = Ao Seon ec eee ees eee 104 a province mentioned by Peter Martyr.. 43

POCOTALIGAT TOWN, a Yamasee town....-..-. 98 | Rappir TOWN— :

See Pocotaligo. an Upper Creeks (Owl sys eee eee ee 286
POCcOTALIGO, a Yamasee town.......-..----- 97 population Of 2. .e-e secs asses eee 437
Posoy. See Pooy. RANJEL—

POLAWAK, a Cusabo place name........-.--- 22 description of Apalachee by. ........-.- 115-116
IR OULYG AMI mene see tee tate dase aces aa 45, 77 narrative of De Soto expedition by.... 151-154
PONCE DE LEON— Ratoso. See Natobo.

expeditions Ofs: ss acc-ecree cee soccer 333,334] REA, a Plorida town: = --22-----22-0-=-seeee= 333

HMioridamamedibyee-sseesee eo sere ene 333 | REBELLION OF 1576, against the Spaniards. . 58

not the discoverer of Florida.......--.-- 31,333 | REBELLION OF 1580, against the Spaniards... 59
Pooy— REBELLION OF 1597, against missionaries.... 85-87

a Timucua fowdles- sess cose eee acceso 328 CAUSeS Of-.o rin 22-6 ees eee a ae eee 88

OXPeCGIbiON ALAINSU ac noe weer sire 343 | RECHAHECRIANS, expedition against......... 295
POPULATION— See Rickohockans.

ofApalacheeieeeeenseeees steele e oes eees 120 | RED GROUND, principal Alabama town... -. 197

of Apalachicolacses-22-2ats-2 sess nee 134 | RED GROUNDS, a Seminole tribe.........-.- 409

of Florida provinces. .........----------- 337 | RED SHOES, a Koasatichief................- 204

OTR SENS 555536 Saab asoebadesqemecoods 205,206 | Rep STICK BAND, reason forname.........- 405

of Seminole tribes. ...........--..------- 409 | Rep-rown, a Seminole town.............- 406, 407

of Southeastern tribes. .....----.---.-: 421-457 | RELATIONSHIP, terms of.............------ 363-370
Port Royat— RELIGION OF THE CUSABO............------ 78

colony left at...........-----.-------+--- 49 | Ripautt, JEAN, expedition under-......... 48, 335

principal Indian town of, described... .... 65 | RickKOHOCKAN—

PorT ROYAL ISLAND, tribes in vicinity of... 49 identified as Yuchi....................- 189
Port RoyaL SOUND— identified with Westo.--.............--- 291

French and Spanish names for..........- 51 in Carolitias2@. 2s. eee tee ee ee 296

named by Ribaullt:-o se. semes-sse see 49 See Rechahecrians. -
POSACHE, a Guale town.............-------- 81,82 | RickonoGo, a synonym for Rickohockans... 292
Porataca, Indian villagenear St. Augustine. 105 | Rio JorDAN, identification of............... 51

Sce Pocotalaca. See Jordan River.

PoTaANo— RIVERS NAMED BY RIBAULT, identification of. 51

AGH ONIGaiGhiete-eeeeeeete eee eer oe eee eee 336 | RODRIGUEZ, FR. BLAS, murder of....---...-- 86

fa Mlorida provinces=eees--eeneeeeeeeeeeee 328 | ROGEL, JUAN, missionary efforts of.......... 57

incation Of: ....f+s tse ee ee 321 | Roots, used as medicine..---.............-- 56

pUplation OF; fe. .1k cee ea eee 337 | RounD TOWN PEOPLE, a name forthe Yuchi. 297
PorAaToEs, produced in Duhare Province... 42 | RU, Fray PEpRo, in charge at San Pedro. 89
PorayA, a Timucua town.............0-2-+- 393 | SABACOLA, a Lower Creek towmn’c es). eee 131
PoTcas HATCHEE— See-Sawokl.

P SABOBCHE, a Timucua town...............-- 328

an Okchai settlement ca a a he on ae 216 SACASPADA, @ Calusa town............---..- 332

described by Hawkins...............---- 276 SACRIRICH, humans sees esee ee eens 382, 388-389

population of. .-.-.--.--------------+---- 436 | SaGaREEs, at war with the Tuscarora ...... 18
PoTHOHIRIVA, PotoaiRiBiA. See Puturiba. Sr. ANDREWS SOUND, French and Spanish
PoroyoToya, a Timucua place name.......- 328 names for....-.-- Soa 8 SB ote eee 51
PoturipaA. See Puturiba. Sr. CATHERINES ISLAND—

PovUHKA— called) Guale:2 = 52t20cke S332 eee eae 81

a synonym for Pawokti..............-.-. 131 early name {00> - ses == Sean eee 41

& TAWASA TOWN -o-< ccc cc cco eceesennineane 131 French and Spanish names for..--.-..-.- 51

rye >. a]

Ni ret he

INDEX 483
Page. Page.

St. CATHERINES SOUND, French and Spanish SAN FELIPE—

TIAMOS TOR Gee weece sue ids Sats cise ee» 51 MOP A IMSSION «5 ae sree a: aie tas ameter orclots 322
St. GEORGE INLET, early French name for.. 52 abandonment Ofessacenoc cace oss tem one 5 93
St. HELENA, arrival of English at........... 62 rebellion of ludians of. ~-.22-..5...0- =<. 91

Sce Santa Elena. SAN FELIPE, FortT—

St. HELENA INDIANS, a South Carolina tribe. 67,68 St OViSta ec oe Oe ae 54
PrGladed in USADOS. once 6s 2 3 am nk oa 7 puruediby, budians ss .ssec eo. eee 58

St. HELENA IsLAND, French and Spanish SAN FELIPE DE ATHULUTECA............-..- 322

NAMES OL... - = 22... none es - sn- eos - es 51 | San FRANCISCO DE APALACHE—

St. HELENA SouNnD, French and Spanish an Apalachee mission................-- 110, 323

SNE CS 18 pp ei ase ee fe Ra cir erar 51 an Oconee mission.............- See ee 179

- St. HELENS, Indians of, tribes included in.. 61 | San FRANCISCO DE CHUAQUIN.........---.-- 322

St. HELLENA, chieftainess of,land ceded by. 70 | San FRANCISCO DE OCONI—

St. JoHN THE BAPTIST RIVER— an Apalachee mission...............-.- 110, 323
MBM et aceceeie cs cet. <= .- -35, 36-38, 41 ani Ocones missions®=".-; .a2sesese acess 180
RS PRN ee ee ROR ae ches ans see ose = 32 | SAN FRANCISCO DE POTANO.............---- 322

St. Jouns RIVER— SANE RANCISCO) PATANOD-. 3. .jasccasuatan see 322
PONG MIBING Olveeter cae ox sa sce ccicneis ns owen 48 | SAN ILDEFONSO DE CHAMINI.......-.-------- 322
French and Spanish names for.......-..- 51 | San JOAN DE OSPALAGA, an Apalachee

St. JULIAN, a Timucua town............:..- 328 MISSION Ss petionacinc a= oon SE eee ee 110. 323

Sr. Louis, an Apalachee town..........-.- 123,124 | San JosEF DE APALACHE, an Apalachee mis-

St. MARKS, a Seminole town..-............-- 400 SOM spice ets tae ee se ee 110, 323

St. Marys RIver, French and Spanish SAN JosEF DE ZApPALA, SAN JOSEPH DE

NOG Olen eee sean se ctee seas senders ce 51 CAPALA, & Florida mission......-..-....-- 89, 322
St. Sron ISLAND, French and Spanish SAN JOSEPH DE OcurA, an Apalachee mis-

HANGS ONES ee ob os wanis Soo oas ek eons aces 51 11012 Ces eee Be gue ese soa aes ci 110, 323
St. Smron Sounp, French and Spanish SAN JUAN BAuvTISTA, RIO DE, identification

TGS (CIS Lae RES n Sst: DER eS aarene ae ece 51 Of ere eee erect ck see ae 5 SES 51
St. Sons, abandonment of.........-.----- 93 | San JUAN DE APALACHE, an Apalachee
St. TAFFERY’S, a small Creek town........-- 286 NNISST OD 3s 21S ees Pere mess 3 Se 2 een coat 110, 323
SAINTE HELENA INDIANS, a Cusabo tribe. ... 68 | gan JuAN DE GUACARA—

See St. Helena Indians. allloniddamission-2- 32 eet 322

SAKAPADAI— a Dimucua tOwice.<aes asc eee eee 127
population of......... torsteceessceec sees 436 | San JUAN DEL PUERTO.........------------- 322
story of origin of name..........-....---- 264 | San JuAN, Fort, establishment of.......... 171

SALAS, GASPAR DE, expedition of........... 176,181 | gan Jy AN, ISLA DE, indentification of......- 51

SALCHICHES— SAN JUAN Mission, described by Dickenson. 92
a Muskhogean tribe. .....-.......-.----- 83 | San LoRENGO DE YBITHACHUCU, an Apala-
an unidentified inland EIDE Saas 5 3b 60 Ghicemission-< Sst Ea 110, 112, 323 *
referred to as a province of Tama........ 83 | San LORENZO DE APALACHE, an Apalachee

SALENOJUH, a Kasihta village Sbostprctacsoe. 224 missions... 262. VE NS he 110, 323

SALINACANI, a Florida TIV ODS =) 20i- 2 220-5550 328 | San LorENzO, Rio DE, identification of... 51
See Alimacani. SAn LUIS DE APALACHE, an Apalachee mis-

SALVADOR DE MaIACA Mssotectbs atsesseu atte 322 SROne oe Eey eee dea ate Po 110, 323

SAMPA, a Cusabo tribe. .-...----.------------ 67 | San Luts, dela provincia de Acueraal Sur.. 322

SaMPALA, a Seminole town..........-.------ 411 | san Luis DE TALIMALI, an Apalachee mis-

SamPiT— es As hg 5 Tae ee iy PE LP fr 110, 323
probable origin of name. ................ 38 in MARCOS
tae wi later name for Fort San Felipe 58

SAw AGUSTIN DE URICA. . . 202222. 22225-25522 322 aT ORT Oey) | a TEN

la Seay ren eer 95,322 referred to. as Fort Catuco.............-- 59

SAN ANTONIO DE BACUQUA.........-.---.- 110, 323 SAN MARCOS DE APALACHE, PORT OF—

SAN ANTONIO DE NACAPE. ..............---- 322 an Apalachee mission......-.....-.------ ud

SAN BUENAVENTURA DE BOADALQUIVS.... 89,322 Apalachee settlement near..............- 126

SAN BUENAVENTURA DE OVADALQUINI...... 399 | SAN MARTIN DE APALACHE, an Apalachee

SAN CARLOS DE Los CHACATOS— missiON....-----------+-+-++++--+-+------ 110, 323
Ghat Mission oer Se oo oe ce 135 | SAN MARTIN DE AYAOCUTO ...............--- 322
an Apalachee mission.................. 110,323 | SAN MARTIN DE TOMOLI, an Apalachee
attacked by Lower Creeks............... 135 Mission... ......-------++--+++-++-+--20+-- 110, 323

San CosME Y SAN DAMIAN, an Apalachee San MATEO, a Timucua village.........-..-. 328

nite > a a re 110, 323 SAN MATEO, RIo DE, identification of... .... 51
San CosME ¥ SAN DAMIAN DE YECAMBI, an SAN MATHEO DE TOLAPATAFI.........-----.- 322

Apalachee mission...........-....------- 110, 323 SAN MIGUEL DE ASILE, SAN MIGUEL DE
SAN DAMIAN DE Cupayca, an Apalachee ASSILE .. 2222-2 22+-+ 200202 ce eee eee ee eee eee 322

HERG G1. <2 Oks ae Bee ee Ene ge 111 | SAN MIGUEL DE GUALDAPE—

San DIEGO DE ECALAMOTOTO.............. 322 location. Of 75<.5s2asJ scence soos deena e 41

BANIDIEGOIDE ACA S aio inccee io c<'cecesiecccce 322 settlement called... ..--.-..:2.-.--.2-.-.- 34

484 INDEX
Page. Page.
San Nicontas, Indian village near St. SANTA MARIA, BAHIA DE, identification of... 51

ANIsUStiNnG 55 oc 5 cee see eck ose se eesee ee eee 105 | SANTA MARIA, ISLA DE, indentification of.... 51
San NICOLAS DE TOLENTINO, a Chatot mis- SANTA MARIA DE LOS ANGELES DE ARAPAJA. 322

SION... 2. cnc c cc ccc scene renew wee en nent eceen= 135 SANTEE—

SAN PABLO, a Timucua Village. .........-..- 328 a Cusabo tribe. 2 eee 67,68
SAN PEDRO, attack on monks at.......----.- 87 colonists:of, ab war With)s..- oes. coeeeoees 71
SAN PEDRO, BAHIA DE, identification of. . . -- 51 included in: Gasabosesnen eee 17
SAN PEDRO, ISLA DE, identification of. ....-- ol language of, distinct from Escamaqu.... 17
SAN PEDRO ATULUTECA.......-------------- 322 placed with Siouan tribes...............- 17
SAN PEDRO DE LOS CHINES, an Apalachee ' Shien cea

bE SE pepe 2.599. 9 eee SS 5 oe French and Spanish names for........... Sle
SAN PEDRO DE POTHOHIRIVA.........-.-..-- 822 F : :
ane Papeo MGOItee ee EL ee ie te 399 identified as the River Jordan........... 35
Sune Uy (Se PAnEO tue aR ier SANTHIACHO HUANUCASE, a Cusabo name.. 22

ee : SANTIAGO DE OCONE—

Apalachee mission......-..2---...-2----- 110, 323 SOTA TERESI oo eee 89, 322
SAN PEDRO Y SAN PABLO DE PATALI, an ;

Bor an’ Oconee umission- 2. = cn. 5ee eee eee 179

Apalachee mission. .........-----+------- 110, 328 SANTO DOMINGO DE ASSAHO. ............... 322
RA EO ao ee sis EOD rs Mit oe SANTO DOMINGO DE TALAJE, a Florida mis-

San RoMAN, ancient cape, identification of 35 dhe. oe ee 89, 322
San SALVADOR DE MACAYA..........--.----- 322 SANTO CP ROAAG De Rare ine ree eee 399
SAN SEBASTIAN—
Qulimtuciatowileeeceeenceeee oeeeereere 328 | SAOGA-HATCHEE—
overwhelmed by high water........-.- 337 a branch of Tulsa........-------------+-- 245
SAN SIMON— described by Hawkins.................- 245
rebellion of Indians of. ..........----+--- 91. population Of. . --..-.--+--++2++++++seeee- 435
Wisitol GOVeLDaIla;tOs. a-e=cceecc serene = 89 | SAPALA—
SANACHICHE, an Apalachicola chief...-...-.-- 132 aiGualetowmcs.© o--s2--es- =e eee 82
SANDFORD, ROBERT, voyage of.........-.... 63 rebellion of Indians of. =-=2-<-=-+-2-2.--- 91
SANTA CATALINA, rebellion of Indians of...-. 91 | SAPALA, BAHIA DE, identification of. ........ 51
SANTA CATARINA, BAHIA DE, identification of. 51 | SAPALA, ISLA DE, identification of. .-......... 51
SANTA CATARINA, ISLA DE, identification of. . 51 | SAPALLA INDIANS, reference to............... 91
SANTA CATARINA DE GUALE, a Florida mis- SAPELO ISLAND—

SIOM= ethene Ua cccaks See oe ee eee 89, 322 abandonment of-.. 222-6 22st eee 93
SANTA CATHALINA DE AHOICA............... 322 French and Spanish names for:......... 51
SANTA CATHALINA DE GUALE............---- 322 wisitiof Gove [barra tol..se sesso ee eee 89
SANTA Cruz, ISLA DE, identification of......- 51 | SAPELO RIVER, French and Spanish names for. 51
SANTA CRUZ;DE CACHIPILE <-56. s258 set be aess 322 | SAPICBAY INDIANS, reference to.-............ 91
SANTA CRUZ) DEPDARICAS 22-228. men ceseee cee 322 | SAPOLA RIVER, Yamasee settlement on...... 102
SANTA CRUZ DE THARIBICA............-.--.- 322 | SAPPALAW, a Synonym of Sapelo............. 93
SANTA CRUZ Mission, described by Dickenson. 92 | SARABAY, early name for St. George Inlet. ... 52

SANTA CRUZ Y SAN PEDRO DE ALCANTARA DE
Y CHUTAFUN—

an Apalachee mission.................. 110, 323

Moaning Of NAME. A= So52sceece~ sec eeuees 111
SANTA ELENA—

arrival of English expedition at.......... 62

Guale language spoken at..-............. 19

murder of missionaries by Indians of. . .. 60

rebellion sof Imdiansiof: <2 °.-. -s.acees eee 59

Sce St. Helena.
SANTA ELENA, BAHIA DE, identification of... 51

SANTA ELENA, ISLA DE, identification of..... 51
SANTA ELENA DE MACHABA................. 322
SANTA FE—

ant Apalachee town. 2522.22 foc ccnseee ce 111

attack on, by infidel Indians. .-......... 120
SANTA FE BAND, in Florida................. 405
SANDAMHE DEC OLOCO Secs. Meese cscs eee 322
SANTA-FEE-TALOFA, a Seminole town........ 406
SANTA HELENA DE MACHAVA................ 322
Santa Lucia, a Timucua mission......... 322
Santa Lucta (an old Ais mission), Indians of:

described by Dickenson...............-- 390-398

SANTA MARIA—

an Apalachee mission ...........--.-.... 111

described by Dickenson............ paces 92,93

See Sarauahi.
SARACARY. See Sarauahi.

SARAUAHI, a Timucua town and river....... 328
SARAUAHI, R. DE, identification of .......... 51,52
SaTApo, a Muskogee settlement ............. 286
SATI, Synonym of Santee: 2-022) cae.. cecene 17
SATOACHE, a synonym of Satuache.......... 61
SATTEES—
at war with TDuscarora:te. -eeceeeeeeesese 18
Synonymifor Santee: SS. s220--- 4eeeeer 18
SATUACHE; locationlof-2s2tee Jecae cee cate eee 61
See Chatuache.
SATURIWA—
a Floridaichief i sos.o. see ceee eee 328, 336
ceremony attending.-.................... 375
drawing Of: 22s ccehlae tones eonwer means 346
expedition of, against Thimogoa....... 378, 379
location;<of territory, Of. 5-222 Sacco eee ece 320
SaucoLA, a, Sawokli chief:. 2.222... cso. cece 141

SAU-WA-NO-GEE. See Sawanogi.
SAU-W0O0-GA-LOO-CHEE, a Lower Creek town. 174
See Sau-woog-e-loo-che.
SAU-W0O0-GE-LO, a synonym for Big Sawokli. 142
SAU-WOOG-E-LOO-CHE, synonym for Little
Sawokliscc7 2 Sckces cence ees Ole a eee 142

Balt 2

' 7%

INDEX 485
Page Page
SAVANNAH, removal of part of...........-..-- 101 | SHAWNEE—Continued.
See Shawnee. driven from settlements. .-...... yer e 415-416
SAVANNAH RIVER, French and Spanish div PennsylVaniay ... J vrsicccewseec cl lee cee 317
TAIN OS TOPs eione coe eS Sh St ot ewe aiackls 51 MOCEULON! Of sso decane seco cet eeettaceece ete. 317
SAVOVOCHEQUEYA. See Sabobche. on the Chattahoochee... .......2.......-- 190
SAWANOGI— Omihe, Vallanoosase-re. ses. sea. oeee eee 190
described by Hawkins..............-+.-.- 320 MOPWIStLONIOLs aces coset ease eemeees ce 434
ODUUNWOND Ol oc Saar eee tae nasa ewan 436 settlements of, among Upper Creeks. ...- 319
BAN OR ie ee A casa be ea Se eee 141-144 | SHEA, JOHN GILMARY, account by, of expe-
BRETILGDS LOW Ea ac ce aoxrecs ck teat 143 GifionoL Allon 25.35 <. cae cseate Soc eee ee 32
armawer Croaintrbe® 225 02 oles cocec. oe 189 | SHEEDOU, name ofa chief-................... 67
a Perinoletmtpesse ca coses ses cose owes 409 See Shadoo.
among Lower Creeks...-.........------- 142 | SHEM-EE, Cusabo name ofa creek............ 22
customs similar to Creek................- 142 | SICALE, See Cicale.
described by Hawkins..-..............- 142,175 | SILVER, found in Florida.-.................. 349
earliest known home of..........-.---.-- 141 | SIM-E-NO-LE-TAL-LAU-HAS-SEE, a Seminole
Bitchiti spoken by wic2os-5.iscn-0-- e282 12 OWENS eee ters See eevee isivicis Biemcseatemeeees 400
included in Hitchiti group............... 172 | SrNaEstA, a Calusa town..-.............---- 332
on the Chattahoochee. ...............-.-- 142) ||| SINAPA; a'Calusa towml:-.c...csss2s-e5k beens 332
on the site of Tallahassee...-...........- 403 | SIOUAN TRIBES—
population of... .... 0c: to-ssSes% oss ete 424, 435 join in war on colonists............. 99-100,101
Seminole town made from............... 400 studied by James Mooney ..............- 10
WniLedswith MNtehitie Ss. oe fn ses a5 2 5ee 143 | SIYAGUECHE, a Timucua town..............- 329
See Big Sawokli, Little Sawokli. SLAVES, Indians taken as. .......---.-.--- 32,33, 69
Scott, JOHN, chief of the Alabama. ..-....... 199; |) SNAKES eating Of 22 cote cee hock eee 358
SEAWEES, a Cusabo tribe..............--....- 68 | SOCIAL ORGANIZATION—
SECHARLECHA, a Lower Creek settlement.... 286 oftthe Calusa. <. soc 5. sccdowssewelseere ss 388
SECHARLITCHA, a Kasihta settlement........ 225 oLthe | Cusaor pate ces itde cence ieee ac 75-76
See Secharlecha. Ofthe LimucCua..<o.c.os nfeecec se a eloese 362-371
SECOFFEE, a Seminole chief.................. 398 | Society OF JESUS, missionary work of.....-. 85
SEEWEE, @ Cusaboltribe....-.....2....652.0% 68) | ‘Secoxa.Calusa town Po .fas. nese. saree 332
Sce Sewee. SoOcocHUNO, a Timucua town. ...........--- 329
SEINE, river named by Ribault.............. 48 | SocséskyY, a Tawasa town. ............------ 131
SE-KO-PE-CHI, a Creek Indian...............- 191 | SoHO INDIANS, reference to .-.......-...----- 91
SELEUXA, a Seminole town.................. 411 | SOHOPIKALIGA (misprint). See Tohopki Ligi.
SELOY. See Soloy. SOLOY, a Timucua townec. . 225. seeccee sans 329
SEIN ME Mes 1. Siu ses fee eck cats 398-414 | SOMME, river named by Ribault........-..-- 48
bands comprising the...................- 404 | SONA, a Cusabo province. .................-- 37
ADIT OF GIO sno om Sarco, a ae sien eee 398 | Sonapasqui. See Sona.
called Lower Creeks by Bartram.... 134,216 | SoOc-HE-AH—
ehiefsilistolee a. ssestes eee. 410, 411-412 Gescribede=35.--s5ss ase eee aceeeaees 251
distinction between Creeks and.......... 404 Hawkins’s name for Sukaispoga. --.....- 248
meaningoLnamMe =... 52225-25055 OS. 8s 398 | Somequa,.a,Guale town... -..--. 2... .<teessc> 82
population Of. .~. 2262 2.52. =. .% 440-441, 442-448 | Sou-GO-HAT-CHE, described by Hawkins. .... 245
remova lof, to the Everglades............ 344 See Saoga-hatchee.
TOWRA MSUOl- ~~ e=sa-ste ssc 406-407, 411-412 | SOUHANE INDIANS, on Suwanee River......- 405
Ti. oe Ae ee ee Pe Ara ee ee a 412 | SouTH CAROLINA— ,
war, Yuchiinvolvedin.................- 312 English colony of, established in 1670.... 61
SENA, a Timucua place name................ 328 first permanent settlementin...........- 67
SERETEE, name given by Lawson to Santee. . 19 | SOWALLA—
SERRALLI. See Surruque. asynonym for Sawokli.-...........-...- 131
SERRANAY. See Sarauahi. @-Lawasa TOW <2. scence aecae- Mates == 131
SERRANAY, R. DE, identification of.......... 51 | SOWOOLLA, a synonym for Sawokli.........- 141
SERROPE TRIBE, mention of................. 321 | SPANAWALKA, a Seminole town..-.-.......-.- 411
SEWEE— SPANIARDS—
SOSA Aa ee or a 67 attitude of, in Yamasee war-.-.........-- 101
FTES Ea) eg et ee ge 66 firstin Cusabo territory..... See eee 31
inchidedtin Gusabo sc.) koe .22b eee 17 | “SPANISH TNDIANS, “OPM lOridS. ..<.. occas 406
probably of Siouan stock................ 17,66 SPECK, F..G., Yuchi authority aac 10,216, 287, 311
SEWEE Bay, early name of Bulls Bay....... 65 SPoKOGI, ceremonial title for Tukabahchee.- 277
Suapoo— SPRING GARDEN— :
ArmPMCsLOcnlotase. .. cole. eu ees 22 Ee Florida RO eee deen anne aie
S YiUCHUSCCUeMENT.- = cccccecsenaacicerioa's 407
TOWDUOL Gescribed <3 255 sss oe de tke 64 | gpaLAME TRIBE—
SHAFTSBURY, EARL oF, Indianssellland to.. 70 ToCationlats csc) ee arty en Pie 49
SHAMANS, practices Of.-..........-.------- 385-387 not mentioned in Spanish narratives....- 50
DHAWNEEMEt. css) to ses ccd srsche basses 317-320 possibly the Stono of later date.......... 50

an Upper Creek tribe.................-.- 189

See Stono,

486 INDEX
Page. Page.

STINKARD LANGUAGE— TALAKHACHA, a Seminole town.............. 412
Meaning Ofterm<\tcenpeessente nace 206 | TALAPO—
towns'speaking. 35. . sasecwee een ees 12 a Cusabo town and tribe.............--- 60,86

STOANOES, a Cusabo tribe...........---..--- 68 chief of, vassal of chief of Aluete......... 19
See Stono. name of a chief and a town.............. 22

Strona, chief of, land ceded by. ..........-- 70 | TaLApuz. See Talapo.

See Stono. TALAX. See Talaxe.

SToNo— TALAXE—

a Gusabotribes-eeeace. see eeeee- see 22,67 atGuale towns: -. Sa.deccbeme cases 83

AITSt NOt COlOL= aaeae oct ee eet ea 61 MENTION Ofs annals rioecisisisic ce Deon OE EEE 243

included in| Cusabo-.n4-5- eee eee 17 See Asao, Isla de; Asao, Bahia de.

possible origin of the name...........-.-- 38 | TALBOTISLAND, Spanishnamefor...........- 51

possibly the Stalame ofearlier date. ...-. 5O;61 |) TALn a. synonyimi for Lalissses-eceseeeeeseee 212

trouble between colonists and. -.---...-..- 69 | TALEHOUYANA, probably a synonym for

WaLiwith)inilG03... =. -eteene sae eee 70 Hotaleihuyanaeerseencceseeeee see we eee 404-405
STONOE;/a| Cusaboitribe--.-.-----.4-62 oe 68 | TAL-E-SEE. See Tulsa.

See Stono. TPALT "DRIBE 2-20 iics cnc einie es eereoe tee eee efetete 211-212
STONOH. See Stono. TALIALICHA, an Apalachee warrior........... 125
STREET, O. D., quoted on Coosada.........-- 202 | TALICOUET, identification of................- 212
STUART, JOHN, proposition of, concerning TATIGUI, identification of. 22 2225--5--eeseeres 212

WatcheZtsacc. acne ce oiteeeeee case ease eee 316 |; TALIMACHUSY, Mention Of2-2-..-- cesses eenee 247

SuACHE. See Duhare. TALIMECO—

SUFALATE, a Cusabo tribe. -.-........--..---- 22,82 description of, by Garcillasso...........- 168

SUKAISPOGA— meaning of the word.................---- 168
a branch of Okfuskee.....-.. ees ..-.. 246,248 | TALIPSEHOGY, a Muskogee settlement........ 286
population Of. <5. <cssd= se esse seen 436 population) of. -2)...ccesteeece ee eeee ee eee 437
See Sooc-he-ah. TALISHATCHIE TOWN, an Upper Creek town. 286

SULOPACAQUES, a Guale town.--..........-.- 84: | -(Qarisi: a Creekitowiacsncse ch sees oe ees 151

SUN WOrship) Ofsscesnescececce cece eee aes 381 See Tulsa.

SUNEPAH, a Tawasa town...-....--.--------- 131 | TALISSE, a synonym for Talisiand Tulsa.... 243

SUOLA-NOCHA, a Seminole town..-.-..-..-.- 400 | TALLADEGA—

SUPERSTITIONS— @ branch town of Abihka 22 2-----seaeee 253
among the Cusaboln fe eeeeecee eee eee 78 population of: sites ceeen eee eee eee 436
ofmloridaindiansecessseeeeeee = =e 383 | TALLAHASSEE—

SuQUE. See Tuque. a Seminole’ town: -<-tesccemececes 407, 409, 411

SURRUCHE, SURRUCLE. See Surruque. a settlement of Yuchilis2 --sascees-ee eee 405

SURRUQUE— old, one of the six Fow] towns ..........- 178
a Timucua tribe or town............----- 329 people of, identified as Sawokli.......... 403
attack on, by Spaniards--...........-.-- 336 | TALLAPOOSA—
classed as a Timucua tribe........-...--- 321 general name used for Alabama......... 197

SUTEREES AT WAR WITHTHE TUSCARORA....- 18 possibly an Alabama town..--.......-.-- 286

SYLACAUGA, a Shawnee town...........----- 319 | TALLASE-HATCHEE, population of............ 437

TABOOS) 1000: = s.h.~ccoscs esis cess cosets stece 383-385 | TALLASSEE TOWN, a Kasihta settlement. ...- 225

TACATACURU— TALLASSEHASE—
avLiIMUCIa LTOUPs.<.c-sncee cease seeeer es 321 a body. of Tulsa: sess teen eee eee 243
native name for Cumberland Island.....- 329 move of, tothe Tallapoosa.........--....- 243

TACATACURU, BAHIA DE, identification of... 51 Sce Tallise, Tulsa.

TACATACURU, ISLA DE, identification of... --- 51 | TAL-LAU-GUE CHAPCO POP-CAU, a Seminole

TACHUMITE, a Yamasee Village..........-..- 104 TOWN 6.5.6 ccc ecco t chee eee eee 400, 403

TAE-KEO-GE, a Synonym for Tuskegee.....-- 209 | TALLEHASSAS. See Tallahassee.

TAENSAS, move to Red River........-..---- 128 | TALLE-WHE-ANAS, a Seminole tribe.......... 409

TARECAUCA, a Gualechief.-..-.cc-cese--eee- 82 See Hotalgihuyana.

TAFOCOLE, a Timucua town...:.....-.------ 329 | TALLIGEWI, identification of................- 213

TAGUAGEMAE, a Calusa town..........-.-.-- 332 | TALLIMUCHASE, mention of.........-.---.-.- 247

TAHAREA, Synonym for Yuchi.............-- 297 | TALLISE—

TAHOGALE, a band of Yuchi.......-....... 189, 212 aisynonym of; Palisi® seo sesee eee 243
See Tahogaléwi. perhaps identical with Tulsa. -.-.......-- 230

TAHOGALEGAS, synonym for Yuchi.....-....- 297 | TAL-LO-WAU THLUC-CO, a synonym for Apa-

TAHOGARIA. See Tahogaléwi. TALMUTCASI—

TAHUPA a DEMUCUA TOWN =enecanee =e =ece 329 a branch of the Okfuskee .. ...-...------- 247

TAK’O’SHA-O’LA, an Alabama town.....--.-..- 199 POpwlation Ofses see - a s-ae alo ee 435

TALAHASOCHTE, a Seminole town....-.-.-.---- 400 | TALPATQUI, an Apalachee town...-.....-..-- 111

TALAHASSEE, a Seminole town....-...------- 412 | TALSA HATCHI, a “lost”? Okchaisettlement... 277

TATLAHASUUGI, OLiGi Ofene gece ne eeaine ee ata 413 | TALWAHADJO, an Upper Creek town...-....-- 286

TALAJE. See Talaxe.

TALWA LAKO, Creek name for Apalachicola... 133

INDEX 487
TAMA— Page. ; TAUCAL. See Tancal. Page

Asynonym for Tama: 23s... <0e< =~ o- +n 181 | TAVAGUEMUE, a Calusa town... .-.........-. 332

aninland people...... 3 ae OR Ae eed 83 | Tavuacio, a Florida settlement............. 333

NOANIGUNCHULONIO kon Rote metas < os 5 a meu PON DAW ASAT = hte eden ode teh a acds 137-141

BO WTI ee Reig sts ac ee ssa sae 181, 182 among Alabama Indians...-.......-.. 139, 140
EG Was VRGReS 2 e e e er 18-191 among Lower Creeks. ../............-.--- 138
EMAL DIITNONS coe shee. act ae hv chewed 28 188 an Alabama LOwmn. 22 Sch tives a= sen soseae 192

DENA ECUNESSOGS <- ccc cks cent vate ncaa 211 pandior Inorg" caciasceosacaee ane 198

GT Re ee oe eee 190-191 classed among the Tallapoosa............ 274

MUDUIRUIGL Of = feed ae aoe eons eae «10 427, 435 disappearance Ol. <a 75e5-0 jo seecn eee e 139

OSSD CNS WESLO- 9.0: coanc assoc e ste 292 element among the Seminole. ..........- 403

probably same as Yuchi............-.- 188-189 Hirst reference CO ss.02 att Sea casotaqcuece 137
TAMAITA, a synonym for Tamahita......... pas French protection sought by....-.-...-. 138
TAMAITAUX, a synonym for Tamahita......- 188 linguistic classification of... ............. 13
LNT Ay Sage ene ee 181-184 LOCAtIONIOS an ta < scan se otastes aan se 137

SB ower Creek tribe... ...5...---s-52--0 189 part of, remove to Louisiana............. 141

an original Seminole tribe. -..........-.- 400 population Of: 2.52: sceaees ewes Sosa eee 424, 436

linguistic classification of .......-....-.-- 12 TOMOVSM Ole. ac ae caewetitt sees eee eee 139, 140

OMe nLOUNESSRO. 2 = one nda o = snake 211 settlement of, at Mobile................- 138

peceyayril ater chs eal a es Ree ene eee 427 ten: “nations? Of= = 2. csacdees ace nee 130
TAMATLES, a Seminole tribe................- 409 COWS! -. Se cones sede Gne se ecu ion -aeeeee 131

See Tamati. Village described by Hawkins...-.......- 197
TAMAXLE, a Lower Creek town.........--.-- 131 Wallon, Dy) RuUSCRrONa.-—cnc-cce ce aeneine 138

See Tamati. TAYQUIQUE, a synonym for Tasquique.. .... 211
TAMAXLE NUEVO, a branch of the Sawokli.... 143 | TcAHKI EAKO—

TAMCECA. See Tanzaca. aCroek: Towle... 2.22 set dacssacvedes ance: 286
TA-MiE-TAH, aSynonym for Tamahita........ 188 a “lost”? Okchai settlement..:..........- 277
TAMPA— an Albibkavtowil-s «2 a5-25- scoa6 sachs -nste 254

BIGAIUISHIUOW Tecra eee crac noc Ssc es Gosdee = 332 - an Okfuskee settlement. ..........------ 249

PORE RICE theres ons oa tns wicca tei isee aaice 331 | TcATOKSOFKA, an Okfuskee town..........-- 247
PD ASCO RAS GUIS TOWN 5... <<s.<c0n ania s= - == 824) TcAWoruL, @ Hitchiti towtl.....-.. 2-22 -.sc.2- 143
Tanaca. See Tanzaca. See Sawokli.

Tancac. See Tancal. TCHIAHAS, a Lower Creek town............- 174

Tancaca. See Tanzaca. See Chiaha.

TANCAL, a Cusabo province..............--- 37 | TcHOUALAS—

TAaNpA. See Tampa. a Lowen Creek towlsaces.s.-2 =: nde eae 174

TANPACASTE, a Timucua chief.............-- 329 probably intended for Sawokli......-..- 175

TANzACA, a Cusabo province. .........-.-.-- 37 | TCHUKO EAKO, a mistake for Tcahkitako... 286

TANZACCA, a province mentioned by Peter TcO’KOTCA’TI, probablysameas New Eufaula 403
WAG Yee wc oo = 3h saat cassie ote ae Sees 43 | TcounA’KO-NINI, on Okfuskee settlement. . . .. 249

See Tanzaca. TreGEsTA. See Tekesta.

TAOGARIA, synonym for Yuchi.............-. 297 | TEKESTA—

See Tahogaléwi. a@ Blorida settlementa.c..<....ssecse cere 333
TaoariA. See Tahogaléwi. a Plorida tribes == ssssese ossees cose 331
TAOUACHE, a synonym for Tawasa.........- 139 Customs! of. 2 os scsehecr Sesceic eS ees 389
TAOUGALE, a band of Yuchi................- 212 | TELLICO, a Cherokee town... ..---.--<.-s222- 212

See Tahogale. TELMOCRESSES, a Seminole tribe. .........-- 409
TAPALA, a Guale town... .........-:....-.-- 82 | TELOUALES, a synonym for Hotiwahali....-. 256
TAPHULGA, & Seminole town.............--- 411 | TENNESSEE RIVER, tribes of.............-- 211-215

See Atap’balgi, Attapulgas. TEODORO, Don DoROTEO, killed at Piachi by
TaRrmica, a Timucua town................-- 329 MIGIANS s 3,-rorcrers arias cele seistoeeets tA 145, 146, 152
Tarixica. See Tarihica. TEQUEMAPO, a Calusa town............---- 332
IRARCATUCA, & Mobile chief .-- 52... -2.2.5<-- 151 | TEqurstTa. See Tekesta.

TASKIGI, account of, by Mooney..........--- 209 | Testa. See Tatesta.

See Tuskegee. DEVO, 4. CAlISh LOW. shew srececceats oes cas 332
TASQUI, possibly occupied by the Tuskegee-. 208 | THamMa, asynonym for Tamali.............- 182
TASQUIQUE, a Lower Creek town.........--- 221 | THarrmicA. See Tarihica.

See Tuskegee. THIMOGOA. See Timucua. 7
TASQUIQUI, a Tuskegee town...............- 208 | THLA-NOO-CHE AU-BAU-LAU, a Hilibi village. 259

See Tuskegee. THLOT-LO-GUL-GAU. Sce Latogalga.

TATANCAL. See Tancal. THOLL THLO COE, one of the Fishpond towns. 201
TATCHEQUIHA— See Latogalga.

asynonym for Kasihta...........-...- 217,219 | THOMAPAS—

identical with Chufytachyqj-.........-.-- 217 MENON Of. ./c<isicecsecaceases eso tee ose 274
Tavesta, a Calusa town...-...---2.-..205-05 332 POPUIAWMON Of. =~ cceccseo-=sccaemseenes 436
PAT HCOOING S6e. poeti tact sadaee «none cade ese ess 351 | THOMEZ—

TATTO-WHE-HALLYS, a Seminole tribe........ 409 CUSLOMS Of. «cee asia sence eee seas see 162
TAUASA, a synonym for Tawasa.........-.-- 137 nation of, near Fort Louis... ............ 164

488 INDEX

THOMEZ—Continued. Page TOHOME—Continued. Page
singing of calumet by. =---4---s22-ce~ oe 162 visit to; of Thervilles2 5s... -+- et eomeeee 161 —
synonym for Tohome.............--.---- 159 Sce Thomez.

THREE ISLANDS, population of...-......-.-- 437 | Tonopxi LAGt, a Seminole town ...-.....--- 412

'THU-LE-OC-WHO-CAT-LAU, identification of... 248 | ToHowoGty, a Lower Creek town...-......- 286

TIBWEN, a Cusabo place name.........-...-- 22 | ToHTOGAGI—

TICOPACHE, a synonym for Tukabahchee.... 279 destribed 41.225 -/2ic oe se pcsen ones 250

TIHE— locationOfa 22. sects s sooner eee sees 248
ai Cusabo province sees see-ee sae eee 37 | ToKOSIMALA. See Hicks, John.
dress of inhabitants of...........-.------ 43 | TOLAPATAFI, a Timucua town.......-.....-. 329
mentioned by Peter Martyr...-...-..--- 42 | TOLARNULKAR HATCHEE, Kasihta settlement
people of, a race of priests....--......-.-- 43, 47 (0) ERA SP ct ES hcg Se a 225

Tine. See Tihe. TOLEMATO, Indian settlement near St. Augus-

Timucua— tine Shs Se eS en ccinece Same teee eee 104, 340
an Indian village near St. Augustine... 105,106 | ToLoco, a Timucua town..............--.-- 329
and Guale names, difference between. -- - 15 | ToLorrya—
combined into groups........-.--.------ 320 a'Guale towns: < 2222. Soe. oseener eee es 82
confederacy: or tribeas-s-2-25--ss5- sesso: 329 location Ofs. 3222 222: seen eee 82
dialect, spoken by Osochi............---- 165 near 'St.-Aneustine.-2 =. ..ssseeee eee ee 105
Indians, appearance of...-.......-..---.- 345 residence of head mico.............-.-.<- 84
language, publications in.........-..-..-- 337 See Tulufina.

IMiIsSSionSss ss eRe ne ees 322 | ToLuFINA. See Tulufina.

populationofs.s2 s2caesce sees ee eee 337 | TOMAHITANS—

proper, location of.............- tee ek 320-321 aisynonyim for Tamahita- =~ oe esses eee 184
mepellion Of 6562225 cere nen cee eee eee 338 @ Virginia’ tribe: 2222--- +e eee eee eee 184
sites once. occupied by-..-.........2----- 93 | TOMCGOBE. See Tomsobe.

Warriors Skill iofs7 Gee Lee oe sce ees 380 | ToMEO, a Timucua town...................- 329

TIMUQUA PROVINCE, invaded by Yamasee. - - 97 | TOMHETAUS, a Synonym for Tamahita....... 188
See Timucua. TOMMAKEES: 5 coos Soe oe soe oe cee aoe 165

Tricor Haw, a Cusabo place name...-......- 22 probably Osochitaat=s.secee eee eee eee 26, 165

TIQUIJAGUA, a Calusa town.......--......--- 332'4| Lomo, ‘a Calusa towels. .c2.---n--seeeeeeeeoe 332

TIQUIPACHE— Tomocas, territory claimed by.-.......-.-... 180
a Lower Creek tOwil-es sen sss ee cea 221 See Timucua.
expedition against......-....--..-.=--.-- 180 | TomMocHICHI—
synonym for Tukabahchee.............. 279 chief of the Yamacraw -<!..-----.- 2220. 109

TIQUIPAXCHE, a Synonym for Tukabahchee.. 279 TeferencestOs. 2 ca.2 6 tee eee eee 15

TivEcocayo. See Cocayo. TOMOOKA'. 25 553.54! 2a. Soe ee eee 165

TryE. See Tihe. a ‘Tawasa town 22-2 0-66 oe ee aoe see ene cee 131

TOA, a synonym for Tamati................. 181 Synonym for Timucua--- ses. ]s-e eee 131

TOALLI, a Synonym for Tamati..........-.-- 181 | TomSoBE, a Calusa town:.....-...---..----- 332

TOASI, a Synonym for Tawasa............... 137 || “TONCO; 4 Calusa townessse- == 5-— eee eee 332

ToBacco— TONGARIA. See Tahogaléwi.
use of, by Florida Indians............... 360 | ToNGERIA, synonym for Yuchi.........-....- 297
use of, by Hobe Indians...............-- 393 | TonomatTo. See Tolomato.

TOCASTE, a Timucua village. .--2..ce-.----~1 329 | ToNnonpPaA, possibly identical with Witumpka 206

TOC-CO-GUL-EGAU, a Yuchi village........... 310 | ToOH-TO-CAU-GEE. See Tohtogagi.

TOCK-TO-ETH-LA, a Seminole town........-... 407 | ToOK-A-BATCHEES, a synonym for Tukabah-

TOCOAYA, A: Timucua town = hee: scaeslsetee 329 Che6 22 Fons2 hese sce tanita ooo eee eee 278

TOCOBAGA— TOOK-AU-BAT-CHE, & Synonym for Tukabah-

a Timucua chichi steer seen eee ee eeeee 329 chee. : 3,-0.0 Se a eee 279
a Timucua province... -ess2s-eeee eee 321,329 | TOOK-AU-BAT-CHE TAL-LAU-HAS-SEE, de-

chief of, visited by Menéndez.........--- 342 SCYiDOW ao vee sce anceee Seat ae eee 250
expedition against. —_ch-eeeceee ss oscmeere 343 | Too-wos-sAu. See Tawasa.

massacre of Spaniards at...............-: 336 | TOPANANAULKA, a Seminole town...-.....-- 411

TocoHayA. See Tocoaya. TOP-HULGA—

Tocor. See Tocoy. 9 Seminole towns. 2-~- 3-56 a. 2555-0 see 407

Tocopaca. See Tocobaga. a synonym for Attapulgas...........-.-- 407

TocovaGA. See Tocobaga. Topiqul, murder of missionary at .........-- 86

TOCOY a LIMUCUaLOWiless eee eee aie 321, 329 See Tupiqui.

Tocoya. See Tocoaya. TOP-KE-GAL-GA, a Seminole town...-......-.- 407

TOHOGALEGAS, a Synonym for Yuchi........ 202 | TopKELAKE, meaning of the name.........-- 405
See DPahogaléwi-=- a. ssc- cote eae. 288 | TopoBaGa. See Tocobaga.

MOHOMES. pean eee cree seca cerbies enone 150-165 | Topocapa, an Apalachee town...........--- 126
classed as Choctaws..<<= =< < enn cee ee 165 | ToTEPACHES, a synonym for Tukabahchee.. 279
JOCHULONY Of a1 setae seis taal etal areata ata 159, 160,161 | ToTIpACHE, a synonym for Tukabahchee.... 279
peace overtures to, from French......... 161 | ToOTOAWATHLA, a Seminole town...-...------ 411
population Ofs.c22-adanmarcs cess ceemee ee 425 | TOTOLOSEHACHE, a Hitchiti branch village.. 178

possible meaning of the name..........-. 160

See Tut-tal-lo-see.

—

:
x
:
:
:
:

INDEX 489
Page. Page
TOTOPOTOMOI, a Pamunkey chief...........- 295 | TuNIcA, driven from homes...............-. 195
TOTS-TA-LA-HOEETS-KA, a Seminole town.... 406 | TUNSA, a Florida town. ............-......-- 333
TOUACHA, 4 Synonym for Tawasa..........-. 138 See Antonico.
ToOUACHAS, a synonym for Tawasa...-....... 138 | TuPica. See Tupiqui.
TouLousE, Fort, established among Ala- TUPICHIHASAO, rebellion of Indians of........ 91

Ripieirer hee ee Sor ees ak aia seed om Bie a3 cin L00¢ Py RUPIQUT, a; Gtrale tows ct <2 ule wets te. 82
Toupra. See Touppa. TUQUE a Guale towns ss2 coast oe ae 83
Tourra— TURKEY CREEK, a Creek town......:......-- 286

name not found in Spanish narratives. - . 50 | TUscARORA, tribes allied against the........- 17
name of chief and town. ...............-- 22 | TUSILGIS Tco’KO, a Kasihta branch.......... 225
Eben OeAtON Ofc. Seg elu: asiesuacome 49 | TUSKAMEHA, a Mikasuki chief..............- 401
tribe, probably united with other tribes. OS) MWSERGER 2. .o.-.2ste2-J0e2 aie Aa a3 ee 207-211
MOwASA, & Dawase town; .....0....<.-.c0.2% 131 an; Upper. Creekitribe..-... 2... 2.22.22 189
See Tawasa. called Alabama by Bartram............. 197
TOWASSEE— described by Hawkins................... 209
a@ Tawasa settlement..............0....2- 140 laniguseel Of saaae.,: snc wesee et ee ee 14, 207
Alnbama'settled.in = -<2%< 2<..2s. 22.22 8ee 200 lodation: Ofsa accSsee ab ease osiee eae 209
TOWASSEE OLD TOWN, a Tawasa town.....- 140 on the Chattahoochee River ............. 189
TOWASSEE TALAHASSEE, a synonym for on the Tennessee River. ....2.....:.----- 211
Mowssseo Old Own. «Jo -c55 Ssecesce we cine se 140 PUpwiahion Ofske 2 hee ase ca sewete eres 429, 437
Town HovusE— TTUSKEHENEHAW CHOOLEY’S TOWN, a Kasihta
OT ARGV CUTS 010 Ee ee Ss ae oa SE 76 settlement .-.-<sashsccescctecc os atc eee 225
2) ULES 13 Dy Se 64 | TUSLALAHOCKAKA, a Seminole town......... 412
See Houses. TUS-SE-KIAH Micco, a Kasihta chief......... 223
Toya, feast of, described by Laudonniére.... 79-80 | TUT-TAL-LO-SEE, a Hitchiti branch village... 177
IPRANSPORTA TION ween cones se eecceee bee k 355-356 See Totolosehache.
DEMOUSINOANS =< J.-S cadens wanetercects 392 | Tuxiqul. See Tupiqui.
TRASCALUZA, a Mobile province. ...........-. 159 | TYBEE ROADS, Spanish name for............ 51
See Tascaluca. UGACHILE—
TslyauHi, a Cherokee place name............. 167 9, Hlorida Province-.---52+ -csaseen sees 165, 329
TsoyaHA, Yuchi name for themselves....... 287 an important Florida chief-.............. 334
TUASI, a Synonym for Tawasa............... 137 connection of, with Osochi............... 166
Recht CANIS TOW Ds: 922 2sus eee aase ote. 2) $32) UcHE, aisynonymifor Yuchi-- 2255. esas 287
TUCKABATCHEE HARJO’S TOWN, a Kasihta UcHE TOWN. See Yuchi.

RCRA RT Lame hoe ae ios sexe ace Ohat ease 225 | UCHEE,asynonym for Yuchi................ 288
TUCKAGULGA, a Seminole town.............. 413. | UUCHILAPE;.a\Gualeitowns.-.2 <2: ts. 2c. = eek 81, 82
MUCURA, &@ Timucua town... -...2-.3.<08...2 329 | UCHIZES, a synonym for Creeks.............. 90
MocURO, a Timucua tOwnl.. 2-2... 05... ecek 329 | UCITA VILLAGE, description of..............-. 353
FouRUTO. a. GUale TOWN. 2.5. 225s-2cc.365. 00.0 83 See Ocita.

SERUFROREDA TITER eR 2 Pos er 88 oc uP ox & 277-282 | WCULEGUE, a Gualetown..--=-.--2:.s<2s2-- 81
a Muskopes Giyision =... cs... 55.652.- 2 a 215 | UFALAGUE—
described by Hawkins..-............... 279-281 a Cusabo tribe: is-5228ta=-222 ssc scee 60, 82
FHEPHAPO Ole fect. Se sek sea hase lce 27 chief of, vassal of Aluete................- 19
leading town among the Upper Creeks... 277 the name -ofalchiel: > ten-s-s-h ee eeeaeee 22
musrawonlerand Olssas.252 5c. 5-5 bbe: 278 | UFALEGUE. See Ufalague.
not an original Muskogee town.......... 277 | UFALLAHS, a Seminole tribe................. 409
MOPUIAMON Oleeren asa se- ss JanaSods ce. 3 433, 435 See Eufaula.
TUKABAHCHEE TALLAHASSEE— UrERA. See Yufera.
a branch of the Okfuskee................ 247 | UiracnHuco—
tn outsettlement of Okfuskee Indians.... 273 an; Apalachee\towin.ss 5-2 22 scbes ene eee 116
probable origin of name.................. 279 synonym for San Lorenco de Ybitha-
TUKPAFKA— CHUCU ae es os sees oe Se eee ce oe eee 112
a branch of Wakokai.............- 258, 264, 265 See Ivitachuco.
an Okfuskee settlement...-.............. 248 | ULIBAHALI—
Indians, Hilibi built by................. 258 a synonym for Holiwahali..............- 254
MUP MIAMOU Memes aa ~ 8s esos fests es 436 a true Muskogee town..--......-........ 193
TULSA— ULLIBAHALI, a synonym for Hotiwahali...... 254
described by Hawkins...:..........-.... 244 | ULuMAy—
PRUDBURIIOMOL 2 ocpees pastes Coote ncn cus 435 a) Hlorida provincee.22-cbcen- st aa ee los 330, 331
TULUFINA— a Florida settlement......... 2-22.22. 333
RUMRHBIO-LOWI.- Soop warnecso ne Seacncoae 60,82 | UNALCAPA. See Unallapa.
referred to as a province of Tama........ 83 | UNALLAPA, a Guale town............-..----- 81
See Tolofina. UNCUAULA, an Upper Creek town..........- 286
TUMAQUE, OLE T EN GTC (2) Gil eee See 82 | UPPER CREEK TRIBES—
TUM-MAULT-LAU. See Tamati. MSG Of eo act mere ce stmiasceneetce an mp 189
TUNAGUE, a Guale chief...... See eels 82

490 INDEX

Upper EvFAULA— Page Wando— Page. :
mention of.ceatece see pase Soee ee eee eee 261 a Cusabo tribe... -. 56-0 cee asceennse 17,23, 67- "=
population of............--2-------2----= 436 location: off 1n-16702 0 << ceee.c earn = =e eee 61

UQUETEN, a Timucua village......---------- 330 merged into other tribes.........--.----- 71

URIcA, a Timucua town.........------------ 330 | WANDOE. See Wando.

URIUTINA— WANNIAH, a Cusabo tribe........-...------- 68
QuLimucualchiehseescseemee-eeties eclen 165 | Wantoot, a Cusabo place name..........--- 23
a Limuctawillagess...sssuse=teee sce ccme 330 | WAPENSAW, a Cusabo place name. .......-..-. 23

URRIBARACUXI, URRIPACOXIT, URRIPARA- Waroo. See Wappoo.

coxl. See Orriparacogi. WAPPETAW BRIDGE, a Cusabo place name... 23

URRUCLE. See Surruque. Warro. See Wappoo.

URRvYA. See Urubia. Wappoo, Cusabo name ofa creek and tribe. - 23

URUBIA, a Timucua town. ...........-cccce- 330 | WaR—

UscaMacu— Vamasee.. cccccste sects sate eee peeaees 98-102
an island visited by Juan Pardo..... 5500, ~ ti) Green, Peach c= <a 2c. ses coe eee eee 270-271
LOCATON Ofee aces ane ciee aaaieinte a ieaae let im 5D! LU WAR CUSTOMSeecese seme eeneeeee 43, 76-77, 376-380
revolt of province of............-.-e-e20- 58 | WASHAWS, mention of....---....-----.----- 150
Sce Escamacu, Maccou. WASHISHOE, a Cusabo place name.......--.- 23

UsHERY, 2 branch of the Catawba.......-.-- 306 | WAsHUA, a Cusabo place name.............. 23

UssEtTA, Bartram’s name for Kasihta-......-.. 222 | WassAw SounD, Spanish name for.......... 51

Usta, a town on the Bay of Santa Elena. ... 53
See Edisto.
UstaGa, Ustaqua. See Hostaqua.

UTAYNE, a Timucua town..........- vets 330
Utica, a Timucua town.........----------- 330
UTIcHINI, a Timucua place name-........---- 330
UTINA—
a synonym for Timucua...........-.---- 330
LOCROM Ole aacsee eetecns seen aes 320-321
MMOH TONE Meas cee ais ietenisle sieleisi'= sleet aera 336
termitoryiclaimed by---sssse-sesos ase 180
Utina Pasa, a Timucua name..........--.-- 330
UTINAMA. See Utinamocharra.
UTINAMOCHARRA, a Timucua town.......... 330
UTINE, a Guale town .---...2.5..-----.------ 82
UZACHIL, a synonym for Ugachile...........- 165
UZELA, an Apalachee town............-..- 111,116
VANDERA, JUAN DE LA, relation by.........- 55
VANTABALES. See Tampa.
VEACHILE, a synonym for Ugachile.......... 165
VEcA. See Beca.
VEHIPES, synonym for Creeks.......----+-+++ 102
VERA CRUZ, a Timucua village............-- 330
VERRAZANO, expedition of............------- 334
VICELA, a Timucua tOwWN.........--ceeceeee 330

VIEUX MOBILIENS, a station of the Mobile.... 160
VITACHUCO, a synonym for San Lorengo de

NWibithaChuculsecccccccsccccceccesececccen« 112

See lvitachuco.

VUEBE, 2 Calusa tOWD<-<.-scccccsccncesees | OO

WABANO, mention Of...........5..2.22------ 214

WACCAMAW, possible origin of the name..... 38

W ACHITOKHA, a Seminole town..-.-.-....--- 412

W A-CISSA-TALOFA, a2 Seminole town.......... 406

W ACKSOYOCHEES, probably same as Okchai-

iG ae SA abocospabiboonoscoacoocmuaoDaariodaas 201

WapbBoo, the Cusabo name of a Creek...... 22

WWEAKKOKGAT a clostawia nies aaiels esis ccisie eales'= eialeie ine 263-265
a division of the Muskogee............-.. 215
described by Hawkins............-.----- 263
LOCATON Ole s cscs secede secs === 1 ess 263
POPULAON Ole erisseciseisiseeteeeeee ss eiate 431, 436
signification ofname.....-...-./.--..-.-. 263

WALLHAL, a Muskogeesettlement.-........-.. 286

WAMBAW, a Cusabo placename............- 22

WAMPEE. See Wampi.

Wamrpl, the Indian name ofa plant....... S55 23

Wasupa, a Seminole town.....-........-... 41
WatsBoo. See Wadboo.

WATCHETSAU. See Witcheau.

Watroo. See Wadboo.

WATTEREES, at war with the Tuscarora..... 18

WAW-KA-SAU-SU, a Seminole town..........- 406
WaxXAws, at war withthe Tuscarora........ 18
WEAPONS &\<(c'clatwoistaie welaaiaaia aieta eictetel stom taatate 356-357
WE-CHO-TOOK-ME, a Seminole town. ---... 400,403
WEETUMPKEE, on the Tombigbee.-......---- 206
See Witumpka.
WEHUARTHLY, a Tukabahchee village....... 282
WEKIVAS, a Seminole tribe............---..- 409 -
WELIKA, a Seminole town..........--------- 412
WELONKEES—
@ CLeCKStOWIl is. scaite stan ouisesiae eee iets 197
probably the Witumpka...........-.-.. 206
WEsTA. See Westo.
WESTO—
called man-eaterS............-.------- 66, 67, 68
Cusabo name for the Yuchi.............- 23
Gepredations of the: =o --css-.- a= seeee 66-67
feared by other tribes. 222 a2esa--e- eee eee 67, 68
identified as Yuchi............-... 189, 218, 288
Jana oO Oli ae cioce ere cdece een eeeeee 289, 290
order for:‘trade .with\=..22--)-cemeee ese 217 *
possible Iroquoian connection of......-.. 290
town, described by Woodward.......... 306
War-with Hnglish=2 css. sesese--neeeeeeeee 307
war-like propensities of-...........-..- -- 306
WestoBoo, Cusabo name for Savannah ~*
IRIVCLES sad caccnsceses coe reece sieeeetee 23

WeEsTOE. See Westo.

WESTOEBOU. See Westoboo.

WESTOES. See Westo.

WEsTOH, WESTRAS. See Westo.

WE-THOE-CUCHY-TALOFA, a Seminole town.. 407

WE-TUM-CAU, described by Hawkins........ 228
See Witumpka.

WetTumPKA. See Witumpka.

W EUPKEES—
a synonym for Okiti-yagani............. 143
population Of-=s-secs--- cen eee eee 435
WE-WO-CAU, a Synonym for Wiwohka....... 271
WEYOLLA, a Muskogee settlement ..........- 286
WEYPULCO, probably same as Opiltako...... 282

WHITE KiNG, chief of Talahasutci..........- 413

a ee ee ee

CMO Fe (ORY ONY ae RON Be gels

ear

+86 PY

|
|

ene
INDEX 491
Page. Page.

WIcHAGOEs, probably an Okfuskee town.... 249 re settlement near Mobile..........-- 106

Wicucauu, chief of, land ceded by........-- 70 e Yamasee.

See Witcheau. YAMASE LAND, on Pensacola Bay.........-- 106
WIKAIBLAKO, Sce Okmulgee. WAMASEM sess --naccesenctwece- Sade bdetsn 80-109
WILLA-NOUCHA-TALOFA, a Seminole town.... 406 an independent tribe..................-. 94
WIMBEE— at war with the Tuscarora............... 18

RIGS ODED Osseo s..csc sens 2en wee ose 17, 23, 67 attack of, on white settlement. -.....-.... 103

HST rT Ts by 0p oa la eae ea 70 firsfiobiee Ol. aceeemsas seeeescinesceee 95

(GLESn115 .0) eo aE eS a Pia 62 join English colony of Carolina.......... 96

possible identification of........-.....--- 62 joined in uprising by Apalachee......... 124
WIMBEHE, a Cusabo tribe.................-- 68 language, spoken in Catawba confeder-

See Wimbee. OVE ce acta ae sidvin'Sacianissoe see eae 102
Win, a Cusabo personal name.....- Sabo 23 linguistic classification of...............- 14
WINCHESTER SETTLEMENTS OF SHAWNEE... 318 members of Creek confederacy........-.. 16, 109
Winyaw Bay, Spanish name for..........-. dl name of, supersedes Guale.............-. 94
WI0GUFKI— on Chattahoochee River.............-...- 190

a branch town of Wakokai.............-- 264 peace made between Apalachee and..... 119

(012) 100 E02 | ee ee 436 request of, for missionmaries.............. 95, 102
WISKINBOO, a Cusabo place name..--...-..-- 23 settle near Mobiles. 72-5. 0aesecte neces: 106
WITCHEAU— territory claimed by... 0.5. ..iceaccesacs 180

MW GHSADO GELDOlo5- 0552 fate Sabie Ges ei 23 town destroyed by the English........ 103-104

ISH INGNWON Ole. ..22Hanes te soss oaclic ee 62 COWS s «cc awe ctechimacesis sneackeetet eae eee 97

iMeindedan-Cusabos: ..2is. at i= - 2205-8 17 Wale. Finn sac concep eee nee see ce cet 71, 97-101
WIitTuMPKA— YAMISCARON—

an outvillage of Coweta Tallahassee .... -. 206 a CUSADOPLOVINGCE: 5. ces coe chee eco nee 37

an Upper Creek town and tribe...-...-.- 189, 206 a Synonym for Yamasee................- 95

ancient name of Wiwohka.............-- 270 | YAMMOSEES, synonym for Yamasee......... 97
WituncaRA, probably Witumpka....-...... 228 | YANAHUME—

PRWGHRA So eee a ea tieG aces tees ts 270-271 Cusabo\ place mames 7.5 scsnec-c0 seecese 23
RANPONWIGUINDKS <2. -2..2-25-205-- cdoce SOUS town on Santa Elena Bay-............... 53
composite nature of.........-... Seer sece 210), YAOCAY, ‘a Timucua towlls.-.----5-22e2s<c0< 330
described by Hawkins.............-....- 271 | YAPALAGA, an Apalachee town.............. lll
a pMlaOn Ob aso 25 2 - Seo eo oo - oe == 435 | Ypana, Timucua name for Guale province.. 81

W0C-co-core, a Synonym for Wakokai....... 263 | Ys1,Ysy, population of....-................ 337

WoksoyupsHI. See Wacksoyochees. See Yui.

WotrF IsLanp, French name for...........-- 51) || YCsRrur population Of... c....5-26-Serceseee: 337

Women, treatment of, by Cusabo........... 73 See Icafi.

Wommony— YCAPALANO, a Timucua town............... 330
a Cusabo personal name........-..-.-..- 23 | YcHUSE, Bay or. See Ichuse.

“bind trea ttelg ori Geo ee es eee 65 | YCOUALE, a Synonym for Hotiwahali........ 256
Woop, ABRAHAM, a Virginia pioneer...-... 184 | Y=MAsI BAND OF CREEKS, mentioned....... 108
Woopwarb, HENRY, left at Port Royal to See Yamasee.

BLU WAIANPUAP OS coe nns es sacs -s = ces ones 65 | YENyocHOL. See Yenyohol.

Wozxista, probably meant for Westo..-.....- 308 | YENYOHOL, a Cusabo province.............. 37

XAMINAMBE. Sce Xamunambe. YESHOE, a Cusabo place name............... 23

XAMUNAMBE— YEWHAW, a Yamasee town.................- 97
a Cusabo province........2..2.--.--..+.. 37 | YrreLo. See Yfulo.
mentioned by Peter Martyr..........-.- ADAMO. a Guale LOWil-tes occ. cis saceteasen es 83

XAMuUNANUC. See Xamunambe. YFUSINIQUE, a Guale town.......-.......--- 81, 82

Xapipa. See Xapira. VoAPe. a:synonym for Milibi-.. o5...-.-see oe 259

Xaprra,a Cusabo province. .......-..------ 37 | Ymco. See Yenyohol.

XAPIRACTA. See Xapira. WMUNAPA, a Gualetowil. «.|/s2.-<<.--5s0ee—<- 84

PAPTIGAS & IOMIOS LOW =- 22... 220-2255 on 330 | yoa—

See Caparaca. ; aiGualotowmeesence co noress foo eeeee see 81
XATALALANO, & Florida town............... 330 OCHTIOTO fie cane oh a A 82
SoAvA, 3 Cheraw “oe SS eo a aes -o YOuFALAS, a Lower Creek town.-..........- 174
Pwo xT, CUSADO PLOWING. -.\.)..2.-----------< Oe See Watavill:

Yuacaya. See Guacaya. YsICAS, a Synonym for Chiscas............... 299

XUMUNAUNBE. Sce Xamunambe. eat nao eiavincs 37

Yacva, a Calusa town.............- eee hese 333 Z Oe Sa ee

YALACASOOCHE, a Seminole town..........- 4i2 | YTALAPO. See Talapo.

YAMACRAW— YTarRA. See Itaraholata.
connected with Yamasee......... Fader 108 | YTHA. See Yta.
members of Creek Confederacy........- 16,109 | Yrogugo. See Aytochuco.
possible origin of name.............--.-. 37 | Yua, a Timucua town....... eave easier -- 330
Settlement of the town.................. 108 See Yoa.

Yusana, possibly a general name for Mu

khogean peoples............ aoe atest Seeeeany.
bait he eR 14 ocs6 5h fo aoe 286-312 |
a Lower Creek town. s2o.2-. ec ewcs- sie 174
a Seminole tribe...........-..-- ence ta a” 409
at La Salle’s fort............¢. Sachetewrs Sess 296
at war with Tuscarora..... OIdoactcagsnas 18
attack of, on Guale missions...........-. 90
body of, exterminated by the Cherokee.. 298°
classed as Algonquians................-- 297
distinct languageiol--. ssc debe cess ee oe 290
identification of............. camnoets dbase 288-289
incorporated with Creek confederacy. .... 286
languagelof.. Seeee: oases eee 190, 287, 309
Jocation of: 4.1.0 Oeseascece occ ceeeceees 190
TAT OS = areic c.cieiaielaicltaietewi lsere ees ale ee ratetate 15
near, St. Augustines:s.0ceg2isc cle eee 299
on) James FRiver<t2is sce seco ieee 295
on the: Tennessee cso. scntecete eck oe eee. 211
MOP ULALOMOL jose ee oe eee 433, 434, 435
possible origin of nameé.................. 287
removaliof.partiofzess-s.s.ceee=~ se acces 101
studied) by: Dr. (Specks. = 22c2222-senceece 9-10
territory occupied by--.-.-.----------- 218-219

eee a. Lowe: CHa town...
See Eufaula. .
YUFERA— “hy
mentionOf.ceccesesee hoes seems
Timucua town..........-.---
YUGUALE, a synonym for Holiwahali.
Yui, a Timucua province ...........
YULAKA, a Seminole town
YUMERSEE— :
a Seminole town...... 3 aes x
later name of the Yamasee

YustaGa, location of........-.-
YUSTAGA, YUSTAQUA. See Hostaqua.
ZACOROY. See Cacoroy. pee
ZORRUQUE. See Surruque.
ZuNIGA, GOv. Don José DE, account 0 eee
invasion of Apalachia............--. senate

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY | vas Sms ad a BULLETIN 73 PLATE |

ars.
SON wes
perc

sati (2b)
cx fap)

\
Ykanteati
» Chiana (2b)

* Eufaula, (2)

ork. eee
See

Ee es) ey aa

(

J S rhe
i ee aN s
Zoi : . — %.
Ly ae y¥F5, % otjoushrdte es
eeeae ys. (tip)

bby,
oe ilipeey \_ 7
/ Wakokai §
ua i. ebahenee sll
Kabahchee C), lat
OxNskee tl)

topalga

mam asa fo
LS 2

\ Dx

Tans ae re he ie
Wuch) 2 lsd! ( STEN ie ES
~\6nic aie ne Si Nis

\ : \ | WAs eS
Nani lo) pense. Cay
ibta we) Y CN ee § PS

assee ~~ a

y Okfugkee
aKFus OLE,
ape et

a
ae

Alabama
{ :

iss f tS
aR Gee)
‘ St Hel Indfans
Nie

2 hSeeou or
Ci cu

of ) Ww
eae @: >
Oe I

)

Boe \

cae \
\ 7 \ | r

SCAmMaz:

\ a
\weeta (Yuchi 48) \ Res
Sikvotomi AY RRR pHitchini(4c)
alaghicola(y (| ~\
\ ¢

Nee, Sits
ae ON 7

if \ g Ekaulgee (3) , )
/ WHotalgihuyana

- Y NO ee
ae lon ‘ is,
tid \ ( f

| a y { /

d . 3 * \ WA

} ys \
" )

Gsoch} Niece)

Sie IRR NG ae

RRC
( fMobile yah

rT Se ey
ifs (2b) «) oe

vi
(Apalachee Ds KS a A
7a) /)\Movilé walZy
Leone Oat ‘

yee cy
20 ne =
‘he | ye a\<

Chatot (3) 1s Bet
aX. 8 o Sh
gowtheave nN Bae \
M \
22, x eas } !
EST ae A on
i a 4 ee SKM

}

le S ino
SS ‘a Re “aes Q

ve ee TA ia ae e

Ls \ Sool rs XX As7o\ EN

SJ QaRRSHep yh he pampeneshESs NC Fe.

See aires ee |
3S Siete ie
VM U } > / 2

; i ¢ eae

oe
seni 9S
ara
ae
INDIAN TRIBES OF THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

COMPILED BY J. R. SWANTON
1919

NUMBERS ARE PLACED AFTER THE NAMES OF TRIBES
TO INDICATE SUCCESSIVE GEOGRAPHIC POSITIONS OCCU-
PIED BY THEM.

LETTER SYMBOLS ARE USED WHERE A TRIBE SPLIT
INTO TWO OR MORE SECTIONS.

THE LATER SETTLEMENTS OF THE CREEKS IN
iG | “7 FLORIDA, THOSE OF THE SO-CALLED SEMINOLE INDIANS,

: . ARE PRINTED IN RED.

THE RED NUMERALS, EXCEPT THOSE IN PARENTHESES,
REFER TO NUMBERS IN THE TEXT.

oar |
ngs |
a ~. ore -

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY j

cme os ee 6 ees

2° meee oe eee —— ——= ——
oe «ces
ee oo
Sa eS Semmaaee oes cee) oy | samme fer ax sas iw Saas oe
. oc ee eo
coe

\
(

)

| \ ; ee SSN } Va é |
| We NS f \

Creek Settiemens

e
° vA
\
| ~ fo \
e SQ A
Creek Settlement YL fe
rele ickacaw fo hoasatl (2b) \
Ancjent .
Creek Town \ io a
Sc Vi
NN fpve ton's Village \
= fA /Gxeen)
a) ee 2
we \
uGriffin Village (1813) 5
Us e
as & ee (Gk .
gy turkeytown \
(Creek) B
\ Eufaula (1)
a
.
. a
Otivall Vee ueil eS
AEN MC 2 Qid Greek Village
Black Warrior wp lalishatchee
Town
Igtapoga ie) \
2 a §
Kantcati ?
i 7 (
Fife’s Village, ?
Chi Sets (0) alladegas (e
Talwahadjo yp Coosa (3) sEufaula (2)
aan ¢ Z Atcinaulga a Tukpafka (Nuyaka)
<6) Coosa (2
4 a Abihkutci (Abihka) J
; Asilanabi Kohatchee Lutcapoga , Ghakitako :
: @Natchez \Hilibi @)
| a Lanutciabala '
i Shawnee (3b f ‘ Chattahoochee
Pochusthatche ocr aey \
| Z ; Anetechapke ’
bah ' Arak
' gz Hilici @e du caahassee i e Chutakonini
Koi Aucheucaula « Im. WISE NSIS af/Hotitaiga
| Pinhuti Weo usEie 42 erusatsiatge TOkFuskutci (2) 8
\ pUnchala TUKpa x Suka-tspoga uske Okfuskeenini
8 2
| Soo cae tatogalga Teatoksofka ie orrusuccr ee:
Wiwonka (id peas ita ros
ilako. t
: SRen sd Be OkFuskee oe an |
Bufaula(3) AG ee ~
| Ipisa S
Hatcheechubbas
‘ 5 aji@ 4
| ICRP A cose
bs Okchai (\) Wakokai)
’ & 2 5
a8 & Saogahatchee —
| ee Pevstuanpes a er Tawasa (6) {
a Tama’ ita Gite £3 cae woes Vuchi Ge}, Atasi (3) PURSES CTSIIES
’ eats 8 { uahegee'G a) rad Tulsa(2) s. a
oasari (a) - ose 37/*ChatukchuFaula <
| Panchy Ala GTawasa R) Fey 233 By ANamasec(sS) We , Deum Bisa ~ Apatai at
. u
° Koasati (2a) Pinan eee ree aonawngets), % a6; <2 @) tik tense)
> S ae 5) ae & tLaplako ta(2) 2 =
h Chapit. hananagi © ira ( Kasihta@)
| noumoukbé Witoutacne pAchapita % eee Kasihta@) [Later Chicka
a Yuchi @b) f
5 Okchaiutci (3) Green ONSe| katcka (1)
a
| epee Okmuigee (2)
IChatapy Se a gs Hitchiti &
‘ : 4 Ke Atal (2:
Chotala Tuskegee (2a)
| >\Kasihta(S) me Oconee (2a)
; ae OK Say
: im Sawoklutci
oat @ Tamahita (2)
Chita 4 (4a)
Okawaig n
ae (Yuchi 3b) ee
a
Bachele Tamati (3) \

Eufadla Hopai

\ Okitiyagani

\
Shawhee (3a) Meto- Husse-Wakkes\__

‘

Wetumpka (2) itchiti @)

Tamahita (4) varineen CXL)

<a sa @)

Tawasa (3) g

(

H
|
|
|
|
ee
|
|
|
|
|

xamati (4)

wal y Osochi@
\ A} Ta a e{Apalachicola(3)_ ~
T° —e\ = amen oo
P\o Tawa La «) Py ie oan eo) a) =
Q
x
Pay
aie.
4
Ors

w (3b)]

Intus

Sectanautletentienee

kalga

ws Tokyulga

La
Soiree

RSC Ee cj as eh Sia aes ase SS He et SS oS co 5

;

Patcilaiga

Yamasee (3

Kealed i

Saw\o k!1i @)

)

Hitchiti (2)

Timothy Barnard's Place

Amohali

Okmyigee (3)

Hitchitutci

a Cacia

syo ©

4T.Barnard’s

a
ee See oe |
a )
8
4
a
eS)
y
Oconee (la)
\y
SS
Cc r
8
Ga)

PLATE 2

TERRITORY OF THE STATES OF GEORGIA AND ALABAMA
illustrating the
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION AND MOVEMENTS

of the

TRIBES AND TOWNS OF THE CREEK CONFEDERACY

Numbers indicate successive positions of the tribes
Letters are employed where tribes separated into two or more bands

COMPILED BY J.R.SWANTON
I919

.
Hogologgé(Yuc! =

verte (Yuchi 2b

ter Shawnee ca
Apalachee (2a.

Chickasaw (2b) =e Silver Bluff (Yuchi 26)
Yuchi (2b)
gogechee (Yuchi 2b)
A. Chiaha (la)
ilibi f kasihta Cofitachequ! |)

= Hilibi @ Ca papalachicola @
punt Pleasant
MUR cht 2b)

L
cs}
a
>
o
©

D
GEE

Yamasee iS fa RY

7) (Yamacraw)

ENGRAVED AND PRINTED SYTHE U,S.GEOLOGICAL SURVEY _

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY

BUILIIETIN 73 IALATIE 3
e S oO o — —
| : So 80° 75°
>) —
is iilenwers
= \\ jMusare's 1200 Men in 13 villlages
300 Men 0 30 60 120 180 240
RG Pew Bi A: pe ea ie a eee
British Miles
Cape Henry
Ny
i "
ema © © ceumm= o o 9
e aD © © comes © Bex eS
s ea Sees ce a= oo 2° Ge © © mmm « » oOo wien BO\UNDS OF —_
° = cam ec ame © 2 Sew © uum © o EEE © ©
<= *
: Aconiche |
= 6 French Settiemen ef Pampticoug,
oo (oY) deserted o Sau /t
< pnlet
a new
- ro)
- ou ONO eT ae
o
3 sc
i)
(CY) pe
ie
= OS Savanah Land good Pasture Ground y eee ee Hatteras
35} 4 Geen
ras In fey °
a8 25
8 36 = Cs 77) °
= ° Waterees a Sy
s 40 Men \ i
v rum Inler-
a ° Ri boys ° © Ly
Ol
oe i since ye warr nei Charakeys Cape Lookout
MS sSaw Removed A French Fort G ° : °
RB) © 1700 Men in 30 villages Sos.)
c= <I: 50 in 2 villages £ Saluda Sa// /n ler
ee fusarecs =
iada deserted Sa ay
=< ° 1 fe
ce ae Sere Mi
& = 7 Charakeys ge fo) Cape Fear This Cape divides NS Carolina
/ 300 Men in 10 villages iS aoe. ° a Charlestown
cm ° / 2. Corp . =
52 efatucks Vatean All Level Land and good Ground “ j dn. Herries LA Lockwood Folly
Removed SS Se
a we Canstass Chacahumas oe Ve
£ > emoved 100 Men in2 villages
2 meg }
Cee ae \ ( ‘S Cape Carteret
® Chickesaws\ ( J s Rise
is af ve
Eee woe OY Lian ra ele ( Tangeaieaslloy $e
a, n re \
: zi a of ppelaches Jy Charles Town
j 150 M
s 5 o Knautches y ; ~ eee Apa: “= oi Sion RICE
2 we 800 Men Cusaws 2 ZX 150 Men Ch Rati sp,
Z owe
Savanah \Land Yand good Ground EA ie aos
Addashes oun Abecas Ockfaskes 100 M \ 3
Sani pean coca if ; 250 Men in 10 villagds pees a ae } aie
‘° wi inas
which creats a Trade eee 7 eclaliahuces s,
the Indians round it =< ROINGn ne ee RY) 6 Men ZS Oconerys 70Men Se, ie
Talfabuses Mer 71 WKeowetas 30% “ch
Halbama in 10 village pega Ses Sole a %
fg Aart 6 AGROSIES Chehaws 20Men
3>/French For u 5
pr ay yt Namasee Sosowolias ? Santa Cataline Sound
Chactaws 2 y sa y A / L Bai AN 7 7,
cea M 8 9 f St Catherina
é en \ B &/ 1870 Apalaky Gowalege (20 Men Allata py, Se NS
( 5 S | ey indians were hilied \ : *4e p Sape/a |Sounde
| and! taken by 64 ove @) o Sapelalisiand
° F CoE whites and the Greeke- 4
Humaw’s and 200 Men } indians in 1708 Vatamche\ Mouth
° 400 Men A OSansemona
Ballaws ) »
250 French in i) = \ DPaltivoane
Ustal j ~ Louis or = / Se
A aw F i oy aes St Philipee
00 Men s g ¢) s 9
Apalacheeo Siapalalecsaldiviliae este { ost Pedro Island
pake PON Chap, nd Chactooo 0 St Maria SiR u beontae ns — @} St Marta Island
con ® de Pal aky iat fs ee (pleme! Salawa
< ! ; vad oH
UAT mee A a Q EE, 4
a French Factory J ( “GO Plea Ss { Assilla® oAlluc
SG ) C St Francisco huhho os
/ : ¢
. o Nughella~ We SX?
Yagnet sito Z Vv + 3S
c ¢O Bay 100 indians living //
[eS Chandeleur | Psypeehiyl if under cloak (|
C) Temasees Plerre Q gi & Broken Land Large Inland “Matanzas Bay
250 Men in Friendship }
with no Nation v) SOUTH BOUNDS
gj sere © S eee ww eee Ne the Vamasgee Indians
N eR have their Ganoes to goe a
fy)
ke 49 OF CAROLINA slave hunting at Kings
Le oe! 6 days coming from St
(ASS Wier Ui hac en BL hee te Sy hia ee eee eo Whans River Mouth O C fi A / y
) Q S22 Sve» Oo, Lakes Motrassesand S| seek ata
= 2, oe ~~.
(0) Org é - P a
Nor ny CS, "Gan Rive BA
Shoals Pile Ce 2 eae ; # D keys
Z iS Pay, inhabited by some Indians if
7. ‘“,
fe \ <> iv 2
Nee “ey : y s
Oy; Dest Suliga ¥ *
*
y [7 ! Blahama %,
IG fF O / 5 H Nombre a Ss,
1 *
{ bs
\ Q
\ \
\ Banck ‘QMexco Keys
Seale Key ‘
8 \
The Distribution of Indian Tribes
9
in the : zLucayos or Abaco |
x
: D
SORE nhs T ;BAHAMA ISLANDS
x
*% Hole in the
about the year 1715 x Rocks
Redrawn from a blueprint of the original among the British Archives M KH X. pA C O
THE DISPOSITION OF THE INDIAN TRIBES INDICATES THAT IT
WAS PREPARED SHORTLY BEFORE THE OUTBREAK OF THE YAMAS-
SEE WAR, IN 1715, THOUGH THE “FRENCH FORT” AT THE JUNCTION
H OF COOSA AND TALLAPOOSA RIVERS WAS PROBABLY BUILT
i AFTER THAT EVENT, AND THIS FEATURE MAY HAVE BEEN INSERTED i
ees LATER. THE ORIGINAL IS IN A SOMEWHAT DAMAGED CONDITION, 0 =i
1/25 AND A FEW NAMES OF GREEK TOWNS ON THE ALTAMAHA RIVER ee eu
AND ITS BRANCHES ARE ILLEGIBLE. THE MAP WAS MADE AVAIL- 5 ZS ee
ABLE THROUGH THE KINDNESS OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA HIS- ps 0? ae Cy) ‘
TORICAL SOCIETY. BortuRssi) S\ See ge is
\ 1 3 \ 1 S *
SS G. Florida | Exuma Sound 3
. f 2 |
oe ° ° =1 , =
95° 90° 85 West from London 80 75

ENGRAVED AND PRINTED BY THE U.S.GEOLOGIGAL SURVEY

ari 7

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY | SUWUETIN WS PLAS 4

—_ ; Ze 379 5 a 12%
Ie eer Say wy) Poe, | POLTO oo Geet, A Sues Q YPIPD Qo
ee Eo 09 IIe, DoE rag g SL gen PER? FES MARE PET | or = eee co
999 @ 2 pe + 22 AP 28g ee |S ee Maric 3.”
oe Ee
poate f |Charokees _~ Le ete
nance zee 23 a,
“99? o® 2] 29 OB ot : 5
508 aap? ce ope, Na oy a
hg egou8 gape? ey g 9 a ee ov Opa SRee
i 919A o 910 Po MBW Ree % PF wo ere J
2992. ae “fh

+. gi PRE ;

0 MRP S3qe

Pe?

ON hae
Econorocti ? sx >

See
} IO?

a’ epo t+ Clin 5
9 tees

B 2 P?F og
Collomino

Z ; ie :
se . | F
i a ey ye ae
aoe Re ahah Ps oo NA as
a ry
cS a -
’ — |
St ai

. = ct J 3
e : Py / (a= Ft
See aa Coe ae FG | _28te Be8%

- ° Gee ) ea,
93 920 229 ey is maa ore S Be FU
Palcagoula ° i a aot 1? tee 2 72, : ey - 4 1WRP To She ? o
§ > 7e8? 249 as y -vart se 3 be ior) ptee % > ke Pay Peres waa SOY

——___——
Se
B28 ee
y 7 4 J P22r28
seg
5 Alachua,
ce) 2 FG
27 A
ee
sees SF

gage” 9
a

TE GAG all

APP a PPP VE
eel

creer 22? Da Arn 9] wo
aero] 29 RF ABER
ol 283 arangegnrg| Se
es Cae ee ees we

Boytee Po Pg

G ‘a
I.del Anclote
THE SOUTHEASTERN PART oF te PRESENT UNIQED STATES is

FROM THE POPPLE MAP OF 1733

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY

—= =

THIS MAP WAS COMPILED BY
BARON DE CRENAY, COMMAN-
DANT OF THE POST OF MOBILE,IN
MARCH, 1733, AND. REPRODUCED
FROM THE ORIGINAL IN THE
FRENCH ARCHIVES FOR PETER J.
HAMILTON, WHO PUBLISHED IT
IN THE SECOND EDITION OF HIS
“COLONIAL MOBILE,” PP. 190-196,
AND THROUGH WHOSE KIND-
NESS THE PRESENT. COPY WAS
SECURED.

| J
a
\ Aes.
/ {5

Baye S¥ Lows
u“

°
= S Bernard

We GS

Habitatlons de la Pointe Coupee &

PE A

BULLETIN 73

PEATE:

< PAYS DIES CHACHOUMA \

Ghachouma
aa

®
apouches

\
\
\
'
0 Veo
@ Mee
Les Arcansa /\\\~~~--~ oes
io! a) NR SoS >
MLS oe PAYS DES iTSHACTAS é
. = i & Poe sas
Se 3 “7
S so jue cm oe
3 = efi s <2 Be
sey Signs: a
Si Se MEE ASS So atchienele
2 FETS 5 as ie oe ee epatensnoucha
2 Caffetalayaa 6 3££9 jo Me-S hSchkanapa
S Wyn 8 NOR: Fes” AGitoupougoula le grand
. OUES AS PRR Aguectacna ST
0 _f_W eRe SF ap aha Bitoupougoula le petit
se

es <i AY z
Moneoulnenas i-Vane sa Mongoy ite outchako
Atlant.chifpud pat A taysne

MELE eS LOS
og ce. oR sOuantonloula

. ao
2 Sea ae Z
er Oe Co a / \ mi
ae * Y
ERG \ \/ *
af x \ ¥ oe
aos \ . /
N ¢
5 (Supe /
~ Be SK S ; \ Z
BS he koe
=. /
my / ge ee ag
d
S ; > S40
& i ' Senéacha®
! NaShoubaoiianja ha, _
a =~
/ Boukfouloukché ~~~ a
me OSES
/
Cd
‘
/
/
t
}
it
a2aaea
aa ae a
Yotiané
y
Grand Gouffre /
ve
/
/
/
y
4
/
7
’ 3
ak 1
Q&
2) \
9
‘ait en 173) Q
‘ort Rosaly :
M le Baronde, derruirs Natche> = Pe
J.Bienville he 9S \
aa ws
SS =
3 g
=
>
a

Goncession de GChaumont

abandonné
3 chenaux

Petit Tonica

nis Moulin abandonnée
ee uavaels:
7 oncession

Concession

RedouteA\(), Graveline

Pascagou ja,

<eseh 5
j ee ai chevrsuils
aa
Bilocchy abandonne en 1739 “—

i Qo
Chetimacha aan
Concession de Paris

NSS \
LacPontcharirain |
ie Ouma Pa

of a

1 6 °
} a Ry 3 @ Bae eaeee ye ene
Petit Ouma $ S @ a a) J aux valsseaux
> 4 1 chat:
a aux S
Ba
ow
Ci - Ma
ey ee A.
x > a > ies)
oe “gy
ee oS G isa
on > SS o 2
K 0 g 2
ieee ehh s
rn a £
< a °
%,
cya o
ae ee Bie es
A . } Laux Breton See
\ SS Co WK
SEN
rest
pee Wy posses “
pee \ Baye } SZ

‘ > je Entrée du Fleuve S$. Louis
See Cole, ag
7 5 F ( Ascension See

x e S
asse LW Sua-oue® ae Sud

\ Apalaches@le
\. MF Pechon th
\ La Lande

on
So

Ecore aux Prunes

7
/
Lgfourche--7

es /
@ Mobiliens“

Ongoulastog:
RK

a
aN

| de Ste Rose

M LE eae T&

a Pours
Cong, lapué

eJiapé”
ale R
a6 ences
Q) alalek
Foutehachy ®Totipaches
Sanargue
2, nn u
2 Ecor mor ou aux Bie
i
Sle ys
9
eolhe Boar

Baye S. Joseph

°
0
© 9

S
Gap S. Blaise

CO”

Pitlaco

® Les grands Oefasqué

T1424? 2 Pye
4 Ses

Olsles aux Chiens

Toulkaon.,

id aAbecoucnys
a

ones
@Cacheta
aogouloux 38

ochoutchy 8 ¢

Youfala .

sOcony

THE TERRITORY BETWEEN THE CHATTAHOOCHEE

AND

MISSISSIPPI RIVERS

ENGRAVED AND PRINTED BYTHE

U.S.GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

2
a oe

pT Kh

i |
t.,
as

‘e! BS.

fis,

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY

Chicafaw Towns & English ~
‘actories ~

the|ea tent of the English Settle.

TRADERS ua Jy,

Ry
ayomulgee )|.from/2
ere, Ohi S

The English havelactories
&Settlernents of all the Tow
of the Creek Indi an;

— | note except Albarnus whic!

English 28 ‘years before.

Mol eee) 7S)

ered and surrendered tothe Carolinas after-two memorable

and the Spaniards av 1702 &.1703 at the

9)
C.Efcondido or/StBlaife

ed ) i — i

Q
\

LS sat of |

RN PART of me PRESENT UNITED STATES

| MOUTHS ofthe MISSISIPL THE SOUTHEASTE
| | i | FROM THE MITCHELL MAP OF 1755

etree Tk

as
e . <P

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY

Over the Hills and Valley Settlements

26 Chilhee

BULLETIN 73
{ PART OF THE PURCELL MAP

Compiled not later than 1770 in the interest of
33 Gt. Tallico 40 Tomally BRITISH INDIAN TRADE
27 Tallassee 34 Chatiqui 41 Chiowee by John Stuart, H.M.Sup't of Indian Affairs
28 Seltaco 35 Haywassee 42 Esthenoree Original in the Edward E. Ayer Collection, Newberry Library, Chicago, !11.
Ge 29 Chote 36 Natally 43 Toruro ¢ ve me
ee 30 Tannasee 37 Lt. Tallico qe
is 3] Toqua 38 Quotecon .
<P>, 32 Tomally 39 Nehowee
LN
g .
CHICASAW NATION J Middle Settlements +
2 Echoy Z Cowhee 22 Tesuntee 3)
| Chicalaia Opays Matahaw T. 7 Ashuck Hooma 1 \3Tassee 18 Rownirens 23 Tuckanitli x 9
Pekivaw 8 McGillwray and Strather's Plantation i ie Waren fe rapes ge oe ieee SN K man
a S O ] y 2A eons
. \ = s v 9
3 Chukasalaya 9 Opay Mattahaw’s Plantation # I6Ayore 21 ANeioy K apcettlemenrs
4 i .
4 Chatclaw 10 Commissary MclIntosh's Plantation § r
Pe - ‘ Lower Settlemeats | N :
ae I Rubby's Hog Craul y | Keewohee 5 Quaratchi SyOcconey (Ae
. 6
6 Tuckewillow t ZLittle Kewohee 6 Estatoy pes e* r e
‘4 3Connasetchi orSugarTown 7 Ustaly 11 Yeakgyrer x \, f
- 4. Toxoay 8 Tomasee 3 3
U Ps Fort Rrince Georgé @
mS U io or Keewowee ~ \
7. i] SS oe
r) ® qos of
i: CHACTAW NATION iS real a 6)
Cer
ri Panthe 22 Aithee Uckehuca 44 Coastraw Ss \ VN
4
ot \
| 2 Supeessa 23 Osuktalaya 45 Tallow vas wild oN
+ e oe Saat pena SOE
4 3 Coosa , 24 Tonicahaw 46 Talpahoka } porat te 10 Fig IS SENS
U : ; Soe
@ 4Chomontakali 25 West Obeika 47 Oskelagna ny
{ ¢ a ee
of a ry 4 5 Oaka Loosa 26 West Yasoo 48 Bishcoon Oo
ey O) wy ee 0
gt” Sa eas 4 6 Slank Aullah 27 Cabeahoola 49 Senekchaw
oh a BY © {pond cS = ; © Cc R Ee E K N A ah
; § aa SFP 7 East Yasoo = aa 28 Okapoola 50 Olaskshanabe Oo a
= — Ae a =e °
Ses ~ ay oro q . : Ey \ I
Pie eras aya of Sm, aig ho opeecelnohialant ce West Cah ei Ors ve eatoomane Upper Creeks + 2
2 oJ a \ nl 3 ; oS eax: NX
ee: ¢ ; 9 Imongolacha Skalani 30 Kaffitralaya 52 Shanhaw cee rea | Coosa Old Town 9 Weeoka 17 Little Oakchoys 25 Gallobe &,
Ys, ’ “10 Aithee Aimithaw 31 Senekahaw 53 Sooctoloose oS acres :
Vig eS, a ; 2 Tailassehasee = = 10 Qakfuskee 18 Mukalasses 26 Wallhal
Tp) Se ~ ‘ 1] Ayanabe 32 Oka Goopely 54 Chicasawhay Serie Ee aa a reat f : \
ss) hi ’ 3 Abicouchi il Cailedgie = 19 Savannah 27 Atchasapa
© § 12 Oka Aftackla 33 Alleon Loanshaw 55 Enan = i= seis \
} : c hi I2 Little Tallassi 20 White Ground 28 Tickabal
y ree CKavale. \
fe > 1. 13 Escoola 34 Lushasha 56 Chikilk Batcha Salen Ue latyae Sie Neecoun MESES ae tees cam
\ 3 : =
aN o t ; 5 Mulberry tree 13 Hickary Ground 21 Coclamie 29 Great Tassie ;
pier” S , 14 East Congeeto Mv 35 Conchatiekpe 57 lyukkene ay
22 C1 0 Chawelatchi 4
. @ Ss i 15 Bogue Toocolochitto 36 Oka Chippo NB. denotes deserted places during this CreekWar CMreccokay bacakchey> OR CHEESS 9 avelatchie S
\ =z : . “
> i § 16 Yagne Shoogama 37 Gustachas S£ Ruined in the late Civil War 7 Hittable IS Goosada 23 JamesGermany — 5! Halfway S
\ t
fs eo. q 17 East Abuka 38 Conchapa Consapa jmulgeeR C 8 Ruknatallahassa 16 Weetomkee 24 Ottassy .
ver Da 1 4 q F
€ ce & i S 18 Abitapoocolachitto © 39 West Imongoolasha ;
H 4. 2 / ote BIE ' : Qe Lower Creeks
O ein re ¥9 Choocahoola 40 Bishasha <
nee A oa Waa, 20 Okahoola 41 Chanke “ 32 Little Goweta 37 Woristo 42 Swagala. Ocone
nl 4 CY “On meliing -* .
C ps IN eae ea 5 Cee ee 2! Olitassa 42 Oka Copassa ‘ a4 33 Great Coweta 38 Ocmulgie 43 Swagalatchie ‘
: ee. 158 \G a 18 4 eL : ‘ \
A eee PASEO SS pee erohed, 43 Oony 2 2 34 GowetaNewTown 39 Hitcheta 44 Lower Eufalla
Los AT Oe 1 Rtet a Tale us va ;
x Ys Are, i, He. Be ee te H¢ pa apenes <2 : ‘ 35 Olayatskee 40 Palachocota 45 Tuassie 3 :
36 y vag Sgt si eo wt 72) Sy Ngo of ! 2 ‘ H as $ fae
a a RO as MS CNS RCE Nee eco i ; Tushalousa 4 \ . °
get eS ‘o a Sara. 6 \ Pe ionki ate e a Pee Seen cae ie worthward 36 Cussita 41 Occonee x é a
m4 a i, a 2 4 \ eee \ Eek b Meee Cn; ut {ts head 1s bu - 2,
oe) Yo % ss SY 2s ‘ “ee REA cn Sen, i Casaw eet o! 5 a
Pho. FFLapa/s Ds M Pa pl he | 2. " .
ane oe 1A Td AG ey Coasada : ‘ ‘ " A . 1
ac RS i r } w ee Tee
Bo sqraloase. oe Coosada Camp i ' : ° = UTES "swam
fe) Maes > is | WS i:
dv wee re © the Creek Nation ‘ ? : |
NN 4 MI 9 ‘
® Lashufer. ))P° t sae 21 oS \
Q Old Spaniard r) SA Ww << a '
S Suckfalaya a as %h'2 Fp QQSA29 3 ‘
Balchacs, 1 YF Pa dee Sy ‘
Er A ie — v
By) a c if Ke N= ’
XN. a i © \
a (5 ph is \
aN 8 y Old Mow cy ‘
a \ >.
L c=
pee 5 A or the Brown Lines# ©
are Lands Ceded to!
His MAJESTY by tel
Chactaws but Claimed

bythe Creeks

EO et ae

ENGRAVED AND PRINTED.6Y THE U.S.GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PLATE 7

|
|
|
|
|
|
:

BULLETIN 73 PLATE 8

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY

\ Utchanulg.
E, athlos\s ga i Casares
obice ea \

a \
md \
3 4 KY %

Lak /Tudka-
s batchee oe
a) New York \

eS ua

SHTRAP {|SHOALS e S| a \
Packun#laéllahass wats Xt
al y SI gas

os;

See

mk Cawleboe Ce
lee

Wi Ia hatches alarge town
Ce A White Ground. 4 fo ne
orth

Ores i) 20 30. S40 MILES *

PART OF THE MELISH MAP OF 1814, COVERING THE SEAT OF WAR BETWEEN THE CREEK |
INDIANS AND THE AMERICANS IN [8138-14

eee Pate Vie
é A as.

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY.

TOWNS
of the

CREEK CONFEDERACY

as shown on the Early Map of Georgia, 1515

“f
Bs)
So
SS
: ®
: S
Tuskegee
Ft Thoulouse
Q now Fr Jacksof
g
= Coo-sau-dee
& a os Ly
) ae Too-was-3a

Ft Wil

liam

Te nk@ysiands ;

Papras )\sp hickory Ground
Atiook-choi-oc-chee

E-cun-cha-ta

44 Pau-wac-ta

$8 At-lau-gee

SS
\
Indian claim exting ighed to si the Treaty of

O f

Pucan)\ Talla-has-see

We-vo-ka

Ocheubofa

Sam-bel-lau

Fy)

a ufaulay
ry
id

\
Rs ‘om
: “50 yas wide

a LOOk-au-batchee
%Tal-la-has-see

Falls 27 Fr Perper.
ees Tallahassee
Kaupatchee
oe

t Deca cee Eur-Fad- 10 SOF

Oak-fuls-kee

5 eee tuc-Ro-ha ———

Ao-f#R- ae

po eel: chau-Pax ue

wes

aa Gau-go-hatchee

Chaf-tuc-chu-fau-lee

NeSo8 pee
XN <> 60 E
ene ? O 2
QA = o
= SL oh-hee g f K Ay

hat description found In

-/1- Jae Bes

Qak-fus-kee- ee
Ok-fus-coo-chee

fellas S-see
}

Z fo

O-se |i gee

SS OF G

hehe chee one Oy io
1 one re
fn &
- ig

\ . -la-choo-chee , |

ryy @
~ ou
— ee non °
ces Sx \oconee 2 ee
o

i ee, oe a Sau-woo-ga-loo-chee, ,
aa
- S CO-~%
2 Pe,
‘@

nar

t
J
j
J

ort Jackson,

pn O'<

ee the Georgians Sep.27th 1793
a\

Rock Mountain
)
Buz Standing Peach Tree
d \
o a r
" @ oo
0) G
x
1 \
¢\ (
\%
at
&
\
$
@) a
« $2) ay 4B
ovN Sve
e } ® = os
4
é =
=X
oO
the River 1s ~~
— =
é: =
ee Si
aed ce
roe on
ne
awyence
~>
18th Novr re
/ “e
Path =
) oat anahill vee we

Au-p ~fan-e¢

us
‘ou
5 ' fu (Pond Gin
= \ Me Intosh's | ° otohgu Tus-tyh-nug-gee
Sad Cowetrau .
ey) N :
= a Cone, = ®Marshalls pert 20 Nevr.
Sy & eg 0?
oe “< any 0? i]
a, “ia Se 5q,88 Hatche’ rhis Zi Novr
ry
Gr . anh © Novr 2? Novr
AY Mike ell “ox a Keasseta “a
> éeeg| * “oe os
= wv ry) %
Being peci & Uchee #
ts > rN
Hovr26 5 = Osachees as
ich the Army return *
uy Z° Che-au-choo- chee Hitch¢-tee
e an

é
not

of
2)
/ ae Pn md
ie oe ~| aA
Wie SSA Co-chif- Se? 23> * Sau-woo-ga-loo-chee
A

NEES
Sas ot
: Cf”, EB
Pa
9
Eu-fa-lauy/ as
Ue
= ot ay
Oke-fe-yo-con-ne_ 0
A Sum-mr hr
a
b
8
Ol “0
ee
= Jo”
yo?
Here the Hilly
S Rs Ground commences
\ Stones
ey
S
Qa
=a
©
o, Ponds
yy :
2)

ofime Sinks
44 Perrimons

Small British Fort
bulit during the kate war

SS by Gol. Nicols

Gypress\®
WPres:
im)

Ponds

Ourt-tal-los<see 4%

INDIAN
2

G
NY
iS Hav
Ny) W)
g
0 f @
3 »
& 3
&
cS ®
o
tA
W/Fort Scott
es
a
v $
R)
&
G

St. Marks 7

APPALACHEE

BULLETIN: 73. “PEAGESS

“Chee >

as)
~s
Sc
/
ee
X
,E
v
S
jer]
S ce
2S) >
is} v
ae oo
Sg)
me
oY

Hitche-touche

Falls

High Limestone
Bluff

CLAIM

BAY

La)
2 tf

ENGRAVED AND PRINTED BYTHE U.S.GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BUEELERIN 73.) PEATE WO

Flat Rocks

- amy

Hy
2

\ Porn€ Where \ihe Vanigaeeon fw i:
:

THE CHICKASAW COUNTRY IN 1796-1800. G. H. V. COLLOT

WNMULAUAU LA

9088 01421 8184

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Texts

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "Bulletin"

See other formats